DOCSLIB.ORG

Civilian Personnel Regulations AMENDMENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civilian Personnel Regulations AMENDMENTS NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION Civilian Personnel Regulations AMENDMENTS Record of amendments Strike out corresponding number as each amendment is inserted 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Design and lay-out : NATO Graphics Studio APRIL 2005 CONTENTS 1 Amdt 25 / June 2016 Contents Preamble PART ONE Article RULES GOVERNING MEMBERS OF THE STAFF Chapter I - Recruitment and employment 1 - 3 Chapter II - Appointments, assignments and contracts 4 - 6 Chapter III - Separation 7 - 11 Chapter IV - Obligations and responsibilities 12 - 14 Chapter V - Work 15 - 17 Chapter VI - Security 18 - 21 Chapter VII - Salaries, allowances, supplements, advances and loans 22 - 36 Chapter VIII - Travel and removal 37 - 41 Chapter IX - Leave 42 - 46 Chapter X - Social securities and insurances 47 - 51 Chapter XI - Provident Fund 52 - 54 Chapter XII - Reports, performance assessment, 55 - 58 grades, advancement, changes of post or grade Chapter XIII - Discipline 59 - 60 Chapter XIV - Administrative review, complaints and appeals 61 - 62 Chapter XV - Pension Schemes 63 - 67 2 CONTENTS APRIL 2005 Amdt 25 / June 2016 PART TWO RULES APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANTS AND TEMPORARY PERSONNEL Chapter XVI - Consultants 68 - 76 Chapter XVII - Temporary personnel 77 - 87 PART THREE STAFF REPRESENTATION Chapter XVIII - Staff Associations and Staff Committees 88 - 90 PART FOUR ANNEXES 1.A. Agreement on the status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, national representatives and international staff (Part IV) 1.B. Protocol on the status of international military headquarters (Articles 2 to 8) II. Procedure for adjusting emoluments III. Allowances/Supplements III.A Reserved III.B Kilometric allowance for travel by private vehicle III.C Education allowance: rules for the reimbursement of educational costs III.D Indemnity for handicapped child and reimbursement of educational or training expenses related to the handicap III.E Regulations concerning the rent allowance III.F Regulations to standardise the conditions of employment of men and women III.G Basic family allowance III.H Dependent child supplement III.I Supplements for disabled or severely disabled child III.J Supplement for disabled and dependent parent III.K Method of adjustment for the allowances/supplements expressed in absolute value APRIL 2005 CONTENTS 3 Amdt 8 / April 2012 IV. Rules of the Coordinated Pension Scheme V. Regulations on the indemnity for loss of job VI. Regulations governing the NATO Defined Contribution Pension Scheme VII. Regulations governing the Provident Fund VIII. Basic principles of performance management and criteria for performance assessment IX. Regulations governing administrative review, mediation, complaints and appeals X. Disciplinary powers and procedures XI. Joint Consultative Board XII. Part-time work and job-sharing XIII. Retirees' Medical Claims Fund XIV. Participation of international civilian personnel in Council- approved operations and missions XV. Regulations for continued employment beyond the age limit PART FIVE INDEX (to be published later) APRIL 2005 PREAMBLE 1 Amdt 12 / May 2013 Preamble A. Applicability (i) These Civilian Personnel Regulations are applicable throughout the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and shall govern personnel administration in each NATO body for personnel of the following classes: international civilian personnel consultants temporary (civilian) personnel (ii) These Regulations do not apply to military personnel (other than those seconded to civilian posts), national experts lent by their governments on a non-reimbursable basis, or local civilian labour (known as Local Wage Rate (LWR) civilians). The terms of employment of LWR civilians will be set out in their contracts of employment and will comply with the conditions of work, wages, supplementary payments, etc., laid down in the legislation and regulations applicable in the host country. (iii) Compliance with these Regulations, except as specified in agreements concluded between the member government concerned and the Secretary General or Supreme Allied Commander as appropriate, is likewise incumbent on nationals of a country which has elected to avail itself of the special provisions of Article 19 of the Agreement on the status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, national representatives and international staff or Article 7(2) of the Protocol on the status of international military headquarters. (iv) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph E (x) below, the contractual rights of staff members in post on the date on which these Regulations come into force shall be maintained. 2 PREAMBLE APRIL 2005 Amdt 22 / August 2015 B. Definitions (v) For purposes of these Regulations, the following phrases have the meanings indicated : (a) NATO bodies - means all civilian and military headquarters, agencies and other organizational units established pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty and fully financed through international budgets. (b) Head of NATO body - means the senior responsible officer of any NATO body to which either the Agreement on the status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, national representatives and international staff signed in Ottawa on 20 th September, 1951 or the Protocol on the status of international military headquarters set up pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty signed in Paris on 28 th August, 1952 applies and which employs international civilian personnel. (c) International civilian personnel, staff, or members of the staff - means personnel of a NATO body recruited from among the nationals of members of the Alliance and appointed to the Organization and assigned to international posts appearing on the approved establishment of that NATO body. (d) Consultant - means a recognized expert or specialist engaged, normally from among nationals of the members of the Alliance, to serve in an advisory capacity not provided for by the establishment approved for the NATO body concerned. (e) Temporary personnel or temporary staff - means personnel engaged from among nationals of the members of the Alliance to satisfy temporary requirements of the Organization (e.g. to replace members of the staff who are absent, to undertake tasks temporarily in excess of the capacity of the establishment approved for the NATO body concerned, to ensure that the personnel establishment can be managed in a flexible way and necessary work requirements can be sustained during reorganizations). (f) Seconded staff - means those international civilian personnel recruited, with the concurrence of the national authorities concerned : i. from a national administration, public institution or the armed forces of a NATO member state, who retain a formal link with the administration, institution or armed forces from which they were recruited; or ii. who are made available to serve as international civilian personnel under arrangements concluded with the Council under Article 19 of the Agreement on the status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, national representatives and international staff or Article 7.2 of the Protocol on the status of international military headquarters set up pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty. The extent to which the Civilian Personnel Regulations apply to staff seconded under these provisions may be set out in arrangements between the Organization and the Member state concerned. (g) Retired NATO staff, member of the retired NATO staff – means APRIL 2005 PREAMBLE 3 Amdt 23 / November 2015 former members of the staff who have served with a NATO Body in one or more of the categories described in paragraphs (c), (d), (e) and (f). (h) Spouse: i. The person with whom a staff member has entered into a marital relationship, as defined, recognized, and regulated by a national public authority; or ii. Officials who have entered into a partnership organizing the conditions of their marital relationship registered with a national public authority shall be considered as married officials and their partners as spouses, provided that all the following conditions are met: • neither of the partners is married or has already entered into another registered partnership; • the kinship between the partners does not preclude their marriage; • the couple as such does not legally have access to civil marriage under the legislation of the State of which the official is a national or of the country of residence of the couple. C. Responsibilities and authority (vi) The Heads of NATO bodies (as defined in paragraph B(v)(a) above) are responsible for ensuring that these Regulations are faithfully applied within their respective organizational units. To this end the term « Secretary General » or « Secretaries General of the Coordinated Organizations » shall mean, in a text which has been approved for common application in the Coordinated Organizations and which is reproduced in an annex to the Regulations, the Head of the NATO body to which the staff member belongs or to which the former staff member belonged, except where otherwise specified. For specific situations not covered by these Regulations, the Heads of NATO bodies (1) will consult the Advisory Panel on Administration, established by the Secretary General (2) before taking a final decision. (vii) To this end they are authorized : (a) to take such steps as are necessary to establish, consistent with the provisions of these Regulations, more detailed rules and procedures to ensure effective, efficient and economical administration and utilization of civilian personnel within the organizational units headed by them; (b) to designate the official or officials authorized to exercise the powers and authorities relative to civilian personnel vested in them by these or other regulations. (1) This authority is reserved to SACEUR in respect of members of the staff employed by NATO bodies within Allied Command Operations and to SACT in respect of members of the staff employed by NATO bodies within Allied Command Transformation. (2) See Council decision on C-M(2009)0079.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Formation of Nato and Turkish Bids for Membership
    AKADEMİK YAKLAŞIMLAR DERGİSİ JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC APPROACHES KIŞ 2010 CİLT:1 SAYI:1 WINTER 2010 VOLUME:1 ISSUE:1 FROM NEUTRALITY TO ALIGNMENT: THE FORMATION OF NATO AND TURKISH BIDS FOR MEMBERSHIP Abdulkadir BAHARÇİÇEK* Abstract The formation of NATO was a responce by the United States to the security questions of the Western Europe and North Atlantic region. Turkey also faced with a serious threat from the Soviet Union. Turkey‟s attempts of entering NATO shaped Turkish security polices as well as her relations with the rest of the world. Turkish membership to NATO can be regarded a solution to her security problems, but it may well be argued that the main cause behind that policy was the continuation of the polices of westernization and modernization. The obvious short term factor behind Turkish desire was the Soviet threat. But at the same time the ideolojical aspirations in becoming an integral part- at least in term of military alliance- of Western world without any doubt played a decisive role in Turkey‟s decision. Özet İkinci Dünya Savaşı‟ndan sonra Avrupa‟da ortaya çıkan yeni güvenlik sorunları ve özellikle Batı Avrupa‟ya da yönelen Sovyet tehdidine karşı ABD‟nin öncülüğünde NATO ittifakı kuruldu. Aynı dönemde Türkiye‟de kendisini Sovyet tehdidi altında görüyordu. Türkiye‟nin NATO‟ya girme çabaları Türkiye‟nin güvenlik politikalarını ve Batı ile olan ilişkilerini de şekillendirdi. NATO üyeliği, Türkiye açısından, güvenlik sorunlarına bir çözüm olarak görülebilir, fakat bu üye olma arzusunun arkasında modernleşme ve batılılaşma ideolojisinin bulunduğunu söylemek de yanlış olmayacaktır. Kısa dönemde Sovyet tehdidine karşı koymanın hesapları yapılırken, uzun vadede Batı sisteminin ayrılmaz bir parçası olma arzusunun Türk karar alıcılarının temel düşüncesi olduğu söylenebilir.
    [Show full text]
  • Support of International Military Activities”
    DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * May 2011 SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES TO DOD 7000.14-R, VOLUME 11A, CHAPTER 9 “SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES” All changes are denoted by blue font Substantive revisions are denoted by a * preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Hyperlinks are denoted by underlined, bold, italic, blue font PARA EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Table 9-1 Adds/updates support organization names, locations and designated Add administrative agents in accordance with European Command and Joint Staff review. Table 9-1 Provides administrative updates based on extensive North Atlantic Update Treaty Organization restructure. 9-1 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * May 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES 0901 Overview 0902 General 0903 Responsibilities 0904 Policy and Procedures 0905 Scope of Budget for International Military Headquarters and Agencies * Table 1 International Military Headquarter and Related Agencies and Administrative Agents Responsible for Their Support and for Support to U.S. Elements 9-2 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * May 2011 CHAPTER 9 SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES 0901 OVERVIEW 090101. Purpose. This chapter: A. Establishes administrative arrangements, reimbursement, and billing procedures, and identifies a method to compute the dollar value of credits due the United States (U.S.) for the support of international military activities. B. Assigns responsibilities for the support of international organizations, and identifies reimbursable and nonreimbursable support. C. Identifies the support that DoD Components can expect to receive from international military organizations and whether such support is on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017
    DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017 VOLUME 11A, CHAPTER 9 “SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES” SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by a (*) preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Unless otherwise noted, chapters referenced are contained in this volume. Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue and underlined font. The previous version dated May 2015 is archived. PARAGRAPH EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Added an overview section to comply with the Department of Defense (DoD) Financial Management Regulation (FMR) 090101 Addition Revision Standard Operating Procedures, dated June 15, 2015. 090201 Added definition for “DoD Component.” Addition 090202 Added definition for “Unified Combatant Command.” Addition Added a reference to the National Security Act of 1947 and 090204 Revision to the Joint Publication 1-02. 090206 Added definition for “Military Element.” Addition Added definition for a “Table of Organization and 090211 Addition Equipment.” Expanded the use of United States (U.S.) appropriated funds for U.S. military personnel who are members of an 090507.B.2. Addition international military headquarters that does not maintain a centralized international budget for such purposes. Added six North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Unit (NFIU) support elements at Tallinn, Table 9-1, Estonia; Riga, Latvia; Vilnius, Lithuania; Bydgoszcz, Addition paragraph A.4.f. Poland; Szekesfeharvar, Hungary; and Bratislava, Slovakia as approved by the NATO Defense Ministers on September 5, 2014. Moved from section A.2.g the Headquarters, Multinational Table 9-1, Division South-East at Bucharest, Romania and two NFIU Revision paragraph A.4.r.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty: Past, Present, and Uncertain Future
    NOTES ARTICLE 5 OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY: PAST, PRESENT, AND UNCERTAIN FUTURE Broderick C. Grady* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 169 II. THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY: ITS ORIGINS AND PRECEDENTS... 171 A. The Atlantic Charter .................................. 171 B. The Brussels Treaty .................................. 173 C. The Rio Pact ........................................ 174 D. The Formationof the North Atlantic Treaty ................ 175 MI. ARTICLE 5: CONTEXT AND MEANING ........................ 177 IV. THE LIMITATIONS ON ARTICLE 5: ARTICLE 6 AND THE UN CHARTER .......................... 180 V. ARTICLE 5: THE PRESENT: SEPTEMBER 11 AND THE INVOCATION OF ARTICLE 5 ............................................. 185 A. Problems with the Invocation After 9/11 .................. 185 B. Difficulties in Invoking Article 5 Against TerroristGroups ..................................... 187 C. Did Article 5 Need to Be Invoked at All? .................. 188 * J.D. 2003, University of Georgia School of Law; B.A. 1999, Washington & Lee University. 168 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. [Vol. 31:167 VI. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF ARTICLE 5: CONCLUSIONS ......... 193 A. Does the Invocation of Article 5 Have any Value as Legal Precedent? ............................. 193 B. Invoking Article 5 in the Future ......................... 197 20021 ARTICLE 5 OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY I. INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the United States government acted to combat terrorism and bring those who supported the perpetrators of the attacks to justice.' President George W. Bush created the position of Director of Homeland Security, naming former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge to the post;' Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, containing several anti-terrorism provisions;3 and throughout the country, officials took steps to tighten security at likely targets, including airports, sporting events, and government buildings." The United States was not alone, however, in responding to the tragedy of September 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organization the Origins of NATO the NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION
    The Origins of N A TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION European Economic Recovery power production), and dollar reserves to pay for necessary and European Integration imports. The war had rent the social fabric of many nations, setting social class against social class and ethnic group n the aftermath of the total defeat of Nazi Germany in against ethnic group. Political tensions were exacerbated by 1945, Europe struggled to recover from the ravages of the participation of many Europeans in collaborationist occupation and war. The wartime Grand Alliance be- regimes and others in armed resistance. Masses of Europe- tweenI the Western democracies and the Soviet Union ans, radicalized by the experience of war and German collapsed, and postwar negotiations for a peace settlement occupation, demanded major social and economic change foundered in the Council of Foreign Ministers. By 1947 and appeared ready to enforce these demands with violence. peace treaties with Italy and the defeated Axis satellites were The national Communist Parties of Western Europe stood finally concluded after protracted and acrimonious negotia- ready to exploit this discontent in order to advance the aims tions between the former allies, but the problem of a divided of the Soviet Union.2 and occupied Germany remained unsettled. U.S. leaders were acutely aware of both the dangers of In April 1947 Secretary of State George Marshall re- renewed conflict in Europe and of their ability to influence turned from a frustrating round of negotiations in the the shape of a postwar European political and social order. Council of Foreign Ministers in Moscow to report that the Fresh from the wartime experience of providing major United States and the Soviet Union were at loggerheads over Lend-Lease aid to allied nations and assistance to millions of a prescription for the future of central Europe and that the refugees through the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Soviets appeared ready to drag out talks.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 541 BELGIUM, CANADA, DENMARK, FRANCE, ICELAND
    No. 541 BELGIUM, CANADA, DENMARK, FRANCE, ICELAND, ITALY, LUXEMBOURG, NETHERLANDS, NORWAY, PORTUGAL, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA North Atlantic Treaty. Signed at Washington, on 4 April 1949 English and French official texts communicated by the Permanent Representa tive of the United States of America at the seat of the United Nations. The registration took place on 7 September 1949. BELGIQUE, CANADA, DANEMARK, FRANCE, ISLANDE, ITALIE, LUXEMBOURG, PAYS-BAS, NORVEGE, PORTUGAL, ROYAUME-UNI DE GRANDE-BRETAGNE ET D©IRLANDE DU NORD et ETATS-UNIS D©AMERIQUE Trait de l©Atlantique Nord. Sign Washington, le 4 avril 1949 Textes officiels anglais et français communiqués par le représentant permanent des Etats-Unis d'Amérique au siège de l'Organisation des Nations Unies. L'enregistrement a eu lieu le 7 septembre 1949. 244 United Nations — Treaty Series_________1949 No. 541. NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY1. SIGNED AT WASH INGTON, ON 4 APRIL 1949 The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments. They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilization of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area. They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defense and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty: Article 1 The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international disputes in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark Last Updated: July 2021
    Denmark Last Updated: July 2021 CYBERSECURITY POLICY Strategy Documents Danish Cyber and Information Security Strategy 2018-2021 Ministry of Finance Introduces 25 initiatives organized in 3 benchmarks: 1. Everyday Safety for Citizens and Businesses: Central government together with critical sectors is enhancing its technological preparedness as the threat scenario evolves in order to be able to protect essential societal functions against cyberattacks or other major information security incidents; 2. Better Competencies: Citizens, businesses and authorities have access to the requisite knowledge and are qualified to address the increasing level of cyber and information security challenges; and 3. Joint Efforts: Risk-based security management is an integral part of central government management and management of critical sectors. there must be a clear division of roles and responsibilities in the area of cyber and information security for authorities and businesses providing key societal functions. Source Source 2 2018-2021 Digital Strategy 2016-2020 Agency for Digitalisation (Digitaliseringsstyrelsen) Three main goals with three focus areas each: 1. Digital solutions must be easy-to-use, quick and ensure high quality 2. Digitalisation must provide good conditions for growth 3. Security and confidence must be in focus at all times Source May 2016 A Strong Defence of Denmark: Proposal for New Defence Agreement 2018 – 2023 Ministry of Defence Calls for capability for military operations in cyberspace, including the ability to protect own network infrastructure, and also to affect opponents’ use of cyberspace. To establish a Centre for Cyber Security under the Ministry of Defence To further develop a Computer Network Operations (CNO) capability in order to provide a capacity that can execute defensive and offensive military operations in cyberspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope and Historical Developments of Article 6
    Emory International Law Review Volume 34 Issue 0 The North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Seventieth Anniversary 2019 Scope and Historical Developments of Article 6 Antoaneta Boeva Ivan Novotny Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr Recommended Citation Antoaneta Boeva & Ivan Novotny, Scope and Historical Developments of Article 6, 34 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 121 (2019). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol34/iss0/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory International Law Review by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOVOTNYBOEVAPROOFS2_10.24.19 11/19/2019 10:02 AM SCOPE AND HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS OF ARTICLE 6† Antoaneta Boeva* Ivan Novotny** Article 61 For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack: 1. on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France,2 on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer; 2. on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.3 INTRODUCTION As stressed many times in this special series of articles and commentaries, the North Atlantic Treaty (“Treaty”), which celebrates its 70th anniversary this year, is in many ways unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway and Nato at 50*
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS March - May 1999 Volume IV - Number 1 NORWAY AND NATO AT 50* SVERRE LODGAARD Sverre Lodgaard is Director of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. THE HERITAGE Norway has been a member of the Atlantic Alliance since its inception. It has been a loyal member, often named ‘best in the class.’ There is no rule without exceptions, however, during President Reagan’s rearmament drive in the 1980s, Norway entered the list of so-called footnote countries on the Strategic Defence Initiative (popularly referred to as ‘Star Wars’) issue, and the social democratic party joined its European sister parties in opposing the deployment of new intermediate-range missiles on European soil. To forge a broad national consensus on the membership issue and soften Soviet reactions, the government won acceptance for one restraint from the very beginning: it did not allow the stationing of foreign troops on Norwegian soil. Neither did it allow the stationing of nuclear weapons when, some years later, the United States began to deploy such weapons in Europe. Since the restrictions were self-imposed—not in any way subject to international agreement—the government was free to lift them in times of crises and war. Other restrictions, on the pattern of military exercises, were instituted as well. None of them caused severe tension in relation to Alliance partners as the Allies had no specific plans for doing what the government prohibited. Also, the Allies judged the special Norwegian combination of deterrence and reassurance as reasonable and, over the years, ways were found to circumvent the restraints, eg.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Treaty- the Greece-Turkey Protocol (London, 22 October 1951)
    North Atlantic Treaty- The Greece-Turkey Protocol (London, 22 October 1951) Caption: The Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty relating to the accession of Greece and Turkey is signed in London on 22 October 1951. On 18 February 1952, Greece and Turkey officially become members of NATO. Source: LORD ISMAY, Hastings Lionel. NATO, The First Five Years. Brussels: NATO, 1954. 280 p. Copyright: (c) OTAN / NATO URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/north_atlantic_treaty_the_greece_turkey_protocol_london_22_october_1951-en- 1417f67e-0ef3-497f-a564-3e8e8b48e45d.html Publication date: 14/05/2013 1 / 2 14/05/2013 The Greece-Turkey Protocol (London, 22 October 1951) The Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at Washington on 4th April, 1949, Being satisfied that the security of the North Atlantic area will be enhanced by the accession of the Kingdom of Greece and the Republic of Turkey to that Treaty, Agree as follows: ARTICLE I Upon the entry in force of this Protocol, the Government of the United States of America shall, on behalf of all the Parties, communicate to the Government of the Kingdom of Greece and the Government of the Republic of Turkey an invitation to accede to the North Atlantic Treaty, as it may be modified by Article II of the present Protocol. Thereafter the Kingdom of Greece and the Republic of Turkey shall each become a Party on the date when it deposits its instruments of accession with the Government of the United States of America in accordance with Article 10 of the Treaty. ARTICLE II If the Republic of Turkey becomes a Party
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Diversity and Inclusion Report 2018
    ANNEX 1 Annual Diversity and Inclusion Report 2018 1-1 ANNEX 1 Executive Summary 1. The purpose of this Annual Diversity and Inclusion report is to document the progress that NATO has made throughout 2018. Part I of this report highlights the achievements, Parts II, III and IV describe the composition of civilian or military staff in NATO by gender, grade, geographical distribution, and age. 2. In 2018, improvements to policies, leadership, talent acquisition, training, communication, monitoring/reporting, and developing new services all contributed to Diversity and Inclusion. 3. Policy Development and Implementation: The International Staff commissioned an independent, external assessment of NATO policies and practices to prevent harassment and discrimination. The review included benchmarking against other organisations1, as well as the use of best practices, observations and views provided by NATO stakeholders through interviews. 4. Talent Acquisition: A special focus has been given to improving the attractiveness of vacancy notices. Several NATO entities have used the augmented writing platform, Textio, to make job advertisements more gender and culturally neutral. In addition, NATO participated in the Global Careers Fair for Women in International Organizations recruitment event. Representatives from NATO entities interacted with candidates online engaging in dialogue for a half-day session, and providing information on vacancies and the application processes. 5. Training and Development: The fourth cycle of the NATO Mentoring Programme for women was launched. This programme was designed as a measure to increase the pool of qualified female candidates, and to identify and remove internal barriers which may deter or prevent women from advancing within the Organization that may be caused by structural barriers existing between different services and categories of staff.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EU and NATO | the ESSENTIAL PARTNERS European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)
    he essential partners dited by dited and Katharine A.M. Wright E Gustav Lindstrom and Thierry Tardy from With contributions Daniel Fiott, Christian Kaunert, Bruno Lété, Alexander Mattelaer, Hanna Smith, Simon J. Smith, Bart M.J. Szewczyk, Ori Wertman T THE EU NATO AND SEPTEMBER 2019 THE EU AND NATO | THE ESSENTIAL PARTNERS European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) 100, avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris http://www.iss.europa.eu Director: Gustav Lindstrom © EU Institute for Security Studies, 2019. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EUISS or of the European Union. print ISBN 978-92-9198-837-2 online ISBN 978-92-9198-836-5 CATALOGUE NUMBER QN-01-19-491-EN-C CATALOGUE NUMBER QN-01-19-491-EN-N DOI 10.2815/644113 DOI 10.2815/493939 Published by the EU Institute for Security Studies and printed in Belgium by Bietlot. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. Cover image credit: NATO THE EU AND NATO The essential partners Edited by Gustav Lindstrom and Thierry Tardy With contributions from Daniel Fiott, Christian Kaunert, Bruno Lété, Alexander Mattelaer, Hanna Smith, Simon J. Smith, Bart M.J. Szewczyk, Ori Wertman and Katharine A.M. Wright The editors Gustav Lindstrom is the Director of the EU Institute for Security Studies. Thierry Tardy is Director of the Research Division at the NATO Defense College (Rome). Contents Introduction 3 Gustav Lindstrom and Thierry Tardy 1 The scope of EU-NATO cooperation 5 Thierry Tardy and Gustav Lindstrom 2 Countering hybrid threats 13 Hanna Smith 3 Operational cooperation 21 Bart M.J.
    [Show full text]