pumilio Scientific & Charles Vincent Pinel

Rudolf Jenny Swiss Orchid Foundation, Jany Renz Herbarium, University of Basel, Switzerland. [email protected]

Homalopetalum pumilio (Rchb.f.) Schlechter, Repertorium Novarum Specierum Regni Vegetabilis, Beihefte 19:48.1923

Bletia pumilio (Rchb.f.) Rchb.f., Walpers Annales Botanices Systematicae 6(3):433.1862

Brassavola pumilio Rchb.f., Linnaea 18:402.1844

Homalopetalum Rolfe, Hooker’s Icones Plantarum ser.4,5:t.2461.1896

Homalopetalum costaricense Schlechter, Repertorium Novarum Specie- rum Regni Vegetabilis, Beihefte 19:47 – 48.1923

Homalopetalum lehmannianum (Kränzlin) Schlechter, Repertorium No- varum Specierum Regni Vegetabilis, Beihefte 19:48.1923

Pinelia Lindley, Folia Orchidacea 1:Pinelia.1853 (not Tenore !)

Pinelia lehmanniana Kränzlin, Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pfl anzengeschichte und Pfl anzengeographie 26:479.1898

Pinelia pumilio (Rchb.f.) Schlechter, Botanisches Centralblatt, Beihefte, 36:478.1918

Pinelia tuerckheimii Kränzlin, Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 44:326 – 327.1930

Restrepia lehmanniana (Kränzlin) Schlechter, Repertorium Novarum Spe- cierum Regni Vegetabilis 3:277.1907

Abstract: The history of Homalopetalum pumilio and Charles Vincent PINEL is explained.

Keywords: History, Homalopetalum, Charles Vincent Pinel.

• 151 • The fi rst mention of the species today he described a new species as Homalo- known as Homalopetalum pumilio was petalum costaricense, based on material the article “Plantae Leiboldianae” in Carlos Werckle collected in Costa Rica in “Linnaea” by Heinrich Gustav Reichen- 1922. bach in 1844. Reichenbach described a collected in Mexico by Friedrich Pinelia lehmanniana was described by Ernst Leibold as Brassavola pumilio. In Friedrich Wilhelm Ludwig Kränzlin in 1863 in “Walpers Annales Botanices 1898 in “Botanische Jahrbücher für Sys- Systematicae” Reichenbach recombi- tematik”, the material had been collec- ned his Brassavola pumilio to Bletia pu- ted by Frederico Carlos Lehmann around milio as he had got better material from Popayan, Colombia. As usual Kränzlin Wilhelm Schaff ner, a German collector did not publish a drawing of the spe- and pharmacist in Mexico. In 1918 Rudolf cies; fortunately several isotypes of Le- Schlechter recombined in “Botanisches hmann’s collection of Pinelia lehmannia- Centralblatt, Beihefte”, Brassavola pumi- na are available. Schlechter recombined lio Rchb.f. to Pinelia pumilio. Pinelia lehmanniana Kränzlin in 1907 in “Repertorium Novarum Specierum Reg- The Pinelia was described in 1853 ni Vegetabilis” to Restrepia lehmanniana. in “Folia Orchidacea” by John Lindley as Together with the fi rst description of Ho- a monotypic genus with the type species malopetalum costaricense Schlechter re- Pinelia hypolepta. Lindley had received combined in 1923 also Kränzlin’s Pinelia from Charles Vincent Pinel a dried plant lehmanniana – and with this also his own with some notes and a drawing, and Restrepia lehmanniana– to Homalopeta- wrote “This very singular plant has been lum lehmannianum. Both taxa are today communicated by the Chevalier Pinel, treated as synonyms of Homalopetalum a French botanist, who has paid atten- pumilio. tion to the minute species of the order, and after whom it is named”. However The last synonym of our species was in 1839 Michele Tenore had described a again created by Kränzlin, in 1930 he des- genus from the family as Pine- cribed Pinelia tuerckheimii in “Annalen llia. This generic name was conserved des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien” and so Lindley’s very similar but newer after a plant collected by Baron Hans von Pinelia is a homonym and invalid. Based Tuerckheim in 1877 in Guatemala and on those facts Stefan Rauschert created preserved in the Reichenbach herbarium in 1983 in “Feddes Repertorium” the new in Vienna. genus Pinelianthe for Lindley’s Pinelia hypolepta and two other Pinelia species. As understood today, the genus Homa- lopetalum includes four species, beside The genus Homalopetalum was des- Homalopetalum pumilio there are Homa- cribed by Robert Allen Rolfe in “Hooker’s lopetalum pachyphyllum (L.O.Williams) Icones Plantarum”, Homalopetalum ja- Dressler, Homalopetalum vomeriforme maicense was defi ned and illustrated as (Rchb.f.) Fawcett & Rendle and Homa- type species. Rolfe received material lopetalum pumilum (Ames) Dressler, the which had been collected in Jamaica by latter one is not to be mistaken for Ho- W.Harris and wrote: “A remarkable little malopetalum pumilio! Homalopetalum plant with creeping rhizomes but in other kienastii (Rchb.f.) Withner (1998), based aspects closely resembling the Brazilian on Ponera kienastii Rchb.f. (1877) is today Pinelia hypolepta, Lindl. in habit”. treated as Domingoa kienastii (Rchb.f.) Dressler (1964). In 1923 Schlechter recombined in “Re- pertorium Novarum Specierum Regni Homalopetalum pumilio has a very large Vegetabilis, Beihefte” his Pinelia pumilio distribution area from Mexico through to Homalopetalum pumilio, today the va- Central-America to Brazil, Colombia, lid name for the species. Simultaneously Ecuador and Peru. As often in such cases

Orquideología XXXIII - 2 / octubre - 2016 the species shows a considerable variabi- Mémoire sur le Brésil, pour servir de guide à lity in plant-habit and fl ower. This would ceux que désirent s’y établir–. Through his help explain the fact that it has been des- plant-export business he was in close Scientific cribed under several names, according to contact with collectors and nurseries their origin. in Europe, and one of his best custo- mers was the nursery of Charles Morel Charles Vincent Pinel was born the se- in St.Mandé near Paris. In Espirito San- cond son of a famous French psychia- to he discovered Laelia pumila, Laelia trist, Philippe Pinel, on 27th April 1802 in grandis and Miltonia cuneata. Oncidium Paris. In Nimes he studied natural scien- pinelianum – synonym of Oncidium ba- ces and law, then after graduation he temanianum – is named after him. Char- began writing plays – without success– les Vincent Pinel died on 18th July 1871 in and some political articles. Because his Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro Brazil. ideas were in opposition to those of the royalist regime in Paris, he was arrested When Heinrich Gustav Reichenbach visi- and forced to leave France. So in 1830 ted Kew in October and November 1856, he emigrated to Brazil, never to return. he found in the collection of John Lindley Charles married Marie Catherine Rime a dried specimen of a small orchid which on 27th April 1835 in Nova Friburgo, Bra- Charles Pinel had sent to Kew, together zil, – Marie Catherine was born in 1816 with a small drawing made by one of in Charmey, Switzerland, she died on 5th his daughters. Reichenbach described August 1890 in Nova Friburgo–. Together in 1863 in “Hamburger Garten- und Blu- they had nine children. In Brazil Charles menzeitung” the new genus Chytroglos- followed his botanical interests, he trave- sa with Chytroglossa marileoniae as type, lled widely through the country and co- dedicated to Maria Leontina Pinel, eldest llected , mainly Bromeliaceae and daughter of Charles Pinel, born on 23rd which he then exported to April 1837. Maria Leontina was like her Europe. two younger sisters Joanna Honorina Amada and Clara Dorothea a gifted ar- He published several books, one of them tist. was advice for settlers from Europe –

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES See spanish version.

PHOTO CREDIT See spanish version.

• 153 •