Japan 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Japan 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Japan 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the reliability, affordability Ireland and sustainability of Italy energy in its Japan 30 member countries, Korea 8 association Luxembourg countries and beyond. Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Please note that this Slovak Republic publication is subject to Spain specific restrictions that limit Sweden its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are Switzerland available online at Turkey www.iea.org/t&c/ United Kingdom United States This publication and any The European Revised version, map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also May 2021. status of or sovereignty over participates in the Information notice any territory, to the work of the IEA found at: delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and www.iea.org/ to the name of any territory, corrections city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword The International Energy Agency (IEA) has conducted in-depth peer reviews of its member countries’ energy policies since 1976. This process supports energy policy development and encourages the exchange of and learning from international best practices. By seeing what has worked – or not – in the “real world”, these reviews help identify policies that deliver concrete results. Japan was a founding member of the IEA back in 1974 and has remained an important and active member ever since. I am particularly grateful to Mr Hiroshi Kajiyama, Minister FOREWORD of Economy, Trade and Industry, and his colleagues for the strong collaboration the IEA enjoys with Japan today and believe this will be instrumental in building a secure and sustainable global energy future. Since the IEA last review of Japan’s energy policies in 2016, Japan has diversified its energy mix through the gradual expansion of renewable energy and the restart of nuclear power plants. This has benefitted both Japan’s energy security and the climate globally – Japan’s greenhouse gas emissions have now fallen for five consecutive years. But the challenge ahead is considerable. While Japan is well on track to meet its 2030 climate goals, its dependence on fossil fuels remains high. A very significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions post-2030 will be necessary if Japan is to realise its ambition of achieving carbon-neutrality by 2050. Japan’s strong innovation and technology base will play a vital role in developing the technologies needed to achieve its energy and climate ambitions. I applaud Japan for its leadership in advancing low-carbon hydrogen and carbon-recycling technologies, which will be crucial in decarbonising so called “hard-to-abate sectors”. But at the same time as these emerging technologies are scaled up, I encourage Japan to also accelerate its energy transition in sectors where low-carbon alternatives are already available, notably in the power sector. Wind and geothermal power have large potential in Japan and can complement the emissions reductions being achieved through the expansion of nuclear and solar energy. The IEA welcomes Japan’s decision to phase out inefficient coal power plants by 2030, which marks a turning point in Japan’s clean energy transition. Japan has made important strides in reforming its domestic electricity and natural gas markets. The increasing competition in these sectors is encouraging, but further reform is needed to achieve a true level playing field for all market participants. Additional regulatory reforms will also be important to encourage investments in zero-emission electricity and to improve power system flexibility. It will also be necessary to ensure that the market regulator has sufficient powers and independence. Energy security remains a focus area for the IEA and a priority for the Japanese government. The continued diversification of energy sources is an important development in this regard. I congratulate Japan for its recent steps to strengthen the resilience of its electricity system. I strongly believe that the policy and regulatory reforms proposed in this report can help Japan advance its energy and climate goals while supporting its economic growth. As it has done since 1974, the IEA will continue to stand side-by-side with Japan as it moves ahead with the process of implementing the next round of its domestic energy and climate policies as well as on the important work it is leading on global clean energy transitions. Dr. Fatih Birol Executive Director International Energy Agency 3 IEA. All rights reserved. IEA. TABLE OF CONTENTS ENERGY INSIGHTS Foreword ..............................................................................................................................3 1. Executive summary .....................................................................................................13 Overview ............................................................................................................................13 Japan’s vision of a decarbonised society ..........................................................................13 Main energy goals to 2030 ................................................................................................15 Electricity and gas market reform ......................................................................................16 Strengthening the resilience of the energy sector .............................................................17 Key recommendations .......................................................................................................17 2. General energy policy .................................................................................................19 CONTENTS OF TABLE Country overview ...............................................................................................................19 Supply and demand ...........................................................................................................21 Primary energy supply .......................................................................................................22 Energy production and import dependency ......................................................................23 Energy consumption ..........................................................................................................24 Japan’s general energy policy strategy .............................................................................26 Japan’s envisioned energy mix to 2030 ............................................................................26 Japan’s transition to a carbon-neutral society by 2050 .....................................................27 Liberalising electricity and gas markets ............................................................................29 Energy security ..................................................................................................................30 Taxation and subsidies ......................................................................................................31 Fossil fuel subsidies ..........................................................................................................32 Assessment .......................................................................................................................33 Liberalising electricity and gas markets ............................................................................34 Transition to a zero-carbon, resilient energy sector ..........................................................34 Recommendations .............................................................................................................37 ENERGY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION 3. Energy and climate change ........................................................................................41 Overview ............................................................................................................................41 Japan’s energy-related CO2 emissions .............................................................................43 Carbon intensity of the Japanese economy ......................................................................45 Climate change governance ..............................................................................................46 5 IEA. All rights reserved. IEA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Japan’s emissions reduction targets and policies .............................................................47 Main mitigation policies .....................................................................................................50 Carbon pricing ...................................................................................................................57 Other cross-cutting measures ...........................................................................................59 Innovation ..........................................................................................................................59
Recommended publications
  • Net Zero by 2050 a Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050
    Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 Interactive iea.li/nzeroadmap Net Zero by 2050 Data iea.li/nzedata INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the Ireland reliability, affordability Italy and sustainability of Japan energy in its Korea 30 member Luxembourg countries, Mexico 8 association Netherlands countries and New Zealand beyond. Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Please note that this publication is subject to Switzerland specific restrictions that limit Turkey its use and distribution. The United Kingdom terms and conditions are available online at United States www.iea.org/t&c/ This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword We are approaching a decisive moment for international efforts to tackle the climate crisis – a great challenge of our times.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Article the 90-Year Evolution of Japan's Academic Interest in Iran
    Article 29 The 90-year Evolution of Japan’s Academic Interest in Iran Keiko Sakurai Professor, Faculty of International Research and Education, Waseda University Director, Organization for Islamic Area Studies, Waseda University I. Introduction War II broke out. Despite Iran’s declared neutrality, Britain and the Soviet Union jointly invaded Iran in 1929 1941 marked the beginning of official diplomatic , believing Rez‥ā Shāh to have closer ties to the relations between Japan and Iran. The countries signed Axis powers, particularly Germany. Iran remained a “Japan-Persia Temporary Trade Agreement” that under Anglo-Soviet control until 1946. year, and Japan opened a diplomatic office in Tehran Under the Anglo-Soviet Occupation, Iran broke that August. A Persian diplomatic office was later off relations with Japan in April 1942, and in 1945 opened in Tokyo in July 1930. Diplomatic contacts declared war against the Axis powers, including Japan. between two countries, however, actually started as After the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into effect early as 1878, when Japan’s special envoy to Russia in 1952, diplomatic ties between the countries were Takeaki Enomoto met with Persian monarch Nās4 er al- reestablished in November 1953 and have continued 2 Dīn Shāh in Saint Petersburg. Two years later, Japan uninterrupted since then. sent its first official delegation to Tehran, headed by Iran’s oil boom in 1973 accelerated economic 1 Masaharu Yoshida. Yoshida was granted an audience interactions with Japan. Nonetheless, personal contact with Nās4 er al-Dīn Shāh in 1880, and brought an between Japanese and Iranian citizens was mostly official communiqué back to Japan from the Persian limited to diplomacy and business interactions, with Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawke's Bay Heritage News
    Hawke’s Bay Heritage News Newsletter of Historic Places Hawke’s Bay Inc. - June 2016 - We would like to say a huge thank you to East More from Portland Island Pier in Napier and Spicers in Havelock North. Both businesses allow us to meet on their Those who visited the re-sited Portland Island Lighthouse during our premises every alternate month for our meet- trip to Wairoa in April might be interested to learn that there is also a ings. piece of the lighthouse to be seen in Napier. One of the lenses from the lighthouse is on display at the Old Customhouse Museum in Ahuriri. The Museum is open on the first Sunday of each month during the winter and every Sunday over the summer. There is plenty to look at related to Ahuriri, the Port and surrounding areas and entry is free. The Museum is also seeking expressions of interest from people wishing to become volunteers to help at the museum. Contact the museum by e-mail, [email protected] or write to Private Bag 6006, Napier. 1 Friends of the Mokopeka Power Station The Mokopeka Power Station on the Maraetotara Stream is site which includes the power house, water race and the weir one of our industrial heritage gems in Hawke’s Bay and its across the Maraetotara Stream. The Friends group is in the heritage status is recognised by its inclusion on the Heritage process of formalising access and other necessary New Zealand List as a Category 1 site. The power station arrangements with the owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Energy 2019
    JAPAN'S ENERGY 2019 10 questions for understanding the current energy situation 1 2 3 4 Energy Economic Security Efficiency Environment Safety How much How much energy How are electric What steps are being greenhouse gas can Japan supply power rates taken to ensure a stable is being energy supply and independently? changing? emitted? safety? 5 6 7 Innovation and Renewable 3E+S Energy Efficiency Energy What is the Are programs being Is progress being government’s basic implemented for research made in introducing & development and renewable sources energy policy? energy efficiency? of energy? 8 9 Reconstruction Nuclear of Fukushima Power How is the progress of the Is nuclear power reconstruction of generation Fukushima? necessary? 10 Mineral Resources What kinds of mineral resources are used? Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Agency for Natural Resources and Energy Use this QR code to view the article. 1. Energy Security Changes in Energy Self-Sufficiency Ratio How日本は、国内の資源でどのくらいエネルギーを自給できていますか? much energy can Japan supply independently from domestic Q resources? A In 2017, Japan’s self-sufficiency ratio was 9.6% -- lower than other OECD countries. Comparisons of primary energy self-sufficiency ratios among major Renewal geothermal, How much is energy self-sufficiency ratio of Japan? 主要国の一次エネルギー自給率比較(2017年)nations (2017) enerugy (水力除く地熱、風力、太陽光など)( wind, solar, etc. ) 792.6% Hydoro electric 306.0% Nuclear 173.9% Power Natural gas Crude oil 92.6% Coal 68.2% 52.8% 36.9% 26.7% 16.9% 9.6% 5.3% No.1位 1 No.2位 2 No.3位 3 No.5位 5 No.11位 11 No.18位 18 No.22位 22 No.28位 28 No.33位 33 No.34位 34 No.35位 35 ノルウェーNorway オーストラリアAustralia Canadaカナダ アメリカUSA イギリスUK フランスFrance Germanyドイツ スペインSpain South韓国 Korea Japan日本 Luxembourgルクセンブルグ 出典:IEASource: 「World 2017 estimates Energy fromBalances IEA “World2018」の2017年推計値、 Energy Balances日本のみ資源エネルギー庁「総合エネルギー統計」の2017年度確報値。 2018”.
    [Show full text]
  • Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents 2
    Results of the Periodic Review and Component Stocks of Tokyo Stock Exchange Dividend Focus 100 Index (Effective July 30, 2021) Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents Addition(18) Deletion(18) CodeName Code Name 1414SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 1801 TAISEI CORPORATION 2154BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 1802 OBAYASHI CORPORATION 3191JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD. 1812 KAJIMA CORPORATION 4452Kao Corporation 2502 Asahi Group Holdings,Ltd. 5401NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION 4004 Showa Denko K.K. 5713Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Ltd. 4183 Mitsui Chemicals,Inc. 5802Sumitomo Electric Industries,Ltd. 4204 Sekisui Chemical Co.,Ltd. 5851RYOBI LIMITED 4324 DENTSU GROUP INC. 6028TechnoPro Holdings,Inc. 4768 OTSUKA CORPORATION 6502TOSHIBA CORPORATION 4927 POLA ORBIS HOLDINGS INC. 6503Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 5105 Toyo Tire Corporation 6988NITTO DENKO CORPORATION 5301 TOKAI CARBON CO.,LTD. 7011Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd. 6269 MODEC,INC. 7202ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED 6448 BROTHER INDUSTRIES,LTD. 7267HONDA MOTOR CO.,LTD. 6501 Hitachi,Ltd. 7956PIGEON CORPORATION 7270 SUBARU CORPORATION 9062NIPPON EXPRESS CO.,LTD. 8015 TOYOTA TSUSHO CORPORATION 9101Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 8473 SBI Holdings,Inc. 2.Dividend yield (estimated) 3.50% 3. Constituent Issues (sort by local code) No. local code name 1 1414 SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 2 1605 INPEX CORPORATION 3 1878 DAITO TRUST CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. 4 1911 Sumitomo Forestry Co.,Ltd. 5 1925 DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. 6 1954 Nippon Koei Co.,Ltd. 7 2154 BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 8 2503 Kirin Holdings Company,Limited 9 2579 Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. 10 2914 JAPAN TOBACCO INC. 11 3003 Hulic Co.,Ltd. 12 3105 Nisshinbo Holdings Inc. 13 3191 JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthys LNG Project Secures New Shipping Vessels
    Public Relations Group, Corporate Communications Unit Akasaka Biz Tower, 5-3-1 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-6332 JAPAN 4 June 2013 Ichthys LNG Project Secures New Shipping Vessels INPEX CORPORATION (INPEX) is pleased to announce shipbuilding and shipping contracts for two new vessels which will offtake and deliver LNG from the Ichthys LNG Project offshore Western Australia to Japan and Taiwan. Through its wholly owned subsidiary INPEX Shipping Co., Ltd. (‘INPEX Shipping’), one LNG vessel will be jointly owned with Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (‘”K” Line’) through Ocean Breeze LNG Transport S. A. and built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. The vessel will be operated by Ocean Breeze LNG Transport S. A. as a time charter. The 155,300 cubic metre capacity carrier will offtake 900,000 tonnes per annum of LNG from the Ichthys LNG Project and features an innovative peapod-shaped continuous cover protecting the four moss spherical tanks. The reduced weight combined with reheated steam turbine propulsion will contribute to an expected 20 per cent or more decrease in fuel consumption per unit cargo compared to conventional vessels. A second, 182,000 cubic metre capacity vessel will also be operated as a time charter by “K” Line for delivery to CPC Corporation, Taiwan. These arrangements will contribute to strengthening INPEX’s global gas supply chain which connects INPEX’s overseas gas assets with its Naoetsu LNG Receiving Terminal in Joetsu and its natural gas pipeline network in Japan. About the Ichthys LNG Project The Ichthys LNG Project is a Joint Venture between INPEX group companies (the Operator), major partner TOTAL group companies and the Australian subsidiaries of Tokyo Gas, Osaka Gas, Chubu Electric Power and Toho Gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Making It Happen © 2016 by the Edison Electric Institute
    FINANCING ASIA’S ELECTRICITY SECTOR 2035: Making It Happen © 2016 by the Edison Electric Institute All rights reserved. Published 2016. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system or method, now known or hereinafter invented or adopted, without the express prior written permission of the Edison Electric Institute. ATTRIBUTED NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER This work was prepared by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). When used as a reference, attribution to EEI is requested. EEI, any member of EEI, and any person acting on EEI’s behalf (a) does not make any warranty, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information, advice, or recommendations contained in this work, and (b) does not assume and expressly disclaims any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, advice, or recommendations contained in this work. The views and opinions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of EEI or any member of EEI. This material and its production, reproduction, and distribution by EEI does not imply endorsement of the material. Published by: Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2696 USA Phone: 202.508.5000 Website: www.eei.org Financing Asia’s Electricity Sector 2035: Making It Happen 1 FINANCING ASIA’S ELECTRICITY SECTOR 2035: Making It Happen 2 Table of Contents 4 Foreword: United States of America Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Convocation Notice of the 11Th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders
    THE FOLLOWING IS AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION PREPARED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE SHAREHOLDERS AND INVESTORS. THE OFFICIAL TEXT IN JAPANESE OF THE CONVOCATION NOTICE OF THE ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MAILED TO THE RESPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS. SHOULD THERE BE ANY INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE TRANSLATION AND THE OFFICIAL TEXT IN TERMS OF THE CONTENTS OF THE NOTICE, THE OFFICIAL TEXT SHALL PREVAIL. THE COMPANY ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR ANY MISUNDERSTANDING CAUSED BY THE TRANSLATION FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. CONVOCATION NOTICE OF THE 11TH ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS Date and Time: Friday June 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (Reception will open at 9:00 a.m.) Place: Ball Room “Aoi,” Second Floor, Palace Hotel Tokyo A Request to Our Shareholders 1-1, Marunouchi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo █ This ordinary general meeting of shareholders is to be held Deadline for Exercise of Voting Right(s) in Writing or via the by taking as many measures as possible to prevent the Internet: spread of infection of COVID-19 and ensure safety of Thursday, June 24, 2021 until 5:30 p.m. shareholders. Matters to be Resolved: █ As shareholders may exercise their voting right(s) in Proposal 1: Appropriation of Surplus advance in writing or via the Internet, we strongly Proposal 2: Election of 11 Directors who are not Audit and encourage you to make use of these options, and to refrain Supervisory Committee Members from attending the meeting in person on the day. Proposal 3: Election of 2 Directors who are Audit and █ If you are found to have a fever or appear to be unwell Supervisory Committee Members when you arrive at the venue, you may be refused entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Features of Landslides Caused by the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake in Japan
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 30, 2021 Geological features of landslides caused by the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake in Japan Yoshihiko Ito*, Shusaku Yamazaki and Toshiyuki Kurahashi HOKUDEN Integrated Consulting Service Co. Inc., 1-1 Higashi 3-chome, Kita 1-Jyo, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo-City, 060-0031, Japan YI, 0000-0002-0818-8103 *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Before dawn on 6 September 2018, a powerful earthquake with a Japan Meteorological Agency magnitude (Mj) of 6.7 hit central Hokkaido, causing more than 6000 landslides. As human damage, 36 of the 44 fatalities from the earthquake were from earthslides in Atsuma Town. Most slope movements were shal- low earthslides of mantle-bedded tephra and soil layers, but some were deep rockslides involving basement rocks such as shale and mudstone of Miocene. Although the shallow earthslides were easily distinguishable in photos from satellites or airplane, the rockslides were more difficult to identify owing to their vegetation. Based on the quick interpretation of a high-resolution (0.5 m horizontal resolution) shaded relief map made from digital elevation model data by airborne laser survey and supplemental field surveys, we effectively iden- tified 259 rockslides (196 certain ones and 63 possible ones) in Atsuma and Mukawa towns under newly invented identification criteria based on the scarp depth and positional relation between scarp and ridge topog- raphy. It was revealed that most rockslides were distributed within 10 km from the epicentre, while earthslides were distributed until 20 km north of the epicentre, and they seemed to be controlled by the thickness of mantle- bedded tephra and the soil layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen and Fuel Cells in Japan
    HYDROGEN AND FUEL CELLS IN JAPAN JONATHAN ARIAS Tokyo, October 2019 EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jonathan Arias is a Mining Engineer (Energy and Combustibles) with an Executive Master in Renewable Energies and a Master in Occupational Health and Safety Management. He has fourteen years of international work experience in the energy field, with several publications, and more than a year working in Japan as an energy consultant. He is passionate about renewable energies, energy transition technologies, electric and fuel cell vehicles, and sustainability. He also published a report about “Solar Energy, Energy Storage and Virtual Power Plants in Japan” that can be considered the first part of this document and is available in https://lnkd.in/ff8Fc3S. He can be reached on LinkedIn and at [email protected]. ABOUT THE EU-JAPAN CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION The EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation (http://www.eu-japan.eu/) is a unique venture between the European Commission and the Japanese Government. It is a non-profit organisation established as an affiliate of the Institute of International Studies and Training (https://www.iist.or.jp/en/). It aims at promoting all forms of industrial, trade and investment cooperation between the EU and Japan and at improving EU and Japanese companies’ competitiveness and cooperation by facilitating exchanges of experience and know-how between EU and Japanese businesses. (c) Iwatani Corporation kindly allowed the use of the image on the title page in this document. Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... I List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ III List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Challenges of Energy Scarcity in Japan
    Lund University Supervisor: Martin Andersson Department of Economic History August 2017 Overcoming the Challenges of Energy Scarcity in Japan The creation of fossil fuel import dependence Natassjha Antunes Venhammar EKHK18 Dependence on imported fossil fuels is a major issue in contemporary Japan, as this creates economic vulnerabilities and contributes to climate change. The reliance on imports has been increasing, despite efforts to diversify and conserve energy, and today imports supply over 90 percent of energy consumed in Japan. The aim of this study is to understand the context that contributed to the creation of this fossil fuel import dependence, and to examine how economic incentives and policy tools have been employed to mitigate the issue. This is done through a case study, using analytical tools such as thematic analysis and framing. It is argued that continued reliance on fossil fuel imports is due to a combination of; increasing consumption, absence of natural resource endowments, institutional structures, and alternative sources being considered unreliable or expensive. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Research Question and Aim ............................................................................................. 5 1.2 Relevance ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Economics of Global Warming
    [Show full text]