DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Operational and Commercial and Other Non-Operational Issues Involving the Use of the Emblems (Item 7.3 of the Draft Provisional Annotated Agenda)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Operational and Commercial and Other Non-Operational Issues Involving the Use of the Emblems (Item 7.3 of the Draft Provisional Annotated Agenda) EN CD/09/7.3.1 Original: English For information COUNCIL OF DELEGATES OF THE INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT MOVEMENT Nairobi, Kenya 23-25 November 2009 Study on Operational and Commercial and other Non-operational Issues Involving the Use of the Emblems (Item 7.3 of the Draft Provisional Annotated Agenda) Study Document prepared by The International Committee of the Red Cross in consultation with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and National Societies Geneva, October 2009 CD/09/7.3.1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Forword ................................................................................................................................. 5 List of abbreviations............................................................................................................... 6 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 8 Objectives and methodology.................................................................................................. 8 General principles and concepts.......................................................................................... 13 Part I. Recommendations on Operational Issues Involving the Use of the Emblem..... 20 Chapter A. Use by State Authorities ............................................................................ 20 1) May the medical services of States’ armed forces party to an armed conflict temporarily change their emblem?.................................................................................................... 20 2) May the medical services of States' armed forces use the red cross/red crescent "double emblem"?....................................................................................................................... 24 3) May two different recognized emblems be displayed on sites and means of transport shared by the medical services of the armed forces of States acting in coalition?.......... 27 4) Combat lifesavers (CLS): Are they entitled to use the emblem?..................................... 29 5) May armed forces medical personnel, units and transports entitled to use the emblem carry weapons?.............................................................................................................. 33 6) Who has the competence to authorize use of the emblem for protective purposes? What role could National Societies have in this regard? .......................................................... 39 7) How must the emblem be used in occupied territory: ..................................................... 43 a) By the medical services of the Occupying State's armed forces?............................... 43 b) By the civilian hospitals (and their staff), civilian medical units, personnel and means of transport of the Occupied State?.................................................................................... 43 8) Are civilian hospitals and medical units allowed to display the emblem in peacetime?....... ................................................................................................................................. 47 9) May the emblem be affixed to relief goods provided by a State?.................................... 53 10) May a State include a recognized distinctive emblem on a white background on its national flag? ................................................................................................................. 55 Chapter B. Use by National Societies .......................................................................... 58 11) May a National Society temporarily change the emblem (protective or indicative uses)?58 CD/09/7.3.1 2 12) May a National Society use the "double emblem" (e.g. the red cross and red crescent side by side) for indicative or protective purposes? ........................................................ 61 13) May two different recognized emblems be displayed on the same sites and means of transport that are shared by National Societies?............................................................ 64 14) Under what conditions may National Societies use the emblem as a protective device? 66 15) May a National Society use the emblem as a protective device during armed conflict without the express authorization of the authorities?...................................................... 73 16) For what activities may National Society’s personnel use the emblem as a protective device, i.e., within the framework of their role as auxiliary to the medical services of the armed forces?................................................................................................................ 76 17) May a National Society’s medical personnel use the National Society's logo when acting as auxiliary to the medical services of the armed forces, i.e., when they are entitled to use the emblem as a protective device?............................................................................... 78 18) May a National Society use a large-sized indicative emblem (the National Society's logo)?............................................................................................................................. 80 19) May a National Society authorize its personnel to use the National Society’s logo when participating in its government's humanitarian response abroad, outside the scope of Article 26 of the First Geneva Convention of 1949? ....................................................... 84 20) How may a National Society use the emblem/the National Society's logo when it is in partnership with a UN agency or some other external partner?...................................... 87 21) What is the role of the host National Society with regard to use of the emblem/National Society’s logo of a participating National Society providing assistance on its territory? .. 92 22) May the National Society's logo (or the emblem) be affixed to relief goods provided by a National Society?........................................................................................................... 97 23) In what circumstances may a National Society use the national flag simultaneously with the emblem? ................................................................................................................ 100 Chapter C. Use by the ICRC........................................................................................ 104 24) Under what circumstances may the ICRC decide not to display the red cross emblem? In such circumstances, under what conditions may the ICRC: ......................................... 104 a) decide not to use any emblem at all?....................................................................... 104 b) decide to use the red crystal emblem?..................................................................... 104 c) decide to use the red crescent emblem?.................................................................. 104 25) What is the distinction between the red cross emblem and the ICRC logo? How does the ICRC use them? .......................................................................................................... 108 26) How may the ICRC use the emblem when it resorts to armed protection?................... 111 CD/09/7.3.1 3 Chapter D. Use by Other Actors ................................................................................. 113 27) May international organizations (e.g. UN, African Union, European Union, NATO) use the emblem?...................................................................................................................... 113 28) May the medical services of armed groups use the emblem during non-international armed conflicts?........................................................................................................... 117 29) Are entities other than medical services of States’ armed forces or components of the Movement, particularly non-governmental organizations (NGOs), ever allowed to display the emblem as a protective device?............................................................................. 119 30) May private military and security companies (PMCs/PSCs) use the emblem?............. 126 31) Use of the emblem o third parties' ambulances and first-aid stations, under Article 44, 4th para., of the First Geneva Convention of 1949: What is the role of National Societies?.......................................................................................................................131 Part II. RECOMMENDATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND OTHER NON-OPERATIONAL ISSUES INVOLVING THE USE OF THE EMBLEM........................................................... 135 Chapter A. Use by State Authorities .......................................................................... 135 32) The United Nations Convention of 8 November 1968 on road signs and signals and the European Agreement of 1 May 1971 supplementing the Convention on road signs and signals: Are they compatible with the rules governing use of the emblem? .................. 135 Chapter B. Use by National Societies ........................................................................ 141 33) May a National Society display the emblem/its logo on items that it distributes or sells to the public? ................................................................................................................... 141 34) May a National Society allow its partner companies to display the emblem/the National Society’s logo on items
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whiteflag Protocol Specification
    Whiteflag Protocol Specification Status version 1 status DRAFT 6 date 28 FEB 2019 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Current armed conflicts are highly complex, because of the sheer number of parties involved: regular military forces, armed groups, peacekeeping forces, neutral parties such as journalists and non-governmental human-rights and aid organisations, civilians, refugees etc. Even though parties are opposing forces, or neutral organisations that do not want to show any affiliation, they do require to quickly and directly communicate to one or more other parties involved in the conflict in different situations. This is not new. The white flag is the original internationally recognized protective sign of truce or ceasefire, and request for negotiation. A white flag signifies to all that an approaching negotiator is unarmed, with an intent to surrender or a desire to communicate. This standard for a digital white flag protocol, the Whiteflag Protocol, provides a reliable means for both combatant and neutral parties in conflict zones to digitally communicate pre-defined signs and signals using blockchain technology. These sign and signals can also be used to communicate information about natural and man-made disasters, thus creating shared situational awareness beyond conflicts. All in all, the protocol forms the basis for a neutral and open network, the Whiteflag Network, for trusted real-time messaging between parties in conflicts and disaster response. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of the Whiteflag Protocol is to provide an open, real-time, trusted communication channel between any or all parties in conflict and disaster zones, without the requirement for a trusted third party or any specific software or system.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic and Indian
    ISLAMIC AND INDIAN ART including The Tipu Sultan Collection Tuesday 21 April 2015 Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams 1793 Ltd Directors Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No. 4326560 Robert Brooks Co-Chairman, Colin Sheaf Chairman, Jonathan Baddeley, Andrew McKenzie, Simon Mitchell, Jeff Muse, Registered Office: Montpelier Galleries Malcolm Barber Co-Chairman, Antony Bennett, Matthew Bradbury, Mike Neill, Charlie O’Brien, Giles Peppiatt, Montpelier Street, London SW7 1HH Colin Sheaf Deputy Chairman, Lucinda Bredin, Harvey Cammell, Simon Cottle, Peter Rees, Iain Rushbrook, John Sandon, Matthew Girling Global CEO, Andrew Currie, Paul Davidson, Jean Ghika, Tim Schofield, Veronique Scorer, +44 (0) 20 7393 3900 Patrick Meade Global CEO, Charles Graham-Campbell, Miranda Grant, James Stratton, Roger Tappin, Ralph Taylor, +44 (0) 20 7393 3905 fax Geoffrey Davies, Jonathan Horwich, Richard Harvey, Robin Hereford, Asaph Hyman, Shahin Virani, David Williams, James Knight, Caroline Oliphant, Charles Lanning, Sophie Law, Fergus Lyons, Michael Wynell-Mayow, Suzannah Yip. Hugh Watchorn. Gordon McFarlan, ISLAMIC AND INDIAN ART Tuesday 21 April 2015, at 10.30 101 New Bond Street, London VIEWING BIDS ENQUIRIES CUSTOMER SERVICES Sunday 12 April +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 Claire Penhallurick Monday to Friday 8:30 to 18:00 11.00 - 15.00 +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax +44 20 7468 8249 +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 Monday 13 - Friday 17 April To bid via the internet please [email protected] 9.00 - 16.30 visit bonhams.com As a courtesy to intending Saturday 18 April bidders, Bonhams will provide a 11.00 - 15.00 Please note that bids should be Matthew Thomas written Indication of the physical Sunday 19 April submitted no later than 16:00 +44 20 7468 8270 condition of lots in this sale if a 11.00 - 15.00 on the day prior to the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
    Volume 91 Number 876 December 2009 The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent: challenges, key issues and achievements Franc¸ois Bugnion* Franc¸ois Bugnion, Doctor of Political Science, is an independent consultant in humanitarian law and humanitarian action. From January 2000 to June 2006 he was Director for International Law and Cooperation at the International Committee of the Red Cross. Abstract Since the constituent Conference in October 1863, which gave birth to the Red Cross,1 the International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent has met on thirty occasions. The first meeting took place in Paris in 1867 and the thirtieth in Geneva in November 2007. What contribution has the Conference made to the development of international humanitarian law and humanitarian action? What are the main challenges that the Conference has had to face? Where has it succeeded and where has it failed? These are the questions that this article seeks to answer. * This article is a personal contribution and does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Committee of the Red Cross. English translation by Mrs Glynis Thompson. doi:10.1017/S1816383110000147 675 F. Bugnion – The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent: challenges, key issues and achievements The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent: an unparalleled forum The composition of the Conference The matters submitted to the International Conference, the nature of its debates, and the bearing of its decisions are determined by its composition. Virtually unique among international bodies, the International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent brings together institutions born out of private initiative – the components of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement – and the States parties to the Geneva Conventions.2 This hybrid composition, which brings together institutions established as a result of private initiative and states, derives from the organization’s objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Folkrätt I Väpnad Konflikt Om Orsaker
    6 Fredsinsatser Med anledning av det svenska engagemanget i fredsinsatser1 och Försvarsmaktens ökade fokus på deltagande i sådana insatser har folkrättsliga frågor kring denna verksamhet blivit allt mer viktiga för Sverige. Dagens fredsinsatser baseras oftast på ett mandat antaget under FN-stadgans kapitel VII, vilket bl.a. innebär att de ges en rätt att använda våld som inte är begränsat till självförsvar utan också innefattar sådant våld som behövs för att lösa de i mandatet definierade uppgifterna. Trots detta deltar styrkorna sällan i fientligheter på en sådan nivå att den humanitära rätten kan anses formellt tillämplig. Som beskrivits i kapitel 2.1.3 är det förekomsten av en väpnad konflikt som aktualiserar den formella tillämpningen av krigets lagar. (Se kapitel 2 för närmare resone- mang kring definitionen av en väpnad konflikt.) Enligt våra direktiv ska vi vid den kartläggning av de folk- rättsliga regler som gäller för väpnade konflikter, ockupation och neutralitet bl.a. belysa den internationella humanitära rättens tillämplighet i fredsfrämjande insatser. I detta kapitel tar vi upp vissa principiella frågeställningar som fredsinsatser väcker i för- hållande till den humanitära rätten och delar av de mänskliga rättigheterna. Vi har emellertid blivit informerade om att avsikten är att frågan om rättsliga grunder för vålds- och tvångsanvändning av svensk militär personal och poliser i fredsinsatser ska behandlas av en särskild utredning, varför vi i vår framställning inte går in i detaljresonemang kring dessa frågor. 1 Med fredsinsatser menar vi främst militära insatser som baseras på ett mandat från FN:s säkerhetsråd oavsett vilken aktör (FN, EU eller NATO) som leder insatsen.
    [Show full text]
  • 80TH REGULAR SESSION March 5–10, 2012 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
    80TH REGULAR SESSION OEA/Ser.Q March 5–10, 2012 CJI/doc.403//12 rev. 1 Mexico, D.F., Mexico 12 July 2012 Original: Spanish MODEL LEGISLATION ON PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT (presented by Dr. Ana Elizabeth Villalta Vizcarra) I. MANDATE Taking into account resolution AG/RES. 2650 (XLI-O/11), adopted at the fourth plenary session, held in San Salvador, El Salvador, on June 7, 2011, of the forty-first regular session of the General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS), which resolution is entitled “Promotion of and Respect for International Humanitarian Law,” and which refers to the rich legacy of cultural assets in the Hemisphere recognized by UNESCO as world heritage, which would benefit from the protection systems of international humanitarian law; and that, in that resolution, the OAS General Assembly resolves, in operative paragraphs 1 and 4.d: 1. To urge the member states and the parties engaged in armed conflict to honor and fulfill their obligations under international humanitarian law, including those pertaining to safeguarding the life, well-being, and dignity of protected persons and property, and the proper treatment of prisoners of war. 4. To urge the member states to adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to meet their legal obligations under the treaties on international humanitarian law to which they are party, including: d. To adopt provisions to guarantee protection of cultural property from the effects of armed conflict, which may include preventive measures related to the preparation of inventories, the planning of emergency measures, and the appointment of competent authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tanker War and the Law of Armed Conflict (Loac)
    Chapter V THE TANKER WAR AND THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT (LOAC) he 1980-88 Tanker War nearly ran the gamut of issues related to the law of T armed conflict (LOAC), or the law ofwar (LOW) and its component, the law of naval warfare (LONW). The general law of maritime neutrality, general issues of necessity and proportionality, and issues of specific concern-visit and search including operations against convoyed, escorted or accompanied neutral mer­ chant ships; commerce ofbelligerents including belligerents' convoys and contra­ band; acquisition of enemy character; blockade, maritime exclusion and other zones and other uses of the ocean for warfare; capture of neutral vessels; humani­ tarian law and belligerents' personnel interned by neutral governments; targeting of ships and aircraft including convoys; conventional weapons; mine warfare; treatment of noncombatants, e.g., merchant seamen; deception (ruses ofwar) dur­ ing armed conflict-all figured during the Tanker War. These are the subjects of this Chapter as they applied to belligerents and neutrals during the war. Chapter III analyzed UN Charter law with particular reference to the law of self-defense and its relationship to the law ofneutrality, the law oftreaties, custom­ ary law, andjus cogens-based norms, and the general principles ofneutrality as they apply to war at sea, and to conduct between neutrals and belligerents. This Chapter will not repeat that analysis, except as it interfaces with the LOAC in situations in­ volving neutrals, e.g., mine warfare, discussed in sub-Part G.2. Chapter IV analyzed the law of the sea, and those principles will not be repeated in here, except as LOS concepts, e.g., due regard for others' uses of the sea, 1 apply by analogy in the LOAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Cultural Politics Under Reza Shah
    Culture and Cultural Politics Under Reza Shah Culture and Cultural Politics Under Reza Shah presents a collection of innovative research on the interaction of culture and politics accompanying the vigorous modernization program of the first Pahlavi ruler. Examining a broad spectrum of this multifaceted interaction it makes an important contribution to the cultural history of the 1920s and 1930s in Iran, when, under the rule of Reza Shah Pahlavi, dramatic changes took place inside Iranian society. With special reference to the practical implementation of specific reform endeavors, the various contributions critically analyze different facets of the relationship between cultural politics, individual reformers, and the everyday life of modernist Iranians. Interpreting culture in its broadest sense, this book brings together con- tributions from different disciplines such as literary history, social history, ethnomusicology, art history, and Middle Eastern politics. In this way, it combines for the first time the cultural history of Iran’s modernity with the politics of the Reza Shah period. Challenging a limited understanding of authoritarian rule under Reza Shah, this book is a useful contribution to existing literature for students and scholars of Middle Eastern History, Iranian History, and Iranian Culture. Dr Bianca Devos is Assistant Professor/Lecturer at the Center for Near and Middle East Studies at the University of Marburg (Germany). Her main fields of research are Iran’s modern history, particularly the press and early modern entrepreneurship, and literary history. Professor Christoph Werner holds the Chair of Iranian Studies at the Center for Near and Middle East Studies at the University of Marburg (Germany). His main fields of interest are Qajar history, vaqf studies, and modern Persian literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Domestic Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in Ukraine
    The Domestic Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in Ukraine The Domestic Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in Ukraine May 2016 This document was prepared by Global Rights Compliance. Global Rights Compliance is registered as a limited liability partnership through Companies House in the United Kingdom, Partnership No. OC388087. Its registered address is Endeavour House, 78 Stafford Road, Wallington, Surrey, United Kingdom, SM6 9AY. This document is available in electronic format in English and Ukrainian at www.globalrightscompliance.com, as well as on Global Rights Compliance’s Facebook page. Disclaimer This publication was funded by the UK Government as part of the “International Criminal Court and International Humanitarian Law Reform” project implemented by Global Rights Compliance LLP. The views expressed in it are those of the author(s) and may not coincide with the official position of the UK Government. THE DOMESTIC IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN UKRAINE | 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 11 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 12 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 14 Objectives and Structure of the Report ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross, April 1977, Seventeenth Year
    1:' APRIL 1977 JUN 1977 SEVENTEENTH YEAR - No. 193 international review• of the red cross INTER+ ARMA CARITAS GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE REO CROSS FOUNOED IN 1863 FROPERTY OF U, So ARMY THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAl'S SCHOOL LIBRARY INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS Mr. ALEXANDRE HAY, Lawyer, former Director-General of the Swiss National Bank; President (member since 1975) Mr. JEAN PICTET, Doctor of Laws, Chairman of the Legal Commission, Director of the Henry Dunant Institute, Associate Professor at the University of Geneva, Vice-President (1967) Mr. HARALD HUBER, Doctor of Laws, Federal Court Judge, Vice-President (1969) Mrs. DENISE BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, Doctor of Laws, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights (1967) Mr. MARCEL A. NAVILLE, Master of Arts, ICRC President from 1969 to 1973 (1967) Mr. JACQUES F. DE ROUGEMONT, Doctor of Medicine (1967) Mr. ROGER GALLOPIN, Doctor of Laws, former ICRC Director-General and former President of the Executive Council (1967) Mr. WALDEMAR JUCKER, Doctor of Laws, Secretary, Union syndicale suisse (1967) Mr. VICTOR H. UMBRICHT, Doctor of Laws, Managing Director (1970) Mr. PIERRE MICHELI, Bachelor of Laws, former Ambassador (1971) Mr. GILBERT ETIENNE, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies and at the Institut d"~tudes du developpement, Geneva (1973) Mr. ULRICH MIDDENDORP, Doctor of Medicine, head of surgical department of the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur (1973) Mrs. MARION BOVEE-ROTHENBACH, Master of Social Work (University of Michigan) Reader at the Ecole des Sciences sociales et politiques of the University of Lausanne (1973) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross, June 1977, Seventeenth Year
    AUG 1 11977 JUNE 1977 SEVENTEENTH YEAR - No. 195 international review• of the red cross + INTER ARMA CARITAS GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS FOUNDED IN 1863 ~ " HOOL INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS Mr. ALEXANDRE HAY, Lawyer, former Director-General of the Swiss National Bank, President (member since 1975) Mr. JEAN PICTET, Doctor of Laws, Chairman of the Legal COn1lIlission, Director of the Henry Dunant Institute, Associate Professor at the University of Geneva, Vice-President (1967) Mr. HARALD HUBER, Doctor of Laws, Federal Court Judge, Vice-President (1969) Mrs. DENISE BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, Doctor of Laws, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights (1967) Mr. MARCEL A. NAVILLE, Master of Arts, ICRC President from 1969 to 1973 (1967) Mr. JACQUES F. DE ROUGEMONT, Doctor of Medicine (1967) Mr. ROGER GALLOPIN. Doctor of Laws, former ICRC Director-General and former President of the Executive Council (1967) Mr. VICTOR H. UMBRICHT, Doctor of Laws, Managing Director (1970) Mr. GILBERT ETIENNE, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies and at the Institut d'etudes du developpement, Geneva (1973) Mr. ULRICH MIDDENDORP, Doctor of Medicine, head of surgical department of the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur (1973) Mrs. MARION BOVEE-ROTHENBACH, Master of Social Work (University of Michigan) Reader at the Ecole des Sciences sociales et politiques of the University of Lausanne (1973) Mr. HANS PETER TSCHUDI, Doctor of Laws, former Swiss Federal Councillor (1973) Mr. HENRY HUGUENIN, Bank Manager (1974) Mr. GO'ITFRIED DE SMIT, Managing Director (1974) Mr. JAKOB BURCKHARDT, Doctor of Laws, Minister Plenipotentiary, Chairman of the Council of Federal Polytechnic Schools (1975) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Armed Conflict Manual
    Bundesministerium der Verteidigung L A C - M - Joint Service Regulation (ZDv) 15/2 Law of Armed Conflict – Manual – May 2013 DSK AV230100262 Federal Ministry of Defence Berlin, 1 May 2013 I hereby issue the Joint Service Regulation on Law of Armed Conflict – Manual – Joint Service Regulation (ZDv) 15/2 Dr. Thomas de Maizière This regulation supersedes Joint Service Regulation (ZDv) 15/2 ‘Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts – Manual’ issued August 1992, which will be destroyed. This Joint Service Regulation (ZDv) must be endorsed by 1 June 2016. Otherwise it will cease to have effect. Proponent: Directorate-General for Legal Affairs (R I 3) 1-4 ZDv 15/2 Preliminary Remarks 1. This service regulation is a manual for military and civilian personnel at all command levels and covers the law of armed conflict. It describes the law of armed conflict from the point of view of the Federal Ministry of Defence at the time this regulation is issued and is an important basis for the instruction of military personnel in international law, which is prescribed in Section 33 of the Legal Status of Military Personnel Act, in courses, exercises and general military training. Future developments of the law and of pre- deployment training for specific operations will be taken into appropriate account by supplements and special information material. 2. The text of the manual is based on important documents of international law. Citations in the text refer to the annex of source documents. Numbers in bold type indicate the reference numbers of these texts. These are followed by numbers and letters indicating individual provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Use of the Emblems Operational and Commercial and Other Non-Operational Issues
    STUDY ON THE USE OF THE STUDY ON THE USE EMBLEMS OF THE EMBLEMS OPERATIONAL AND COMMERCIAL AND OTHER NON-OPERATIONAL ISSUES 2500 10.2011 4057/002 ICRC CASESTUD_EMBLEM couv.indd 1 13.10.11 16:46 MISSION The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863, the ICRC is at the origin of the Geneva Conventions and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. It directs and coordinates the international activities conducted by the Movement in armed conflicts and other situations of violence. Front cover: Distinctive emblems of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement CASESTUD_EMBLEM couv.indd 2 13.10.11 16:46 STUDY ON THE USE OF THE EMBLEMS OPERATIONAL AND COMMERCIAL AND OTHER NON-OPERATIONAL ISSUES TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 9 List of abbreviations 11 Introduction 15 Objectives and methodology 15 General principles and concepts 21 PART I. RECOMMENDATIONS ON OPERATIONAL ISSUES INVOLVING THE USE OF THE EMBLEM 33 A. Use by State authorities 35 1. May the medical services of States’ armed forces party to an armed conflict temporarily change their emblem? 35 2. May the medical services of States’ armed forces use the red cross/red crescent “double emblem”? 40 3. May two different recognized emblems be displayed on sites and means of transport shared by the medical services of the armed forces of States acting in coalition? 44 4.
    [Show full text]