DOCSLIB.ORG

The Workshop Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Workshop Programme The Workshop Programme Sunday, May 30th 2004 Invited talks 9:00 – 9:30 Thomas Hanke HamNoSys – Representing Sign Language Data in Language Resources and Language Processing Contexts 9:30 – 10:00 Carol Neidle, Robert G. Lee Corpus Annotation, SignStream 10:00 – 10:30 Richard Gleaves, Valerie Sutton SignWriter 10:30 – 11:00 Break 11:00 – 12:30 Oral presentations (I session) 11:00 – 11:30 Galini Sapountzaki, Eleni Efthimiou, Costas Karpouzis, Vassilis Kourbetis Open-ended Resources in Greek Sign Language: Development of an e- Learning Platform 11:30 – 12:00 Onno Crasborn, Els van der Kooij, Daan Broeder, Hennie Brugman Sharing sign language corpora online: proposals for transcription and metadata categories 12:00 – 12:30 Matt Huenerfauth Spatial Representation of Classifier Predicates for Machine Translation into American Sign Language 12:30 – 14:00 Lunch Oral presentations (II session) 14:00 – 14:30 Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa, Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro, Juliano Baldez de Freitas A Sign Matching Technique to Support Searches in Sign Language Texts 14:30 – 15:00 Angel Herrero A Practical Writing System for Sign Languages 15:00 – 15:30 Maria Papadogiorgaki, Nikos Grammalidis, Nikos Sarris, Michael G. Strintzis Synthesis of Virtual Reality Animations from SWML using MPEG-4 Body Animation Parameters 15:30 – 16:00 Coffee Break I 16:00 – 18:00 Poster session Eleni Efthimiou, Anna Vacalopoulou, Stavroula Evita Fotinea, Gregory Steinhauer Multipurpose Design and Creation of GSL Dictionaries Chiara Vettori, Oliver Streiter, Judith Knapp From Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) to Sign Language Processing: the Design of E-LIS, an Electronic Bilingual Dictionary of Italian Sign Language and Italian Rubén Nogueira, Jose M. Martínez 19th Century Signs in the Online Spanish Sign Language Library: the Historical Dictionary Project Elana Ochse A language via two others: learning English through LIS Ingvild Roald Making Dictionaries of Technical Signs: from Paper and Glue through SW- DOS to SignBank Steven Aerts, Bart Braem, Katrien Van Mulders, Kristof De Weerdt Searching SignWriting Signs Inge Zwitserlood, Doeko Hekstra Sign Printing System – SignPS Boris Lenseigne, Frédérick Gianni, Patrice Dalle A New Gesture Representation for Sign Language Analysis Jose L. Hernandez – Rebollar Phonetic Model for Automatic Recognition of Hand Gestures Daniel Thomas Ulrich Noelpp Development of a New „SignWriter“ Program Ralph Elliott, John Glauert, Vince Jennings, Richard Kennaway An Overview of the SiGML Notation and SiGMLSigning Software System Jan Bungeroth, Hermann Ney Statistical Sign Language Translation Guylhem Aznar, Patrice Dalle Computer Support for SignWriting Written Form of Sign Language Yiqiang Chen, Wen Gao, Changshui Yang, Dalong Jiang, Cunbao Ge Chinese Sign Language Synthesis and Its Applications Paola Laterza, Claudio Baj Progetto e-LIS@ II Workshop Organisers - Oliver Streiter, Research Area “Language and Law” - European Academy of Bolzano, Italy - Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa, Escola de Informática - Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Brazil - Christian Retoré, Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique, France - Chiara Vettori, Research Area “Language and Law” - European Academy of Bolzano, Italy Workshop Programme Committee - Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa, Escola de Informática - Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Brazil - Carol Neidle, Department of Modern Foreign Languages and Literatures - Boston University, Boston MA - Chiara Vettori, Research Area “Language and Law” - European Academy of Bolzano, Italy - Christian Retoré, Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique, France - Eva Safar, School of Computing Sciences - University of East Anglia, Norwich, England - Ian Marshall, School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Englan - Marco Consolati, Cooperativa Alba, Torino, Italy - Oliver Streiter, Research Area “Language and Law” - European Academy of Bolzano, Italy - Patrice Dalle, Équipe "Traitement et Compréhension d'Images", IRIT - Université Paul Sabatier, France III Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................i Thomas Hanke HamNoSys – Representing Sign Language Data in Language Resources and Language Processing Contexts...............................................................................................................................................1 Richard Gleaves, Valerie Sutton SignWriter ...........................................................................................................................................7 Galini Sapountzaki, Eleni Efthimiou, Costas Karpouzis, Vassilis Kourbetis Open-ended Resources in Greek Sign Language: Development of an e-Learning Platform ...........13 Onno Crasborn, Els van der Kooij, Daan Broeder, Hennie Brugman Sharing sign language corpora online: proposals for transcription and metadata categories .......20 Matt Huenerfauth Spatial Representation of Classifier Predicates for Machine Translation into American Sign Language...........................................................................................................................................24 Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa, Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro, Juliano Baldez de Freitas A Sign Matching Technique to Support Searches in Sign Language Texts .....................................32 Angel Herrero A Practical Writing System for Sign Languages...............................................................................37 Maria Papadogiorgaki, Nikos Grammalidis, Nikos Sarris, Michael G. Strintzis Synthesis of Virtual Reality Animations from SWML using MPEG-4 Body Animation Parameters........................................................................................................................................43 Eleni Efthimiou, Anna Vacalopoulou, Stavroula Evita Fotinea, Gregory Steinhauer Multipurpose Design and Creation of GSL Dictionaries .................................................................51 Chiara Vettori, Oliver Streiter, Judith Knapp From Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) to Sign Language Processing: the Design of E-LIS, an Electronic Bilingual Dictionary of Italian Sign Language and Italian............................59 IV Rubén Nogueira, Jose M. Martínez 19th Century Signs in the Online Spanish Sign Language Library:the Historical Dictionary Project ...........................................................................................................................................................63 Elana Ochse A language via two others: learning English through LIS ...............................................................68 Ingvild Roald Making Dictionaries of Technical Signs: from Paper and Glue through SW-DOS to SignBank.....75 Steven Aerts, Bart Braem, Katrien Van Mulders, Kristof De Weerdt Searching SignWriting Signs ............................................................................................................79 Inge Zwitserlood, Doeko Hekstra Sign Printing System – SignPS..........................................................................................................82 Boris Lenseigne, Frédérick Gianni, Patrice Dalle A New Gesture Representation for Sign Language Analysis............................................................85 Jose L. Hernandez - Rebollar Phonetic Model for Automatic Recognition of Hand Gestures.........................................................91 Daniel Thomas Ulrich Noelpp Development of a New „SignWriter“ Program................................................................................95 Ralph Elliott, John Glauert, Vince Jennings, Richard Kennaway An Overview of the SiGML Notation and SiGMLSigning Software System .....................................98 Jan Bungeroth, Hermann Ney Statistical Sign Language Translation............................................................................................105 Guylhem Aznar, Patrice Dalle Computer Support for SignWriting Written Form of Sign Language.............................................109 Yiqiang Chen, Wen Gao, Changshui Yang, Dalong Jiang, Cunbao Ge Chinese Sign Language Synthesis and Its Applications..................................................................111 Paola Laterza, Claudio Baj Progetto e-LIS@ .............................................................................................................................113 V Author Index Aerts, Steven ........................................................................................................................................79 Aznar, Guylhem.................................................................................................................................109 Baj, Claudio .......................................................................................................................................113 Baldez de Freitas, Juliano ....................................................................................................................32 Braem, Bart ..........................................................................................................................................79 Broeder, Daan ......................................................................................................................................20 Brugman, Hennie .................................................................................................................................20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series
    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Issue In
    Theory and Practice in Language Studies ISSN 1799-2591 Volume 9, Number 11, November 2019 Contents REGULAR PAPERS Adoption of Electronic Techniques in Teaching English-Yoruba Bilingual Youths the Semantic 1369 Expansion and Etymology of Yoruba Words and Statements B T Opoola and A F, Opoola EFL Instructors’ Performance Evaluation at University Level: Prescriptive and Collaborative 1379 Approaches Thaer Issa Tawalbeh Lexico-grammatical Analysis of Native and Non-native Abstracts Based on Halliday’s SFL Model 1388 Massome Raeisi, Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi, and Mina Raeisi A Corpus-based 3M Approach to the Teaching of English Unaccusative Verbs 1396 Junhua Mo A Study on Object-oriented Adverbials in Mandarin from a Cognitive Perspective 1403 Linze Li Integrating Multiple Intelligences in the EFL Syllabus: Content Analysis 1410 Salameh S. Mahmoud and Mamoon M. Alaraj A Spatial Analysis of Isabel Archer in The Portrait of a Lady 1418 Chenying Bai Is the Spreading of Internet Neologisms Netizen-Driven or Meme-driven? Diachronic and Synchronic 1424 Study of Chinese Internet Neologism Tuyang Tusen Po Zongwei Song Recreating the Image of a “Chaste Wife”: Transitivity in Two Translations of Chinese Ancient Poem 1433 Jie Fu Yin Shilong Tao Evokers of the Divine Message: Mysticism of American Transcendentalism in Emerson’s “Nature” 1442 and the Mystic Thought in Rumi’s Masnavi Amirali Ansari and Hossein Jahantigh 1449 Huaiyu Mu Analysis on Linguistic Art of Broadcasting in the New Media Era 1454 Chunli Wang A Critical Evaluation of Krashen’s Monitor Model 1459 Wen Lai and Lifang Wei ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Lexical Variation, Comprehension and Language
    A Study of Lexical Variation, Comprehension and Language Attitudes in Deaf Users of Chinese Sign Language (CSL) from Beijing and Shanghai Yunyi Ma UCL Ph.D. in Psychology and Language Science I, Yunyi Ma, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. The ethics for this project have been approved by UCL’s Ethics Committee (Project ID Number: EPI201503). Signed: ii Abstract Regional variation between the Beijing and Shanghai varieties, particularly at the lexical level, has been observed by sign language researchers in China (Fischer & Gong, 2010; Shen, 2008; Yau, 1977). However, few investigations into the variation in Chinese Sign Language (CSL) from a sociolinguistic perspective have previously been undertaken. The current study is the first to systematically study sociolinguistic variation in CSL signers’ production and comprehension of lexical signs as well as their language attitudes. This thesis consists of three studies. The first study investigates the lexical variation between Beijing and Shanghai varieties. Results of analyses show that age, region and semantic category are the factors influencing lexical variation in Beijing and Shanghai signs. To further explore the findings of lexical variation, a lexical recognition task was undertaken with Beijing and Shanghai signers in a second study looking at mutual comprehension of lexical signs used in Beijing and Shanghai varieties. The results demonstrate that Beijing participants were able to understand more Shanghai signs than Shanghai participants could understand Beijing signs. Historical contact is proposed in the study as a possible major cause for the asymmetrical intelligibility between the two varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Diverse and Localised Tibetan Sign Language Was Consolidated, Standardised and Promoted by the Tibet Deaf Association?
    “MAKING IT WORK!” Good Practice case study How the diverse and localised Tibetan Sign Language was consolidated, standardised and promoted by the Tibet Deaf Association? Title: Tibetan Sign Language Development and Promotion Organization/project: Tibet Deaf Association Location: Lhasa and Shigatse Prefectures, TAR - CHINA Scope: Regional (Tibet Autonomous Region) Related articles of the UNCRPD This practice relates to articles 21, 24, 30 concerning the freedom of expression and opinion, and access to information ; education; participation in cultural life, recreation, leisure and sport. Related articles of the China National Law of the Protection of Persons with Disabilities (2008) This practice relates to : Article 29 “Government department concerned shall organize and support the research and application of (…) sign language.” Article 47 (3) “ Offer TV programs in sign language, (…) add subtitles or narrations to more TV programs and movie. Article 55 (…) “ in public services, information in sign language shall be made available to persons with disabilities”. LOCAL CULTURE EDUCATION -EQUAL OPPORTUNITY- INNOVATION TIBETAN SIGN LANGUAGE INCLUSION – ACCESSIBILITY Promotion of the Tibetan Sign Language dictionary 4th Key words Edition Background and context Social and cultural settings strongly influence the development of all languages. This is a common rule, and especially relevant for sign language which is a visual language. Tibetans, as an ethnic group of China, have their own culture and lifestyle. Members of the deaf and hard-of-hearing community in TAR are influenced by native cultures, beliefs and traditions, developing individual vocabulary and grammar. Based on this principal, members of the Tibetan deaf and hard-of-hearing community developed a sign language on the region’s cultural and linguistic characteristics that differ from the standard Chinese Sign Language.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Cards (709)
    Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations A Che in China A'ou in China Population: 43,000 Population: 2,800 World Popl: 43,000 World Popl: 2,800 Total Countries: 1 Total Countries: 1 People Cluster: Tibeto-Burman, other People Cluster: Tai Main Language: Ache Main Language: Chinese, Mandarin Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Unreached Status: Unreached Evangelicals: 0.00% Evangelicals: 0.00% Chr Adherents: 0.00% Chr Adherents: 0.00% Scripture: Translation Needed Scripture: Complete Bible www.joshuaproject.net Source: Operation China, Asia Harvest www.joshuaproject.net Source: Operation China, Asia Harvest "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations A-Hmao in China Achang in China Population: 458,000 Population: 35,000 World Popl: 458,000 World Popl: 74,000 Total Countries: 1 Total Countries: 2 People Cluster: Miao / Hmong People Cluster: Tibeto-Burman, other Main Language: Miao, Large Flowery Main Language: Achang Main Religion: Christianity Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Significantly reached Status: Partially reached Evangelicals: 75.0% Evangelicals: 7.0% Chr Adherents: 80.0% Chr Adherents: 7.0% Scripture: Complete Bible Scripture: Complete Bible www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net Source: Anonymous Source: Wikipedia "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Achang, Husa in China Adi
    [Show full text]
  • What Sign Language Creation Teaches Us About Language Diane Brentari1∗ and Marie Coppola2,3
    Focus Article What sign language creation teaches us about language Diane Brentari1∗ and Marie Coppola2,3 How do languages emerge? What are the necessary ingredients and circumstances that permit new languages to form? Various researchers within the disciplines of primatology, anthropology, psychology, and linguistics have offered different answers to this question depending on their perspective. Language acquisition, language evolution, primate communication, and the study of spoken varieties of pidgin and creoles address these issues, but in this article we describe a relatively new and important area that contributes to our understanding of language creation and emergence. Three types of communication systems that use the hands and body to communicate will be the focus of this article: gesture, homesign systems, and sign languages. The focus of this article is to explain why mapping the path from gesture to homesign to sign language has become an important research topic for understanding language emergence, not only for the field of sign languages, but also for language in general. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. How to cite this article: WIREs Cogn Sci 2012. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1212 INTRODUCTION linguistic community, a language model, and a 21st century mind/brain that well-equip the child for this esearchers in a variety of disciplines offer task. When the very first languages were created different, mostly partial, answers to the question, R the social and physiological conditions were very ‘What are the stages of language creation?’ Language different. Spoken language pidgin varieties can also creation can refer to any number of phylogenic and shed some light on the question of language creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Languages Are Written Languages
    SignWriting: Sign Languages Are Written Languages By Valerie Sutton & Adam Frost Center for Sutton Movement Writing (CSMW) [email protected] • [email protected] Abstract SignWriting is one of the world’s scripts, ISO Center for Sutton Movement Writing 15924 Sgnw, recognized by the ISO on October http://www.MovementWriting.org 10, 2006: Lucinda O’Grady Batch, a Deaf native American ISO Codes for Recognized Scripts Sign Language user, together with Valerie http://unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html Sutton, founded the Deaf Action Committee for SignWriting in 1988, to encourage input from The SignWriting Spatial Alphabet is a daily Deaf people who are writing their native sign writing system for any sign language in the languages for the first time in history. world. It is used by thousands of people SignWriting is a successful writing system worldwide, in some 40 countries. It can be because of the influence and use by skilled written by hand as a daily script, or typed by signers. It is evolving naturally as more and computer, making it possible to publish books more people write, and as Deaf children learn it and web sites in written sign languages. in schools. 1. Introduction 2. Purpose & Background Sign Languages are becoming written languages SignWriting is an alphabet for writing body because of SignWriting. movement, and was not developed for linguistic research, although linguistic research labs do use Software can be accessed freely. Thousands of SignWriting to study how signers write their people create their own SignWriting dictionaries language. and long documents written in the handshapes, movements and facial expressions of their native History of SignWriting sign languages, directly on the web: www.signwriting.org/library/history/index.html SignPuddle Software Online SignWriting was not developed with a prior http://www.SignBank.org/signpuddle knowledge of any one sign language, but was instead developed as a writing tool for writing The SignWriting Central Web Site provides how the body looks while signing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Human-Editable Sign Language Representation for Software Editing—And a Writing System?
    A human-editable Sign Language representation for software editing—and a writing system? Michael Filhol [email protected] LIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay Orsay, France Abstract To equip SL with software properly, we need an input system to rep- resent and manipulate signed contents in the same way that every day software allows to process written text. Refuting the claim that video is good enough a medium to serve the purpose, we propose to build a repres- entation that is: editable, queryable, synthesisable and user-friendly—we define those terms upfront. The issue being functionally and conceptually linked to that of writing, we study existing writing systems, namely those in use for vocal languages, those designed and proposed for SLs, and more spontaneous ways in which SL users put their language in writing. Ob- serving each paradigm in turn, we move on to propose a new approach to satisfy our goals of integration in software. We finally open the prospect of our proposition being used outside of this restricted scope, as a writing system in itself, and compare its properties to the other writing systems presented. 1 Motivation and goals The main motivation here is to equip Sign Language (SL) with software and foster implementation as available tools for SL are paradoxically limited in such digital times. For example, translation assisting software would help respond arXiv:1811.01786v1 [cs.CL] 5 Nov 2018 to the high demand for accessible content and information. But equivalent text-to-text software relies on source and target written forms to work, whereas similar SL support seems impossible without major revision of the typical user interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the Smile: Language Ideologies In, and Through, Sign Language Scripts ⇑ Erika Hoffmann-Dilloway
    Language & Communication 31 (2011) 345–355 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Language & Communication journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/langcom Writing the smile: Language ideologies in, and through, sign language scripts ⇑ Erika Hoffmann-Dilloway Oberlin College, Department of Anthropology, 305 King, 10 North Professor Street, Oberlin, OH 44074, United States article info abstract Article history: This article explores the relationship between language ideology and script by detailing an Available online 25 June 2011 emerging set of practices for writing sign languages. Though sign languages have often been considered un-writable, signers worldwide are increasingly producing written sign Keywords: language texts using Sutton SignWriting (SW), a writing system originally developed for Signed languages dance notation. After comparing SW to Stokoe Notation, a sign language script developed Writing systems by a prominent sign language linguist, this article draws on texts produced by SW users, Language ideologies and the metalinguistic discussion of these texts on an email listserve, to demonstrate that use of SW allows its users to articulate and challenge dominant, and often tacit, ideologies about the nature of language and writing. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction ‘‘If you’re reading a book on history, do you really need to see the smile when the author mentions America?’’ The above question may seem confusing, as readers might wonder how a smile, a visual phenomenon not usually treated as a part of language, can be ‘‘seen’’ in writing. While this question may seem to be precluded by the nature of writing sys- tems designed to represent sound, this is a relevant concern for those writing sign languages using Sutton SignWriting (SW), a visually iconic writing system that represents movements of the body and face.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Information Access Through Data-Driven Design
    ©Copyright 2018 Danielle Bragg Expanding Information Access through Data-Driven Design Danielle Bragg A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2018 Reading Committee: Richard Ladner, Chair Alan Borning Katharina Reinecke Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Abstract Expanding Information Access through Data-Driven Design Danielle Bragg Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Richard Ladner Computer Science & Engineering Computer scientists have made progress on many problems in information access: curating large datasets, developing machine learning and computer vision, building extensive networks, and designing powerful interfaces and graphics. However, we sometimes fail to fully leverage these modern techniques, especially when building systems inclusive of people with disabilities (who total a billion worldwide [168], and nearly one in five in the U.S. [26]). For example, visual graphics and small text may exclude people with visual impairments, and text-based resources like search engines and text editors may not fully support people using unwritten sign languages. In this dissertation, I argue that if we are willing to break with traditional modes of information access, we can leverage modern computing and design techniques from computer graphics, crowdsourcing, topic modeling, and participatory design to greatly improve and enrich access. This dissertation demonstrates this potential
    [Show full text]
  • Negation in Kata Kolok Grammaticalization Throughout Three Generations of Signers
    UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Graduate School for Humanities Negation in Kata Kolok Grammaticalization throughout three generations of signers Master’s Thesis Hannah Lutzenberger Student number: 10852875 Supervised by: Dr. Roland Pfau Dr. Vadim Kimmelman Dr. Connie de Vos Amsterdam 2017 Abstract (250 words) Although all natural languages have ways of expressing negation, the linguistic realization is subject to typological variation (Dahl 2010; Payne 1985). Signed languages combine manual signs and non-manual elements. This leads to an intriguing dichotomy: While non-manual marker(s) alone are sufficient for negating a proposition in some signed languages (non- manual dominant system), the use of a negative manual sign is required in others (manual dominant system) (Zeshan 2004, 2006). Kata Kolok (KK), a young signing variety used in a Balinese village with a high incidence of congenital deafness (de Vos 2012; Winata et al. 1995), had previously been classified as an extreme example of the latter type: the manual sign NEG functions as the main negator and a negative headshake remains largely unused (Marsaja 2008). Adopting a corpus-based approach, the present study reevaluates this claim. The analysis of intergenerational data of six deaf native KK signers from the KK Corpus (de Vos 2016) reveals that the classification of KK negation is not as straightforward as formerly suggested. Although KK signers make extensive use of NEG, a negative headshake is widespread as well. Furthermore, signers from different generations show disparate tendencies in the use of specific markers. Specifically, the involvement of the manual negator slightly increases over time, and the headshake begins to spread within the youngest generation of signers.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf and Non-Deaf Research Collaboration on Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) Interpreter Training in Switzerland
    Deaf and non-deaf research collaboration on Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) interpreter training in Switzerland The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research trans-int.org Patty Shores HfH University of Applied Sciences of Special Needs Education, Sign-Language Interpreting, Zurich [email protected] Christiane Hohenstein ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Applied Linguistics [email protected] Joerg Keller ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Applied Linguistics [email protected] DOI: ti.106201.2014.a03 Abstract. Teaching, training, and assessment for sign language interpreters in Swiss German sign language (DSGS) developments since 1985 have resulted in the current Bachelor level at the Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Special Needs Education (HfH). More recently, co-teaching with Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Applied Linguistics (ZHAW) non-deaf linguists in linguistics and intercultural competence training has led to Deaf and non-deaf research collaboration. At present, there are considerable skills gaps in student proficiency in DSGS- interpreting. Standards that evaluate student second language competencies in DSGS do not yet exist for those who graduate from training programs. Despite DSGS being taught by Deaf sign language instructors, socio-linguistic and pragmatic standards reflecting the practices of the Deaf community are lacking in hearing second language learners. This situation calls for community based research on the linguistic practices embedded in the DSGS community and its domains. The ongoing need for research is to adapt unified standards according to the Common European Reference Frame (CEFR) and the European Language Portfolio (ELP) describing learners’ abilities and competencies, rather than deficiencies.
    [Show full text]