EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION and CARE POLICY REVIEW NORWAY Arno Engel, W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION and CARE POLICY REVIEW NORWAY Arno Engel, W EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE POLICY REVIEW NORWAY Arno Engel, W. Steven Barnett, Yvonne Anders and Miho Taguma EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE POLICY REVIEW NORWAY Arno Engel, W. Steven Barnett, Yvonne Anders and Miho Taguma This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Photo credits: © Khamidulin Sergey/Shutterstock.com You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. FOREWORD – 3 Foreword Norway participated in the OECD Thematic Review of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in 1999. Since then, Norway has undertaken major policy reforms in ECEC in particular to expand access and improve quality in ECEC. For 2014, Norway decided to have the changed systems reviewed by the OECD team. Thus, the purpose of this Review is to explore how the ECEC systems have changed since 1999, to review the effectiveness of the changes made, and to investigate what are the most effective, relevant and feasible policy options to further improve access and quality in its ECEC system. To this end it delivers an independent analysis of major issues in the areas of governance, funding, access and, in particular, quality of kindergarten provision in Norway, looking at past and present policy initiatives, and potential approaches for the future. The report serves to provide insights and advice to the Norwegian kindergarten authorities at all levels of government, practitioners and stakeholders, helping them to ensure high quality in all kindergartens, give even more children access to a place in a kindergarten and ensure good governance appropriate for today’s and future kindergartens. The report is also intended to help other OECD member and non-member economies to understand the Norwegian ECEC systems. This report forms part of the project “Review of policies and practices for monitoring quality in early learning and development”. In addition to the country review strand, Norway contributed to the data development and monitoring quality strands of this work. Accordingly, key findings from those strands are also included in the present review report. The review was conducted based on two visits: a fact-finding mission and a policy review mission. The members of the fact-finding mission included: Miho Taguma (OECD Secretariat, ECEC project manager), Arno Engel (OECD Secretariat, co- ordinator of the Review), W. Steven Barnett (Director, NIEER, Rutgers University), Christa Preissing (Director, Berliner Kita-Institut für Qualitätsentwicklung - BeKi) and Mugyeong Moon (OECD Secretariat, seconded from Korea Institute of Child Care and Education). The members of the policy review mission included: Miho Taguma, Arno Engel, W. Steven Barnett, Christa Preissing and Masafumi Ishikawa (OECD Secretariat, seconded from Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology). The report was prepared under the leadership of and reviewed by Miho Taguma. The main authors are Arno Engel, W. Steven Barnett and Yvonne Anders (Professor, Department of Early Childhood Education at Freie Universität Berlin). The Secretariat provided extensive information, analysis and discussion in regard to ECEC governance, policies, provision and financing as well as the two key areas of the review, access and quality. Research assistance was provided by Christa Crusius (OECD Secretariat), Elizabeth Adamson (University of New South Wales) and Ana Sushac (Freie Universität Berlin). The report also benefitted from the comments and assistance of Ineke Litjens, Étienne Albiser, Paul O'Brien and Isabelle Chatry (OECD Secretariat). Administrative support was provided by Claude Annie Manga Collard and Kelly Makowiecki. Sophie Limoges helped with finalising the publication. Editorial support was provided by Sally Hinchcliffe. The layout was prepared by Liz Zachary. EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE POLICY REVIEW: NORWAY © OECD 2015 4 - FOREWORD Norway’s involvement in the OECD Review was co-ordinated by Ms. Tove Mogstad Slinde and Ms. Aase Birgitte Gimnes, Senior Advisers, Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. A key part of Norway’s preparation was the crafting of a comprehensive and informative Country Background Report (CBR) on its Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) system and policies, published by the Ministry of Education and Research jointly with the present report. The review team is highly indebted to the authors of the CBR, and to all those who supported them with providing such a comprehensive and informative report. The CBR is an important output from the review process in its own right as well as the main starting point and resource for the review team. The CBR is referenced as “Ministry of Education and Research, 2015” throughout this report. The CBR follows the questionnaire and guidelines prepared by the OECD. This report and the CBR should be read together so that the readers could gain a full picture of the Norwegian policy contexts and be able to triangulate the policy issues between the reader’s own assessment, the internal assessment by the Norwegian authority and the external assessment by the OECD review team. The fact-finding mission took place on 10-13 June 2014, including visits to Oslo, Drammen and Hole. The policy review visit took place on 9-15 September 2014 and covered visits to Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø and Kåfjord. The itineraries for both visits are provided in Annex A. The visits were planned jointly by the OECD Secretariat and the Norwegian authorities. During the review visit, the team held discussions with a wide range of national, regional and local authorities; officials from the Ministry of Education and Research. Those meetings and visits sought to provide a broad perspective on ECEC policies and practices in Norway. The review team is extremely grateful for the insightful discussions, helpful comments and explanations and the time dedicated to the review by the various people it had the pleasure to meet. Our special thanks goes to Ms. Tove Mogstad Slinde and Ms. Aase Gimnes who shared their expertise and answered the never-ending questions of the review team throughout the two visits. Thanks to the hospitality of all Norwegian stakeholders, the visits were inspiring and, due to the wealth of information received, intellectually challenging but enjoyable. This report is organised in three chapters. Chapter 1 provides the national context, with information on Norway's demography, welfare state, education policies and key reforms. Chapter 2 looks at governance, funding and access with strengths, challenges and policy recommendations for all areas. Lastly, Chapter 3, the main chapter of the report, focuses on quality in the area of workforce, standards and regulations, monitoring and research, again identifying strengths, challenges and suggesting policy recommendations. EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE POLICY REVIEW: NORWAY © OECD 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS – 5 Table of contents List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 9 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 National context and overview of early childhood education and care ..................... 13 The Norwegian context: Political system, geography and demography .......................................... 14 Social and education policy context ................................................................................................ 15 ECEC reforms and policy trends in Norway ................................................................................... 19 Chapter 2 Ensuring access through effective governance and funding ....................................... 25 Key messages ................................................................................................................................... 26 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Strengths, challenges and policy recommendations ..................................................................... 28 Governing and financing kindergartens ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Opplevelseskartgrorud
    OPPLEVELSESKART GRORUD–ellingsrUD Alna, grønnstruktur, idrett og kulturmiljø 1 Spesielle natur- og kulturmiljøer ALNA, HØLALØKKA OG ALNAPARKEN Alna er en del av Alnavassdraget, som er 17 km langt og et av Oslos 10 vassdrag. Vassdraget er omkranset av frodig og rik vegetasjon, med gode leveområder for dyr, fugler og planter. Langs vassdraget har man funnet 10 patte- dyrarter, 57 fuglearter, 2 amfibiearter, 370 kar- planter og 400 sopparter. Alnas hovedkilde er Alnsjøen i Lillomarka. Hølaløkka ble opparbeidet i 2004 med gjenåpning av Alnaelva og en dam. Økologiske prinsipper er lagt til grunn for utforming av prosjektet med stedegne arter, oppbygning av kantsoner og rensing av overvann. Alnaparken ble etablert i 1998 og er utviklet med mange aktivitetsmuligheter. GRORUDDAMMEN OG TIDLIG Området inneholder bl.a. turveier, to fotball- INDUSTRIVIRKSOMHET baner, sandvolleyballbane, frisbeegolfbane, Alnavassdraget var avgjørende for industri- ridesenter og en dam med amfibier. Området utviklingen på Grorud. I 1867 ble Lerfossen har mange forskjellige vegetasjonstyper, blant Klædefabrikk anlagt ved fossen av samme navn. annet en del gråor- og heggeskog. Enkelte Virksomheten skiftet siden navn til Grorud sjeldne sopparter er funnet i området. Klædefabrikk, og deretter Grorud Textilfabrikker. Groruddammen ble anlagt i 1870-årene som en del av industrianlegget. Like ved demningen ligger en tidligere shoddyfabrikk som drev gjen- vinning av ullmateriale fra opprevne ullfiller. Fabrikkbygningen står fremdeles, men har fått et nyere tilbygg mot turveien. Groruddammen er i dag et viktig friluftsområde som skal oppgraderes gjennom Groruddalssatsingen. 2 GAMLE GRORUD Fra 1830–40 årene startet uttak av Nordmarkitten, best kjent som Grorudgranitt. Fra 1870-årene ble dette en vesentlig arbeidsplass i Groruddalen, og ga sammen med annen industrivirksomhet og nærheten til jernbanestasjonen, grunnlag for lokalsamfunnet Grorud.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia Herzegovina Seongjin Kim Equatorial Guinea 1 1 1 UNESCO 1
    Committee Totals (GA, SPC, ICJ Judges ICJ Advocates ICJ Officers School Delegations GA SPC SC Total Total, SC) Opening Speeches GA Opening Speeches SPC Qatar Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 10 2 2 Oman Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 10 Sri Lanka Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 20 Bosnia Herzegovina Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 0 Camaroon Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 Gambia Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 Kiribati Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 Monaco Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 Romania Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 Solomon Islands Agora Sant Cugat International School 1 1 2 South Africa American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 8 2 2 Seongjin Kim Serbia American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 8 Andrew Weston Portugal American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 16 Cambodia American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 1 Central African Republic American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 Equatorial Guinea American International School of Bucharest 1 1 1 2 Lithuania American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 Mongolia American International School of Bucharest 1 1 2 USA American School of Barcelona 1 1 1 3 11 2 2 Norway American School of Barcelona 1 1 2 9 Argentina American School of Barcelona 1 1 2 20 Uraguay American School of Barcelona 1 1 2 1 Chad American School of Barcelona 1 1 2 Guinea Bissau American School of Barcelona 1 1 2 Kyrgyzstan American School of Barcelona 1 1 2 Montenegro
    [Show full text]
  • Success and Fail Factors in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption a Comparison Between Norway and Sweden
    Success and Fail Factors in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption A comparison between Norway and Sweden Master of Science Thesis For the degree of Master of Science in Management of Technology at Delft University of Technology By Ing. Eric S. Tol Student number 1519042 Project duration Dec 2016 – Aug 2017 Thesis committee Prof. Dr. G.P. van Wee Chairman, Delft University of Technology Dr. Ir. J.A. Annema Supervisor, Delft University of Technology Dr. Ir. U. Pesch Supervisor, Delft University of Technology [Page intentionally left blank] 2 CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................ 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 10 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Research problem ............................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Knowledge gaps ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Admissions by
    Applications, Offers & Acceptances by UCAS Apply Centre 2019 UCAS Apply Centre School Name Postcode School Sector Applications Offers Acceptances 10002 Ysgol David Hughes LL59 5SS Maintained <3 <3 <3 10008 Redborne Upper School and Community College MK45 2NU Maintained 6 <3 <3 10011 Bedford Modern School MK41 7NT Independent 14 3 <3 10012 Bedford School MK40 2TU Independent 18 4 3 10018 Stratton Upper School, Bedfordshire SG18 8JB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10022 Queensbury Academy LU6 3BU Maintained <3 <3 <3 10024 Cedars Upper School, Bedfordshire LU7 2AE Maintained <3 <3 <3 10026 St Marylebone Church of England School W1U 5BA Maintained 10 3 3 10027 Luton VI Form College LU2 7EW Maintained 20 3 <3 10029 Abingdon School OX14 1DE Independent 25 6 5 10030 John Mason School, Abingdon OX14 1JB Maintained 4 <3 <3 10031 Our Lady's Abingdon Trustees Ltd OX14 3PS Independent 4 <3 <3 10032 Radley College OX14 2HR Independent 15 3 3 10033 St Helen & St Katharine OX14 1BE Independent 17 10 6 10034 Heathfield School, Berkshire SL5 8BQ Independent 3 <3 <3 10039 St Marys School, Ascot SL5 9JF Independent 10 <3 <3 10041 Ranelagh School RG12 9DA Maintained 8 <3 <3 10044 Edgbarrow School RG45 7HZ Maintained <3 <3 <3 10045 Wellington College, Crowthorne RG45 7PU Independent 38 14 12 10046 Didcot Sixth Form OX11 7AJ Maintained <3 <3 <3 10048 Faringdon Community College SN7 7LB Maintained 5 <3 <3 10050 Desborough College SL6 2QB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10051 Newlands Girls' School SL6 5JB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10053 Oxford Sixth Form College OX1 4HT Independent 3 <3
    [Show full text]
  • Particpating Schools 12Th CGSMUN
    The Rise of Populism December 8-10, 2017 The Rise of Populism LIST OF PARTICIPATING SCHOOL Byron College Anavryta Model Lyceum B’ Arsakeio Tositseio Lykeio Ekalis International School of Athens A’ Tositseio Arsakeio Lykeio Ekalis HAEF Athens College QSI Tbilisi American International School Vienna Ionios School St. Lawrence College Uptown School American Community Schools of Athens Arsakeio School Psychiko (Individual Team) The Moraitis School The Heritage Private School Ekpedeftiki Anagennisi Pierce, The American College of Greece Felsted School Geitonas School Dubai International Academy Rizareios Parochial High School Lycée Franco-Hellénique Eugène Delacroix HAEF Psychico College MEF International School St. Catherine’s British School Heidelberger Privatschulcentrum Doukas School Campion School Platon School TED Ankara College Deutsche Schule Athen CGS Coornhert Gymnasium COUNTRY REPRESENTED SCHOOL NAME COUNTRY ORIGIN Afghanistan Byron College Greece Albania B' Arsakeio Tositseio Lykeio Ekalis Greece Algeria A’ Tositseio Arsakeio Lykeio Ekalis Greece Amnesty International QSI Tbilisi Georgia Argentina Ionios School Greece Australia Uptown School United Arab Emirates Belgium Arsakeio School Psychiko (Individual Team) Greece Bolivia The Heritage Private School Cyprus Botswana Pierce, The American College of Greece Greece Brazil Geitonas School Greece Canada Rizareios Parochial High School Greece Chile HAEF Psychico College Greece China St. Catherine’s British School Greece Cuba Doukas School Greece Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
    [Show full text]
  • Sektorplan Idrett
    Oslo kommune Idrettsetaten Plan Plan for idrett og friluftsliv i Oslo 2009—2012 Sektorplan idrett ”Lilleputt”. Foto: Oslo kommune. Frognerbadet. Foto: Trond Isaksen. Fem-mila. Foto: Oslo kommune. Sammendrag sektorplan idrett Kapittel 1: Innledning Kommunal plan for idrett og fysisk aktivitet skal hvert fjerde år gjennomgå en revidering, noe som innebærer en fullstendig saksbehandling etter plan- og bygningslovens § 20-5, med sluttbehandling i bystyret. Plan for idrett og friluftsliv 2009-2012 er resultatet av en slik revidering. Planen inneholder en langsiktig og en kortsiktig del. Den langsiktige delen inneholder målsettinger, utfordringer og behovsanalyse for en tidsperiode på 10-12 år. Den kortsiktige delen av planen består av et handlingsprogram for kommende fire år, dvs. 2009-2012. Kapittel 2: Overordnede føringer og målsetninger I dette kapittelet redegjøres det for overordnede føringer og målsetninger som har innvirkning på Oslo kommunes planlegging innenfor idrett og fysisk aktivitet. Dette innbefatter statlige og kommunale utredninger, planer og dokumenter der feltet idrett og fysisk aktivitet er tema. Kapittel 3: Resultatvurdering forrige planperiode Evaluering av mål for perioden 2005-2008: En overordnet vurdering er at hovedmålene nedfelt i forrige kommunedelplan har fungert som retningslinjer for byrådets arbeid med å tilrettelegge for idrett og fysisk aktivitet i perioden. For en gjennomgang av hovedmålene og de mer detaljerte delmålene vises det til kapittel 3 i planen. Viktige gjennomførte prosjekter 2005-2008: Kunstgressprosjektet
    [Show full text]
  • 2037074.Pdf (2.788Mb)
    BI Norwegian Business School - campus Oslo GRA 19502 Master Thesis Component of continuous assessment: Thesis Master of Science Final master thesis – Counts 80% of total grade What is the impact of the down payment requirement on the housing market in Oslo? Navn: Eivind Deighan Hanssen, Magnus Meyer Start: 02.03.2018 09.00 Finish: 03.09.2018 12.00 GRA 19502 0956088 0959105 Eivind Deighan Hanssen Magnus Meyer Master in Business Major in Business Law, Tax and Accounting Date of submission: 23.08.2018 “This thesis is a part of the MSc programme at BI Norwegian Business School. The school takes no responsibility for the methods used, results found and conclusions drawn." Page i GRA 19502 0956088 0959105 Abstract On March 1st 2010 the Norwegian government implemented a down payment requirement of 10%, later increased to 15% on December 1st 2011. The down payment requirement states the amount of equity needed to be applicable for a mortgage. In this thesis, we investigate how the down payment requirement has affected the housing prices in Oslo with the goal of increasing knowledge on how governmental actions impact the housing market. By monitoring the buying and rental market in the timespan between 2008 and 2015, we investigate how housing prices have developed using quantitative methodology. Governmental intervention on the housing market is a topic considered to be of high interest, however, we find the research done on down payment requirements in Norway to be insufficient. Through our research, we argue that the down payment requirement had no impact on the housing market in Oslo.
    [Show full text]
  • Kreftkoordinator/Kontakt for Alvorlig Syke I Oslo
    Kreftkoordinator/kontakt for alvorlig syke i Oslo Tlf. til Oslo kommune 21 80 21 80 Bydel Kontaktperson Telefon Lovisenberg sektor: Gamle Oslo (1) Kreftkoordinator Liv Inger Stokvold 416 76 217 [email protected] Grünerløkka (2) Veronica Richardsen Johansen 913 01 842 [email protected] Sagene (3) Kreftkoordinator Grethe Sprone 469 07 623 [email protected] St.Hanshaugen (4) Kreftkoordinator Johanna Kvisle 918 32 665 [email protected] Diakonhjemmet sektor: Frogner (5) Bydelskoordinator Helle Christensen, pall.spl 404 52 326 [email protected] Kreftkoordinator Oddfrid Nesse 994 41 287 [email protected] Ullern (6) Sykepleier Trude Stensholt 915 30 823 [email protected] Vestre Aker (7) Malgorzata Zygewicz (Gosia) 994 83 284 [email protected] Cathrine Stokke 415 28 949 [email protected] Revidert juni 2019 Oslo Universitetssykehus sektor: Bjerke (9) Bydelskoordinator Bjørn Ulsaker 417 54 691 [email protected] 23 43 97 00 Østensjø (13) Bydelskoordinator Tor Arne Henningsen 932 30 170 [email protected] Nordre Aker Bydelskoordinator Ida Smith Hald 917 80 848 (8) [email protected] Nordstrand Kreftkoordinator Lisbeth Klemetsen 992 85 124 (14) [email protected] Søndre Nordstrand: Kreftkoordinator Marte Kvamme 476 81 466 (15) [email protected] A-hus sektor: Alna (12) Kreftkoordinator Siri Vimo Garner
    [Show full text]
  • Somalis in Oslo
    Somalis-cover-final-OSLO_Layout 1 2013.12.04. 12:40 Page 1 AT HOME IN EUROPE SOMALIS SOMALIS IN Minority communities – whether Muslim, migrant or Roma – continue to come under OSLO intense scrutiny in Europe today. This complex situation presents Europe with one its greatest challenges: how to ensure equal rights in an environment of rapidly expanding diversity. IN OSLO At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, is a research and advocacy initiative which works to advance equality and social justice for minority and marginalised groups excluded from the mainstream of civil, political, economic, and, cultural life in Western Europe. Somalis in European Cities Muslims in EU Cities was the project’s first comparative research series which examined the position of Muslims in 11 cities in the European Union. Somalis in European cities follows from the findings emerging from the Muslims in EU Cities reports and offers the experiences and challenges faced by Somalis across seven cities in Europe. The research aims to capture the everyday, lived experiences as well as the type and degree of engagement policymakers have initiated with their Somali and minority constituents. somalis-oslo_incover-publish-2013-1209_publish.qxd 2013.12.09. 14:45 Page 1 Somalis in Oslo At Home in Europe somalis-oslo_incover-publish-2013-1209_publish.qxd 2013.12.09. 14:45 Page 2 ©2013 Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Norge Bydelsanalysen 2020 OSLO
    UNICEF Norge Bydelsanalysen 2020 OSLO Store forskjeller mellom bydelene … og dermed i barns oppvekstsvilkår Forbehold om trykkfeil og endringer UNICEF Norge Bydelsanalysen 2020 - Oslo er basert på bydelenes egen statistikk for 2019. Bydelene har selv rapportert inn statistikken til Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB). UNICEF Norge hentet ut statistikken i perioden 1.-11. september 2020. Bydelenes statistikk er dynamisk og i stadig endring. Små justeringer kan derfor ha oppstått i løpet av perioden UNICEF Norge har jobbet med analysen (august - oktober 2020). Leseren anbefales å ha dette i mente når rapporten leses. UNICEF Norge tar forbehold om eventuelle trykkfeil og skrivefeil. UNICEF Norges 2 Bydelsanalyse - Oslo Innhold Kapittel 1: Innledning 1.1 UNICEF Norges Bydelsanalyse - Oslo 5 1.2 Metodikk og begrensninger 6 1.3 Variabler 7 1.4 Rangering etter sektor 8 Kapittel 4: Budsjettanalyse 2.1 Budsjettanalyse 10 Kapittel 3: Sektoranalyse 3.1 Barnehage 13 3.2 Barnevern 15 3.3 Helsetjeneste 17 3.4 Kulturtilbud 19 Kapittel 4: Oppsummering 21 UNICEF Norges 3 Bydelsanalyse - Oslo Innledning UNICEF Norges 4 Bydelsanalyse - Oslo 1.1 UNICEF Norges Bydelsanalyse: Oslo Alle barn har rett til en trygg oppvekst for å kunne utvikle seg til sitt fulle potensial. Dette er et bærende prinsipp i FNs barnekonvensjon. I praksis betyr dette at barn og unge i Norge skal sikres likeverdig oppvekstsvilkår uavhengig av hvor i landet de bor og hvor lenge de har bodd i landet. Oslo står i en spesiell stilling med hensyn til lokal forvaltning ettersom Oslo både er en kommune og et fylke. Per 11. september 2020 bor det 152 711 barn og unge i alderen 0-20 år i Oslo.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Norway 1953-2012
    Chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Norway 1953-2012 Doctoral thesis by Andrea Lenartova Cand.med. Department of Hematology Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo University Hospital Norway 2020 © Andrea Lenartova, 2020 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo ISBN 978-82-8377-726-0 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Hanne Baadsgaard Utigard. Print production: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo. Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Thesis summary ................................................................................................................................. 7 Articles in the thesis ........................................................................................................................ 10 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Zooming in ..................................................................................................................................... 11 CLL pathogenesis ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Children and COVID-19 November 2020
    . Europe’s journal on infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control Special edition: Children and COVID-19 November 2020 Featuring • COVID-19 school outbreaks • Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in children • Guidelines and considerations for paediatric risk groups • Impact of unplanned school closure • and more... www.eurosurveillance.org Editorial team Editorial advisors Based at the European Centre for Albania: Alban Ylli, Tirana Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Austria: Maria Paulke-Korinek, Vienna 169 73 Stockholm, Sweden Belgium: Tinne Lernout, Brussels Telephone number Bosnia and Herzegovina: Nina Rodić Vukmir, Banja Luka +46 (0)8 58 60 11 38 Bulgaria: Iva Christova, Sofia E-mail Croatia: Sanja Kurečić Filipović, Zagreb [email protected] Cyprus: Maria Koliou, Nicosia Czech Republic: Jan Kynčl, Prague Editor-in-chief Denmark: Peter Henrik Andersen, Copenhagen Dr Ines Steffens Estonia: to be nominated Senior editor Finland: Outi Lyytikäinen, Helsinki Kathrin Hagmaier France: Valérie Colombani-Cocuron, Paris Germany: Jamela Seedat, Berlin Scientific editors Greece: Rengina Vorou, Athens Janelle Sandberg Hungary: Ágnes Hajdu, Budapest Karen Wilson Iceland: Gudrun Sigmundsdottir, Reykjavík Assistant editor Ireland: Joan O Donnell, Dublin Alina Buzdugan Italy: Paola De Castro, Rome Associate editors Kosovo, under UN Security Council Resolution 1244: to be nominated Tommi Asikainen, Brussels, Belgium Latvia: Dzintars Mozgis, Riga Magnus Boman, Stockholm, Sweden Lithuania: Nerija Kupreviciene, Vilnius Mike Catchpole,
    [Show full text]