DOCSLIB.ORG

Micro-Propagation of the Gymea Lily

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Micro-propagation of the Gymea Lily A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation by Jeremy Smith March 2000 RIRDC Publication No 00/36 RIRDC Project No SMA-1A © 2000 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 58066 9 ISSN 1440-6845 Micropropagation of the Gymea Lily Publication No. 00/36 Project No. SMI-1A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Jeremy Smith The Wildflower Farm 20 Grants Road Somersby,2250 Phone: 02 4372 1393 Fax: 02 43 721774 Email: [email protected] RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in March 2000 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword Doryanthes excelsa (Doryanthaceae) is one of the most outstanding monocots found in the Australian bushland. It carries massive flower spikes that reach up to 8 metres, which are highly sought after for cutflowers and foliage in the floriculture industry. The commercial value of cutflower and foliage of Doryanthes, presently all cut from wild stands, is steadily increasing, as is the export demand for these unique flowers. The single most constraining factor on the commercial development and horticultural use of Doryanthes is the 10 years or longer lead-time from seed to first flowering. The effective horticultural development of Doryanthes therefore depends upon the derivation of a propagation method, which will enable the rapid multiplication, and early maturation of Doryanthes. This publication outlines some preliminary results achieved for the foundation of a micropropagation protocol that may potentially lead to early flowering. This aspect of early maturation has significant consequences as it will allow for the development of a sound production base and obviate the need to continue harvesting this unique Australian plant from the wild. This will have a major impact on native populations, as this is an example of a species which is well recognized, yet limited in its distribution. This publication provides a background to the micropropagation of a recalcitrant plant species. Information relating to in vitro systems to overcome contaminants, browning of plant tissue and media testing are outlined in detail. Further experimentation relating to ideal concentrations and types of plant growth regulators needs to be addressed before a strict protocol can be recommended for the micropropagation of this plant. It is expected that this project will continue so that a sound protocol can be devised to provide opportunities for commercial row production to proceed. The outcomes of this experimentation are expected to expand the native cutflower industry while conserving a unique Australian monocot. This project was funded from RIRDC Core Funds which are provided by the Federal Government. This report, a new addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 450 research publications, forms part of our Wildflowers and Native Plants R&D program, which aims to improve the profitability, productivity and sustainability of the Australian wildflower and native plant industry. Most of our publications are available for viewing, downloading or purchasing online through our website: • downloads at www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Index.htm • purchases at www.rirdc.gov.au/pub/cat/contents.html Peter Core Managing Director Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation iii Anthony, Stephen Easton and Julia Wilson who Acknowledgements offered technical advise and assistance. Thanks I would like to offer my sincere thanks and also to my family for their support and gratitude to the following people whose support, encouragement especially to my father Alan and time and assistance were invaluable to the my brother Martin of The Wildflower Farm completion of this project: Somersby, for their understanding and endless patience, without which this project would not have Dr Kingsley Dixon, Director of Plant Science at been possible. Kings Park & Botanic Garden for allowing me the opportunity to undertake my project within the Finally I would like to thank RIRDC and the Plant Science division. Many thanks for the University of Technology (Department of suggestions, technical input and continued support. Environmental Science) for funding this work Also to Mr. Eric Bunn and Dr Tissa Senaratna during 1999. (Kings Park & Botanic Garden Research Laboratory) for providing guidance, helpful discussions, advice, encouragement and friendship About the Author throughout the year. Jeremy Smith worked on this project as part of his Honours degree undertaken at the University of Dr Krystyna Johnson (University of Technology Technology, Sydney. He has completed a science Sydney) who, as my university supervisor, offered degree in Environmental and Urban Horticulture assistance and practical advice in all matters and has over 15 years of industry experience in the relating to this project as well as considerable nursery and cutflower industry. Jeremy speaks encouragement. frequently at industry meetings and is a recognized authority on Doryanthes excelsa and the cultivation Thank you to the staff and students at Kings Park & of eastern Australian wildflowers for use as Botanic Garden Research Laboratory who provided cutflowers. For over 15 years Jeremy and his a friendly working environment and help brother Martin have been managing The throughout the year. Special thanks to my Wildflower Farm in Somersby where they grow colleagues in the tissue culture and and promote fresh Australian wildflowers for cryopreservation division:- Dave Merritt, Shane domestic and export markets. Turner, Maggie Panaia, Anthony Bishop, Janet Abbreviations NaOCl sodium hypochlorite tween-80 surfactant or detergent SDW sterile distilled water BA or BAP N6-benzylaminopurine 2iP N6-isopentenyladenine KIN or Kinetin 6-furfurylaminopurine Z zeatin IBA indole-3-butyric acid NAA a-naphthaleneacetic acid NOA 2-naphthoxyacetic acid IAA indoleacetic acid 2,4-D 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid TDZ thidiazuron (N-phenyl-N-1,2,3,-thidiazol-5-ylurea) standard culture conditions light intensity of 30-40µMolm-2s-1 at culture level, 16/8 hr light/dark at mean temperature 23 ± 2oC PPFD photosynthetic photon flux density MES buffer n- morpholinoethanesulfonic acid MS Murashige and Skoog (1962) basal salts B5 Gamborg et al. (1968) basal media EtOH ethanol NaOH sodium hydroxide HCL hydrochloric acid µM micromole min minute AC activated charcoal K-C:C potassium citrate and citrate NSW New South Wales WA Western Australia iv Contents Foreword ...............................................................................................................................iii About the Author....................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations.........................................................................................................................iv Executive Summary...............................................................................................................ix 1. Micropropagation of Monocotyledons with Special Reference to Australian Plants ............ 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Species Description (Doryanthaceae) .......................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Aims and Rationale of this Study ........................................................................... 4 1.3 Plant Propagation......................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Plant Tissue Culture............................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 In Vitro Propagation of Monocotyledons................................................................. 5 1.4 Explant Sources ........................................................................................................... 5 1.4.1 Shoot Tip Culture................................................................................................... 5 1.4.2 Node and Axillary Bud Culture ............................................................................... 5 1.4.3 Inflorescences as Explant Sources ........................................................................ 6 1.5 Initiation of Tissue Cultures .......................................................................................... 6 1.5.1 Sterilization ............................................................................................................ 6 1.5.2 Multiplication .......................................................................................................... 7 1.5.3 Media Composition ...............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Honeybees, Flowers And

    Honeybees, Flowers And

    A Prelude to Spring the AlTIerican Horticultural Society visifs Charleston April 9-12, 1978 From the moment you are registered at the historic • A visit to Middleton Place, America's oldest land­ Mills Hyatt House you will witness a rebirth of an­ scaped gardens, with its artistry of green sculptured tebellum elegance. Your headquarters hotel is the old­ terraces, butterfly lakes and reflecting pools and quaint est in Charleston; it is also the newest. It opened its wooden bridges. (Cocktails, dinner, musical enter­ doors in 1853, when Charleston was the " Queen City tainment and tour.) OF the South" . rich, sophisticated, urbane. The • Drayton Hall, the finest untouched example of Mills Hyatt House served as a center of refinement and Georgian architecture standing in North America, lo­ gracious living. Recently this landmark was recon­ cated on the Ashley River and surrounded by more structed and preserved as a focal point in Charleston's than 100 acres. (Lunch and tour sponsored by the Na­ historic district. You will find the Mills Hyatt House tional Trust for Historic Preservation.) one of the most unusual and handsome hotels in • Charles Towne Landing, 200-acre exhibition park America. graced with ancient live oaks flanked by azaleas You are invited to join us and experience the charm draped with grey lace Spanish moss. Wander through of Charleston, a city that combines a unique gardening the English park gardens with acres and acres filled heritage, antebellum architecture, and modern with hundreds of trees and flowers arranged to facilities. provide interest and beauty. (Lunch, animal forest Charleston is in many ways unique, for she was the tour, guided tram rides.) first American city to protect and preserve the fine old buildings and gardens which have witnessed so much • Magnolia Plantation and Gardens.
  • Nzbotsoc No 107 March 2012

    Nzbotsoc No 107 March 2012

    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 107 March 2012 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8013 Subscriptions The 2012 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2012 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $12 (reduced to $9 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $7.00 each. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the June 2012 issue is 25 May 2012. Please post contributions to: Lara Shepherd Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467 Wellington Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word, as an open text document (Open Office document with suffix “.odt”) or saved as RTF or ASCII. Macintosh files can also be accepted. Graphics can be sent as TIF JPG, or BMP files; please do not embed images into documents.
  • Table of Contents Below) with Family Name Provided

    Table of Contents Below) with Family Name Provided

    1 Australian Plants Society Plant Table Profiles – Sutherland Group (updated August 2021) Below is a progressive list of all cultivated plants from members’ gardens and Joseph Banks Native Plants Reserve that have made an appearance on the Plant Table at Sutherland Group meetings. Links to websites are provided for the plants so that further research can be done. Plants are grouped in the categories of: Trees and large shrubs (woody plants generally taller than 4 m) Medium to small shrubs (woody plants from 0.1 to 4 m) Ground covers or ground-dwelling (Grasses, orchids, herbaceous and soft-wooded plants, ferns etc), as well as epiphytes (eg: Platycerium) Vines and scramblers Plants are in alphabetical order by botanic names within plants categories (see table of contents below) with family name provided. Common names are included where there is a known common name for the plant: Table of Contents Trees and Large shrubs........................................................................................................................... 2 Medium to small shrubs ...................................................................................................................... 23 Groundcovers and other ground‐dwelling plants as well as epiphytes. ............................................ 64 Vines and Scramblers ........................................................................................................................... 86 Sutherland Group http://sutherland.austplants.com.au 2 Trees and Large shrubs Acacia decurrens
  • Dyuhei Sato Division of Genetics, Bot. Inst. Faculty of Science, Tokyo

    Dyuhei Sato Division of Genetics, Bot. Inst. Faculty of Science, Tokyo

    ANALYSIS OF THE KARYOTYPES IN YUCCA, A GA VE AND THE RELATED GENERA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PHYLOGENETIC SIGNIFICANCEI~ Dyuhei SATo Divisionof Genetics, Bot. Inst. Faculty of Science, Tokyo Imperial University McKelvey and Sax (2933) have called attention to the existence of taxonomic and cytological similarities of the genera Yucca, Hesperoyucca, Gleistvucca,Hesperoaloe and Samuela of the Liliaceae with the genera Agave and Fourcroya which belong to a related family, Amaryllidaceae. Wh.itaker (1934) also has reported that Polianhes and Fourcroya have exactly the same chromosome constitution as the Yucca-Abave karyotype (5 long and 25 short chromosomes) (Figs. 1, 2). These observations when considered in respect to taxonomic resemblances, seem to indicate that the genera mentioned above are more closely related than it is shown by their classifica- tion into distinct families. Whitaker also has remarked that Dasylirion (2n=38) and ATolina(2n=36) in Yucceae and Doryanthes (2n=36) in Agavoideae are of different karyotypes from the Yucca-Agave type. In the present work an analysis of the karyotypes in Liliaceous plants has been attempted and several karyotypes have been found in Scilloideae. Eucornis and Carassia have been selected with the purpose of discovering a possible connecting link between these genera and the Yucca-Agave group. In the present paper an analysis of the karyotypes of the following species is given. LILIACEAE Scilloideae 211 Fig. Euconis undulata 60=8L+8M+44S (4b)2) 3 Euconsispallidi ora 60=8L+8M+44S (4b) 4 Eucomispunctata 60=8L±8M+44S (4b) 5 Camassiaescrema 30=6L+24S (2b) 6 Yucceae Yuccafilamentosa 30 60=1OL+50S (2b) 1, 7 Yuccarecurvifolia 30 60=1OL+50S (2b) 2, 8 Yuccaaloifolia 60=1OL+50S (2b) 9 „ var.
  • Blandfordia Grandiflora R. Br

    Blandfordia Grandiflora R. Br

    i Ecology and evolution of self-fertilization in a perennial herb, Blandfordia grandiflora R. Br. (Liliaceae) by Mike Ramsey A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New England May 1995 Declaration I certify that the substance of this thesis has not already been submitted for any degree and is not being currently submitted for any other degree. I certify that the help received in preparing this thesis, and all sources used, have been acknowledged in this thesis. Mike Ramsey May 1995 Acknowledgements National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales granted permits to conduct my field research at Gibraltar Range and Yuraygir National Parks. National Parks and Wildlife Services of New South Wales and Queensland, and the Forestry Commission of New South Wales provided permits for the geographic variation study of this project. My many thanks to Rod Holmes from the Glen Innes office of the National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales for providing accommodation at Gibraltar Range; this made the many extended field trips and hence the overall project possible. Dr Steven 0. Shattuck of the Division of Entomolgy, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra kindly examined the ants that I have referred to in Chapter 8. The technical staffs of the Depts of Botany and Zoology provided untold assistance and organised facilities whenever it was possible. From Botany, I thank Mike Henderson and particularly Warren Sheather who provided a wealth of knowled ge about plants in general. From Zoology, I thank Becky Francis, Louise Percival, Sandy Hamdorf, David Dye, Zolton Enoch, Kieth Cornish and Wayne Higgins.
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation

    GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation

    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
  • Reconstructing the Basal Angiosperm Phylogeny: Evaluating Information Content of Mitochondrial Genes

    Reconstructing the Basal Angiosperm Phylogeny: Evaluating Information Content of Mitochondrial Genes

    55 (4) • November 2006: 837–856 Qiu & al. • Basal angiosperm phylogeny Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes Yin-Long Qiu1, Libo Li, Tory A. Hendry, Ruiqi Li, David W. Taylor, Michael J. Issa, Alexander J. Ronen, Mona L. Vekaria & Adam M. White 1Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, The University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. [email protected] (author for correspondence). Three mitochondrial (atp1, matR, nad5), four chloroplast (atpB, matK, rbcL, rpoC2), and one nuclear (18S) genes from 162 seed plants, representing all major lineages of gymnosperms and angiosperms, were analyzed together in a supermatrix or in various partitions using likelihood and parsimony methods. The results show that Amborella + Nymphaeales together constitute the first diverging lineage of angiosperms, and that the topology of Amborella alone being sister to all other angiosperms likely represents a local long branch attrac- tion artifact. The monophyly of magnoliids, as well as sister relationships between Magnoliales and Laurales, and between Canellales and Piperales, are all strongly supported. The sister relationship to eudicots of Ceratophyllum is not strongly supported by this study; instead a placement of the genus with Chloranthaceae receives moderate support in the mitochondrial gene analyses. Relationships among magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots remain unresolved. Direct comparisons of analytic results from several data partitions with or without RNA editing sites show that in multigene analyses, RNA editing has no effect on well supported rela- tionships, but minor effect on weakly supported ones. Finally, comparisons of results from separate analyses of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes demonstrate that mitochondrial genes, with overall slower rates of sub- stitution than chloroplast genes, are informative phylogenetic markers, and are particularly suitable for resolv- ing deep relationships.
  • Morphological Variation Within the Genus Blandfordia (Liliaceae) in Relation to Its Environment

    Morphological Variation Within the Genus Blandfordia (Liliaceae) in Relation to Its Environment

    21 August 1992 Aust. Syst. Bot., 5, 373-85 Morphological Variation Within the Genus Blandfordia (Liliaceae) in Relation to Its Environment Carolyn L. PorterAB, David A. MorrisonA and Kristina A. JohnsonA *Department of Applied Biology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, N.S.W. 2007, Australia. BCurrent address: National Herbarium of N.S.W., Mrs Macquarie's Road, Sydney, N.S.W. 2000, Australia. Abstract The taxa in Blandfordia are often difficult to separate morphologically. A multivariate morphometric analysis of data from both herbarium and field samples suggests that the genus consists of at least four polythetically distinct taxa, corresponding to the traditional concepts of B. cunninghamii Lindley, B. grandifora R.Br., B. nobilis Smith, and B. punicea (Labill.) Sweet. The morphological boundaries between most of these species are arbitrary but are closely related to a number of environmental variables. Due to large intra-population variability, discrimination between these taxa is possible only on the basis of a combination of attributes, notably leaf width and margin sculpturing, and flower length and diameter. The morphological distinction between B. punicea and the other species is clear and seems to be maintained by its geographical isolation. The distinction between B. grandiflora and B. cunninghamii is based on vegetative rather than floral attributes and is made difficult by phenotypic response of B. cunninghamii plants to light intensity. Gene flow between these two species appears to be restricted by their separate habitats. The distinction between B. grandiflora and B. nobilis is based on floral rather than vegetative attributes and is related to latitude with the species being more distinct in the area of parapatry than in the area of allopatry.
  • Powerful Pollinators Encouraging Insect Pollinators in Farm Landscapes

    Powerful Pollinators Encouraging Insect Pollinators in Farm Landscapes

    Bilpin, Blue Mountains: NSW Powerful pollinators Encouraging insect pollinators in farm landscapes Pollinators are an essential component of agricultural production and of healthy, biodiverse landscapes. Protecting and enhancing pollinator resources on farms will help support a diverse range of pollinators. This brochure provides an introduction to encouraging insect pollinators on farms, including a guide to choosing plants that will support diverse pollinators throughout the year. The power of pollinators Pollinators – mostly insects, but also birds and mammals – assist the formation of seeds and fruit in many plant species by visiting flowers in search of food (nectar and/or pollen). Whilst foraging they transfer pollen from one flower to another, facilitating fertilization, which results in fruits and seeds. Honey bees, native bees and other native insects like hoverflies, wasps and butterflies provide essential © Amy-Marie Gilpin pollination services for native plants, Native vegetation supports pollinators by providing food and nesting sites. Nearby crops and garden flowers, fruits and vegetables. pastures will benefit from the increased abundance and diversity of pollinators in the landscape. Pollinators and food security Insect populations are in decline Backyard biodiversity Without insect pollinators, the quantity worldwide due to land clearing, Insect pollinators are a prime example and diversity of food and flowers intensive or monocultural of the importance of healthy ecosystems grown in backyard gardens would be agriculture, pesticide use, in urban gardens, parks and reserves. severely restricted. Many of the foods Insects are the ‘canaries in the coal mine’ we eat, from gardens and farms, pollution, colony disease, of our urban and rural environments. benefit from pollination.
  • Classification and Phylogenetic Systematics: a Review of Concepts with Examples from the Agave Family

    Classification and Phylogenetic Systematics: a Review of Concepts with Examples from the Agave Family

    Classification and Phylogenetic Systematics: A review of concepts with examples from the Agave Family David Bogler Missouri Botanical Garden • Taxonomy – the orderly classification of organisms and other objects • Systematics – scientific study of the diversity of organisms – Classification – arrangement into groups – Nomenclature – scientific names – Phylogenetics – evolutionary history • Cladistics – study of relationships of groups of organisms depicted by evolutionary trees, and the methods used to make those trees (parsimony, maximum likelihood, bayesian) “El Sotol” - Dasylirion Dasylirion wheeleri Dasylirion gentryi Agave havardii, Chisos Mountains Agavaceae Distribution Aristotle’s Scala Naturae Great Chain of Being 1579, Didacus Valades, Rhetorica Christiana hierarchical structure of all matter and life, believed to have been decreed by God Middle Ages Ruins of Rome Age of Herbalists Greek Authorities Aristotle Theophrastus Dioscorides Latin was the common language of scholars Plants and animals given Latinized names Stairway to Heaven From Llull (1304). Note that Homo is between the plant-animal steps and the sky-angel- god steps. Systematics - Three Kinds of Classification Systems Artificial - based on similarities that might put unrelated plants in the same category. - Linnaeus. Natural - categories reflect relationships as they really are in nature. - de Jussieu. Phylogenetic - categories based on evolutionary relationships. Current emphasis on monophyletic groups. - Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. Carolus Linnaeus 1707 - 1778 Tried to name and classify all organism Binomial nomenclature Genus species Species Plantarum - 1753 System of Classification “Sexual System” Classes - number of stamens Orders - number of pistils Linnaean Hierarchy Nested box-within-box hierarchy is consistent with descent from a common ancestor, used as evidence by Darwin Nomenclature – system of naming species and higher taxa.
  • The European Alpine Seed Conservation and Research Network

    The European Alpine Seed Conservation and Research Network

    The International Newsletter of the Millennium Seed Bank Partnership August 2016 – January 2017 kew.org/msbp/samara ISSN 1475-8245 Issue: 30 View of Val Dosdé with Myosotis alpestris The European Alpine Seed Conservation and Research Network ELINOR BREMAN AND JONAS V. MUELLER (RBG Kew, UK), CHRISTIAN BERG AND PATRICK SCHWAGER (Karl-Franzens-Universitat Graz, Austria), BRIGITTA ERSCHBAMER, KONRAD PAGITZ AND VERA MARGREITER (Institute of Botany; University of Innsbruck, Austria), NOÉMIE FORT (CBNA, France), ANDREA MONDONI, THOMAS ABELI, FRANCESCO PORRO AND GRAZIANO ROSSI (Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell’Ambiente; Universita degli studi di Pavia, Italy), CATHERINE LAMBELET-HAUETER, JACQUELINE DÉTRAZ- Photo: Dr Andrea Mondoni Andrea Dr Photo: MÉROZ AND FLORIAN MOMBRIAL (Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Switzerland). The European Alps are home to nearly 4,500 taxa of vascular plants, and have been recognised as one of 24 centres of plant diversity in Europe. While species richness decreases with increasing elevation, the proportion of endemic species increases – of the 501 endemic taxa in the European Alps, 431 occur in subalpine to nival belts. he varied geology of the pre and they are converting to shrub land and forest awareness of its increasing vulnerability. inner Alps, extreme temperature with reduced species diversity. Conversely, The Alpine Seed Conservation and Research T fluctuations at altitude, exposure to over-grazing in some areas (notably by Network currently brings together five plant high levels of UV radiation and short growing sheep) is leading to eutrophication and a science institutions across the Alps, housed season mean that the majority of alpine loss of species adapted to low nutrient at leading universities and botanic gardens: species are highly adapted to their harsh levels.
  • Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes

    Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes

    Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny.