New Economic School Annual Report, 2004-2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

РОССИЙСКАЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ШКОЛА

N E W E C O N O M I C S C H O O L

New Economic School
Annual Report,
2004-2005

Moscow, August 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS

RECTOR’S INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................4 ACADEMIC PROGRAM........................................................................................................7

NES ACADEMIC PROGRAM .....................................................................................................7 NES ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................9

FACULTY...............................................................................................................................11

FULL-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS ...........................................................................................11

Tenured Faculty................................................................................................................. . 1 1 Tenure-Track Facult y . ....................................................................................................... . 1 1

PART-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS ...........................................................................................12 VISITING FACULTY ................................................................................................................12

RESEARCH............................................................................................................................13

RESEARCH CENTER ...............................................................................................................13

Projects.............................................................................................................................. . 1 3 Conferences ....................................................................................................................... . 1 4 Publication s . ...................................................................................................................... . 1 5

SELECTED PUBLICATIONS OF NES FACULTY.........................................................................16 NES AND CEFIR SEMINARS..................................................................................................18

NES/CEFIR Public Seminars ............................................................................................ . 1 8 CEFIR/NES Research Seminars........................................................................................ . 1 8 NES/CEFIR Job Market Seminars .................................................................................... . 1 9

ZVI GRILICHES DISTINGUISHED LECTURES ...........................................................................20

STUDENTS AND APPLICANTS.........................................................................................21

PROFILE OF CURRENT STUDENTS ..........................................................................................21

Table 1: Students Enrolled at NES in 2004-2005 ............................................................. . 2 1

RECRUITING ACTIVITIES........................................................................................................21

Table 2: Applicants: 2004 vs 200 5 . ................................................................................... . 2 1

ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS ...................................................................................................22 TUITION AND FINANCIAL AID................................................................................................22

Figure 1: Composition of the Incoming Classes With Respect to Tuition Waivers .......... . 2 3

GRADUATES.........................................................................................................................24

2005 GRADUATES AT A GLANCE ...........................................................................................24 CAREER OF NES GRADUATES ...............................................................................................24

Selected Employers in Russi a . ........................................................................................... . 2 5 Study Abroad ..................................................................................................................... . 2 5 Figure 2: Number and Share of the Students Going on to Get a PhD, 1994-2005........... . 2 6 Academic Placement.......................................................................................................... . 2 6 Table 3: Academic Placement of NES Graduate s . ............................................................ . 2 6 NES Graduates Baromete r . ............................................................................................... . 2 9 Table 3: Current Job Status and Location of the NES Graduates ............................................ . 2 9 Figure 3: Average income of NES graduates in 2004....................................................... . 2 9 Figure 4: Distribution of NES Graduates Income in 2004 ............................................... . 2 9

OUTREACH...........................................................................................................................31

REGULAR OUTREACH WORKSHOPS.......................................................................................31 REGIONAL SEMINAR FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING............................................................31

2

NES Annual Report 2004-2005

EXECUTIVE EDUCATION ........................................................................................................31

FACILITIES...........................................................................................................................33

LIBRARY................................................................................................................................33 COMPUTER RESOURCES.........................................................................................................33

FINANCES..............................................................................................................................35

Figure 5: Distribution of NES Revenues in AY 2004-2005 by Sourc e . ............................. . 3 5 Figure 6: Sources of Revenues in AY 2005-2006, plan..................................................... . 3 5

MAJOR FUNDERS ...................................................................................................................35 AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NES (AFNES).................................................................................36

FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM RUSSIAN BUSINESS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS..........36

COST RECOVERY AND SELF-FINANCING ................................................................................36

Figure 6: Tuitions and Loans in 2002-2005...................................................................... . 3 7

GOVERNANCE .....................................................................................................................38

BOARD OF DIRECTORS (BOD) ...............................................................................................38 INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD (IAB)............................................................................38 RUSSIAN ADVISORY BOARD (RAB) ......................................................................................38 RECTORATE...........................................................................................................................39 ACADEMIC COMMITTEE ........................................................................................................39 ADMISSIONS COMMITTEE ......................................................................................................40

APPENDICES.........................................................................................................................41

APPENDIX 1: COURSE OFFERINGS FOR 2004-2005................................................................41

Pre-Academic Year............................................................................................................ . 4 1 Module I:   September 6 — October 31, 2004.................................................................... . 4 1 Module II: November 1 — December 26, 2004 ................................................................ . 4 3 Module III: January 10 — March 6, 2005 ........................................................................ . 4 4 Module IV: March 7 — May 1, 2005................................................................................. . 4 6 Module V: May 10 — July 3, 2005.................................................................................... . 4 8 English Language Instruction ........................................................................................... . 4 9

APPENDIX 2: RESEARCH PROFILES OF THE TENURED-TRACK FACULTY ...............................50

APPENDIX 3: THESES ABSTRACTS, 2004-2005 .....................................................................63 APPENDIX 4: SUMMARY OF RESEARCH PROJECTS, 2004-2005 .............................................78 APPENDIX 5: CONFERENCE PROGRAMS ................................................................................85

XVI Research Conference (October 2004)........................................................................ . 8 5 XVII Research Conference (May 2005)............................................................................. . 8 7

APPENDIX 6: NES PUBLICATIONS, 1998-2005......................................................................90

Best Student Paper s . .......................................................................................................... . 9 0 Working Paper s . ................................................................................................................ . 9 3 Lectures note s . ................................................................................................................... . 9 6

APPENDIX 7: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON STUDENTS ....................................................97

Class of 2005 ..................................................................................................................... . 9 7 Class of 2006 ................................................................................................................... . 1 00

APPENDIX 8: APPLICANT PROFILE 2005 ..............................................................................102 APPENDIX 9: PLACEMENT OF CLASS OF 2005......................................................................103 APPENDIX 10: NES DIRECTORY ..........................................................................................105

3

NES Annual Report 2004-2005

RECTOR

The academic year 2004-05 has brought the School many changes and achievements. We have trained another 50 MAs in economics. The School’s faculty has expanded further and has made a breakthrough in terms of publications in the very top academic journals. The School has gone through a governance reform and a management succession. NES has also launched a bank-financed student loan program. Finally, the School has received first commitments for contributions to its endowment.

The most important change – certainly not an achievement – has been the retirement of Gur Ofer from the position of the Coordination of the International Advisory Board. Gur, a co-founder of the School in 1992 and the Coordinator of the IAB since then. He has essentially envisioned the School’s future and sketched the most unrealistic long-term plans in turbulent times when planning horizons spanned for months rather than decades. Building the School and implementing these plans required scores of truly outstanding individuals; many of them were united around Gur’s vision and inspired by his leadership.

In our annual conference in May we held a special session in Gur’s honor. While we hope that Gur has enjoyed it, we have only began to repay our debt to Gur and will continue to find ways to acknowledge the contribution of the missionary who made the School what it is today. The best way to do that is certainly to make sure that the School continues to accomplish the most ambitious goals set by Gur. In particular, last year we have managed to further increase our faculty by hiring Sergey Stepanov, PhD Free University of Brussels, NES’ 00. Sergey is joining NES in September 2005 to work in the field of corporate finance and microeconomics. We have also integrated faculties of NES and of the Center for Economics and Financial Research (CEFIR). The unified faculty of NES and CEFIR (now officially becoming “CEFIR at NES”) includes 13 full-time assistant and associate professors and 3 half-time full professors. Thirteen full-time faculty are certainly not enough for a sustainable department of economics, but it is thirteen more faculty members than we had in 1998. Also, it is already sufficient to be able to afford regular sabbaticals which are common in the Western universities, and are especially important in a small department like ours. After the sabbaticals of Ekaterina Zhuravskaya and myself in Princeton a year ago, and Konstantin Sonin’s last year, we will have Oleg Zamulin on leave to Stockholm next year. While we will miss Oleg’s teaching and have hard time replacing Oleg as Head of Admissions and Head of Outreach, we are happy that Oleg will have more time for his research.

The other achievement is the breakthrough in quality of faculty publications. Last year, the faculty’s work started to come out in the very top academic journals, including Quarterly Journal of Economics, Econometrica and American Economic Review.

In September 2004, IAB has also made the first tenure promotion. As it was my own case, I am not aware of the details, but it is my understanding that the process was very similar to those in the American research universities, with five letter writers from the best departments of economics.

Being rational homo economicus, we have never expected to replace Gur with one person however bright this person could be. Therefore we have created a collegial governance body, the Board of Directors, chaired by Maxim Boycko and including Erik Berglof, Arkady Dvorkovich, Barry Ickes, Valery Makarov (who has become the President of the School), and myself as Rector. The Board meets bimonthly to make strategic and operational decisions, evaluates the management of the School, and approves budget, audit, and executive compensation. On academic matters such as curriculum development, appointments and promotions of the faculty, the Rector and the Board consult International Advisory Board, chaired by Erik Berglof, which meets twice a year. The School’s Russian Advisory Board, also chaired by Maxim Boycko, meets annually and advices the School on its relations with Russia’s economics and economic policy community.

Such a governance structure is very similar to those at Western universities and greatly facilitates running the School as it clearly delineates authority and defines the responsibilities. Being the major guardian of the School’s long-term strategy and mission, the newly created Board has launched a re-evaluation of the School’s mission. The process took several months. The special Task Force, led by Assistant Professor Andrei Bremzen, has interviewed 50 stakeholders in Russia and abroad. In the end of the day, the Board decided that the School’s mission should be broadened but not substantially. The School’s primary focus should remain to maintain quality and focus on excellence in economics education and research. Yet, the new mission and the five year strategic plan to be developed next year will also include further efforts to provide NES graduates with skills in finance and in economic policy. The latter will enhance their career opportunities in Russia’s private and public sector.

4

NES Annual Report 2004-2005

The changes in governance also included changes within the School. Victor Polterovich was appointed the First Vice Rector, Alexander Fridman assumed a position of Advisor to the President. Zarema Kasabieva has become Vice Rector for Academic and Student Affairs. Oleg Adamovsky, the General Director at CEFIR, has also become Chief Operating Officer at NES.

In July 2005, NES graduated its twelfth class bringing the total number of graduates to 469. Out of them, almost 300 are working in Russia, including 200 in the private sector, mostly in international companies, investment banks, and consulting. Others pursued a career in academia, government and think tanks, including NES and CEFIR. About 170 graduates are working or studying abroad. Out of 160 NES graduates who went to continue their studies in the top PhD programs (such Harvard, MIT, Chicago, Stanford, Yale, Northwestern, Columbia, NYU, Penn, LBS, Toulouse and others), 50 have already completed their degrees. More than 30 PhDs work as academic economists in Western universities including MIT, Stanford, Yale, Columbia, Penn, NYU, LSE and others, in the World Bank and IMF, 10 are working in the private sector abroad, and 10 have returned to Russia.

Our recent survey of graduates has shown that NES education pays off whatever career the graduates pursue. Not only the starting salaries are high, averaging USD 15K in 2004. NES graduates also see their incomes grow fast as the job market rewards the fundamental skills they possess. The average and median income after 10 years upon graduation is USD 60 thousand.

The majority of 2005 graduates are also staying in Russia. Out of 50 graduates, only 9 will continue their studies in doctoral programs abroad, 5 will work in academia and think tanks in Russia, and others will work in the private sector. While our program is not exactly built for training private sector economists for Russia, the recent introduction of applied courses and applied specialization in finance have greatly improved our graduates’ career potential in Russia. The majority of our graduates find jobs well ahead of graduation. Also, unlike the previous years, they can afford to request starting the work upon graduation rather than discontinuing their studies whenever a position opens up. This also reflects a growing competition for NES graduates among Russian employers. The latter are now more active in targeting NES students specifically. Last year we have received tens of direct requests for candidates. There have been 10 employer presentations throughout the year – quite a few given the size of the graduating class. Yet, we certainly know that we can do better in terms of placing the students and maintaining the links to NES alumni. This is why we have established a special position of Admissions, Placement, and Alumni Coordinator and are very happy to have Svetlana Volkova assume this job starting September 2005. We will also continue to enrich our curriculum with Russia-related content wherever it is not compromising the international compatibility and quality of our program.

Similarly to the years of “Russian boom” of 1996-98, only 20% of our graduates apply for PhD programs abroad. Counting graduates of previous classes, this year we placed only 12 people in the doctoral programs in the US and Europe. As the numbers are going down, the quality remains high: our graduates are going to Harvard, Stanford (3 of them!), Yale, Penn, Duke, Toulouse, etc. Of course, one should not compare the current situation in Russia’s economy with that of 1998 when the meltdown put many fresh NES graduates out of their jobs. Yet, the 1998 experience has also provided a lesson that it is never too late to reconsider. NES program provides transferable and durable skills so that whenever a NES alumnus reconsiders the decision to stay in Russia, there is always an option to continue the studies in a PhD program abroad.

NES has also made a reasonable progress in the direction of financial sustainability. Even losing two major donors – the Eurasia Foundation and the World Bank – and seeing a substantial increase in rent, NES has managed to avoid financial crisis by undertaking certain costcutting measures and by launching a bankfinanced student loan program. The leading Russian retail lending bank Russian Standard has agreed to provide student loans to NES students for the full amount of tuition for 12 years with 2 year grace period. While the interest is unprecedentedly low for Russia, it is still as high as 10% p.a. in dollar terms which amounts to $144 monthly payments for 10 years upon graduation. This is why it is crucial to make sure that (i) NES graduates are able to find highly-paid jobs (ii) communicate the level of private returns to NES education to applicants. We are currently seeking ways to subsidize interest rates but so far it seems hard as the subsidies are taxed at 35% rate and too costly to administer.

Recommended publications
  • RESULTS 20 Kilometres Race Walk MEN

    RESULTS 20 Kilometres Race Walk MEN

    10th IAAF World Championships in Athletics Helsinki From Saturday 6 August to Sunday 14 August 2005 20 Kilometres Race Walk MEN 20 km kävely MIEHET ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC RESULTS TULOKSET ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHL 6 August 2005 18:40 TIME 18:38 20:19 TEMPERATURE 21 °C °C HUMIDITY 40 % % 1 2 POS BIB COMPETITOR NAT YEAR START MARK WARNINGS Diff 1 210 Jefferson PÉREZ ECU 74 39 1:18:35 1 SB 2 227 Francisco Javier FERNÁNDEZ ESP 77 15 1:19:36 + 1:01 3 240 Juan Manuel MOLINA ESP 79 38 1:19:44 PB + 1:09 4 395 André HÖHNE GER 78 1 1:20:00 2 PB + 1:25 5 927 Hatem GHOULA TUN 73 32 1:20:19 SB + 1:44 6 832 Vladimir STANKIN RUS 74 18 1:20:25 1 + 1:50 7 725 Benjamin KUCINSKI POL 82 30 1:20:34 PB + 1:59 8 644 Eder SÁNCHEZ MEX 86 23 1:20:45 1 + 2:10 9 158 Hongjun ZHU CHN 81 9 1:21:01 + 2:26 10 23 Luke ADAMS AUS 76 41 1:21:43 + 3:08 11 959 Andriy YURIN UKR 84 16 1:22:15 + 3:40 12 163 Luis Fernando LÓPEZ COL 79 20 1:22:28 + 3:53 13 699 Erik TYSSE NOR 80 42 1:22:45 1 + 4:10 14 464 Lorenzo CIVALLERO ITA 75 17 1:22:52 SB + 4:17 15 105 Sérgio Vieira GALDINO BRA 69 3 1:23:03 + 4:28 16 582 Il-yong SHIN KOR 79 27 1:23:10 SB + 4:35 17 596 Aigars FADEJEVS LAT 75 40 1:23:12 1 + 4:37 18 35 Jared TALLENT
  • New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow

    New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow

    New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow Suite 1721, Nakhimovskii Prospekt 47, 117418 Moscow, Russian Federation. ( tel(7)(095) 129-3844 or 129-3722 @ fax(7)(095)129-3722 = E-mail [email protected] NES Annual Report, 2000-2001 Table of Contents Introduction _______________________________________________________________1 The Academic Program ______________________________________________________3 Overview _______________________________________________________________3 Course Offerings for Academic Year 2000-2001 _______________________________3 Pre-Academic Year______________________________________________________3 Module I: 4 September - 29 October 2000 ___________________________________3 Module II: 30 October - 24 December 2000___________________________________5 Module III: 15 January - 11 March 2001 _____________________________________7 Module IV: 12 March – 6 May 2001 ________________________________________8 Module V: 14 May - 8 July 2001 __________________________________________10 English Language Instruction _____________________________________________11 Faculty __________________________________________________________________12 Public Seminar _________________________________________________________13 The Students______________________________________________________________15 Current Students: Profile_________________________________________________15 TABLE 1.A: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON STUDENTS ENROLLED AT NES, 2000-2001 -- CLASS OF 2001_________________________________________________________15
  • World Rankings — Men's 50K Walk

    World Rankings — Men's 50K Walk

    World Rankings — Men’s 50K Walk 1947–1969 no rankings done 1970 1 ........Christoph Höhne (East Germany) 2 ..Venyamin Soldatenko (Soviet Union) 3 ... Burkhard Leuschke (East Germany) 4 ................ Peter Selzer (East Germany) 5 ................. Otto Bartsch (Soviet Union) 6 .........Yevgeniy Lyungin (Soviet Union) 7 ......Winfried Skotnicki (East Germany) 8 .............Herbert Meier (West Germany) 9 ...........Peter Schuster (West Germany) 10 ....Horst-Rüdiger Magnor (West Germany) 1971 1 ..Venyamin Soldatenko (Soviet Union) 2 ................ Peter Selzer (East Germany) 3 ........Christoph Höhne (East Germany) 4 ................. Otto Bartsch (Soviet Union) 5 ......Winfried Skotnicki (East Germany) 6 . Bernhard Nermerich (West Germany) 7 ...........Igor Della Rossa (Soviet Union) 8 .........Yevgeniy Lyungin (Soviet Union) 9 ......................Paul Nihill (Great Britain) 10 .................................Larry Young (US) 1972 1 ....Bernd Kannenberg (West Germany) 2 ..Venyamin Soldatenko (Soviet Union) 3 ...................................Larry Young (US) 4 ................. Otto Bartsch (Soviet Union) Yohann Diniz won 5 ................ Peter Selzer (East Germany) the ’17 Worlds 6 .......Gerhard Weidner (West Germany) 7 ........Christoph Höhne (East Germany) with history’s 8 .............................. Vittorio Visini (Italy) second-fastest 9 ...Karl-Heinz Stadtmüller (East Germany) time 10 ...............Gabriel Hernandez (Mexico) Note: multiple Russian walkers are in the process of having major results annulled, meaning
  • LIST 50 Kilometres Race Walk MEN OSANOTTAJALUETTELO 50 Km

    LIST 50 Kilometres Race Walk MEN OSANOTTAJALUETTELO 50 Km

    10th IAAF World Championships in Athletics Helsinki From Saturday 6 August to Sunday 14 August 2005 50 Kilometres Race Walk MEN 50 km kävely MIEHET ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHL START LIST OSANOTTAJALUETTELO ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETI 1 2 12 August 2005 11:35 BIB COMPETITOR NAT YEAR Personal Best 2005 Best 230 Jesús Angel GARCÍA ESP 69 3:39:54 3:48:19 484 Alex SCHWAZER ITA 84 3:49:42 3:49:42 154 Shucai XING CHN 84 3:37:58 3:37:58 77 Andrey STEPANCHUK BLR 79 3:51:40 3:51:40 144 Yucheng HAN CHN 78 3:36:20 3:36:20 294 Jani LEHTINEN FIN 74 3:53:36 877 Peter KORCOK SVK 74 3:51:09 3:51:30 889 Fredrik SVENSSON SWE 73 3:53:46 3:57:16 643 Horacio NAVA MEX 82 3:56:26 3:56:26 328 Denis LANGLOIS FRA 68 3:47:31 3:47:31 460 Diego CAFAGNA ITA 75 3:55:18 3:55:18 598 Modris LIEPINŠ LAT 66 3:47:48 4:06:26 701 Craig BARRETT NZL 71 3:48:05 3:58:39 466 Marco DE LUCA ITA 81 3:55:30 3:55:30 742 Grzegorz SUDOL POL 78 3:49:09 650 Omar ZEPEDA MEX 77 3:50:17 3:50:17 695 Trond NYMARK NOR 76 3:44:55 3:46:05 596 Aigars FADEJEVS LAT 75 3:43:18 311 Yohan DINIZ FRA 78 3:45:17 3:45:17 241 Mikel ODRIOZOLA ESP 73 3:41:47 3:41:47 842 Aleksandar RAKOVIC SCG 68 3:48:01 3:57:30 424 Luis Fernando GARCÍA GUA 74 3:53:31
  • What Does Modern Political Economics Tell Us About the Fate of Russia’S Reforms?

    What Does Modern Political Economics Tell Us About the Fate of Russia’S Reforms?

    FREE Policy Brief Series What Does Modern Political Economics Tell Us about the Fate of Russia’s Reforms? Sergei Guriev, NES/CEFIR September, 2011 After the 2008-09 crisis, Russia is facing a new set of challenges. The pre-crisis sources of growth have been exhausted. In order to implement its growth potential and catch up with OECD countries, Russia must improve its investment and business climate. Although the reform agenda has been repeatedly discussed, it is not being implemented. The explanation is provided by modern political economics: what is good policy (in terms of social welfare and growth) is not necessarily good politics (for a country’s rulers). In this sense, modern Russia is a perfect example of the non-existence of a political Coase theorem. Although everybody understands that the status quo is suboptimal, the most likely outcome is further postponement of reforms. Whither Russia? book’s different chapters arrived at similar conclusions, which might be summarized as follows: while Russia came out of the crisis in In 2009, the New Economic School joined the a reasonably good shape and has nothing to Russia Balance Sheet project launched by two fear in the near term, it has serious long-term DC-based think tanks: the Center for Strategic problems that need to be addressed as soon as and International Studies and the Peterson possible; however , it is unfortunately the case Institute for International Economics. The aim that Russia is unlikely to implement the of the project was to assess Russia’s assets and required reforms, since they go against the liabilities.
  • Was Stalin Necessary for Russia's Economic Development?

    Was Stalin Necessary for Russia's Economic Development?

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WAS STALIN NECESSARY FOR RUSSIA'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT? Anton Cheremukhin Mikhail Golosov Sergei Guriev Aleh Tsyvinski Working Paper 19425 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19425 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2013 The authors thank Mark Aguiar, Bob Allen, Paco Buera, V.V. Chari, Hal Cole, Andrei Markevich, Joel Mokyr, Lee Ohanian, Richard Rogerson for useful comments. We also thank participants at the EIEF, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Harvard, NBER EFJK Growth, Development Economics, and Income Distribution and Macroeconomics, New Economic School, Northwestern, Ohio State, Princeton. Financial support from NSF is gratefully acknowledged. Golosov and Tsyvinski also thank Einaudi Institute of Economics and Finance for hospitality. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their colleagues, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, the Federal Reserve System, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w19425.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Anton Cheremukhin, Mikhail Golosov, Sergei Guriev, and Aleh Tsyvinski. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.
  • 50 Kilometres Race Walk

    50 Kilometres Race Walk

    22nd IAAF World Race Walking Cup La Coruña Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 May 2006 50 Kilometres Race Walk MEN ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHL START LIST ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETI RESULT NAME NAT AGE DATE VENUE WR3:36:03 Robert KORZENIOWSKI POL 3527 Aug 2003 Paris Saint-Denis CR3:39:22 Sergey KOREPANOV KAZ 342 May 1999 Mézidon-Canon WL3:42:53 Nathan DEAKES AUS 2824 Mar 2006 Melbourne 14 May 2006 8:00 BIB NAME NAT YEAR PERSONAL BEST 2006 BEST 3 Darren BOWN AUS 74 3:55:05 7 Chris ERICKSON AUS 81 3:58:22 3:58:22 11 Troy SUNDSTROM AUS 81 4:18:26 19 Andrei STEPANCHUK BLR 79 3:51:40 21 Sérgio Vieira GALDINO BRA 69 3:58:58 4:27:30 22 Tim BERRETT CAN 65 3:50:21 4:08:18 26 Cristian BASCUÑAN CHI 83 4:07:54 27 Latangadasu A CHN 84 3:40:23 3:57:53 33 Tianfeng SI CHN 84 3:42:55 4:00:38 35 Shucai XING CHN 84 3:37:58 36 Chaohong YU CHN 75 3:36:06 37 Chengliang ZHAO CHN 84 3:36:13 39 Daniel FOUDJEM GANNO CMR 74 46 Bernardo CALVO CRC 83 62 Salvador MIRA ESA 84 64 Mario AVELLANEDA ESP 74 3:49:35 3:55:48 65 José Alejandro CAMBIL ESP 75 3:56:44 3:56:44 70 Jesús Angel GARCÍA ESP 69 3:39:54 3:58:35 74 Mikel ODRIOZOLA ESP 73 3:41:47 3:53:04 78 Jorge Ignacio SILVA ESP 79 4:01:21 4:03:30 86 Degife Debeko
  • New Economic School Modern Economic Education Modern Economic the Russian for and Research and State Business Society, Mission of Nes

    New Economic School Modern Economic Education Modern Economic the Russian for and Research and State Business Society, Mission of Nes

    NEW ECONOMIC SCHOOL MODERN ECONOMIC EDUCATION MODERN ECONOMIC THE RUSSIAN FOR AND RESEARCH AND STATE BUSINESS SOCIETY, MISSION OF NES NES IS COMMITTED TO BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMICS MODERN COMMUNITY CAPABLE OF PROMINENTLY REPRESENTING ECONOMIC RUSSIA IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMICS PROFESSION BY: EDUCATION training new academic economists AND RESEARCH producing globally competitive economics research FOR THE RUSSIAN bringing back foreign-trained Russian economists to work in Russia contributing to improving Russia’s public policy through both SOCIETY, graduate training in economic policy and applied research at its Center for Economic and Financial Research BUSINESS AND STATE NES VALUES PROFESSIONALISM RESPONSIBILITY MUTUAL RESPECT INTEGRITY NEW ECONOMIC SCHOOL RUBEN ENIKOLOPOV Rector of the New Economic School (NES alumnus, MAE’2002) “The New Economic School is a university with unique atmosphere that tunes to a lively and genuine interest in economics. I know this firsthand – after all, I myself once graduated from the School with a Master’s Degree. The fundamental knowledge that can be obtained at NES is also highly demanded in business. At present as the School Rector I can say that both I and the entire university governance are making and of course will make every effort to maintain a high level of education at NES, so that the School remains the leading educational institution of Russia and Eastern Europe”. 3 NEW ECONOMIC SCHOOL Alexander Fridman Don Patinkin Arkady Dvorkovich Barry Ickes Gur Ofer Zarema Kasabieva Valery Makarov Zvi Griliches Shlomo Weber Victor Polterovich Sergei Guriev Stanislav Anatolyev Maxim Boycko Alexei Goriaev Konstantin Sonin HISTORY Pavel Katyshev Oleg Zamulin Oleg Shibanov 4 HISTORY OF NES 1992 Establishment of the New Economic School.
  • Is Political Risk Company-Specific? the Market Side of the Yukos Affair*

    Is Political Risk Company-Specific? the Market Side of the Yukos Affair*

    Is Political Risk Company-Specific? The Market Side of the Yukos Affair* † ‡ Alexei Goriaev and Konstantin Sonin September 2007 Abstract The Yukos affair, a state-led assault on controlling shareholders of a private Russian oil company, demonstrated the shaky nature of property rights in emerging markets. As it appeared, the market was more effective in determining the underlying causes than business and political analysts. While some rating agencies first predicted no threat to company creditors, the stock market correctly predicted that (i) political ambitions of the Yukos CEO and other majority shareholders would prove damaging to their business; and (ii) arrests of Yukos’ top managers for unrelated criminal charges was a signal of across-the-board toughening of the state policy towards big business. Among private companies, the risk appeared especially high for non- transparent companies, oil companies, and companies privatized via the infamous loans-for- shares auctions. Surprisingly, transparent state-owned companies were also very sensitive to Yukos events. This evidence suggests that investors considered the risks of a company losing its value due to the political ambitions of its top management, but were also concerned with tax and privatization reviews for private companies and inefficient government interference for state- owned ones. JEL classifications: G14, G38, P26 Keywords: firm-specific political risk, event study, Russian stock market * We thank Erik Berglof, Ingolf Dittmann, Tim Frye, Scott Gehlbach, Sergei Guriev, Barry Ickes, Arjen Mulder, Theo Nijman, Stephen Ongena, Alexei Pomansky, Andrei Shleifer, Andrei Simonov, Greg Trojanowski, Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, participants of the 2005 ACES, 2005 and 2006 EFA meetings, 2005 SITE/KEI conference in Kiev, and seminars at the Bank of Finland, Bilkent University, Erasmus University, Institute of Financial Studies (Moscow), Maastricht University, Swedish School of Economics (HANKEN), and Tilburg University for helpful comments.
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae STANISLAV A. ANATOLYEV Associate Professor of Economics Access Industries Professor of Economics CERGE-EI New Economic School Politických vězňů 7, office 316 Skolkovskoye shosse, 45, office 2.39 Prague 1, Czech Republic, 111 21 Moscow, Russia, 121353 Phone: +420-224 005 229 Phone: +7 495 956-9508 ext 233 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.cerge-ei.cz/people/stanislav-anatolyev Web: pages.nes.ru/sanatoly Professional Status Permanent positions: Associate Professor (tenured), CERGE-EI (under US permanent charter), Prague, 2016–present Full Professor, New Economic School, Moscow, 2009–present Associate Professor (tenured), New Economic School, Moscow, 2007–2008 Assistant Professor (tenure track), New Economic School, Moscow, 2000–2006 Visiting positions: Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow, European University Institute, Florence, Italy, Nov 2013–May 2014 Researcher, Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition (BOFIT), Helsinki, Finland, Jan–Apr 2005 Visiting lecturer, New Economic School, Moscow, May–Jun 1998, May–Jun 1999 Academic background: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Ph.D., Economics, 2000 University of Wisconsin-Madison, M.Sc., Economics, 1997 New Economic School, Moscow, M.A., Economics, cum laude, 1995 Moscow Physico-Technical Institute, Diploma, Applied Mathematics, 1992 Research Interests in Econometrics Method of moments: Many instruments, many regressors, optimal instruments, empirical likelihood, weak identification, large factor models, ridge regression Time series modeling, estimation and testing: Return prediction, directional forecasting, asymmetric loss, ARCH models, copulas, volatility, higher order moments, conditional density, sequential testing Publications and Research Papers Books: Stanislav Anatolyev and Nikolay Gospodinov. Methods for Estimation and Inference in Modern Econometrics.
  • Diversifying Russia / Contents 1

    Diversifying Russia / Contents 1

    DIVERSIFYING R U SSIA European Bank for Reconstruction Switchboard/central contact EBRD publications Harnessing regional diversity and Development Tel: +44 20 7338 6000 Tel: +44 20 7338 7553 One Exchange Square Fax: +44 20 7338 6100 Fax: +44 20 7338 6102 DIVERSIFYING London Email: [email protected] EC2A 2JN Information requests United Kingdom For information requests Web site RUSSIA and general enquiries, www.ebrd.com please use the information request form at Harnessing regional diversity www.ebrd.com/inforequest Project enquiries Tel: +44 20 7338 7168 Fax: +44 20 7338 7380 Email: [email protected] European Bank for Reconstruction Bank European Development and About this report The EBRD seeks to foster transition towards open market-oriented economies and promote private entrepreneurial initiative in central and eastern Europe, the Baltic states, south-eastern Europe, the Commonwealth of Independent States and Mongolia. To perform this task effectively, the EBRD needs to understand the key remaining transition challenges that these countries face. Russia, the largest economy where the EBRD operates, faces a very specific and difficult challenge – the task of diversifying its economy, ending its heavy reliance on exports of oil, gas and other minerals. This publication looks in detail at policies that can help to achieve economic diversification. It pays particular attention to Russia’s regional diversity and uses evidence from a number of surveys conducted jointly by the EBRD and the World Bank, including the Business Environment
  • Role of Civil Society in Transition

    Role of Civil Society in Transition

    Civil Society Programme at the Annual Meeting 2016 25 years of transition: The role of civil society in central and eastern Europe and Central Asia A fireside chat between Sergei Guriev, Professor at the Sciences Po Paris (incoming EBRD Chief Economist) and Biljana Radonjic Ker-Lindsay, Head of Civil Society Engagement at the EBRD Wednesday, 11 May 10.00- 11.30 CSO Meeting Room 1, Level 2 Civil society, operating in the space between public and private sectors, has played an important role in socio-political and economic transition processes around the world, including the EBRD’s traditional countries of operations. In 25 years since the establishment of the EBRD, civil society’s contribution to transition has varied across the post-communist transition region. In some countries, the work of civil society organisations (CSOs) has contributed to more democratic political systems and more open market based economies as a ‘reputational actor’ performing a ‘watchdog’ function and as a generator of ‘social capital’ necessary to sustain the change process through the difficult early years. In other countries, the focus of CSOs has been on providing a variety of social services particularly to disadvantaged and vulnerable people negatively affected by the transition process. Many civil society actors have been operating in restrictive regulatory environments, and have relied heavily on international donor funding. What has been civil society’s input into promoting good governance, sustainable development and economic inclusion in EBRD’s traditional region over the past few decades? What are the key lessons learned, from both its successes and failures that can be applied to other countries embarking on a transition process? What steps could be taken to increase the role of civil society in promoting positive changes in societies and economies? The discussion will look back at the key achievements and setbacks of the civil society sector in contributing to transition since the Bank’s establishment.