DOCSLIB.ORG

Intersectionality Marginalisation and Gender

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intersectionality Marginalisation and Gender East Africa Tax and Governance Network Intersectionality, Marginalisation and Gender Tax Inequality in Kenya A Working Paper ABOUT EATGN The East African Tax and Governance Network (EATGN) was founded in 2009 in Nairobi, Kenya, as a membership organisation of individuals and non-state actor institutions that share the understanding that taxation is fundamental in achieving social justice and development goals. EATGN is therefore a network of more than 16 organisations across the East Africa Community (EAC) specialising in taxation, governance, public policy, research and capacity building specifically working to create links between its various constituencies in the region to improve tax policy while deepening democratic governance. Of interest is the importance EATGN attaches to understanding tax management and how these shape policy outcomes. The network is working to establish strong and sustainable national tax justice platforms in the EAC by implementing a five-year strategic plan 2019-2023. This will be done through pursuit of substantial growth in research - to fill in the identified knowledge gaps, conduct evidence-based programming and facilitate policy dialogue. It also intendeds to achieve this through building its technical expertise and through the strengthening of its current partnerships while fostering new strategic linkages. To implement its activities over the next five years, EATGN works through a steering committee and country focal point organisations to find clarity, build concise momentum, develop agenda and work towards a common East African tax strategy for its membership in relation to current regional tax debates and policy-making processes. ABOUT TAXATION AND GENDER RESEARCH This study is a preliminary initiative to facilitate the conduct of gender research to understand tax inequality in Kenya. It hopes to spur interest from academia, policy makers, faith-based groups, private sector and civil society organisations (CSO), to understand and advocate for better tax policies within their spheres of influence to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs). EATGN gratefully acknowledges Christian Aid for generously supporting this initiative. Coordinator: Leonard Wanyama, Email: [email protected] ©East Africa Tax and Governance Network (2019) All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information or storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. As copyright holders, EATGN requests due acknowledgment and a copy of the publication under which this document is cited. ABSTRACT This study is a desk-based review that serves as a preliminary examination of taxation in the marginalised areas of Kenya. It hopes to begin understanding the manifestation of tax disparities through gender lenses by identifying the factors enhancing marginalisation of women and minority groups due to unfair tax regimes or bad governance; and pinpointing the forces behind resource leakages, and how women and other minority groups or communities are excluded within mitigating measures. The study ultimately aims to recommend relevant actions that should be taken by Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), faith actors, government and other stakeholders. It also aims to develop an initial strategy and plan of action to ensure gender mainstreaming in tax governance is realised. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The publication of this working paper was made possible through the efforts of Kenneth Okwaro and coordination of by Leonard Wanyama of EATGN. The brief could not have been made possible without the financial assistance of the Christian Aid and thanks to the support of Jane Machira Gender Advisor, Maureen Olyaro Programme Manager, and Charles Opiyo Programme Officer. The study also benefitted from comments and backing of: Alvin Mosioma, Jason Braganza, Jared Maranga of Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), Carol Othim of the Global Alliance for Tax Justice (GATJ) and Robert Maganga of the Oxfam Kenya office whose ideas helped in the shaping of the paper. A special appreciation goes to Okumba Miruka who took time to review the study, Martijn Van De Kerkhof of The University of Edinburgh for the last-minute edits, and to the entire TJNA team who assisted logistically thanks to the hosting of EATGN within its premises. Lastly, EATGN would like to express its gratitude to members of its steering committee: Cyrus Nkusi, Governance for Africa (Rwanda); Andrew Chikowore, formerly of ActionAid International (Tanzania), Regina Navuga, Southern and Eastern Africa Trade, Information and Negotiations Institute –SEATINI (Uganda); Emma Wanyonyi, International Institute for Legislative Affairs (IILA) and Prime Nkezumukama, Centre d’Appui aux Initiatives Locales de Développement et d’Assistance Vulnérables (CIDEP) Burundi for their guidance throughout this process. Finally, EATGN would also like to appreciate the support of Nelly Busingye of Publish What You Pay (PWYP) who previously served as the steering committee chair of the network. INTERSECTIONALITY,MARGINALISATION AND GENDER TAX INEQUALITY IN KENYA Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Tables............................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Tables............................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Acronyms...................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Acronyms...................................................................................................................................... 1.0. Introduction.................................................................................................................................56 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................................6 1.1. Background to the paper ............................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Background to the paper ............................................................................................................. 1.2. Objectives of this paper............................................................................................................... 66 1.1. Objectives of this paper............................................................................................................... 1.3. Methodology................................................................................................................................ 8 6 2.0. Gender tax justice in Kenya – A review of Literature................................................................. 9 2.1. A background to the tax system in Kenya .................................................................................. 9 2.2. Gender discontent: Unjust taxation and inequality.................................................................... 11 3.0. Intersectionality – A conceptual framework............................................................................... 13 3.1. A background to intersectionality...............................................................................................13 3.2. Strands of intersectionality.......................................................................................................... 14 3.3. Utility of intersectionality in gender tax justice analysis............................................................ 15 3.4. The nexus of intersectionality and marginalization in Kenya.....................................................15 4.0. Intersectionality and gender tax justice in Kenya.......................................................................16 4.1. Turkana – Colonial neglect and post-colonial marginalisation...................................................16 4.2. Wajir – A portrait of poverty........................................................................................................17 5.0. Determinants of intersectionality in taxation among marginalised women in Kenya................ 19 5.1. Unpaid care work by women...................................................................................................... 19 5.2. Inequitable distribution of resources, public goods and services especially those impacting women......................................................................................................................................... 20 5.3. Gender differences in consumption............................................................................................ 21 5.4. Gender differences in property rights and asset ownership........................................................ 21 5.5. Structure of the tax regime.......................................................................................................... 22 5.6. Exclusion of women and minorities in fiscal decision-making processes...................................22 6.0. Strategy and Plan of Action......................................................................................................... 23 6.1. Key issues emerging from the analysis regarding drivers of taxation intersectionality experienced women in Kenya....................................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Intersectional Feminist Approach
    GUIDING PRINCIPLE 1 AN INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST APPROACH An intersectional approach to feminism acknowledges that while women share similar experiences of discrimination, harassment, sexism, inequality and oppression on the basis of their sex and gender, not all women are equally disadvantaged or have equal access to resources, power and privilege. An intersectional approach to feminism requires analysis and action that is not only gendered, but considers how other forms of systemic oppression and discrimination – such as racism, homophobia, transphobia, biphobia or ableism – can intersect with and impact on women’s experiences of gender, inequality, discrimination, harassment, violence or abuse. In the context of addressing violence against women, an intersectional approach recognises that the way women experience gender and inequality can be different based on a range of other cultural, individual, historical, environmental or structural factors including (but not limited to) race, age, geographic location, sexual orientation, ability or class. This approach also recognises that the drivers, dynamics and impacts of violence women experience can be compounded and magnified by their experience of other forms of oppression and inequality, resulting in some groups of women experiencing higher rates and/or more severe forms of violence, or facing barriers to support and safety that other women do not experience. DVRCV stands in solidarity with and supports work that addresses other forms of discrimination and oppression. We actively promote and give voice to this work and support those leading it to consider gender in their approach, just as we consider how our work to address violence against women can challenge other forms of oppression that women experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality and Feminist Politics Yuval-Davis, Nira
    www.ssoar.info Intersectionality and Feminist Politics Yuval-Davis, Nira Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated Sie dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke conditions of use. vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Respect's Special Women's Rights Issue
    SPECIAL WOMEN’S RIGHTS ISSUE Celebrating 100 Years of the 19th Amendment A DIVERSITY NEWSLETTER PUBLISHED BY NEW JERSEY STATE BAR FOUNDATION Women’s Suffrage, 100 Years and Counting by Jodi L. Miller On August 18, 1920, the 19th Amendment, which granted suffrage to women, was ratified by the states. It was a stunning achievement, representing the single largest influx of voters to the electorate in American history. The Women’s Suffrage Movement had a long and difficult journey beginning suffrage. Ultimately, 68 women and 32 men, including Frederick Douglass, an in 1848 with the first women’s rights convention held in Seneca Falls, NY, led abolitionist and ardent supporter of women’s suffrage, would sign the by well-known suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott. Like all declaration. The notion that women would seek any type of equality to men, movements, it met with resistance, and it took many people from all walks of life especially the vote, was met with ridicule. and different backgrounds to achieve its ultimate goal. “All women made this happen—working women, immigrant Why the resistance? women, African American women,” says Dr. Betty Livingston “From the beginning the country has been a patriarchal Adams, a historian and former university professor. “Elite white society,” notes Dr. Livingston Adams. “In an all male electorate women could not have done this alone.” with wealthy men in power, why would they want to expand At that first women’s rights convention, the Declaration the franchise?” of Sentiments was introduced. It was based on the Declaration Men definitely made their displeasure about women’s of Independence and included 12 resolutions related to desire for the vote known.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing and Preventing Sexist Advertising
    — Addressing and preventing sexist advertising An analysis of local and global promising practice Abstract This research paper explores the efficacy of interventions that aim to address sexism or promote progressive gender representations in advertising, highlighting examples of local and global promising practice. Interventions to prevent or address sexist advertising may occur through several distinct mechanisms: legislative frameworks; self-regulatory and co-regulatory systems; the provision of educational resources to the broader community; industry initiatives to re-shape advertising culture and promote diverse, inclusive and ethical practice; and the exertion of influence on advertisers and regulators through consumer activism. The paper explores the strengths and limitations of each mechanism and illustrates interventions in practice through a variety of case studies. Critical to addressing sexist advertising is a whole of system approach with mutually reinforcing interventions that capitalise on different opportunities for influence. Concluding summations are offered throughout with a range of recommendations drawn from these at the end of the paper. Authors and researchers This research paper has been written and researched by: Dr Lauren Gurrieri, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, RMIT University Dr Rob Hoffman, Research Assistant, RMIT University This research is funded by Women’s Health Victoria as part of the Advertising (in)equality project and supported by the Victorian Government through its Free from Violence Innovation Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Pink Is the New Tax
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Communication Senior Capstones Senior Projects Fall 2020 Pink Is The New Tax Eliana Burns Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/senior_comm Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Burns, Eliana, "Pink Is The New Tax" (2020). Communication Senior Capstones. 1. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/senior_comm/1 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Senior Projects at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Senior Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eliana Burns Humboldt State University 2020 Department of Communications Pink Is The New Tax 1 Historically women in America have made colossal advances that have proven they are just as capable as men. Women had fought and continued to challenge the system since 1919 with the 19th Amendment giving them a right to vote. However, even with this crucial progression, womens’ oppression can be found all around us only in much more subtle ways such as “ the pink tax”. As of 2020 there are currently no federal laws to outlaw companies from charging different prices depending on which gender they are meant to be marketed to. This rhetorical analysis will first address the concept of gendered products, how the tax benefits from these products, and why gendering of products reinforce gender discrimination and stereotypes. A brief explanation as to why the tax is nicknamed “the tampon tax” is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesizing Research on Gender Biases and Intersectionality in Citation Analysis and Practices by Beth Mitchneck
    Synthesizing Research on Gender Biases and Intersectionality in Citation Analysis and Practices By Beth Mitchneck About the ARC Network Funded by the National Science Foundation ADVANCE Program, Award HRD-1740860, the ADVANCE Resource and Coordination (ARC) Network seeks to achieve gender equity for faculty in higher education science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. As the STEM equity brain trust, the ARC Network recognizes the achievements made so far while producing new perspectives, methods and interventions with an intersectional, intentional and inclusive lens. The leading advocate for women in STEM the Association for Women in Science (AWIS) serves as the backbone organization of the ARC Network. About the Virtual Visiting Scholars The Virtual Visiting Scholars (VVS) program provides a unique opportunity for select scholars across disciplines to pursue research meta-analysis, synthesis, and big data curation on topics crucial to STEM faculty equity. VVS analyze existing research and data, synthesizing different, sometimes competing, perspectives, frameworks, metrics, and outcomes to offer new insights and applications to the broader community. About the Author Dr. Beth Mitchneck is currently Professor Emerita in the School of Geography & Development at the University of Arizona. She has held numerous administrative positions including, most recently, vice provost for faculty success at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and at the University of Arizona associate dean for academic affairs of the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, interim vice provost for academic affairs, interim dean, and Faculty Associate to the Provost for the North Central Accreditation. She also was the lead program officer for the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE program to promote gender equity in academic STEM.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Invisible Government” and Conservative Tax Lobbying 1935–1936
    KORNHAUSER_PAGINATED (DO NOT DELETE) 5/3/2018 3:02 PM THE “INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT” AND CONSERVATIVE TAX LOBBYING 1935–1936 MARJORIE E. KORNHAUSER* “[M]ost legislation is fathered not by parties but by minority groups, and these groups maintain their pressure without ceasing.”1 I INTRODUCTION: LOBBYING AND TAXATION IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY Tax-collecting and lobbying may not be the oldest professions in the world, but both surely are strong competitors for next oldest. This universality—in both time and geography—attests to the essential roles taxation and lobbying play in all types of societies. Taxation’s ubiquity occurs because, in the long run, it provides governments the surest stream of necessary revenues. Lobbying’s universality derives from the human desire to obtain benefits from those in a position to bestow such favors. When the benefit directly affects a person’s wallet—as taxation surely does—the incentive to lobby is immense. In the United States, tax lobbying is nearly irresistible because both taxation and lobbying hold special places in American democracy and the American psyche. Anti-tax sentiment has deep-seated historic and mythic ties to American conceptions of democracy, liberty and patriotism.2 The link began with cries of “No Taxation without Representation” at the nation’s birth and remains strong today. Further strengthening the anti-tax and patriotism bond is the belief that taxes destroy federalism. Lowering taxes, in this view, starves the twin-headed beast of centralization and bureaucracy and prevents the federal government from stepping into unconstitutional state functions. Another link is a common belief that low taxation spurs that most American of traits and goals—individual enterprise and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality: T E Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community
    #Intersectionality: T e Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community Intersectionality, is the marrow within the bones of fem- Tegan Zimmerman (PhD, Comparative Literature, inism. Without it, feminism will fracture even further – University of Alberta) is an Assistant Professor of En- Roxane Gay (2013) glish/Creative Writing and Women’s Studies at Stephens College in Columbia, Missouri. A recent Visiting Fel- This article analyzes the term “intersectional- low in the Centre for Contemporary Women’s Writing ity” as defined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw (1989, and the Institute of Modern Languages Research at the 1991) in relation to the digital turn and, in doing so, University of London, Zimmerman specializes in con- considers how this concept is being employed by fourth temporary women’s historical fiction and contempo- wave feminists on Twitter. Presently, little scholarship rary gender theory. Her book Matria Redux: Caribbean has been devoted to fourth wave feminism and its en- Women’s Historical Fiction, forthcoming from North- gagement with intersectionality; however, some notable western University Press, examines the concepts of ma- critics include Kira Cochrane, Michelle Goldberg, Mik- ternal history and maternal genealogy. ki Kendall, Ealasaid Munro, Lola Okolosie, and Roop- ika Risam.1 Intersectionality, with its consideration of Abstract class, race, age, ability, sexuality, and gender as inter- This article analyzes the term “intersectionality” as de- secting loci of discriminations or privileges, is now the fined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in relation to the overriding principle among today’s feminists, manifest digital turn: it argues that intersectionality is the dom- by theorizing tweets and hashtags on Twitter. Because inant framework being employed by fourth wave fem- fourth wave feminism, more so than previous feminist inists and that is most apparent on social media, espe- movements, focuses on and takes up online technolo- cially on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Anti-Racist Intersectional Frame at CSSP
    Using an Anti-Racist Intersectional Frame at CSSP I. Definitions Central to using a frame, is developing a shared language. The following breaks down individual concepts as a means to better understand what an anti-racist intersectional frame entails. • Anti-racism is the active process of identifying and challenging racism, by changing systems, organizational structures, policies and practices, and attitudes to redistribute power in an equitable manner. • Anti-Black Racism is any attitude behavior, practice, or policy that explicitly or implicitly reflects the belief that Black people are inferior to another racial group. Anti-Black racism is reflected in interpersonal, institutional, and systemic levels of racism and is a function of White supremacy • A racist idea is any concept that regards one racial group as inferior or superior to another racial group in any way. • Intersectionality is a concept and frame coined by Professor Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989, to describe the ways in which race, class, gender, and other aspects of our identity “intersect” overlap and interact with one another, informing the way in which individuals simultaneously experience oppression and privilege in their daily lives interpersonally and systemically. Intersectionality promotes the idea that aspects of our identity do not work in a silo. Intersectionality, then, provides a basis for understanding how these individual identity markers work with one another. II. Using an anti-racist intersectional frame Operationalizing anti-racism, anti-Black racism, racist ideas, and intersectionality, an anti-racist intersectional frame recognizes all the different ways people and communities experience racism with respect to their identities. An anti-racist frame also recognizes that racism in the United States is grounded in and motivated by anti-Black racism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Era Campaign and Menstrual Equity
    THE ERA CAMPAIGN AND MENSTRUAL EQUITY Jennifer Weiss-Wolf¥ A robust national campaign for the Equal Rights Amendment conceded defeat in 1982 when ratification fell short by three of the 38 states needed to prevail. But in 2017, the Nevada legislature cast its vote to ratify the ERA, followed by Illinois in 2018, marking a revival. Now national movement leaders and legislators in several states—notably, Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia—are rallying to achieve the 38-state threshold.1 Over the nearly four decades in between, of course, much has changed in American life and law. The fight for gender equality under the law has made significant headway—from the evolution of Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence in sex discrimination cases, to advances in employment and economic policies, to the now vibrant and potent era of activism defined by campaigns like #MeToo and #TIMESUP. Well beyond the symbolic significance of enshrining gender equality in the Constitution, there are lingering legal and policy inequities the ERA would help rectify—among these, workplace discrimination, including on account of pregnancy; paid family leave; and increased protection from violence and harassment. Other benefits include the ability of Congress to enforce gender equality through legislation and, more generally, creation of a social framework to formally acknowledge systemic biases that permeate and often limit women’s daily experiences. There is one issue, in particular—an emerging area of U.S. policymaking— that falls squarely at the intersection of these goals and outcomes, but is largely absent from ERA discourse thus far: menstruation and the emerging movement for “menstrual equity.” This essay describes the progress of that agenda through policy advocacy, litigation, and social activism, and explains why menstrual equity belongs in discourse about—and will be an invaluable asset for—the campaign to ratify the ERA.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE to a BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran
    EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE TO A BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran Years ago, some feminist on the internet told me I was "Privileged." "WTH?!?" I said. I came from the kind of Poor that people don't want to believe still exists in this country. Have you ever spent a frigid northern Illinois winter without heat or running water? I have. At twelve years old, were you making ramen noodles in a coffee maker with water you fetched from a public bathroom? I was. Have you ever lived in a camper year round and used a random relative's apartment as your mailing address? We did. Did you attend so many different elementary schools that you can only remember a quarter of their names? Welcome to my childhood. So when that feminist told me I had "white privilege," I told her that my white skin didn't do shit to prevent me from experiencing poverty. Then, like any good, educated feminist would, she directed me to Peggy McIntosh's 1988 now-famous piece, "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack." After one reads McIntosh's powerful essay, it's impossible to deny that being born with white skin in America affords people certain unearned privileges in life that people of another skin color simple are not afforded. For example: "I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented." "When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is." "If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race." "I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time." If you read through the rest of the list, you can see how white people and people of color experience the world in two very different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Intersectionality, Simmel and the Dialectical Critique of Society'
    From interacting systems to a system of divisions ANGOR UNIVERSITY Stoetzler, Marcel European Journal of Social Theory DOI: 10.1177/1368431016647970 PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 01/11/2017 Peer reviewed version Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Stoetzler, M. (2017). From interacting systems to a system of divisions: The concept of society and the ‘mutual constitution’ of intersecting social divisions. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(4), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016647970 Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 30. Sep. 2021 From interacting systems to a system of divisions: the concept of society and the ‘mutual constitution’ of intersecting social divisions Abstract: This article examines a fundamental theoretical aspect of the discourse on ‘intersectionality’ in feminist and anti-racist social theory, namely the question whether intersecting social divisions including those of sex, gender, race, class and sexuality are interacting but independent entities with autonomous ontological bases or whether they are different dimensions of the same social system that lack separate social ontologies and constitute each other.
    [Show full text]