Local Government Arrangements in Cork the Report of the Cork Local
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local Government Arrangements in Cork The Report of the Cork Local Government Committee September 2015 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................. 2 Chair’s Foreword ................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations and next steps ................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Establishment of the Committee....................................................................... 13 1.2 Work of the Committee .................................................................................... 14 2. Setting the Context..................................................................................................... 16 2.1 A word on areas and their definitions............................................................... 16 2.2 The historical context ....................................................................................... 18 2.3 The international context.................................................................................. 20 2.4 The national context ......................................................................................... 22 2.5 The local context .............................................................................................. 29 3. Summary of issues raised in submissions.................................................................. 34 4. Status quo not an option............................................................................................. 38 5. Options for local government arrangements.............................................................. 41 6. The case for a unitary authority ................................................................................. 44 Economic and social development ............................................................................ 44 Governance, accountability and local democracy ..................................................... 48 Service delivery ......................................................................................................... 50 Financial impact and complexity............................................................................... 51 Efficiency................................................................................................................... 53 2 7. The case against boundary extension......................................................................... 55 8. Conclusions, recommendations and next steps.......................................................... 57 8.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 57 8.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................ 57 8.3 Elaboration on key aspects of the recommended arrangements....................... 60 8.4 Towards implementation – the next steps ........................................................ 63 References......................................................................................................................... 64 Appendix 1 Cork Local Government Review: Terms of Reference.............................. 68 Appendix 2 List of those who made submissions.......................................................... 73 Appendix 3 Consultation process .................................................................................. 78 Appendix 4 Maps........................................................................................................... 80 Appendix 5 Overview of selected international experience with local government reorganisation, mergers and amalgamation ...................................................................... 89 Appendix 6 Minority Report........................................................................................ 106 3 Chair’s Foreword Dear Minister, It is with great pleasure I present to you the report of the Cork Local Government Committee. I believe this report offers a unique, once in a lifetime opportunity for Cork and its citizens. A chance for a new beginning for local government in Cork. We have listened closely to everyone who has made a submission or expressed views about the best way forward. I strongly believe the solution we have come up with of one council to serve the whole of Cork, city and county, represents a ‘win-win’ situation for Cork. At the heart of our proposal is a council with a strong city metropolitan division at its core that will be the powerhouse and driver of development for the Cork region. Pooling resources and operating as a single council promoting ‘One Cork’ and speaking with one voice will enable the new authority to bring together resources at regional level so as to put Cork in a much stronger position both nationally and internationally. Our proposal sees a united and unified council that will be a model of excellence in delivering efficient, effective and innovative local government. It will enable Cork to develop centres of excellence in the delivery of services across the region in areas such as economic development, housing and planning. The council will have the capacity to meet the diverse needs of county and city residents in a way that is both dynamic and responsive to local concerns. Of course not everyone will agree with our proposal. And indeed within the committee we had robust discussions and disagreements about the best way forward. But we are all agreed that maintaining the status quo is not an option. A larger metropolitan area is needed as is a local government system that strengthens the region. The proposal we have developed offers a way forward to address these challenges. Under our new model, the existing anomalies in services between the city and the county will be eliminated. The different back office systems and processes will be streamlined 4 and a simplified approach for citizens throughout the region introduced. This consistent approach for all Cork citizens, combined with political governance structures that put the city and metropolitan area at the heart of the council, will strengthen local government and democracy in the region with Cork citizens being put first. I would like to emphasise two important elements of our proposal. One is that there should be substantial devolution of powers from central government to the new Cork authority. We indicate how this is possible in our concluding chapter. The other is that municipal and metropolitan districts should be strengthened to give them a stronger role in local government. These are important parts of the proposal and support our vision for Cork local government. I would also like to emphasise that the majority of members opted for unification both because we believe it is the best way forward for local government in Cork, but also because we believe that the evidence indicates that a boundary extension is, in effect, unworkable, for the following main reasons: • Two separate authorities would lead to more divergent and potentially conflicting views on what is best for Cork. Planning for balanced economic and social development would become more difficult. • There is a significant risk of major erosion of the greenbelt contrary to the agreed proposals of sustainable development set out in the CASP. • In an enlarged city it will be more difficult to focus on the city centre, with the satellite towns likely taking more development. • There are major financial complexities associated with boundary extension. These include ongoing payment of subventions from the city to the county, debt transfer from county to city, transfer of assets and liabilities, valuations, and associated legal complexity. Payments estimated at up to €36 million per annum from the city to the county arising from the extension of the city boundary are simply unsustainable. 5 • A boundary change of the scale envisaged is way beyond any previous boundary extension in the state, and is effectively a merger for the staff and structures affected. Just under 400 staff would be likely to need to transfer from the county to the city. There would be major challenges associated with this level of staff transfer. • It is not clear how the area which would remain the responsibility of the county would work organisationally or structurally. This area would not be a cohesive unit, would have no clear focal point and would be far removed from the existing council headquarters. • Historical evidence tells us that boundary extension has not and cannot work despite numerous failed and deeply acrimonious attempts over the last 50 years After our extensive deliberations I am confident that the city will flourish as the centre of a strong united Cork. The position of Cork city as the centre of a dynamic city region and an effective counter balance to the growth of Dublin can be advanced more effectively in a unified structure than with two stand-alone structures. Much more can be achieved with a unitary authority and combined resources than with divided responsibility. The model that is being proposed for Cork is more than just a merger. There would be an irresistible