DOCSLIB.ORG

Matteo J. Milazzo, the Chetnik Movement and the Yugoslav Resistance, Baltimore and London: the John Hopkins University Press, 1975

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Matteo J. Milazzo, the Chetnik Movement and the Yugoslav Resistance, Baltimore and London: the John Hopkins University Press, 1975 Matteo J. Milazzo, The Chetnik Movement and the Yugoslav Resistance, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1975. 208 pp. $12.00. The opening up in recent years of much previously classified source material has enabled historians to take a new look at the mythomania that has surrounded the history of resistance in Yugoslavia during World War II. Two recent books look at the Chetnik side of this story. The first to come out was '1'he Chetniks: War and Revolution in Yugoslavia 1941-1945 by Professor J. Tomasevich; the second is the volume under review. Milazzo's book confirms Tomasevich's major general conclusion: that the idea of Mihailovic as a great Yugoslav resistance leader was a myth propagated by the Yugoslav government-in-exile for its own political purposes and disseminated by the Allies as wartime propaganda. It also adds considerable evidence, mainly from the huge mass of German and Italian war documents captured by the Allies. Milazzo has made detailed use of records of the Italian Comando Supremo, especially those concerning German-Italian dealings about Chetniks, and Italian occupying forces' relations with Chetniks. He also uses documents showing decoded intercepts of Chetnik radio messages as well as some private papers of Mussolini; it should be added that he has made considerable use of Yugoslav sources and of some Yugoslav histories of the war written from a pro-Partisan standpoint. Milazzo's book presents a lucid and compact account of what must be the most complex story of resistance in any country occupied by the Axis. He traces the history of the Chetnik movement from its inception after the capitula- tion of Yugoslavia in 1941, when a few Royal Yugoslav army officers including Colonel Dra�a Mihailovic took to the hills in Serbia, through the various phases of their attempts in 1942 to build a resistance movement, through the many phases of their collaboration with Italians and negotia- tions with Germans, to their ultimate disintegration in the final stages of the war. The newest material in Milazzo's book deals with the Chetnik movement-which he characterises as "The Serbian National Movement" (pp. 42-61)-in the Italian zones of occupation. He shows how the revolt in Montenegro in the summer of 1941 polarized resistance between Chet- niks and Communists; it also sowed the seeds of distrust between Germans and Italians since the former realized that the Italians would never be able to assert their authority effectively outside the larger cities (p. 44). It was a catalyst in other ways since it led to the final breakdown in relations between Partisan and Chetnik detachments and to the vision of some of Mihailovic's officers and probably of Mihailovic himself of how the Chetniks could exploit both the Axis and Great Britain. The Chetniks in this first period were unable to persuade the Germans to accept them as allies or to rearrange the occupation system in eastern Bosnia in exchange for an armistice; they also failed to impose their plans and leadership on the Partisans. But it should be pointed out that their success in persuading the British to accept them as the only recognized resistance movement in Yugoslav territories was a major achievement which was only subverted by their own crass political mismanagement, their unwillingness to engage in fighting other than civil war against the Partisans, and by the violently Pan-Serb nationalism of the political program which they drew up early in 1942. This program (p. 92) included the restoration of King Peter II; the "crea- tion within a Greater Yugoslavia of a Greater Serbia ethnically pure, which will include Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Syrmia, Banat and Backa," and the removal from state terri- tories of all minorities and a-national elements; as well as the colonization of those territories by Montenegrins. It is not surprising that the movement failed to attract support from other than extreme right-wing elements in regions outside Serbia and parts of Montenegro. Milazzo analyses the Chetniks' dilemma of tactical collaboration with German and Italian occupying forces and with the German-controlled puppet leader Nedic in Serbia. That negotiations with all three started from September, 1941, is established by irrefutable evidence and destroys the myth for so long prevalent in some circles that Mihailovic and the Chetniks were a heroic force fighting alone, backed by the British but not helped by them. In fact the British were informed in detail-from 1942 by intercepts as well as other sources of intelligence-of Mihailovic's and other Chetnik leaders' devious attempts to gain support from the Axis; up to 1943 they turned a blind eye for political reasons. Milazzo goes into considerable detail about relations between Italians and Chetniks in 1942 and 1943, exposing the reasons why both sides thought to make a profitable deal by working together. Mihailovic hoped to gain military aid against the Partisans (in this he succeeded up to 1943); he also hoped to establish Chetnik units in areas of eastern Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Croatia, which would give him a squatter's right at the end of the war, whatever its outcome. The Italians wanted to used the Chetniks to occupy this same territory which they were hoping to take over as German troops were removed for operations on the Eastern front. In the long run neither party gained from the Italo-Chetnik alliances, though the Chetniks were able to recruit, arm, feed, and quarter their troops with Italian aid from 1942 until the Italian capitulation in the fall of 1943. The account of Chetnik negotiations with the Nedic authorities is not dealt with in any great detail; this will no doubt be dealt with in the forthcoming second volume of Tomasevich's trilogy. Milazzo devotes a useful and interesting chapter (pp. 113-39) to operation Weiss, the German military operation to encircle and exterminate the numerous and increasingly well- organized Partisan army. The operation began on 20 January 1943 and German military units, Italians, and 20,000 Chetnik troops were involved. By the end of April, Chetniks and Italians had been routed, the Germans had failed in their objective, and Tito's troops had broken through the ring that had almost encircled them. This operation has become an heroic victory in Partisan mythology and was undoubtedly a major triumph for Tito. Milazzo attempts to give a clear account of the actions of the different Chetnik groups involved. Yet it seems likely that this is a battlefield which will continue to be fought over by military historians, and the interaction of political and military considerations affecting all participants both during the operation and in the short aftermath before operation Weiss merged into operation Schwarz is still unclear. Milazzo does establish that the failure of this operation marked the watershed in the civil war between Chetniks and Partisans. It led to a crisis in Chetnik leadership and according to Milazzo "marked the defini- tive collapse of the non-Communist resistance in Yugoslavia" (p. 140). Milazzo contends that the crisis in leadership was the fault of Mihailovic who stayed away from the troops and left direct command operations in the inexpert hands of Ostojic who was completely unable-as was Mihailovic himself-to control other Chetnik leaders. Many Chetniks left the movement and some joined the Partisans, who received British officers in May and an official British mission in September. One of the German aims of operation Schwarz had been to disarm all Chetniks. As Professor Milazzo shows from official German documents, they were also receiving emissaries from Tito to discuss a temporary arrangement "whereby they [the Partisans] would call off hostilities against occupation troops in return for a 'free hand' to settle accounts with Mihailo- vic" (p. 133). Milazzo points out that Tito was asking only for temporary freedom of action and it was not "the sort of ongoing collaboration which the Chetniks developed with the Italians." In any case, the Germans refused the suggestion and a few weeks later Captain Deakin arrived at Tito's headquarters. This was the crucial phase of the war when the Germans, as well as both Mihailovic and Tito, were expecting an Allied landing in the Balkans. The Germans knew of Mihailovic's intention to support the expected invasion, they knew that Italy's support for the war was rapidly diminish- ing, and were determined that in the event of an Allied landing and Italian capitulation, no Chet- niks and as few Partisans as possible should be in a position to profit by it. In fact, no such invasion was planned. Mihailovic's disappointment when the invasion turned out to be southern Italy added to his already embittered attitude to the British and fuel was added to the flames of his anger when he was given no prior warning of the Italian capitulation. He believed that the British officer at his headquarters, Colonel Bailey, knew about the Italian surrender and had been ordered not to warn him. Colonel Bailey himself informed this reviewer that he had no prior knowledge whatsoever about the Italian capitulation. It is ironical that Tito made the same infuriated complaint to the British officer, Brigadier Fitzroy MacLean, who was at his headquarters at this time. In his final chapter on "Collaboration and Defeat," Milazzo describes how the Germans-as well as the general war situation and the increasing success of the Partisans-contributed to the demoralization of the remaining Chetniks who became for the most part auxiliaries for the Germans (p. 162), who ex- ploited their Serb nationalist feelings by using them in some operations against the Partisans. The Germans realized by this time that the estrangement between Chetniks and the Allies was final, in spite of some tolerated extra-curricular contacts between General Donovan and Mihailovic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 the Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff
    1 The Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff The earlier part of the Bronze Age in temperate southeastern Europe (c. 2200– 1500 B.C.) presents a confusing picture to the unwary archaeologist. Although over the years more publications have appeared in English, German, and French, many basic site reports and syntheses are only fully available in Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Serbian, or other indigenous languages. Often the names of apparently identical archaeological cultures change with bewildering abandon as one crosses modern national borders or even moves between regions of the same country. This part of the world has a history (beginning in the mid–nineteenth century) of antiquarian collecting and detailed specialist typological studies, especially of ceramics and metal objects, with far less effort expended on the more mundane aspects of prehistoric life. Only since the 1980s have studies become available that incorporate the analysis of plant and animal material from Bronze Age sites, and these are far from the rule. To some extent, this is due to the nature of the archaeological record, that is, the sites and material that have survived from the Early and Middle Bronze Age. With the exception of habitation mounds (tells) and burial mounds (tumuli), both of which have a limited distribution in the earlier part of the Bronze Age, most sites are shallow, close to the modern ground surface, and easily disturbed. Farming and urban development has been more destructive to these sites than to the more deeply buried sites of earlier periods. The typically more dispersed settlement pattern of the Bronze Age in most of this region results in smaller sites, more vulnerable to the vagaries of history than the more concentrated nucleated sites of the later Neolithic or Eneolithic (sometimes called Copper Age) of the fifth and fourth millennia B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical and Economic Influences on the Colonisation of the Banat
    Geographica Pannonica No. 2, 20-25 (1998) Geographical and Economic Influences on the Colonisation of the Banat Bruce Mitchell School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU, Englad Saša Kicošev Institute of Geography, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Yugoslavia Abstract In the following paper, the influence of selected factors on the developing settlement of the Banat is examined. These include the historical river network and marshes, the availability of building materials, fuel and drinking water, and the variety, location and extractability of raw materials. Mention is also made of the effect of some of these factors on the general state of health of the population. This is followed by a brief account of processes of colonisation in the Banat during the 18th and 19th centuries. The motivations of the colonists themselves, and of their rulers, the context in which they were operating, and a brief appreciation of the contributions of the various ethnic groups involved. Bounds and Area The Banat is a conventional label for a territorial entity whose existence, despite a remarkably chequered administrative history, is acknowledged by Serb, Romanian, German and Hungarian, and there is close agreement on its geographical bounds. The courses of the Danube, Tisa and Maros embrace the Banat on three sides: divided from the Bačka on the west by the southward flow of the Tisa (Hungarian, Tisza), the Banat is separated "naturally" from Srem and Serbia, and Wallachia by the broad stripe of the Danube as far as Orsova.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Evolution of a Rifted Continental Arc: Integrated ID-TIMS and LA-ICPMS Study of Magmatic Zircons from the Eastern Srednogorie, Bulgaria
    LITHOS-02763; No of Pages 15 Lithos xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Lithos journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Time evolution of a rifted continental arc: Integrated ID-TIMS and LA-ICPMS study of magmatic zircons from the Eastern Srednogorie, Bulgaria S. Georgiev a,⁎, A. von Quadt a, C.A. Heinrich a,b, I. Peytcheva a,c, P. Marchev c a Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zurich, Clausiusstrasse 25, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland b Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Zurich, Switzerland c Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev St., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria article info abstract Article history: Eastern Srednogorie in Bulgaria is the widest segment of an extensive magmatic arc that formed by conver- Received 24 December 2011 gence of Africa and Europe during Mesozoic to Tertiary times. Northward subduction of the Tethys Ocean Accepted 10 June 2012 beneath Europe in the Late Cretaceous gave rise to a broad range of basaltic to more evolved magmas with locally Available online xxxx associated Cu–Au mineralization along this arc. We used U–Pb geochronology of single zircons to constrain the temporal evolution of the Upper Cretaceous magmatism and the age of basement rocks through which the Keywords: magmas were emplaced in this arc segment. High precision isotope dilution-thermal ionization mass spectrometry U–Pb zircon ages – ID-TIMS (ID-TIMS) was combined with laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICPMS) for LA‐ICPMS spatial resolution within single zircon grains. Eastern Srednogorie arc Three tectono-magmatic regions are distinguished from north to south within Eastern Srednogorie: East Balkan, Geodynamic evolution Yambol–Burgas and Strandzha.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Tell Communities in Context: an Exploration Into Culture
    Bronze Age Tell Kienlin This study challenges current modelling of Bronze Age tell communities in the Carpathian Basin in terms of the evolution of functionally-differentiated, hierarchical or ‘proto-urban’ society Communities in Context under the influence of Mediterranean palatial centres. It is argued that the narrative strategies employed in mainstream theorising of the ‘Bronze Age’ in terms of inevitable social ‘progress’ sets up an artificial dichotomy with earlier Neolithic groups. The result is a reductionist vision An exploration into culture, society, of the Bronze Age past which denies continuity evident in many aspects of life and reduces our understanding of European Bronze Age communities to some weak reflection of foreign-derived and the study of social types – be they notorious Hawaiian chiefdoms or Mycenaean palatial rule. In order to justify this view, this study looks broadly in two directions: temporal and spatial. First, it is asked European prehistory – Part 1 how Late Neolithic tell sites of the Carpathian Basin compare to Bronze Age ones, and if we are entitled to assume structural difference or rather ‘progress’ between both epochs. Second, it is examined if a Mediterranean ‘centre’ in any way can contribute to our understanding of Bronze Age tell communities on the ‘periphery’. It is argued that current Neo-Diffusionism has us essentialise from much richer and diverse evidence of past social and cultural realities. Tobias L. Kienlin Instead, archaeology is called on to contribute to an understanding of the historically specific expressions of the human condition and human agency, not to reduce past lives to abstract stages on the teleological ladder of social evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Destruction of Yugoslavia
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 19, Issue 2 1995 Article 18 The Destruction of Yugoslavia Svetozar Stojanovic∗ ∗ Copyright c 1995 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The Destruction of Yugoslavia Svetozar Stojanovic Abstract If my statement about the first Yugoslavia being in many ways a non-synchronized and con- tradictory state is correct, what then can be said about the second Yugoslavia that endeavored, by keeping silent, to fill in the fatal fissure opened in Jasenovac and other places of annihilation of Serbs in the so-called Independent State of Croatia during the Second World War? For that reason, the former intermediator of the “international community” in Yugoslav conflicts, Lord Carrington, has repeatedly stated that with its new Constitution, Croatia rekindled the conflict with the Serbs. The essay will begin by discussing discuss the paralization to the breaking-up of the state, before moving to a discussion of the wars between secessionists and antisecessionists. We will also ex- amine the role of the Yugoslav Army, and Western triumphalism regarding the Yugoslav tragedy. THE DESTRUCTION OF YUGOSLAVIA Svetozar Stojanovic* I. A NON-SYNCHRONIZED AND CONTRADICTORY STATE From its formation in 1918, Yugoslavia was a non-synchronized and contradictory state. It was created mainly by Serbia and Mon- tenegro, countries that were victors in the First World War. The Serbian nation's human and material sacrifice invested in Yugo- slavia was unparalleled. Serbs were convinced that they could best solve their national question in a broader Southern Slav framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Food As Intangible Cultural Heritage the Česnica Among
    Lingvistika FOOD AS INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE — * THE ČESNICA AMONG S ERBS IN R OMANIA Svetlana Ćirković The UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO 2003) ** shift- ed the focus away from material culture to living cultural practice and events that form the foundation of group identity and collective memory. “The ‘intangible cultural heritage’ means the practices, rep- resentations, expressions, knowledge, skills—along with the associated instruments, objects, artefacts and cultural spaces—that communities, groups and, in some cases, individuals, recognize as part of their cultural heritage. This intangible cultural heritage, transmitted from generation to generation, is constantly recreated by communities and groups in response to their environment, their interaction with nature and their history, and provides them with a sense of identity and continuity, thus promoting re- spect for cultural diversity and human creativity”. UNESCO’s list of the elements of intangible that these countries began to develop an inven- cultural heritage attracted worldwide attention tory of culinary practices, which also constructs and the number of candidates for inclusion has a systematic narrative about them (Di Giovine, increased. Brulotte 2014: 13). Food appeared for the ^ rst time on UNES- Heritage cuisine is becoming a subject of re- CO’s world heritage list of world heritage in 2010 search for many anthropologists who point out with two culinary practices and one product: the that it is a dominant feature even in remote, French gastronomic meal, traditional Mexican impoverished regions, connecting individuals cuisine—ancestral, ongoing community culture, through time and place with the discourse of the Michoacan paradigm 1—and gingerbread cra heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of the End of Federal Yugoslavia
    The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Number 10 01 Robert M. H ayden The Beginning of the End of Federal Yugoslavia The Slovenian Amendment Crisis of 1989 ~EES THE C E N T E R FOR R US SIAN & EA ST E U RO P E A N S T UDIE S U N IV E RS I T Y OF PITT SBURGH J The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Number 1001 Robert M. Hayden The Beginning of the End of Federal Yugoslavia The Slovenian Amendment Crisis of 1989 &EES TH E C E N T E R F O R RUSS I AN Ill: E AS T E U RO PE A N STU DIES U N I V ERS I T Y O F PITT SB UR GH Robert M. Hayden is Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh. He holds degrees in both Anthropology and Law. His research interests have taken him to India and Yugoslavia numerous times to conduct field work. In 1990-91 Hayden was a Fulbright Distinguished Professor at the University of Belgrade. He is the author of Social Courts in Theory and Practice: Yugoslav Workers' Courts in Comparative Perspective (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990). December 1992 ISSN 08899-275X The Carl Beck Papers Editors: William Chase, Bob Donnorununo, Ronald H. Linden Assistant Editors: Mitchell Bjerke, Martha Snodgrass Cover design : Mike Savitski Submissions to The Carl Beck Papers are welcome. Manuscripts must be in English, double-spaced throughout, and less than 120 pages in length. Acceptance is based on anonymous review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genealogy of Dislocated Memory: Yugoslav Cinema After the Break
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses April 2014 The Genealogy of Dislocated Memory: Yugoslav Cinema after the Break Dijana Jelaca University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Jelaca, Dijana, "The Genealogy of Dislocated Memory: Yugoslav Cinema after the Break" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/vztj-0y40 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/10 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GENEALOGY OF DISLOCATED MEMORY: YUGOSLAV CINEMA AFTER THE BREAK A Dissertation Presented by DIJANA JELACA Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2014 Department of Communication © Copyright by Dijana Jelaca 2014 All Rights Reserved THE GENEALOGY OF DISLOCATED MEMORY: YUGOSLAV CINEMA AFTER THE BREAK A Dissertation Presented by DIJANA JELACA Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ Leda Cooks, Chair _______________________________________ Anne Ciecko, Member _______________________________________ Lisa Henderson, Member _______________________________________ James Hicks, Member ____________________________________ Erica Scharrer, Department Head Department of Communication TO LOST CHILDHOODS, ACROSS BORDERS, AND TO MY FAMILY, ACROSS OCEANS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is about a part of the world that I call “home” even though that place no longer physically exists. I belong to that “lost generation” of youth whose childhoods ended abruptly when Yugoslavia went up in flames.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Assessment Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
    COUNTRY ASSESSMENT FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA COUNTRY INFORMATION AND POLICY UNIT APRIL 2001 COUNTRY BRIEF FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA Contents Paragraph I INTRODUCTION 1.1 II GEOGRAPHY 2.1 III HISTORY 3.1 Up to end of Kosovo war IV POLITICAL SITUATION Legal Framework 4.1 Serbia 4.3 Montenegro 4.12 V ECONOMY 5.1 VI HUMAN RIGHTS: GENERAL Judiciary 6.1 Freedom of Political Opinion 6.7 The Media 6.15 VII HUMAN RIGHTS: SPECIFIC GROUPS Race/Nationality 7.1 Hungarians and Croats in Vojvodina 7.4 Muslims in the Sandzak 7.8 Ethnic Albanians in Serbia 7.11 Roma 7.18 Mixed ethnicity 7.21 Freedom of Religion 7.26 continued Contents continued Paragraph Women 7.30 Children 7.33 Homosexuals 7.37 Military service : Amnesty etc 7.39 VIII OTHER ISSUES Health Service 8.1 Citizenship 8.4 Freedom of Movement 8.7 Repatriation 8.9 IX KOSOVO SECTION 9.1 X ANNEXES A - CHRONOLOGY B - POLITICAL PARTIES C - PROMINENT PEOPLE D - ABBREVIATIONS E - BIBLIOGRAPHY I INTRODUCTION 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most com monly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SERBS AGAINST the WEHRMACHT a History of World War Two in Yugoslavia Based on Previously Unknown German Documents
    Miloslav Samardzic THE SERBS AGAINST THE WEHRMACHT A History of World War Two in Yugoslavia Based on previously unknown German documents Translated by: Nebojsa Malic Kragujevac, 2018. CONTENTS Foreword: In Search of German Documents . .7 1. The 1941 uprising . .13 2. The Battle of Cer . .24 3. Operations “Ozren”, “Ozren 2“, “Bader-Ostbosnien” and “Trio” . .36 4. Other battles in 1942 . 44 5. Sabotage and diversions during the “Battle for Supplies” . .48 6. The “Gordon” group . .58 7. Operations until September 1943 . .61 8. A daily report from the German commander of Serbia . .71 9. Lim, Drina and the coast: Operations following the Italian Surrender . 73 10. Other operations through December 1943 . .79 11. Railway attacks in the fall of 1943 . .86 12. Battle of Višegrad . .93 13. Lim Bridge is Down . .107 14. Semeć Field . .112 15. Report by the 369th Division HQ on October 10, 1943 . 132 16. Breaking through the Jabuka-Mesići-Rogatica Line . 137 17. The Siege of Sarajevo . .154 18. Siege of Sarajevo Ends . .174 19. German Response to the Chetnik Offensive . .186 20. First half of 1944 . .190 21. Fourth Chetnik Offensive Against the Axis . .199 22. Chetnik-inflicted German Losses . .224 23. Analysis of German Losses: Chetniks vs. Partisans . .234 Documents and Photos . 113 Endnotes . .238 Sources . .250 About the Author . .253 Foreword: In Search of German Documents Anyone wishing to give an accurate description of combat operations by the Yugoslav Army in the Homeland (a.k.a. “Chet - niks“) faces two principal challenges. First, the need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that such operations took place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the United Nations
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 21, Issue 5 1997 Article 2 The Status of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the United Nations Vladislav Jovanovic∗ ∗ Copyright c 1997 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The Status of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the United Nations Vladislav Jovanovic Abstract The status and position of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (“FRY”) in the United Nations (“UN”) is a controversial issue which has elicited many comments and articles and has cast a long shadow on the legality of the measures taken by the General Assembly (“GA”) and the Security Council (“SC”) vis-a-vis Yugoslavia. In 1992, the SC and the GA both decided that the FRY, composed of Serbia and Montenegro, could not participate in the work of the GA and its bodies. The GA further extended the prohibition against Yugoslavian participation to the Economic and Social Council and its bodies. Throughout each of these resolutions, the SC and the GA stated that the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (“SFRY”) has ceased to exist and that the FRY cannot automatically continue the membership of the former SFRY in the UN. At the root of the unresolved status of the FRY in the UN is the question whether a succession or secession has taken place in the former SFRY. Essentially, the status question had been created by the unilateral acts of secession by the four former Yugoslav republics (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia) and the intrusion of the geo-strategic interests of foreign factors that encouraged, made possible and rewarded these secessions by premature recognition of the new nations.
    [Show full text]