DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 MMU Strategic Fire Plan Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Section Date Numbers Description of Update Updated By Updated Updated 4/2020 Contents Page i-ii 2020 Update P4224 4/2020 Signature Page 1 Annual Update P4224 4/2020 Executive 2 Update C4200 Summary 4/2020 I Update P4224 4/2020 II None P4224 4/2020 III Update P4224 4/2020 IV Update B4220 4/2020 IV (B) Update F4208 3/2020 V Update All Battalions 4/2020 Appendix A Update P4224 4/2020 Appendix B None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-1 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix C-2 None P4224 4/2020 Appendix D None B4220 4/2020 Appendix E Update B4220 3/2020 Appendix F New P4224 4/2020 Appendix G Update B4211 3/2020 Appendix H None B4212 3/2020 Appendix I Update B4214 4/2020 Appendix J None B4215 4/2020 Appendix K None B16 4/2020 Appendix L None B17 3/2020 Appendix M Update B18 4/2020 Appendix N Update D4206 4/2020 Exhibits: Maps None GIS 4/2020 Accomplishments Update Various i Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 Table of Contents UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS ............................................................. i Table of Contents .............................................................................................................ii SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 2 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................ 4 UNIT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ...................................... 6 SECTION II: COLLABORATION .................................................................................... 8 COMMUNITY / AGENCIES / FIRE SAFE COUNCILS .................................................... 8 SECTION III: VALUES .................................................................................................. 11 A: VALUES .................................................................................................................... 11 B: COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................................ 12 SECTION IV: PRE-FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ............................................. 13 A: FIRE PREVENTION ................................................................................................. 13 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY ........................................................... 14 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION............................................................................... 15 B. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 21 SECTION V: PRE- FIRE MANAGEMENT TACTICS ................................................... 26 DIVISION / BATTALION / PROGRAM PLANS ............................................................. 26 TRAINING BUREAU ..................................................................................................... 26 MOUNT BULLION CAMP CC#39 ................................................................................. 29 BATTALION 1: COULTERVILLE BATTALION .............................................................. 30 BATTALION 2: MARIPOSA BATTALION ...................................................................... 35 BATTALION 4: AWAHNEE BATTALION ...................................................................... 38 BATTALION 5: COARSEGOLD BATTALION ............................................................... 40 BATTALION 13: MADERA VALLEY BATTALION ......................................................... 42 ii Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 BATTALION 16: ATWATER BATTALION ..................................................................... 43 BATTALION 17: LOS BANOS BATTALION .................................................................. 45 BATTALION 18: MERCED BATTALION ....................................................................... 46 BATTALION 19: DELHI BATTALION ............................................................................ 48 APPENDIX A: PRE- FIRE PROJECTS ......................................................................... 50 APPENDIX B: UNIT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................... 52 APPENDIX C: HISTORY OF FIRE IN MMU ................................................................. 53 APPENDIX C-1: TELEGRAPH FIRE-2008 ................................................................... 60 APPENDIX C-2: DETWILER FIRE-2017 ....................................................................... 62 APPENDIX D: STRUCTURE DEFENSE/EVACUATION .............................................. 64 APPENDIX E: BATTALION 4220 .................................................................................. 65 APPENDIX F: FIRE PREVENTION ENGINEERING MASTER PLAN .......................... 67 APPENDIX G: BATTALION 1 PROJECTS ................................................................... 69 APPENDIX H: BATTALION 2 PROJECTS .................................................................... 74 APPENDIX I: BATTALION 4 PROJECTS ..................................................................... 79 APPENDIX J: BATTALION 5 PROJECTS .................................................................... 83 APPENDIX K: BATTALION 16 PROJECTS .................................................................. 86 APPENDIX L: BATTALION 17 PROJECTS .................................................................. 87 APPENDIX M: BATTALION 18 PROJECTS ................................................................. 87 APPENDIX N: MOUNT BULLION CAMP CC#39 PROJECTS ...................................... 88 EXHIBITS: MAPS .......................................................................................................... 91 SUPPLEMENT: 2020 .................................................................................................... 96 iii Madera-Mariposa-Merced Fire Plan 2020 SIGNATURE PAGE Unit Strategic Fire Plan developed for Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit: This Plan: • Was collaboratively developed. Interested parties, Federal, State, City, and County agencies within the Unit have been consulted and are listed in the plan. • Identifies and prioritizes pre-fire and post fire management strategies and tactics meant to reduce the loss of values at risk within the Unit. • Is intended for use as a planning and assessment tool only. It is the responsibility of those implementing the projects to ensure that all environmental compliance and permitting processes are met as necessary. _ _________ 5-7-2020______________ Unit Chief Date Mike van Loben Sels __________ 5-7-2020______________ Pre-Fire Engineer Date Chris Butler 1 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire Plan 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit has written its annual Fire Plan with the intention of establishing goals and priorities that align with CAL FIRE'S Strategic Plan and the California Fire Plan, while identifying goals and priorities specific to the Unit. The California Fire Plan is the road map for reducing the risk of wildfire. The Madera- Mariposa-Merced Unit's fire plan identifies strategic goals and objectives that target the anticipation and reduction of wildfire within the boundaries of the Unit. For the challenges facing the Unit with excessive tree fall rates due to bug kill and coming out of several years of drought, the Fire Plan will also serve the Unit in determining a plan to address our most dangerous areas and targets of risk within the overall Fire Plan. This fire plan seeks to improve operational effectiveness, scale to budgetary and fiscal circumstances, foster a healthy ecosystem and improve firefighter safety by identifying working projects specific to each Battalion within the Unit. Pre-fire management projects are designed to reduce cost and losses, especially during periods of severe weather. With the use of fire resistant landscaping, mechanical fuels treatment, prescribed fire projects, building construction standards, infrastructure, land use planning, pre-fire safety zones and escape plans, the Unit strives to keep what would otherwise be a large, catastrophic fire, to a smaller fire with less intensity, reducing suppression costs and property loss. The planning process defines a level of service measurement, considers assets at risk, incorporates the cooperative interdependent relationships of wildland fire protection providers, allows for public stakeholders’ involvement and creates a fiscal framework for policy analysis. The bark beetle epidemic has hit California’s wildland forests in the Coastal Ranges, Sierra Mountains and Foothill Communities, posing particular threat where dead trees are near homes and private property. In these areas, CAL FIRE has launched a public outreach campaign to educate and motivate residents to take steps now to protect their home and property from wildfire. More than 163 million trees have died in California since 2010, mostly pines in the Southern Sierra. In some communities, up to 85 percent of forest trees have died, and half of those have fallen, becoming dry fuel for wildfire 2 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Fire
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Fire Ecology July 1.Qxd
    Investigating Fire Ecology in Ponderosa Pine Forests 2004/First Edition A Field Guide for Sixth Grade Teachers This project was made possible by generous contributions of: Publishing Information This curriculum guide was created with funding from the NPS Fire Program and Challenge Cost Share Programs. Funding for implementation was provided by the NPS Parks As Classrooms program. All right s are not reserved. Materials in this guide may be reproduced by teachers for classroom use i.e., student handout s, transp arencies, etc. All right s are reserved for all other uses. The listing of a resource in this curriculum does not presume it s endorsement by the National Park Service. This guide may be obtained by p articip ating in a teacher workshop or by visiting the Bandelier website at www.nps.gov/band. Teachers are encouraged to offer their feedback by filling out the enclosed evaluation form or con - tacting the VTF or WPS directly. Printed on recycled p aper using soy-based inks. PREFACE hen the more than 18,000 residents of Los Alamos, New Mexico awoke W on May 6, 2000, they were unaware that within the next ninety-six hours their sleepy, relaxed mount ainside community would be forever changed. A small wildland fire approximately five miles southwest of town was rapidly growing. The fire was named for the peak of it s origin, Cerro Grande. As resident s uneasily watched the column of smoke rising from the thickly forested backdrop to town, over the next days firefighters battled the blaze with mixed success. On the morning of Wednesday, May 10th, represent atives of a wide range of government agencies, including New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, visited Los Alamos to assess the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferguson Fire Wreaks Havoc on Valley
    Ferguson Fire wreaks havoc on Valley air By Calley Cederlof Visalia Delta-Times, Wednesday, July 18, 2018 Central Valley residents woke to ashes on their cars Wednesday morning. It's a sign the smoke from the Ferguson Fire, burning near Yosemite National Park, has made its way into Tulare County. The high-pressure system over the West has kept smoke bottled up, limiting the use of firefighting aircraft and endangering people with health conditions. “Use common sense," Mariposa County officials said. "If it looks smoky outside it’s probably not a good time to go for a run. And it’s probably not a good time for your children to play outdoors." The blaze, which has grown to more than 17,000 acres, is being fed in large part by thousands of dead trees that were killed by a drought that has gripped California for several years. Due to the fire, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District issued a health cautionary for Tulare, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera and Fresno counties. Tulare County's air quality went from moderate to unhealthy for sensitive groups within a day. Like Yosemite visitors, travelers to Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks should also take precautions. On Wednesday, the air quality forecast was worse for the nearby national parks than in the Valley floor, according to air quality officials. “Our air quality isn’t any better,” said Sintia Kawasaki-Yee, spokeswoman for Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks. “Even if you can’t see it.” Air quality is tested through sensors placed at Lodgepole Campground every day at the parks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Form 3805V
    2017 Instructions for Form FTB 3805V Net Operating Loss (NOL) Computation and NOL and Disaster Loss Limitations — Individuals, Estates, and Trusts References in these instructions are to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of January 1, 2015, and the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). General Information For NOLs incurred in taxable years beginning Nonbusiness capital losses and gains are on or after January 1, 2008, California has losses and gains from other than a trade or In general, for taxable years beginning on or extended the NOL carryover period from 10 business. These include sales of stock, metals, after January 1, 2015, California law conforms taxable years to 20 taxable years following the and other appreciable assets as well as any to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of year of the loss. recognized gain from the sale of your principal January 1, 2015. However, there are continuing For taxable years that began in 2002 and residence. differences between California and federal 2003, California suspended the NOL carryover Business losses: law. When California conforms to federal tax deduction. Taxpayers continued to compute You may deduct business capital losses only law changes, we do not always adopt all of and carryover an NOL during the suspension up to the total of business capital gains and the changes made at the federal level. For period. However, the deduction for disaster any nonbusiness capital gains that remain after more information, go to ftb.ca.gov and search losses was not affected by the NOL suspension deducting nonbusiness capital losses and other for conformity.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire
    GREATER FLAGSTAFF AREA COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN REVIEW & REVISION May 2012 1 PURPOSE In the summer of 2011, the Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership (GFFP) and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (PFAC) initiated a project to “review” the “Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Flagstaff and Surrounding Communities in tHe Coconino and Kaibab National Forests of Coconino County, Arizona” (CWPP). First approved in 2005, the CWPP review is designed to assess the status of implementation activities and evaluate progress towards desired goals. Although not required per the authorizing legislation (Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 - HFRA), nor by the CWPP itself, this was intended to analyze activity within the CWPP area that addressed goals or was influenced by the plan, and to develop a report for local government and land management agencies on findings - it was not designed to revise the text or intent of the CWPP. Primary emphasis was placed on summarizing treatment activity to date and reviewing the “Improved Protection Capabilities” section included on pages 40-43 of the Plan. INTRODUCTION The Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire Protection Plan was approved by the Arizona State Forester, Coconino County, City of Flagstaff, and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (representing local fire departments and fire districts) in January of 2005. Jointly developed by the GFFP and PFAC, the plan covered a 939,736-acre area centered on Flagstaff. Working closely with US Forest Service staff and the NAU Forest Ecosystem Restoration Analysis (Forest ERA) program, the CWPP was designed to address the following Goal, Objectives and Principles (quoted form the CWPP): GOAL To protect Flagstaff and surrounding communities, and associated values and infrastructure, from catastrophic wildfire by means of: a) An educated and involved public, b) Implementation of forest treatment projects designed to reduce wildfire threat and improve long term forest health, in a progressive and prioritized manner, and c) Utilization of FireWise building techniques and principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Fireboats and Search and Rescue Boats with a Small Firegigting
    The United States has a long history of fire departments using surplus property from other government agencies , re purposing property within departments, and sometimes other agencies reusing obsolete fire apparatus. Fireboats and Search and Rescue Boats have been converted from military and other government agencies surplus since the end of World War I. It is unlikely there will be any future conversions of large high gallon per minute capacity, 5,000 gpm or more, fireboats from surplus craft . It is possible that some of the tractor tugs built for the U.S. Navy with substantial fire fighting features and capability included could be made available through the Federal Government surplus property transfer programs in a few decades. Large fireboats have since the 1970s been built using features from tugboats, but have many special design features to deal with hazardous materials etc. Search and Rescue and small fireboats of no more the 2,000 or so gallons per minute are still sometimes converted from surplus craft obtained from other government agencies. In 1921, the Baltimore City Fire Department received, by loan from the U.S. Navy, the 110 foot long anti-submarine warfare vessel SC 428 . Ship was built between 1917-and 1919 . Boat was loaned for the purpose of conversion into a fireboat. The ship, renamed Cascade in 1949, served the fire department until 1960. The city received titled to the ship in 1949 through legislation passed by the House and Senate and signed by President Truman. The U.S. Army built several 98 foot tugboat type workboats ,in the early 20th century, to assist with maintaining coastal defense minefields.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 611 Fire Behavior Ppt Instructor Notes
    The Connecticut Fire Academy Unit 6.1 Recruit Firefighter Program Chapter 6 Presentation Instructor Notes Fire Behavior Slide 1 Recruit Firefighter Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program 1 Slide 2 © Darin Echelberger/ShutterStock, Inc. CHAPTER 6 Fire Behavior Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program Slide 3 Some have said that fires in modern furnished Fires Are Not Unpredictable! homes are unpredictable • A thorough knowledge of fire behavior will help you predict fireground events Nothing is unpredictable, firefighters just need to know what clues to look for Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program Slide 4 Connecticut Fire Academy Recruit Program CHEMISTRY OF COMBUSTION Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program 1 of 26 Revision: 011414 The Connecticut Fire Academy Unit 6.1 Recruit Firefighter Program Chapter 6 Presentation Instructor Notes Fire Behavior Slide 5 A basic understanding of how fire burns will give a Chemistry firefighter the ability to choose the best means of • Understanding the • Fire behavior is one of chemistry of fire will the largest extinguishment make you more considerations when effective choosing tactics Fire behavior and building construction are the basis for all of our actions on the fire ground Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program Slide 6 What is Fire? • A rapid chemical reaction that produces heat and light Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program Slide 7 Types of Reactions Exothermic Endothermic • Gives off heat • Absorbs heat Connecticut Fire Academy – Recruit Program Slide 8 Non-flaming
    [Show full text]
  • 4 12 19 Final Board Packet.Pdf
    SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS District Office, 18966 Ferretti Road Groveland, CA 95321 (209) 962-7161 www.gcsd.org AGENDA April 12, 2019 10:00 a.m. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call of Board Members Janice Kwiatkowski, President Nancy Mora, Vice President John Armstrong, Director Spencer Edwards, Director Robert Swan, Director 1. Approve Order of Agenda 2. Public Comment Members of the public are appreciated for taking the time to attend this meeting and provide comments on matters of District business. Public comments are subject to a 3- minute time limit; 10 minutes on an individual topic. Although no action can be taken on items not listed on the agenda, please know we are listening carefully to your comments. 3. Information Items Brief reports may be provided by District staff and/or Board members as information on matters of general interest. No action will be taken by the Board during Reports, however items discussed may be recommended for discussion and action on a future agenda. Public comments will be taken after each report is provided. A. Staff Reports i. Fire Department Report ii. General Manager’s Report iii. Operations Manager’s Report iv. Administrative Services Manager’s Report B. President’s Report i. Fire Services Evaluation and Funding 4. Consent Calendar Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a member of the Board, Staff or a member of the Public requests specific items be set aside for separate discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fire Commission Recommendation 20-01
    COLORADO FIRE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20-01 Implement the Colorado Coordinated Regional Mutual Aid System (CCRMAS) Statutory Duties: Per 24-33.5-1233(4)(b)(VI) The Commission will strengthen regional and statewide coordination of mutual aid resources and initial attack capabilities for fires and other hazards. Assumptions: 1. Rapidly expanding incidents can overwhelm the resources of the local fire department and surrounding agencies. 2. Local mutual aid plans exist but there is limited coordination across regions to activate additional resources quickly during rapidly expanding incidents. 3. Decreasing activation time can help minimize the impacts of an incident. 4. During the initial stages of an incident, dispatch centers, and local first responders will be focused on their primary response duties and unable to assist with coordinating rapid mutual aid mobilization. Emergency managers and emergency operations centers will be in the process of being stood up in support of extended response should it become necessary and in preparation for consequence management of subsequent impacts of the emergency response. 5. The statewide coordinated regional mutual aid system covers the time between the start of an incident and when adequate resources arrive for prolonged response through interagency systems and/or local and state Emergency Operations Centers. 6. The goal is to develop a unified approach to mobilizing fire and EMS resources, eliminate redundancy, and eliminate duplicate orders with the end goal of integration into the state response system. 7. A statewide coordinated regional mutual aid system, with dedicated resources for implementation, will help with the coordination and movement of mutual aid resources without impacting local dispatch centers which are busy managing 911 calls and resource response.
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Accident Investigation
    Serious Accident Investigation: Factual Report and Analysis Fatality of NPS Arrowhead Interagency Hotshot Crew Captain Brian Hughes The Ferguson Fire on the Sierra National Forest, CA, July 29, 2018 Page Intentionally Blank 1 In Memory of Brian Hughes August 1, 1984 – July 29, 2018 Captain Hughes is in the back row, left. The surviving members of the Arrowhead Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC) have expressed sincere admiration for their fallen friend and leader. “Fortitude Vincimus” By Endurance We Conquer Arrowhead IHC motto 2 Serious Accident Investigation: Factual Report Accident: Tree Strike of National Park Service (NPS) Arrowhead Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC) Captain Brian Hughes Location: Ferguson Fire, Division-G, Sierra National Forest, near Yosemite West Date: July 29, 2018 Investigation Team Team Leader: Jim Loach Title: Associate Regional Director, NPS, Midwest Region, Omaha, NE Signature/ Date Deputy Team Leader: Randy Draeger Title: Regional Director of Safety, USFS, Ogden, UT Signature/ Date Chief Investigator: Don Boucher Title: Regional Structural Fire Manager, NPS, Midwest Region, Omaha, NE Chief Investigator [Shadow]: Jeremy Murphy Title: Regional Chief Ranger, NPS, National Capital Region, Washington, D.C. Investigator: Lindel Gregory Title: Chief Ranger, NPS, Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Van Buren, MO 3 Investigator: Nick Armitage Title: Ranger, NPS, Grand Teton National Park, Moose, WY Investigator: Patrick Pearson Title: Chief of Fire and Aviation, NPS, Midwest Region, Omaha, NE Subject Matter Expert – Hotshot:
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium Program Proceedings
    Department of Geography Spring 2019 Colloquium May 8th, 2019 7:00 PM – 9:45 PM Program Poster Session – 7:00PM – 9:45PM (Peterson Hall 2nd Floor) Social Vulnerability in Communities Affected by the Thomas Fire Disaster by Lluvia Lastra, Lilian Yang, Segnide Guidimadjegbe, and Andrew Siwabessy The burden of hazard prevention and of loss in communities on the wildland-urban interface (WUI) is often unequally shouldered along socioeconomic lines. The changing nature of social vulnerability in these communities, in light of the dynamic fire regime, is not well studied in the context of southern California. In this study this shift is characterized by analyzing the 2017-2018 Thomas Fire and subsequent debris flow events using a mixed methodology approach. Maps of structural damage are created using Cal Fire parcel-level damage data in a geographical information system (GIS). Demographic data is reduced from Census block group information using principal component analysis (PCA) and is re- represented as a social vulnerability index (SoVI) after Cutter (2003). To identify socially vulnerable groups that are not obvious from Census data, we utilized a content analysis of newspaper articles published by the Santa Barbara Independent to further inform the geospatial analysis. Although the spatial analysis did not identify an explicit correlation between our SoVI and damage extent, qualitative enrichment offered explanations for damage extent outlier block groups and identified vulnerable groups that were missed by the spatial analysis. A Spark of Life: California Coastal sage scrub regeneration post-Woolsey Fire by Derek Emmons Despite California coastal sage scrub (CSS)’s resilience to millennia of human interactions, losing 90% of its historic range to development has left the remaining islands of biodiversity sensitive to variations in disturbance (Engelberg et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire May 2020 CAL FIRE/Riverside Unit Strategic Fire Plan Page 1 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE .........................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................4 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................6 UNIT PREPAREDNESSAND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ............................... 12 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM .................................................................................................................... 14 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF VALUES AT RISK ............................................................ 17 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ................................................................................. 22 SECTION IV: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ........................................................................................ 24 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY................................................... 27 INFORMATIONANDEDUCATION ................................................................... 28 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 29 SECTION V: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT TACTICS DIVISION / BATTALION / PROGRAM PLANS .................................................. 41 APPENDIX A: HIGH PRIORITY PRE‐FIRE PROJECTS .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Year End Report
    Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center www.wildfirelessons.net 2020 Year End Report This brief report summarizes the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center’s important updates and achievements that occurred in 2020. ln May 2020, we welcomed Kelly Woods as the new Director of the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center (LLC). “This is the coolest of opportunities,” Kelly said. “I am honored to be joining the amazing folks at the LLC.” Kelly comes to the LLC most directly from the Bureau of Land Management where she spent the last eight years as the Great Basin Training Center Manager. Kelly’s career—which spans nearly 30 years—includes positions on the Mount Hood, Ochoco, Payette, and Boise national forests; the Pacific Region of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and the Forest Service’s Washington Office. Kelly’s work experience ranges from positions on type 2 crews and hotshot crews to serving as an engine captain and heli-rappeller. She has also worked in fire prevention and mitigation, as well as fire training development and delivery. In addition, Kelly served as lead public information officer on a type 2 incident management team. “With me joining the team and the LLC’s 20-year anniversary coming up, it’s a good time to reflect on what the next iteration of the LLC should prioritize,” Kelly informs. “Our staff is engaged in strategic conversations about our most effective tools and methods for sharing the lessons and what new innovations we should be considering.” Kelly is the third person to fill the director position since the LLC was established in 2002.
    [Show full text]