DOCSLIB.ORG

Respect's Special Women's Rights Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Respect's Special Women's Rights Issue SPECIAL WOMEN’S RIGHTS ISSUE Celebrating 100 Years of the 19th Amendment A DIVERSITY NEWSLETTER PUBLISHED BY NEW JERSEY STATE BAR FOUNDATION Women’s Suffrage, 100 Years and Counting by Jodi L. Miller On August 18, 1920, the 19th Amendment, which granted suffrage to women, was ratified by the states. It was a stunning achievement, representing the single largest influx of voters to the electorate in American history. The Women’s Suffrage Movement had a long and difficult journey beginning suffrage. Ultimately, 68 women and 32 men, including Frederick Douglass, an in 1848 with the first women’s rights convention held in Seneca Falls, NY, led abolitionist and ardent supporter of women’s suffrage, would sign the by well-known suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott. Like all declaration. The notion that women would seek any type of equality to men, movements, it met with resistance, and it took many people from all walks of life especially the vote, was met with ridicule. and different backgrounds to achieve its ultimate goal. “All women made this happen—working women, immigrant Why the resistance? women, African American women,” says Dr. Betty Livingston “From the beginning the country has been a patriarchal Adams, a historian and former university professor. “Elite white society,” notes Dr. Livingston Adams. “In an all male electorate women could not have done this alone.” with wealthy men in power, why would they want to expand At that first women’s rights convention, the Declaration the franchise?” of Sentiments was introduced. It was based on the Declaration Men definitely made their displeasure about women’s of Independence and included 12 resolutions related to desire for the vote known. Dr. Deirdre Foreman, a Sociology women’s rights, the most controversial being the call for women’s professor at Ramapo College of New Jersey, points out that both CONTINUED ON PAGE EIGHT A Victory For Some, Not For All by Jodi L. Miller For some women the passage of the 19th Amendment wasn’t the end of the journey, but the beginning of a new struggle. While the 19th Amendment stated that a citizen’s right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex,” voting laws were determined by the states. In the 1920 presidential election, nearly eight behind, despite the passage of the 19th Amendment. Institute, a women’s rights organization, named after million women voted, but many more were left Lucienne Beard, executive director of the Alice Paul the well-known suffragist, argues that no one was CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO SPECIAL WOMEN’S RIGHTS ISSUE • PAGE TWO Victory for Some CONTINUED FROM PAGE ONE left behind, maintaining that suffragists worked for to vote until the passage of the Immigration and Double discrimination an amendment to allow ALL women the right to vote. Nationality Act of 1952. Black women, then and now, not only have to It was individual states that suppressed the vote, African American women living in the deal with sexism but racism as well. In 1892, Anna she says. South would wait even longer. They were Julia Cooper, a prominent African American scholar, Native American women, for example, disenfranchised just as their male wrote A Voice from the South by a Black Woman from would not gain citizenship until the counterparts had been after the 15th the South. In it, Cooper wrote about what it meant to Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 and Amendment , which granted Black men be both Black and a woman or what she called, “the even then some western states, the right to vote, was passed. Southern woman question and the race problem.” Cooper including Arizona, New Mexico and states instituted poll taxes, impossible- wrote, “The colored woman of today occupies…a Utah, barred them from voting. to-pass literacy tests and other barriers unique position in this country…She is confronted The Chinese Exclusion Act limited to keep African Americans from even by both a women question and a race problem, and immigration from China and severely registering to vote, let alone actually is yet an unknown or an unacknowledged factor in restricted the rights of Chinese casting a ballot. It wouldn’t be until 1965 both.” Americans, including denying them and the passage of the Voting Rights In her book, Black Women’s Christian Activism, Act (VRA) that Black women and men citizenship. Chinese American Dr. Betty Livingston Adams, a historian and former in the South would be granted their women would not gain the right university professor, points out that Black women constitutional right to vote. Black women activists, were rejected for church leadership positions like Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks and Dorothy because of their gender and from women’s groups Acceptance DIVERSITY Equality Racial Equality issues Height, would continue the fight, working along side Immigration Rights Sexual Identity Acceptance DIVERSITY Equality because of their race. issuesDr. Martin Luther King Jr., to make that happen. Racial Equality Immigration Rights Sexual IdentitAcceptance DIVERSITY Equality Black women also had to fight against the Racial Equality Immigration Rights Sexual IdentitAcceptance DIVERSITY EqualityThe VRA prohibited discrimination in voting issues Racial Equality Immigration Rights Sexual IdentitAcceptance DIVERSITY Equality prejudices of Black men, who Dr. Livingston Adams issues nationwide on the basis of race or being a member Racial Equality Immigration Rights SexualRespect Identit Acceptance DIVERSITY Equality Racial Equality says, like white men, “bought into the separate issues Respect issues of a language minority group. The Act also eliminated sphere ideology,” believing that women didn’t need This publication was made possible literacy tests as a means to disenfranchise voters. through funding from the the vote. A special provision of the VRA was Section 5, which IOLTA Fund of the Bar of New Jersey. Dr. Livingston Adams writes in her book that required certain jurisdictions with a history of obtaining the vote meant something different for Jodi L. Miller discrimination to obtain preclearance from Editor Black women. “For women who had to fight for the U.S. Attorney General before implementing respect from white women and black and white Editorial Advisory Board any changes to voting laws. Jurisdictions covered men, the ballot represented personal protection and Robyn B. Gigl, Esq. by Section 5 included nine states in their entirety Chair social justice.” (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mary M. Ace, LCSW Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia), as Naeem Akhtar, Esq. Keeping power well as parts of six other states (California, Florida, Hon. Kim C. Belin Just as gender and race are bound together for New York, North Carolina, Michigan and South Tamara Britt, Esq. Black women, they are connected in terms of voting Risa M. Chalfin, Esq. Dakota). The provision was meant to expire after five rights as well. Dr. Deirdre Foreman, an adjunct Eli L. Eytan, Esq. years; however, Section 5 was renewed five times Sociology professor at Ramapo College of New Jersey Norberto A. Garcia, Esq. by Congress. Unfortunately, with its 2013 decision John F. Gillick, Esq. and associate director of its Equal Opportunity Fund, in Shelby v. Holder, the U.S. Supreme Court struck Hon. Lisa James-Beavers says that the 19th Amendment was always tied to down Section 4 of the VRA, which has essentially Ronald G. Lieberman, Esq. white supremacy and keeping power. Wendy Allyson Reek, Esq. left Section 5 of the Act unenforceable. Section In 1919, when Congress was debating whether Cheyne R. Scott, Esq. 4 contained the formula for determining what to vote for the 19th Amendment, race and the 15th Margaret Leggett Tarver, Esq. jurisdictions were covered under Section 5. Brandon L. Wolff, Esq. Amendment were on their minds. During debates Thomas A. Zeringo in the Senate, South Carolina Senator Ellison ©2020 New Jersey State Bar Foundation CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE SPECIAL WOMEN’S RIGHTS ISSUE • PAGE THREE Victory for Some CONTINUED FROM PAGE TWO Smith said, “The Southern man who votes for the Historian Rosalyn Terborg-Penn wrote, Why is the right to vote so important, that Susan B. Anthony Amendment votes to ratify the “Within a few years, white supremacy was victorious women collectively fought for 72 years, and then, in 15th Amendment.” He called the 19th Amendment the case of African American women, for 45 more? “a crime against white civilization” and said that “Voting rights is a gateway to political power,” extending voting rights “to the other half of the Negro “If you have the right Dr. Foreman says. “If you have the right to vote, race would unleash new evils.” you are part of the jury system, you’re able to Dr. Livingston Adams says that white suffragists to vote, you are part run for office and make decisions about your were often willing to betray minorities in order to of the jury system, neighborhood.” obtain the vote for themselves. Dr. Foreman notes that it is important to vote, For example, in a letter to a Southern you’re able to run not just in national elections, but also in local ones. congressman, Carrie Chapman Catt, president of for office and make “Local legislators, mayor, governor—those elections the National American Woman Suffrage Association affect your day-to-day life,” she says. “Until our (NAWSA) wrote, “The present condition in the South decisions about your elected officials are more diverse and representative makes sovereigns of some negro men, while neighborhood.” of the country, things won’t change.” all white women are their subjects. These are sad In other words, without a vote, you have no but solemn truths. If you want white supremacy, why voice. • not have it constitutionally, honorably? The Federal throughout the South.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addressing and Preventing Sexist Advertising
    — Addressing and preventing sexist advertising An analysis of local and global promising practice Abstract This research paper explores the efficacy of interventions that aim to address sexism or promote progressive gender representations in advertising, highlighting examples of local and global promising practice. Interventions to prevent or address sexist advertising may occur through several distinct mechanisms: legislative frameworks; self-regulatory and co-regulatory systems; the provision of educational resources to the broader community; industry initiatives to re-shape advertising culture and promote diverse, inclusive and ethical practice; and the exertion of influence on advertisers and regulators through consumer activism. The paper explores the strengths and limitations of each mechanism and illustrates interventions in practice through a variety of case studies. Critical to addressing sexist advertising is a whole of system approach with mutually reinforcing interventions that capitalise on different opportunities for influence. Concluding summations are offered throughout with a range of recommendations drawn from these at the end of the paper. Authors and researchers This research paper has been written and researched by: Dr Lauren Gurrieri, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, RMIT University Dr Rob Hoffman, Research Assistant, RMIT University This research is funded by Women’s Health Victoria as part of the Advertising (in)equality project and supported by the Victorian Government through its Free from Violence Innovation Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Pink Is the New Tax
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Communication Senior Capstones Senior Projects Fall 2020 Pink Is The New Tax Eliana Burns Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/senior_comm Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Burns, Eliana, "Pink Is The New Tax" (2020). Communication Senior Capstones. 1. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/senior_comm/1 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Senior Projects at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Senior Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eliana Burns Humboldt State University 2020 Department of Communications Pink Is The New Tax 1 Historically women in America have made colossal advances that have proven they are just as capable as men. Women had fought and continued to challenge the system since 1919 with the 19th Amendment giving them a right to vote. However, even with this crucial progression, womens’ oppression can be found all around us only in much more subtle ways such as “ the pink tax”. As of 2020 there are currently no federal laws to outlaw companies from charging different prices depending on which gender they are meant to be marketed to. This rhetorical analysis will first address the concept of gendered products, how the tax benefits from these products, and why gendering of products reinforce gender discrimination and stereotypes. A brief explanation as to why the tax is nicknamed “the tampon tax” is included.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Invisible Government” and Conservative Tax Lobbying 1935–1936
    KORNHAUSER_PAGINATED (DO NOT DELETE) 5/3/2018 3:02 PM THE “INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT” AND CONSERVATIVE TAX LOBBYING 1935–1936 MARJORIE E. KORNHAUSER* “[M]ost legislation is fathered not by parties but by minority groups, and these groups maintain their pressure without ceasing.”1 I INTRODUCTION: LOBBYING AND TAXATION IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY Tax-collecting and lobbying may not be the oldest professions in the world, but both surely are strong competitors for next oldest. This universality—in both time and geography—attests to the essential roles taxation and lobbying play in all types of societies. Taxation’s ubiquity occurs because, in the long run, it provides governments the surest stream of necessary revenues. Lobbying’s universality derives from the human desire to obtain benefits from those in a position to bestow such favors. When the benefit directly affects a person’s wallet—as taxation surely does—the incentive to lobby is immense. In the United States, tax lobbying is nearly irresistible because both taxation and lobbying hold special places in American democracy and the American psyche. Anti-tax sentiment has deep-seated historic and mythic ties to American conceptions of democracy, liberty and patriotism.2 The link began with cries of “No Taxation without Representation” at the nation’s birth and remains strong today. Further strengthening the anti-tax and patriotism bond is the belief that taxes destroy federalism. Lowering taxes, in this view, starves the twin-headed beast of centralization and bureaucracy and prevents the federal government from stepping into unconstitutional state functions. Another link is a common belief that low taxation spurs that most American of traits and goals—individual enterprise and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Era Campaign and Menstrual Equity
    THE ERA CAMPAIGN AND MENSTRUAL EQUITY Jennifer Weiss-Wolf¥ A robust national campaign for the Equal Rights Amendment conceded defeat in 1982 when ratification fell short by three of the 38 states needed to prevail. But in 2017, the Nevada legislature cast its vote to ratify the ERA, followed by Illinois in 2018, marking a revival. Now national movement leaders and legislators in several states—notably, Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia—are rallying to achieve the 38-state threshold.1 Over the nearly four decades in between, of course, much has changed in American life and law. The fight for gender equality under the law has made significant headway—from the evolution of Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence in sex discrimination cases, to advances in employment and economic policies, to the now vibrant and potent era of activism defined by campaigns like #MeToo and #TIMESUP. Well beyond the symbolic significance of enshrining gender equality in the Constitution, there are lingering legal and policy inequities the ERA would help rectify—among these, workplace discrimination, including on account of pregnancy; paid family leave; and increased protection from violence and harassment. Other benefits include the ability of Congress to enforce gender equality through legislation and, more generally, creation of a social framework to formally acknowledge systemic biases that permeate and often limit women’s daily experiences. There is one issue, in particular—an emerging area of U.S. policymaking— that falls squarely at the intersection of these goals and outcomes, but is largely absent from ERA discourse thus far: menstruation and the emerging movement for “menstrual equity.” This essay describes the progress of that agenda through policy advocacy, litigation, and social activism, and explains why menstrual equity belongs in discourse about—and will be an invaluable asset for—the campaign to ratify the ERA.
    [Show full text]
  • Rolling Back the “Pink Tax”: Dim Prospects for Eliminating Gender-Based Price Discrimination in the Sale of Consumer Goods and Services
    California Western Law Review Volume 54 Number 2 Article 2 7-30-2018 Rolling Back the “Pink Tax”: Dim Prospects for Eliminating Gender-Based Price Discrimination in the Sale of Consumer Goods and Services Kenneth A. Jacobsen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Jacobsen, Kenneth A. (2018) "Rolling Back the “Pink Tax”: Dim Prospects for Eliminating Gender-Based Price Discrimination in the Sale of Consumer Goods and Services," California Western Law Review: Vol. 54 : No. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol54/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jacobsen: Rolling Back the “Pink Tax”: Dim Prospects for Eliminating Gender Jacobsen camera ready (Do Not Delete) 7/16/2018 11:36 AM CALIFORNIA WESTERN LAW REVIEW VOLUME 54 SPRING 2018 NUMBER 2 ROLLING BACK THE “PINK TAX”: DIM PROSPECTS FOR ELIMINATING GENDER-BASED PRICE DISCRIMINATION IN THE SALE OF CONSUMER GOODS AND SERVICES KENNETH A. JACOBSEN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 241 II. STUDIES, SURVEYS, AND REPORTS ON THE “PINK TAX” ................ 243 III. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LEGISLATION ................................ 251 A. Problems with Existing Consumer Protection Laws ........ 255
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Women's Movements to Develop Intersectional Policy
    Policy Briefs 2019 Moana Genevey Learning from women’s movements to develop intersectional policy-making and inclusive policies: the Belgian Women’s Strike Supported by Table Of Contents 3 Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Case study: the Belgian Women’s Strike 5 A movement promoting intersectional claims 6 A movement based on an intersectional functioning 7 Problem description 9 Conclusion and policy recommendations 10 References Learning from women’s movements to develop intersectional policy-making and inclusive policies: the Belgian Women’s Strike Moana Genevey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This policy brief aims to explore ways to operationalise the concept of intersectionality in poli- cy-making in Europe. It takes into consideration the lessons brought by women’s movements in the world, and in particular in Belgium. The Belgian Women’s Strike drafted a set of policy claims which focuses on the needs and experience of the most vulnerable and marginalised women in Belgium. This recent movement also developed an intersectional approach to organise the strike, with dedicated mecha- nisms tasked to ensure the operationalisation of intersectionality in all its activities. While there is an increased attention given by policy-makers to the concept of intersectionality, they still face structural barriers to put it into practice. The scarcity of disaggregated data, insufficient participation of marginalised people in policy-making and the absence of effective mechanisms to operationalise intersectionality are strong obstacles to achieve intersectionality in policy-making. The recommendation for policy-makers are centered first on increasing the visibility of margin- alised people, through data collection and the use of inclusive language.
    [Show full text]
  • A TAX CODE for the REST of US: a Framework & Recommendations for Advancing Gender & Racial Equity Through Tax Credits
    A TAX CODE FOR THE REST OF US: A Framework & Recommendations for Advancing Gender & Racial Equity Through Tax Credits AUTHORS NOVEMBER 2019 Melissa Boteach, Amy K. Matsui, Indivar Dutta-Gupta, Kali Grant, Funke Aderonmu, Rachel Black ABSTRACT While the U.S. income tax system is progressive overall, many aspects of the tax code reward wealth-building by the already wealthy and exclude low- and moderate-income families. Given the historical discrimination and ongoing structural barriers that have locked women and people of color out of economic opportunity, such tax provisions not only exacerbate economic inequality, but also amplify gender and racial disparities. Notable exceptions include the Earned Income Tax tax subsidies due to insufficient revenues to invest in Credit (EITC) and the refundable portion of the Child programs supporting economic opportunity, as well as Tax Credit (CTC), which boost low- and moderate- the design of many tax provisions that do not reflect income families’ economic security and increase the needs and preferences of families struggling to gender and racial equity. This prompts the question: make ends meet. It then discusses some limitations how can our tax code build on this success to better and benefits of refundable tax credits to help fill dismantle structural barriers that impede economic the resulting gap and argues that the tax code can security and wealth-building for women and people and should do more to advance equity, economic of color? This report examines our system of existing mobility, and opportunity for all. It ultimately proposes individual income tax subsidies and complementary a framework to help policymakers, advocates, and the direct spending programs that seek to advance policy public evaluate when and how refundable tax credits goals across several categories, including housing, can be in service of that goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Practical Gender in Critical Pedagogy Analyzing Everyday Objects
    Intersectional Pedagogy Creative Education Practices for Gender and Peace Work Gal Harmat First published 2020 ISBN: 978-0-367-33380-5 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-31951-8 (ebk) Chapter 2 Practical gender in critical pedagogy Analyzing everyday objects (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) 2 Practical gender in critical pedagogy Analyzing everyday objects This chapter offers a theoretical and methodological framework for implementing feminist critical pedagogy in compulsory courses in gender studies. The method examined presents a gender analysis of daily objects by students as a means of dealing with resistance to gender studies and feminist theory, as well as creating a consciousness-chan- ging experience for the participants. The study is based on the doc- umentation of courses I taught in three higher education institutions between 2012 and 2019: The Kibbutzim College of Education, Technology and the Arts and the Academic College of Society and the Arts, both in Israel, and the UN’s University for Peace in Costa Rica. In addition, the educational practice was used in international trainings for peace and development workers from various international devel- opment agencies. Throughout the chapter, I will discuss examples of the objects presented by the students and the discourses generated by these presentations. These examples will form the basis for my analysis of how the objects were analyzed, regarding the material, social, and symbolic qualities they hold. Deconstructing and restructuring them allows for the implementation of wide critical gender observation skills and can bring about a significant change in consciousness among the learning community. I will argue that using a gender-oriented analysis of everyday objects promotes understanding from a gender perspective of real-life situations and their influence on men, women, and people who do not identify by binary gender while focusing maximal attention on cultural differences and intersectionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Work, and Wages in Vermont 2 TABLE of CONTENTS
    2019 Status Report: Women, Work, and Wages in Vermont 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS A DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT 08 Age • Race • Marital Status • Living with Minor Children • Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity • Education • Disability Status WOMEN AND POVERTY 11 Family Status • Disability • Race/Ethnicity • Age • Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity WOMEN, WORK AND THE GENDER WAGE GAP 14 Labor Force Participation • Low-Wage and Tipped Occupations • The Gender Wage Gap WHY THE WAGE GAP? 24 Occupational Segregation • Time In and Out of the Workforce • Gender Bias, Cultural Expectations, and Discrimination • Sexual Harassment • Intimate Partner Violence WOMEN NOT ONLY EARN LESS...THEY SOMETIMES PAY MORE 35 Student Loan Debt • The "Pink Tax" ADDING IT UP 38 RECOMMENDATIONS 40 3 INTRODUCTION This report is published by Change The Story VT (CTS), a partnership initiative of three statewide organizations: the Vermont Women’s Fund, Vermont Commission on Women, and Vermont Works for Women. Founded in 2015, its mission is to align philanthropy, policy, and programs to fast track women’s economic well-being in Vermont. This is our fifth report on topics related to women’s economic status and leadership. In it we explore a range of factors that contribute to women’s lower earnings. Our findings reflect that women continue to be a disproportionate share of Vermonters living in poverty, working in low-wage jobs, shouldering primary responsibility for child or elder care, and experiencing sexual harassment and intimate partner violence. Women’s relative economic vulnerability is sometimes explained as the product of women’s choices. But this is an oversimplification that obscures the influence of context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pink Tax: Gender-Based Pricing Hurts Women's Buying Power
    December 2016 The Pink Tax How Gender-Based Pricing Hurts Women’s Buying Power Much has been written about women as wage-earners, particularly the fact that they typically earn less than men. In 2015, a woman with median earnings working full time, year-round earned only 80 percent of what her male counterpart earned.1 This 20-percent difference is widely known as the “gender pay gap.” For a typical female worker, the pay gap adds up to nearly $10,500 over the course of a year and roughly $500,000 over a lifetime.2 This contributes to higher poverty rates among women. Research has shown that if women were paid the same as comparable men, the poverty rate among working women would be cut in half.3 However, it is less well known that women also are disadvantaged as consumers – frequently paying substantially more than men for similar goods and services. Common products and services marketed to women, ranging from razors and soaps to dry cleaning, often cost more than similar products marketed to men. Manufacturers and retailers may claim that the price difference is due to higher costs for producing women’s products or providing services for women, but there is a great deal of evidence that there are significant price differences for practically identical products. In some cases, the only difference is the color. This markup has become known as the “pink tax.” Despite Challenges, Women’s Earning Power Is Greater than Ever Women’s participation in the paid workforce has increased dramatically since the Equal Pay Act and Civil Rights Act were enacted more than 50 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpinking Discrimination: Exploring the Pink Tax and Its Implications
    International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law (IJPSL) Volume 1, Issue 3 International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law Volume 1, Issue 3 UnPinking Discrimination: Exploring the Pink Tax and its Implications Svasti Pant1 This Article is brought to you for “free” and “open access” by the International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law. For more, visit http://ijpsl.in/ To submit your manuscript, email it to us at [email protected] or click here 1 B.A. Hons. Economics, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, India 1354 International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law (IJPSL) Volume 1, Issue 3 Abstract The prevalence of gender discrimination in modern-day societies can be found in countless socio-economic forms, from the gender pay gap to laws of inheritance and access to education. A lesser-known form of gender discrimination exists in prices of products and services, in the form of “pink tax”. The pink tax is the additional amount paid by female customers as compared to their male counterparts for nearly identical products and services. From personal care products and clothing to children’s toys and services, the pink tax is found across sectors. Through gendered marketing, corporates have conveniently managed to maximise profits without letting their customers learn about this discriminatory practice. In recent years, some corporations have consciously adopted gender-neutral pricing policies and have attempted to educate more consumers about the pink tax. Eliminating the pink tax is a step forward towards gender equality, which is also the 5th Sustainable Development Goal of the UN. Through this paper, the author aims to increase awareness about the pink tax and to initiate discussions about combating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Activism
    BRAND ACTIVISM: WORKING TOWARD PROGRESSIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS IN ADVERTISING by RACHEL BENNER A THESIS Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts June 2018 An Abstract of the Thesis of Rachel Benner for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the School of Journalism and Communication to be taken June 2018 Title: Brand Activism: Working Toward Progressive Representations of Social Movements in Advertising Approved: _______________________________________ Professor Kim Sheehan Brands and advertising agencies have always used the cultural energy of social movements to connect to new audiences and promote their products. Academics have written a large body of critique about the intersection of social movements and marketing, but it is largely ignored by the advertising industry. This thesis addresses that disconnect, helping advertisers address critical discourse around social movements and brands, leading to industry success and progressive allyship with social movements. After exploring studies of social movements’ framing in advertising messages, this project assesses the strengths and weaknesses of those frames with a theoretical model. In-depth interviews with advertising professionals shape a best practices guide for creating activist ads. Advertisers today can leverage successful framing strategies to address social movements in their work by extending existing critical conversations about brand activism beyond large-scale strategy and into the message creation process. They can also succeed by giving their brand activism the context of tangible action and responsibly researching the audience they seek to reach with their messaging. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Kim Sheehan for her patience, insight, and commitment to my thesis experience.
    [Show full text]