COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 IRAQ COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 The aim of this vulnerability index is to understand the capacity of camps to deal with the impact of a COVID-19 outbreak, understanding the camp as a single system composed of sub-units. The components of the index are: exposure to risk, system vulnerabilities (population and infrastructure), capacity to cope with the event and its consequences, and finally, preparedness measures. For this purpose, databases collected between August 2019 and February 2020 have been analysed, as well as interviews with camp managers (see sources next to indicators), a total of 27 indicators were selected from those databases to compose the index. For purpose of comparing the situation on the different camps, the capacity and vulnerability is calculated for each camp in the country using the arithmetic average of all the IRAQ indicators (all indicators have the same weight). Those camps with a higher value are considered to be those that need to be strengthened in order to be prepared for an outbreak of COVID-19. Each indicator, according to its relevance and relation to the humanitarian standards, has been evaluated on a scale of 0 to 100 (see list of indicators and their individual assessment), with 100 being considered the most negative value with respect to the camp's capacity to deal with COVID-19. Overall Index Score (District Average*) Camp Population (District Sum) TURKEY TURKEY Zakho Zakho Al-Amadiya 46,362 Al-Amadiya 32 26 3,205 DUHOK Sumail DUHOK Sumail Al-Shikhan 83,965 Al-Shikhan Aqra 36 Aqra SYRIA 30 SYRIA 28,046 954 29 Al-Hamdaniya Al-Hamdaniya Al-Mosul ERBIL 30,883 ERBIL Al-Mosul 14 Erbil IRAN 31, IRAN Erbil NINEWA 23 21 NINEWA 831 Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Ramadi Makhmour 6,220 Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 21 28 2,793 9,114 24 34 AL-SULAYMANIYAH 452 559 AL-SULAYMANIYAH Kirkuk Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah 25 Al-Mada'in KIRKUK 22 345 Al-Mada'in KIRKUK Kirkuk 23 11,111 21 314 9,853 Al-Falluja Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar 32 32 3,942 224 Tikrit 25 Tikrit 1,189 19 740 SALAH SALAH Khanaqin Khanaqin 4,430 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 30 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 39 645 DIYALA DIYALA Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 24 34 452 559 Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD 14 - 20 AL-ANBAR 21 Al-Falluja Al-Mada'in AL-ANBAR 2,793 Al-Falluja 224 - 1,189 Al-Mahmoudiya 21 - 25 32 Al-Mahmoudiya 21 3,942 1,190 - 5,000 224 32 26 - 30 WASSIT 5,001 - 25,000 WASSIT Al-Hindiya Al-Hindiya 31 - 35 KERBALA KERBALA BABIL 39 BABIL 25,001 - 40,000 645 36 - 40 40,001 - 83,965 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. * The "district average" is based on a population-weighted average of the camp scores within the given district. Creation date: 04 May 2020 Sources: CCCM Cluster 2020 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/iraq www.reliefweb.int CCCM cluster: Marta Leboreiro Núñez [email protected] Kate Holland [email protected] IRAQ COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 Risk Index Score (District Average*) Vulnerability Index Score (District Average*) The Risk Index Score identifies risk of exposure of the camp population to COVID-19, through two Again understanding the camp as a single unit, vulnerability factors were critical indicators: If movement restrictions following the instruction of the Ministry of Health and identified through: demographics (incl. proportion of elderly population, Directorates of Health have been followed, and if humanitarian actors have adapted activities to persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses), Health and WASH avoid large gatherings, e.g. block-to-block distributions and social media mass communications. service access and infrastructure, and population density. Camps with, for IRAQ Most camps report compliance with these measures. Higher index number denotes higher exposure example, higher population density, proportion of elderly population, and risk. communal WASH facilities are scored as higher vulnerability. Camps in Dohuk and Ninewa are identified as having a higher comparative vulnerability. Higher index number denotes higher camp vulnerability level. TURKEY TURKEY Zakho Zakho 33 Al-Amadiya 0 Al-Amadiya 18 DUHOK 0 Sumail DUHOK Sumail Al-Shikhan Al-Shikhan Aqra 38 0 Aqra SYRIA 0 SYRIA 22 0 10 Al-Hamdaniya Al-Mosul Al-Hamdaniya ERBIL ERBIL Erbil IRAN Al-Mosul 21 Erbil IRAN 0 0 NINEWA 25 NINEWA 32 15 Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 25 25 4 26 25 25 AL-SULAYMANIYAH 14 9 AL-SULAYMANIYAH Kirkuk Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah 25 KIRKUK 25 8 KIRKUK Kirkuk Al-Mada'in 0 Al-Mada'in 23 12 Al-Falluja 25 Al-Falluja 7 Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar 25 25 Kalar 15 26 Tikrit Tikrit 10 25 0 2 SALAH SALAH Khanaqin Khanaqin Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 35 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 13 25 22 DIYALA DIYALA Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 25 25 14 9 Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD BAGHDAD 2 - 8 Al-Ramadi AL-ANBAR 25 Al-Falluja AL-ANBAR Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya 4 Al-Mahmoudiya 25 9 - 12 15 25 26 0 WASSIT 13 - 18 WASSIT Al-Hindiya Al-Hindiya 25 KERBALA 19 - 26 KERBALA 25 BABIL 22 BABIL 35 27 - 38 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. * The "district average" is based on a population-weighted average of the camp scores within the given district. Creation date: 04 May 2020 Sources: CCCM Cluster 2020 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/iraq www.reliefweb.int CCCM cluster: Marta Leboreiro Núñez [email protected] Kate Holland [email protected] IRAQ COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 Coping Capacity Index Score (District Average*) Preparedness Index Score (District Average*) This index considers at key aspects of Health and WASH services as a coping capacity of in case of Since the end of February, the humanitarian community in Iraq has put in COVID-19 outbreak, as well as looking at camp coping capacity for secondary consequences of the place preparedness and prevention measures in IDP camps. This index, situation including of movement restrictions, relating to food security and livelihoods. Higher index sourced from camp manager and WASH, Health, and CCCM partner number denotes lower coping capacity rating. reporting, captures the main actions taken including: mass communication IRAQ campaigns, hygiene item and PPE distributions, and capacity of CCCM teams to respond. Higher index number denotes lower preparedness rating. TURKEY Zakho TURKEY Zakho 25 Al-Amadiya 50 Al-Amadiya 25 50 Sumail DUHOK Sumail DUHOK 34 Al-Shikhan 50 Al-Shikhan Aqra Aqra SYRIA 33 SYRIA 50 47 50 Al-Hamdaniya ERBIL Al-Hamdaniya ERBIL Al-Mosul 11 Erbil IRAN Al-Mosul 10 Erbil IRAN NINEWA 23 27 NINEWA 17 21 Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 34 38 33 21 34 44 AL-SULAYMANIYAH 29 71 AL-SULAYMANIYAH Kirkuk Kirkuk Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah 44 KIRKUK 26 29 KIRKUK 33 Al-Mada'in 16 Al-Mada'in 42 31 29 Al-Falluja Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar 50 50 42 21 Tikrit 41 Tikrit 42 31 33 SALAH SALAH Khanaqin Khanaqin 54 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 35 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 53 58 DIYALA DIYALA Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 34 44 29 71 Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD 11 - 15 10 - 20 AL-ANBAR 34 Al-Falluja AL-ANBAR 33 Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Mahmoudiya 16 - 25 50 21 - 30 42 50 21 26 - 35 WASSIT 31 - 40 WASSIT Al-Hindiya Al-Hindiya 36 - 45 KERBALA 41 - 50 KERBALA 53 BABIL 58 BABIL 46 - 53 51 - 71 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. * The "district average" is based on a population-weighted average of the camp scores within the given district. Creation date: 04 May 2020 Sources: CCCM Cluster 2020 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/iraq www.reliefweb.int CCCM cluster: Marta Leboreiro Núñez [email protected] Kate Holland [email protected] IRAQ COVID -19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 Camp Risk Vulnerability Coping Capcity Preparedness Overall Snr. Governorate District Sub-District Camp Name SSID Population Index Score Index Score Index Score Index Score Index Score* 1 A n b a rF a l l u j a AAF 3 , 9 4 2 2 5 1 5 5 0 4 2 3 2 2 A n b a rR a m a d i HTC 2 , 7 9 3 2 5 4 3 4 3 3 2 1 3 Baghdad Al-Mada'in Al-Wihda Al-Nabi Younis IQ0707-0001 314 25 7 31 29 21 4 Baghdad Al-Kadhmiyah Al-Taji Al-Ahel IQ0701-0002 452 25 14 34 29 24 5 Baghdad Al-Risafa Baghdad Al-Jedeede Zayona IQ0707-0043 345 25 8 44 29 25 6 Baghdad Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Latifya Latifiya 1 IQ0706-0004 149 25 28 50 21 33 7 Baghdad Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Latifya Latifiya 2 IQ0706-0003 75 25 23 50 21 31 8 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Berseve 1 IQ0804-0001 7,266 0 14 25 50 24 9 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Berseve 2 IQ0804-0002 8,730 0 19 22 50 25 10 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Chamishku IQ0804-0003 26,426 0 43 25 50 36 11 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Darkar IQ0804-0290 3,940 0 28 31 50 32 12 Duhok Al-Amadiya Sarsink Dawadia IQ0801-0001 3,205 0 18 25 50 26 13 Ninewa Aqra Gerdaseen Mamilian IQ1501-0002 954 0 10 47 50 29 14 Duhok Sumail Sindi Kabarto 2 IQ0803-0003 13,713 0 28 38 50 34 15 Duhok Sumail Sindi Khanke IQ0803-0005 15,253 0 51 31 50 41 16 Duhok Sumail Al-Selvani Bajet Kandala IQ0803-0001 10,635 0 25 25 50 29 17 Duhok Sumail Al-Selvani Rwanga Community IQ0803-0004 14,284 0 42 41 50 40 18 Duhok Sumail Sindi Shariya IQ0803-0006 16,567 0 41 41 50 40 19 Duhok Sumail Sindi Kabarto
Recommended publications
  • Gurriculum Vitae
    حوكمةتا هةريَما كوردستانىَ – عرياق حكومت أقليم كودستان – العراق وزارة التعليم العالي والبحث العلمي وةزراتا خوندنا باﻻ وتوذينيَت زانستى رئاست جامعت بولينكنيك دهوك سةوركاتيا زانلويا ثوليتةكنيلا دهوك Kurdistan Regional Government-Iraq Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research Duhok Polytechnic University Curriculum Vitae University Address: 61 Zahko Road, 1006 Mazi Qt., Duhok , Kurdistan -Iraq A / Personal data Name: Mohammed Haydar Mosa Date of Birth: 1/1/1971 Place of Birth: Mosul City \ lraq Marital Status: Married Mother Tongue: Kurdish Other Language: Kurdish, English and Arabic Degree: M.Sc. Nursing from Nursing College/ Mosul University\ Iraq 2005 B\Educational University University Collage Degree Date (Year) Specialty Mosul Mosul Technical Technical Diploma 199 - 1993 Anesthesia Institute\Iraq Institute\Iraq Mosul College of Nursing B.SC 1994 - 1998 University Nursing Science Mosul College of Pediatric M.SC 2003 - 2005 University Nursing health nursing C\Training and education: Name ,Place , Country Type Years attended Academic degree obtained From To Tumor workshop \ Tumor 21/9/1996 - 29/9/1996 Training Mosul \Iraq nursing Second conference tumor Tumor 22/9/1996 - 24/9/1996 Training Of Mosul \Iraq Course & methods to teach public health\ Community 12 October 2004 Training Community health health nursing - 15 October 2004 nursing \ Duhok \ Iraq Cardiac catheterization Cardiac \ Azadi teaching 2007 Training catheterization hospital \Duhok\ Iraq Methods of education Methods of \Duhok Technical 4/7/2009 - 18/7/2006 education institute \Iraq Evaluation of health Environmental states At health Institutions In 7th scientific conference conference 27-28 September 2010 Iraq. Mosul proceedings university\Nursing collage The role of Scientific research in Developing 10th National scientific of public health .
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Opposition to the Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)
    Country Policy and Information Note Iraq: Opposition to the government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Version 2.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • COI Note on the Situation of Yazidi Idps in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq
    COI Note on the Situation of Yazidi IDPs in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq May 20191 Contents 1) Access to the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KR-I) ................................................................... 2 2) Humanitarian / Socio-Economic Situation in the KR-I ..................................................... 2 a) Shelter ........................................................................................................................................ 3 b) Employment .............................................................................................................................. 4 c) Education ................................................................................................................................... 6 d) Mental Health ............................................................................................................................ 8 e) Humanitarian Assistance ...................................................................................................... 10 3) Returns to Sinjar District........................................................................................................ 10 In August 2014, the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) seized the districts of Sinjar, Tel Afar and the Ninewa Plains, leading to a mass exodus of Yazidis, Christians and other religious communities from these areas. Soon, reports began to surface regarding war crimes and serious human rights violations perpetrated by ISIS and associated armed groups. These included the systematic
    [Show full text]
  • IRAQ: Humanitarian Operational Presence (3W) for HRP and Non-HRP Activities January to June 2021
    IRAQ: Humanitarian Operational Presence (3W) for HRP and Non-HRP Activities January to June 2021 TURKEY 26 Zakho Number of partners by cluster DUHOK Al-Amadiya 11 3 Sumail Duhok 17 27 33 Rawanduz Al-Shikhan Aqra Telafar 18 ERBIL 40 Tilkaef 4 23 8 Sinjar Shaqlawa 57 4 Pshdar Al-Hamdaniya Al-Mosul 4 Rania 1 NINEWA 37 Erbil Koysinjaq 23 Dokan 1 Makhmour 2 Al-Baaj 15 Sharbazher 16 Dibis 9 24 Al-Hatra 20 Al-Shirqat KIRKUK Kirkuk Al-Sulaymaniyah 15 6 SYRIA Al-Hawiga Chamchamal 21 Halabcha 18 19 6 2 Daquq Beygee 16 12 Tooz Kalar Tikrit Khurmato 12 8 2 11 SALAH AL-DIN Kifri Al-Daur Ana 2 6 Al-Kaim 7 Samarra 15 13 Haditha Al-Khalis IRAN 3 7 Balad 12 Al-Muqdadiya Heet 9 DIYALA 7 Baquba 10 4 Baladruz Al-Kadhmiyah 5 1 Al-Ramadi 9 Al-Mada'in 1 AL-ANBAR Al-Falluja 24 28 Al-Mahmoudiya Badra 3 8 Al-Suwaira Al-Mussyab JORDAN Al-Rutba 2 1 WASSIT 2 KERBALA Al-Mahaweel 3 Al-Kut Kerbela 1 BABIL 5 2 Al-Hashimiya 3 1 2 Al-Kufa 3 Al-Diwaniya Afaq 2 MAYSAN Al-Manathera 1 1 Al-Rifai Al-Hamza AL-NAJAF Al-Rumaitha 1 1 Al-Shatra * Total number of unique partners reported under the HRP 2020, HRP 2021 and other non-HRP plans Al-Najaf 2 Al-Khidhir THI QAR 2 7 Al-Nasiriya 1 Al-Qurna Suq 1 1 2 Shat 119 Partners Al-Shoyokh 3 Al-Arab Providing humanitarian assistance from January to June Al-Basrah 3 2021 for humanitarian activities under the HRP 2021, HRP 2020 AL-BASRAH Abu SAUDI ARABIA AL-MUTHANNA 4 1 other non-HRP programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region
    KURDISTAN RISING? CONSIDERATIONS FOR KURDS, THEIR NEIGHBORS, AND THE REGION Michael Rubin AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region Michael Rubin June 2016 American Enterprise Institute © 2016 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20036 www.aei.org. Cover image: Grand Millennium Sualimani Hotel in Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, by Diyar Muhammed, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons. Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Who Are the Kurds? 5 2. Is This Kurdistan’s Moment? 19 3. What Do the Kurds Want? 27 4. What Form of Government Will Kurdistan Embrace? 56 5. Would Kurdistan Have a Viable Economy? 64 6. Would Kurdistan Be a State of Law? 91 7. What Services Would Kurdistan Provide Its Citizens? 101 8. Could Kurdistan Defend Itself Militarily and Diplomatically? 107 9. Does the United States Have a Coherent Kurdistan Policy? 119 Notes 125 Acknowledgments 137 About the Author 139 iii Executive Summary wo decades ago, most US officials would have been hard-pressed Tto place Kurdistan on a map, let alone consider Kurds as allies. Today, Kurds have largely won over Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosul Response Dashboard 20 Aug 2017
    UNHCR Mosul Emergency Response Since October 2016 23 August 2017 UNHCR Co-coordinated Clusters: 1,089,564 displaced since 17 October 2016 Camp/Site Plots Tents Complete + of whom 838,608 are NFI Kits WƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ƐƟůůĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJĚŝƐƉůĂĐĞĚ & ;ŽͲĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚďLJhE,ZΘZͿ Targets:44,000 60,000 87,500 ƐƐŝƐƚĞĚďLJhE,Z KĐĐƵƉŝĞĚ DistribƵted 8,931 10,586 SŚĞůƚĞƌΘE&/ 8,931 3,360 (Co-coordinated ďLJhE,ZΘEZͿ 454,098 144,703 20,576 16,849 ( 17,294 16,398 ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ Developed Plots Available assisted assisted Camp ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶΘ 34,671 73,554 ĂŵƉDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ in camps ŽƵƚŽĨĐĂŵƉƐ 6,187 34,220 /ŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐŽŶŇŝĐƚͲĂīĞĐƚĞĚ EĞǁƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ EĞǁƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ! ;ŽͲĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚďLJhE,ZΘ/KDͿ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶǁŚŽǁĞƌĞ ŶĞǀĞƌĚŝƐƉůĂĐĞĚ in 2017 in 2017 Derkar dhZ<z Batifa 20km UNHCR Protection Monitoring for Mosul Response Zakho Amadiya Amedi Soran Mergasur Dahuk Ü 47,478 HHs Assessed Sumel Dahuk ^zZ/EZ 212,978 IndividƵals ZWh>/ DAHUK Akre Choman Mosul Dam Lake Shikhan Soran Choman Amalla ISLADIC Mosul Dam Nargizlia 1 B Nargizlia 2 ZEPUBLIC Tilkaif B Telafar Zelikan (n(new) OF IZAN QaymawaQ (Zelikan) B Shaqlawa 58,954 60,881 48,170 44,973 NINEWA HamdaniyaHdHamdaddaa iyaiyyay Al Hol HasanshamHaasasanshams U2 campp MosulMosuMosMooosssuulul HasanshamHasansham U3 Rania BartellaBartelllalaB B Pshdar Mosul BBBHhM2Hasanshamaanshnnssh M2 KhazerKhazehaha M1 Plots in UNHCR Constructed Camps Sinjar BChamakorChamakor As Salamiyah S y Erbil Hammamammama Al-AlilAlil 2 Al Salamiyah 2 DUKAN Occupied Plots Developed Plots Undeveloped Plots BB B RESERVOIR HammamHammH AAlAl-Alil Alil Erbil B Al ^alamiyaŚ
    [Show full text]
  • Doh Duhok IMC STLI Doh Ninewa Shingal Azad MSF-Swis
    Minutes Meeting Health Cluster Wednesday 24 May 2017, Duhok Participants: DoH Duhok IMC STLI DoH Ninewa Shingal Azad MSF-Swiss UNHCR PUI MEDAIR WHO MdM PWJ WFP UNFPA ICRC STEP IN Capni IOM Heevie Organization Malteser International GIZ UNDP Dorcas Elise Care BRHA DoH Ninewa: Dr. Laith: The bridge in Mosul is repaired. In the old city of Mosul 200.000 are trapped. Expectation is that they will need a lot of services. TSP is needed near the bridge. There is a need to create a plan how to regulate the flow of IDPs o camps. This bridge can be used for the transferring displeased people to Duhok’s area because as he said may there will be displeased people or patients if the liberation starts from all the cities, the nearest hospital (Al- Khansaa) only have 150 beds and it’s not enough, so we have to prepare to increase the capacity of the in- patients and to establish a TSP near the bridge. The Mosul DG’s requests is that there is only 14 beds in Al- Khansaa hospital so we want to increase the capacity of ICU by the help of the partners. Regarding PHCs we need sonar and ECGs Machines, also we have a shortage of X- Ray films and syringe. Dr. Laith is explaining that the letter of the minister of Health in Bagdag regarding the recall of staff is being discussed with the deputy of MoH Bagdad. The content of the letter is not implemented at this moment by DoH Ninewa DoH Duhok: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Christians Last The
    THE THE LAST CHRISTIANS ANDREAS Stories of Persecution, Flight, AND KNAPP Resilience in the Middle East The Last Christians Stories of Persecution, Flight, and Resilience in the Middle East Andreas Knapp Translated by Sharon Howe This is a preview. Get the entire book here. Plough Publishing House Published by Plough Publishing House Walden, New York Robertsbridge, England Elsmore, Australia www.plough.com Copyright © 2017 by Plough Publishing House All rights reserved. PRINT ISBN: 978-0-87486-062-7 EPUB ISBN: 978-0-87486-070-2 MOBI ISBN: 978-0-87486-071-9 PDF ISBN: 978-0-87486-073-3 This is a preview. Get the entire book here. Contents Preface: Giving a Voice to the Voiceless ix 1. Looking Death in the Eye 1 2. Please Help Us! 8 3. A Graveside Reunion 18 4. Last Respects 25 5. A Waiting Game 41 6. When They Persecute You 52 7. A Life’s Work in Ruins 58 8. A Bishop in Exile 71 9. Nothing New under the Crescent Moon 86 10. Within Sight of the Islamic State 98 11. The Decline of the Christian Middle East 107 12. A Rocket in the Roof 122 13. Garo’s Odyssey 133 14. Remembrance Is the Secret of Redemption 145 15. The Death of a Language 158 16. Through a Child’s Eyes 171 17. Blessed Are the Meek 181 18. Easter Comes Early 193 19. Giving of Our Best 207 Epilogue: The Gift of Home 220 This is a preview. Get the entire book here. Lake Van TURKEY Van Siirt Diyarbakir T Tigris u r Urmia Euphrates A bdin Lake Mardin Urmia Adana Gaziantep Nusaybin Qamishli Zakho Duhok Hassake Mar Mattai Antioch Mosul Ankawa (Antakya) Sinjar Aleppo Raqqa Qaraqosh Erbil Khabur Deir ez-Zor IRAQ Kirkuk Homs Tigris Mediterranean SYRIA Sea Palmyra IRAN LEBANON Deir Mar Elian Beirut Ma’loula Euphrates Damascus Baghdad Seleucia-Ctesiphon ISRAEL Jerusalem Amman Najaf Bethlehem JORDAN This is a preview.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Rates
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Mapping Poverty inIraq Mapping Poverty Where are Iraq’s Poor: Poor: Iraq’s are Where Acknowledgements This work was led by Tara Vishwanath (Lead Economist, GPVDR) with a core team comprising Dhiraj Sharma (ETC, GPVDR), Nandini Krishnan (Senior Economist, GPVDR), and Brian Blankespoor (Environment Specialist, DECCT). We are grateful to Dr. Mehdi Al-Alak (Chair of the Poverty Reduction Strategy High Committee and Deputy Minister of Planning), Ms. Najla Ali Murad (Executive General Manager of the Poverty Reduction Strategy), Mr. Serwan Mohamed (Director, KRSO), and Mr. Qusay Raoof Abdulfatah (Liv- ing Conditions Statistics Director, CSO) for their commitment and dedication to the project. We also acknowledge the contribution on the draft report of the members of Poverty Technical High Committee of the Government of Iraq, representatives from academic institutions, the Ministry of Planning, Education and Social Affairs, and colleagues from the Central Statistics Office and the Kurdistan Region Statistics during the Beirut workshop in October 2014. We are thankful to our peer reviewers - Kenneth Simler (Senior Economist, GPVDR) and Nobuo Yoshida (Senior Economist, GPVDR) – for their valuable comments. Finally, we acknowledge the support of TACBF Trust Fund for financing a significant part of the work and the support and encouragement of Ferid Belhaj (Country Director, MNC02), Robert Bou Jaoude (Country Manager, MNCIQ), and Pilar
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Displacement Crisis
    CEASEFIRE centre for civilian rights Lahib Higel Iraq’s Displacement Crisis: Security and protection © Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights and Minority Rights Group International March 2016 Cover photo: This report has been produced as part of the Ceasefire project, a multi-year pro- gramme supported by the European Union to implement a system of civilian-led An Iraqi boy watches as internally- displaced Iraq families return to their monitoring of human rights abuses in Iraq, focusing in particular on the rights of homes in the western Melhaniyeh vulnerable civilians including vulnerable women, internally-displaced persons (IDPs), neighbourhood of Baghdad in stateless persons, and ethnic or religious minorities, and to assess the feasibility of September 2008. Some 150 Shi’a and Sunni families returned after an extending civilian-led monitoring to other country situations. earlier wave of displacement some two years before when sectarian This report has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union violence escalated and families fled and the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada. The con- to neighbourhoods where their sect was in the majority. tents of this report are the sole responsibility of the publishers and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. © Ahmad Al-Rubaye /AFP / Getty Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights The Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights is a new initiative to develop ‘civilian-led monitoring’ of violations of international humanitarian law or human rights, to pursue legal and political accountability for those responsible for such violations, and to develop the practice of civilian rights.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAQ Humanitarian Access Severity Overview (November 2020)
    IRAQ Humanitarian Access Severity Overview (November 2020) DISTRICT ACCESS SEVERITY AS PERCEIVED UN BY HUMANITARIAN ACTORS TURKEY In October 2020, OCHA conducted an Access Severity monitoring Duhok exercise consisting of focus groups discussions (FGDs) with UN agencies, and international and national non-government organizations (NGOs). The monitoring exercise aimed to Erbil determine humanitarian actors’ perceptions of access constraints in all districts in central and northern Iraqi Ninewa governorates. The focus group discussions found that 47 per Al-Sulaymaniyah cent of districts covered by the HRP had moderate to high levels SYRIA Kirkuk of access difficulties. The districts with the highest access restrictions (28 of 60) mostly fall within the central and northern Salah Al-Din governorates of Anbar, Baghdad, Diyala, Kirkuk, Ninewa and Salah Al-Din. IRAN INGO Diyala Although the access environment in Iraq remains difficult, discussion participants indicated a general improvement in district-level access conditions compared to April 2020. Baghdad Al-Anbar Previously, in April, humanitarian access had significantly JORDAN deteriorated in Iraq compared to access conditions at the end of Wassit 2019. However, district-level humanitarian access has generally Kerbala Babil improved since then, as COVID-19 restrictions such as curfews were lifted or relaxed and the government reestablished the Maysan Al-Qadissiya Al-Najaf access authorization mechanism for granting access to NGOs Thi Qar operating in federal areas in September 2020. SAUDI ARABIA Al-Muthanna NNGO LEGEND Districts where COVID-19 related restrictions have impacted humanitarian operations Accessible / Low access constraints (Level 1): Relatively few access constraints. Armed actors, checkpoints, or other impediments such as administrative obstacles may be present and may impede humanitarian activities.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAQ: Camp Closure Status Date: 16 November 2020
    IRAQ: Camp Closure Status Date: 16 November 2020 Departures Initial Governorate District Site Name1 Site Type Status2 (individuals) Population Khazer Camp T U RKE Y Al-Anbar Al-Falluja HTC *** Informal Site closed 887 2,505 Al-Anbar Al-Falluja AAF Camp Closure paused ** 3,884 Zakho Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Sulaymaniyah Arbat IDP Camp No closure announced * 1,395 As Salamyiah 2 Camp Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Sulaymaniyah Ashti IDP Camp No closure announced * 8,957 Al-Amadiya Al-Sulaymaniyah Kalar Tazade Camp Closure paused ** 1,120 Sumail Al-Zibar Hamam Al Alil 2 Camp IRA N Baghdad Al-Kadhmiyah Al-Shams Informal Site closed 612 510 Baghdad Al-Kadhmiyah Al-Ahel Camp Site closed 345 345 Aqra Rawanduz Telafar Baghdad Al-Mada'in Al-Nabi Younis Camp Site closed 270 270 Informal Site Tilkaef Baghdad Al-Mahmoudiya Latifiya 1 Camp No closure announced * 119 Al-Shikhan Baghdad Al-Mahmoudiya Latifiya 2 Camp No closure announced * 56 Shaqlawa Sinjar Al-Hamdaniya Baghdad Al-Risafa Zayona *** Informal No closure announced * 361 Pshdar Qayyarah-Jad'ah 5 Camp Ninewa Erbil Rania Diyala Baquba Muskar Saad Camp Camp Site closed 500 500 Al-Mosul Yahyawa Camp Diyala Khanaqin Al-Wand 2 Camp Site closed 661 668 Erbil Koysinjaq Diyala Khanaqin Al-Wand 1 Camp Under closure 923 2,162 Qayyarah-Jad'ah 1 Camp Diyala Khanaqin Qoratu Camp Closure paused ** 662 Dokan Laylan 1 Camp Duhok Al-Amadiya Dawadia Camp No closure announced * 2,941 Panjwin Sharbazher Duhok Sumail Bajet Kandala Camp No closure announced * 9,705 Dibis Duhok Sumail Rwanga Community Camp No closure announced
    [Show full text]