Pest Status of the Coconut Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi Brow N (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Avocados in South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pest Status of the Coconut Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi Brow N (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Avocados in South Africa Pest Status of the Coconut Bug Pseudotheraptus wayi Brow n (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Avocados in South Africa * a • • O O O O O O O O O O O T. VAN DER MEULE N O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Institute for Tropical Pest Status of the Coconut La situation du ravageur La situación de and Subtropical Crops Bug Pseudotheraptus wayi Pseudotheraptus wayi Pseudotheraptus way i Private Bag X11208 Brown (Hemiptera : Brown (Hemiptera : Brown : Nelspruit 1200 (Hemiptera South Afric a Coreidae) on Avocados Coreidae), la punaise Coreidae), el chinche in South Africa . du cocotier, sur les avocats del cocotero, sobre la A .S . SCHOEMAN en Afrique du Sud . producción del aguacate Department of Entomology en Africa del Sur . University of Pretori a Pretoria 0002 ABSTRACT RÉSUM É RESUMEN South Afric a Avocado (cv . Fuerte) crop loss La baisse de production de La caída de la producció n caused by the coconut bu g lavocat provoquée par en el aguacate provocada (Pseudotheraptus wayi) wa s Pseudotheraptus wayi, un por Pseudotheraptus wayi, studied over a 2-year period in ravageur du cocotier, a fait la chinche del cocotero, fu e 3 areas . Three orchards (1 0 lobjet dune étude pendant objeto de un estudio durant e Part of a M .Sc . thesi s trees / orchard) were monitored deux ans dans trois régions dos años en tres regione s by the senior author to b e weekly to assess fruit drop and dAfrique du Sud. Trois vergers , de Africa del Sur . submitted to the University harvest loss . None of these avec un échantillon de Tres huertos con una muestra of Pretoria, Pretoria 000 2 orchards had been spraye d 10 arbres par verger, ont ét é de 10 árboles cada uno, fueron South Africa with insecticides. Damage surveillés une fois par semain e observados una vez por ranged from 1 .7% on aborte d pour permettre lévaluation semana, lo cual permitió fruit to 76 .2% on ripe fruit, wit h de la chute des fruits et de la evaluar la caída de fruto s means of 6 .6% damage on perte de récolte . Ces vergers y la pérdida de la cosecha . aborted fruit and 15 .9% on nont subi aucun traitement Estos huertos no tuviero n harvested fruit . insecticide . Les dégâts varient ningún tratamiento insecticida . de 1,7 % sur les fruits avortés Los daños variaron de 1,7 % à 76,2 % sur les fruits mûrs , en los frutos abortados a 76,2 % les moyennes atteignant 6,6 % en los frutos maduros . pour les fruits avortés et 15,9 % Los promedios fueron 6,6 % pour les fruits récoltés . para los frutos abortados y 15,9 % para los frutos cosechados . Fruits, vol . 49, n°1, p .71-75 asaaaaaaaaaaasa asaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaasaaaasa a KEYWORDS MOTS CLÉ S PALABRAS CLAVE Persea americana, Persea americana, avocat, Persea americana , avocados, South Africa, Afrique du Sud, ravageurs aguacate, Sudafrica , pests of plants, damage , des plantes, dégât, plagas de plantas, daños , experiments . expérimentation . experimentos . Fruits, vol . 49, n°1 a 71 from the fruit with their piercing-suckin g . introductio n mouth parts (VAN DER MEULEN, 1992) . To our knowledge, there are no other The coconut bug, Pseudotheraptus wayi reports of P . wayi-incluced damage to Brown (Hemiptera : Coreidae), a coconu t avocado in other parts of the world, but pest in East Africa (MARIAU, 1969), was according to WAITE (1990) a biologically first reported in 1977 in South Africa o n and visually similar species, Amblypelta mangoes and guavas (DE VILLIERS and spp., causes quite severe fruit drop i n WOLMARANS, 1980) . It is now known t o Australia. attack macadamia (DE VILLIERS, 1986) , avocado (DE VILLIERS and VAN DEN BERG , Producers often confuse damage cause d 1984) and mango (VAN DER MEULEN, 1990) . by the coconut bug (Photo 1) with hai l VAN DER MEULEN (1992) reporte d damage, and sometimes even with frui t observing up to 52 .4% damage in an fly damage . However, hail damage is untreated guava orchard . normally only superficial, whereas th e coconut bug produces a hard interna l According to LEVER (1969), the biology of knob just underneath the surface . This the coconut bug (Figure 1) on coconut s knob can be up to 10 mm in diamete r is as follows: on average the female lays when damage is inflicted at a youn g 74 eggs during its life cycle . First-insta r nymphs have not been observed feedin g stage and normally comes off when th e peel is removed . The fruit can also be on coconut palms, but they can caus e severe tissue damage once they are about malformed (Photo 2) when infestation by half-grown . Adults of both sexes fl y adult coconut bugs occurs at an earl y readily when disturbed . Each individual is stage of fruit development, but interna l fruit rot is seldom observed responsible for approximately 200 punc- . Coconut bu g tures during the course of its life . The damage may be distinguished from tha t insect always lives in the crown of th e caused by fruit flies, which form star-lik e palm and nymphs are only found on o r lesions (Photo 2) on the outside of the near the spadix . They are rarely observed peel. In South Africa, there are n o during the day to avoid direct sunshin e available insecticides to control coconut and heavy rain . They feed in the lat e bugs on avocados (VERMEULEN et al., afternoon and early morning, and ar e 1992) . most active on cloudy but not heavil y The aim of the present study wa s overcast days. Population densities vary twofold : to determine whether th e markedly between trees, but are alway s coconut bug causes fruit drop, and to low, with a per-tree average of onl y assess the economic impact of the about one specimen . coconut bug as an avocado pest in Damage to avocado is caused by bot h Eastern Transvaal (South Africa) . adults and nymphs as they extract sa p . material s and methods Three avocado (cv . Fuerte) orchards in three different areas, were assessed in th e study. The sites were: Westfalia (23 .05 S , 30 .07 E), Burgershall (25 .05 S, 31 .05 E) and Excelsior (25 .02 S, 31 .18 E). The trees were between 10 and 15 years old. Ten trees were chosen at random at each sit e and monitored during the study . Figure 1 Firstly, adult coconut bugs were put i n The adult coconut bug gauze cages along with bunches of Pseudotheraptus wayi. young avocado fruit (10-20 mm in length) 72 • Fruits, vol . 49, n° 1 • e e to determine whether they could induc e fruit drop, and to observe how th e lesions develop into damage marks . Two coconut bugs were placed in each cag e with ± 5 fruits, with 5 replicates hung only in the orchard at Excelsior . After feeding, the bugs were removed and th e lesions assessed . Secondly, a trial was conducted to determine what percentage of aborted fruit dropped as a result of coconut bu g damage per se, and what percentage of damage to non-aborted fruit was inflicte d by the coconut bug . This trial was conducted over a 2-year period (1989- 1991). To facilitate collection of aborted fruit, and to standardize sample sizes , pieces of shadow cloth (2 m x 1 m) were stretched between wooden poles 1 m avocados damaged by coconut hugs ar e Photo 1 above ground under the trees, and all given in Table 1 . Percentages of damag e Typical coconut bug damage , fruit that dropped on these traps durin g due to coconut bug are given as a mean often referred to as pencil the first 2 months after fruit set were per orchard per season . damage . collected on a weekly basis. The fruit were then assessed for coconut bu g On harvested fruit, the mean damage du e damage, except for fruit which droppe d to coconut bugs ranged from 1 .7% a t directly after fruit set when they were to o Burgershall in the 1989/90 season to small (5 mm diameter and smaller) . A 76.2% at Excelsior in the same season . sample of 50 ripe fruits per tree were Losses of up to 98% on individual tree s harvested at random at the end of each were recorded on the latter farm . On season . These fruit were examined t o aborted fruit, damage ranged from 3 .8% determine the effects of coconut bug to 9.4% over the 2-year period . With the infestation . exception of Excelsior, the mean damag e for all orchards was 5 .3%, which is close to the generally accepted threshol d Photo 2 Malformed fruit (far right) level of 5% (EDWARDS and HEATH, 1964) . due to coconut bug damage. •••• results However, the damage levels obtained a t The two fruits on the left were Excelsior are not uncommon and, and discussion punctured by fruit flies . Most of the coconut bugs placed in gauze cages began attacking the young avocad o fruit almost immediately . Within a fe w hours, watermark lesions, visible as slightly darker patches than the rest of the peel, appeared on the surface of the fruit. Within 2 days, these marks had become indented dark patches of about 10 mm diameter. Within 7 days, 80% of these fruits had dropped and all wer e aborted after 14 days .
Recommended publications
  • New Records of Some Pests of the Coconut Inflorescence and Developing Fruit and Their Natural Enemies in Sri Lanka
    COCOS, (1987) 5, 39—42 Printed in Sri Lanka New Records of some Pests of the Coconut Inflorescence and Developing Fruit and Their Natural Enemies in Sri Lanka L. C. P. FERNANDO and P. KANAGARATNAM Coconut Research Institute, Lunuwila, Sri Lanka. ABSTRACT A survey was carried out at Bandirippuwa Estate, Kirimetiyana Estate and at Isolated Seed Garden, Rajakadaluwa for the pests of coconut inflorescence and developing fruits. The mite, Dolichotetranychus sp. (Tenuipalpidae) which lives beneath the perianth and feeds on the epicarp, causes considerable damage to the developing fruit. Bi-monthly observations on the intensity of infestation of nuts among different forms of coconut indicated a significant difference among forms in their susceptibility to mite damage. Pseudococcus cocotis (Maskell) (Pseudococcidae), Pseudococcus citriculus Green (Pseudococcidae) and Planococcus lilacinus (Cockereli) (Pseudococcidae), when feeding in large numbers on the peduncle, cause button nut shedding and drying up of the inflo­ rescence. The parasitoids and predators of these mealybugs recorded for the first time in Sri Lanka are Promuscidea unfasciativentris Girault (Aphelinidae) Platygaster sp. (Platygastridae), Anagyrus sp. nr. pseudococci (Girault) (Encyrtidae) Coccodiplosis sp. (Cecidomyiidae), Cryptogonus bryanti Kapur (Coccinellidae) and Pseudoscymnus sp. (Coccinellidae). Several species of scale insects namely, Coccus hesperidum (Linnaeus) (Coccidae) Aulacaspis sp. (Diaspididae), Pseudaulacaspis cockerelli (Cooley) (Diaspididae), Aoni- diella orientalis (Newstead) (Diaspididae), and Pinnaspis strachani (Cooley) (Diaspididae) are recorded as minor pests of the developing fruits of coconut. Coccophagus silvestrii Compere (Aphelinidae), Scymnus sp. (Coccinellidae), Pseudoscymnus sp. (Coccinellidae) Telsimia ceylonica (Weise) (Coccinellidae), Cryptogonus bryanti Kapur (Coccinellidae) and Cybocephalus sp. (Nitidulidae) are recorded as their parasitoids and predators. These natural enemies are probably responsible for the control of these pests in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Damage Caused by the Coconut Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi (Brown) (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Guavas
    Fruits - vol . 47, n°2, 1992 31 7 Assessment of damage caused by the coconut bug Pseudotheraptus wayi (Brown) (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on guavas. T. VAN DER MEULEN * ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE COCONUT BUG EVALUATION DES DEGATS CAUSES PAR LE PARASITE DE S PSEUDOTHERAPTUS WAY! (BROWN) (HEMIPTERA : COCOTIERS , PSEUDOTHERAPTUS WAY! (BROWN) COREIDAE) ON GUAVAS . (HEMIPTERA : COREIDAE) SUR GOYAVES. T . VAN DER MEULEN . T. VAN DER MEULEN . Fruits, Mar .-Apr . 1992, vol . 47, n° 2, p .317-320 . Fruits, Mar : Apr . 1992, vol . 47, n° 2, p .317-320 . ABSTRACT - Damage caused by the coconut bug, Pseudotheraptu s RESUME - Sur goyaves, les dégâts causés par Pseudotheraptus wayi , wayi on guavas was studied in the Nelspruit Area . Three orchards, an d parasite du cocotier, ont été étudiés dans la région de Nelspruit . Dans 10 trees per orchard, were monitored weekly, from fruit drop unti l trois vergers, dix arbres par verger ont été observés chaque semaine , harvest . None of these orchards were sprayed with insecticides . de la nouaison à la récolte . Aucun de ces vergers na subi de traite- Average of 30 per cent of the aborted fruits and 26 per cent of th e ments insecticides . En moyenne, 30 p . 100 des fruits avortés et 26 p . ripe fruits were damaged . 100 des fruits parvenus à maturité ont été endommagés . INTRODUCTIO N readily when disturbed . Each individual makes about 200 punctures in the course of its existence . The insect lives i n The coconut bug, Pseudotheraptus wayi (Brown) (He- the crown of the palm throughout its life and the nymphs miptera : Coreidae) indigenous to East-Africa on coconut s are found only on or near the spadix .
    [Show full text]
  • Ants: Major Functional Elements in Fruit Agro-Ecosystems and Biological Control Agents
    sustainability Review Ants: Major Functional Elements in Fruit Agro-Ecosystems and Biological Control Agents Lamine Diamé 1,2,*, Jean-Yves Rey 1,3,6, Jean-François Vayssières 3,6, Isabelle Grechi 4,6, Anaïs Chailleux 3,5,6 ID and Karamoko Diarra 2 1 Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Centre pour le Développement de l’Horticulture, BP 3120 Dakar, Senegal; [email protected] 2 Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, BP 7925 Dakar, Senegal; [email protected] 3 Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UPR HortSys, F-34398 Montpellier, France; jean-franç[email protected] (J.F.V.); [email protected] (A.C.) 4 Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UPR HortSys, F-97455 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France; [email protected] 5 Biopass, Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles—University Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar—Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, BP 2274 Dakar, Senegal 6 University de Montpellier, Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, HortSys, F-34398 Montpellier, France * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 October 2017; Accepted: 12 December 2017; Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract: Ants are a very diverse taxonomic group. They display remarkable social organization that has enabled them to be ubiquitous throughout the world. They make up approximately 10% of the world’s animal biomass. Ants provide ecosystem services in agrosystems by playing a major role in plant pollination, soil bioturbation, bioindication, and the regulation of crop-damaging insects. Over recent decades, there have been numerous studies in ant ecology and the focus on tree cropping systems has given added importance to ant ecology knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Oecophylla Longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for Management of Helopeltis Spp
    Potential of Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for management of Helopeltis spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) and Pseudotheraptus wayi (Hemiptera: Coreidae) in cashew in Tanzania MI Olotu 22789332 Thesis submitted for thedegree Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences at the Potchefstroom Campusof the North-West University Promoter: Prof MJ du Plessis Co-Promoter: Dr JNK Maniania Assistant-Promoter: Dr ZS Seguni September 2013 ii APPROVAL BY SUPERVISORS This thesis has been submitted with our approval. Prof. Magdalena Johanna du Plessis School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus), Private Bag, X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa. September 2013 ________________ Date Signature Dr. Nguya Kalemba Maniania International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-0-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. September 2013 ________________ Date Signature Dr. Zuberi Singano Seguni Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute (MARI),P.O. Box 6226, Dar-es- Salaam, Tanzania. September 2013 Date Signature iii DECLARATION I, Moses Iwatasia Olotu, declare that this thesis which I submit to the North- West University, Potchefstroom Campus, in compliance with the requirements set for the PhD in Environmental Science degree is my own original work and has not already been submitted to any other University for a similar or any other degree award. September 2013 Date Signature iv DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my mother Siael Olotu, spouse Estheria Olotu, children Irine and Ian and the entire family for constant love and support. To my late father Iwatasia Olotu v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my sincere thanks to all individuals, without whom this study would not have been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Biology and Semiochemical Mediated Behaviour of the Coreid Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi Brown 1955, a Major Pest of Cashew in East Africa
    MORPHOLOGY, BIOLOGY AND SEMIOCHEMICAL MEDIATED BEHAVIOUR OF THE COREID BUG PSEUDOTHERAPTUS WAYI BROWN 1955, A MAJOR PEST OF CASHEW IN EAST AFRICA BY EGONYU JAMES PETER BSc. AGRICULTURE AND MSc. CROP SCIENCE-MAKERERE UNIVERSITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI IN FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENTOMOLOGY APRIL 2013 DECLARATION AND APPROVAL Declaration by the candidate I, Egonyu James Peter (Registration Number: I80/80504/2010), hereby declare that this Thesis is entirely mine, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it has not been submitted for a degree in any other University. Signature: __________________________________ Date: ______________ Approval by supervisors We, the undersigned, hereby assert that the candidate conducted this study under our supervision. 1. Dr. Jacques Kabaru1 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 2. Prof. Lucy Irungu1 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 3. Dr. Sunday Ekesi2 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 4. Prof. Baldwyn Torto2 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. 2International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772- 00100, Nairobi, Kenya. i DEDICATION To my dear wife Rose and our children. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am so grateful to Drs. Jacques Kabaru and Sunday Ekesi, and Profs. Lucy Irungu and Baldwyn Torto for their invaluable guidance. I further thank Dr. Fabian Haas for guidance on morphometric studies and assistance with photography. In addition, I am grateful to colleagues at the Behavioural and Chemical Ecology Department, namely Drs. Fikira Kimbogota, Serge Kuate, Lucy Kananu, Sabina Wachira, Ayuka Fombong and Donald Kachigamba, Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera Coreidae (Anoplocnemis Curvipes, Homoeocerus Pallens, Leptoglossus Membranaceus Et Pseudotheraptus Devastans) : Four Crop Pest and Their Wild Host Plants
    American Research Journal of Agriculture Original Article ISSN 2378-9018 Volume 1, Issue 4, 2015 Heteroptera Coreidae (Anoplocnemis curvipes, Homoeocerus pallens, Leptoglossus membranaceus et Pseudotheraptus devastans) : Four crop pest and their wild host plants YEBOUE N’Guessan Lucie1*, SORO Senan12, TRA BI Crolaud Sylvain1 1Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé, UFR Agroforesterie et UFR Environnement, BP 150 Daloa, Côte d’Ivoire 2Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire Abstract: Heteroptera Coreidae are all phytophagous insects. They are both meet on cultivated and wild plants. The objective of this study was to identify the Coreinae on the different crops grown in Côte d’Ivoire, evaluate the damage on these plants and identify wild plants that serve as their refuge in the absence of crops. The samplings were carried out in areas cultivated across different regions and in the reserve of Lamto. The insects were captured using a sweep net, a harvesting cage and threshing technics. The catching were once a week in different areas during one year. The results indicate that among Coreinae harvested, Anoplocnemis curvipes, Homoeocerus pallens, Leptoglossus membranaceus and Pseudotheraptus devastans were the mostly encountered on the prospected plants. The polyphagous species was A. curvipes with over than 60 host plants identified. Gossypium barbadense was the most infected by the Coreinae, followed by Cocos nucifera and Vigna unguiculata. The damage caused by these insects on the plants and the yields are function of their number in the field. Keywords: Heteroptera, Coreinae, pests, Côte d’Ivoire I. INTRODUCTION Heteroptera family contain a great number of tropical species (Chaudonneret 1990). They are divided into more than 70 families (Capsidae Miridae, Coreidae, Lygeidae, Pentatomidae, Pyrrochoridae, Tingidae, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Myanmar PERSUAP
    BUREAUS FOR ASIA AND FOOD SECURITY PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) IEE AMENDMENT: §216.3(B) PESTICIDE PROCEDURES PROJECT/ACTIVITY DATA Project/Activity Name: Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II (“Harvest II”) Amendment #: 1 Geographic Location: South East Asia (Cambodia) Implementation Start/End: 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2021 Implementing Partner(s): Abt Associates, International Development Enterprises (iDE), Emerging Markets Consulting (EMC) Tracking ID/link: Tracking ID/link of Related IEE: Asia 16-042 https://ecd.usaid.gov/repository/pdf/46486.pdf Tracking ID/link of Other Related Analyses: ORGANIZATIONAL/ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Implementing Operating Unit: Cambodia Funding Operating Unit: Bureau for Asia Initial Funding Account(s): $17.5 M Total Funding Amount: Amendment Funding Date / Amount: April 2017-April 2022 Other Affected Units: Bureau for Food Security Lead BEO Bureau: Asia Prepared by: Alan Schroeder, PhD, MBA; Kim Hian Seng, PhD, with support from Abt Associates and iDE Date Prepared: 8/2/2018 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW DATA Analysis Type: §216.3(B) Pesticide Procedures - PERSUAP Environmental Determination: Negative Determination with Conditions PERSUAP Procedures Expiration Date: 12/31/2021 Climate Risks Considerations / Conditions 2018 Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II PERSUAP 1 ACRONYMS AI Active Ingredient A/COR Agreement/Contracting Officer’s Representative ASIA Bureau for Asia BEO Bureau Environmental Officer BMP Best Management Practice BRC British Retail Consortium BT Bacillus thuringiensis
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Biology and Semiochemical Mediated Behaviour of the Coreid Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi Brown 1955, a Major Pest of Cashew in East Africa
    MORPHOLOGY, BIOLOGY AND SEMIOCHEMICAL MEDIATED BEHAVIOUR OF THE COREID BUG PSEUDOTHERAPTUS WAYI BROWN 1955, A MAJOR PEST OF CASHEW IN EAST AFRICA BY EGONYU JAMES PETER BSc. AGRICULTURE AND MSc. CROP SCIENCE-MAKERERE UNIVERSITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI IN FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENTOMOLOGY APRIL 2013 DECLARATION AND APPROVAL Declaration by the candidate I, Egonyu James Peter (Registration Number: I80/80504/2010), hereby declare that this Thesis is entirely mine, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it has not been submitted for a degree in any other University. Signature: __________________________________ Date: ______________ Approval by supervisors We, the undersigned, hereby assert that the candidate conducted this study under our supervision. 1. Dr. Jacques Kabaru1 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 2. Prof. Lucy Irungu1 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 3. Dr. Sunday Ekesi2 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 4. Prof. Baldwyn Torto2 Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________ 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. 2International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772- 00100, Nairobi, Kenya. i DEDICATION To my dear wife Rose and our children. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am so grateful to Drs. Jacques Kabaru and Sunday Ekesi, and Profs. Lucy Irungu and Baldwyn Torto for their invaluable guidance. I further thank Dr. Fabian Haas for guidance on morphometric studies and assistance with photography. In addition, I am grateful to colleagues at the Behavioural and Chemical Ecology Department, namely Drs. Fikira Kimbogota, Serge Kuate, Lucy Kananu, Sabina Wachira, Ayuka Fombong and Donald Kachigamba, Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. African Farmers Have Amazing Allies in Their Cashew Plantations
    15. African farmers have amazing allies in their cashew plantations Jean-François Vayssières(1, 2)*, Florence Anato(3), Antonio Sinzogan(3), Appolinaire Adandonon(4), Rosine Wargui(3), Hermance Houngbo(3), Issa Ouagoussounon(3), Anaïs Chailleux(5), Pascal Danthu(2), Georg Goergen(6), Achille Adopo(7), Manuele Tamo(6), Joachim Offenberg(8) (1) Campus agronomique de Kourou, CIRAD, Kourou-Pariacabo, 97310, France (2) MUSE, Université de Montpellier - CIRAD, UPR HortSys, 34398 - Montpellier, France (3) UAC, Université d’Abomey Calavi, FSA, 03BP 2819, Cotonou, Bénin (4) ENSTA - Kétou, Université d’Agriculture de Kétou, BP 43, Kétou, Bénin (5) MUSE - CIRAD, UPR HortSys, Biopass, ISRA-IRD, BP 1386, Dakar, Sénégal (6) IITA, Biological Control Unit for Africa, 08 BP 0932, Cotonou, Bénin (7) CNRA, 01 BP 1740 Abidjan 01, Côte d’Ivoire (8) Université d’Aarhus, Vejlsoevej 25, 8600 Silkeborg, Danemark *E-mail corresponding author: [email protected] Description. In West Africa, fruit trees are a crucial but often neglected component of people’s lives and more than 50% of fruit crops are thought to be lost to insect pests every year. The relatively low adoption rate of old-IPM practices underpins the need to take up challenges and propose new pioneering control methods, such as using weaver ants in cashew plantations. Literature. The genus Oecophylla is represented by two tropical species, Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) and Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius), occurring in sub-Saharan Africa and Australasia, respectively. In southern China, but also in Vietnam, weaver ant husbandry is a centuries-old tradition. Positive ant-managing experiences from Asia have generated some recent interest in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Avocado Insects of South Africa
    South African Avocado Growers’ Association Yearbook 1987. 10:75-79 Proceedings of the First World Avocado Congress Avocado insects of South Africa EA DE VILLIERS and MA VAN DEN BERG Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Research Institute, Private Bag X11208, Nelspruit 1200, RSA SYNOPSIS In South Africa, the avocado is relatively free of serious pests. This can be attributed to the balance that exists between potential pests and their natural enemies and also to grower awareness of this natural biological control. Minor insect pests are discussed which have the potential of becoming economic pests if their natural enemies are destroyed. Chemical control of avocado pests is not a standard practice. Insecticides used on avocado thus far are limited to those used in bait sprays for the control of fruit fly. INTRODUCTION In South Africa avocado orchards are relatively free of serious insect pests. This can be attributed to the presence of natural enemies capable of controlling these insects and because the avocado producers realise the value of biological control. The use of insecticides has thus far been limited to those used in bait sprays against fruit fly on a few farms only and, so far, there have been no pest repercussions as a result of this (De Villiers, in press). A warning against the use of insecticides on avocados was given by Schwartz (1978). So far 18 potential insect pests have been found in South Africa on avocados, namely: 2 Thysanoptera; 4 Lepidoptera; 1 Hemiptera; 2 Coccidae; 6 Diaspididae; 2 Pseudococcidae; and 1 Diptera (De Villiers, in press). The more troublesome pests are those which cause markings on the surface of the fruit pericarp, such as the fruit fly, the false codling moth (Schwartz, 1978) and the coconut bug (Viljoen, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • PESTS of the COCONUT PALM Mi Pests and Diseases Are Particularly Important Among the Factors Which Limit Agricultural Production and Destroy Stored Products
    PESTS of the COCONUT PALM mi Pests and diseases are particularly important among the factors which limit agricultural production and destroy stored products. This publication concerns the pests of the coconut palm and is intended for the use of research workers, personnel of plant protection services and growers Descriptions are given for each pest (adult or early stages), with information on the economic importance of the species the type of damage caused, and the control measures which have been applied (with or without success) up to the present time. The text deals with 110 species of insects which attack the palm in the field; in addition there arc those that attack copra in storage, as well as the various pests that are not insects This is the first of a series of publications on the pests and diseases of economically importani plants and plant products, and is intended primarily to fill a gap in currently available entomological and phytopathological literature and so to assist developing countries. PESTS OF THE COCONUT PALM Copyrighted material FAO Plant Production and Protection Series No. 18 PESTS OF THE COCONUT PALM b R.J.A.W. Lever FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome 1969 Thl 6 One 0A8R-598-HSG9 First printing 1969 Second printing 1979 P-14 ISBN 92-5-100857-4 © FAO 1969 Printed in Italy Copyrighted material FOREWORD Shortage of food is still one of the most pressing problems in many countries. Among the factors which limit agricultural production and destroy stored products, pests and diseases are particularly important.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Control of the Coconut Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Avocado in South Africa
    Integrated control of the coconut bug Pseudotheraptus wayi (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on avocado in South Africa Schalk Schoeman, Tertia Grove, Marinda de Beer, Ben Botha and Rachel Mohlala Agricultural Research Council – Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Crops Private Bag X11208, Nelspruit 1200, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION the coconut bug was determined in two orchards with During 1991 the loss of avocado fruit due to the co- a history of severe damage. The trial site at Nelspruit conut bug in South Africa already amounted approxi- (25°26’55.73”S 30°58’09.77”E) was surrounded by mately R1.37 million (Erichsen & Schoeman, 1992). commercial host plants while the orchard in Tzaneen The coconut bug was recorded during 1977 for the fi rst (23°49’18.55”S 30°10’31.04”E) was bordered by riv- time in South Africa (De Villiers & Wolmarans, 1980) erine vegetation and avocado orchards. Both orchards and was subsequently recorded on avocados approxi- were surveyed every fortnight and fi fty fruit from fi ve mately six years later by De Villiers and Van den Berg randomly selected trees were examined in situ for stink (1984). According to Van der Meulen (1992), mean bug feeding damage. damage percentages on early aborted avocados varied from 4.2-9.1% while it varied from 2.1-39.9% on ma- Area wide management of the coconut bug ture fruit at harvest. On some farms damage levels as Six randomly selected avocado, litchi and macada- high as 76.2% were recorded. mia trees were sprayed every month with Dichlorvos According to Dennill and Erasmus (1991), the co- 1000 g/L EC at the Burgershall experimental station of conut bug was the biggest insect problem on avocados the Agricultural Research Council – Insitute for Tropi- during the early 1990’s and they recorded ±4.7% in- cal and Subtropical Crops (ARC-ITSC) (25°07’01.94”S festation in the packhouse.
    [Show full text]