Weaver Ant Oecophylla Longinoda Latreille

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weaver Ant Oecophylla Longinoda Latreille WEAVER ANT OECOPHYLLA LONGINODA LATREILLE (HYMENOPTERA FORMICIDAE) AS BIOCONTROL AGENT ON MAJOR INSECT PESTS OF CASHEW AND MANGO IN TANZANIA NASSOR RASHID ABDULLA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE. MOROGORO, TANZANIA. 2016 ii EXTENDED ABSTRACT Experiments to determine the potential of Weaver ants, Oecophylla longinoda Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as biocontrol agents of major insect pests of cashew and mango were conducted at Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute in Mtwara and Kibaha in the Coast region, during 2012/13 and 2013/14 fruiting seasons. Cashew is attacked by Coconut bugs, Pseudotheraptus wayi Brown; Mirid bugs, Helopeltis spp. and Thrips, Selenothrips rubrocinctus Giard. Mango is threatened by several fruit fly species and the mango seed weevils, Sternochetus mangiferae (Fabricius); both being quarantine pests. Farmers use synthetic insecticides to control these pests and no alternative measures are available for organic growers. Reliance on chemical control measures has not made it possible to suppress the pests‟ populations to uneconomic levels. Similarly, dependency on insecticides for the control of S. mangiferae during flowering season has not proven very successful. In the current study, the efficiency of O. longinoda as bio-control agents was compared with Karate® (lambda-cyhalothrin) and the control plots against Cashew insect pests. On mango, the efficacy of O. longinoda was compared with Dudumida (70WDG Imidacloprid) and the control against fruit flies and the S. mangiferae. The results indicated significantly lower (P<0.0001) damages for the three cashew pests in the protected trees compared to control. For two seasons, P. wayi damage was <5% in protected trees as opposed to 29% and 25% in the unprotected plots; Helopeltis spp damage was <3% in protected trees for two seasons as opposed to >8% and >6% in unprotected, and S. rubrocinctus damage was <11% in iii protected trees for both seasons as opposed to >41% and >39% in the unprotected plots in 2012/13 and 2013/14 respectively. Incidences of fruit flies was <6% and <8% in protected trees as opposed to >18% and >24% in the unprotected in 2012/13 and 2013/14 respectively, whereas incidences of S. mangiferae was <7% and <8% in protected trees as opposed to >24% and >30% in unprotected trees in 2012/13 and 2013/14 respectively. Throughout the experiments O. longinoda was as effective as insecticides in controlling major cashew and mango insect pests. Thus, O. longinoda can serve as a substitute to insecticides. iv DECLARATION I, NASSOR RASHID ABDULLA do hereby declare to the Senate of Sokoine University of Agriculture that this thesis is my own original work done within the period of registration and that it has neither been submitted nor being concurrently submitted in any other institution. _________________________________ _____________________ Nassor R. Abdulla Date (PhD Candidate) The above declaration is confirmed _________________________________ _____________________ Dr. G. M. Rwegasira Date (Supervisor) _________________________________ _____________________ Dr. Karl-Martin Vagn Jensen Date (Supervisor) v COPYRIGHT No part of this thesis should be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without a prior written permission of the author or Sokoine University of Agriculture in that behalf. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank the Almighty ALLAH (Subha‟anahu Wata'ala) who kept me healthy and strong from the commencement to the successful completion of this great task. I am highly indebted to my supervisor Dr. Gration M. Rwegasira, Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) Morogoro, Tanzania and co-supervisor Dr. Karl-Martin Vagn Jensen, Department of Agroecology Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark for their dedicated supervision, technical advices, constructive criticism and guidance extended to me during early stages of research proposal development, entire field work and writing of the manuscripts. I am grateful to Prof. Maulid W. Mwatawala, Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, (SUA) Morogoro, Tanzania and Dr. Joachim Offenberg, of the Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark who moulded me with their experienced scientific advices that resulted into the shaping of this work. Special appreciations and thanks are extended to the Director of Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute (NARI), Mtwara, Tanzania for granting a permission to conduct research in their cashew orchards and provision of technical assistance whenever needed. Support from Messrs; Hassan Libubulu, Hamza Mawazo, Mohammed Machunja and Mohammed Salim during the field activities on cashew is acknowledged as well. vii I would also like to thank Mr. Lupembe, owner of the mango orchard at Kibaha for granting a permission to conduct the experiments in his farm. Furthermore I would like to thank Mr. Nsami, E. of the National Biological Control Unit (NBCU), Kibaha Tanzania for provision of space in the laboratory during fruit culturing experiments. Ms. Jesca Isaya and Mr. Saadani Mohammed of NBCU, Kibaha Tanzania are highly appreciated for their excellent assistance during the entire period of field and laboratory works on mango. The advice and encouragement from all members of the Department of Crop Science and Horticulture at SUA and my colleagues at the working station with whom I interacted throughout the course of this study are hereby acknowledged. Equally important are my fellow Postgraduate students in particular, Rozalia G. Rwegasira, William J. George; Wilson A. Nene; Ali Khatib Bakar and Mary A. Ndimbo. The encouragement and moral support from my spouse Asha, our beloved children and all family members for their never ending support, patience and stability during my long absence from home particularly at time of extreme difficulties will always be remembered. Lastly, but definitely not least my profound gratitude goes to the Danish International Development Assistance (DANIDA) for making my dream come true by sponsoring my PhD studies at SUA. The Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MANR), Zanzibar is acknowledged for granting me a study leave. viii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my revered late parents Father, Sheikh Rashid Abdulla Nassor and Mother, Sheikha Nassor Mohammed, the fountain of inspiration in my academic achievements but sadly, they both passed away in 1969 and 2008 respectively. Oh Allah! Please rest their souls in holy spirits – A‟amiyn. ix TABLE OF CONTENTS EXTENDED ABSTRACT .......................................................................................... ii DECLARATION ....................................................................................................... iv COPYRIGHT.............................................................................................................. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... vi DEDICATION ......................................................................................................... viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................. xvii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. xix LIST OF PLATES .................................................................................................. xxii LIST OF PUBLICATIONS (PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL PAPERS) (ABSTRACTS) .................................................................................... xxiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ................................................... xxiv CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................... 1 1.0 General Introduction and Literature Review ............................................................ 1 1.1 Cashew Taxonomy, Origin and Distribution ............................................................ 1 1.2 Description of the Cashew Plant .............................................................................. 2 1.3 Climatic and Soil Requirements .............................................................................. 3 1.4 Importance of Cashew Crop .................................................................................... 4 1.5 Contribution of Cashew in Cash Income Earnings ................................................... 5 1.6 Constraints in Cashew Production ........................................................................... 6 x 1.7 Cashew Insect Pests ................................................................................................ 6 1.7.1 The coconut bugs ............................................................................................... 7 1.7.1.1 Biology of P. wayi....................................................................................... 8 1.7.2 Tea mosquito bugs ............................................................................................. 9 1.7.2.1 Biology of Helopeltis anacardii ............................................................ 10 1.7.2.2 Biology of Helopeltis schoutedeni......................................................... 11 1.7.3
Recommended publications
  • New Records of Some Pests of the Coconut Inflorescence and Developing Fruit and Their Natural Enemies in Sri Lanka
    COCOS, (1987) 5, 39—42 Printed in Sri Lanka New Records of some Pests of the Coconut Inflorescence and Developing Fruit and Their Natural Enemies in Sri Lanka L. C. P. FERNANDO and P. KANAGARATNAM Coconut Research Institute, Lunuwila, Sri Lanka. ABSTRACT A survey was carried out at Bandirippuwa Estate, Kirimetiyana Estate and at Isolated Seed Garden, Rajakadaluwa for the pests of coconut inflorescence and developing fruits. The mite, Dolichotetranychus sp. (Tenuipalpidae) which lives beneath the perianth and feeds on the epicarp, causes considerable damage to the developing fruit. Bi-monthly observations on the intensity of infestation of nuts among different forms of coconut indicated a significant difference among forms in their susceptibility to mite damage. Pseudococcus cocotis (Maskell) (Pseudococcidae), Pseudococcus citriculus Green (Pseudococcidae) and Planococcus lilacinus (Cockereli) (Pseudococcidae), when feeding in large numbers on the peduncle, cause button nut shedding and drying up of the inflo­ rescence. The parasitoids and predators of these mealybugs recorded for the first time in Sri Lanka are Promuscidea unfasciativentris Girault (Aphelinidae) Platygaster sp. (Platygastridae), Anagyrus sp. nr. pseudococci (Girault) (Encyrtidae) Coccodiplosis sp. (Cecidomyiidae), Cryptogonus bryanti Kapur (Coccinellidae) and Pseudoscymnus sp. (Coccinellidae). Several species of scale insects namely, Coccus hesperidum (Linnaeus) (Coccidae) Aulacaspis sp. (Diaspididae), Pseudaulacaspis cockerelli (Cooley) (Diaspididae), Aoni- diella orientalis (Newstead) (Diaspididae), and Pinnaspis strachani (Cooley) (Diaspididae) are recorded as minor pests of the developing fruits of coconut. Coccophagus silvestrii Compere (Aphelinidae), Scymnus sp. (Coccinellidae), Pseudoscymnus sp. (Coccinellidae) Telsimia ceylonica (Weise) (Coccinellidae), Cryptogonus bryanti Kapur (Coccinellidae) and Cybocephalus sp. (Nitidulidae) are recorded as their parasitoids and predators. These natural enemies are probably responsible for the control of these pests in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of the University of California
    fi - w AG R I C U LT U RAL PES T S OF I N DI A , ‘ AN D OF E I AS T ER N AN D S OU T HER N AS A. O O AN D G I BB M RRIS N , ' P E r' o H ER J Y S T AT I ON ER Y OF F C E RINT RS MA EST S I . AGRICULTURAL PESTS OF A INDI , AN D OF EAS T ER N AN D S OU T HER N A IA S , VEG ET ABLE AN D AN I MAL , I N JUR I OUS T O MAN AN D HI S PR OD U C T S . R EON EN ER AL ED WAR D BALF OU R S U G G , C O E PO D G B OF T H E I MPER I AL -R OY AL G OL OG C L I N S T I T U T E V E RR S N IN MEM ER E I A , I NNA ; FELLOW OF T H E M AD R AS U NIVERSIT Y ; AU T H OR OF “ ’ m mC YC L OPE D OF I N D I A AN D O F EAS T ER N AN D OU HE A S I A IA S T RN , “ ’ rm: B T EES OF I N D I A AN D OF AN D OU H S ma TIM ER ! EASTERN S T ERN A IA , ; F OU N D ER OF T H E G OVER N MEN T C EN T R AL U U MAD R A S M SE M, ; OF T H E MYS OR E U U B G LO ET C .
    [Show full text]
  • Helopeltis Spp.) on Cashew (Anacardium Occidentale Linn.
    Journal of Cell and Animal Biology Vol. 6(14), pp. 200-206, September 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JCAB DOI: 10.5897/JCAB11.094 ISSN 1996-0867 ©2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Field survey and comparative biology of tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis spp.) on cashew (Anacardium occidentale Linn.) Srikumar K. K.1* and P. Shivarama Bhat2 Department of Entomology, Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur, Karnataka 574 202, India. Accepted 8 August, 2012 Cashew (Anacardium occidentale Linn.) has become a very important tree crop in India. Several insect pests, however, have been recorded on cashew and prominent among which is the tea mosquito bug (TMB), Helopeltis spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae). Field survey from November 2009 to November 2011 suggests that Helopeltis antonii was dominant, which accounted for 82% of all Helopeltis spp. collected; whereas, Helopeltis bradyi and Helopeltis theivora accounted for 12 and 6%, respectively. No significant differences in egg hatchability percentage among the three species were observed. The study showed that there is significant variation in developmental rate of 2nd, 3rd and 4th instar nymphs of Helopeltis spp. The total developmental time for H. antonii, H. bradyi and H. theivora were 224.19, 211.38 and 214.59 hours, respectively. Survival rates of the nymphal instars of H. antonii were significantly high compared to H. bradyi and H. theivora. The sex ratio of H. antonii was highly female biased. The adults of H. bradyi and H.theivora survived longer and produced significantly higher number of eggs than H. antonii. The outcome of this study is very important in planning control as insect monitoring and biological studies are important components of Integrated Pest Management (IPM).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Damage Caused by the Coconut Bug Pseudotheraptus Wayi (Brown) (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Guavas
    Fruits - vol . 47, n°2, 1992 31 7 Assessment of damage caused by the coconut bug Pseudotheraptus wayi (Brown) (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on guavas. T. VAN DER MEULEN * ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE COCONUT BUG EVALUATION DES DEGATS CAUSES PAR LE PARASITE DE S PSEUDOTHERAPTUS WAY! (BROWN) (HEMIPTERA : COCOTIERS , PSEUDOTHERAPTUS WAY! (BROWN) COREIDAE) ON GUAVAS . (HEMIPTERA : COREIDAE) SUR GOYAVES. T . VAN DER MEULEN . T. VAN DER MEULEN . Fruits, Mar .-Apr . 1992, vol . 47, n° 2, p .317-320 . Fruits, Mar : Apr . 1992, vol . 47, n° 2, p .317-320 . ABSTRACT - Damage caused by the coconut bug, Pseudotheraptu s RESUME - Sur goyaves, les dégâts causés par Pseudotheraptus wayi , wayi on guavas was studied in the Nelspruit Area . Three orchards, an d parasite du cocotier, ont été étudiés dans la région de Nelspruit . Dans 10 trees per orchard, were monitored weekly, from fruit drop unti l trois vergers, dix arbres par verger ont été observés chaque semaine , harvest . None of these orchards were sprayed with insecticides . de la nouaison à la récolte . Aucun de ces vergers na subi de traite- Average of 30 per cent of the aborted fruits and 26 per cent of th e ments insecticides . En moyenne, 30 p . 100 des fruits avortés et 26 p . ripe fruits were damaged . 100 des fruits parvenus à maturité ont été endommagés . INTRODUCTIO N readily when disturbed . Each individual makes about 200 punctures in the course of its existence . The insect lives i n The coconut bug, Pseudotheraptus wayi (Brown) (He- the crown of the palm throughout its life and the nymphs miptera : Coreidae) indigenous to East-Africa on coconut s are found only on or near the spadix .
    [Show full text]
  • Ants: Major Functional Elements in Fruit Agro-Ecosystems and Biological Control Agents
    sustainability Review Ants: Major Functional Elements in Fruit Agro-Ecosystems and Biological Control Agents Lamine Diamé 1,2,*, Jean-Yves Rey 1,3,6, Jean-François Vayssières 3,6, Isabelle Grechi 4,6, Anaïs Chailleux 3,5,6 ID and Karamoko Diarra 2 1 Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Centre pour le Développement de l’Horticulture, BP 3120 Dakar, Senegal; [email protected] 2 Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, BP 7925 Dakar, Senegal; [email protected] 3 Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UPR HortSys, F-34398 Montpellier, France; jean-franç[email protected] (J.F.V.); [email protected] (A.C.) 4 Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UPR HortSys, F-97455 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France; [email protected] 5 Biopass, Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles—University Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar—Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, BP 2274 Dakar, Senegal 6 University de Montpellier, Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, HortSys, F-34398 Montpellier, France * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 October 2017; Accepted: 12 December 2017; Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract: Ants are a very diverse taxonomic group. They display remarkable social organization that has enabled them to be ubiquitous throughout the world. They make up approximately 10% of the world’s animal biomass. Ants provide ecosystem services in agrosystems by playing a major role in plant pollination, soil bioturbation, bioindication, and the regulation of crop-damaging insects. Over recent decades, there have been numerous studies in ant ecology and the focus on tree cropping systems has given added importance to ant ecology knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Morphology and Systematics (Ento-131) - Notes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276175248 Insect Morphology and Systematics (Ento-131) - Notes Book · April 2010 CITATIONS READS 0 14,110 1 author: Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao National Institute of Plant Health Management (NIPHM), Hyderabad, India 36 PUBLICATIONS 22 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Agricultural College, Jagtial View project ICAR-All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues View project All content following this page was uploaded by Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao on 12 May 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Insect Morphology and Systematics ENTO-131 (2+1) Revised Syllabus Dr. Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao Associate Professor & Head, Department of Entomology, Agricultural College, JAGTIAL EntoEnto----131131131131 Insect Morphology & Systematics Prepared by Dr. Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao M.Sc.(Ag.), Ph.D.(IARI) Associate Professor & Head Department of Entomology Agricultural College Jagtial-505529 Karminagar District 1 Page 2010 Insect Morphology and Systematics ENTO-131 (2+1) Revised Syllabus Dr. Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao Associate Professor & Head, Department of Entomology, Agricultural College, JAGTIAL ENTO 131 INSECT MORPHOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS Total Number of Theory Classes : 32 (32 Hours) Total Number of Practical Classes : 16 (40 Hours) Plan of course outline: Course Number : ENTO-131 Course Title : Insect Morphology and Systematics Credit Hours : 3(2+1) (Theory+Practicals) Course In-Charge : Dr. Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao Associate Professor & Head Department of Entomology Agricultural College, JAGTIAL-505529 Karimanagar District, Andhra Pradesh Academic level of learners at entry : 10+2 Standard (Intermediate Level) Academic Calendar in which course offered : I Year B.Sc.(Ag.), I Semester Course Objectives: Theory: By the end of the course, the students will be able to understand the morphology of the insects, and taxonomic characters of important insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Tea Mosquito Bug (Helopeltis Anto- Nii Signoret) and Its Management in Guava
    Popular Article Journal Home: www.bioticainternational.com Article: RT0129 How to cite this article? Biotica Bose et al., 2020. Tea Mosquito Bug (Helopeltis antonii Signoret) and its Management in Guava. Research Today Research [2(5) Spl.: 333-334. [ Today 333 Abstract Vol 2:5 uava is a common tropical fruit cultivated in many tropical and 334 subtropical regions. Its production was severely affected by 2020 Spl. Gmany insect pests. The tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis antonii is one such pest causes economic damage to guava in the recent years causing significant reduction in yield and marketable fruits. This pest Tea Mosquito Bug can be well efficiently managed by following integrated management practices viz. cultural, biological and chemical methods. (Helopeltis anto- Introduction uava (Psidium guajava L.) is one of the most important nii Signoret) and commercial fruit crop in India. It is rich source of Gvitamin C, pectin and minerals. The production of its Management in guava was drastically affected by many insect pests. Among them, the tea mosquito bug causes severe damage to the Guava fruits. In India, there are three species of tea mosquito bug viz., 1* 2 Helopeltis antonii, H. bradyi and H. theivora were reported. A. Subash Chandra Bose , I. Rabeena Among them, H. antonii is the most dominant species. It has 3 and T. Sathyan a wide host range such as tea, cashew, moringa, guava, neem, 1S. Thangapazham Agriculture College, Vasudevanallur cocoa and other host plants. The yield loss can be minimized Tirunelveli (627 760), India by following proper management practices. The damage 2Agricultural College and Research Institute, TNAU, Madurai symptoms caused by them and their management measures (641 003), India are given below.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Pest Free Areas
    JUNE 2019 ENG Capacity Development Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Pest Free Areas Understanding the principal requirements for pest free areas, pest free places of production, pest free production sites and areas of low pest prevalence JUNE 2019 Capacity Development Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Pest Free Areas Understanding the principal requirements for pest free areas, pest free places of production, pest free production sites and areas of low pest prevalence Required citation: FAO. 2019. Guide for establishing and maintaining pest free areas. Rome. Published by FAO on behalf of the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The designations employed and the presentation of material in the map(s) do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Azadirachta Indica Meliaceae A. Juss
    Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Meliaceae neem LOCAL NAMES Amharic (kinin); Arabic (nim,neem); Bengali (nimgach,nim); Burmese (bowtamaka,thinboro,tamarkha,tamar,tamaka,tamabin); Cantonese (nimba,kohomba,bevu); Chamorro (sdau); Creole (nim); English (Persian lilac,neem tree,bastard tree,Indian lilac,bead tree,margosa tree,cornucopia,Indian cedar); French (margousier,margosier,neem,nim,azadirac de l’Inde); Hindi (neem,balnimb,nim,veppam,nind,vempu); Indonesian (mind,intaran,membha,imba,mempheuh,mimba); Javanese (mimba,imba); Khmer (sdau); Lao (Sino-Tibetan) (ka dao,kadau); Malay Immature fruits (Schmutterer H.) (sadu,baypay,mambu,veppam); Nepali (neem); Sanskrit (nimba); Sinhala (kohomba); Swahili (mwarubaini,mwarubaini kamili,mkilifi); Tamil (vepa,veppu,veppam,vembu); Thai (sadao,kadao,sadao India,khwinin,saliam,cha-tang); Tigrigna (nim); Trade name (neem); Vietnamese (saafu daau,sàu-dàu,s[aaf]u d[aa]u) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Azadirachta indica is a small to medium-sized tree, usually evergreen, up to 15 (30 max.) m tall, with a round, large crown up to 10 (20 max.) m in diameter; branches spreading; bole branchless for up to 7.5 m, up to 90 cm in diameter, sometimes fluted at base; bark moderately thick, with Trees in Mindinao, Philippines (Anthony small, scattered tubercles, deeply fissured and flaking in old trees, dark Simons) grey outside and reddish inside, with colourless, sticky foetid sap. Leaves alternate, crowded near the end of branches, simply pinnate, 20- 40 cm long, exstipulate, light green, with 2 pairs of glands at the base, otherwise glabrous; petiole 2-7 cm long, subglabrous; rachis channelled above; leaflets 8-19, very short petioluled, alternate proximally and more or less opposite distally, ovate to lanceolate, sometimes falcate (min.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pests, Part A
    Chapter Nine Major Insect Pests of Tea in Viet Nam 9.1 HOW TO DETERMINE WHICH INSECT PEST IS DAMAGING THE CROP .................................................... 146 9.2 SMALL SUCKING INSECTS ON LEAVES OR BUDS .................................................................................. 147 9.3 CATERPILLARS ON LEAVES OR BUDS ................................................................................................... 177 9.4 RED BORER IN BRANCHES OR STEMS ...................................................................................................181 9.5 TERMITES ON ROOTS AND STEMS ........................................................................................................ 182 9.1 How to determine which insect pest is damaging the crop If you already have seen an insect feeding on your tea, then you can go directly to the section of the chapter that tells about that insect. But, often it is hard to observe or catch the insect in the field. Maybe you have only seen some damage or some unusual changes in your tea plants. If you have not yet found the insect that is causing the problem, then look in the following table to find the symptoms that you are seeing in your tea field. You may have several different symptoms at the same time. Then, read the sections of the Guide that match your symptoms. Remember: some plant diseases (and even some chemicals) cause symptoms that look like damage from insects! Symptoms Possible cause(s) Read this section: Curled, deformed leaves Aphids, mites, mosquito bug (see 9.2
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit Flies and Mango Seed Weevil in Relation to Quarantine
    FRUIT FLIES AND MANGO SEED WEEVIL IN RELATION TO QUARANTINE Wallace C. Mitchell Emeritus Professor, Department of Entomology College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources University of Hawaii at Manoa I am surprised so many came to this meeting, I shall briefly discuss the mango insect pests in because the commercial value of mangos is not Hawaii. Special emphasis will be given to tephritid very large. In fact, I have always considered it to fruit flies and the mango weevil, Cryptorhynchus be nil as far as Hawaii is concerned. Looking at mangiferae (Fabricius). We have 13 insect and the group here, I will bet that the total value of mite pests that attack mangos in Hawaii. Some of your efforts, salaries, etc. for these three days these and their commodity treatments will be added together is greater than the annual value of discussed by other speakers. The mango shoot commercial production of mangos in Hawaii. In caterpillar is a noctuid moth that is a minor the Hawaii Department of Agriculture'S statistics problem. There are a number of scales for 1991, mangos were included under the tropical (Homoptera). The mango soft scale, Protopul­ specialty fruit sales, with a farm value of $46,600. vinaria mangiferae (Green), the green scale, The farm price was 73 cents a pound. There were Coccus viridus (Green), the red wax scale, 40 farms totaling 65 acres with 2,750 trees of which Ceroplastes rubens Maskell, and the Cockerell 810 were bearing. So, you see, we have a long way scale (white scale), Pseudaulacaspis cockererelli to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Rüsselkäfer (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) Der Schweiz – Checkliste Mit Verbreitungsangaben Nach Biogeografischen Regionen
    MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 83: 41–118, 2010 Die Rüsselkäfer (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) der Schweiz – Checkliste mit Verbreitungsangaben nach biogeografischen Regionen CHRISTOPH GERMANN Natur-Museum Luzern, Kasernenplatz 6, 6003 Luzern und Naturhistorisches Museum der Burger ge - meinde Bern, Bernastrasse 15, 3006 Bern; Email: [email protected] The weevils of Switzerland – Checklist (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea), with distribution data by bio - geo graphic regions. – A checklist of the Swiss weevils (Curculionoidea) including distributional pat- terns based on 6 bio-geographical regions is presented. Altogether, the 1060 species and subspecies out of the 10 families are composed of 21 Anthribidae, 129 Apionidae, 3 Attelabidae, 847 Cur cu lio - ni dae, 7 Dryophthoridae, 9 Erirhinidae, 13 Nanophyidae, 3 Nemonychidae, 3 Raymondionymidae, and 25 Rhynchitidae. Further, 13 synanthropic, 42 introduced species as well as 127 species, solely known based on old records, are given. For all species their synonymous names used in Swiss litera- ture are provided. 151 species classified as doubtful for the Swiss fauna are listed separately. Keywords: Curculionoidea, Checklist, Switzerland, faunistics, distribution EINLEITUNG Rüsselkäfer im weiteren Sinn (Curculionoidea) stellen mit über 62.000 bisher beschriebenen Arten und gut weiteren 150.000 zu erwartenden Arten (Oberprieler et al. 2007) die artenreichste Käferfamilie weltweit dar. Die ungeheure Vielfalt an Arten, Farben und Formen oder verschiedenartigsten Lebensweisen und damit ein - her gehenden Anpassungen fasziniert immer wieder aufs Neue. Eine auffällige Gemein samkeit aller Rüsselkäfer ist der verlängerte Kopf, welcher als «Rostrum» (Rüssel) bezeichnet wird. Rüsselkäfer sind als Phyto phage stets auf ihre Wirts- pflanzen angewiesen und folgen diesen bei uns von Unter wasser-Biotopen im pla- naren Bereich (u.a.
    [Show full text]