54 Seanad Éireann 753
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The General Election in 2007
Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title The "green wave" that never happened: the general election in 2007 Author(s) Rau, Henrike Publication Date 2010 Rau, H (2010) 'The "green wave" that never happened: the Publication general election in 2007' In: P. Share and M.P. Corcoran (eds) Information Ireland of the Illusions: A Sociological Chronicle 2007-8. Dublin: IPA. Dublin : IPA. Publisher Institute of Public Administration Link to publisher's http://www.ipa.ie/index.php?lang=en&p=product&id=240&pro version did=167 Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/3884 Downloaded 2021-09-25T09:03:33Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. Published as: Rau, H. (2010) ‘The “Green Wave” That Never Happened: The General Election in 2007’, in P. Share and M.P. Corcoran (eds) Ireland of the Illusions: A Sociological Chronicle 2007-8. Dublin: IPA, pp. 163-175. CHAPTER 11 The ‘Green Wave’ that Never Happened: The 2007 General Election HENRIKE RAU General elections provide a useful snapshot of public opinion in Ireland. People’s voting patterns tend to reflect their values and attitudes, which both mirror and influence wider social and economic conditions. The general election in June 2007 and its aftermath captured the mood of the Irish electorate at a time when some already predicted that the economic boom of the Celtic Tiger years would come to an abrupt end. Prior to the election, speculation abounded about a radical transformation of the Irish political landscape. -
Political Journalism Since the Foundation of the State
Chapter 12 Social media and political communication Martin Molony The election of Barack Obama in 2008 was widely regarded as being an internet election victory. Greengard (2009, 16) described Obama as ‘the first internet president’ and there was widespread agreement amongst political commentators and digital media experts as to ‘how politicians and the public interact [would] never be the same.’ In the days following Obama’s election, The New York Times reflected on the repetition of history in the effective use of a new medium: ‘One of the many ways that the election of Barack Obama as president has echoed that of John F. Kennedy is his use of a new medium that will forever change politics. For Mr Kennedy, it was television. For Mr Obama, it is the internet’ (Miller, 2008). Commentators, such as Huffington Post founder and editor-in-chief, Arianna Huffington (2008) went further and believed that the Obama win was entirely due to his use of the web: ‘Were it not for the Internet, Barack Obama would not be president. Were it not for the Internet, Barack Obama would not have been the nominee.’ But was Obama’s win entirely down to successful use of the internet? Why did he win when, just four years earlier, Howard Dean had failed having used the same approach? One might assume that Barack Obama perfected Dean’s trial use of internet technologies but it is also reasonable to suggest that such electronic communication had come of age and that the electorate was sufficiently comfortable with the technologies to engage with their preferred candidate. -
Child Literacy and Social Inclusion: Implementation Issues
National Economic and Social Forum The Challenge of Community Participation in the Delivery of Public Services The Challenge of Community Participation ChildThe Challenge Literacy of and in the Delivery of Public Services Exploring Local Participatory Governance in Ireland SocialCommunity Inclusion: Participation Published by the National Economic and Social Forum in the Delivery of Copies of the Report may be obtained from the Implementation Issues Government Sales Office Public Services Sun Alliance House, Molesworth Street, Dublin 2. or Supplementary Report The National Economic and Social Forum Exploring Local Participatory 16 Parnell Square, Dublin 1. Governance in Ireland Price c7.00 (PRN A10/0511) ISBN 1-8-99276-55-6 The Challenge of Community Participation in the Delivery of Public Services Exploring Local Participatory Governance in Ireland By Chris McInerney, Tipperary Institute and Dr. Maura Adshead, University of Limerick A report commissioned by the National Economic and Social Forum March 2010 Table of Contents Preface 5 Introduction and Overview 11 Section 1: Why Participatory Governance – the Conceptual and Policy Context 17 Introduction 17 Participatory Governance – Tensions, Challenges and Expectations 18 The Democracy Rationale 19 The Public Administration Rationale 28 The Social Inclusion Rationale 34 The Public Policy Rationale 38 Conclusion 45 Section 2: Participatory Governance in an Ideal World 49 Introduction 49 Deliberative Democracy 49 Associative Democracy 52 Empowered Deliberative Democracy 53 Conclusion 57 -
Prohibition of Depleted Uranium Weapons Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages Wednesday, 17 November 2010
Prohibition of Depleted Uranium Weapons Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages Wednesday, 17 November 2010 SECTION 1 An Cathaoirleach: Amendment No. 1 has been ruled out of order on the grounds that it would expand the scope of the Bill. [825]Amendment No. 1 not moved. Senator Dominic Hannigan: I move amendment No. 2: In page 3, subsection (2), line 14, after “Minister” to insert “for Foreign Affairs”. The purpose of the amendment is to insert “for Foreign Affairs” after “Minister” because there is no definition of “Minister” in the Bill. Senator Dan Boyle: I thank the Labour Party Senators for proposing this amendment. I believe it is a drafting improvement and I am quite happy to accept it. Amendment agreed to. Question proposed: “That section 1, as amended, stand part of the Bill.” Senator David Norris: I seek an explanation, although perhaps it will not be possible to provide one. Did I understand the Cathaoirleach to state amendment No. 1 was ruled out of order because it caused a charge on the Exchequer? An Cathaoirleach: No, it was ruled out of order for expanding the scope of the Bill. Senator David Norris: I see. I thank the Cathaoirleach. Question put and agreed to. SECTION 2 An Cathaoirleach: Amendment No. 3 is ruled out of order as it would expand the scope of the Bill. Amendment No. 3 not moved. Question proposed: “That section 2 stand part of the Bill.” Senator David Norris: I do not mean to be pestiferous but how can a deletion expand the scope of a Bill? Surely it would contract it. -
Local Government Arrangements in Cork the Report of the Cork Local
Local Government Arrangements in Cork The Report of the Cork Local Government Committee September 2015 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................. 2 Chair’s Foreword ................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations and next steps ................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Establishment of the Committee....................................................................... 13 1.2 Work of the Committee .................................................................................... 14 2. Setting the Context..................................................................................................... 16 2.1 A word on areas and their definitions............................................................... 16 2.2 The historical context ....................................................................................... 18 2.3 The international context.................................................................................. 20 2.4 The national context ........................................................................................ -
Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups
European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Guide to the 30th Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups ‘EAPN Ireland is a network of groups and individuals working against poverty and social exclusion. Our objective is to put the fight against poverty at the top of the European and Irish agendas’ Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 2 The Parties 4 Dáil Session Guide 5 A Brief Guide to Legislation 7 Dáil Committees 9 The TD in the Dáil 9 Contacting a TD 12 APPENDICES 1: List of Committees and Spokespersons 2: Government Ministers and Party Spokespersons 1 Introduction This Guide has been produced by the European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland. It is intended as a short briefing on the functioning of the Dáil and a simple explanation of specific areas that may be of interest to people operating in the community/NGO sector in attempting to make the best use of the Dáil. This briefing document is produced as a result of the EAPN Focus on Poverty in Ireland project, which started in December 2006. This project aimed to raise awareness of poverty and put poverty reduction at the top of the political agenda, while also promoting understanding and involvement in the social inclusion process among people experiencing poverty. This Guide is intended as an accompanying document to the EAPN Guide to Understanding and Engaging with the European Union. The overall aim in producing these two guides is to inform people working in the community and voluntary sector of how to engage with the Irish Parliament and the European Union in influencing policy and voicing their concerns about poverty and social inclusion issues. -
Register of Political Parties 23 July 2019
Na hAchtanna Toghcháin, 1992 go 2012 Electoral Acts, 1992 to 2012 (Section 25 of the Electoral Act, 1992 as substituted by Section 11 of the Electoral Act, 2001 and as amended by the Electoral (Amendment) Political Funding Act, 2012) _________________________________________ Clár na bPáirtithe Polaitíochta Register of Political Parties 23 July 2019 NAME OF PARTY EMBLEM ADDRESS OF NAME(S) OF OFFICER(S) TYPES OF EUROPEAN DETAILS OF PARTY AUTHORISED TO SIGN ELECTIONS/ PARLIAMENT – ACCOUNTING HEADQUARTERS AUTHENTICATING CERTIFICATES PART OF THE NAME OF UNITS AND OF CANDIDATES STATE POLITICAL RESPONSIBLE GROUP PERSONS Áras de Valera, Any one of the following persons:- Dáil Alliance of See Appendix 1 FIANNA FÁIL 65-66 Lower Mount Micheál Martin T.D. or European Liberals and Street, Dara Calleary T.D. or Local Democrats for Dublin 2. DO2 NX40 Seán Dorgan or Europe (ALDE) David Burke FINE GAEL 51 Upper Mount Any one of the following persons:- Dáil Group of the See Appendix 1 Street, Leo Varadkar T.D. European European Dublin 2. DO2 W924 Simon Coveney T.D. Local People's Party Tom Curran (Christian Terry Murphy Democrats) THE LABOUR 11 Hume Street Brendan Howlin T.D. or Dáil Socialists and See Appendix 1 PARTY Dublin 2. DO2 T889 Brian McDowell European Democrats Group Local THE WORKERS' 24A/25 Hill Street Any two of the following persons:- Dáil See Appendix 1 PARTY Dublin 1. James O’Brien European Seamus McDonagh Local Michael Donnelly Richard O’Hara COMMUNIST James Connolly Any one of the following persons:- Dáil PARTY OF IRELAND House, John Pinkerton European 43 East Essex Street, Eugene Mc Cartan Local Temple Bar, Dublin 2. -
Register of Political Parties 17 February 2021
Na hAchtanna Toghcháin, 1992 go 2012 Electoral Acts, 1992 to 2012 (Section 25 of the Electoral Act, 1992 as substituted by Section 11 of the Electoral Act, 2001 and as amended by the Electoral (Amendment) Political Funding Act, 2012) _________________________________________ Clár na bPáirtithe Polaitíochta Register of Political Parties 17 February 2021 NAME OF PARTY EMBLEM ADDRESS OF PARTY NAME(S) OF OFFICER(S) AUTHORISED TO TYPES OF ELECTIONS/ EUROPEAN DETAILS OF HEADQUARTERS SIGN AUTHENTICATING CERTIFICATES PART OF THE STATE PARLIAMENT – ACCOUNTING OF CANDIDATES NAME OF UNITS AND POLITICAL RESPONSIBLE GROUP/EUROPEAN PERSONS POLITICAL PARTY Áras de Valera, Any one of the following persons:- Dáil Renew Europe, See Appendix 1 FIANNA FÁIL 65-66 Lower Mount Micheál Martin T.D. or European Alliance of Liberals Street, Margaret Conlon or Local and Democrats for Dublin 2. DO2 NX40 Seán Dorgan or Europe (ALDE) David Burke FINE GAEL 51 Upper Mount Any one of the following persons:- Dáil Group of the See Appendix 1 Street, Leo Varadkar T.D. European European People's Dublin 2. DO2 W924 Simon Coveney T.D. Local Party (Christian John Carroll Democrats) Terry Murphy THE LABOUR 2 White Friars Alan Kelly T.D. or Dáil Socialists and See Appendix 1 PARTY Aungier Street Billie Sparks European Democrats Group Dublin 2 D02 A008 Local THE WORKERS' 8 Cabra Road Any two of the following persons:- Dáil See Appendix 1 PARTY Dublin 7 James O’Brien European Seamus McDonagh Local Michael Donnelly Richard O’Hara COMMUNIST James Connolly Any one of the following persons:- Dáil PARTY OF IRELAND House, John Pinkerton European 43 East Essex Street, Eugene Mc Cartan Local Temple Bar, Dublin 2. -
Thirteenth Annual Report
BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA HÉIREANN Doc No February 2010 1 CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… Membership of the Body……………………………………………………………… Political developments……………………………………………………………… The work of the Body………………………………………………………………… Thirty-sixth Plenary ……………………………………………………………… Thirty-seventh Plenary……………………………………………………………… Steering Committee………………………………………………………………… Committees…………………………………………………………………………… Staffing………………………………………………………………………………… Prospects for 2009…………………………………………………………………… APPENDIX 1: Membership of the Body…………………………………… APPENDIX 2: Reports and other documents approved by the Body……… APPENDIX 3: Work of Committees……………………………………… Committee A…………………………………………………………… Committee B…………………………………………………………… Committee C…………………………………………………………… Committee D…………………………………………………………… 2 APPENDIX 4: Staff of the Body…………………………………………… 3 FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH INTER-PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Introduction 1.This is the fourteenth annual report of the Assembly since it was decided at the Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. This Report summarises the work of the Assembly during 2008. Membership of the Body 2.There were a number of significant changes in membership during the year. In the eary spring, the British Co-Chair, the Rt Hon Paul Murphy, returned to the Cabinet and was replaced by the Rt Hon Peter Hain. Sean O‟Fearghail was replaced as an Irish Vice- Chair and Chair of Committee C by Ms Margaret Conlon. Most importantly for the future of the Body, the October session was attended for the first time by delegates from the Democratic unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist party. Political Developments General Overview 3. 2008 was a year of consolidation for the peace process in Northern Ireland following the restoration of devolved government in May 2007. A Programme for Government and Investment Strategy for Northern Ireland, along with the Budget, were passed by the Assembly on 28 and 29 January 2008. -
![THE SUPREME COURT [Appeal No: 069/2011]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/5641/the-supreme-court-appeal-no-069-2011-3315641.webp)
THE SUPREME COURT [Appeal No: 069/2011]
THE SUPREME COURT [Appeal No: 069/2011] Denham C.J. Murray J. Hardiman J. Fennelly J. O'Donnell J. McKechnie J. Clarke J. Between/ Ivor Callely Applicant/Respondent and Pat Moylan, Dan Boyle, Frances Fitzgerald, Camillus Glynn, Denis O'Donovan, Joe O'Toole, and Alex White (Members of the Select Committee on Members' Interests of Seanad Éireann), Committee on Members' Interests of Seanad Éireann and Seanad Éireann Respondents/Appellants Joint Judgment of Mr Justice O'Donnell and Mr Justice Clarke delivered the 9th of April, 2014. I Introduction 1. At one level this appeal concerns questions about the payment of expenses to a member of the Oireachtas and the procedures followed by an Oireachtas Committee in considering allegations arising out of such payments. At another level this appeal raises very important questions about the separation of powers and, in particular, the entitlement of the courts to review disciplinary decisions made by the Houses of the Oireachtas in relation to their own members. 2. The background to these proceedings starts with a public controversy which emerged in the middle of 2010. Suggestions were made of impropriety in the way in which the respondent (hereinafter “Senator Callely”) made claims for expenses. In late May and early June, formal complaints in writing were made by members of the public which were ultimately referred to the Committee on Members Interests of Seanad Éireann (although it is not clear that this is a juristic body). The first to seventh named appellants (hereinafter “the Committee”) are the members of the Committee who conducted hearings during June and July of 2010 and ultimately determined that Senator Callely had misrepresented his normal place of residence for the purposes of claiming such expenses. -
Thirteenth Annual Report on Its Work Over the Previous Twelve Months
BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA HÉIREANN Doc No 163 February 2010 1 CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………4 Membership of the Body…………………………………………………………… 4 Political developments……………………………………………………………… 4 The work of the Assembly……………………………………………………………9 Thirty-sixth Plenary ……………………………………………………………… 9 Thirty-seventh Plenary……………………………………………………………… 13 Committees………………………………………………………………… … … …19 Steering Committee………………………………………………………………… 20 Staffing…………………………………………………………………………………20 Prospects for 2009…………………………………………………………………… 20 APPENDIX 1: Membership of the Body……………………………………21 APPENDIX 2: Reports and other documents approved by the Body………26 APPENDIX 3: Work of Committees……………………………………… 30 Committee A…………………………………………………………… 30 Committee B…………………………………………………………… 31 Committee C…………………………………………………………… 33 Committee D…………………………………………………………… 34 2 APPENDIX 4: Staff of the Body…………………………………………… 35 3 FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Introduction 1.This is the fourteenth annual report of the Assembly since it was decided at the Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. This Report summarises the work of the Assembly during 2009. Membership of the Assembly 2. Among other changes to the membership of the Assembly, the spring saw the return of the British Co-Chair, the Rt Hon Peter Hain, MP, to the UK Cabinet as Secretary of State for Wales and the return of his successor in that post, the Rt Hon Paul Murphy, to the position -
Seanad E´Ireann
Vol. 188 Wednesday, No. 25 19 March 2008 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Wednesday, 19 March 2008. Business of Seanad ………………………………2037 Order of Business …………………………………2038 Undocumented Irish: Motion ……………………………2061 Motor Vehicle (Duties and Licences) Bill 2008: Second Stage …………………2061 Business of Seanad ………………………………2083 Passports Bill 2007: Committee Stage (resumed)………………………2084 Sustainable Residential Development: Motion ………………………2090 Adjournment Debate School Transport ………………………………2121 Schools Amalgamation ……………………………2125 Services for People with Disabilities…………………………2129 2037 2038 SEANAD E´ IREANN have selected the matters raised by Senators Nicky McFadden, John Paul Phelan and Joe ———— O’Reilly and they will be taken at the conclusion of business. Senators Pearse Doherty and Brian De´ Ce´adaoin, 19 Ma´rta 2008. O´ Domhnaill may give notice on another day of Wednesday, 19 March 2008. the matters they wish to raise. ———— Order of Business. Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar Senator Donie Cassidy: The Order of Business 2.30 p.m. is No. 17, motion 35, an all-party motion re the undocumented Irish in the United States, to be ———— taken without debate at the conclusion of the Order of Business; No. 1, Motor Vehicle (Duties Paidir. and Licences) Bill 2008 — Second Stage, to be Prayer. taken at the conclusion of No. 17, motion 35, and on which spokespersons may speak for 12 ———— minutes and all other Senators eight minutes and in respect of which Members may, with the agree- Business of Seanad. ment of the House, share time; No. 2, Passports Bill 2007 — Committee and Remaining Stages, to An Cathaoirleach: I have notice from Senator be taken at the conclusion of No.