DOCSLIB.ORG

Chowan River Basinwide Water Quality Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chowan River Basinwide Water Quality Plan CHOWAN RIVER BASINWIDE WATER QUALITY PLAN July 2002 Prepared by: NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources Division of Water Quality/Planning 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-5083, ext. 374 This document was approved and endorsed by the NC Environmental Management Commission on July 11, 2002 to be used as a guide by the NC Division of Water Quality in carrying out its Water Quality Program duties and responsibilities in the Chowan River basin. This plan is the first five-year update to the Chowan River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan approved by the NC Environmental Management Commission in September 1997. No state funds were used to print this public document. This publication was funded through the Clean Water Act’s Section 319 Program and the Nonpoint Source Program Section 6217. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ x Section A – General Basinwide Information ................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction to Basinwide Water Quality Planning................................................... 2 1.1 What is Basinwide Water Quality Planning?................................................. 2 1.2 Goals of Basinwide Water Quality Planning ................................................. 2 1.3 Major Components of the Basinwide Plan..................................................... 4 1.4 Benefits of Basinwide Water Quality Planning ............................................. 4 1.5 How to Get Involved...................................................................................... 5 1.6 Other References............................................................................................ 5 1.7 Division of Water Quality Functions and Locations...................................... 6 Chapter 2 – Basin Overview.......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 General Overview .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 Local Governments and Planning Jurisdictions in the Basin....................... 11 2.3 Surface Water Hydrology............................................................................. 11 2.4 Land Cover................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Population and Growth Trends .................................................................... 16 2.6 Natural Resources ........................................................................................ 19 2.6.1 Public Lands in the Chowan River Basin...................................... 19 2.6.2 Ecological Significance of the Chowan River Basin..................... 19 2.6.3 Significant Natural Heritage Areas................................................ 21 2.6.4 Rare and Threatened Aquatic Species in the Chowan River Basin .............................................................................................. 22 2.6.5 Fisheries Resources ....................................................................... 24 2.7 Permitted Wastewater and Stormwater Discharge Facilities ....................... 25 2.7.1 Wastewater Discharges in the Chowan River Basin ..................... 25 2.7.2 Stormwater Discharges in the Chowan River Basin...................... 26 2.8 Animal Operations ....................................................................................... 28 2.9 Water Use..................................................................................................... 32 2.9.1 Local Water Supply Planning........................................................ 32 2.9.2 Water Withdrawals and Interbasin Transfers ................................ 32 Chapter 3 – Summary of Water Quality Information for the Chowan River Basin .................... 35 Table of Contents i 3.1 General Sources of Pollution ....................................................................... 35 3.2 Description of Surface Water Classifications and Standards....................... 36 3.2.1 Program Overview......................................................................... 36 3.2.2 Surface Water Classifications........................................................ 36 3.2.3 Classifications and Standards in the Chowan River Basin............ 37 3.3 DWQ Water Quality Monitoring Programs in the Chowan River Basin..... 39 3.3.1 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring ......................................... 39 3.3.2 Fish Assessments........................................................................... 42 3.3.3 Aquatic Toxicity Monitoring......................................................... 43 3.3.4 Ambient Monitoring System Program........................................... 44 3.4 Other Water Quality Research ..................................................................... 45 3.4.1 Division of Environmental Health Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality Section .............................................. 46 3.4.2 Virginia’s Water Quality Monitoring ............................................ 46 3.5 Use Support Summary ................................................................................. 47 3.5.1 Introduction to Use Support........................................................... 47 3.5.2 Comparison of Use Support Ratings to Streams on the Section 303(d) List ..................................................................................... 48 3.5.3 Use Support Ratings for the Chowan River Basin ........................ 48 Chapter 4 – Water Quality Issues Related to the Entire Chowan River Basin............................ 54 4.1 Overview...................................................................................................... 54 4.2 Biological Monitoring Issues ....................................................................... 54 4.2.1 Draft Criteria for Assessing Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Swamp Streams ............................................................................. 54 4.2.2 Draft Criteria for Assessing Fish Communities............................. 55 4.3 Fish Consumption Advisories...................................................................... 55 4.3.1 Mercury Related Fish Consumption Advisories............................ 55 4.3.2 Dioxin Related Fish Consumption Advisories .............................. 56 4.3.3 2002 Recommendations................................................................. 57 4.4 Growth and Development and Stormwater Management............................ 59 4.4.1 Introduction.................................................................................... 59 4.4.2 Recommendations for Addressing Growth, Development and Stormwater Impacts ....................................................................... 60 4.5 Effects of Hurricanes on Water Quality....................................................... 64 4.5.1 Contaminants ................................................................................. 64 4.5.2 De-Snagging .................................................................................. 65 4.5.3 2002 Recommendations................................................................. 65 4.6 Wetland Loss................................................................................................ 66 4.6.1 Introduction.................................................................................... 66 4.6.2 Physical Impacts to Wetlands and Streams ................................... 66 4.6.3 2002 Recommendations................................................................. 68 Table of Contents ii 4.7 Chowan River Basin Wastewater Discharger Issues ................................... 68 4.7.1 Chowan River Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Strategy........... 68 4.7.2 Discharges of Oxygen-Consuming Waste to Swamp Waters ....... 69 4.7.3 2002 Recommendations................................................................. 69 4.8 Priority Issues for the Next Five Years ........................................................ 69 4.8.1 Introduction.................................................................................... 69 4.8.2 Strategies for Restoring and Protecting Impaired Waters ............. 70 4.8.3 Addressing Waters on the State’s 303(d) List ............................... 70 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section B – Water Quality Data and Information by Subbasin................................................... 72 Chapter 1 – Chowan River Subbasin 03-01-01 Includes the Upper Chowan River, Wiccacon River and Ahoskie Creek Watershed................................................................................................................. 73 1.1 Water Quality Overview .............................................................................. 73 1.2 Status and Recommendations for Previously Impaired Waters................... 76 1.2.1 Ahoskie Creek ............................................................................... 77 1.2.2 Wiccacon River (Hoggard Swamp)............................................... 77 1.2.3 Merchants Millpond (Bennetts Creek) .......................................... 78 1.3 Status and Recommendations for Newly Impaired Waters ......................... 78 1.4 Other Water Quality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ocanahowan and Recently Discovered Linguistic
    2 OCANAHOWAN AND RECENTLY DISCOVERED LINGUISTIC FRAGMENTS FROM SOUTHERN VIRGINIA, C. 1650 Philip Barbour Ridgefield, Connecticut Published in: Papers of the 7th Algonquian Conference (1975) Ocanahowan (or Ocanahonan and other spellings) was the name of an Indian town or village, region or tribe, which was first reported in Captain John Smith's True Relation in 1608 and vanished from the records after Smith mentioned it for the last time 1624, until it turned up again in a few handwritten lines in the back of a book. Briefly, these lines cover half a page of a small quarto, and have been ascribed to the period from about 1650 to perhaps the end of the century, on the basis of style of writing. The page in question is the blank verso of the last page in a copy of Robert Johnson's Nova Britannia, published in London in 1604, now in the possession of a distinguished bibliophile of Williamsburg, Virginia. When I first heard about it, I was in London doing research and brushing up on the English language, Easter-time 1974, and Bernard Quaritch, Ltd., got in touch with me about "some rather meaningless annotations" in a small volume they had for sale. Very briefly put, for I shall return to the matter in a few minutes, I saw that the notes were of the time of the Jamestown colony and that they contained a few Powhatan words. Now that the volume has a new owner, and I have his permission to xerox and talk about it, I can explain why it aroused my interest to such an extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Hertford County
    HERTFORD COUNTY '~- ..... Worker: Gwendolyn P. Hawks Compiled by the Historical Recoi Survey of North Carolina, 1938. HERTFORD COUNTY AHOSKIE , NORTH CAROLINA TOWN OF AHOSKIE CEMETERY IDeATION:: This cemetery is located about -lt miles from the Town of Ashoskie and is located on the Ste Joun's-Union Road. The 100 other marked graves post date the year 1914. -NANE BORN -DIED REMARKS Baker, Bertha Lawrence no date 3-28-1876 Wife of Albert Baker. Curtis, L. Me 6-25-1852 7-28-1908 An Elder in the Pres­ byterian Church. Darden, Jmnes H. 12-8-1863 1-16-1910 Floydi Leah Martha 4-2-1914 6-10-1914 Rosbon, D. Bridger no date mo date A marker on his grave denotes he was confederate Soldier ~ on the grave is shown the following: co. F. ll N. c. Infe c. s. A. Worker: Evelyn Smith Compiled by Historical Records Survey of North Carolina, 1938 HEim'ORD COUNTY AHOSKIE, N, C, AHOSKIE BCIPl'IST CHURCH CEMETERY Location: This is located at the east end Ol' Main and Church St. where the Presbyter­ ian Church is now located, BORN DIED RE!&RKS Barker, s. Nettie 7-27-1873 9-5-1893 Doughtie, Annie Louisa Joyner 9-9-1876 8-26-1916 Garrett , · M. · Thomas 6-28-1877 4-22-1911 Green, J'. W. ·(Mrs.) 5-7-1856 3-B-1908 Griffin, F,. Sarah 2-8-1856 3-10-1892 Hollowman,R, Livinia 2-1854 10---1912 Overton, ·H.· Thomas 9-l-1867 2-17-1913 Sect t, G, R, (Mrs.) ----1872 -----1902 Stephen, H, Larry· 12-3-1856 4-12-1909 Waters; H, T., Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Shows Lost Colony Survivors Lived Inland
    NEWS RELEASE OCTOBER 15, 2020 Discovery shows Lost Colony survivors lived inland BERTIE COUNTY, N.C. -- Survivors of Sir Walter Raleigh’s “Lost Colony” moved inland and lived for several years along the Chowan River, according to new evidence excavated and identified by archaeologists from the First Colony Foundation, Foundation President Phillip Evans announced today. “The number and variety of artifacts recovered provide compelling evidence that the site was inhabited by several settlers from Raleigh’s vanished 1587 colony,” said First Colony Foundation principal investigator Nick principal investigator and Foundation Luccketti briefs local Bertie leaders on the excava- tion results. Research Vice President Nicholas Luccketti. On land belonging to Bertie County, the site has been designated Site Y. A nearby site previously discovered by Foundation archaeologists was designated Site X in 2015. “What has been found so far at Site Y in Bertie County appears to me to solve one of the greatest mysteries in Early American history, the odyssey of the ‘Lost’ Colony,” said Dr. William M. Kelso, CBE, FSA, Emeritus Director of Archaeology and Research at Jamestown Rediscovery. “And now, like Jamestown, knowing more about where the history of the English-American nation began is a crucial step toward a full understanding what the American nation has become.” Beginning in December 2019, Foundation crews gathered data from ground-penetrating radar and screened soil excavated from 72 5-by-5 test squares, unearthing ceramic sherds from the Roanoke Colony period. The sherds represent food and drink preparation, consumption, and storage, indicating that the Roanoke settlers were actually living at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Skeletal Material in Eroding Shorelines, Currituck
    WEAPEMEOC SHORES: THE LOSS OF TRADITIONAL MARITIME CULTURE AMONG THE WEAPEMEOC INDIANS by Whitney R. Petrey April, 2014 Director of Thesis: Larry Tise, PhD Major Department: Maritime Studies The Weapemeoc were an Indian group of the Late Woodland Period through the Early Colonial Period (1400 A.D.-1780 A.D.) that went through significant cultural change as they were displaced from their traditional maritime subsistence resources. The Weapemeoc were located in what is today northeastern North Carolina. Their permanent villages were located along the northern shore of Albemarle Sound, with seasonal and temporary villages on the outer banks and upriver on the several tributaries that drain to the Albemarle Sound. Weapemeoc access to maritime resources would be altered significantly by European colonization and settlement in the area. The loss of maritime subsistence, maritime communication and maritime mentality resulted in the loss of the traditional culture of the Weapemeoc Indians and their seeming disappearance as a distinct group of people. Early historical records and maps illustrate the acculturation of the Weapemeoc and the loss of traditional maritime culture. As land was sold to settlers in prime areas along rivers and along the shore of the Albemarle Sound, Weapemeoc were displaced from their seasonal procurement sites and seasonal permanent villages. By 1704, a reservation was established by the colonial government for the Weapemeoc along Indiantown Creek. By 1780, the Weapemeoc lived in such a similar fashion as their neighbors of European descent that they are no longer distinguishable in the archaeological or historical record. WEAPEMEOC SHORES: THE LOSS OF TRADITIONAL MARITIME CULTURE AMONG THE WEAPEMEOC INDIANS A Thesis Presented To the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts In Maritime Studies by Whitney R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scuppernong River Project: Explorations of Tyrrell County Maritime History
    THE SCUPPERNONG RIVER PROJECT: VOLUME 1 EXPLORATIONS OF TYRRELL COUNTY MARITIME HISTORY Nathan Richards, Daniel Bera, Saxon Bisbee, John Bright, Dan Brown, David Buttaro, Jeff O’Neill and William Schilling i Research Report No. 21 THE SCUPPERNONG RIVER PROJECT: VOLUME 1 EXPLORATIONS OF TYRRELL COUNTY MARITIME HISTORY By Nathan Richards Daniel Bera Saxon Bisbee John Bright Dan Brown David Buttaro Jeff O’Neill William Schilling 2012 © The PAST Foundation ISBN 978-1-939531-00-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012955595 Series Editor: Nathan Richards, Program in Maritime Studies, East Carolina University, Admiral Ernest M. Eller House, Greenville, North Carolina, 27858. Cover: Portion of the James Wimble map of North Carolina (1738) showing location of the Scuppernong River (North Carolina State Archives). Cover design concept: Nadine Kopp. ii DEDICATION This publication is dedicated to the people of Columbia, for their unwavering hospitality during the 2011 Scuppernong River Project. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project and the products that have emerged from it would not have been possible without the assistance of a congregation of people from a host of institutions across eastern North Carolina. From the outset, this project was designed with collaboration at its core. In investigating the history and archaeology of Tyrrell County, we wanted this to be a project that left something for the people of the area to have once we packed up and returned from where we came. We hope that our work lives up to their expectations. At the UNC-Coastal Studies Institute, John McCord and David Sybert were involved in every facet of the project; not only did they coordinate local outreach and education events (in conjunction with Lauren Heesemann, NOAA) and film activities for a short documentary, but they also “took the plunge” when instrumentation disappeared into the tea-stained Scuppernong.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Raleigh National Historic Site: Preservation and Recognition, C
    CONTENTS Figure Credits iv List of Figures V Foreword vii Acknowledgements ix Introduction 1 Chapter One: The Roanoke Colonies and Fort Raleigh, c. 1584-1590 9 Associated Properties 28 Registration Requirements/Integrity 29 Contributing Resources 30 Potentially Eligible Archeological Resources 30 Chapter Two: The Settlement and Development of Roanoke Island, c. 1650-1900 31 Associated Properties 54 Registration Requirements/Integrity 55 Noncontributing Resources 57 Potentially Eligible Archeological Resources 57 Chapter Three: Fort Raleigh National Historic Site: Preservation and Recognition, c. 1860-1953 59 Associated Properties 91 Registration Requirements/Integrity 93 Contributing Resources 97 Noncontributing Resources 97 Potentially Eligible Archeological Resources 97 Management Recommendations 99 Bibliography 101 Appendix A: Descriptions of Historic Resources A-l Appendix B: Property Map/Historical Base Map B-l Appendix C: National Register Documentation C-1 Index D-l iii FIGURE CREDITS Cover, 15, 17, 22: courtesy of Harpers Ferry Center, National Park Service; pp. 10, 12, 13, 16, 23: Charles W. Porter III, Adventurers to a New World; pp. 22, 27: Theodore De Bry, Thomas Hariot’s Virginia; pp. 35,39,41: courtesy of the Outer Banks History Center, Manteo, NC; pp. 37, 38: Samuel H. Putnam, The Story of Company A, Twenty-Fifth Regiment, Massachusetts Volunteers, in the War of the Rebellion; p. 43: Vincent Colyer, Report of the Services Rendered by the Freed People to the United States Army, in North Carolina; pp. 44, 46, 47: Joe A. Mobley, James City, A Black Community in North Carolina, 1863-1900; pp. 55, 67, 81: S. Bulter for the National Park Service; pp. 61, 66, 78: William S.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina River Herring Plan Introduction the North Carolina
    North Carolina River Herring Plan Introduction The North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission approved and adopted the North Carolina – Amendment 1 – River Herring Fishery Management Plan (FMP) in September 2007. The goal of the FMP is to restore and manage river herring (blueback herring and alewife) in North Carolina in a manner that is biologically, economically, and socially sound while protecting the resource, the habitat, and its users. The status of both species as indicated in the FMP is overfished and overfishing was occurring. Definition of Management Unit The management unit includes the two species of river herring (blueback herring, Alosa aestivalis, and alewife, A. pseudoharengus) and their fisheries throughout coastal North Carolina. The management areas are defined as follows: The Albemarle Sound River Herring Management Area (ASRHMA)- Albemarle Sound and all its Coastal, Joint and Inland water tributaries; Currituck Sound; Roanoke and Croatan sounds and all their Coastal, Joint and Inland water tributaries, including Oregon Inlet, north of a line from Roanoke Marshes Point 35° 48.3693’ N - 75° 43.7232’ W across to the north point of Eagles Nest Bay 35° 44.1710’ N - 75° 31.0520’ W (Figure 1). The Chowan River Herring Management Area (CRHMA)- Northwest of a line from Black Walnut Point 35° 59.9267’ N - 76° 41.0313’ W to Reedy Point 36° 02.2140’ N - 76° 39.3240’ W, to the North Carolina/Virginia state line; including the Meherrin River (Figure 1). River herring are distributed throughout the coastal waters of North Carolina, ascending many streams to their headwaters or until blocked by dams or other obstructions.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rivers to Sounds in the Bertie Water Crescent
    FROM RIVERS TO SOUNDS IN THE BERTIE WATER CRESCENT A WATER-BASED VISION FOR SUSTAINABLE ECO-TOURISM AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION BERTIE COUNTY, NC FROM RIVERS TO SOUNDS A REPORT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA LAND OF WATER (NC LOW) www.nclandofwater.org December 21, 2018 1 FROM RIVERS TO SOUNDS IN THE BERTIE WATER CRESCENT A WATER-BASED VISION FOR SUSTAINABLE ECO-TOURISM AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION BERTIE COUNTY, NC NORTH CAROLINA LAND OF WATER (NC LOW) www.nclandofwater.org NC LOW TEAM Dr. Stanley Riggs: North Carolina Land of Water (NC LOW) Mr. David Hodges: Good Consulting Service, LLC Dr. Robert Christian: North Carolina Land of Water (NC LOW) Dr. David Mallinson: ECU Department of Geological Sciences Ms. Dorothea Ames: North Carolina Land of Water (NC LOW) Ms. Karen Clough: North Carolina Land of Water (NC LOW) FUNDED BY TOWN OF WINDSOR BERTIE COUNTY KENAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY, AND SCIENCE EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY December 21, 2018 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Left panel is the Hoggard Mill Road small boat launch built by the Town of Windsor on the bank of the black-water Cashie River. Photograph is by S. Riggs. Right panel is looking north along the sandy beach of Albemarle Sound in Bertie County’s 137 acre property known as “A Tall Glass of Water”. Photograph is by S. Sauer. 2 FROM RIVERS TO SOUNDS IN THE BERTIE WATER CRESCENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………….. 5 DEVELOPING REGIONAL STORIES FOR ECO-TOURISM ………………… 8 THE BERTIE COASTAL SYSTEM AND ECO-TOURISM …………………… 9 “WATER HUBS” OF THE “BERTIE WATER CRESCENT” …………………………. 13 WATER HUB 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret History of the Meherrin
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1994 The Secret History of the Meherrin Shannon Lee Dawdy College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dawdy, Shannon Lee, "The Secret History of the Meherrin" (1994). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625864. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-gpp0-9a92 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE MEHERRIN A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Shannon Lee Dawdy 1994 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Shannon Lee Dawdy Approved, May 1994 Theodore R. Reinhart Kathleen J. Bragdon Helen C. Rountree Professor of Anthropology Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice Old Dominion University TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The North End of Roanoke Island in the 17Th Century
    th The North End of Roanoke Island in the 17 Century Roanoke Island at the beginning of the 17th century had probably changed relatively little from how John White saw it on 18 August 1590. Surely the palisado he saw had further deteriorated and the weeds had grown higher with shrubby undergrowth becoming established, but otherwise the island was once again in the quiet possession of the Indians. Under instructions from Sir Walter Raleigh, White had left the island in 1587 under at least the nominal dominion of a Croatoan Indian, Manteo, as “Lord of Roanoke and Dasamunkepeuc.”1 (Croatoan was that part of the barrier islands or outer banks off what is now North Carolina extending from the area around Cape Hatteras to about the middle of Ocracoke Island. Dasamunkepeuc was the Indian town at present day Manns Harbor, and John White crossed the island in 1590 to take a look across the sound toward it.) White encountered no one on the island in 1590, but reported seeing the fresh footprints of two or three Indians along the sound shore.2 Whether the Indians inhabited Roanoke or Dasamunkepeuc in 1600 is not known with certainty, but they appear to at least have visited the island to hunt for deer. White in 1587 stated that they hunted deer in the marshy, reedy areas of the island and that it was likely a party of these hunters who had killed colonist George Howe, one of John White’s Assistants for the Cittie of Ralegh, in 1587. White identified them as remnants of the Roanokes revenging the 1586 killing of the leader Wingina and then associates of Wanchese.
    [Show full text]
  • Secured Transactions History: the Impact of Southern Staple Agriculture on the First Chattel Mortgage Acts in the Anglo- American World
    Digital Commons at St. Mary's University Faculty Articles School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2004 Secured Transactions History: The Impact of Southern Staple Agriculture on the First Chattel Mortgage Acts in the Anglo- American World George Lee Flint Jr St. Mary's University School of Law, [email protected] Marie Juliet Alfaro Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/facarticles Part of the Secured Transactions Commons Recommended Citation George Lee Flint, Jr. and Marie Juliet Alfaro, Secured Transactions History: The Impact of Southern Staple Agriculture on the First Chattel Mortgage Acts in the Anglo-American World, 30 Ohio N. L. Rev. 2 (2004). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Secured Transactions History: The Impact of Southern Staple Agriculture on The First Chattel Mortgage Acts in The Anglo-American World GEORGE LEE FLINT, JR.* AND MARE JULIET ALFARO** PRELUDE In 1638 John Neale mortgaged his pinnace, a small ship, by deed to Nathaniel Littleton and William Burdett.' The debtor, John Neale, was a merchant who first located in 1632 at Elizabeth City, Virginia, across the Chesapeake Bay from Accomack County, Virginia, on the Eastern Shore leasing fifty acres for twenty-one years. 2 By 1636 Neale had patented 1500 acres on the seaboard side in Accomack County.3 In 1637 he had patented the 500-acre tract, "Smith's Island", with another merchant, John Redman of London, that they relinquished to stock-raisers.4 A few months later, Neale obtained 200 acres at King's Creek and in 1644 would obtain "Magotha Bay", both well located for trading.' Neale maintained a store to sell goods to * Professor of Law, St.
    [Show full text]