DOCSLIB.ORG

Buckinghamshire Minerals & Waste Local Plan 2004-2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buckinghamshire Minerals & Waste Local Plan 2004-2016 Buckinghamshire Minerals & Waste Local Plan 2004 -2016 June 2006 Foreword The County Council has been preparing local plans to control and guide minerals and waste development in Buckinghamshire for some twenty years. This Plan - the Buckinghamshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan - was adopted by the Council in April 2006, and is the latest product in a long and continuous line of local planning activity. This Plan represents the culmination of a long programme of work which commenced in May 2002. During the four years since then, the County Council received a great many comments and suggestions about what it should contain, and how our emerging ideas could be improved, from a wide variety of sources. These ranged from operators and industry bodies, Government departments and agencies, local authorities both within and outside Buckinghamshire; Parish Councils; environmental and amenity bodies; voluntary societies; residents' groups; and large numbers of local people. To all those who contributed comments and advice as the Plan progressed towards adoption, I would like to express the Council's grateful thanks. Buckinghamshire is not an island, however, and we have also had to take full account of new and evolving Government guidance for more sustainable waste management and minerals production. In addition, the Council has worked closely with the Regional Assembly on relevant emerging regional strategies and has had some influence upon their nature. These, in turn, form a framework for some of the important policies and proposals contained in the Plan, not least the appropriate provision to be made for future sand and gravel working and targets for waste recycling. To summarise, the aims of the Plan to 2016 are for: • Reducing demand upon natural resources • Less pollution risk and greenhouse gas emissions • Less use of primary, land-won minerals and more of recycled material • Higher standards of site restoration • A slowing down in the rate of waste generation • Less landfill, more recycling and composting • Wastes managed at the most appropriate level • Less movement of waste There is, especially with future waste management, considerable uncertainty as to the nature and location of future technologies that will be necessary to recover value or energy from waste. We have planned for reduced reliance upon landfill, and in the earlier years of the plan we are seeking to maximise the contribution of recycling and composting. But in later years these measures will be insufficient to meet national and regional targets and the use of higher waste recovery technologies will become necessary. The Plan therefore provides a policy context that covers a range of future possibilities. Finally, notwithstanding Government changes in 2004 to the planning system, the County Council remains responsible for local minerals and waste planning (and the control of such development after this takes place). It is important to note that this Plan will have a fundamental role in providing a framework to guide the preparation of the Council's new "Development Plan Documents" which will identify locations for the future waste and minerals development that will be needed in Buckinghamshire to 2021. I would encourage all stakeholders and consultees who have contributed to this Plan to remain engaged in forthcoming consultations as we develop these Documents. As Cabinet member, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Strategic Planning staff for the quality of their contribution. The people of Buckinghamshire can be confident that it is of the highest order, both in relation to this present Minerals & Waste Local Plan and also in their work over the whole range of Strategic Planning activities at the County Council. Rodney Royston Cabinet Member for Strategic Planning Contents Section Page Section Page Chapter 1 Introduction Policy 15: Waste Transfer 1.1 General 3 3.6 31 Facilities Policy 16: Anaerobic and The Duty to Plan for Mineral 1.2 3.7 Mechanical – Biological 32 Extraction & Waste Management 3 Treatment Plant Policy 17: Energy from Waste 1.3 Overriding Aims 3 3.8 33 Plant Policy 18: Landfill and 1.4 Context 4 3.9 35 Landraising 1.5 The Need for Review 4 3.10 Policy 19: Calvert Landfill Site 36 Policy 20: Landfill Gas Collection 1.6 Scope and Content 5 3.11 37 & Energy Recovery 1.7 How to Use This Plan 5 3.12 Policy 21: Hazardous Wastes 38 Policy 22: Inert Wastes and Inert Chapter 2 Minerals 3.13 39 Waste Recycling Policy 23: Sewage Treatment Policy 1: Overarching Minerals 2.1 8 3.14 Works & Management of Sewage 40 Extraction Principles Sludge General Environmental 2.2 Policy 2: Aggregates Landbank 9 Chapter 4 Policies Policy 3: Preferred Areas for Policy 24: Protection of Key 2.3 11 4.1 42 Sand and Gravel Extraction Environmental Assets Policy 25: Protection of Other 2.4 Policy 4: Area of Search 12 4.2 Environmentally Important Sites 43 & Features Policy 5: Borrow Pits & Other Policy 26: Protection of 2.5 13 4.3 44 Windfall Sites Agricultural Land Policy 6: Alternative Aggregates Policy 27: Protection of 2.6 14 4.4 45 Production The Green Belt Policy 7: The Transport of 2.7 16 4.5 Policy 28: Amenity 46 Aggregates 2.8 Policy 8: Other Minerals 17 4.6 Policy 29: Buffer Zones 47 Policy 30: Proximity Principle and 2.9 Policy 9: Oil Exploration 17 4.7 48 Sustainable Transport Policy 31: Restoration and Chapter 3 Waste 4.8 49 Aftercare Policy 10: Overarching Waste 3.1 20 4.9 Policy 32:Restoration of Old Sites 50 Management Principles Policy 11: Imported Wastes and Policy 33: Groundwater and 3.2 25 4.10 51 Landfill Sites Floodplain Protection Policy 12: Integrated Waste Policy 34: Aviation Safeguard 3.3 27 4.11 52 Management Areas Policy 13: Recycling Composting 3.4 28 Facilities Policy 14: Household Waste 3.5 29 Recycling Centres (HWRCs) 1 Section Page Section Page Chapter 5 Development Control Policies Maps Policy 35: Best Practicable 5.1 53 1 Proposals Map and Inset Areas 7 Environmental Option Proposals Map – Inset Area A Policy 36: Planning Application 5.2 54 2 and Mineral Consultation Area Issues (sleeve) Policy 37: Environmental 5.3 56 3 Proposals Map – Inset Area B 19 Assessment 5.4 Policy 38: Planning Obligations 57 4 Survey Map (sleeve) Policy 39: Site Monitoring and Landfilling and Land Raising 5.5 58 5 Enforcement Sites (sleeve) Waste Management Facilities Chapter 6 Monitoring 6 (Sleeve) 6.1 Policy 40: Plan Monitoring 60 Tables Preferred Areas, Waste Transfer Appendices Reserves Workable During the Site and Household Waste And 61 1 10 A Plan Period Recycling Centre List of Main Guidance and B Legislation informing the 81 2 Frequency of Site Visits Per Year 58 preparation of this Plan C Glossary 83 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 General 1.1.1This plan provides a land use policy framework to 2016 for mineral and waste planning within Buckinghamshire. It is the first combined Buckinghamshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan (BM&WLP) produced by the County Council and replaces the existing Minerals Local Plan (MLP) and Waste Local Plan (WLP). The area covered by this Plan is shown on Map 1. 1.1.2 Notwithstanding the major changes to the planning system introduced under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, transitional arrangements allow this plan to progress to adoption as a local plan under existing procedures. The BM&WLP will then be a "saved plan" for a period of three years from adoption (programmed for May 2006). Following adoption of this plan the Council will proceed directly to the preparation of the new Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (MWDPDs) as required by the Act. However the content of this plan will form the cornerstone of the successor MWDPDs and so consultees are reassured that the BM&WLP, and their engagement with it, will be of lasting value. 1.2 The Duty to Plan for Mineral Extraction and Waste Management 1.2.1 As the statutory Minerals Planning Authority (MPA) and Waste Disposal Authority (WDA), the 1 County Council is legally responsible for the control of mineral extraction and waste management within the plan area. It is guided in the operation of these powers by national, regional, Structure, and 2 Local Plan policies. In addition, the County Council must prepare a Minerals Local Plan (MLP), a Waste Local Plan (WLP), or a combined Minerals and Waste Local Plan (M&WLP), to set out detailed policies and proposals for mineral extraction and restoration and waste management. 1.2.2 The County Council believes that MLPs and WLPs are essential for the efficient implementation of minerals and waste development control. It takes the view that the interests of the minerals and waste industries and the public can best be served by the framework of sustainable policies and proposals contained in an approved and up-to-date M&WLP. 1.3 Overriding Aims 1.3.1 The aims of this Plan are: 3 4 a) to comply with Government guidance and Structure Plan policy to secure an acceptable and sustainable balance between society’s need for minerals and the need to manage waste whilst conserving resources and protecting the environment; b) to give greater certainty as to the location and scale of future mineral working and waste management facilities and to provide a clear guide to mineral and waste operators and to the public where mineral extraction and waste facilities are likely in principle to be acceptable and where not acceptable 5; 1 Under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 and the Environment Act 1995, and as a statutory Minerals Planning Authority (MPA) and Waste Planning Authority (WPA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VALP Modelling
    VALP Modelling BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report TN02 | 2 30/05/19 BCC NE B ucks Loc al Plan T ests -Tec hnical Report BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report VALP Modelling Project No: BRJ10150 Document Title: NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Document No.: TN02 Revision: 2 Date: 30/05/19 Client Name: BCC Client No: BCC Project Manager: Mily Parveen Author: Catherine Hill File Name: M:\Transport Modelling\BRJ10150 VALP Model Runs\Technical Work\Reports\Countywide modelling report\Countywide Modelling Report- VALP 290519.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited NONE www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 28/02/19 Draft CH TW MP 1 09/04/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP 2 30/05/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP TN02 1 NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Scope of study ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 Aylesbury Podcast (Completed 07/29/19) Page 1 of 7
    John Stranks: 00:00 We used to have an identity. The identity is diminishing. Ranjula Takodra: 00:06 We've got people coming from London settling here. It's become like a commuter town. Bryan Barnes: 00:12 It's lost its character. We've got a mishmash of modern buildings. There's no coherence to it. John Stranks: 00:18 You can see the old Aylesbury is still there, but there's so very, very little of it now. Bryan Barnes: 00:24 When we moved out here we thought we'd be on the edge of town, but we're now gradually getting into part of the middle again. Ranjula Takodra: 00:30 I just love Aylesbury. This is my home. This is where I've seen everything happening. Ray Ghent: 00:36 Once upon a time I would have to had said that this town is the best place to work, shop, and play. But I'm a former councillor of this town. I mean I liked Aylesbury as it was 35 years ago. When it grows and grows it can get out of hand and it doesn't then look or feel as it did then. It was quiet for a market town. It did have its own market, cattle market, sheep market, which sadly has all disappeared. And of course over all those years, the town has extended and grown, as a lot of smaller towns in the country have had to do so. Mike Farley: 01:16 It's a place which is commuter land, of course, and many people do go outside Aylesbury to seek their entertainments and to do their shopping, and it's difficult to find all- HS2 Aylesbury podcast (Completed 07/29/19) Page 1 of 7 embracing community groups, but it's quite new.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale Parkway to Aylesbury (Full Walk) Aylesbury Vale Parkway to Aylesbury (Short Walk)
    Aylesbury Vale Parkway to Aylesbury (Full Walk) Aylesbury Vale Parkway to Aylesbury (Short Walk) 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 11th August 2013 2nd October 2016 8th July 2021 22nd Febr. 2015 Current status Document last updated Friday, 09th July 2021 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: • The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. • Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. • This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. • All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2013-2021, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Aylesbury Vale Parkway to Aylesbury Start: Aylesbury Vale Parkway Station Finish: Aylesbury Station Aylesbury Vale Parkway station, map reference SP 786 153, is 3.6 km northwest of Aylesbury and 75m above sea level. Aylesbury Station, map reference SP 817 134, is 76m above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Openness & Accountability Mailing List
    Openness & Accountability Mailing List AINA Amateur Rowing Association Anglers Conservation Association APCO Association of Waterway Cruising Clubs British Boating Federation British Canoe Union British Marine Federation Canal & Boat Builder’s Association CCPR Commercial Boat Operators Association Community Boats Association Country Landowners Association Cyclist’s Touring Club Historic Narrow Boat Owners Club Inland Waterways Association IWAAC Local Government Association NAHFAC National Association of Boat Owners National Community Boats Association National Federation of Anglers Parliamentary Waterways Group Rambler’s Association The Yacht Harbour Association Residential Boat Owner’s Association Royal Yachting Association Southern Canals Association Steam Boat Association Thames Boating Trades Association Thames Traditional Boat Society The Barge Association Upper Avon Navigation Trust Wooden Canal Boat Society ABSE AINA Amber Valley Borough Council Ash Tree Boat Club Ashby Canal Association Ashby Canal Trust Association of Canal Enterprises Aylesbury Canal Society 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council B&MK Trust Barnsley, Dearne & & Dover Canal Trust Barnet Borough Council Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Bassetlaw District Council Bath North East Somerset Council Bedford & Milton Keynes Waterway Trust Bedford Rivers Users Group Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Boat Museum Society Chair Bolton Metropolitan Council Borough of Milton Keynes Brent Council Bridge 19-40
    [Show full text]
  • AVDC Annual Monitoring Report 2005
    Aylesbury Vale Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 November 2008 ‘YOU ARE HERE’ - A MAP OF THE LDF, WITH THIS DOCUMENT HIGHLIGHTED - Annual Core Strategy Local Statement of Monitoring Development Community Report Scheme Involvement (AMR) (LDS) (SCI) Allocated Sites Local Development Framework General Policies (LDF) Supplementary Supplementary Proposals Map Planning Planning Document Document (SPD) (SPD) KEY Local Development Framework (LDF) The collective term for all the documents listed above. Development Plan Documents (DPDs) Documents containing planning policy; formally part of the development plan for Aylesbury Vale once adopted. ‘Administrative’ Documents Documents involved in the administration of the LDF: • LDS: the work programme for the LDF • SCI: how we will involve the community in planning matters • AMR: monitoring the effectiveness of the LDF Supplementary Planning Documents Provide additional detail on policies in a DPD. This document is the AMR The AMR monitors the effectiveness of planning policies, and also progress made against the work programme set out in the Local Development Scheme. NB The ‘saved’ policies in AVDLP remain part of the development plan for Aylesbury Vale until explicitly superseded by LDF policies; the policies in force will be made clear in all DPDs. CONTENTS PAGE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 5 3 PROGRESS WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LOCAL 8 DEVELOPMENT SCHEME 4 OVERVIEW OF AYLESBURY VALE DISTRICT 13 5 HOUSING 15 6 EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMY 44 7 AYLESBURY TOWN CENTRE 65
    [Show full text]
  • PARISH PROFILE the Parish of St
    PARISH PROFILE The Parish of St. Margaret’s Iver Heath in the Archdeaconry of Buckingham, Diocese of Oxford, is vacant following the appointment of the Reverend William Hazlewood as the Vicar of the United Benefice of Dartmouth and Dittisham in August 2011. Location and amenities Iver Heath is a village of 5,000 people within a green belt conservation zone of South Buckinghamshire. Until the 19 th century it was an area of heath land, which was crossed by the roads from Denham and Uxbridge leading towards Upton and Burnham and the site of modern Slough. After St. Margaret's Church was built in 1862, housing development followed in the village. This process has continued ever since. The best known feature of Iver Heath is the world famous Pinewood Studios, situated next to Black Park Country Park. This park and the neighbouring Langley Park are major amenities for the area. Many of the houses built before the Second World War were for the employees of Pinewood Studios. Some local people continue to work there as well as in Slough and West London, such as at Heathrow Airport. Iver Heath is within easy access of the M4, M25 and M40 motorways and the railway system. From Iver station, in the neighbouring parish, London (Paddington) can be reached in approximately 25 minutes and there is access to Wales and the West of England via Slough. Denham is on the Chiltern line from Birmingham to London. Uxbridge is served by the London Underground trains on the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines. There is also a local bus service into Slough and Uxbridge which both have large shopping centres and entertainment facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Rivers District Council Level 2 SFRA Detailed Site Summary Tables
    Three Rivers District Council Level 2 SFRA Detailed Site Summary Tables Table of Contents ACFS8b ................................................................................................................................................ 3 CFS12 ................................................................................................................................................... 6 CFS16 ................................................................................................................................................. 11 CFS18 ................................................................................................................................................. 15 CFS20 ................................................................................................................................................. 19 CFS24 ................................................................................................................................................. 23 CFS26A .............................................................................................................................................. 27 CFS32 ................................................................................................................................................. 31 CFS33 ................................................................................................................................................. 35 CFS38A .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Professional
    February 2018 ciht.org.uk transportation professional Former colleagues reflect on Orbital interchange scheme bridge building bus patronage warm mix asphalt managing traffic Is Boris Johnson’s New study to Sustainability set Belgian city cuts Channel crossing explore reasons to be promoted out the cars plan a good idea? for declining use with specification from central area p4 p7 p20 p24 Visit CIHT’s official jobs website:cihtjobs.com @CIHTUK #CIHTconf CIHT Annual Conference 2018 Highways: Change, innovation and the future Thursday 8 March Park Plaza Victoria London SW1V 1EQ A DYNAMIC INTERACTIVE CONFERENCE The conference will explore how the Highways sector is changing and how innovation will drive continuous change Live presentations Interviews with infl uential industry leaders Informative break-out sessions Build your knowledge and skills, network with peers and contribute to your CPD Leading speakers and panel members addressing the conference include: ■ Roy Brannen, chief executive, Transport Scotland, who is the subject of the conference’s main interview and will off er a global perspective of the sector ■ Elliot Shaw, executive director of strategy and planning, Highways England, who will explain its approach to the next investment period on the strategic road network ■ Dave Wright, executive director for highways at Kier will share his experience from the company’s perspective as a leading Gold Corporate Partner ■ Dana Skelley OBE, director of strategy and operational excellence at Skanska Civil Engineering will draw on her experience
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Northern Extension of Northolt Tunnel SIFT Report
    C222-ATK-DS-REP-020-000034 |P06 | 27 Feb 2015 Proposal for Northern Extension of Northolt Tunnel SIFT Report Revision Date Issued for/Revision details Revised by P01 13.06.2014 Issued for review HSF Review and update to include P02 30.01.2015 SS HS2 comments Updated to include comments P03 24.02.2015 AR and Rail Systems info P04 26.02.2015 Updated following review AR P05 27.02.2015 Updated for final review AR P06 02.03.2015 Final AR Name Data FOI / EIR None Document type Report Directorate London West Midlands WBS B320 & PE.06.57 Keywords Colne Valley Viaduct, Northolt Tunnel, River Colne Authors H S Farrant Checker Roger Weber Accepted Approver Andy Robson - Owner C222 Atkins 1 Review Directorate LWM TD Employer’s Lead Reviewer Neil Cowie Authorised for use `Code Uncontrolled when printed INTERNAL INFORMATION Northern Extension of Northolt Tunnel SIFT Report London West Midlands Northolt Tunnel Extension - SIFT Report Contents Page number 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 6 3. Scope of the Sift ......................................................................................................... 8 4. Assumptions .............................................................................................................. 9 4.1 General .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Assessment
    HIGH SPEED RAIL(LONDON WEST- MIDLANDS) | SES3 and AP4 ES SES3 AP4 and HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST | Volume 5 | Technical appendices | Transport Assessment | Transport appendices 5 | Technical Volume MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 3 and Additional Provision 4 Environmental Statement Volume 5 | Technical appendices Transport Assessment (TR-001-000) High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square Revised version issued 30 October 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 E [email protected] Z70 SES3 and AP4 ES 3.5.1.10.1 AP4 SES3 and AP4 ES – VOLUME 5 SES3 and AP4 ES – VOLUME 5 www.gov.uk/hs2 AP4 SS&Pur A4P-1.indd 37 30/10/2015 15:49:36 HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 3 and Additional Provision 4 Environmental Statement Volume 5 | Technical appendices Transport Assessment (TR-001-000) NOTE: this document was updated on 30th October 2015 to correct specific traffic data relating to CFAs 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The corrected text is highlighted in yellow. These corrections do not affect the outcome of the traffic assessments. October 2015 SES3 and AP4 ES 3.5.1.10.1 www.gov.uk/hs2 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 23 Spring 96
    The newsletter of the Wendover Arm Trust Issue No. 23 March 1996 Price 50p Free to Members THE WENDOVER ARM TRUST A non-profit distributing Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England No. 2353392, Incorporated 1989 Registered Charity No. 801190 Registered Office: 2 The Driveway, Anchor Lane, Boxmoor, Hemel Hempstead, Herts. HP1 1NT PRESIDENT Roger W Cork, FCA, FICM, FIPA. CHAIRMAN FUND RAISING Roger Lewis Mike Chessher Hastoe Hill, Tring, 27 South Park Gardens, Herts HP23 6LU Berkhamsted, Herts. HP4 1JA Tel: 01442 823378 Tel: 01442 865398 VICE-CHAIRMAN PUBLICITY OFFICER Bob Wheal Bob Wheat 467 Bideford Green, Linslade, 467 Bideford Green, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds. LU7 7TZ Leighton Buzzard, Beds. LU7 7TZ Tel: 01525 381614 Tel: 01525 381614 SECRETARY SALES OFFICER Richard House John Brooman 8 Eythrope Road, Stone 66 Bryants Acre, Aylesbury Road Aylesbury, Bucks. HP17 SPG Wendover, Aylesbury, Bucks Tel: 01296 748036 Tel: 01296 623542 TREASURER WORKPARTY CO-ORDINATOR Beryl Martin Roger Leishman 12 Chipperfield Close, Tel: 01442 874536 New Bradwell, Milton Keynes, Bucks. MK13 OEP COMMITTEE MEMBERS Tel: 01908 312239 Chris Mitchell John Rowe MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY Barry Martin IWA NOMINEE 12 Chipperfield Close, Elizabeth Payne New Bradwell, Milton Keynes, Bucks. MK13 OEP Tel: 01908 312239 EDITOR Ian Packe 2 The Driveway, Anchor Lane, Hemel Hempstead, Herts HP1 1NT Tel: 01442214126 Wendover Arm News March 1996 Chairman's Report Having just returned from a holiday Reg and Charles Jellis, of Seab- in New Zealand I find this English rook, have kindly offered us the use weather a little difficult to get of one of their lorry units for the acclimatised to again.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Excel Neighbourhood FINAL Copy GFB.Xlsx
    Q26 Add Coms 22/01/2021 26 Final Result Response ID Is the amount of traffic in The Ivers of Blanks Yes No Other concern to you? If it is, please say what concerns you most, and name any specific sites, roads or areas. 36 367 5 4 412 1 Yes, up to Denham O and swallows street is 8.74% 89.08% 1.21% 0.97% 100.00% a hazard 2 Yes the High Street has always been a problem, but with the restrictions through Richings & West Drayton, how does the large Question 26 delivery Lorries get to the Industrial Estate. 1.21% 0.97% 8.74% 4 Heavy lorries through village - from Ridgeway and Iver Lane 5 Yes. Iver High Street. (The same argument that has existed for years). 6 Yes - Iver High Street, Bangors Road North and South, Church Road, Slough Road. 7 Church Road is very busy as are Bangors Road North and South 89.08% 8 Outside Iver Junior School is an issue. I feel parking bays for the cottages opposite the school should be considered. Thus moving the central white line on the road to accommodate traffic for both directions. Cars cut the corner at Stonecroft Avenue, thus making the bend dangerous. 9 Church Road, Bangors Road North. 11 It is of concern to all who live here. Iver Village and A412 through Iver Heath particularly. 12 HGVs along Iver High Street are a constant concern. 13 Yes - Pinewood Studios traffic at peak times, affecting all the smaller link roads - Seven Hills Road, Thornbridge Road.
    [Show full text]