DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management; October 26-28,1988; Sacramento, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management; October 26-28,1988; Sacramento, California United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings of the Symposium Forest Service on Fire and Watershed Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Management General Technical Report PSW-109 October 26-28, 1988, Sacramento, California Neil H. Berg, Technical Coordinator Berg, Neil H., technical coordinator. 1989. Proceedings of the symposium on fire and watershed management; October 26-28,1988; Sacramento, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-109. Berkeley, CA: Pacific South- west Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture; 164 p. The proceedings is a collection of papers presented at the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management—the second biennial conference of the Watershed Management Council—held in Sacramento, California, October 26-28, 1988. Included are two luncheon addresses, seven papers on land use decisions and fire risk, eight papers on effects of fire on watersheds, eight papers on resource recovery, and fifteen poster papers that offer perspectives from research, technology applications, and land and resource management. Retrieval Terms: fire management, resource recovery, resource rehabilita- tion, watershed management Authors took responsibility for preparing papers in camera-ready format. Views expressed in each paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsoring organizations. Trade names and commercial enterprises mentioned are solely for information and do not imply the endorsement of the sponsoring organizations. Publisher: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station P.O. Box 245, Berkeley, California 94701 March 1989 Berg, Neil H., technical coordinator. 1989. Proceedings of the symposium on fire and watershed management; October 26-28,1988; Sacramento, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW- 109. Berkeley, CA: Pacific South- westForest andRangeExgerimentStation, Forest Service,U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture; 164 p. The proceedings is a collection of papers presented at the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Mmagement-the second biennial conference of the Watershed Management Council-held in Sacramento, California,October 26-28,1988. Included are two luncheon addresses, seven papers on land use decisions and fire risk, eight papers on effects of fire on watersheds, eight pagers on resource recovery, and fifteen poster papers that offer perspectives from research, technology applications, and land and resource management. Retrieval Terms: fire management, resource recovery, resource rehabilita- tion, watershed management Authors took responsibility for preparing papers in camera-ready format. Views expressed in each paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsoring organizations. Trade names and commercial enterprises mentioned are solely for information and do not imply the endorsement of the sponsoring organizations. AD-83 Bookplate Publisher: ("a*) March W889 Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management October 26-28, 1988, Sacramento, California Neil H. Berg Technical Coordinator CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................... v Opening Remarks.................................................................................................................. vi Luncheon Addresses Timber Salvage Operations and Watershed Resource Values ............................................. 1 Paul F. Barker Current and Future Wildland Fire Protection Impacts of the Wildland-Urban Interface ...... 3 Harold R. Walt Technical Papers Land Use Decisions and Fire Risk ....................................................................................... 9 Wildfire in the Pacific West: A Brief History and Implications for the Future ................ 11 James K. Agee Use of Prescribed Fire to Reduce Wildfire Potential ....................................................... 17 Robert E. Martin, J. Boone Kauffman, and Joan D. Landsberg The Effects of Prescribed Burning on Fire Hazard in the Chaparral: Toward a New Conceptual Synthesis ............................................................................... 23 Anthony T. Dunn Cost-Effective Fire Management for Southern California's Chaparral Wilderness: An Analytical Procedure ................................................................................................. 30 Chris A. Childers and Douglas D. Piirto Demography: A Tool for Understanding the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Problem ..... 38 James B. Davis i Controlled Burns on the Urban Fringe, Mount Tamalpais, Marin County, California .... 43 Thomas E. Spittler Synthesis and Summary: Land Use Decisions and Fire Risk ......................................... 49 Theodore E. Adams, Jr. Effects of Fire on Watersheds .......................................................................................... 53 Effects of Fire on Chaparral Soils in Arizona and California and Postfire Management Implications .......................................................................... 55 Leonard F. DeBano Soil Hydraulic Characteristics of a Small Southwest Oregon Watershed Following High- Intensity Wildfire .......................................................................................................... 63 David S. Parks and Terrance W. Cundy Frequency of Floods from a Burned Chaparral Watershed.............................................. 68 Iraj Nasseri Application of SAC88 to Estimating Hydrologic Effects of Fire on a Watershed .......... 72 R. Larry Ferral Stream Shading, Summer Streamflow and Maximum Water Temperature Following Intense Wildfire in Headwater Streams ......................................................................... 75 Michael Amaranthus, Howard Jubas, and David Arthur Effects of Fire Retardant on Water Quality .................................................................... 79 Logan A. Norris and Warren L. Webb Maximizing Vegetation Response on Management Burns by Identifying Fire Regimes 87 V. Thomas Parker The Effects of Fire on Watersheds: A Summary ............................................................ 92 Nicholas Dennis Resource Recovery ........................................................................................................... 95 Emergency Bum Rehabilitation: Cost, Risk, and Effectiveness ..................................... 97 Scott R. Miles, Donald M. Haskins, and Darrel W. Ranken Emergency Watershed Protection Measures in Highly Unstable Terrain on the Blake Fire, Six Rivers National Forest, 1987................................................................ 103 Mark E. Smith and Kenneth A. Wright Emergency Watershed Treatments on Burned Lands in Southwestern Oregon ............ 109 Ed Gross, Ivars Steinblums, Curt Ralston, and Howard Jubas Wildfire, Ryegrass Seeding, and Watershed Rehabilitation ......................................... 115 RD. Taskey, CL. Curtis, and J. Stone Rationale for Seeding Grass on the Stanislaus Complex Burn ..................................... 125 Earl C. Ruby ii Watershed Response and Recovery from the Will Fire: Ten Years of Observation ...... 131 Kenneth B. Roby Compatibility of Timber Salvage Operations with Watershed Values .......................... 137 Roger J. Poff Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Wildfires: A Synthesis .................................. 141 Lee MacDonald Poster Papers .................................................................................................................... 145 Population Structure Analysis in the Context of Fire: A Preliminary Report ....................... 147 Jeremy John Ahouse Effect of Grass Seeding and Fertilizing on Surface Erosion in Two Intensely Burned Sites in Southwest Oregon .................................................................................................. 148 Michael P. Amaranthus Postfire Erosion and Vegetation Development in Chaparral as Influenced by Emergency Revegetation-A Study in Progress....................................................................................... 150 Susan G. Conard, Peter M. Wohlgemuth, Jane A. Kertis, Wade G. Wells II, and Susan C. Barro Chaparral Response to Burning: A Summer Wildfire Compared with Prescribed Burns ..... 151 Daniel O. Kelly, V. Thomas Parker, and Chris Rogers Fire Rehabilitation Techniques on Public Lands in Central California ............................... 152 John W. Key Distribution and Persistence of Hydrophobic Soil Layers on the Indian Burn ..................... 153 Roger J. Poff Fire Hazard Reduction, Watershed Restoration at the University of California, Berkeley ............................................................................................................................. 154 Carol L. Rice and Robert Charbonneau Soil Movement After Wildfire in Taiga (Discontinuous Permafrost) Upland Forest ........... 155 Charles W. Slaughter Fire and Archaeology ......................................................................................................... 156 Larry Swan and Charla Francis Modeling Fire and Timber Salvage Effects for the Silver Fire Recovery Project in Southwestern Oregon ......................................................................................................... 157 Jon Vanderheyden, Lee Johnson, Mike Amaranthus, and Linda Batten Maximizing Chaparral Vegetation Response to Prescribed Burns: Experimental Considerations .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan and Other Natural Disasters
    Laguna Beach Community Wildfire Protection Plan And Other Natural Disasters Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 1. Laguna Beach History......................................................................................................... 3 2. Covered Area ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. CWPP Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 II. CITY RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 3 1. Fire ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Floods ................................................................................................................................ 39 3. Tsunamis ........................................................................................................................... 41 4. Earthquakes ....................................................................................................................... 47 5. Evacuation Plan ................................................................................................................ 53 III. PUBLIC RESOURCES ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Fire Ecology July 1.Qxd
    Investigating Fire Ecology in Ponderosa Pine Forests 2004/First Edition A Field Guide for Sixth Grade Teachers This project was made possible by generous contributions of: Publishing Information This curriculum guide was created with funding from the NPS Fire Program and Challenge Cost Share Programs. Funding for implementation was provided by the NPS Parks As Classrooms program. All right s are not reserved. Materials in this guide may be reproduced by teachers for classroom use i.e., student handout s, transp arencies, etc. All right s are reserved for all other uses. The listing of a resource in this curriculum does not presume it s endorsement by the National Park Service. This guide may be obtained by p articip ating in a teacher workshop or by visiting the Bandelier website at www.nps.gov/band. Teachers are encouraged to offer their feedback by filling out the enclosed evaluation form or con - tacting the VTF or WPS directly. Printed on recycled p aper using soy-based inks. PREFACE hen the more than 18,000 residents of Los Alamos, New Mexico awoke W on May 6, 2000, they were unaware that within the next ninety-six hours their sleepy, relaxed mount ainside community would be forever changed. A small wildland fire approximately five miles southwest of town was rapidly growing. The fire was named for the peak of it s origin, Cerro Grande. As resident s uneasily watched the column of smoke rising from the thickly forested backdrop to town, over the next days firefighters battled the blaze with mixed success. On the morning of Wednesday, May 10th, represent atives of a wide range of government agencies, including New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, visited Los Alamos to assess the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Form 3805V
    2017 Instructions for Form FTB 3805V Net Operating Loss (NOL) Computation and NOL and Disaster Loss Limitations — Individuals, Estates, and Trusts References in these instructions are to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of January 1, 2015, and the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). General Information For NOLs incurred in taxable years beginning Nonbusiness capital losses and gains are on or after January 1, 2008, California has losses and gains from other than a trade or In general, for taxable years beginning on or extended the NOL carryover period from 10 business. These include sales of stock, metals, after January 1, 2015, California law conforms taxable years to 20 taxable years following the and other appreciable assets as well as any to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of year of the loss. recognized gain from the sale of your principal January 1, 2015. However, there are continuing For taxable years that began in 2002 and residence. differences between California and federal 2003, California suspended the NOL carryover Business losses: law. When California conforms to federal tax deduction. Taxpayers continued to compute You may deduct business capital losses only law changes, we do not always adopt all of and carryover an NOL during the suspension up to the total of business capital gains and the changes made at the federal level. For period. However, the deduction for disaster any nonbusiness capital gains that remain after more information, go to ftb.ca.gov and search losses was not affected by the NOL suspension deducting nonbusiness capital losses and other for conformity.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire
    GREATER FLAGSTAFF AREA COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN REVIEW & REVISION May 2012 1 PURPOSE In the summer of 2011, the Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership (GFFP) and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (PFAC) initiated a project to “review” the “Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Flagstaff and Surrounding Communities in tHe Coconino and Kaibab National Forests of Coconino County, Arizona” (CWPP). First approved in 2005, the CWPP review is designed to assess the status of implementation activities and evaluate progress towards desired goals. Although not required per the authorizing legislation (Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 - HFRA), nor by the CWPP itself, this was intended to analyze activity within the CWPP area that addressed goals or was influenced by the plan, and to develop a report for local government and land management agencies on findings - it was not designed to revise the text or intent of the CWPP. Primary emphasis was placed on summarizing treatment activity to date and reviewing the “Improved Protection Capabilities” section included on pages 40-43 of the Plan. INTRODUCTION The Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire Protection Plan was approved by the Arizona State Forester, Coconino County, City of Flagstaff, and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (representing local fire departments and fire districts) in January of 2005. Jointly developed by the GFFP and PFAC, the plan covered a 939,736-acre area centered on Flagstaff. Working closely with US Forest Service staff and the NAU Forest Ecosystem Restoration Analysis (Forest ERA) program, the CWPP was designed to address the following Goal, Objectives and Principles (quoted form the CWPP): GOAL To protect Flagstaff and surrounding communities, and associated values and infrastructure, from catastrophic wildfire by means of: a) An educated and involved public, b) Implementation of forest treatment projects designed to reduce wildfire threat and improve long term forest health, in a progressive and prioritized manner, and c) Utilization of FireWise building techniques and principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Bigcone Douglas-Fir Fire Scars and Tree Rings to Reconstruct Interior Chaparral Fire History
    Fire Ecology Vol. 5, No. 3, 2009 Lombardo et al.: Reconstructing Interior Chaparral Fire History doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0503035 Page 35 RESEARCH ARTICLE USING BIGCONE DOUGLAS-FIR FIRE SCARS AND TREE RINGS TO RECONSTRUCT INTERIOR CHAPARRAL FIRE HISTORY Keith J. Lombardo* 1, 2, Thomas W. Swetnam1, Christopher H. Baisan1, Mark I. Borchert3 1Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona, USA 2Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona, Harvill Building, Room 409, 1103 E. 2nd Street, Tucson, Arizona, USA 3San Bernardino National Forest, United States Forest Service, 602 S. Tippecanoe, San Bernardino, California, USA *Corresponding author: Tel: 001-520-621-5391; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Bigcone Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga macrocarpa [Vasey] Mayr) is a long-lived, fire-adapt- ed conifer that is endemic to the Transverse Ranges of southern California. At the lower and middle reaches of its elevational distribution, isolated stands of bigcone Douglas-fir are surrounded by extensive stands of chaparral. Our dendrochronology investigations have revealed that these ancient trees commonly record multiple past fires as fire scars in their lower boles. We hypothesized that the fire-scar record found within and among big- cone Douglas-fir stands reflects the temporal and spatial patterns of fire in the surrounding chaparral. We compared the fire scar results with independent, twentieth century fire atlas data to assess our interpretations. Using fire scars and ring-growth changes, we recon- structed fire history in Los Padres National Forest and investigated changes in fire regime characteristics over the past several centuries. Our analyses confirm that the tree-ring record can be used to accurately reconstruct past fire occurrence and extent patterns both within bigcone Douglas-fir stands and surround- ing chaparral stands.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Fires in San Diego County History
    Major fires in San Diego County history September 1913: Barona fire burned 65,470 acres. September 1928: Witch Creek fire near Santa Ysabel charred 33,240 acres. September 1928: Beauty Peak fire near the Riverside County border in the North County blackened 67,000 acres. October 1943: Hauser Creek fire in the Cleveland National Forest, at least 9 firefighters dead (including 7 marines), 72 injuries and 10,000 acres burned. August 1944: Laguna Junction fire burned 60,000 acres August 1950: Conejos Fire charred 64,000 acres. [Month unknown] 1952: Cuyamaca fire burned 64,000 acres November 1956: Inaja fire killed 11 firefighters and burned 43,904 acres near Julian. September 26-Oct. 3 1970: The Laguna fire, the county's largest fire in modern times, burned 175,425 acres, killed eight people and destroyed 382 homes. In 24 hours the fire burned from near Mount Laguna into the outskirts of El Cajon and Spring Valley. September 1978: PSA Crash in North Park June 1985: Normal Heights fire destroyed or damaged 116 houses, causing $8.6 million in damage. October 1993: Guejito fire east of Escondido charred 20,000 acres and destroyed 18 houses. Estimated $1.25 million damage. October 1996: Harmony Grove fire burned 8,600 acres, from Harmony Grove west of Escondido to La Costa, destroying nearly 110 homes and killing one man. August 1997: Lake Wohlford fire northeast of Escondido - an arson blaze - destroyed seven houses and burned 500 acres. October 1999: La Jolla Fire (La Jolla Indian Reservation) burned approximately 7,800 acres and 1 firefighter died.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Ecology of Ponderosa Pine and the Rebuilding of Fire-Resilient Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems 1
    Fire Ecology of Ponderosa Pine and the Rebuilding of Fire-Resilient Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems 1 Stephen A. Fitzgerald2 Abstract The ponderosa pine ecosystems of the West have change dramatically since Euro-American settlement 140 years ago due to past land uses and the curtailment of natural fire. Today, ponderosa pine forests contain over abundance of fuel, and stand densities have increased from a range of 49-124 trees ha-1 (20-50 trees acre-1) to a range of 1235-2470 trees ha-1 (500 to 1000 stems acre-1). As a result, long-term tree, stand, and landscape health has been compromised and stand and landscape conditions now promote large, uncharacteristic wildfires. Reversing this trend is paramount. Improving the fire-resiliency of ponderosa pine forests requires understanding the connection between fire behavior and severity and forest structure and fuels. Restoration treatments (thinning, prescribed fire, mowing and other mechanical treatments) that reduce surface, ladder, and crown fuels can reduce fire severity and the potential for high-intensity crown fires. Understanding the historical role of fire in shaping ponderosa pine ecosystems is important for designing restoration treatments. Without intelligent, ecosystem-based restoration treatments in the near term, forest health and wildfire conditions will continue to deteriorate in the long term and the situation is not likely to rectify itself. Introduction Historically, ponderosa pine ecosystems have had an intimate and inseparable relationship with fire. No other disturbance has had such a re-occurring influence on the development and maintenance of ponderosa pine ecosystems. Historically this relationship with fire varied somewhat across the range of ponderosa pine, and it varied temporally in concert with changes in climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume-1-San-Diego-Main-Report
    Folsom (Sacramento), CA Management Consultants Regional Fire Services Deployment Study for the CountyCounty ofof SanSan DiegoDiego OfficeOffice ofof EmergencyEmergency ServicesServices Volume 1 of 3 – Main Report May 5, 2010 2250 East Bidwell St., Ste #100 Folsom, CA 95630 (916) 458-5100 Fax: (916) 983-2090 This page was intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page VOLUME 1 of 3 – (this volume) PART ONE—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i. Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 1 Policy Choices Framework .................................................................... 2 Overall Attributes of the County of San Diego’s Fire Services............. 2 Accomplishments to Date ...................................................................... 3 Main Challenges..................................................................................... 3 Fire Plan Phasing.................................................................................. 17 ii. Comprehensive List of Findings and Recommendations ........................... 19 PART TWO—PROJECT BACKGROUND Section 1 Introduction and Background to the Regional Deployment Study .......................................................................................... 37 1.1 Project Approach and Research Methods.................................. 38 1.2 Report Organization................................................................... 38 1.3 Project Background...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan
    Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 MMU Strategic Fire Plan Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Section Date Numbers Description of Update Updated By Updated Updated 4/2020 Contents Page i-ii 2020 Update P4224 4/2020 Signature Page 1 Annual Update P4224 4/2020 Executive 2 Update C4200 Summary 4/2020 I Update P4224 4/2020 II None P4224 4/2020 III Update P4224 4/2020 IV Update B4220 4/2020 IV (B) Update F4208 3/2020 V Update All Battalions 4/2020 Appendix A Update P4224 4/2020 Appendix B None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-1 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-2 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix D None B4220 4/2020 Appendix E Update B4220 3/2020 Appendix F New P4224 4/2020 Appendix G Update B4211 3/2020 Appendix H None B4212 3/2020 Appendix I Update B4214 4/2020 Appendix J None B4215 4/2020 Appendix K None B16 4/2020 Appendix L None B17 3/2020 Appendix M Update B18 4/2020 Appendix N Update D4206 4/2020 Exhibits: Maps None GIS 4/2020 Accomplishments Update Various i Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 Table of Contents UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS ............................................................. i Table of Contents .............................................................................................................ii SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Declarations in California
    Disaster Declarations in California (BOLD=Major Disaster) (Wildfires are Highlighted) 2018 DR-4353 Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows, And Debris Flows Declared on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 - 06:00 FM-5244 Pawnee Fire Declared on Sunday, June 24, 2018 - 07:11 FM-5245 Creek Fire Declared on Monday, June 25, 2018 - 07:11 2017 DR-4301 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 13:15 EM-3381 Potential Failure of the Emergency Spillway at Lake Oroville Dam Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:20 DR-4302 Severe Winter Storm Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:30 DR-4305 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 04:48 DR-4308 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Mudslides Declared on Saturday, April 1, 2017 - 16:55 DR-4312 Flooding Declared on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 - 14:00 FM-5189 Wall Fire Declared on Sunday, July 9, 2017 - 14:18 FM-5192 Detwiler Fire Declared on Monday, July 17, 2017 - 19:23 DR-4344 Wildfires Declared on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 08:40 2016 FM-5124 Old Fire Declared on Saturday, June 4, 2016 - 21:55 FM-5128 Border 3 Fire Declared on Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:03 FM-5129 Fish Fire Declared on Monday, June 20, 2016 - 20:35 FM-5131 Erskine Fire Declared on Thursday, June 23, 2016 - 20:57 FM-5132 Sage Fire Declared on Saturday, July 9, 2016 - 18:15 FM-5135 Sand Fire Declared on Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 17:34 FM-5137 Soberanes Fire Declared on Thursday, July 28, 2016 - 16:38 FM-5140 Goose Fire Declared on Saturday, July 30, 2016 - 20:48
    [Show full text]
  • Using Bigcone Douglas-Fir Fire Scars and Tree Rings to Reconstruct Interior Chaparral Fire History
    Fire Ecology Vol. 5, No. 3, 2009 Lombardo et al.: Reconstructing Interior Chaparral Fire History doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0503035 Page 35 RESEARCH ARTICLE USING BIGCONE DOUGLAS-FIR FIRE SCARS AND TREE RINGS TO RECONSTRUCT INTERIOR CHAPARRAL FIRE HISTORY Keith J. Lombardo* 1, 2, Thomas W. Swetnam1, Christopher H. Baisan1, Mark I. Borchert3 1Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona, USA 2Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona, Harvill Building, Room 409, 1103 E. 2nd Street, Tucson, Arizona, USA 3San Bernardino National Forest, United States Forest Service, 602 S. Tippecanoe, San Bernardino, California, USA *Corresponding author: Tel: 001-520-621-5391; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Bigcone Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga macrocarpa [Vasey] Mayr) is a long-lived, fire-adapt- ed conifer that is endemic to the Transverse Ranges of southern California. At the lower and middle reaches of its elevational distribution, isolated stands of bigcone Douglas-fir are surrounded by extensive stands of chaparral. Our dendrochronology investigations have revealed that these ancient trees commonly record multiple past fires as fire scars in their lower boles. We hypothesized that the fire-scar record found within and among big- cone Douglas-fir stands reflects the temporal and spatial patterns of fire in the surrounding chaparral. We compared the fire scar results with independent, twentieth century fire atlas data to assess our interpretations. Using fire scars and ring-growth changes, we recon- structed fire history in Los Padres National Forest and investigated changes in fire regime characteristics over the past several centuries. Our analyses confirm that the tree-ring record can be used to accurately reconstruct past fire occurrence and extent patterns both within bigcone Douglas-fir stands and surround- ing chaparral stands.
    [Show full text]