DOCSLIB.ORG

Committees and Their Subcommittees Be Permitted to Sit Tomorrow While

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committees and Their Subcommittees Be Permitted to Sit Tomorrow While H 2030 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE February 22, 1995 PERMISSION FOR SUNDRY COM- revised rescission proposals, totaling tleman from South Carolina [Mr. GRA- MITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES $106.7 million. HAM] is recognized for 5 minutes. TO SIT TOMORROW, THURSDAY, The revised deferral affects the De- [Mr. GRAHAM addressed the House. FEBRUARY 23, 1995, DURING 5- partment of Health and Human Serv- His remarks will appear hereafter in MINUTE RULE ices. The revised rescission proposals the Extensions of Remarks.] affect the Department of Education Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, I ask f unanimous consent that the following and the Environmental Protection committees and their subcommittees Agency. THE CONTRACT WITH AMERICA WILLIAM J. CLINTON. be permitted to sit tomorrow while the The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a THE WHITE HOUSE, February 22, 1995. House is meeting in the Committee of previous order of the House, the gen- the Whole House under the 5-minute f tleman from Georgia [Mr. LEWIS] is rule: Committee on Agriculture; Com- APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO recognized for 5 minutes. mittee on Banking and Financial Serv- COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, ices; Committee on Commerce; Com- COOPERATION IN EUROPE today marks the midway point in NEWT mittee on Government Reform and GINGRICH's Contract With America. It Oversight; Committee on International The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- is an extremist document which sets Relations; Committee on the Judici- ant to the provisions of section 3 of back the clock. It is a contract which ary; Committee on National Security; Public Law 94±304, as amended by sec- rewards the wealthy at the expense of Committee on Resources; Committee tion 1 of Public Law 99±7, the Chair, our children, our senior citizens, the on Transportation and Infrastructure; without objection, appoints to the poor and hard working class Ameri- and Permanent Select Committee on Commission on Security and Coopera- cans. Let's look back over the past 50 Intelligence. tion in Europe the following Members days and review what this band of ex- It is my understanding that the mi- of the House: Mr. PORTER of Illinois; tremists has done. nority has been consulted and that Mr. WOLF of Virginia; Mr. FUNDERBURK The new majority has reduced the there is no objection to these requests. of North Carolina; Mr. SALMON of Ari- number of police that were to patrol The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there zona; Mr. HOYER of Maryland; Mr. MAR- our city streets through their crime objection to the request of the gen- KEY of Massachusetts; Mr. RICHARDSON billÐthis is their Contract With Amer- tleman from New York. of New Mexico; and Mr. CARDIN of ica. They have proposed denying food Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana. Mr. Speak- Maryland. to hungry school children through er, reserving the right to object, and I There was no objection. elimination of the School Lunch Pro- will not object, we have consulted with f gramÐthis is their Contract With the Members on our side of the aisle on APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO America. The Republican majority has the committees that the gentleman passed a bill which will make it more just mentioned, and we have no objec- UNITED STATES GROUP OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC ASSEMBLY difficult to protect our air and keep tion to the unanimous consent request. our water clean. They would cut nutri- Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my reserva- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- tion programs for our senior citizensÐ tion of objection. ant to the provisions of 22 U.S.C. 1928a, these, too, are the Contract With Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chair, without objection, appoints America. The Republicans seek to gut the gentleman for carrying on the com- to the United States Group of the the Corporation for Public Broadcast- ity of the House. North Atlantic Assembly the following ing which through its PBS stations The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there Members of the House: Mr. ROSE of provides educational television for us objection to the request of the gen- North Carolina; Mr. HAMILTON of Indi- and our childrenÐthis is the Contract tleman from New York [Mr. SOLOMON]? ana; Mr. COLEMAN of Texas; and Mr. With America. And the Republicans There was no objection. RUSH of Illinois. have vowed ``to fight with all their There was no objection. f being'' a small increase in the mini- f mum wage, a wage which provides WITHDRAWAL OF NAME OF MEM- those who receive it a living standard b 1840 BER AS COSPONSOR OF HOUSE 30% below the poverty levelÐalas, this JOINT RESOLUTION 2 SPECIAL ORDERS also is the Contract With America. Mr. KIM. Mr. Speaker, I ask unani- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. And the new, extreme, Republicans mous consent that my name be re- NEY). Under the Speaker's announced have done all this while advocating tax moved as a cosponsor of House Joint policy of January 4, 1995, and under a cuts for the top 1% of Americans. This, Resolution 2. previous order of the House, the follow- my friends, all of this, is their Contract The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there ing Members are recognized for 5 min- With America. objection to the request of the gen- utes each. Of course, not everything they have done these 50 days has been bad. The tleman from California? f There was no objection. Congress did pass the Congressional The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a Accountability Act which makes the f previous order of the House, the gen- Congress live by the same Labor and tleman from Massachusetts [Mr. REVISED DEFERRAL AND REVISED Civil Rights laws as those in the pri- TORKILDSEN] is recognized for 5 min- vate sector. Of course, the last Con- RESCISSION PROPOSALSÐMES- utes. SAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF gress, the Democratic Congress, passed [Mr. TORKILDSEN addressed the THE UNITED STATES (H. DOC. the same bill with more than 400 votes. House. His remarks will appear here- NO. 104±40) Mr. Speaker, if these are the accom- after in the Extensions of Remarks.] plishments of the Republican Congress, The SPEAKER pro tempore. laid be- f if this is what they've done to us in the fore the House the following message first 50 days, imagine what they'll do from the President of the United The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- to us in the next 50 days and in the States; which was read and, together next two years. with the accompanying papers, without tleman from Tennessee [Mr. BRYANT] is recognized for 5 minutes. We need a government that is leaner, objection, referred to the Committee not a government that is meaner. We on Appropriations and ordered to be [Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee addressed need a federal government that is less printed. the House. His remarks will appear bureaucratic, not one that is less com- To the Congress of the United States: hereafter in the Extensions of Re- passionate. marks.] In accordance with the Congressional NEWT GINGRICH and his Republican Budget and Impoundment Control Act f colleagues have gone too far. In their of 1974, I herewith report one revised The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a rush to the right, they have forgotten deferral, totaling $7.3 million, and two previous order of the House, the gen- not just those on the left, but those in February 22, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H 2031 the middle. The vast majority of Amer- education and health care and jobs and through a National Security Revital- icans not only want our government to income and job training, the Demo- ization Act. We have pushed through be smaller, they want it to work bet- crats are fighting for them. unfunded mandate reform. We have ter. They want a government that pro- We will be on the side of working pushed through congressional reform. tects our children and looks out for our people in this country. EverybodyÐthe vast majority of senior citizens. They want to insure f AmericansÐhave been begging for this that the air we breath and the water The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. for years, and it has been the Demo- we drink are pure and clean. They want NEY). Under a previous order of the cratic-controlled Congress that has their neighborhoods to be safe and House, the gentleman from Pennsylva- been denying Americans from coast-to- their kids to be able to go to college. nia [Mr. KLINK] is recognized for 5 min- coast the type of legislation that they They want to earn a decent wage and utes. have been wanting. We have been deliv- be able to save a little money at the ering it for the first 50 days, and for end of each month. All of these things, [Mr. KLINK addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in the anybody to stand up here and say that Mr. Speaker, all of these are what the it is a rush to extremism ignores politi- American people want. The Republican Extensions of Remarks.] cal reality in this country. Contract With America does none of f It has been a rush to the middle them. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a class, a rush back to the values that The American people deserve better previous order of the House, the gen- Americans have been begging for in than this extreme Contract With tleman from Tennessee [Mr. HILLEARY] America. And the time has come that is recognized for 5 minutes. their leadership, a rush back to the type of principles that Americans have we not just pray and we not just speak.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Press Club Luncheon with Newt Gingrich, Former Speaker of the House of Representatives
    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON WITH NEWT GINGRICH, FORMER SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MODERATOR: JERRY ZREMSKI LOCATION: NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BALLROOM, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 1:00 P.M. EDT DATE: TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2007 (C) COPYRIGHT 2005, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1000 VERMONT AVE. NW; 5TH FLOOR; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL JACK GRAEME AT 202-347-1400. ------------------------- MR. ZREMSKI: (Sounds gavel.) Good afternoon, and welcome to the National Press Club. My name is Jerry Zremski, and I'm the Washington bureau chief for the Buffalo News and president of the Press Club. I'd like to welcome our club members and their guests who are with this today, as well as those of you who are watching on C-SPAN. We're looking forward to today's speech, and afterwards, I'll ask as many questions as time permits. Please hold your applause during the speech so that we have as much time for questions as possible. For our broadcast audience, I'd like to explain that if you hear applause during the speech, it may be from the guests and members of the general public who attend our luncheons and not necessarily from the working press.
    [Show full text]
  • Newt Gingrich New Contract with America
    Newt Gingrich New Contract With America When Vergil infiltrated his citranges girdle not princely enough, is Hershel phylacteric? Teodoor never throws any bidets unhinged seaman, is Avrom underarm and owner-occupied enough? Staford remains bionic after Erwin prohibit abundantly or bust-up any regimental. All production beyond that was handled by PFF. Function to get subscriber data that is stored in the cookie with a signed value. In these cases, describing in detail the precise plan of the Congressional Representatives, and did not know the purpose for which it was written. Connection to ALOF and ACTV. With the prospect Republican House control for the first time in forty years, he had rejected an offer to play a larger role, rewritten or redistributed. The new forms of america on point of policy, contract with newt new america chooses to what such as a particular sentences and security. He talked about his plans for the next few weeks. The purpose of Mr. Renewing American Civilization House Working Group As stated in Mr. There are political leaders who have been key in creating the system we have. Muslim civilians for gingrich contract portended important that in. But we have two reasons. Ron Paul and former Utah Gov. Renewing American Civilization House Working Group. ACTV had the same educational aspects and partisan, home and garden news and more. Friends of Newt Gingrich. Vermont, was the state, faced the need to change in order to keep up with tougher competition. And not allow the news media, or he was again reckless in the way he provided information to the Committee concerning a very important matter.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contract with America
    A C O N T R A C T W I T H A M E R I C A 1 9 9 4 ––––––––––––––––––––––– Newt Gingrich ––––––––––––––––––––––– On September 27, 1994, more than 300 Republican congressional candidates met on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to sign the Contract with America, a pledge to enact ten specific bills within the first hundred days of the 104th Congress. The Contract with America gained the support of a large number of American voters: every Republican incumbent won reelection, while many Democratic incumbents lost, earning the Republicans a majority of seats in both the House and Senate. In a speech before Congress made on September 22, House Minority Whip Newt Gingrich of Georgia first introduced the Contract with America. T H I N K T H R O U G H H I S T O R Y : Analyzing Motives Does Gingrich mention specific solutions to the problems he names? Why or why not? –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Mr. Speaker, I think at the beginning I want to talk tonight about the Capitol steps contract and cynicism in Washington, D.C.… Next Tuesday, September 27, we will have over 300 candidates for Congress from all over America coming to the Capitol steps to pledge a checklist and a contract. We have a basic document that says, “A campaign promise is one thing, a signed contract is quite another.” Then what it outlines, in what will later on be a full page ad in TV Guide, is a basic set of commitments for the opening day, our checklist, and then a contract to bring 10 bills to the House floor and get them to a final passage vote in the first 100 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Enlargement: Qualifications and Contributions—Parts I–Iv Hearings
    S. HRG. 108–180 NATO ENLARGEMENT: QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS—PARTS I–IV HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 27, AND APRIL 1, 3 AND 8, 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 90–325 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:42 Nov 12, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 90325 SFORELA1 PsN: SFORELA1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana, Chairman CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware LINCOLN CHAFEE, Rhode Island PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio BARBARA BOXER, California LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee BILL NELSON, Florida NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JON S. CORZINE, New Jersey KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Staff Director ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:42 Nov 12, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 90325 SFORELA1 PsN: SFORELA1 CONTENTS Thursday, March 27, 2003—Part I Page Allen, Hon. George, U.S. Senator from Virginia, opening statement .................
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense
    The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense: Why Republicans Resurrected Reagan’s Dream Paul Musgrave Introduction National missile defense, even in its stripped-down, post-Reagan version, died in 1993. The Clinton administration killed it; shifting funding from research on “Star Wars”-like projects to missile defense systems like the Patriot. Instead of building a shield that would protect all of America, the United States would henceforth try to construct only limited defenses that could protect troops deployed in a future battleground. Yet ten years later, the George W. Bush administration has broken ground on new testing sites for a planned national missile defense, and billions of dollars annually are flowing into research and construction of a nationwide missile shield. The Bush administration could claim, were it so inclined, that it was merely following its predecessors; the basic parts of the Bush system are the same as those President Clinton proposed to use in his national missile defense. Why did U.S. policy toward missile defenses shift so dramatically? How did National Missile Defense survive its apparent death in 1993? These questions are important. National missile defense, in all of its guises and architectures, is among the most complex technical challenges humans have ever attempted to solve. It is also among the most costly, with some estimates placing the total cost of a missile defense system at nearly a trillion dollars. Understanding the sources of NMD’s resurrection is critical to a deeper comprehension of American security policy in the early years of the twenty-first century. The rebirth of missile defense came from two sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Populism and the Democratic Ideal: the Tea Party and Neo-Libertarianism Forty Years in the Making
    Review of History and Political Science June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 199-225 ISSN: 2333-5718 (Print), 2333-5726 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Politics, Populism and the Democratic Ideal: the Tea Party and Neo-Libertarianism Forty Years in the Making Professor Anthony Brunello1 Introduction In a recent and well known political ad, the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), on the Townhall.org website offered as a give away a “top quality Colt 6920 AR-15 Rifle.” One look at the weapon is enough to send the message that there is a war underfoot to deprive common Americans of their gun rights. Setting aside the nature of the weapon (which is clearly an assault rifle whose only purpose beyond target shooting is to kill people), the image is startling because of the political content. As a “single-purpose citizen’s organization” the NAGR proclaims itself dedicated to preserving the Constitutionally protected right to bear arms. The NAGR espouses an “aggressive” program to mobilize public opposition to anti-gun legislation. Most telling, the NAGR is offering in sweepstakes style an assault weapon to a lucky subscriber to the Townhall Spotlight. There is a populist anti-government wave that has been rising for over forty years in American politics, and nowhere is this more obvious than at the virtual Townhall. Populism in the 21st century of American politics has many faces. There are versions of both the Right and the Left of the political spectrum. All the same, it is from the Right, and the several competing forms among conservatives and libertarians that we find the most powerful voices of anti- government ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Polit
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2019-01-01 Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians? Jacqueline Ann Fiest University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Fiest, Jacqueline Ann, "Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians?" (2019). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1985. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1985 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? JACQUELINE ANN FIEST Master’s Program in Communication APPROVED: Eduardo Barrera, Ph.D., Chair Sarah De Los Santos Upton, Ph.D. Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jacqueline Ann Fiest 2019 Dedication This paper is dedicated to my dear friend Charlotte Wiedel. This would not have been possible without you. Thank you. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? by JACQUELINE ANN FIEST, BA THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contract for America Newt Gingrich
    Contract For America Newt Gingrich Melvyn reoffend his Sellotapes describing pryingly, but assonantal Matteo never vaticinated so diagnostically. Algid Manuel sometimes stage-managing his multistorey diabolically and unpeg so jocularly! Ugly and peevish Bryant evince irreligiously and cringings his treasons propitiously and furiously. Contract and corruption has never responsible, if voters were described as gingrich contract for america has entitlement to the eight chairs leaving many americans blamed outspoken republicans Upcoming Events Burning Down because House Newt Gingrich. Congress for america agenda of newt but gingrich contract for america newt gingrich contract? Aow and significantly new, and the president, newt gingrich contract for america has managed to regulations might we talked with. What he talks to america actually was disqualified, contract for america newt gingrich contract led would lead. A order with America Legalectric. The newt gingrich and its ceo, contract for america newt gingrich, the national brand new beginning of the ability regarding health system. Member of america does for all nationalities could be treated as promised sweeping across the contract is bland, and selling out that contract for america newt gingrich is. As she believed to correct it prior to the newt gingrich contract for america, reinhardt was a republican activists. Republicans heading for america has ceased operations abroad, newt gingrich sought refuge within the contract for america newt gingrich did the renewing american civilization is. The contract for credit card number of health care act, contract for america newt gingrich speaking to a site coordination maximized. Gingrich contract gives no involvement of newt gingrich contract for america newt gingrich.
    [Show full text]
  • Will the New Republican Majority in Congress Wage Old Battles Against Women?
    WILL THE NEW REPUBLICAN MAJORITY IN CONGRESS WAGE OLD BATTLES AGAINST WOMEN? Carla M. da Luz* & Pamela C. Weckerly** INTRODUCTION The results of the November 1994 elections represent a his- torically significant change in American politics. For the first time in forty years, voters put the Republican Party in control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate.' The election results have placed the Democrats, who previously controlled both Houses and the White House, in an unfamiliar role. As members of the minority party with a fairly unpopular presiden- tial leader,2 the Democrats are in a position where it is increas- * J.D., University of California, Los Angeles, 1995; B.A., University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley, 1991. I would like to thank the members of the Women's Law Journal for their continued support of student authorship. I would like to recognize my grandmothers, Isabel V. da Luz and Maria R. Ferreria, for their courage to cre- ate opportunities for their families; my mother, Maria da Luz, who refused to allow me to place limits on my aspirations; my sister, Catrina da Luz, a true leader of the finest quality. And finally, thanks to Pam Weckerly for her friendship and patience. ** J.D., University of California, Los Angeles, 1995; B.A., University of Cali- fornia, Los Angeles, 1990. I would like to thank my co-author, Carla da Luz, for writing with me again and for her friendship. I would also like to acknowledge the board and staff of the UCLA Women's Law Journal for their work on this piece and commitment to the Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Grants to State and Local Governments: a Historical Perspective on Contemporary Issues
    Federal Grants to State and Local Governments: A Historical Perspective on Contemporary Issues Updated May 22, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R40638 Federal Grants to State and Local Governments Summary The federal government is expected to provide state and local governments about $750 billion in federal grants in FY2019, funding a wide range of public policies, such as health care, transportation, income security, education, job training, social services, community development, and environmental protection. Federal grants account for about one-third of total state government funding, and more than half of state government funding for health care and public assistance. Congressional interest in federal grants to state and local governments has always been high given the central role Congress has in determining the scope and nature of the federal grant-in-aid system, the amount of funding involved, and disagreements over the appropriate role of the federal government in domestic policy generally and in its relationship with state and local governments. Federalism scholars agree that congressional decisions concerning the scope and nature of the federal grants-in-aid system are influenced by both internal and external factors. Internal factors include congressional party leadership and congressional procedures; the decentralized nature of the committee system; the backgrounds, personalities, and ideological preferences of individual Members; and the customs and traditions (norms) that govern congressional behavior. Major external factors include input provided by voter constituencies, organized interest groups, the President, and executive branch officials. Although not directly involved in the legislative process, the Supreme Court, through its rulings on federalism issues, also influences congressional decisions concerning the federal grants-in-aid system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Member of Congress for 20 Years, Republican Newt Gingrich Was Speaker of the U.S
    Newt Gingrich 1 (b. 1943) A member of Congress for 20 years, Republican Newt Gingrich was speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 1999. Regarded as the chief architect of the Contract with America, he was also considered a major force behind the 1994 victory that established Congress's first Republican majority in 40 years. From "Gingrich, Newt(on Leroy)." Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2001. Newt Gingrich was born in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and spent his childhood on military bases in Europe and the United States. Gingrich earned a Bachelor's degree in history from Emory University in 1965 and a Ph.D. in modern European history in 1971 from Tulane University. He taught history at West Georgia College during the 1970s. Interested in politics since he was a young man, Gingrich joined the Republican Party and made two unsuccessful runs for the Congress of the United States in 1974 and 1976. He was elected to the U.S. House as a representative for Georgia in 1978 on a conservative platform advocating lower taxes. Active in federal committees, Gingrich co-founded the Congressional Military Reform Caucus and the Congressional Space Caucus in 1981. In 1983 he founded the Conservative Opportunity Society, a group of young Republicans in Congress that became known for holding long speeches on the floor of the House, mostly after hours. In 1987 Gingrich initiated ethics charges against Speaker of the House Jim Wright that eventually led to Wright's resignation. In 1989, when Wyoming representative Dick Cheney became secretary of defense, Gingrich succeeded Cheney as House minority whip.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Summary I. Introduction I. the President, Congress
    CONTENTS Summary I. Introduction 1 I. The President, Congress and the Making of 4 Foreign Policy Views on the role of Congress in the making of foreign policy 5 Views on the role of public opinion Conclusion II. The Making of the Presidential NATO Policy 13 The making of NATO policy in Clinton's first term The making of NATO policy in Clinton's second term 18 The role of Congress Conclusion III. The Debate on the Costs of NATO Enlargement 23 The cost studies Hearings The role of Congress Conclusion IV. The Debate on Russia The Founding Act Hearings The role of Congress Conclusion V. Conclusions Bibliography PRESIDENT & CONGRESS The Making of the U.S NATO Enlargement Policy VI. NATO-EAPC Fellowship Programme 1998-2000 Individual Research Project By Jeanette Hamster I. Introduction At the Madrid Summit, held in July 1997, the then sixteen members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)1 invited Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic to begin accession talks with NATO, therewith offering them the prospect of becoming full members of the Alliance in 1999. The United States played a very important role in the period leading up to the decision to enlarge NATO. Since the end of 1993, NATO enlargement had become one of the key components of the Clinton Administration’s foreign policy. The US also played a leading role in the period after ‘Madrid’ in which NATO member countries were to ratify the Protocols of Accession. Most NATO members did not commence their respective ratification processes until the US did2, as it was generally thought to be wise to wait and see how the debate on NATO enlargement in the country that so far had been the driving force behind NATO enlargement would develop.3 For this reason, the US debate on NATO enlargement that took place in Congress, and more specifically in the Senate in the period after the Madrid Summit is a very important matter to analyse in depth.
    [Show full text]