Institutional Change in Russia: the Case of Urban Land Rights, 1990-2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Institutional Change in Russia: the Case of Urban Land Rights, 1990-2013 INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN RUSSIA: THE CASE OF URBAN LAND RIGHTS, 1990-2013 By Marsha McGraw Olive A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland April 2015 © 2015 Marsha McGraw Olive All rights reserved Abstract Institutional Change in Russia: The Case of Urban Land Rights, 1990-2013 Why, when, and how do institutions change? The dissertation contributes to theory- building on these questions by examining variation in urban land rights in Russia after seven decades of state ownership. Urban land privatization is taken as a proxy for institutional change. Using inductive methods to identify patterns of urban land privatization, three cities are selected to represent institutional change that is either rapid (Kazan), incremental (St. Petersburg), or in stasis (Moscow). Case studies test the hypothesis that the motivation for institutional change will be a function of the revenue-maximizing incentives of political authorities. Consistent with Levi’s (1988) theory of predatory rule, at a given time, political authorities will opt for the highest- yielding and most feasible revenue sources that strengthen their hold on power and security in office. Why and when land was privatized correlated with these factors in the case study cities. How institutions change is hypothesized to vary according to consistency in policy actions by political authorities and the bureaucracy (explanatory variables), with public engagement in decision-making as an intervening variable. The variables are compared in the three case study cities in the 1990s and 2000s, using a land governance model to simplify the change process. Based on qualitative and quantitative indicators, the pace of land privatization (dependent variable) was found to be rapid only when political authorities, the bureaucracy and society were aligned on policy actions. Such alignment was rare. In all case study cities, administrative barriers to privatization declined sharply following the transformation of the land rights registration agency into a rule-bound bureaucracy, and public engagement contributed to institutional change. ii Dissertation Defense Committee Dr. Bruce Parrott, (Faculty Advisor), Professor and Director of the Russian and Eurasian Studies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Dr. Deborah Brautigam, Professor and Director of the International Development (I-Dev) Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Dr. Carlos Vegh, Fred H. Sanderson Professor of International Economics, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Dr. Blair Ruble, Vice President for Programs and Director, Urban Sustainability Laboratory; and Senior Advisor, Kennan Institute Dr. John Wallis, Professor of Economics, University of Maryland iii Preface and Acknowledgements This dissertation culminates a twelve-year educational odyssey undertaken while working full time at the Europe and Central Asia Region of the World Bank. Without the advocacy and mentorship of Professor Bruce Parrott of Johns Hopkins SAIS, completion of a lifelong dream would not have been possible. The research is dedicated to Professor Parrott for his enduring faith in my quest for academic excellence, and to my family and friends for their encouragement and patience. Lectures at the World Bank by leading scholars such as Daron Acemoglu, Douglass C. North, Elinor Ostrom, James Robinson, Dani Rodrik and John Wallis stimulated my interest in the New Institutional Economics, as did coursework at SAIS taught by Francis Fukuyama and Dorothee Heisenberg. I was inspired to explore the interlinkages of urban land and political economy in Russia by a thoughtful mimeo written by Leonid Limonov, Director-General of the Leontief Institute (St. Petersburg, Russia), on Power and Land Ownership in Russia: To the Question of Reliance on Path Dependency (Vlast’ i sobstvennost’ na zemliu v Rossii: k voprosu o zavisimosti ot traektorii predshestvuiushchego razvitiia). His insights and assistance in Russia were invaluable for this project, as was his perception that the New Institutional Economics offered the best conceptual framework for analysis of land relations in Russian history. I am grateful to several individuals for their time and wisdom, including World Bank colleagues Brian Levy, Jana Kunicova, Kimberly Johns (governance), Alain Bertaud, Gavin Adlington, Malcolm Childriss (urban land policy), Indermit Gill, Chor-Ching Goh (economic geography), Vera Matusevich, Gregory Kisunko, Juan Navas-Sabater, Sylvie K. Bossoutrot, Tatyana Ponomareva (Russian land relations and Doing Business), and Georgi Panterov (data analysis). Nargiza Tukhtaeva provided exceptional research and editorial support. iv Table of Contents Chapters 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 1 2. Analytical Framework and Research Design...…………………………………. 17 3. Urban Land in Russian and Soviet History…………………………………… 85 4. The Struggle for Urban Land Rights, 1990-2013…………………………….. 137 5. Moscow: A Case of Institutional Stasis……………………………………….180 6. St. Petersburg: A Case of Incremental Institutional Change………………….235 7. Kazan: A Case of Rapid Institutional Change…………………………………276 8. Urban Land Privatization and Development Outcomes……………………….314 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...361 Curriculum Vitae ……………………………………………………………………...385 v Chapter One: Introduction How do countries acquire institutions favorable to growth and prosperity? For development policy analysts and practitioners, this is the singular puzzle underlying the divergence in living standards between developed and developing nations. Institutions are rules and shared beliefs that influence the behavior of public and private actors. A large literature is devoted to examining institutions as a critical if not the primary explanatory variable in economic and political development.1 Buoyed by several Noble prize- winners of diverse disciplines,2 research in the field of the New Institutional Economics (NIE) is advancing the search for solutions to the puzzle of divergence in wealth among nations. Yet a generalizable theory to predict the path and pace of institutional change remains elusive.3 The term “institution” is highly elastic and used differently among the social science disciplines; even official publications of the World Bank apply divergent definitions. This confusion complicates the research agenda in an otherwise promising field of inquiry. The dissertation contributes to theory-building by taking a narrow interpretation of institutions and providing empirical content through the aperture of urban land privatization in the Russian Federation. The 1993 Constitution recognizes and guarantees the right of private property, including in land, thus reversing seven decades of state ownership under the Soviet Union. To date, urban land privatization in Russia for both firms and citizens has not received 1 For an excellent overview of the literature on institutions and practical applications, see Brian Levy, Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies, (Oxford University Press, 2014). 2 Leading theorists of the NIE who received Nobel prizes are Douglass C. North, Elinor Ostrom, Herbert Simon, Ronald Coase, and Oliver Williamson. Levy, Working with the Grain, 19. 3 As Oliver Williamson noted, “The new institutional economics is a boiling cauldron of ideas. Not only are there many institutional research programs in progress, but there are competing ideas within most of them.” Oliver E. Williamson, “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept 2000), 610. According to Fukuyama, we lack a theory of institutional change that can be generalized and applied as policy guidance. Francis Fukuyama, State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century, (New York: Cornell University Press, 2004), 22-23. 1 scholarly attention. It merits investigation as a self-standing case because it represents a radical institutional change in a country without a history of predominant private land ownership.4 Moreover, private urban land ownership holds the potential to transform Russia spatially, economically and politically. Yet in contrast to the rapid pace of enterprise privatization in the 1990s, the sale of municipal land to citizens and firms is proceeding slowly, with significant variance in rates of privatization. The puzzle is this: why are some cities privatizing land while others are not? What is driving the difference among cities in private land ownership? Using urban land privatization as a proxy for institutional change, the dissertation hypothesizes that the property rights regime will be a function of the revenue-maximizing incentives of ruling elites. Why and when institutional change occurs will depend on a policy decision by political authorities at a given time to privatize, lease, or seize privatized land. Following the theory of predatory rule (Levi 1988), political authorities will opt for the highest- yielding and most feasible revenue sources that strengthen their hold on power and security in office. Put simply, the choice for political authorities is to own land and collect rents, or to sell land and collect property taxes. This choice determines whether or not private land rights are established. The dependent variable is the outcome: it measures urban land privatization, i.e. the share of
Recommended publications
  • Public Contestation Practices in Russia in 2000–2020
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9657.09.06 EASTERN REVIEW 2020, T. 9 Roman Savenkov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-2444 Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia Department of Sociology and Political Science e-mail: [email protected] Public contestation practices in Russia in 2000–2020 Abstract. The article analyzes the influence exerted by the limitation of legal opportunities for public contestation in the 2000s on the scope of mobilization and the repertoire of public contestation practices. The term ‘public contestation’ is used to describe forms of individual and collective political activity focused on criticizing, denying and resisting the current government project, including by introducing alternative projects. The public contestation includes constructive actions of political actors not related to causing damage or disposing of political opponents. The paper is based on political and legal analysis and on some elements of event analysis. In the 2000s, the scale of public contestation on discursive and protest platforms was smaller than over the next decade, which did not create any needs for detailed regulation of such activities. At the same time, changes in political and legal opportunities in the electoral and party field were quite intense throughout 2000–2020. The most popular forms of public contestation were public events (in 2011–2018), as well as discursive activity on the Internet and in mass media (after 2018). During the above mentioned period, we see the biggest changes in legal opportunities in this field and increasing penalties for respective violations. The electoral field shows the pendulum dynamics: decreasing and increasing opportunities in 2000–2011 and 2012–2019, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • New Economic School Annual Report, 2004-2005
    РОССИЙСКАЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ШКОЛА N E W E C O N O M I C S C H O O L New Economic School Annual Report, 2004-2005 Moscow, August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECTOR’S INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................4 ACADEMIC PROGRAM........................................................................................................7 NES ACADEMIC PROGRAM .....................................................................................................7 NES ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................9 FACULTY...............................................................................................................................11 FULL-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS ...........................................................................................11 Tenured Faculty..................................................................................................................11 Tenure-Track Faculty.........................................................................................................11 PART-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS ...........................................................................................12 VISITING FACULTY ................................................................................................................12 RESEARCH............................................................................................................................13 RESEARCH CENTER ...............................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya Nab., 77, Bld
    Doing business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya nab., 77, bld. 1 115035, Moscow, Russia Paveletskaya Pl., 2, bld. 2 115054, Moscow, Russia Tel: +7 (495) 755 9700 Fax: +7 (495) 755 9701 2 Doing business in Russia Introduction This guide has been prepared by EY Russia to give the potential investor an insight into Russia and its economy and tax system, provide an overview of forms of business and accounting rules and answer questions that frequently arise for foreign businesses. Russia is a fast-developing country and is committed to improving the investment climate and developing a better legal environment for doing business. On the one hand, this makes doing business in Russia an attractive prospect; on the other, it can make for difficult decisions both when starting a business and further down the line. EY provides assurance, tax, legal, strategy, transactions and consulting services in 150 countries and employs over 300,000 professionals across the globe1, including more than 3,500 employees in 9 offices in Russia. EY possesses extensive, in-depth knowledge of Russian realities and is always ready to come to the assistance of first-time and experienced investors alike. This guide contains information current as at March 2021 (except where a later date is specified). You can find more information about doing business in Russia as well as up-to-date information on developments in its legal and tax environment on our website: www.ey.com/ru. 1 Who we are – Builders of a better working world | EY — Global Doing business in Russia 1 2 Doing business
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations and Technologies for the Navy and Maritime Areas
    Special analytical export project of the United Industrial Publishing № 04 (57), June 2021 GOOD RESULT ASSAULT BOATS IDEX / NAVDEX 2021 QATAR & SPIEF-2021 Military Technical Russian BK-10 Russia at the two Prospective mutually Cooperation in 2020 for Sub-Saharan Africa expos in Abu Dhabi beneficial partnership .12 .18 .24 .28 Innovations and technologies for the navy and maritime areas SPECIAL PARTNERSHIP CONTENTS ‘International Navy & Technology Guide‘ NEWS SHORTLY № 04 (57), June 2021 EDITORIAL Special analytical export project 2 One of the best vessels of the United Industrial Publishing 2 Industrial Internet of ‘International Navy & Technology Guide’ is the special edition of the magazine Things ‘Russian Aviation & Military Guide’ 4 Trawler Kapitan Korotich Registered in the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information 4 Finance for 5G Technology and Mass Media (Roscomnadzor) 09.12.2015 PI № FS77-63977 Technology 6 The largest propeller 6 Protection From High-Precision Weapons 8 New Regional Passenger Aircraft IL-114-300 The magazine ‘Russian Aviation & Military Guide’, made by the United Industrial 8 Klimov presents design of Publishing, is a winner of National prize ‘Golden Idea 2016’ FSMTC of Russia VK-1600V engine 10 Russian Assault Rifles The best maritime General director technologies Editor-in-chief 10 ‘Smart’ Target for Trainin Valeriy STOLNIKOV 10th International Maritime Defence Show – IMDS-2021, which is held from 23 to 27 June Chief editor’s deputy 2021 in St. Petersburg under the Russian Govern- Elena SOKOLOVA MAIN TOPICS ment decree № 1906-r of 19.07.2019, is defi- Commercial director 12 Military Technical nitely unique. Show is gathering in obviously the Oleg DEINEKO best innovations for Navy and different maritime Cooperation technologies for any tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies
    The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Edited by Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars · Mikhail Kopotev The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars • Mikhail Kopotev Editors The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Editors Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars University of Helsinki Maastricht University Helsinki, Finland Maastricht, The Netherlands Mikhail Kopotev Higher School of Economics (HSE University) Saint Petersburg, Russia ISBN 978-3-030-42854-9 ISBN 978-3-030-42855-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 by Nils Muižnieks
    Strasbourg, 18 September 2013 CommDH(2013)16 2ND QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 by Nils Muižnieks Commissioner for Human Rights 1 April to 30 June 2013 Presented to the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CommDH(2013)16 CONTENTS 1. Overview ....................................................................................................... 3 2. Missions and Visits ....................................................................................... 4 3. Reports and continuous dialogue................................................................ 10 4. Themes ....................................................................................................... 14 5. Other Meetings ........................................................................................... 17 6. Human rights defenders .............................................................................. 18 7. Communication and Information work ......................................................... 19 8. Next three months ....................................................................................... 21 9. Observations and reflections ...................................................................... 22 2 CommDH(2013)16 1. Overview In the second quarter of 2013, I touched upon issues related to police misconduct in a number of country visits, reports and media interventions pertaining to Greece, Russia, Spain, Azerbaijan and Turkey. News reports suggest that the issue is not confined to these countries, but is widespread throughout
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Nemtsov 27 February 2015 Moscow, Russia
    Boris Nemtsov 27 February 2015 Moscow, Russia the fight against corruption, embezzlement and fraud, claiming that the whole system built by Putin was akin to a mafia. In 2009, he discovered that one of Putin’s allies, Mayor of Moscow City Yury Luzhkov, BORIS and his wife, Yelena Baturina, were engaged in fraudulent business practices. According to the results of his investigation, Baturina had become a billionaire with the help of her husband’s connections. Her real-estate devel- opment company, Inteco, had invested in the construction of dozens of housing complexes in Moscow. Other investors were keen to part- ner with Baturina because she was able to use NEMTSOV her networks to secure permission from the Moscow government to build apartment build- ings, which were the most problematic and It was nearing midnight on 27 February 2015, and the expensive construction projects for developers. stars atop the Kremlin towers shone with their charac- Nemtsov’s report revealed the success of teristic bright-red light. Boris Nemtsov and his partner, Baturina’s business empire to be related to the Anna Duritskaya, were walking along Bolshoy Moskovo- tax benefits she received directly from Moscow retsky Bridge. It was a cold night, and the view from the City government and from lucrative govern- bridge would have been breathtaking. ment tenders won by Inteco. A snowplough passed slowly by the couple, obscuring the scene and probably muffling the sound of the gunshots fired from a side stairway to the bridge. The 55-year-old Nemtsov, a well-known Russian politician, anti-corrup- tion activist and a fierce critic of Vladimir Putin, fell to the ground with four bullets in his back.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Chinese Language
    WEEKLY UPDATED CURRENT AFFAIRS FOR WEEK 17/52 (19-25 APRIL) (2021) UN Chinese Language Day – Observed on Apr 20 UN Chinese Language Dayi s observed on April 20 The event was established by The UN Department of Public Information established the day in 2010 to celebrate multilingualism and cultural diversity as well as promote equal use of all six of its official working languages throughout the organization. Centre launches Startup India Seed Fund Scheme Union Minister for Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal launched the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS). The Fund aims to provide financial assistance to startups for proof of concept, prototype development, product trials, market entry and commercialization. An amount of 945 crore rupees corpus will be divided over the next 4 years for providing seed funding to eligible startups through eligible incubators across India. The scheme is expected to support an estimated 3,600 startups through 300 incubators. Italy initiates First ever mega Food Park & Food processing unit in India Italyhas launched its first ever mega food park project in India, comprising of food processing facilities, in a bid to further strengthen ties between the two nations. The pilot project named “The Mega Food Park” was launched virtually on April 17, 2021 at Fanidhar Mega Food Park, in Gujarat. The project will develop a synergy between agriculture and industry of both countries, besides focusing on the research and development of newer, efficient technologies in the sector. Sivasubramanian Ramann appointed as SIDBI Chairman and Managing Director SIDBI informed Sivasubramanian Ramann has taken charge as Chairman and Managing Director of the bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime 1.1 Gaizer’S Criminal Group
    INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER I. ORGANIZED CRIME 1.1 Gaizer’s Criminal Group ..................................................................................6 1.2 Bandits in St. Petersburg ............................................................................ 10 1.3 The Tsapok Gang .......................................................................................... 14 Chapter II.CThe Corrupt Officials 2.1 «I Fell in Love with a Criminal» ................................................................20 2.2 Female Thief with a Birkin Bag ...............................................................24 2.3 «Moscow Crime Boss».................................................................................29 CONTENTS CHAPTER III. THE BRibE-TAKERS 3.1 Governor Khoroshavin’s medal «THE CRIMINAL RUSSIA PARTY», AN INDEPENDENT EXPERT REPORT «For Merit to the Fatherland» ..................................................................32 PUBLISHED IN MOSCOW, AUGUST 2016 3.2 The Astrakhan Brigade ...............................................................................36 AUTHOR: ILYA YASHIN 3.3 A Character from the 1990s ......................................................................39 MATERiaL COMPILING: VERONIKA SHULGINA HAPTER HE ROOKS TRANSLATION: C 4. T C EVGENia KARA-MURZA 4.1 Governor Nicknamed Hans .......................................................................42 GRAPHICS: PavEL YELIZAROV 4.2 The Party
    [Show full text]
  • New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow
    New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow Suite 1721, Nakhimovskii Prospekt 47, 117418 Moscow, Russian Federation. ( tel(7)(095) 129-3844 or 129-3722 @ fax(7)(095)129-3722 = E-mail [email protected] NES Annual Report, 2000-2001 Table of Contents Introduction _______________________________________________________________1 The Academic Program ______________________________________________________3 Overview _______________________________________________________________3 Course Offerings for Academic Year 2000-2001 _______________________________3 Pre-Academic Year______________________________________________________3 Module I: 4 September - 29 October 2000 ___________________________________3 Module II: 30 October - 24 December 2000___________________________________5 Module III: 15 January - 11 March 2001 _____________________________________7 Module IV: 12 March – 6 May 2001 ________________________________________8 Module V: 14 May - 8 July 2001 __________________________________________10 English Language Instruction _____________________________________________11 Faculty __________________________________________________________________12 Public Seminar _________________________________________________________13 The Students______________________________________________________________15 Current Students: Profile_________________________________________________15 TABLE 1.A: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON STUDENTS ENROLLED AT NES, 2000-2001 -- CLASS OF 2001_________________________________________________________15
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA WATCH Duncan Deville, Guest Editor Graham T
    RUSSIA WATCH Duncan DeVille, Guest Editor Graham T. Allison, Director Analysis and Commentary Danielle Lussier, Assistant Editor Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project Editorial Staff: Melissa Carr, David John F. Kennedy School of Government Rekhviashvili, Annaliis Abrego, John Harvard University No. 7, March 2002 Grennan Rule of Law in Russia: The Wild East No More? Russian support for U.S. efforts in The new Criminal the war on terrorism has surprised Procedure Code. Long many Western observers. But this advocated by Western legal was not the only recent surprise experts as an important step in the development of the rule of law, from Moscow Western — the new Criminal Procedure Code advocates for the rule of law in will divest power from Russia’s (continued on p. 3) Russia also had much to celebrate in the closing months of 2001. Under IN THIS ISSUE: strong prodding by President Sergei Stepashin, p. 9 Vladimir Putin, the Duma passed several impressive pieces Chairman of the Auditing Chamber of the Russian Federation of reform legislation, including an entirely new Criminal Rule of Law and the Peculiarities of Russia Procedure Code, a potentially revolutionary land reform * law, new shareholder protections in amendments to the Scott Boylan, p. 10 Joint Stock Company Law, and the first post-Soviet Labor Regional Director for Eurasia, U.S. Department of Justice Long Awaited Russian Criminal Procedure Code is Enacted Code. * All of these bills had been stalled in the State Stephen Handleman, p. 13 Duma since the mid-1990s despite — or because of — Time Magazine International former President Boris Yeltsin’s efforts to get them passed.
    [Show full text]
  • Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05
    CO VERIN G CO N FLICT Reporting on Conflicts in the N orth Caucasus in the Russian M edia N M AY 2008 ARTICLE 19, 6-8 Am w ell Street, London EC1R 1U Q , U nited Kingdom Tel +44 20 7278 9292 · Fax +44 20 7278 7660 · info@ article19.org · http://w w w .article19.org ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05 i ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION Covering Conflict Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media May 2008 © ARTICLE 19 ISBN 978-1-906586-01-0 Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05 i i ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION Covering Conflict – Reporting on Conflicts in the North Caucasus in the Russian Media – ARTICLE 19, London, 2008 – Index Number: EUROPE/2008/05 ii i ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION A CKN O W LED G EM EN TS This report was researched and written by the Europe Programme of ARTICLE 19. Chapter 6, on ‘International Standards of Freedom of Expression and Conflict Reporting’ was written by Toby Mendel, Director of ARTICLE 19’s Law Programme. Chapter 5, ‘Reporting Conflict: Media Monitoring Results’ was compiled by Natalia Mirimanova, independent conflict resolution and media consultant. The analysis of media monitoring data was carried out by Natalia Mirimanova and Luitgard Hammerer, (formerly) ARTICLE 19 Regional Representative - Europe, CIS.
    [Show full text]