DOCSLIB.ORG

Gender Inequality, Intersectionality, and Violence Against Women

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gender Inequality, Intersectionality, and Violence Against Women University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 10-18-2017 Gender Inequality, Intersectionality, and Violence Against Women: A National- and State-level Analysis of Violence Against Women Trends CheyOnna Sewell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Sewell, CheyOnna, "Gender Inequality, Intersectionality, and Violence Against Women: A National- and State-level Analysis of Violence Against Women Trends" (2017). Dissertations. 743. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/743 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gender Inequality, Intersectionality, and Violence Against Women: A National- and State-level Analysis of Violence Against Women Trends CheyOnna Sewell M.A. in Criminology and Criminal Justice, May, 2012, University of Missouri-St. Louis B.A. in Criminal Justice and Criminology, May, 2010, University of Missouri-Kansas City A Dissertation Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology and Criminal Justice May 2018 Advisory Committee: Janet Lauritsen, Ph.D. Chairperson Karlijn Kuijpers, Ph.D. Lee Slocum, Ph.D. Hillary Potter, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Chapter Two: Theoretical and Literature Review .............................................................. 8 Defining Violence Against Women ................................................................................ 8 Hypotheses and Empirical Support ............................................................................... 13 Intersectionality and Violence Against Women ........................................................... 26 Chapter Three: Current Study ........................................................................................... 30 Research Questions ....................................................................................................... 30 Hypotheses .................................................................................................................... 32 Hypothesis for Research Question 2 ......................................................................... 37 Hypothesis for Research Question 3 ......................................................................... 40 Hypothesis for Research Question 4 ......................................................................... 45 Chapter Four: Data and Methods ...................................................................................... 50 National-Level .............................................................................................................. 50 Variables and Data .................................................................................................... 51 Analyses .................................................................................................................... 60 Chapter Five: National-Level Analyses ............................................................................ 63 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 63 Descriptive Statistics ..................................................................................................... 65 Violence Against Women Trends ............................................................................. 66 Status Trends ............................................................................................................. 78 Findings......................................................................................................................... 82 Total Women ............................................................................................................ 82 White Women ........................................................................................................... 89 Black Women ........................................................................................................... 93 Hispanic Women ....................................................................................................... 99 Cross-racial comparisons ........................................................................................ 102 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 104 Chapter Six: State-Level Analyses ................................................................................. 107 ii Descriptive Statistics ................................................................................................... 108 Findings....................................................................................................................... 114 Total Women .......................................................................................................... 115 White Women ......................................................................................................... 116 Black Women.......................................................................................................... 118 Cross-racial Comparisons ....................................................................................... 121 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 123 Chapter Seven: Discussion and Conclusion ................................................................... 126 Standard Hypotheses ................................................................................................... 127 National-Level ........................................................................................................ 128 State-Level .............................................................................................................. 135 Intersectionality........................................................................................................... 139 The Future of Gender Inequality and Violence against Women Research ................. 141 References ....................................................................................................................... 151 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................... 157 Appendix B ..................................................................................................................... 159 Appendix C ..................................................................................................................... 167 Appendix D ..................................................................................................................... 171 Appendix E ..................................................................................................................... 200 Appendix F...................................................................................................................... 222 Appendix G ..................................................................................................................... 228 iii ABSTRACT Violence against women declined with other forms of violence during the 1990s. Nevertheless, the most popular macro-level theory regarding violence against women, which suggests that changes in gender inequality are associated with changes in the level of violence against women, has been studied primarily cross-sectionally and with mixed findings. In fact, the nature of the relationship between gender inequality and violence against women is undecided. One hypothesis, amelioration, suggests that as gender inequality decreases, and the genders become more equal, violence against women will also decrease (the inverse is also true that as gender inequality increases, violence against women will also increase). Another hypothesis, backlash, suggests that as gender inequality decreases, and the genders become more equal, violence against women will increase. Amidst the mixed findings have been notable conclusions that have found that the relationship may be race-specific and/or dependent on the victim-offender relationship. This project uses the intersectionality perspective, as introduced by Black Feminist scholars to take into account these important findings and thoroughly investigate the relationship between gender inequality and violence against women. I use multiple datasets, investigate fatal and non-fatal forms of violence against women, investigate the relationship at the national- and state-level, incorporate race-specific trends of violence against women, and use gender inequality indicators that are informed by intersectionality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Intersectional Feminist Approach
    GUIDING PRINCIPLE 1 AN INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST APPROACH An intersectional approach to feminism acknowledges that while women share similar experiences of discrimination, harassment, sexism, inequality and oppression on the basis of their sex and gender, not all women are equally disadvantaged or have equal access to resources, power and privilege. An intersectional approach to feminism requires analysis and action that is not only gendered, but considers how other forms of systemic oppression and discrimination – such as racism, homophobia, transphobia, biphobia or ableism – can intersect with and impact on women’s experiences of gender, inequality, discrimination, harassment, violence or abuse. In the context of addressing violence against women, an intersectional approach recognises that the way women experience gender and inequality can be different based on a range of other cultural, individual, historical, environmental or structural factors including (but not limited to) race, age, geographic location, sexual orientation, ability or class. This approach also recognises that the drivers, dynamics and impacts of violence women experience can be compounded and magnified by their experience of other forms of oppression and inequality, resulting in some groups of women experiencing higher rates and/or more severe forms of violence, or facing barriers to support and safety that other women do not experience. DVRCV stands in solidarity with and supports work that addresses other forms of discrimination and oppression. We actively promote and give voice to this work and support those leading it to consider gender in their approach, just as we consider how our work to address violence against women can challenge other forms of oppression that women experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality and Feminist Politics Yuval-Davis, Nira
    www.ssoar.info Intersectionality and Feminist Politics Yuval-Davis, Nira Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated Sie dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke conditions of use. vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Complexities of Feminist Perspectives.Pdf
    UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITIES OF FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON WOMAN ABUSE: A COMMENTARY ON DONALD G. DUTTON’S RETHINKING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE* Walter S. DeKeseredy, Ph.D. Criminology, Justice and Policy Studies University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4 [email protected] Molly Dragiewicz, Ph.D. Criminology, Justice and Policy Studies University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4 [email protected] *The authors would like to thank Edward G. Gondolf and Claire Renzetti for their helpful comments and criticisms. Please send all correspondence to Walter DeKeseredy, e-mail: [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITIES OF FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON WOMAN ABUSE: A COMMENTARY ON DONALD G. DUTTON’S RETHINKING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE All books, including Donald G. Dutton’s (2006) Rethinking Domestic Violence, are written and published in a specific political and economic context. As vividly described by Faludi (1991), Hammer (2002), and many others who made progressive contributions to an interdisciplinary understanding of the enduring discrimination against contemporary North American women, we still live in a climate characterized by vitriolic attacks on feminist scholarship, practice, and activism, intended to secure women’s basic human rights (DeKeseredy & Schwartz, 2003; Stanko, 2006). Despite its title, Dutton’s new book doesn’t focus on rethinking domestic violence. Instead, it is another example of the conservative backlash against feminism in general and feminist research on woman abuse in particular, a response that “helps to veil the extent and brutality of this problem and to block efforts to deal with it” (Hammer, 2002, p. 5). Dutton’s preoccupation with feminism is reflected in entire chapters dedicated to criticizing feminist theory and research, and the book’s “Bottom Line” summary, where half of the main points concern Dutton’s interpretation of feminism rather than new insights about domestic violence research.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesizing Research on Gender Biases and Intersectionality in Citation Analysis and Practices by Beth Mitchneck
    Synthesizing Research on Gender Biases and Intersectionality in Citation Analysis and Practices By Beth Mitchneck About the ARC Network Funded by the National Science Foundation ADVANCE Program, Award HRD-1740860, the ADVANCE Resource and Coordination (ARC) Network seeks to achieve gender equity for faculty in higher education science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. As the STEM equity brain trust, the ARC Network recognizes the achievements made so far while producing new perspectives, methods and interventions with an intersectional, intentional and inclusive lens. The leading advocate for women in STEM the Association for Women in Science (AWIS) serves as the backbone organization of the ARC Network. About the Virtual Visiting Scholars The Virtual Visiting Scholars (VVS) program provides a unique opportunity for select scholars across disciplines to pursue research meta-analysis, synthesis, and big data curation on topics crucial to STEM faculty equity. VVS analyze existing research and data, synthesizing different, sometimes competing, perspectives, frameworks, metrics, and outcomes to offer new insights and applications to the broader community. About the Author Dr. Beth Mitchneck is currently Professor Emerita in the School of Geography & Development at the University of Arizona. She has held numerous administrative positions including, most recently, vice provost for faculty success at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and at the University of Arizona associate dean for academic affairs of the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, interim vice provost for academic affairs, interim dean, and Faculty Associate to the Provost for the North Central Accreditation. She also was the lead program officer for the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE program to promote gender equity in academic STEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Women
    Violence Against Women http://vaw.sagepub.com Gender Equality and Women’s Absolute Status: A Test of the Feminist Models of Rape Kimberly Martin, Lynne M. Vieraitis and Sarah Britto VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 2006; 12; 321 DOI: 10.1177/1077801206286311 The online version of this article can be found at: http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/4/321 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Violence Against Women can be found at: Email Alerts: http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://vaw.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations (this article cites 6 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/4/321#BIBL Downloaded from http://vaw.sagepub.com by Susan Miner on February 26, 2007 © 2006 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized distribution. Violence Against Women Volume 12 Number 4 10.1177/1077801206286311ViolenceMartin et Againstal. / Gender W omen Equality and W omen’s Status April 2006 321-339 © 2006 Sage Publications 10.1177/1077801206286311 Gender Equality and http://vaw.sagepub.com hosted at Women’s Absolute Status http://online.sagepub.com A Test of the Feminist Models of Rape Kimberly Martin University of Missouri, St. Louis Lynne M. Vieraitis University of Alabama at Birmingham Sarah Britto Central Washington University Feminist theory predicts both a positive and negative relationship between gender equal- ity and rape rates. Although liberal and radical feminist theory predicts that gender equal- ity should ameliorate rape victimization, radical feminist theorists have argued that gen- der equality may increase rape in the form of male backlash.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Gender-Based Violence, Sexual Harassment and Everyday Sexism
    Feminist Pocketbook TIP SHEET #3: Connecting gender-based violence, sexual harassment and everyday sexism The Coalition of Feminists for Social Change (COFEM), created in 2017 to reassert a feminist perspective in violence against women and girls (VAWG) work, is a collective of activists, academics, and practi- tioners working globally to end VAWG. This Tip Sheet is part of the COFEM Feminist Pocketbook. For access to the full Pocketbook, go to: www.cofemsocialchange.org. Tip Sheet 3 explores how gender-based violence, sexual harassment and everyday sexism are related, and discusses potential actions for a holistic approach to building gender equality. Key points • Everyday sexism, sexual harassment and other forms of gender-based violence (GBV) all share a root cause — gender inequality and the oppression of women and girls. • Feminist movements and women’s collective voices show that women across the world experience multiple forms of violence throughout their lives. • Distinguishing different forms of GBV as ‘more serious’ than others ignores how patriarchy and gender inequality create a culture in which violence against women and girls is accepted and normalised. What is the issue? have been shared through collective actions such For several decades, GBV1 has been recognised as the #MeToo movement, facilitated by social me- as a serious global health epidemic and a breach dia and an increasing global connectedness. This of women’s basic human rights. Over the last 20 powerful movement, which has empowered many years, a growing body of data on the scope of the women to speak out for the first time, has provid- problem — and evidence demonstrating how GBV ed even further evidence of the scope of GBV and is driven by gender inequality — have given great- resulted in increased calls for accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Women in Africa
    ISSN 15543897 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY & JUSTICE STUDIES: AJCJS; Volume 2, No. 1, June 2006 VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN AFRICA Godpower O. Okereke, Ph.D. Professor of Criminal Justice and Sociology Texas A&M University-Texarkana 2600 N. Robison Road Texarkana, Texas 75501 Abstract The United Nations’ report on the State of the World Population 2000 (United Nations, 2000b) and studies conducted by the World Health Organization (2000a) and Amnesty International (2004) all indicate that violence against women is rampant in Africa and is increasing in some areas. The following study is an effort to highlight some of the reasons why violence against women is particularly problematic in African. The study reveals that violence against women in Africa is mainly due to the existence of discriminatory laws, prejudicial and harmful customs, traditions, beliefs and practices, and partly due to non-enforcement of gender-sensitive laws and constitutional provisions that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex. Based on these findings the author argues that a review of such discriminatory laws, enforcement of existing legislations and constitutional provisions coupled with public awareness campaigns on the part of African governments to inform the public about the ills of certain customs, Violence Against Women Godpower Okereke. traditions, beliefs and practices will help stem the tide of violence against women in Africa. Background: In a statement to the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China in September 1995, the then Secretary-General of the United Nations, Boutros Boutros-Ghali said that violence against women is a universal problem that must be universally condemned (United Nations, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality: T E Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community
    #Intersectionality: T e Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community Intersectionality, is the marrow within the bones of fem- Tegan Zimmerman (PhD, Comparative Literature, inism. Without it, feminism will fracture even further – University of Alberta) is an Assistant Professor of En- Roxane Gay (2013) glish/Creative Writing and Women’s Studies at Stephens College in Columbia, Missouri. A recent Visiting Fel- This article analyzes the term “intersectional- low in the Centre for Contemporary Women’s Writing ity” as defined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw (1989, and the Institute of Modern Languages Research at the 1991) in relation to the digital turn and, in doing so, University of London, Zimmerman specializes in con- considers how this concept is being employed by fourth temporary women’s historical fiction and contempo- wave feminists on Twitter. Presently, little scholarship rary gender theory. Her book Matria Redux: Caribbean has been devoted to fourth wave feminism and its en- Women’s Historical Fiction, forthcoming from North- gagement with intersectionality; however, some notable western University Press, examines the concepts of ma- critics include Kira Cochrane, Michelle Goldberg, Mik- ternal history and maternal genealogy. ki Kendall, Ealasaid Munro, Lola Okolosie, and Roop- ika Risam.1 Intersectionality, with its consideration of Abstract class, race, age, ability, sexuality, and gender as inter- This article analyzes the term “intersectionality” as de- secting loci of discriminations or privileges, is now the fined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in relation to the overriding principle among today’s feminists, manifest digital turn: it argues that intersectionality is the dom- by theorizing tweets and hashtags on Twitter. Because inant framework being employed by fourth wave fem- fourth wave feminism, more so than previous feminist inists and that is most apparent on social media, espe- movements, focuses on and takes up online technolo- cially on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Anti-Racist Intersectional Frame at CSSP
    Using an Anti-Racist Intersectional Frame at CSSP I. Definitions Central to using a frame, is developing a shared language. The following breaks down individual concepts as a means to better understand what an anti-racist intersectional frame entails. • Anti-racism is the active process of identifying and challenging racism, by changing systems, organizational structures, policies and practices, and attitudes to redistribute power in an equitable manner. • Anti-Black Racism is any attitude behavior, practice, or policy that explicitly or implicitly reflects the belief that Black people are inferior to another racial group. Anti-Black racism is reflected in interpersonal, institutional, and systemic levels of racism and is a function of White supremacy • A racist idea is any concept that regards one racial group as inferior or superior to another racial group in any way. • Intersectionality is a concept and frame coined by Professor Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989, to describe the ways in which race, class, gender, and other aspects of our identity “intersect” overlap and interact with one another, informing the way in which individuals simultaneously experience oppression and privilege in their daily lives interpersonally and systemically. Intersectionality promotes the idea that aspects of our identity do not work in a silo. Intersectionality, then, provides a basis for understanding how these individual identity markers work with one another. II. Using an anti-racist intersectional frame Operationalizing anti-racism, anti-Black racism, racist ideas, and intersectionality, an anti-racist intersectional frame recognizes all the different ways people and communities experience racism with respect to their identities. An anti-racist frame also recognizes that racism in the United States is grounded in and motivated by anti-Black racism.
    [Show full text]
  • ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION and SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE in COLLEGE WOMEN Marina Leigh Costanzo
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN Marina Leigh Costanzo Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Recommended Citation Costanzo, Marina Leigh, "ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11264. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11264 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN By MARINA LEIGH COSTANZO B.A., University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2010 M.A., University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO, 2013 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Clinical Psychology The University of Montana Missoula, MT August 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Christine Fiore, Chair Psychology Laura Kirsch Psychology Jennifer Robohm Psychology Gyda Swaney Psychology Sara Hayden Communication Studies INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION AND SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE ii Costanzo, Marina, PhD, Summer 2018 Clinical Psychology Abstract Chairperson: Christine Fiore Sexualized violence on college campuses has recently entered the media spotlight. One in five women are sexually assaulted during college and over 90% of these women know their attackers (Black et al., 2011; Cleere & Lynn, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE to a BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran
    EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE TO A BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran Years ago, some feminist on the internet told me I was "Privileged." "WTH?!?" I said. I came from the kind of Poor that people don't want to believe still exists in this country. Have you ever spent a frigid northern Illinois winter without heat or running water? I have. At twelve years old, were you making ramen noodles in a coffee maker with water you fetched from a public bathroom? I was. Have you ever lived in a camper year round and used a random relative's apartment as your mailing address? We did. Did you attend so many different elementary schools that you can only remember a quarter of their names? Welcome to my childhood. So when that feminist told me I had "white privilege," I told her that my white skin didn't do shit to prevent me from experiencing poverty. Then, like any good, educated feminist would, she directed me to Peggy McIntosh's 1988 now-famous piece, "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack." After one reads McIntosh's powerful essay, it's impossible to deny that being born with white skin in America affords people certain unearned privileges in life that people of another skin color simple are not afforded. For example: "I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented." "When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is." "If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race." "I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time." If you read through the rest of the list, you can see how white people and people of color experience the world in two very different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Intersectionality, Simmel and the Dialectical Critique of Society'
    From interacting systems to a system of divisions ANGOR UNIVERSITY Stoetzler, Marcel European Journal of Social Theory DOI: 10.1177/1368431016647970 PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 01/11/2017 Peer reviewed version Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Stoetzler, M. (2017). From interacting systems to a system of divisions: The concept of society and the ‘mutual constitution’ of intersecting social divisions. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(4), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016647970 Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 30. Sep. 2021 From interacting systems to a system of divisions: the concept of society and the ‘mutual constitution’ of intersecting social divisions Abstract: This article examines a fundamental theoretical aspect of the discourse on ‘intersectionality’ in feminist and anti-racist social theory, namely the question whether intersecting social divisions including those of sex, gender, race, class and sexuality are interacting but independent entities with autonomous ontological bases or whether they are different dimensions of the same social system that lack separate social ontologies and constitute each other.
    [Show full text]