Universi^ Micrcxilms International 300 N

INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality o f the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image o f the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. Universi^ Micrcxilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8311783 Norton, Michael Lee THE TYPE II "VISITATIO SEPULCHRI": A REPERTORIAL STUDY The Ohio State University PH,D. 1983 University Microfilms I nter n ati onalm n . zeeb R W . Ann Arbor. MI 48106 Copyright 1983 by Norton, Michael Lee All Rights Reserved PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed In the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V 1. Glossy photographs or pages. 2. Colored Illustrations, paper or print _____ 3. Photographs with dark background _____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy _____ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy. 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page. 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages y/ 8. Print exceeds margin requirements _____ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine ______ 10. Computer printout pages with Indistinct print y 11. Page(s) ___________ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) ___________ seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered ___________ . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages _____ 15. Other __________________________________________________________________ University Microfilms International THE TYPE II VISITATIO SEPULCHRI; A REPERTORIAL STUDY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Michael Lee Norton, B.M.Ed,, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 1983 Reading Committee: Approved By Prof. Keith E. Mixter Prof. Charles M. Atkinson Prof. Stanley J, Kahrl Adviser School of Music Dedicated to the memory of Henry Buford Norton, Sr. 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my adviser, Professor Keith Mixter, for his efforts in seeing that this project could be brought to fruition. His encouragement and constructive criticisms, to say nothing of his assistance in overcoming the vicissitudes of sorting through over three-hundred manuscript and printed liturgical books, enabled me to see much that I otherwise might not have seen and prevented me from traversing several unproductive, if not errant, paths of inquiry. I would like also to thank my readers. Professor Charles Atkinson and Professor Stanley Kahrl, who, through their comments and criticism s, proved to me that it was indeed possible to substitute clarity for obfuscation. The present study would not have been possible without the cooperation of the scores of American and European librarians and archivists, too numerous to mention here, who provided copies of the manuscript and printed sources of the Type II Visitatio Sepulchri housed within their respective collections. Especial thanks are due the staffs of the Department of Printed Books and the Department of Manuscripts of the British Library, London, England; Dr. Bruce Barker-Benfield of the Bodleian Library, Oxford, i i i England; Dr. Joseph Weier of the MlSnsterarchiv, Essen, Fede ral Republic of Germany; Dr. Erika Kunz of the Landes- bibliothek, Kassel, FRO; Dr. Rudolf Elvers and Ch. Dickmann, from the Musikabteilung and Handschriftenabteilung, respect ively, of the Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz, West Berlin; Dr. Wolfgang Milde of the Herzog August Biblio- thek, WolfenbUttel, FRG; Dr. Karl Dachs of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, München, FRG; Dr. Luigi De Biasio of the Biblioteca Arcivescovile, Udine, Italy; and the nuns of the Benedictine convent Nonnberg, in Salzburg, Austria, for the gracious hospitality and assistance afforded me during my several sojourns in Europe. Thanks are due also to Dr. Julian Plante of the Hill Monastic Manuscript Library in Collegeville , Minnesota for providing films of folia from many manuscripts held by Austrian libraries. I must also express my appreciation to Dr. Ritva Jonsson, Dr. Gunilla Iversen, and Gunilla Bjbrkvall of Stockholms Universitet for their help and encouragement during my visit to Stockholm in December of 1981 and for allowing me access to the library and microfilm collection of the Corpus Trooorum. I owe a great debt to my parents, Martha and Mervin Norton, whose encouragement and support, both moral and financial, enabled me to continue my study during the bleakest of days. I cannot thank them enough for having iv maintained their unqualified faith in a son who could be so foolish as to choose a career in the field of music. I especially wish to thank my father for sharing with me both his knowledge of computer applications and his computer. I would be remiss if I did not express my gratitude to my friends, John and Zoe Johnstone, who shared the dubious honor of being among the first to be subjected to the ideas presented in this study. I would like to thank John in particular for having prompted my v isit to Stockholm in December of 1981 and for his helpful comments concerning the fourth chapter of the present study. Finally, I wish to thank ray wife, Janis Norton, whose encouragement, support, and love helped me to bring this study to its end. VITA July 22, 1951 ............................Born - Heidelberg, FRG 1974 . ...................... B. M. Ed., Madison College, Harrisonburg, Virginia 1974-1975 ................................ University Fellowship, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1975-1976 ................................ Teaching Associate, School of 1981-1983 Music, The Ohio State University 1975-1978 ................................ Director of Music, Fifth Avenue United Methodist Church, Columbus, Ohio 1976 .............................................M. A., The Ohio State University 1976-1977 . Research Associate, Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, The Ohio State University 1977-1978 ..................................... Dissertation Year Fellowship, The Ohio State University 1978-1980 .............................. Director of Music, First Baptist Church, Columbus, Ohio 1978-1981 .............................. Operations Manager, J. Arthur Music, Columbus, Ohio Autumn 1980................................. Lecturer, School of Music, The Ohio State University 1981-1983 . ........................ Director of Music, Our Lady of Perpetual Help Catholic Church, Grove City, Ohio Vi FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Music History Medieval and Renaissance Music, Professor Richard Hoppin History of Musical Notation. Professor Richard Hoppin Baroque Music. Professor Martha Maas Classical Music. Professor Herbert Livingston Nineteenth-Century Music. Professor Alexander Main Twentieth-Century Music. Professor Richard Hoppin Music Bibliography and Historiography. Professor Keith Mixter History of Music Theory. Professor Norman Phelps Medieval Monasticism. Professor Joseph Lynch v ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION . ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i i i VITA . vi LIST OF TABLES . X LIST OF FIGURES xi ABBREVIATIONS xii INTRODUCTION . 1 Chapter I. DEFINITIONS AND METHODS The Repertory ................................ 6 Methodology .................. ....... 21 Regional Forms ................................ 22 Origin and Dissemination . 32 Liturgical Context and Function 35 II. REGIONAL FORMS 48 Textual and Musical Variants . 49 The Type II Core ....................... 49 Accompanying Texts ................... 70 Concluding Texts . Introductory Texts . Core Embellishment . 83 Core Substitutes . 87 The Magdalene Amplification . 96 The Magdalene Core . 96 Introductory Texts . 101 Concluding Texts . 104 The Marian Procession . 106 Variant Patterns

Load more