DOCSLIB.ORG

Fire Department Evaluation and Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fire Department Evaluation and Master Plan Sandoval County Fire Department, New Mexico Emergency Services Master Plan May 2016 Sandoval County (NM) Fire Department Emergency Services Master Plan 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 Evaluation of Current Conditions ......................................................................................... 18 Organizational Overview ......................................................................................................................... 19 Governance ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Organizational Design ......................................................................................................................... 19 Service Area and Infrastructure .......................................................................................................... 22 Management Components ..................................................................................................................... 25 Foundational Management Elements ................................................................................................ 25 Agency Communication ...................................................................................................................... 25 Record Keeping and Documentation .................................................................................................. 26 Fiscal Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 28 Staffing and Personnel Management ..................................................................................................... 54 Personnel Overview ............................................................................................................................ 55 Training Staff ....................................................................................................................................... 57 Staffing Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 57 Volunteer Staffing ............................................................................................................................... 59 Training ................................................................................................................................................... 63 General Training Competencies .......................................................................................................... 65 Training Methodology, Operation and Performance ......................................................................... 65 Training Administration ...................................................................................................................... 66 Training Facilities ................................................................................................................................ 67 Capital Assets .......................................................................................................................................... 68 Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 69 Apparatus ............................................................................................................................................ 91 Service Delivery and Performance .......................................................................................................... 97 Demand ............................................................................................................................................... 97 Distribution ....................................................................................................................................... 104 Concentration ................................................................................................................................... 110 Reliability .......................................................................................................................................... 112 Response Performance ..................................................................................................................... 112 Mutual and Automatic Aid ................................................................................................................ 116 Future System Demand Projections ................................................................................... 119 Population Growth Projections ........................................................................................................ 119 Community Risk Analysis .................................................................................................................. 120 Service Demand Projections ............................................................................................................. 123 Future Delivery System Models ............................................................................................................ 124 Sandoval Master Plan Report i Sandoval County (NM) Fire Department Emergency Services Master Plan 2016 Response Standards and Targets ...................................................................................................... 124 Short-Term Strategies ........................................................................................................ 130 Priority 1 – Items Involving Immediate Internal Safety Concerns .................................................... 130 Priority 2 – Considerations That May Present Legal or Financial Exposure ..................................... 131 Priority 3 – Matters That Address a Service Delivery Issue .............................................................. 131 Priority 4 – Considerations to Enhance the Delivery of Services ...................................................... 131 Priority 5 – An Important Thing to Do .............................................................................................. 131 Additional Commentary on Staffing ................................................................................................. 132 Mid-Term Strategies .......................................................................................................... 133 Future Staffing .................................................................................................................................. 134 Training ............................................................................................................................................. 134 SCFD Administration Building ........................................................................................................... 135 Strategic Planning ............................................................................................................................. 135 Long-Term Strategies ......................................................................................................... 136 Apparatus Replacement Planning ..................................................................................................... 136 Emergency Communications ............................................................................................................ 140 Revenue and Expenditure Forecast ...................................................................................................... 142 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 149 Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 150 Appendix A: Table of Figures ................................................................................................................ 150 Appendix B: Data Survey Tables ........................................................................................................... 155 ii Sandoval Master Plan Report Sandoval County (NM) Fire Department Emergency Services Master Plan 2016 Executive Summary Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) was engaged by Sandoval County Fire Department (SCFD) to conduct an emergency services master plan. This report is the culmination of that evaluation. Throughout this document, the Sandoval County Fire Department is alternatively referred to as SCFD, Sandoval County, the agency, or client. PURPOSE AND APPROACH The purpose of the study was to: A. Assess the current fiscal, service level, and infrastructure conditions of the agency; recommending improvements to the existing processes where appropriate. B. Predict the community growth and development; assessing the impact of that predicted growth on the emergency service delivery system. C. Recommend short, mid, and long-term strategies to increase efficiency and effectiveness; planning for investments to stay ahead of the impacts that will likely be felt by the community in response to predicted growth. This report evaluated the agency, as it existed when ESCI consultants arrived
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Fire Ecology July 1.Qxd
    Investigating Fire Ecology in Ponderosa Pine Forests 2004/First Edition A Field Guide for Sixth Grade Teachers This project was made possible by generous contributions of: Publishing Information This curriculum guide was created with funding from the NPS Fire Program and Challenge Cost Share Programs. Funding for implementation was provided by the NPS Parks As Classrooms program. All right s are not reserved. Materials in this guide may be reproduced by teachers for classroom use i.e., student handout s, transp arencies, etc. All right s are reserved for all other uses. The listing of a resource in this curriculum does not presume it s endorsement by the National Park Service. This guide may be obtained by p articip ating in a teacher workshop or by visiting the Bandelier website at www.nps.gov/band. Teachers are encouraged to offer their feedback by filling out the enclosed evaluation form or con - tacting the VTF or WPS directly. Printed on recycled p aper using soy-based inks. PREFACE hen the more than 18,000 residents of Los Alamos, New Mexico awoke W on May 6, 2000, they were unaware that within the next ninety-six hours their sleepy, relaxed mount ainside community would be forever changed. A small wildland fire approximately five miles southwest of town was rapidly growing. The fire was named for the peak of it s origin, Cerro Grande. As resident s uneasily watched the column of smoke rising from the thickly forested backdrop to town, over the next days firefighters battled the blaze with mixed success. On the morning of Wednesday, May 10th, represent atives of a wide range of government agencies, including New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, visited Los Alamos to assess the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Form 3805V
    2017 Instructions for Form FTB 3805V Net Operating Loss (NOL) Computation and NOL and Disaster Loss Limitations — Individuals, Estates, and Trusts References in these instructions are to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of January 1, 2015, and the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). General Information For NOLs incurred in taxable years beginning Nonbusiness capital losses and gains are on or after January 1, 2008, California has losses and gains from other than a trade or In general, for taxable years beginning on or extended the NOL carryover period from 10 business. These include sales of stock, metals, after January 1, 2015, California law conforms taxable years to 20 taxable years following the and other appreciable assets as well as any to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of year of the loss. recognized gain from the sale of your principal January 1, 2015. However, there are continuing For taxable years that began in 2002 and residence. differences between California and federal 2003, California suspended the NOL carryover Business losses: law. When California conforms to federal tax deduction. Taxpayers continued to compute You may deduct business capital losses only law changes, we do not always adopt all of and carryover an NOL during the suspension up to the total of business capital gains and the changes made at the federal level. For period. However, the deduction for disaster any nonbusiness capital gains that remain after more information, go to ftb.ca.gov and search losses was not affected by the NOL suspension deducting nonbusiness capital losses and other for conformity.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire
    GREATER FLAGSTAFF AREA COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN REVIEW & REVISION May 2012 1 PURPOSE In the summer of 2011, the Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership (GFFP) and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (PFAC) initiated a project to “review” the “Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Flagstaff and Surrounding Communities in tHe Coconino and Kaibab National Forests of Coconino County, Arizona” (CWPP). First approved in 2005, the CWPP review is designed to assess the status of implementation activities and evaluate progress towards desired goals. Although not required per the authorizing legislation (Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 - HFRA), nor by the CWPP itself, this was intended to analyze activity within the CWPP area that addressed goals or was influenced by the plan, and to develop a report for local government and land management agencies on findings - it was not designed to revise the text or intent of the CWPP. Primary emphasis was placed on summarizing treatment activity to date and reviewing the “Improved Protection Capabilities” section included on pages 40-43 of the Plan. INTRODUCTION The Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire Protection Plan was approved by the Arizona State Forester, Coconino County, City of Flagstaff, and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (representing local fire departments and fire districts) in January of 2005. Jointly developed by the GFFP and PFAC, the plan covered a 939,736-acre area centered on Flagstaff. Working closely with US Forest Service staff and the NAU Forest Ecosystem Restoration Analysis (Forest ERA) program, the CWPP was designed to address the following Goal, Objectives and Principles (quoted form the CWPP): GOAL To protect Flagstaff and surrounding communities, and associated values and infrastructure, from catastrophic wildfire by means of: a) An educated and involved public, b) Implementation of forest treatment projects designed to reduce wildfire threat and improve long term forest health, in a progressive and prioritized manner, and c) Utilization of FireWise building techniques and principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Ecology of Ponderosa Pine and the Rebuilding of Fire-Resilient Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems 1
    Fire Ecology of Ponderosa Pine and the Rebuilding of Fire-Resilient Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems 1 Stephen A. Fitzgerald2 Abstract The ponderosa pine ecosystems of the West have change dramatically since Euro-American settlement 140 years ago due to past land uses and the curtailment of natural fire. Today, ponderosa pine forests contain over abundance of fuel, and stand densities have increased from a range of 49-124 trees ha-1 (20-50 trees acre-1) to a range of 1235-2470 trees ha-1 (500 to 1000 stems acre-1). As a result, long-term tree, stand, and landscape health has been compromised and stand and landscape conditions now promote large, uncharacteristic wildfires. Reversing this trend is paramount. Improving the fire-resiliency of ponderosa pine forests requires understanding the connection between fire behavior and severity and forest structure and fuels. Restoration treatments (thinning, prescribed fire, mowing and other mechanical treatments) that reduce surface, ladder, and crown fuels can reduce fire severity and the potential for high-intensity crown fires. Understanding the historical role of fire in shaping ponderosa pine ecosystems is important for designing restoration treatments. Without intelligent, ecosystem-based restoration treatments in the near term, forest health and wildfire conditions will continue to deteriorate in the long term and the situation is not likely to rectify itself. Introduction Historically, ponderosa pine ecosystems have had an intimate and inseparable relationship with fire. No other disturbance has had such a re-occurring influence on the development and maintenance of ponderosa pine ecosystems. Historically this relationship with fire varied somewhat across the range of ponderosa pine, and it varied temporally in concert with changes in climate.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan
    Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 MMU Strategic Fire Plan Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Section Date Numbers Description of Update Updated By Updated Updated 4/2020 Contents Page i-ii 2020 Update P4224 4/2020 Signature Page 1 Annual Update P4224 4/2020 Executive 2 Update C4200 Summary 4/2020 I Update P4224 4/2020 II None P4224 4/2020 III Update P4224 4/2020 IV Update B4220 4/2020 IV (B) Update F4208 3/2020 V Update All Battalions 4/2020 Appendix A Update P4224 4/2020 Appendix B None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-1 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-2 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix D None B4220 4/2020 Appendix E Update B4220 3/2020 Appendix F New P4224 4/2020 Appendix G Update B4211 3/2020 Appendix H None B4212 3/2020 Appendix I Update B4214 4/2020 Appendix J None B4215 4/2020 Appendix K None B16 4/2020 Appendix L None B17 3/2020 Appendix M Update B18 4/2020 Appendix N Update D4206 4/2020 Exhibits: Maps None GIS 4/2020 Accomplishments Update Various i Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 Table of Contents UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS ............................................................. i Table of Contents .............................................................................................................ii SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Declarations in California
    Disaster Declarations in California (BOLD=Major Disaster) (Wildfires are Highlighted) 2018 DR-4353 Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows, And Debris Flows Declared on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 - 06:00 FM-5244 Pawnee Fire Declared on Sunday, June 24, 2018 - 07:11 FM-5245 Creek Fire Declared on Monday, June 25, 2018 - 07:11 2017 DR-4301 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 13:15 EM-3381 Potential Failure of the Emergency Spillway at Lake Oroville Dam Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:20 DR-4302 Severe Winter Storm Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:30 DR-4305 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 04:48 DR-4308 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Mudslides Declared on Saturday, April 1, 2017 - 16:55 DR-4312 Flooding Declared on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 - 14:00 FM-5189 Wall Fire Declared on Sunday, July 9, 2017 - 14:18 FM-5192 Detwiler Fire Declared on Monday, July 17, 2017 - 19:23 DR-4344 Wildfires Declared on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 08:40 2016 FM-5124 Old Fire Declared on Saturday, June 4, 2016 - 21:55 FM-5128 Border 3 Fire Declared on Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:03 FM-5129 Fish Fire Declared on Monday, June 20, 2016 - 20:35 FM-5131 Erskine Fire Declared on Thursday, June 23, 2016 - 20:57 FM-5132 Sage Fire Declared on Saturday, July 9, 2016 - 18:15 FM-5135 Sand Fire Declared on Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 17:34 FM-5137 Soberanes Fire Declared on Thursday, July 28, 2016 - 16:38 FM-5140 Goose Fire Declared on Saturday, July 30, 2016 - 20:48
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Backed Woodpecker (Picoides Arcticus) Status Review Under the California Endangered Species Act
    Black-backed Woodpecker (Picoides arcticus) Status Review under the California Endangered Species Act John Muir Project of Earth Island Institute and Center for Biological Diversity February 11, 2013 Prepared by Chad Hanson, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Executive Summary 1 I. Habitat Essential to the Continued Existence of the Species 4 A. Range of Subspecies 4 B. Suitable Habitat 8 1. Nesting Habitat 9 2. Foraging Habitat 14 3. Home-range Size 17 II. Listing the Black-backed Woodpecker is Warranted Because the Continued Existence of the Black-backed Woodpecker in California is in Serious Danger or is Likely to Become So in the Foreseeable Future Due to One or More Listing Factors 19 A. Present or Threatened Modification or Destruction of the BBWO’s Habitat 19 1. BBWO Habitat Loss Relative to Historic Extent 19 2. Extreme Scarcity of Moderate and High Quality Suitable Habitat 22 3. Destruction of Habitat and Lack of Regulatory Mechanisms to Protect the Species or Its Habitat 28 a. Post-disturbance Salvage Logging 28 b. Ongoing Fire Suppression 32 c. Forest Thinning—Suppression of Natural Tree Mortality 32 4. Current Laws and Regulations Do Not Protect BBWO Habitat 34 a. Public Land 34 i. U.S. Forest Service’s Elimination of the Wildlife Viability Requirement 34 ii. Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment 2001 and 2004 36 iii. Northwest Forest Plan 1994 Record of Decision 39 b. Private Lands 40 i. California Forest Practices Rules 40 ii. Oregon Forest Practices Act 42 5. Significant Post-fire Salvage Logging is Occurring on Public and Private Lands 42 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management Today Is Published by the Forest Service of the U.S
    Fire today ManagementVolume 62 • No. 2 • Spring 2002 NATIONAL FIRE PLANLAN United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at <http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/planning/firenote.htm>. Ann M. Veneman, Secretary April J. Baily U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Jerry Williams, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing High-Cost Wildfires in Relation to the Natural Distribution of Ponderosa Pine in the 11 Western States (2000-2017)
    PEER REVIEW: HIGH-COST WILDFIRES ASSESSING HIGH-COST WILDFIRES IN RELATION TO THE NATURAL DISTRIBUTION OF PONDEROSA PINE IN THE 11 WESTERN STATES (2000-2017) This coarse-resolution assessment suggests 1990s that much of the West’s wildfire problem traces Figure 1: A comparison of a frequent, low intensity fire maintained ponderosa pine forest circa 1897 (left and on to the deteriorated the cover), and a ponderosa-pine dominated forest where fire has been long excluded circa 1990s (above). condition of its dry ponderosa pine sites. wildfire costs, losses, damages, and dangers have climbed at alarming Following more than a century of high-grade logging, livestock rates. Since 2000, at least 7 of the 11 western states have suffered their grazing, and the virtual elimination of frequent, low-intensity surface worst wildfires on record (Williams and Hyde, 2009; Williams, 2014). burning, these forests are much changed, in terms of species compo- Despite a half-century of movement toward a fire management model, sition, stand structure, density, and fuel loading (Figure 1). In turn, INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND the concept’s goals for reigning in costs, improving margins of safety, these changes have predisposed broad landscapes to high-intensity In this analysis we introduce a broad-scale long-term overview of and restoring ecological integrity have not been realized. stand-replacement wildfires that often remain uncontrollable until the US West’s costliest wildfires in relation to the natural distribu- A number of agency reports, research papers, field studies, staff- firefighters can capitalize on a change in weather or exploit a break tion of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Effects on a Ponderosa Pine Ecosystem: an Arizona Case Study
    Wildfire Effects on a Ponderosa Pine Ecosystem: An Arizona Case Study R. E. Campbell, M. B. Baker, Jr., P. F. Ffolliott, F. R. Larson, and C. C. Avery Abstract A wildfire of variable severity swept through 717 acres (290 ha) of ponderosa pine forest in north-central Arizona in May 1972. Where the fire was intense it killed 90% of the small trees and 50% of the sawtimber, burned 2.6 in (6.5 cm) of forest floor to the mineral soil, and induced a water-repellent layer in the sandier soils. The re- duced infiltration rates, which greatly increased water yield from severely burned areas during unusually heavy fall rains, caused soils to erode and removed some nutrients which had been rnineral- ized by the fire. Water yields have declined each year toward prefire levels. Soluble nutrients leached into the surface soil during fall rains were subsequently removed by a record snowmelt. Succes- sional changes provided up to 1,650 lblacre (1,850 kglha) of herbage production compared to about 515 lblacre (577 kglha) in unburned forest. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-191 September 1977 Wildfire Effects on a Ponderosa Pine Ecosystem: AnArizona Case Study R. E. Campbell, M. B. Baker, Jr., P. F. Ffolliott, F. R. Larson, and C. C. Avery Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station1 Central headquarters is maintained at Fort Collins, in cooperation with Colorado State University. Camp- bell, Research Soil Scientist, Baker, Associate Hydrologist, and Larson, Silviculturist, are located at the Sjation's Research Work Unit at Flagstaff, in cooperation with Northern Arizona University; Ffolliott is Associate Profes- sor in the School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson; Avery is Associate Professor in the School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountain Wind Project Draft
    3. Environmental Analysis 3.16 Wildfire 3.16 Wildfire The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) has assigned a “Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone” rating throughout Shasta County (Shasta County, 2016). Round Mountain, Montgomery Creek, and Burney all are listed as communities at risk by CAL FIRE’s Office of the State Fire Marshal (CAL FIRE, 2019a). This section identifies and evaluates issues related to wildfire in the context of the Project and alternatives. It includes information about the physical and regulatory setting and identifies the criteria used to evaluate the significance of potential impacts, the methods used in evaluating these impacts, and the results of the impact assessment. The Shasta County Fire Department provided initial input and recommendations related to fire prevention for the County’s environmental review process shortly after the CUP application was filed for the Project (Shasta County Fire Department, 2018). Later, in response to the issuance of notice of intention to prepare this Draft EIR, the County received scoping input noting that existing conditions are windy and the terrain is steep (up to 25 percent grade), and that there is a history of lightning strikes and fires, both natural and human-caused, in the area. Options for ingress and egress are limited. Furthermore, the existing forest, which was planted after the Fountain Fire, is mostly pine. Trees are approximately 20 to 30 feet tall and grow 3 to 4 feet apart, deer brush and manzanita grow in the understory, and years’ worth of pine needles cover the forest floor. Input as to potential impacts and mitigation measures also was received.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning, Funding, and Implementing Fuels Reduction and Wildfire Education in Butte County
    Planning, Funding, and Implementing Fuels Reduction and Wildfire Education in Butte County Special Report on the North Complex Wildfire By Butte County Fire Safe Council 10/7/2020 Contents 1. Problem Statement - Wildfire in Butte County – a 20-Year Snapshot - How Much Funding Has Been Utilized? - How Many Projects are Listed? - What is the Future of Funding? a. Why is CEQA a Challenge? Examples of Challenges b. How Can CEQA Be Streamlined for Fuels Reduction in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)? 2. Examples – Challenges in implementing Fuels Reduction 3. Supporting Information Appendix 1) Large fires within Butte County between - 1999 & 2020 Appendix 2) Summary of Funding Leveraged in Berry Creek and Feather Falls Prior to and After 2018 Appendix 3) Summary of Funding Leveraged in the Past Two Years Appendix 4) Project List Submitted to the Sierra East Side Forest Management Task Force April 2020 Appendix 5) New Projects Added to the CAL FIRE Butte Unit/Community Wildfire Protection Plan in 2020 Appendix 6) A Survivor’s Story from Berry Creek “Tragedy and Triumph” Butte County Fire Safe Council, 5619 Black Olive Dr. Paradise Ca, 95969 [email protected], 530-877-0984 1 Map of the Wildland Urban Interface in Butte County 2 1. Problem Statement In the past 20 years there have been 400,000 acres burned and 20,000 structures destroyed due to wildfire in Butte County (Appendix 1). If you calculate an average of 4 people per structure that equals 80,000 people impacted with structure loss alone, not to mention the loss of community resources, air quality, family impacts and forest loss.
    [Show full text]