DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish River Station Northern Territory 23 April–3 May 2012 What Is Contents Bush Blitz?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish River Station Northern Territory 23 April–3 May 2012 What Is Contents Bush Blitz? BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Fish River Station Northern Territory 23 April–3 May 2012 What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a Summary 3 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 3 partnership between the Introduction 5 Australian Government, Reserve Overview 6 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Methods 8 Australia to document plants Results 12 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Discussion 15 National Reserve System. Appendix A: Species Lists 37 Fauna 38 Vertebrates 38 This innovative partnership Invertebrates 46 harnesses the expertise of many Flora 54 of Australia’s top scientists from Appendix B: Threatened Species 67 museums, herbaria, universities, Fauna 68 and other institutions and Flora 68 organisations across the country. Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 69 Fauna 70 Vertebrates 70 Invertebrates 71 Flora 72 Glossary 73 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary This Bush Blitz was the first substantial baseline flora and invertebrate survey of Fish River Station, and has significantly increased information for the Abbreviations reserve. In total, 701 flora and fauna species were ABRS added to those previously known for the reserve, of Australian Biological Resources Study which 60 are believed to be new to science. Of the ANIC putative new species, a spider (Phlogius n. sp. 13) Australian National Insect Collection and a vascular plant (Brachychiton n. sp. Fish River) are likely to be endemic to Fish River Station. CSIRO Another major discovery was a new species of Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research goblin spider that has since been described as Organisation Cavisternum attenboroughi n. sp. in honour of EPBC Act Sir David Attenborough. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) Fish River Station supports a diverse group of ILC terrestrial vertebrates broadly characteristic of the Indigenous Land Corporation tropical savannas of the Top End of the Northern IUCN Territory. During this study, 14 frogs, including International Union for Conservation of Nature the Cane Toad (Rhinella marina), and 35 reptile species were documented, bringing the number NRS of amphibians and reptiles known from Fish River National Reserve System Station to 81. Six of these were recorded on the TPWC Act reserve for the first time. Fish River Station has a Territory Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 2000 high diversity of freshwater fishes, with 29 species (Northern Territory) recorded during the survey, raising the total number to 45. Delicate Blue Eye (Pseudomugil tenellus) specimens collected have an unusual gold colour form and might be an undescribed species from the Daly Basin, with most of its known range on Fish River Station. A spring-fed swamp appears to be a rare core habitat for this species. The diversity and abundance of small mammals was low, which reflects the severity of ongoing small mammal declines experienced across the Top End. Unfortunately, the team did not capture The survey team for the Fish River Station Bush Blitz © Copyright, R. Whyte the undescribed species of false antechinus Back row: Ben Firth, Ian Cowie, Vince Kessner, Dane Trembath, Gavin Dally, Stephen Richards, Dave Wilson. (Pseudantechinus sp.) that was the main target of Middle row: Mim Jambrecina, Nicole Gunther, Jo Harding, Celia Symonds, Chris Cargill, Michael Hammer. mammal trapping. This suggests that population Front row: Alister Bell and Darren Stockton (helicopter pilots), Michael Braby, densities are low, requiring a longer survey period. Kate Gillespie, Donna Lewis, Robert Raven, Jeff Long. Fish River Station Northern Territory 2012 3 One of the many rivers fringed by Melaleuca and Eucalyptus woodlands, R. Raven © Copyright, Queensland Museum The semi-aquatic Mertens’ Water Monitor (Varanus A significant attribute of Fish River Station is the mertensi) was the only threatened animal observed lack of introduced fishes. Other feral animals were that is listed under the Territory Parks and Wildlife common on most parts of the reserve with 20 exotic Conservation Act 2000 (TPWC Act). No species listed or pest animal species recorded. The environmental under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity damage attributed to Water Buffalo Bubalus( bubalis), Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) were recorded; European Cattle (Bos taurus) and Pigs (Sus scrofa) however, several are known to occur on the was evident at most sites. Some reptiles known to property. experience population declines following the arrival of the Cane Toad and expected to occur on the Some 351 flora species were recorded on Fish reserve were not found during this survey. River Station for the first time. It supports extensive areas of Excoecaria parvifolia/Eucalyptus Twenty weeds were recorded including six noxious microtheca/Melaleuca/Eucalyptus camaldulensis- weeds gazetted under the Weeds Management Act dominated forest, a community not observed 2001 (NT). The most important emerging weed is elsewhere. Thirty-seven species of conservation Gamba Grass (Andropogon gayanus), which is not yet significance1 were identified, although no listed well established on Fish River Station, in contrast to threatened plants were recorded. Information nearby pastoral land. Gamba Grass is likely to have gathered during this survey may result in the a serious impact on the conservation of native flora. change of conservation status of some species at Of the non-gazetted weeds, the most significant are the next (2014–15) review of species listings under Gambia Pea (Crotalaria goreensis) and Annual Mission the TPWC Act. Grass (Cenchrus pedicellatus subsp. pedicellatus)— both are common and appear to be spreading. Gambia Pea promises to cause similar problems as the declared weeds Coffee Senna Senna( occidentalis) 1 Species of conservation significance are those in the and Arsenic Weed (S. obtusifolia) because of its similar IUCN categories Data Deficient, Not Evaluated and Near structure and ecological characteristics. Threatened. 4 Bush Blitz survey report Introduction This is a report for the Bush Blitz program, which coordination and overall leadership of the aims to survey recent additions to the National survey. Experts from the following organisations Reserve System (NRS)2. Bush Blitz is an initiative of conducted the field and laboratory work: Museum the Australian Government, through the Australian and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, Northern Biological Resources Study (ABRS), in partnership Territory Herbarium, Department of Land Resource with BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Australia. The Management Flora and Fauna Division, Australian Bush Blitz objectives are: National Insect Collection (CSIRO), Australian + to promote, publicise and demonstrate the National Herbarium (CSIRO), Queensland Museum, importance of taxonomy through species Darwin Botanic Gardens, University of New South discovery; Wales and the consultancy Aquagreen. + to undertake a national species discovery The ABRS wishes to thank the Museum and Art program targeted at recently acquired Gallery of the Northern Territory and the Northern properties of the NRS of Australia; Territory Herbarium for hosting this Bush Blitz. Jeff + to support the science of taxonomy in Long and Shaun Ansell from the Indigenous Land Australia through training students and Corporation (ILC) facilitated access to the reserve early career researchers, and the provision of and provided helpful advice on survey locations. grants for species description and resolution of taxonomically problematic, nationally important groups; + to promote partnerships between scientific institutions, government, industry and non-government organisations; and + to inform the NRS, reserve managers and other stakeholders of the results of the Bush Blitz Project. This Bush Blitz took place from 23 April 2012 to 3 May 2012, in the transition period between the wet and dry seasons. The ABRS provided logistical 2 The NRS is Australia’s network of protected areas, covering 16.52% of the country—over 12.7 million hectares, comprising Commonwealth, state and territory reserves, Indigenous lands and protected areas run by non-profit conservation organisations, through to ecosystems protected by farmers on their private working properties <http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/land/national- reserve-system>, accessed 27 May 2014. Vince Kessner, Michael Braby and Robert Raven having a moment of rest, M. Jambrecina © Copyright, Department of the Environment Fish River Station Northern Territory 2012 5 Reserve Overview3 Fish River Station Description Indigenous Land Corporation Fish River Station is a former pastoral property situated approximately 150 km south of Darwin in the Daly Basin bioregion. Date of purchase The property is largely undeveloped, with past clearing only for infrastructure (fencing, tracks, airstrip and homestead) and more 2010 recently from tracks associated with uranium exploration and a gas pipeline easement. Area The ILC purchased Fish River Station through the NRS component of the 182,500 ha Australian Government’s Caring for our Country initiative, in partnership with The Nature Conservancy and Pew Foundation. The ILC holds Fish River Station on behalf of the traditional owners (Larbarganyin, Wagiman, Malak Malak and Kamu representatives) in a trust arrangement with Greening Australia. The ILC and traditional owners, with support from The Nature Conservancy, are working to develop long-term, sustainable management plans for Fish River Station. With a tropical wet–dry climate, Fish River Station
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Fire in the Ecology of Leichhardt's Grasshopper (Petasida Ephippigera) and Its Food Plants, Pityrodia Spp
    The role of fire in the ecology of Leichhardt's grasshopper (Petasida ephippigera) and its food plants, Pityrodia spp. Piers Hugh Barrow B. Sc. (University of Queensland) Hons. (Northern Territory University) A thesis submitted to satisfy the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Institute of Advanced Studies, School for Environmental Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia. March 2009 I hereby declare that the work herein, now submitted as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy is the result of my own investigations, and all references to ideas and work of other researchers have been specifically acknowledged. I hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not being currently submitted in candidature for any other degree. Piers Barrow March 2009 i Acknowledgements My partner Cate Lynch provided support and encouragement, field assistance, proof- reading and editing, and forewent much of what is expected in normal life for a such a long time through this project, and I am deeply grateful. My supervisors Peter Whitehead, Barry Brook, Jeremy Russell-Smith and Stephen Garnett provided valuable advice and discussion, and, despite typically huge workloads, never failed to make themselves available to help. I am particularly indebted to Peter Whitehead, who shouldered most of the work, way beyond expectations, and provided guidance and insight throughout, and to Jeremy Russell-Smith, who has encouraged and facilitated my interest in the ecology of the Top End in general, and of the sandstone country and fire in particular, for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Odonata in University Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 5, ISSUE 05, MAY 2016 ISSN 2277-8616 Diversity And Distribution Of Odonata In University Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesian Ameilia Zuliyanti Siregar, Darma Bakti Abstract: A total of nine stations randomly selected study sites around the University Sumatera Utara area conducted during a month (16 January 2016 until 16 February 2016) for identified of Odonata. Odonata are insect which function as bioindicator and conservation of an environment status in the area. The sampled were collected using a sweep net (400 μm mesh, 60 cm x 90 cm) with six times the swing starts at 0900 until 1200 noon hour and identified in the laboratory. Consist of two sub-orders, 4 families, 24 genera, 32 species and 156 individuals identified dragonfly. Orthetrum sabina, Pantala flavescens and Agriocnemis femina are the kinds of dragonflies dominant, while two types of Vestalis/Arethystira amoena and Tholymis aurora is found only in the Station 3. As much as 54% relative abundance of family Coenagrionidae dominated, followed by Libellulidae (35%), Gomphidae (8%) and the smallest recorded from family Calopterygidae (35). The calculation of the value of the index is done, includes diversity Shannon, eveness and varied of Jaccard index (H'=2.48-3.79, E=0.70-0.85, CJ=0.45 to 1.00). Based on the conservation status, calculated the percentage of attendance dragonfly, divided into four groups of species that are rare (6.28%), there are species (54.24%), many species (24.78%) and very many species (14.70%). This study shows diversity and distribution of Odonata can used as potential as predators and conservation status of ecosystem University of Sumatera Utara areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Water Bugs in Gujranwala District, Punjab, Pakistan
    Journal of Bioresource Management Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 1 Diversity of Water Bugs in Gujranwala District, Punjab, Pakistan Muhammad Shahbaz Chattha Women University Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Bagh (AJK), [email protected] Abu Ul Hassan Faiz Women University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Bagh (AJK), [email protected] Arshad Javid University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore, [email protected] Irfan Baboo Cholistan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, [email protected] Inayat Ullah Malik The University of Lakki Marwat, Lakki Marwat, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/jbm Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Entomology Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Chattha, M. S., Faiz, A. H., Javid, A., Baboo, I., & Malik, I. U. (2018). Diversity of Water Bugs in Gujranwala District, Punjab, Pakistan, Journal of Bioresource Management, 5 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35691/JBM.8102.0081 ISSN: 2309-3854 online (Received: May 16, 2019; Accepted: Sep 19, 2019; Published: Jan 1, 2018) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Bioresource Management by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Diversity of Water Bugs in Gujranwala District, Punjab, Pakistan © Copyrights of all the papers published in Journal of Bioresource Management are with its publisher, Center for Bioresource Research (CBR) Islamabad, Pakistan. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • UFRJ a Paleoentomofauna Brasileira
    Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ www.anuario.igeo.ufrj.br A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual The Brazilian Fossil Insects: Current Scenario Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Scheler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências: Patrimônio Geopaleontológico, Museu Nacional, Quinta da Boa Vista s/nº, São Cristóvão, 20940-040. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Recebido em: 24/01/2018 Aprovado em: 08/03/2018 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2018_1_142_166 Resumo O presente trabalho fornece um panorama geral sobre o conhecimento da paleoentomologia brasileira até o presente, abordando insetos do Paleozoico, Mesozoico e Cenozoico, incluindo a atualização das espécies publicadas até o momento após a última grande revisão bibliográica, mencionando ainda as unidades geológicas em que ocorrem e os trabalhos relacionados. Palavras-chave: Paleoentomologia; insetos fósseis; Brasil Abstract This paper provides an overview of the Brazilian palaeoentomology, about insects Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, including the review of the published species at the present. It was analiyzed the geological units of occurrence and the related literature. Keywords: Palaeoentomology; fossil insects; Brazil Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ 142 ISSN 0101-9759 e-ISSN 1982-3908 - Vol. 41 - 1 / 2018 p. 142-166 A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Schefler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes 1 Introdução Devoniano Superior (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004). Os insetos são um dos primeiros organismos Algumas ordens como Blattodea, Hemiptera, Odonata, Ephemeroptera e Psocopera surgiram a colonizar os ambientes terrestres e aquáticos no Carbonífero com ocorrências até o recente, continentais (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: Taxonomy and Distribution. Progress Report for 2009 Surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D
    International Dragonfly Fund - Report 26 (2010): 1-36 1 The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: taxonomy and distribution. Progress Report for 2009 surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D student at the Department of Entomology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Email: [email protected] Introduction Three families in the superfamily Calopterygoidea occur in China, viz. the Calo- pterygidae, Chlorocyphidae and Euphaeidae. They include numerous species that are distributed widely across South China, mainly in streams and upland running waters at moderate altitudes. To date, our knowledge of Chinese spe- cies has remained inadequate: the taxonomy of some genera is unresolved and no attempt has been made to map the distribution of the various species and genera. This project is therefore aimed at providing taxonomic (including on larval morphology), biological, and distributional information on the super- family in South China. In 2009, two series of surveys were conducted to Southwest China-Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces. The two provinces are characterized by karst limestone arranged in steep hills and intermontane basins. The climate is warm and the weather is frequently cloudy and rainy all year. This area is usually regarded as one of biodiversity “hotspot” in China (Xu & Wilkes, 2004). Many interesting species are recorded, the checklist and photos of these sur- veys are reported here. And the progress of the research on the superfamily Calopterygoidea is appended. Methods Odonata were recorded by the specimens collected and identified from pho- tographs. The working team includes only four people, the surveys to South- west China were completed by the author and the photographer, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 351–368 (2010). Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley region, Western Australia David L. Morgan Freshwater Fish Group, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – The King Edward River, in the far north of the Kimberley region of Western Australia drains approximately 10,000 km2 and discharges into the Timor Sea near the town of Kalumburu. This study represents an ichthyological survey of the river’s freshwaters and revealed that the number of freshwater fishes of the King Edward River is higher than has previously been recorded for a Western Australian river. Twenty-six strictly freshwater fish species were recorded, which is three species higher than the much larger Fitzroy River in the southern Kimberley. The study also identified a number of range extensions, including Butler’s Grunter and Shovel-nosed Catfish to the west, and the Slender Gudgeon to the north and east. A possibly undescribed species of glassfish, that differs morphologically from described species in arrangement of head spines, fin rays, as well as relative body measurements, is reported. A considerable proportion of Jenkins’ Grunter, which is widespread throughout the system but essentially restricted to main channel sites, had ‘blubber-lips’. There were significant differences in the prevailing fish fauna of the different reaches of the King Edward River system. Thus fish associations in the upper King Edward River main channel were significantly different to those in the tributaries and the main channel of the Carson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of
    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Wetlands Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description Citation: Hale, J. and Morgan, D., 2010, Ecological Character Description for the Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site. Report to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. Acknowledgements: Danny Rogers, Australasian Waders Studies Group (expert advice) Halina Kobryn, Murdoch University (mapping and GIS) The steering committee was comprised of representatives of the following organisations: • Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts • WA Department of Environment and Conservation (Kununurra) • WA Department of Water (Kununurra) • Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. The Water Act 2007 requires that in preparing the [Murray-Darling] Basin Plan, the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) must take into account Ecological Character Descriptions of declared Ramsar wetlands prepared in accordance with the National Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Niiwalarra Islands and Lesueur Island
    Niiwalarra Islands (Sir Graham Moore Islands) National Park and Lesueur Island Nature Reserve Joint management plan 2019 Management plan 93 Conservation and Parks Commission Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Parks and Wildlife Service 17 Dick Perry Avenue Technology Park, Western Precinct KENSINGTON WA 6151 Phone (08) 9219 9000 Fax (08) 9334 0498 dbca.wa.gov.au © State of Western Australia 2019 December 2019 ISBN 978-1-925978-03-2 (print) ISBN 978-1-921703-94-2 (online) WARNING: This plan may show photographs of, and refer to quotations from people who have passed away. This work is copyright. All traditional and cultural knowledge in this joint management plan is the cultural and intellectual property of Kwini Traditional Owners and is published with the consent of Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation on their behalf. Written consent from Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation must be obtained for use or reproduction of any such materials. Any unauthorised dealing may be in breach of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). All other non-traditional and cultural content in this joint management plan may be downloaded, displayed, printed and reproduced in unaltered form for personal use, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. NB: The spelling of some of the words for country, and species of plants and animals in language are different in various documents. This is primarily due to the fact that establishing a formal and consistent ‘sounds for spelling’ system for a language that did not have a written form takes time to develop and refine.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects in Kansas Book: 2016 Revised Taxonomy
    Insects in Kansas Book: 2016 Revised Taxonomy TAXONOMIC CHANGES TO INSECT ORDERS 1. Order Collembola, Springtails, are no longer classified as insects (pg. 38‐39) but were elevated to Class status 2. Order Thysanura, Bristletails and Silverfish are now split into their own Orders and Thysanura no longer exists as an Order name. a. Bristletails=Order Microcoryphia (pg. 40‐41) b. Silverfish=Order Zygentoma (pg. 40‐41) 3. Order Phasmatodea, walkingsticks, are sometimes referred to as Phasmida (pg. 55) 4. Order Blattodea now includes both cockroaches and termites (Order Isoptera is now a suborder) (pg. 84‐85) 5. Order Pscoptera, barklice, are now called Psocodea(pg. 86) 6. Orders Mallophaga and Anoplura (pg. 87‐92) are now in Psocodea as suborders 7. Order Hemiptera now includes the Order Homoptera (Homoptera is now a suborder) (pg. 121‐ 418) 8. Order Neuroptera now includes lacewings, owlflies, and antlions but NOT dobsonflies (see #9) (pg. 153‐159) 9. Order Megaloptera now includes dobsonflies, alderflies, and fishflies (pg. 153‐159) TAXONOMIC CHANGES TO INSECT FAMILIES 1. Cave and camel crickets are now in the Family Rhapidophoridae not Gryllacrididae (pg. 73) 2. Ant crickets have been put into their own Family now called Myrmecophilidae (pg. 74‐75) 3. Red‐legged Earwigs are now in the Family Anisolabididae (pg. 78) 4. German and wood cockroaches are now in the Family Ectobiidae, F. Blattellidae is no longer valid (pg. 82‐83) 5. Family Liposcelidae is now called Liposcelididae (pg. 86) 6. Pubic lice are now in their own Family Phthiridae (pg. 92) 7. Family Pentatomidae no longer includes the Shield bugs or shield‐backed bugs (pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin International Airport Landscape Treatments
    Darwin International Airport Landscape Treatments FINAL REPORT - 29.06.09 ISSUE E DARWIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS FINAL REPORT Northern Territory Airports Pty Ltd PO Box 40996 CASUARINA NT 0811 CLOUSTON Associates Landscape Architects • Urban Designers • Landscape Planners Level 1, 1 Briggs Street • Darwin • NT 0801 PO Box 1118 • Darwin • NT 0801 Telephone (08) 8941 2450 • Facsimile (08) 8981 8230 Email • [email protected] ND609 • Issue E • 29.06.09 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title page CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 LANDSCAPE treatments summary 5 INTRODUCTION 6 LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS 7 HIGHLIGHT LANDSCAPE treatment SHOWCASE LANDSCAPE treatment STRUCTURE LANDSCAPE treatment UTILITY LANDSCAPE treatment habitat LANDSCAPE treatment APPENDIX - BANNED SPECIES list 20 DARWIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS • ISSUE E JUNE 2009 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Darwin International Airport masterplan identifies a range of uses and functions that include airport operations, tourist development, environmental areas and commercial opportunities. These functions are supported by existing services and infrastructure. All this occurs within a landscape framework. It is recognised that the landscape development of the site is a significant factor in establishing a distinct character that reflects the overall development philosophy and objectives as described in the Masterplan. The landscape masterplan prepared by Greening Australia in 2005 established a landscape approach ‘that incorporates and builds on the strengths of the Rapid Creek catchment’s unique plant communities that include riparian monsoon forest, eucalypt woodland, melaleuca swamps and wetlands”. The resultant landscape deliberately introduces international and national visitors to the beauty and diversity of the Top End environment and associated flora. In order to provide clear direction to future works within the precinct, it has been recognised that a ‘kit of part’ comprising distinct landscape treatments is required.
    [Show full text]