IRAQ COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 The aim of this vulnerability index is to understand the capacity of camps to deal with the impact of a COVID-19 outbreak, understanding the camp as a single system composed of sub-units. The components of the index are: exposure to risk, system vulnerabilities (population and infrastructure), capacity to cope with the event and its consequences, and finally, preparedness measures. For this purpose, databases collected between August 2019 and February 2020 have been analysed, as well as interviews with camp managers (see sources next to indicators), a total of 27 indicators were selected from those databases to compose the index. For purpose of comparing the situation on the different camps, the capacity and vulnerability is calculated for each camp in the country using the arithmetic average of all the IRAQ indicators (all indicators have the same weight). Those camps with a higher value are considered to be those that need to be strengthened in order to be prepared for an outbreak of COVID-19. Each indicator, according to its relevance and relation to the humanitarian standards, has been evaluated on a scale of 0 to 100 (see list of indicators and their individual assessment), with 100 being considered the most negative value with respect to the camp's capacity to deal with COVID-19. Overall Index Score (District Average*) Camp Population (District Sum) TURKEY TURKEY Zakho Zakho Al-Amadiya 46,362 Al-Amadiya 32 26 3,205 DUHOK Sumail DUHOK Sumail Al-Shikhan 83,965 Al-Shikhan Aqra 36 Aqra SYRIA 30 SYRIA 28,046 954 29 Al-Hamdaniya Al-Hamdaniya Al-Mosul ERBIL 30,883 ERBIL Al-Mosul 14 Erbil IRAN 31, IRAN Erbil NINEWA 23 21 NINEWA 831 Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Ramadi Makhmour 6,220 Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 21 28 2,793 9,114 24 34 AL-SULAYMANIYAH 452 559 AL-SULAYMANIYAH Kirkuk Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah 25 Al-Mada'in KIRKUK 22 345 Al-Mada'in KIRKUK Kirkuk 23 11,111 21 314 9,853 Al-Falluja Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar 32 32 3,942 224 Tikrit 25 Tikrit 1,189 19 740 SALAH SALAH Khanaqin Khanaqin 4,430 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 30 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 39 645 DIYALA DIYALA Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 24 34 452 559 Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD 14 - 20 AL-ANBAR 21 Al-Falluja Al-Mada'in AL-ANBAR 2,793 Al-Falluja 224 - 1,189 Al-Mahmoudiya 21 - 25 32 Al-Mahmoudiya 21 3,942 1,190 - 5,000 224 32 26 - 30 WASSIT 5,001 - 25,000 WASSIT Al-Hindiya Al-Hindiya 31 - 35 KERBALA KERBALA BABIL 39 BABIL 25,001 - 40,000 645 36 - 40 40,001 - 83,965 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. * The "district average" is based on a population-weighted average of the camp scores within the given district. Creation date: 04 May 2020 Sources: CCCM Cluster 2020 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/iraq www.reliefweb.int CCCM cluster: Marta Leboreiro Núñez [email protected] Kate Holland [email protected] IRAQ COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 Risk Index Score (District Average*) Vulnerability Index Score (District Average*) The Risk Index Score identifies risk of exposure of the camp population to COVID-19, through two Again understanding the camp as a single unit, vulnerability factors were critical indicators: If movement restrictions following the instruction of the Ministry of Health and identified through: demographics (incl. proportion of elderly population, Directorates of Health have been followed, and if humanitarian actors have adapted activities to persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses), Health and WASH avoid large gatherings, e.g. block-to-block distributions and social media mass communications. service access and infrastructure, and population density. Camps with, for IRAQ Most camps report compliance with these measures. Higher index number denotes higher exposure example, higher population density, proportion of elderly population, and risk. communal WASH facilities are scored as higher vulnerability. Camps in Dohuk and Ninewa are identified as having a higher comparative vulnerability. Higher index number denotes higher camp vulnerability level. TURKEY TURKEY Zakho Zakho 33 Al-Amadiya 0 Al-Amadiya 18 DUHOK 0 Sumail DUHOK Sumail Al-Shikhan Al-Shikhan Aqra 38 0 Aqra SYRIA 0 SYRIA 22 0 10 Al-Hamdaniya Al-Mosul Al-Hamdaniya ERBIL ERBIL Erbil IRAN Al-Mosul 21 Erbil IRAN 0 0 NINEWA 25 NINEWA 32 15 Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 25 25 4 26 25 25 AL-SULAYMANIYAH 14 9 AL-SULAYMANIYAH Kirkuk Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah 25 KIRKUK 25 8 KIRKUK Kirkuk Al-Mada'in 0 Al-Mada'in 23 12 Al-Falluja 25 Al-Falluja 7 Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar 25 25 Kalar 15 26 Tikrit Tikrit 10 25 0 2 SALAH SALAH Khanaqin Khanaqin Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 35 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 13 25 22 DIYALA DIYALA Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 25 25 14 9 Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD BAGHDAD 2 - 8 Al-Ramadi AL-ANBAR 25 Al-Falluja AL-ANBAR Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya 4 Al-Mahmoudiya 25 9 - 12 15 25 26 0 WASSIT 13 - 18 WASSIT Al-Hindiya Al-Hindiya 25 KERBALA 19 - 26 KERBALA 25 BABIL 22 BABIL 35 27 - 38 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. * The "district average" is based on a population-weighted average of the camp scores within the given district. Creation date: 04 May 2020 Sources: CCCM Cluster 2020 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/iraq www.reliefweb.int CCCM cluster: Marta Leboreiro Núñez [email protected] Kate Holland [email protected] IRAQ COVID-19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 Coping Capacity Index Score (District Average*) Preparedness Index Score (District Average*) This index considers at key aspects of Health and WASH services as a coping capacity of in case of Since the end of February, the humanitarian community in Iraq has put in COVID-19 outbreak, as well as looking at camp coping capacity for secondary consequences of the place preparedness and prevention measures in IDP camps. This index, situation including of movement restrictions, relating to food security and livelihoods. Higher index sourced from camp manager and WASH, Health, and CCCM partner number denotes lower coping capacity rating. reporting, captures the main actions taken including: mass communication IRAQ campaigns, hygiene item and PPE distributions, and capacity of CCCM teams to respond. Higher index number denotes lower preparedness rating. TURKEY Zakho TURKEY Zakho 25 Al-Amadiya 50 Al-Amadiya 25 50 Sumail DUHOK Sumail DUHOK 34 Al-Shikhan 50 Al-Shikhan Aqra Aqra SYRIA 33 SYRIA 50 47 50 Al-Hamdaniya ERBIL Al-Hamdaniya ERBIL Al-Mosul 11 Erbil IRAN Al-Mosul 10 Erbil IRAN NINEWA 23 27 NINEWA 17 21 Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Ramadi Makhmour Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 34 38 33 21 34 44 AL-SULAYMANIYAH 29 71 AL-SULAYMANIYAH Kirkuk Kirkuk Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah Al-Risafa Al-Sulaymaniyah 44 KIRKUK 26 29 KIRKUK 33 Al-Mada'in 16 Al-Mada'in 42 31 29 Al-Falluja Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar Al-Mahmoudiya Kalar 50 50 42 21 Tikrit 41 Tikrit 42 31 33 SALAH SALAH Khanaqin Khanaqin 54 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 35 Al-Hindiya AL-DIN 53 58 DIYALA DIYALA Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba Al-Kadhmiyah Baquba 34 44 29 71 Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD Al-Ramadi BAGHDAD 11 - 15 10 - 20 AL-ANBAR 34 Al-Falluja AL-ANBAR 33 Al-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Mahmoudiya 16 - 25 50 21 - 30 42 50 21 26 - 35 WASSIT 31 - 40 WASSIT Al-Hindiya Al-Hindiya 36 - 45 KERBALA 41 - 50 KERBALA 53 BABIL 58 BABIL 46 - 53 51 - 71 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. * The "district average" is based on a population-weighted average of the camp scores within the given district. Creation date: 04 May 2020 Sources: CCCM Cluster 2020 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/iraq www.reliefweb.int CCCM cluster: Marta Leboreiro Núñez [email protected] Kate Holland [email protected] IRAQ COVID -19 Camp Vulnerability Index As of 04 May 2020 Camp Risk Vulnerability Coping Capcity Preparedness Overall Snr. Governorate District Sub-District Camp Name SSID Population Index Score Index Score Index Score Index Score Index Score* 1 A n b a rF a l l u j a AAF 3 , 9 4 2 2 5 1 5 5 0 4 2 3 2 2 A n b a rR a m a d i HTC 2 , 7 9 3 2 5 4 3 4 3 3 2 1 3 Baghdad Al-Mada'in Al-Wihda Al-Nabi Younis IQ0707-0001 314 25 7 31 29 21 4 Baghdad Al-Kadhmiyah Al-Taji Al-Ahel IQ0701-0002 452 25 14 34 29 24 5 Baghdad Al-Risafa Baghdad Al-Jedeede Zayona IQ0707-0043 345 25 8 44 29 25 6 Baghdad Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Latifya Latifiya 1 IQ0706-0004 149 25 28 50 21 33 7 Baghdad Al-Mahmoudiya Al-Latifya Latifiya 2 IQ0706-0003 75 25 23 50 21 31 8 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Berseve 1 IQ0804-0001 7,266 0 14 25 50 24 9 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Berseve 2 IQ0804-0002 8,730 0 19 22 50 25 10 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Chamishku IQ0804-0003 26,426 0 43 25 50 36 11 Duhok Zakho Al-Sindi Darkar IQ0804-0290 3,940 0 28 31 50 32 12 Duhok Al-Amadiya Sarsink Dawadia IQ0801-0001 3,205 0 18 25 50 26 13 Ninewa Aqra Gerdaseen Mamilian IQ1501-0002 954 0 10 47 50 29 14 Duhok Sumail Sindi Kabarto 2 IQ0803-0003 13,713 0 28 38 50 34 15 Duhok Sumail Sindi Khanke IQ0803-0005 15,253 0 51 31 50 41 16 Duhok Sumail Al-Selvani Bajet Kandala IQ0803-0001 10,635 0 25 25 50 29 17 Duhok Sumail Al-Selvani Rwanga Community IQ0803-0004 14,284 0 42 41 50 40 18 Duhok Sumail Sindi Shariya IQ0803-0006 16,567 0 41 41 50 40 19 Duhok Sumail Sindi Kabarto