Centered on the Periphery: the Changing Dynamic Between Ionia and Imperial Powers 454-C.294 Bce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Centered on the Periphery: the Changing Dynamic Between Ionia and Imperial Powers 454-C.294 Bce CENTERED ON THE PERIPHERY: THE CHANGING DYNAMIC BETWEEN IONIA AND IMPERIAL POWERS 454-C.294 BCE JOSHUA P. NUDELL A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL AT THE UNVIERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY MAY 2017 © Copyright Joshua P. Nudell, 2017 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled: CENTERED ON THE PERIPHERY: THE CHANGING DYNAMIC BETWEEN IONIA AND IMPERIAL POWERS, 454-C.294 BCE Presented by Joshua P. Nudell, A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ________________________________________________ Professor Ian Worthington ________________________________________________ Professor A. Mark Smith ________________________________________________ Professor Anatole Mori ________________________________________________ Professor Theodore A. Tarkow ________________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey A. Stevens This dissertation has two dedications: First: to the memories of my grandfathers, Irving Nudell (d. 2017) and Robert Spaulding (d. 2012). Second: to the refugees risking their lives in the crossing from Turkey to Chios. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There is no such thing as purely intellectual activity, divorced from the politics and cares of the world. Credit for this dissertation belongs to me, but I owe no mean debt to a large number of people for the final product. The first debt is to my family, whom I do not see or speak to nearly as often as I ought. I am eternally grateful that they instilled (and tolerated) a love of reading and learning from an early age, supported and encouraged what has turned out to be a lifetime of education. This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my two grandfathers, Robert Spaulding and Irving Nudell, both of whom passed away while I was completing my PhD. The second debt is to my friends, old and new, whose presence enriches my life. These are the people with whom I play, converse, celebrate, and commiserate. There are too many people to list individually, but three are due special mention: Josh Klindienst and Hana Akselrod, who are my biggest cheerleaders (Hana receives another commendation for once translating an article from Russian), and my partner Elizabeth, who bears the brunt of my frustrations. The third debt is to all those people who have contributed to my education. My deepest gratitude goes out to those teachers who have helped me along the way and indulged my curiosity. Particular thanks in this goes out to my high school Latin teacher, Norma Weisen, three members of the Brandeis Classics Department, Ann Koloski- Ostrow, Cheryl Walker, and Lenny Muellner, as well as William Kapelle from the Brandeis History Department. The fourth debt is to the people and programs that have offered me academic support in my developing and writing this dissertation. Most importantly, I owe a great deal to my advisor, Ian Worthington. He has read innumerable chapter drafts over the past three years and spilled gallons of ink improving this project in ways both large and small. It is also to his credit that this project exists at all, since it was an innocuous question to him from a publisher about writing a new book on Caria that was the earliest seed of this project. I said “no” to Caria, but it caused me to start looking at the Greeks of Asia Minor. I owe Ian my gratitude for allowing me the freedom to develop this project, as well as for his crusade to purge my writing of a number of tics (I am sure there are still ii brutally abused commas and number disagreements left to be found), and for his unflagging support over the eight years I have been at the University of Missouri. I likewise owe a debt to my committee members, Anatole Mori, A. Mark Smith, Ted Tarkow, and Jeff Stevens for their support over the years, some in reading drafts of my dissertation, others for their support of me at conferences and in course work, and all for their availability to step up as needed. I would also like to acknowledge the University of Missouri History Department, Graduate School, and Ancient Studies Program for awarding me travel funding to support my research and the History Department for offering me a dissertation fellowship for the 2015-2016 academic year. I would also like to express my gratitude to scholars outside the University of Missouri who gave astute feedback on portions of my research after reading chapter drafts or in discussion at conferences, including Andrew Erskine, Lee Patterson, and Jeanne Reames. Stephen Ruzicka is deserving of special mention since he graciously read and gave feedback on the entire manuscript. By way of the final acknowledgement, I must explain the second dedication. Early on in the dissertation process, I set up Google alerts for news stories about the Ionian poleis. This decision had unforeseen consequences since, for instance, there is an Ephesus lighting company. The most common alert, however, was getting an almost daily update about the ongoing refugee crisis. After a while I stopped reading all of the updates because it was too heart-wrenching; one story that will never leave me was about a police raid on a factory that was using refugee children to make “life vests” out of non- buoyant material for sale to refugees trying to cross illegally into Chios. The situation for these refugees remains critical, both on Chios and in Turkey, but the dedication also transcends humanitarian impulse. I am struck that the flood of refugees from Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East, displaced from their homes and seeking safety in Europe, has been making their way across the length of Turkey to the ancient region of Ionia (and Aeolis) before crossing to Greece. In the aggregate, this is roughly the same route taken by the ancient Persian royal road and thus they are living embodiment of the continuing relevance of one of the central themes in my dissertation: that Ionia was one of the links connecting East and West. To all of these people and more: thank you. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii Abbreviations v Map of Ionia ix I. Introduction 1 II. Ionia and Ionians, 454-c.294: A Reassessment 1. Prologue: Ionia, 478-454 18 2. Ionia under Athenian Hegemony: 454-412 22 3. Battlefield Ionia: 412-387 52 4. Persian and Hecatomnid Domination: 387-336 75 5. The Liberation of Ionia?: 336-323 106 6. From Alexander to Lysimachus: 323-c.294 134 7. A Synopsis of Classical and Early Hellenistic Ionia: Freedom’s Just Another Word 163 III. Thematic Case Studies: New Perspectives on Classical and early Hellenistic Ionia 8. The Ionian League in the Classical Period 170 9. Ephesus and the Delian League 175 10. A Product of Alliance: Ionian Levies in Spartan Campaigns in Asia, 412-394 189 11. “Does anyone care about those Greeks living in Asia?:” Ionia and Attic Orators in the 4th Century 209 12. Interstate Arbitration between Ionian Poleis 249 13. Ionian Exiles, Poleis, and Alexander’s Exiles Decree 261 14. The Burden of Empire on Ionia: A Study of Phoros Payments 274 15. Ionian Coinage and the Delian League: Economic Imperialism and the Standards Decrees 297 16. Ionian Commodity Networks: A Tumultuous Fourth Century? 320 17. Monuments to Commercial Prosperity?: Construction and Reconstruction at Ionian Sanctuaries 339 18. Hellenistic Kings, War, and the Economy in Ionia 369 19. Accustomed to Obedience: “Decadent” Ionia and the Reputation for Martial Weakness 386 20. Between Local and Global: Ionian Intellectuals and the Aegean World 405 IV. Conclusions 439 Bibliography 445 Vita 488 iv Note to the reader The transliteration of Greek names and places in English is a chronic problem. I have chosen to anglicize Greek names except where common usage dictates otherwise (e.g. “Teos,” rather than “Teus”) and in some cases of Greek terms that will be apparent in the text. I have provided the original Greek texts and vocabulary as well as translations throughout this thesis. Translations of ancient sources, including inscriptions are identified in the notes; all unattributed translations are my own. All dates are BCE, unless otherwise noted. Abbreviations Names of journals are abbreviated as in L’Année Philologique. The following abbreviations are used for ancient authors: Aelian VH Aelian, Varia Historia Aristoph. Aristophanes Aristoph. Lys. Aristophanes, Lysistrata Arist. Aristotle Arist. Pol. Aristotle, Politics [Arist.] Oec. Pseudo-Aristotle, Oeconimica Arr. Arrian, Anabasis Arr. Arrian, History of the Successors Athen. Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae Curt. Quintus Curtius Rufus Dem. Demosthenes Din. Dinarchus Diod. Diodorus Siculus Diog. Laert. Diogenes Laertius Hdt. Herodotus Isoc. Isocrates Mor. Moralia Pausanias Pausanias, Description of Greece Pliny NH Pliny, Natural History Plut. Ages. Plutarch, Life of Agesilaus Plut. Alex. Plutarch, Life of Alexander Plut. Arist. Plutarch, Life of Aristides Plut. Artax. Plutarch, Life of Artaxerxes Plut. Demet. Plutarch, Life of Demetrius Plut. Dem. Plutarch, Life of Demosthenes Plut. Lys. Plutarch, Life of Lysander Plut. Per. Plutarch, Life of Pericles [Plut.] Pseudo-Plutarch v Polyaenus Polyaenus, Strategemata Strabo Strabo, Geography Theophrastus HP Theophrastus, History of Plants Thuc. Thucydides Xen. Ages. Xenophon, Agesilaus Xen. Anab. Xenophon, Anabasis Xen. Hell. Xenophon, Hellenica [Xen.] Ath. Pol. Pseudo-Xenophon, Athenaion Politeia The following abbreviations are used for frequently cited modern works: Ager S.L. Ager, Interstate Arbitrations in the Greek World, 337-90 B.C. (Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997) ATL 1-3 B.D. Meritt, H.T. Wade-Gery, and M.F. McGregor, The Athenian Tribute Lists, 4 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1939-1953) BNJ I. Worthington (editor-in-chief), Brill's New Jacoby (online, Leiden: Brill, 2007- ) Bosworth, HCA I A.B.
Recommended publications
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop
    The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop N THE ANABASIS, Xenophon asserts that the Persian prince Cyrus the Younger was falsely accused of plotting a coup I d’état against King Artaxerxes II shortly after his accession to the throne in 404 BCE. Spared from execution by the Queen Mother Parysatis, Cyrus returned to Lydia determined to seize the throne for himself. He secretly prepared his rebellion by securing access to thousands of Greek hoplites, winning over Persian officials and most of the Greek cities of Ionia, and continuing to send tribute and assurances of his loyalty to the unsuspecting King (1.1).1 In Xenophon’s timeline, the rebellion was not official until sometime between the muster of his army at Sardis in spring 401, which spurred his rival Tissaphernes to warn Artaxerxes (1.2.4–5), and his arrival several months later at Thapsacus on the Euphrates, where Cyrus first openly an- nounced his true intentions (1.4.11). Questioning the “strange blindness” of Artaxerxes in light of Cyrus’ seemingly obvious preparations for revolt, Pierre Briant proposed an alternative timeline placing the outbreak of the rebellion almost immediately after Cyrus’ return to Sardis in late 404 or early 403.2 In his reconstruction, the King allowed Cyrus 1 See also Ctesias FGrHist 688 F 16.59, Diod. 14.19, Plut. Artax. 3–4. 2 Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander (Winona Lake 2002) 617–620. J. K. Anderson, Xenophon (New York 1974) 80, expresses a similar skepticism. Briant concludes his discussion by stating that the rebellion officially (Briant does not define “official,” but I take it to mean when either the King or Cyrus declared it publicly) began in 401 with the muster of Cyrus’ army at Sardis, but it is nonetheless appropriate to characterize Briant’s position as dating the official outbreak of the revolt to 404/3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICAL CHANGES in IONIA AFTER the REVOLT ßß42 And
    APPENDIX 11 THE POLITICAL CHANGES IN IONIA AFTER THE REVOLT §§42 and 43.3 throw important light on the Persian attitude to their subject peoples in the west, and certainly on Artaphrenes as a shrewd administrator. The revolt had taken six years and considerable mil- itary effort to suppress. Three political changes are now made, two by the satrap, the third by Mardonius. Another account of it sur- vives, DS 10.25.4, where the third is also ascribed to Artaphrenes: ÑEkata›ow ı MilÆsiow presbeutØw épestalm°now ÍpÚ t«n ÉI≈nvn, ±r≈thse diÉ ∂n afit¤an épiste› aÈto›w ı ÉArtaf°rnhw. toË d¢ efipÒntow, mÆpote Íp¢r œn katapolemhy°ntew kak«w ¶payon mnhsikakÆsvsin, OÈkoËn, ¶fhsen, efi tÚ pepony°nai kak«w tØn épist¤an peripoie›, tÚ paye›n êra eÔ poiÆsei tåw pÒleiw P°rsaiw eÈnooÊsaw. épodejãmenow d¢ tÚ =hy¢n ı ÉArtaf°rnhw ép°dvke toÁw nÒmouw ta›w pÒlesi ka‹ taktoÁw fÒrouw katå dÊnamin §p°tajen.1 Artaphrenes had to reimpose his authority, but also had the practical interest of ensuring stability, particularly economic stability, which in turn meant that tribute could flow in: cf Starr (1975) 82, Briant (1996) 511, and other references cited on êndrew, §19.3. We may accept §42.1, that he summoned representatives from each polis, in view of the arbitration requirement; but we can accept Diodorus to the extent that Hecataeus was the, or one of the, representative(s) from Miletus: he had influence there, and could be presented to the Persians as someone who had not fully supported the revolt (5.36, 125; pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict?
    Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict? Maria Natasha Ioannou Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy Discipline of Classics School of Humanities The University of Adelaide December 2012 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................ III Declaration........................................................................................................... IV Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. V Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1. Overview .......................................................................................................... 1 2. Background and Context ................................................................................. 1 3. Thesis Aims ..................................................................................................... 3 4. Thesis Summary .............................................................................................. 4 5. Literature Review ............................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1: Cyprus Considered .......................................................................... 14 1.1 Cyprus’ Internal Dynamics ........................................................................... 15 1.2 Cyprus, Phoenicia and Egypt .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Because of the Number of Articles Contained in This Work and Because They Span Both the Greek and Roman Worlds, We Ha
    INDEX Nota Bene: Because of the number of articles contained in this work and because they span both the Greek and Roman worlds, we have made no effort to stan­ dardize the spelling of transliterated Greek names from one article to the next. Therefore we advise you to check under variant spellings as you seek something from this index. Ab-ad-Dud: 375 Alexander the Great: 304 n. 11, Abdera: 189, 2ll 307-8, 314 Abu Simbel: 239 Alexandra (Kassandra): 131-51 Abydos: 240 Alexandre (Amazonian): 137 Academy: 292 n. 34, 296-7 Alexandria (Egypt): 238 n. 27, 350 n. 44 Achaea: 118, 125, 137 n. 39 Alexandros (Hera): 136 n. 35 Achaemenes/ Achaemenids: 36, 30 l-14 Alexandros (Paris): 136 Achilles: 232 Alexida: 136 n. 32 Actium, Batde of: 102, 339-55 Allienoi: 235 Adeimantus: 38 n. 15 Allies, Greek, see 'Xenos' Aegean Sea: 187, 239, 241 Allies, Roman, see 'Foederatei' Aegina/Aeginetans: 35, 37, 39, 257, 307 Allotment: 197, 207, 215 Aegospotami: 324 al-Mgawga: 375 Aelius Tubero, Q: 99-102 Altar: 198, 204, 206, 261 Aeolians: 273 n. 5 Amaklaios (Apollo): 139 Aequians: II 0 Amasis: 238 Aeschylus: 34 n. 4, 293 Amazons: 137, 232 Mrica Proconsularis: 120 n. 28 Ambracian Gulf: 350 Agamemnon (hero): 131, 133-5, Amisos: 190 140-5, 148-51, 232 Amoibichos: 240 Agamemnon (Zeus): 135 n. 23 Amompharetus: 44 Agesilaus: 259, 293 n. 36, 301 Ampe: 182, 184 Agis: 285-6, 288-90, 294-5, 297-8 Amphiaraos: 136 n. 32 Agora: 120, 198, 200, 202-3 Amphictyonic League: 125 Agrippa, see 'Vipsanius' Amphinnes: 238 Agrippa Menenius: I 02 Amphipolis: 208, 293 Aigisthos: 147 n.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Metropolis at Athens 15
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2011 The Littleetr M opolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia Paul Brazinski Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Brazinski, Paul, "The Little eM tropolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia" (2011). Honors Theses. 12. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/12 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paul A. Brazinski iv Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank Professor Larson for her patience and thoughtful insight throughout the writing process. She was a tremendous help in editing as well, however, all errors are mine alone. This endeavor could not have been done without you. I would also like to thank Professor Sanders for showing me the fruitful possibilities in the field of Frankish archaeology. I wish to thank Professor Daly for lighting the initial spark for my classical and byzantine interests as well as serving as my archaeological role model. Lastly, I would also like to thank Professor Ulmer, Professor Jones, and all the other Professors who have influenced me and made my stay at Bucknell University one that I will never forget. This thesis is dedicated to my Mom, Dad, Brian, Mark, and yes, even Andrea. Paul A. Brazinski v Table of Contents Abstract viii Introduction 1 History 3 Byzantine Architecture 4 The Little Metropolis at Athens 15 Merbaka 24 Agioi Theodoroi 27 Hagiography: The Saints Theodores 29 Iconography & Cultural Perspectives 35 Conclusions 57 Work Cited 60 Appendix & Figures 65 Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • PYGELA DOGU LİKYA DAGLARI'nda YENİ Keşfedilen KÜÇÜK BİR KENT
    • • ı Anadolu' da Hosios Ka i Dikaios Kültü (Kutsal ve Adil Tanrı) Eda Akyürek Şahin ıg Principatus Devri'nde Roma'nın Vergi Politikası II Efrumiye Ertekin 27 Bilim Üretmeyen Uygarlık Evrensel Değildir Batı Uygarlığı ve Anadolu Sencer Şahin 36 Hellenogalatia 1 Mehmet Ali Kaya 43 Pygela Doğu Likya Dağları'nda Yeni Keşfedilen Küçük Bir Kent Mustafa Adak- Nihai Tüter sı Bizans Dönemi'nde Cam Yapımı ve Süslemesi Özgü Çömezoğlu 64 Kavak Köyü Mezarı Kapadokya'da Bir Kaya Mezarının Kimliğini Tanımlama Çalışması Raoul Blanchard - Pierre Couprie 71 Doğu Hristiyan Sanatında Melekler 1 A. Özmen Özdemiroğlu 76 Orta Asya'da Eksantrik Bir Yapı: Magak-ı Attari Camii 1 İbrahim Çeşmeli 86 Karahanlı Devri Orta Asya Türk Seramik Sanatı Üzerine 1 Yaşar Çoruhlu ıo4 Tokat Çöreğibüyük Köyü Türbesi 1 Osman Eravşar 110 XIX. Yüzyılın Sonu ve XX. Yüzyılın Başında Kullanılan Çapraz Konumlu Hilal Alemler Kadriye Figen Vardar 113 Nekroloji: Gündağ Kayaoğlu 1 Selçuk Mülayim 114 Eski Çağ Tarihinde Kilikya'nın Doğal Kaynaklarının Anadolu-Mezopotamya ilişkisindeki Rolü Mehmet Kurt 118 Etkinlik: Mountains and Valleys Symposium ı2ı Bir Sözlük Nasıl Olmamalı? 1 Erkan Ildız PYGELA DOGU LİKYA DAGLARI'NDA YENİ KEŞFEDiLEN KÜÇÜK BİR KENT MUSTAFA ADAK*- NlHAL TÜNER** 1993 yılmda Patara'da ele geçen ve tmparator saptanmış bulunmaktadır. 1 Bu saptama, Likya Claudius zamanmda (1.5. 41-54) Ukya Bölge• tarihi coğrafyasını kökten değiştirecek bir öne• si'nin Roma Eyaleti'ne dönüştürülmesiyle bir­ me sahiptir. likte başlayan kapsamlı bir yol yapım projesini Kısıtlı imkanlada gerçekleştirdiğimiz Stadias­ içeren Patara Yol Listesi (Stacliasmtıs Patarensis), mus Patarensis Yüzey Araştırmaları, bir epigra­ bilim dünyasmda 20. yüzyılın en büyük epi­ fik belgenin içerdiği bilgilerin arazide hala sap­ grafik buluntularından biri olarak kabul edil­ tanabilcliğine dair iyi bir örnek sunmaktadır.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazons, Thracians, and Scythians , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 24:2 (1983:Summer) P.105
    SHAPIRO, H. A., Amazons, Thracians, and Scythians , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 24:2 (1983:Summer) p.105 Amazons, Thracians, and Scythians H A. Shapiro HE AMAZONS offer a remarkable example of the lacunose and T fragmented state of ancient evidence for many Greek myths. For while we hear virtually nothing about them in extant litera­ ture before the mid-fifth century, they are depicted in art starting in the late eighth! and are extremely popular, especially in Attica, from the first half of the sixth. Thus all we know about the Greeks' con­ ception of the Amazons in the archaic period comes from visual rep­ resentations, not from written sources, and it would be hazardous to assume that various 'facts' and details supplied by later writers were familiar to the sixth-century Greek. The problem of locating the Amazons is a good case in point. Most scholars assume that Herakles' battle with the Amazons, so popular on Attic vases, took place at the Amazon city Themiskyra in Asia Minor, on the river Thermodon near the Black Sea, where most ancient writers place it.2 But the earliest of these is Apollodoros (2.5.9), and, as I shall argue, alternate traditions locating the Ama­ zons elsewhere may have been known to the archaic vase-painter and viewer. An encounter with Amazons figures among the exploits of three important Greek heroes, and each story entered the Attic vase­ painters' repertoire at a different time in the course of the sixth century. First came Herakles' battle to obtain the girdle of Hippolyte (although the prize itself is never shown), his ninth labor.
    [Show full text]
  • Xenophon's Life and Times: Some Important Dates
    Xenophon Anabasis Xenophon’s Life and Times: Some Important Dates BC 431 Outbreak of Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta 430 – 425 Birth of Xenophon (in Athens) 423 Birth of Cyrus the Younger 413 Destruction of the Athenian expedition to Sicily 411 – 410 Athenian democracy overthrown, and oligarchic rule imposed (The 400) 410 Democracy restored at Athens 407 Cyrus becomes viceroy of Asia Minor 406 Athenian victory at the Battle of Arginusae, and the subsequent trial of the generals. 405 Artaxerxes II (elder brother of Cyrus) succeeds to the throne of Persia The Athenian fleet is destroyed by Lysander at Aegospotami 404 Athens surrenders to Sparta The Thirty Tyrants are established at Athens Xenophon serves in their cavalry (?) 401 Xenophon joins the expedition of Cyrus the Younger who is defeated at the Battle of Cunaxa (near Babylon) Xenophon becomes a general and the Ten Thousand begin their retreat 400 The Ten Thousand reach the Black Sea, and continue their retreat to Byzantium Agesilaus becomes one of Sparta’s two kings 400 – 399 Xenophon and the Ten Thousand with Seuthes in Thrace 399 Xenophon brings the remnant of the Ten Thousand to join the Spartan Thibron in Asia Minor Socrates is tried and executed in Athens 399 – 394 Xenophon serves under the Spartans in Asia Minor 395 Outbreak of the Corinthian War: Athens, Corinth and Thebes in coalition against Sparta 394 Agesilaus is recalled from Asia Minor to Greece; Xenophon accompanies him Xenophon fights with Sparta at Coronea; he is formally exiled from Athens (if not already
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaries, Poleis, and Empires in the Fourth Century Bce
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ALL THE KING’S GREEKS: MERCENARIES, POLEIS, AND EMPIRES IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BCE A Dissertation in History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies by Jeffrey Rop © 2013 Jeffrey Rop Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 ii The dissertation of Jeffrey Rop was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Munn Professor of Ancient Greek History and Greek Archaeology, Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Gary N. Knoppers Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Religious Studies, and Jewish Studies Garrett G. Fagan Professor of Ancient History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Kenneth Hirth Professor of Anthropology Carol Reardon George Winfree Professor of American History David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Graduate Program Director for the Department of History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Greek mercenary service in the Near East from 401- 330 BCE. Traditionally, the employment of Greek soldiers by the Persian Achaemenid Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt during this period has been understood to indicate the military weakness of these polities and the superiority of Greek hoplites over their Near Eastern counterparts. I demonstrate that the purported superiority of Greek heavy infantry has been exaggerated by Greco-Roman authors. Furthermore, close examination of Greek mercenary service reveals that the recruitment of Greek soldiers was not the purpose of Achaemenid foreign policy in Greece and the Aegean, but was instead an indication of the political subordination of prominent Greek citizens and poleis, conducted through the social institution of xenia, to Persian satraps and kings.
    [Show full text]