Evogenesis.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evogenesis.Pdf EvoGenesis Easy answers to evolution The ultimate answer to evolution and the crisis in creationism John Thomas 1 2 CONTENTS PART 1 EVOGENESIS- THE REAL ORIGIN OF SPECIES 1.1 The Genesis Alternative 1.2 An Overview Of EvoGenesis PART 2 WHERE DARWIN WENT WRONG 2.1 The Darwin Delusion 2.2 Evolution Fails Fossil Test 1 2.3 Evolution Fails Fossil Test 2 2.4 Jean Baptiste Lamarck 2.5 The Origin of Variation 2.6 A Brief History of Complexity 2.7 Complexity Within Complexity 2.8 Every Body Needs a Bauplan 2.9 Neo-Darwinism 2.10 Cuvier the Catastrophist 2.11 The Self-developing Genome 2.12 Another Look at Natural Selection 2.13 The Missing Link 2.14 Faith, Assumption and Dogma 2.15 Darwin's Personal Agenda 2.16 The Birth of Geology 2.17 Rocks & Fossils 2.18 Dinosaurs and Dragons 2.19 Radiometric Dating 2.20 The Curse of Evolution PART 3 A CLOSER LOOK AT THE GENESIS ACCOUNT OF CREATION 3.1 Questions & Answers 3.2 In the Beginning 3.3 Chaos! 3.4 Day One- A Special Light 3.5 Day Two - Waters above & Waters below 3.6 Day Three - The Dry Land, the Sea & Plants 3.7 Day Four - The Sun, the Moon & Stars 3.8 Day Five- Fish & Birds 3.9 Day Six - Cattle, Creeping Things and Beasts 3.10 Day Six - Man 3.11 Day Six- Everything was Good 3.12 Eden 3.13 The Flood of Noah - Some Questions 3.14 The Ark 3.15 The Deluge 3.16 The Aftermath Conclusions 3 4 PREFACE HISTORY REPEATING History, we are told, has a habit of repeating itself. The ancient Greek philosophers, for example, debated the ultimate nature of matter. Some thought it could be cut up into ever smaller pieces, ad infinitum. Others, such as Democritus, argued that you would finally arrive at a piece so small that it could not be cut up any further- that ultimate particle would be un-cuttable, or "a-tomic". It was then not until 1805 that John Dalton published his atomic theory, suggesting that elemental matter was indeed composed of apparently indivisible particles of elements such as carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, that bonded together in simple ratios to form compounds such as water, H20 or methane, CH4. Thus the atomic theory developed and it was discovered that there were 92 kinds of atoms which could be arranged and grouped into a "Periodic Table of Elements". Chemistry had arrived.All could be explained. Problem solved! Democritus was right! ... Until, that is, the discovery of something called radioactivity, and the fact that all atoms are in tum composed of protons, neutrons and electrons - which in tum can be subdivided .. And so the search for the ultimate particles still continues today. Those Higgs bosons must be out there somewhere! In a similar fashion, Darwin claimed that all organisms were the result of gradual evolution from some simple original life forms. Actually, he was just reviving another claim of the ancient Greek philosophers who also wanted to exclude God from their lives. But his theory was acclaimed by many- the more so with the discovery that just as all materials are composed of atoms, so all organisms contain DNA, and must therefore be related. Problem solved! Darwin was right! . .. But then, further research revealed inexplicable complexity within complexity! For example, in every cell, the genes are arranged in hierarchies several layers deep, with "slave" genes being controlled and switched on an off at the appropriate times by "master" genes. Wow! And then it was realized that although the genes could 1 manufacture proteins for tissue formation, they lacked the geometrical information to direct the growth of an embryo, or work together to shape an arm or a leg.And how could the incredible complexity of every detail of every organism on earth have possibly created itself by the accumulation of DNA copying errors anyway? Clearly, DNA was no longer the whole story- leading thoughtful evolutionist Rupert Sheldrake to revive another old idea, the notion that the geometry of all organisms is controlled by an invisible, intangible "morphic field", just as iron filings are moved into patterns by a magnetic field. And so, history begins repeating itself ... A NEW SYNTHESIS According to the classic historical pattern, understanding of complex issues swings like a pendulum from a traditional Thesis to an opposing Antithesis, then finally back to a middle ground of Synthesis. As knowledge grows that process may be repeated, over and over, refining knowledge in any field. So it is that in the past couple of centuries the world's dominant understanding of human and biological origins has swung from simplistic Young-earth creationism over to Darwinian evolution, with its increasingly complicated jargon. However, it has become clear that both beliefs are a mixture of truth and error - suggesting that the time has come for a new synthesis, for which we suggest the name "EvoGenesis". OUR MISSION The aim of this book, then, is to separate fact from fallacy in the teachings of both evolution and young-earth creationism-and then combine their truths to form a scripturally and scientifically accurate new Synthesis, as a basis for further study. We invite readers to join us in this mission, to help us refine that new synthesis - EvoGenesis - to develop a Christian consensus, a simple literal yet scientifically credible interpretation of the Genesis account of creation. Please contact us at www.EvoGenesis.co.uk or www.GapTheorv.net 2 3 INTRODUCTION FACT AND FICTION In this devastating expose of the shocking facts that destroy the fiction of evolution that has hoodwinked the intellectual elite of the western world for over a century, Random House author John Thomas shows that Charles Darwin's theory is, on close inspection, found to be a complete tissue of half-truths, unwarranted assumption, deliberately vague verbosity and wishful thinking. It is in fact little more than an atheistic faith whereby "all things are possible" for the true believer - as with the deluded Darwin himself. PREPOSTEROUS NONSENSE No wonder it is reported that biologists and mathematicians brave enough to risk their careers by querying the revered dogma, now see it for the preposterous nonsense it is -- totally unfit to explain the incredible "complexity within complexity" of the "simplest" living organism. Let alone sex, male and female forms, instinct, mind or emotion, etc. So, on yer bike, Dr Dawkins, you have been rumbled! And step aside you cowering coprolites, for the game is up, and the word is out, on the streets - Evolution is bunk and should now be quietly layed to rest with Darwin and the Dodo. THE CRISIS IN CREATIONISM The report is must reading for any Christian person looking for a simple but technically accurate explanation of the pros and cons of the evolution/creation debate - and why it is, despite the glaring errors of evolution, that creationists frequently find themselves regarded by the media, school boards, law courts, and the scientific community as superstitious peasants. Sadly, although creationism is in crisis, it is also in stubborn denial of the facts - once again bringing the Bible into scientific disrepute, as in the days of Galileo. THE LITERAL TRUTH OF GENESIS By revisiting and updating the oddly neglected old-earth, gap-theory teachings of Thomas Chalmers and Rev. William Buckland, Oxford University's very first professor of geology, our author discovers new insights that confirm the scientific accuracy of the Genesis account of creation. 4 AN OLD EARTH Although young-earth creationists vehemently reject the possibility of an old earth, using specious scriptural arguments, equally devout but professionally qualified believers, such as the members of the Affiliation of Christian Geologists and the Society of Ordained Scientists know better, but do little to publicize their position at the present time. Hopefully, the time for change has come. 5 PARTl EVOGENESIS (THE REAL ORIGIN OF SPECIES) 1.1 The Genesis Alternative 1.2 An Overview Of EvoGenesis 6 1.1 THE GENESIS ALTERNATIVE Although Charles Darwin's seductive theory of the origin of species by means of evolution has beguiled the intellectual elite of the western world for over a century, many people, even Nobel scientists, still cannot conceive that the incredible complexity and elegant design now revealed by the electron microscope in the simplest living organism, or even a single cell, could possibly have originated from the accumulation of random DNA copying errors when some primitive common ancestor somehow learned to reproduce. Let alone discover sex, with independent male and female forms, or mind, instinct and emotion, or even assemble the DNA itself from individual, inert atoms. In fact, many readers may be surprised to learn that, despite the massive media hype, and evolution's pervasive influence in every university science course and biology textbook, Darwin's theory still continues to fail two simple scientific tests he set for it himself, and still lacks a credible mechanism, as honest insiders will admit. A truly astonishing state of affairs. Despite irresponsible claims by the BBC that "evolution is a fact", it remains at best, a half truth -- for although the limit-ed variation now called "micro-evolution" that shaped Darwin's thinking is a fact of life, as exploited by plant and cattle breeders for thousands of years to produce new varieties, its limitless extrapolation to try to account for the creation of totally new organisms by the myth of "macro­ evolution" is still unjustified by the findings of geology and the fossil record, as we shall see. Evolution is in fact a gargantuan fraud, perpetrated by a desperate and disillusioned man, as every Christian person should understand and help expose.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter Vocabulary in ORDER of APPEARANCE
    FLOODED Chapter Vocabulary IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE Use this list to make vocabulary assignments (e.g., for quizzes and exams) for your students as they proceed through the text. The vocabulary words are listed in the order they appear in the text. NOTE: The definitions are found in the Glossary and, in some cases, in the Chapter text. When an abbreviated defi- nition of a word is given in the text, have the students memorize the technical definition from the Glossary instead, if it is available. FLOODED WITH Part 1 CREATIVITY The World Before the Flood Part 1—Flooded with Creativity: The World Before the Flood INTRODUCTION 8. Body fossil 30. Paleozoic (rock layers) 1. Science 9. Trace fossil 31. Pre-Cambrian (rock layers) 2. Biology 10. Mold fossil 32. Habitat 3. Astronomy 11. Cast fossil 33. Oceanography 4. Nomology 12. Petrology 34. Arthropod 5. Physics 13. Lithify 35. Brachiopod 6. Geology 14. Sediment 36. Cephalopod 7. Naturalist 15. Sedimentology 37. Fish 8. Evolution 16. Sedimentary rock 38. Amphibian 9. Kind 17. Secular 39. Mammal 10. Mature Creation 18. Permineralization 40. Entomology 11. Taxonomy 19. Petrification 41. Invertebrate 12. Zoology 20. Organic 42. Extinct 13. Curse 21. Paleontology 43. Extant 22. Excavation 44. Scientific prediction CHAPTER 1 23. Cretaceous 45. Mollusk 1. Botany 24. Dinosaur 46. Malacology 2. Herbivore 25. Mesozoic (rock layers) 47. Marine 3. Taphonomy 26. Erode 48. Herpetology 4. Fossil record 27. Erosion 49. Vertebrate 5. Fossil 28. Geologic column 50. Cynodont 6. Microfossil 29. Cenozoic (rock layers) 51. Reptile 7. Fossilization 52. Ornithischian 85. Gymnosperm 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Analysis of Article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth Is Young" by Jeff Miller
    1 Critical analysis of article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth is Young" by Jeff Miller Lorence G. Collins [email protected] Ken Woglemuth [email protected] January 7, 2019 Introduction The article by Dr. Jeff Miller can be accessed at the following link: http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=5641 and is an article published by Apologetic Press, v. 39, n.1, 2018. The problems start with the Article In Brief in the boxed paragraph, and with the very first sentence. The Bible does not give an age of the Earth of 6,000 to 10,000 years, or even imply − this is added to Scripture by Dr. Miller and other young-Earth creationists. R. C. Sproul was one of evangelicalism's outstanding theologians, and he stated point blank at the Legionier Conference panel discussion that he does not know how old the Earth is, and the Bible does not inform us. When there has been some apparent conflict, either the theologians or the scientists are wrong, because God is the Author of the Bible and His handiwork is in general revelation. In the days of Copernicus and Galileo, the theologians were wrong. Today we do not know of anyone who believes that the Earth is the center of the universe. 2 The last sentence of this "Article In Brief" is boldly false. There is almost no credible evidence from paleontology, geology, astrophysics, or geophysics that refutes deep time. Dr. Miller states: "The age of the Earth, according to naturalists and old- Earth advocates, is 4.5 billion years.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetic Resources
    APOLOGETIC RESOURCES A Young Earth ministry perspective, namely contrasting Scripture to true science now and during the ages. By Dr. Jim Pagels [email protected] 9/2016 Editor Dr. John Fricke, Emeritus Professor of Biology, Concordia University, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Copyright This book is offered as an educational resource on a no cost basis. Contents are not to be reproduced for the purpose of sale. Note that all Scriptural passages are taken from the English Standard Version. 1 I HAVE NO GREATER JOY THAN TO HEAR THAT MY CHILDREN WALK IN THE TRUTH III JOHN 1:4 Forward - Although there is much young Earth information available from commercial sources and on the internet, it was the impression of this writer that no resource that deals with basic topical issues correlating the young Earth philosophy and science exists for professional church workers. To this end, Apologetic Resources is being offered. Intended Audience – The intended audience of this reference material is primarily use by professional church workers, i.e., teachers, pastors, youth workers, etc., namely those who choose to uphold the literal interpretation of Genesis and the inerrancy of Holy Scripture. The focus in this regard is Young Earth Creationism and the catastrophic nature of the global Genesis Flood keeping in mind that Genesis 1-11 is foundational to most of the significant doctrines of Holy Scripture. Of course, laymen may well also find this reference a valuable resource. There is obviously a realistic interplay between Scripture, apologetics and true science. The goal of this document is to provide clarity to this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics of Aresian and Erosian Economy
    International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), Vol. 5 No 1, 2014, pp. 1-12 Available online at www.iim.ftn.uns.ac.rs/ijiem_journal.php ISSN 2217-2661 UDK 330.34:316.32 Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics of Aresian and Erosian Economy Imre Lázár Professor, Károli Gáspár University, Institute of Social Sciences and Communication Studies, Budapest, [email protected] Received (05.12.2013.); Revised (03.03.2014.); Accepted (15.03.2014.) Abstract In this paper we explore the ecodynamics of economic transformation of Central-East –European late socialist industries under the pressure of globalization. We use both term ARES and Eros in allegoric sense and as an acronym of Accumulation, Risk, Environmental degradation In this framework we deconstruct the process of the neoliberal transformation of local economies. Deconstruction of informational, technological and social dynamism also helps to reveal the hierarchical ranks of the four environmental actors feedingt the ARESian dynamics of contemporary economical and social phenomena. Key words: 4T tetrahedron ecodynamic modell, the neoliberal economic turn, diversity 1. INTRODUCTION nonhuman animals and the human history concluding that cooperation and mutual aid is one of the leading Economy is an environmentally and ecologically factors in the survival and the evolution of species. and embedded anthropological system of human the ability to survive. subsistence being liable to harsh ecodynamics of co- evolving actors: nature, social and technological Ecology teaches us that both form is relevant (being contributions, and knowledge. In a holistic frame of usually mixed) in the complex ecodynamics of reference of our MEO model [1] economical evolution ecorelations, nevertheless the one-sided view of appears to be a human ecological drama in the evolutionary logic of competitive vision of global everchanging civilizational stage.
    [Show full text]
  • If Truth Be Known
    If Truth Be Known This book is an examination of claims of scientific support for the views 1) that Earth is a recent creation, not more than several thousand years old, and 2) that much of the current topography of the Earth and many (or most) of the fossil-bearing rock layers in Earth’s crust are the result of a cataclysm that includes a worldwide flood in recent time. The discussion within this book is permeated by the conviction that modern science is compatible with Christian faith. by Clarence Menninga Copyright ©2012 Clarence Menninga All rights reserved ISBN-13: 978-0-9858823-0-3 Cover photo Palouse Falls, Washington, USA Photo Courtesy of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory The height of the falls is 198 feet. The channel of the Palouse River is carved through several successive lava flows of the Columbia Basin Basalts. (See Chapter 15 for more details.) The contacts between successive lava flows are clearly seen; the lip of the falls is near the top of one flow, with an older, thicker flow below that. There is a more recent flow above and immediately to the left and right of the lip of the falls, and a thicker, still more recent flow above that one is visible beyond the stream channel, with some weathered remnants of that layer visible above and to the left of the lip of the falls. Dedicated to all my teachers Acknowledgments I owe a huge debt of gratitude to my colleagues at Calvin College, especially to those Faculty members in the sciences, and those in theology and religion, both in the College and in Calvin Theological Seminary, for refining my understanding through many discussions of the relationships of science and Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Download January 2020
    INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH ICR.org JANUARY 2020 ACTSVOL. 49 NO. 1 FACTS & Homo naledi : Another Failed Evolutionary Ape-Man page 10 The Plan to Replace God page 14 Survival of the Fittest and Evolution’s Death Culture page 17 Do Earth’s Rocks Look Old? page 20 2020 - 50 CreationYears1970 Research of $24.99 BHMMFOMC HENRY M. MORRIS Hardcover Dr. Henry M. Morris, founder of the Institute for Creation Research, spent a lifetime investigating scientific evidence that confirms the Bible. In Henry M. Morris: Father of Modern Creationism, you’ll see how God used this humble man to boldly proclaim the veracity of His Word. Dr. Morris’ work rebuilt Christians’ confidence in the accu- racy of the Bible and turned many toward Christ for the first time. LITTLE CREATION BOOKS You and Me Space Noah’s Ark 6 Days of Dinosaurs Fish Have Always $5.99 • BYAMBB $5.99 • BSBB $5.99 • BNABB Creation $5.99 • BDBB Been Fish $5.99 • B6DOCBB $5.99 • BFHABFBB SCIENCE FOR KIDS $24.99 Buy the whole set and save $10! $35.96 God Made Gorillas, PSFK4 God Made You Dinosaurs: God’s Mysterious Creatures $7.99 Space: God’s Majestic Handiwork BGMGGMY Animals by Design: Exploring Unique Creature Features Earth: Our Created Home $8.99 $8.99 BDGMC BSGMH Big Plans for Henry A Little Book with a Big Plan Henry Plush Toy $8.99 $8.99 $8.99 • BBPFH $12.99 • GHTH BABDEUCF BEOCH Buy both for $15.99 • PBPFH Call 800.628.7640 or visit ICR.org/store | Please add shipping and handling to all orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design Kent Greenwalt
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 17 Article 2 Issue 2 Symposium on Religion in the Public Square 1-1-2012 Establishing Religious Ideas: Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design Kent Greenwalt Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Kent Greenwalt, Establishing Religious Ideas: Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design, 17 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 321 (2003). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol17/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES ESTABLISHING RELIGIOUS IDEAS: EVOLUTION, CREATIONISM, AND INTELLIGENT DESIGN KENT GREENAWALT* I. INTRODUCTION The enduring conflict between evolutionary theorists and creationists has focused on America's public schools. If these schools had no need to teach about the origins of life, each side might content itself with promoting its favored worldview and declaring its opponents narrow-minded and dogmatic. But edu- cators have to decide what to teach, and because the Supreme Court has declared that public schools may not teach religious propositions as true, the First Amendment is crucially implicated. On close examination, many of the controversial constitu- tional issues turn out to be relatively straightforward, but others, posed mainly by the way schools teach evolution and by what they say about "intelligent design" theory, push us to deep questions about the nature of science courses and what counts as teaching religious propositions.
    [Show full text]
  • Confessions of the Evolutionists
    ver since it was first put forward, certain materialist circles have attempt- ed to portray the theory of evolution as scientific fact. In fact, however, the theory, which claims that life emerged as the result of chance process- es, has been utterly disproved by all branches of science. Over the 150 or so years from the time of Charles Darwin, the founder of the theory, to the present day, scientific fields as palaeontology, biochemistry, genetics and anatomy have de- molished the theory’s assumptions one by one. The more the details of nature have been revealed, the more extraordinary characteristics have been discovered that can never be explained in terms of chance. For all these reasons, in the words of the famous molecular biologist Professor Michael Behe, evolution theory is “A theory in crisis.” This crisis that the theory is in leads scientists who support the theory to make a num- ber of confessions from time to time. These scientists do not reject the theory because of their materialist preconceptions, but they are aware of the fact that the theory conflicts with scientific findings. In this book you will find statements made by these evolutionist scientists regarding the theory they advocate. You will see that even though hundreds of evolutionists, from Charles Darwin to eminent present-day supporters of his theory, such as Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Leakey still advocate this theory, they have admitted that this theory is groundless, incorrect, and even ridiculous. If you want to see that Darwinism is a tale that even Darwinism’s most determined proponents do not believe in, you must read these confessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Contentious Fossils Cies As the Result of Degradation And/Or a Review of Cross-Breeding.1 Bone of Contention: Is Evolution True? 2
    Book Reviews Contentious fossils cies as the result of degradation and/or A review of cross-breeding.1 Bone of Contention: Is Evolution True? 2. Just what do the fossils Third edition prove? by Sylvia Baker Published by Biblical Crea- The three evolution-inspired ex- tion Society, UK. 2003 pectations of the fossil record, listed in the previous edition, have now been reduced to just two. The following Philip Bell statement has been dropped: ‘c. We should, of course, expect to This new-look edition of a popular find the rock strata themselves in and helpful booklet is described as the order given by the geological containing new material throughout column, with the oldest at or near the bottom, and the most recent at its pages. With the exception of one 2 illustration of corals, which appeared the top.’ on page 31 of the previous edition Perhaps this is to diffuse espoused by Steven Robinson in a potential criticism that creationist 3 (published by AiG), all the illustrations symposium in this Journal in 1996, but arguments about ‘out-of-place’ fossils from that edition are reproduced here, which (in my view) has been soundly represent a ‘straw man’ perspective of 4 and mostly in the same place in the text, refuted since, again in this journal. To the rocks, not held by paleontologists. giving the superficial appearance that be fair, Baker does not insist that the Alternatively, it could represent an very little has changed. word—machah in the Hebrew—must acknowledgement that the stratigraphic However, there are indeed a mean ‘blot out, without trace’.
    [Show full text]
  • CRSQ Volume 41
    Creation Research Society Quarterly Volume 41 June 2004 Number 1 Articles Departments Helium Diffusion Age of 6,000 Years Photographic Essay: Blood Reserve ................................. 23 Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay .......................... 1 D. Russell Humphreys, Steven A. Austin, John R. Book Reviews Baumgardner, and Andrew A. Snelling Forbidden Archeology’s Impact Jökullhlaups and Catastrophic Coal Formation .............. 17 by Michael Cremo .............................................. 21 Carl R. Froede Jr. The Man Who Found Time by Jack Repcheck ............ 45 Prey by Michael Crichton .......................................... 68 The Origin of the Brain and Mind ................................... 28 Brad Harrub and Bert Thompson The Never-Ending Story by Antonio Lazcano ............. 78 Dragon Hunter: Roy Chapman Andrews Mind, Materialism, and Consciousness........................... 46 Brad Harrub and Bert Thompson and the Central Asiatic Expeditions by Charles Gallenkamp....................................... 83 The Unbridgeable Chasm Between Microevolution and Macroevolution .................................................. 60 Letters to the Editor ........................................................80 Jerry Bergman Instructions to Authors ....................................................85 Notes from the Panorama of Science Membership/Subscription Application and Renewal Form ..........................................................87 Extrapolations from Humphreys’ Geomagnetic Data Reinforce His Young
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Age of the Earth, the Fossil Record and Noah's Flood
    Chapter 3: The age of the earth, the fossil record and Noah’s flood. A week later, Xiao Wang and Xiao Li returned to Professor Ho‘s office, arguing heatedly as they entered. ―Good afternoon boys!‖ Professor Ho greeted them happily, standing up behind his desk, which was strewn with books as always. ―What is it you‘re discussing?‖ Xiao Wang nodded in greeting and launched in: ―Professor Ho, I‘ve been researching what you‘ve discussed with us. I have to admit, I‘m something of an ‗intelligent design‘ theorist now. But I still have a big problem with your Bible cr- eationism. Scientists have found fossils in rock layers which show evolution happened for millions of years—‖ Xiao Li cut in: ―I already told him, Professor Ho, that that just means God used evolution! Evolution is God‘s tool- box.‖ Xiao Wang shook his head. ―That‘s ridiculous! I‘ve read the book of Genesis and it doesn‘t look in the least bit like evolution. The fossil record of evolution is a long, bloody process of struggle, death and change. If there was evolution, you don‘t need a God as a Creator!‖ ―You‘d still need a Creator!‖ countered Xiao Li. ―Life didn‘t start by itself, and animals wouldn‘t change into new forms by themselves by accident. Professor Ho proved that to us already. You still need God to drive evolution for- ward.‖ ―If there‘s a ‗god,‘ behind evolution, then he‘s sloppy and cruel. The fossil record looks nothing like the story of the Garden of Eden!‖ Xiao Li forced a look of patient wisdom onto his face.
    [Show full text]
  • Blog Booklet
    Synthetic Biology and Responsible language Use An Anthology of Blog Posts Brigitte Nerlich 4/8/2016 This booklet contains blog posts published between 2014 and 2016 as part of the work undertaken for the BBSRC/EPSRC funded Synthetic Biology Research Centre, University of Nottingham TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 1. History of synthetic biology Fermenting thought: A new look at synthetic biology 2. Advances in synthetic biology Making synthetic biology public: The case of XNAS and Xnazymes 3. Responsible language use and metaphors Synthetic biology, metaphors and ethics The book of life: Reading, writing, editing Gene editing, metaphors and responsible language use On the metaphorical origin of gene drives On books, circuits and life Precision metaphors in a messy biological world CRISPR hype A programming language for living cells 4. Synthetic biology, the media and the bioeconomy Synthetic biology markets: Opportunities and obstacles The bioeconomy in the news - or not 5. Responsible innovation and synthetic biology Making synthetic biology public From recombinant DNA to gene editing: A history of responsible innovation (including an appendix listing many subsequent articles and discussions on gene editing) Ta(l)king responsibility Pathways in Science and Society Acceleration, autonomy and responsibility 6. More general reflections on Responsible Research and Innovation Responsible innovation: Great expectations, great responsibilities RRI and impact: An impossiblist agenda for research? 7. Miscellaneous Advanced fermenters Synthetic biology or the modern Prometheus Natural/artificial The colours of biotechnology Synthetic biology comes to Nottingham 1 FOREWORD Synthetic biology is a rapidly maturing area of research which can be described as the design and construction of novel artificial biological pathways, organisms or devices.
    [Show full text]