LIES INTO FACTS AND BACK
Our kids are brain-washed by barrage of lies to indoctrinate them, unethically, into evolution religion instead of teaching them testable and proven curriculum culminating in an ever-staggering nihilistic culture, life, and living! ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE DR. KENT HOVIND OF CREATION SCIENCE EVANGELISM (CSE): HIS LECTURE “LIES IN THE TEXTBOOKS” AS WELL AS MANY OF HIS PUBLISHED LECTURES HAVE PROVIDED ME WITH RICH MATERIAL FOR THIS RESEARCH/PRESENTATION. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS DUE AS WELL TO CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (CMI), GENESIS APOLOGETICS (GA), ANSWERS IN GENESIS(AIG), THE INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH (ICR) (WWW.ICR.ORG ), CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (CMI), CREATION SCIENCE EVANGELISM (CSE), AND CREATION EVIDENCE MUSEUM OF TEXAS (CEMOT), AND CREATION SCIENCE EVANGELISM (CSE), AND CREATION EVIDENCE MUSEUM OF TEXAS (CEMOT), AND DAVID RIVES MINISTRIES (DRM). MUCH OF THE CONTENT HEREIN HAS BEEN DRAWN FROM (AND IS MEANT TO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH) THESE BIBLICAL CREATION MINISTRIES. I’VE ASKED THEM BY PHONE ABOUT USING THEIR PUBLISHED MATERIAL AND THEY WERE GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO GRANT IT TO ME FOR THE EDUCATION PURPOSE AND NOT FOR MAKING MONEY. IN TURN, ANYONE CAN USE THIS MATERIAL HERE WITHIN FOR EDUCATION PURPOSE ONLY.
MY DEEP GRATITUDE ALSO TO MANY DEAR FRIENDS FOR THEIR INVALUABLE ADVICE AND ENCOURAGEMENT WHO PREFERRED TO BE ANONYMOUS.
AT LAST BUT NOT LEAST I AM GRATEFUL TO MY DAUGHTER IRINA ISHAK FOR HER EDITING MUCH OF MY WRITING TO MAKE IT READABLE. APOLOGETICS 3 PRESENTATION SERIES
This is the eighth presentation in the Apologetics presentation series. The purpose of this series is to prepare our kids and youth and everyone to survive the vicious attacks on Christianity and God in all the education and media system. We will post a new presentation every 2-3 weeks. Look for subjects as:
Did Science Kill God? (posted) Iron Clad Evidence Where are we Heading (posted) Humanoid- Myth or Truth Big Bang or smoke screen (posted) The Incredible Design of the Human Body Creation antagonists witness (posted) The Amazing Created Human Brain (current) Evolution or delusion (posted) The Amazing Created Human Heart Evolutionists Plight (posted) The Amazing Created Human Respiratory System It is Young World After all (posted) The Amazing Created Human Digestive System Lies into Facts – Grand Canyon (current) The Amazing Created Human DNA Reclaiming Culture The Amazing Created Human Ear Satanic Aluminate – Doctrine that Damned America The Amazing Created Human Eye Scientific facts in The Bible The Amazing Created Human Reproduction Process Six days Creation Intelligent Design The Trojan of Deep Time A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism 4 WHY THIS SERIES?
The purpose of this series is to teach Apologetics to our people. It is very important that we equip our self by the right information about the existence of God & the authenticity and infallibility of His book all with evidence from science. This kind of education has never been so badly needed as it is now for our kids and youth to survive the vicious attacks on the Bible and God in all walks of life, be it school system, media, press, books, museums, colleges, social, entertainment, …etc. These vicious attacks, although as old as creation itself, it increased during the enlightenment age but it sky-rocketed since the 1970’s. The root cause of all this attacks unquestionably is the evolution theory which replaced the godly creation by godless one and therefor there is no need for a God with all the moral and legal responsibility to submit to His authority and commands and not living sinful life. This series will have sections refuting evolution be it cosmic, chemical, astronomical, organic, and biological. Other sections discussing all-or-nothing complex systems that are impossible to explain through bit-by-bit random evolutionary processes as incredible examples of God's handiwork in His creation. This current presentation discusses some of the fallacies in our kids' textbooks. These fallacies are printed year after year to indoctrinate our kids into evolution although they were proven wrong or supported by very flimsy evidences many even were denounced in published literature by evolutionists. For instance since 1977 over 41 papers published in prestigious scientific periodicals reporting blood and soft tissues in dinosaur fossils found by paleontologists, however the evolution communities dig their heels in the ground and scrupling to find justifications for these organic material to survive millions of years while deep in their hearts they know it is impossible. Let alone they ignore the fact that their own labs found 14C in all tested fossils and diamonds. If creationists did something similar, they would laugh them all the way out of the court. It is just one undisputable evidence of young world out of over 100 other evidences. I wouldn’t mind they believe the world is billions of years old ONLY don’t force feed this to our kids. Enough what the world suffered as direct result of spreading this nihilistic culture. Thou shalt learn “apologetics” 1 Peter 3:15 (rephrased)
CLICK HERE TO GET EQUIPPED TO SURVIVE NIHILISTIC CULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE DR. KENT HOVIND OF CREATION SCIENCE EVANGELISM (CSE): HIS LECTURE “LIES IN THE TEXTBOOKS” AS WELL AS MANY OF HIS PUBLISHED LECTURES HAVE PROVIDED ME WITH RICH MATERIAL FOR THIS RESEARCH/PRESENTATION. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS DUE AS WELL TO CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (CMI), GENESIS APOLOGETICS (GA), ANSWERS IN GENESIS(AIG), THE INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH (ICR) (WWW.ICR.ORG ), CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (CMI), CREATION SCIENCE EVANGELISM (CSE), AND CREATION EVIDENCE MUSEUM OF TEXAS (CEMOT), MUCH OF THE CONTENT HEREIN HAS BEEN DRAWN FROM (AND IS MEANT TO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH) THESE BIBLICAL CREATION MINISTRIES. I’VE ASKED THEM BY PHONE ABOUT USING THEIR PUBLISHED MATERIAL AND THEY WERE GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO GRANT IT TO ME FOR THE EDUCATION PURPOSE AND NOT FOR MAKING MONEY. IN TURN, ANYONE CAN USE THIS MATERIAL HERE WITHIN FOR EDUCATION PURPOSE ONLY.
MY DEEP GRATITUDE ALSO TO MANY DEAR FRIENDS FOR THEIR INVALUABLE ADVICE AND ENCOURAGEMENT WHO PREFERRED TO BE ANONYMOUS.
AT LAST BUT NOT LEAST I AM GRATEFUL TO MY DAUGHTER IRINA ISHAK FOR HER EDITING MUCH OF MY WRITING TO MAKE IT READABLE. UNACCEPTABLE 7
IT IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE AND BEYOND IMAGINATION THAT AFTER PLENTIFUL DISCOVERIES OF SOFT TISSUES AND BLOOD IN PARTIALLY- OR UN-FOSSILIZED DINOSAUR REMAINS THAT PALEONTOLOGY AND RELATED SCIENCE DISCIPLINES STILL MAINTAIN THAT DINOSAURS LIVED MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO AND REFUSE TO OBJECTIVELY AND SCIENTIFICALLY FACE THE UNDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE OF YOUNG EARTH. SPECIALLY THAT C14 TESTING ON FOSSILS, COAL, PETROL, & DIAMOND YIELDS RESULTS OF 50,000 YEARS OLD OR YOUNGER. MAJORITY OF AGING PROCESSES YIELD YOUNG EARTH AND UNIVERSE. RADIOMETRIC AGING PROCESSES YIELD ERRONEOUS INCONSISTENT AND UNRELIABLE AGE OF KNOWN LAVA SAMPLES. SCIENCE SHOULD BE UNBIASED AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN ITS GOAL OF UNCOVERING FACTS. OTHERWISE IT DOES NOT WARRANT OUR TRUST. IMAGINE IF A SIMILAR DISREGARD FOR THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS EXISTED IN PHARMACEUTICAL OR MEDICAL AREAS, AND THE DANGERS OF A NEWLY DEVELOPED DRUG OR SURGERY WAS HIDDEN FROM PATIENTS AND NOT DISCLOSED IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE TO AVOID LOSS OF SOME INVESTMENTS. IN THAT CASE WE WOULD LOSE OUR TRUST IN THEM. THE SAME GOES FOR ALL SCIENTIFIC AREAS. 8
THE MILLIONS OF YEARS CONSPIRACY Evolution keystones 9 We will discuss in this presentation the main “Evidences” taught as keystones for proving evolution unethically in all education levels Kindergarten to Post Graduate. 1. Grand Canyon was formed slowly by Colorado River. 2. From sea to land IN MILLIONS OF YEARS. 3. Micro to Macro evolution IN MILLIONS OF YEARS. 4. The Millions of years verified by radiometric aging processes. 5. Geologic column shows earth’s history. 6. Polystrate tree fossils are buried in millions of years layers. 7. Fossils take Millions of years to form. 8. MICRO leads to MACRO evolution. 9. Mutation leads to evolution. 10. The Peppered Moth Myth 11. Survival of the fittest produce evolution. 12. Homologous structures proves common ancestor. 13. Vestigial structures proves evolution. 14. Biogenetics "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny“ proves evolution. 15. Evolution is fact. KEYSTONE #1 10 GRAND CANYON KEYSTONE
• UNIFORMITARIANISM WAS PREDICTED BY PETER: “AND SAYING, WHERE IS THE PROMISE OF HIS COMING? FOR SINCE THE FATHERS FELL ASLEEP, ALL THINGS CONTINUE AS THEY WERE FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION.” 2 PETER 3:4 • “THE PRESENT IS THE KEY FOR THE PAST” IS THE UNIFORMITARIANISM PARADIGM, IT SHOULD BE “THE BIBLE IS THE KEY FOR THE PAST” . • GRAND CANYON, AND ALL THE ITEMS LISTED HENCEFORWARD, IS A ROCK-SOLID EVIDENCE THE PARADIGM IS WRONG AND THE TRUE PARADIGM IS BIBLICAL ONE. • There are too many evidences that Grand Canyon is the result of catastrophic worldwide flood like Noah flood just few thousand years ago. For instance, the sedimentation layers lay flat like pancake most of them extending to several states and even continents, there is no any erosion between the layers meaning they all were formed short time, the Kaibab lift show clearly the sedimentary layers were soft and pliable when lifted otherwise they would be broken and not just bent, the amount of fallen stones at the feet of the canyon consistent with few thousands not millions of years, the patina on the surface of the canyon is the same thickness top to bottom, rock ages are the same at any height, highest point in the canyon is over 2,500 feet higher than the Colorado river entrance to the canyon so it can’t be carved by the river in millions of years. All these evidences will be discussed in separate presentation.
Reference: How old is Grand Canyon? 12/30/2019 11
Grand Canyon was formed slowly by Colorado River
TOMBSTONE #1 KEYSTONE #2 FROM SEA TO LAND IN MILLIONS OF YEARS 12
The Lobe-finned fish Coelacanth which allegedly is the predecessor of the Amphibians some of which were evolved to land animals some 325 million years ago still well and alive without any changes from the fossils. More importantly, there is nothing in the fossil records shows any intermediate stage Lobe-finned fish are index fossils for 325- between fish and amphibians. 410 million year old rock? 13
From sea to land IN MILLIONS OF YEARS
TOMBSTONE #2 KEYSTONE #3 MICRO TO MACRO EVOLUTION IN MILLIONS OF YEARS 14
The coelacanth fish is taught to be extinct 325 Million years ago. It is supposed to be one step toward evolving the fish to land animal. Coelacanth was discovered well and alive in 1938. No difference can be found between the 325 million years old fossils and living coelacanth, it stayed the same for this supposedly log eon of time. Coelacanth is one of too many living fossils which show no evolution during these millions of years. Some of the living fossils: coelacanth, Horseshoe crab, Nautilidea, Frilled shark, Loatian rock rat, Okapo, Solenodon, Aardvark, Maidenhair, Monito dle monte, amami rabbit, Chevrotain, Red panda, Cyanobacteria. SAMPLES OF LIVING FOSSILS 15
Coelacanth, allegedly 65 Creation.com, please click on Nautilus, allegedly 505 million Both, inside and outside are million years ago. the black box below. Click to 408 million years ago. living fossils.
Living Fossils' Just A Branch On Horseshoe crap, allegedly Living Fossils, Evolution: The Cycad Family Tree, 65 million Source: The World’s Most 200 million years ago. Grand Experiment, Episode 2 years ago. Astounding Living Fossils .
If all these creatures and a lot more did not change a bet in eons of ages PLUS there is nothing in the fossil records showing any transitions why do we have to believe that micro evolution leads to macro evolution? Makes no sense, isn’t it? Just never mind the millions of years, they are alleged anyway. SAMPLES OF LIVING FOSSILS 16
tuatara, a lizard-like reptile, allegedly Platypus, allegedly 166 million years Manlis Shrimp some 200 million years ago. ago. Coblin Shark , allegedly 124 MY ago.
Mouse deer, better known as a Alligator, allegedly 320 million years Sea pwns, over hundreds of millions of Cockroach, allegedly 320 MY ago chevrotain, allegedly 35 MY ago. ago. years
As mentioned before, if all these creatures and a lot more did not change a bet in eons of ages PLUS there is nothing in the fossil records showing any transitions why do we have to believe that micro evolution leads to macro evolution? Makes no sense, isn’t it? Just never mind the millions of years, they are alleged anyway. 15 Tenacious Living Fossils 17
Click this link: 15 Tenacious Living Fossils MICRO EVOLUTION LEADS TO 18 MACRO EVOLUTION 3
Students are given a definition of the word that is only micro-evolution ...
Prentice Hall Earth Science 1999 p. 627 MICRO LEADS TO MACRO 19 EVOLUTION
Most evolutionists tell you that macro-evolution is just micro-evolution over longer periods of time. This is dreaming! “The central question of the 1980 Chicago conference of about 150 of the world's leading evolutionary theorists was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. … the answer can be given as a clear, No.” Roger Lewin, “Evolution Theory Under Fire” Science vol. 210, Nov. 21, 1980, p. 883 See also Question Evolution! - CMI's Rebuttals to Responses to Questions 4 through 8 MICRO LEADS TO MACRO 20 EVOLUTION
“Darwin’s theory is presented through scientific falsification. Genetic mutations never add new information, but, on the contrary, the result is always a loss of information as shown by the work of the geneticist John Sanford from Cornell University.” Sociologist Fabrizio Fratus, The Third International Scientific Conference held in Istanbul, Turkey, in April 2019 was entitled “The Origin of Life and the Universe.” Scientists join to debunk evolution 21 MICRO LEADS TO MACRO EVOLUTION
Macroevolution refers to major evolutionary changes over Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. time, the origin of new types of organisms from previously Change happens within a group, producing slightly different existing, but different, ancestral types. This is not descendants. This is observable, testable, and repeatable. observable, not testable, and not repeatable. MICRO LEADS TO MACRO 22 EVOLUTION
Evolution envisions that 2.5 billion years ago living cell just sprang out of the primordial soup. The living cell kept evolving into more and more complex life organisms until today where the living cell produced the huge living varieties we see today discarding the Biogenesis & the pure word of God “In the beginning God created …etc.”. When Jeremiah prophesized 2:13 “For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.” the inspiration had them in mind definitely.
What was the first organism originally on Earth? - Quora MICRO LEADS TO MACRO 23 EVOLUTION
• Evolutionists claim that micro evolution leads to macro evolution, just give it millions of years. ? • The tools for this evolution is*: 1. Mutation: but we know almost all mutations are useless if not harmful, exact mutation has to happen same time in enough males and females who would breed to carry the change to next generation otherwise the mutation will be washed out in the gene pool. The chance of good mutation, though it means loss of information, is 1 to 1077. There hasn’t been enough time to generate the world’s observed genetic diversity even assuming vast eons, according to evolutionist J. B. S. Haldane. The accumulated bad mutations would render the gene pool waste much earlier than good traits may appear leading to organism distinction. * Ref: New Distributed Problem-solving Model for Population Adaptation by P. B. Gaskill & Randy Evolution at different scales: micro to macro J. Guliuzza; Acts & Facts April 2019. Scientists join to debunk evolution 24 MICRO LEADS TO MACRO EVOLUTION
2. Migration: The movement of individuals between populations. Leading to interbreeding between different kinds supposedly producing third kind but we know only members in the same X kind can breed together producing same kind ☺, so this one is mute too. 3. Genetic Drift: Fancy name for random changes in the gene frequencies of a population from generation to generation, due to errors. Can errors bring something good? 4. Natural Selection: But natural selection selects from what is available to start with, never adds new information to the DNA, if any it loses. 25 MICRO LEADS TO MACRO EVOLUTION
Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are "horizontal" in effect, not "vertical." Such changes might be accomplished by "natural selection," in which a trait within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by "artificial selection," such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Adaptation - Why You Should Believe in Creation ...And Not Evolution | David Rives 26
Please click on the picture to see the play button
Click: Adaptation - Why You Should Believe in Creation ...And Not Evolution | David Rives Is evolution good? David rives 27
Please click on the picture to see the play button Credit: David Rives Ministries Is Evolution Science...Or Religion? - David Rives 28
Please click on the picture to see the play button Credit: David Rives Ministries Click: Is Evolution Science...Or Religion? - David Rives 29
Micro to Macro evolution IN MILLIONS OF YEARS
TOMBSTONE #3 KEYSTONE #4 30 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS VERIFIED BY RADIOMETRIC AGING PROCESSES
NO ONE IS EXCEMPT OF BEING TAUGHT THAT DINOSAURS LIVED IN THE “CRETACEOUS” PERIOD OVER 70 MILLION YEARS AGO, EVEN KINDER GARDEN KIDS (THOSE ONES WITHOUT GEOLOGICAL COLUMN). DID THEY REALLY LIVE 70 MY YEARS AGO? WERE THERE MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO ANYWAY? THIS TEACHING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE WITHOUT MILLIONS OF YEARS NO EVOLUTIONIST WILL DARE TO CLAIM IT CAN HAPPEN. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE SUPPORTED BY RADIOMETRIC AGING PROCESS; HOWEVER THESE PROCESSES ARE BASED ON PRESUMPTIONS IN FAVORING MILLIONS OF YEARS, BESIDES, THE ASSUMPTIONS USED ARE UNVERIFIABLE. In nutshell radioactive an isotope, parent, is unstable. It changes gradually to more stable element, daughter, by emitting particles out of their nucleus. Time taken to change half the parent atoms to daughter atoms take different times for different isotopes and is called half time. By measuring the number of daughter atoms and compare it to the parent atoms in a sample the time taken since beginning can be calculated if the half time is known. The assumption upon which the calculations based are mainly: 1. The sample started with zero number of daughter atoms; all are parent atoms. 2. There was no leak of parent or daughter atoms out or into the sample. 3. The half time is constant all the time.
Assumptions for radiometric aging process Radiometric dating, radioactive dating or radioisotope dating 31 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS VERIFIED BY RADIOMETRIC AGING PROCESSES
These assumption cannot be verified, as a matter of fact there are quite many evidences point to the contrary such as :
1. Blood and soft tissues in fossils. FREDRICH HOYEL: IT IS MORE LIKELY 2. C14 in fossils and diamonds. THAT A TORNADO STORMING THROUGH A JUNK 3. Difference more than 1% in DNA between two creatures preclude YARD WILL common ancestor. PRODUCE A BOEING 747 THAN LIVING CELL 4. Helium remained in Zirconium crystals points to 5000 years age for SPRINGS OUT OF THE PRIMORDIAL the earth. SOUP. EVOLUTION IS DOA (DEAD ON 5. Etc. ARRIVAL) There are over differe100 aging processes 90% of them point to young earth. See the tables on the following 4 slides. 101 evidences for a young age of the Earth and the universe C14 TESTING RESULTS FOR SOME FOSSILS
Results of C-14 tests on dinosaur bones provided by the Paleochronology Group . https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/humans-walk-earth-dinosaurs-triceratops-horn-dated-33500-020159 33 BLOOD & SOFT TISSUES IN FOSSILS 34 BLOOD & SOFT TISSUES IN FOSSILS 35 RADIOMETRIC DATING IS WRONG
Radiometric Dating: Problems with the Assumptions 36 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS BUSTED
THE Dinosaur Shocker NO, IT WAS NOT ITS FEARCE TEATH OR SCARY SKULL THAT SHOCKED MARY SCHWEITZER AND ALL THE EVOLUTIONISTS, IT WAS ITS 68 MY OLD PEACEFUL LOOKING BLOOD DROPS AND FRAGMENT OF SOFT TISSUE WHICH SHOCKED THE WHOLE EVOLUTION COMMUNITY IN OCTOBER 2005, THAT IS UNTIL THEY CLIVERLY IN 2013 BRUSHED IT AWAY, AS USUAL, BY GROUND BREAKING DISCOVERY OF IRON IN THE BLOOD. YES, THIS SPECIFIC TEREX BLOOD, UNLIKE ALL LIVING ORGANISMS, CONTAINS IRON WHICH PRESERVED IT! AND THEY CALL THIS SCIENCE. Didn't brush his teeth! 37 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE 38 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE BUSTED
THIS IS THE SPONTANEOUS UN- ULTERATED REACION OF MARY SCHWEITZER WHO DISCOVERED THE BLOOD AND SOFT TISSUE 39 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE BUSTED
After 68 million years in the ground, a Tyrannosaurus rex found in Montana was dug up, its leg bone was broken in pieces, and fragments were dissolved in acid in Schweitzer’s laboratory at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. “Cool beans,” she says, looking at the image on the screen*. *REF: Dinosaur Shocker 40 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE BUSTED
GOOD QUESTION! 41 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE BUSTED ANOTHER GOOD QUESTION! COULD IT BE BECAUSE IT IS JUST COUPLE THOUSAND YEARS ONLY? OR AS USUAL? 42 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE BUSTED THE MILLIONS OF YEARS 43 TALE BUSTED 44
The Millions of years verified by radiometric aging processes
TOMBSTONE #4 KEYSTONE #5 45 GEOLOGIC COLUMN SHOWS EARTH’S HISTORY
Created in early 19th Century and based on the assumption that: • The deeper a fossil is found the older is the creature. • The fossils of a layer are for creatures evolved from the lower fossils’ creatures. • A time scale was postulated before any radiometric aging process was discovered, phenomenon like magnetic time scale, buildup of salt in the oceans, earth cooling, ..etc. • Realistically these layers of the geological column are nothing, but the sedimentary layers caused by the world wide Noah flood. The fossils are the result of hydraulic sorting and the progressive flooding of the different earth levels whereas each layer follows closely the different areas where the different creatures used to live, like shell fish close to the bottom of the oceans while dinosaurs are at higher level because they could at the beginning run away from the rising flood until there was no more place available to run to. • See also “Grand canyon lie” at the beginning of this presentation. • The total geological column does not exist in any place, generally few different layers may be found in different places. 100 million 46 years old? THE MILLIONS 200 million OF YEARS years old? TALE DISCONTINUED
300 million The fossils in the geological column do not represent successive epochs, years old? they are the result of hydraulic sorting during Noah flood and reflects the rising of the water. At the bottom there is the sea creatures 400 million that live down deep under water and years old? at the top land animals and birds. 100 million years old? 47
200 million years old? THE MILLIONS 300 million years old? OF YEARS TALE 400 million years old? BUSTED
Darwin did not like the round numbers so he said the Wealden deposits in England were 306,662,400 years old? Noah to Abram the Turbulent Years, by Erich von Fange p. 116 48 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS TALE BUSTED
THE BLOOD AND SOFT TISSUE OF THE TYRANNOSAURUS REX ARE NOT THE ONLY YOUNG FOSSILS, THERE ARE HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF MY’S-AGED YOUNG FOSSILS. WE WILL SAMPLE SOME OF THEM ON THE NEXT FEW SLIDES.
Fossil human hands found in “cretaceous” rock near a large Ichthyosaurus (marine dinosaur) by Dr. Jamie Gutierrez in South America. Info, the fossil and more pictures at The 130-Million-Year-Old Human Fossil Heist 49
Geological column shows earth’s history
TOMBSTONE #5 KEYSTONE #6 POLYSTRATE TREE FOSSILS ARE BURIED IN 50 MILLIONS OF YEARS LAYERS
Bob Jones Earth Science p. 306 51 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS
TALE POLYSTRATE FOSSILS
Standing, petrified trees found in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA See Impact #268 The Yellowstone Petrified Forests by John Morris Ph.D.
A Classic Polystrate Fossil 52 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS
TALE POLYSTRATE FOSSILS THE MILLIONS OF YEARS 53
TALE POLYSTRATE FOSSILS
There is another f explanation: The trees were buried upright during a global flood. 54 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS
TALE POLYSTRATE FOSSILS
• Spirit Lake is at the foot of St. Helen Mountain. It was covered by uprooted trees from the • Scientists estimate woods around it as result of Mt. St. Helen eruption in 1982. there are 20,000 trees • Like the polystrate trees, these trees have in the bottom of Spirit neither roots nor branches, just the trunks. Lake. • They don’t have bark either, all the bark was • Many of them are stripped due to pumping to each other. buried upright and • The bark formed 30 feet thick beet layer on some are 15 feet the bottom of the lake. With time these trees will be polystrate trees. deep in sediments. • Dr. Stephen Austin suggested that such bark • They seem to settle layer when covered by sediment like during out species giving the Noah flood would under pressure, moisture, and heat be converted into coal or oil appearance of a depending on the different conditions. complete forest. Polystrate Fossils - Creation Evidence
55
M O V I E
T I M E
Please click on the picture to see the play button
Credit: Creation Science Evangelism (CSE): Click: Polystrate Fossils - Creation Evidence Polystrate Fossils -- evidence against millions of years
56
M O V I E
T I M E
Please click on the picture to see the play button
Credit: CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (Cmi), 57
Polystrate tree fossils are formed in millions of years layers
TOMBSTONE #6 KEYSTONE #7 58 FOSSILS TAKE MILLIONS OF YEARS TO FORM
Fossilization/petrification does not need millions of years, just the proper minerals and as little time as shown by these recent day samples. See next couple slide. 59 FOSSILS ARE NOT OLD, THEY FIT NOAH FLOOD
• The famous Petrifying Well at Mother Shipton's Cave, Knaresborough, North Yorkshire. • If an object is placed into such a well and left there for a period of weeks or months the object acquires a stony exterior. • It is an entirely natural phenomenon and due to a process of evaporation and deposition in waters with an unusually high mineral content. • During Noah flood dead animals got buried quickly with wet sediments. Under sediment pressure and minerals the corpses were petrified in many cases before the bacteria degenerated the soft tissues.
The famous Petrifying Well at Mother Shipton's Cave, Knaresborough, North Yorkshire
12/30/2019 60 HOW TO BE FOSSILIZED
Dinosaur skin rapid fossilization – YouTube Uniformitarian’s misleading fossilization formation. The proper formation of fossils: Click the link or the box. V t i i d m e e o
Textbook uniformitarian account. The fish Would be devoured by scavengers before It is covered by sediments UNLESS the sediments covered it Please click the white screen above immediately as during Noah flood. 12/30/2019 61 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS
TALE BUSTED
Fast Fossils The Limestone Cowboy hat 62 THE MILLIONS OF YEARS
TALE BUSTED
Who Cut the Wood?
Fossil flour bags Creation evidence in the 21st century
63 V I D E O
T I M E Credit: Creation Evidence Museum of Texas (CEMot), Click: Creation evidence in the 21st century Creation evidence in the 21st century
64 V I D E O
T I M E 65
Fossils take Millions of years to form
TOMBSTONE #7 66 WHAT IS EVOLUTION ANYWAY? 67 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? QUICK REVIEW-CONTINUED 68 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? QUICK REVIEW-CONTINUED 69 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? QUICK REVIEW-CONTINUED
1790 1830 70 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? QUICK REVIEW-CONTINUED
• During the revolution age 1790-1870 everyone wanted to get rid of all authorities including God • 1795 James Hutton’s book made people doubt the Genesis • 1830 Charles Lyell book made people doubt the flood • 1895 Charles Darwin book made people doubt God • The next 50 years of godless thinking led to humanism, racism, communism, Nazism, and plans for a New World Order. • Leading to the bloodiest century in 6000 years: twentieth century • Following the world wars the godless thinking clothed in liberalism and under the slogan of progress it became stylish to rewrite/reshape all aspects of science and literature in “evolution” precepts. And all trickled down to education. 71 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? CONTINUED
“It is a truly wonderful fact that all • The idea of evolution goes back to ancient Egyptians and Greeks but had never came to prominence animals and all plants throughout all • In the 17th century Darwin under strong influence from time and space should be related to each Lyell’s book he rebirthed the idea just because he other.” observed 14 varieties of Finches in Galapagos islands, did he overlook the different dog shapes and sizes in England? Charles Darwin Origin of Species p. 170 • A stupid observation and baseless conclusion still misleads millions of highly educated scientists in age we travel between the planets and decipher dinosaur genomes! 72 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? CONTINUED
• The first chapter of the Holly Bible is dedicated to stress that all living organisms have off-springs each after his own kind however an unemployed preacher breaches this clear teaching and derails the whole humanity into abyss of lies. • “after his kind” Is the timeless and precise term for what Francis Crick discovered in 1951-1953; i.e. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid). • The irony Darwin was buried in the West Minister abbey: “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” ! Psalm 11:3 73 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? CONTINUED
1. Cosmic Evolution: The origin of Time, Space, and Matter, i.e., the Big Bang. 2. Chemical Evolution: i. Big bang supposedly produced Hydrogen and some Helium ii. how did we get the 92 elements formed plus the synthetic ones#? iii. How the chemicals evolved?
i.e. Religion i.e. 3. Steller and planetary evolution: Origin of stars and planets. Untestable/Unverifiable i. No one has ever seen a star or planet forms, we see stars dying. ii. Statistically a star dies every 26 years, in 20 billion years we should see millions of did stars, how come we see few hundreds only (perfect for 6000 years universe ☺)? #)Do not appear in nature, AN=95-118 74 WHAT IS EVOLUTION? CONTINUED
4. Organic evolution: Origin of life. i. How did life come from none living material? Have never seen it. 5. Macro evolution: Changing from one kind of animals to another kind.
i.e.Religion i. Never seen dog producing cat or mice
Untestable/Unverifiable ii. Even if it takes millions of years why you’ve never seen transitional fossils? 6. Micro-evolution: Variations within kinds. i. Rational creationists believe in this, it is producing different species from one
kind, like different species of dogs or horses. It should be called variations in Verifiable Testable& stead of micro evolution because evolutionists try to have free ride on it for the other none scientific kinds. WHAT IS EVOLUTION? CONTINUED 75
5
Prentice Hall Earth “Living things”- This #5, what happened to the first 4 stages of Science 1999 p. 627 evolution? KEYSTONE #8 76 MUTATION LEADS TO EVOLUTION
Genetic mutations produce new genetic information, but do these lead to macroevolution? No truly useful mutations have ever been observed. The one most cited is the disease sickle- cell anemia (SSA), which provides an enhanced resistance to malaria. It was found that the faulty gene that causes the fatal SSA causes certain level of “hemoglobin” which prevents the disease taking hold after the person that has been infected*. Like feetless persons don’t get athletes foot. *Ref: Sickle cell disease 77 MUTATION MAKES LEADS TO EVOLUTION
Disorder Mutation Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome D 22q Angelman syndrome DCP 15 Highest 21 common mutations disorders* Canavan disease 17p Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease P – Point mutation, or any insertion/deletion entirely inside one gene. Color blindness P X Cri du chat D 5 D – Deletion of a gene or genes. Cystic fibrosis P 7q Down syndrome C 21 C – Whole chromosome extra, missing, or both (see Chromosome abnormality). Duchenne muscular dystrophy D Xp Familial Hypercholesterolemia P Haemochromatosis P 6 T – Trinucleotide repeat disorders: gene is extended in length. Haemophilia P X Klinefelter syndrome C X Neurofibromatosis 17q/22q/? Phenylketonuria P 12q *Ref: Are all mutations harmful? Polycystic kidney disease P 16 (PKD1) or 4 (PKD2) Prader–Willi syndrome DC 15 Sickle-cell disease P 11p Spinal muscular atrophy DP 5q Tay–Sachs disease P 15 Turner syndrome C X
Genetic Disorders The abbreviated full list is 233 mutations long. MUTATION LEADS TO EVOLUTION 78
After searching the internet for hours to find beneficiary mutation I found 4 in the same musical keynote of the SSA, as a matter of fact the SSA is one of them. Beneficial mutation 1. #1: Apolipoprotein AI-Milano: Apo-AI is one of the HDLs, already known to be beneficial because they remove cholesterol from artery walls 2. Beneficial mutation #2: Increased bone density: One of the genes that governs bone density in human beings is called low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5, or LRP5 for stronger and 4. Beneficial mutation #4: Tetrachromatic vision, this one should be counted denser than average. as straight harmful. It is concerning 2 genes in the X chromosome which are 3. Beneficial mutation #3: Malaria resistance (SSA): responsible to see the green bzw the green colors. Now, the smart logic is stating that men are more likely see reddish or greenish than women because the women have 2 X chromosomes and thus have a backup. This is so more Chloroquine Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Parasites Conferred by pfcrt Mutations stupid than the SSA mutation, was the male/female creation a result of mutation? 79 MUTATION LEADS TO EVOLUTION 80 MUTATION LEADS TO EVOLUTION
This is what mutation gives! 81 MUTATION LEADS TO EVOLUTION
This is what mutation gives! 82 MUTATION MAKES LEADS TO EVOLUTION
two headed animals This is what mutation gives! 83 MUTATION LEADS TO EVOLUTION
From the letters in the word Christmas you can get: has, mat, Sam, Christ, ram, sat, hit, etc.
but you cannot get: Xerox, Zebra or Queen! KEYSTONE #9 84 NATURAL SELECTION LEADS TO EVOLUTION
Natural Selection: The nature is not living thing much less thinking or selecting anything. Naturally the individuals whose capabilities and traits better fit the environment will have better chances to survive and reproduce. On the other end of the scale the individuals with poor fit of their capabilities and traits will not thrive or reproduce as much and slowly either migrate to more convenient environment or get extinct. In other words, the abstract “Natural Selection” weeds out the week and feeble individual, it does not explain how good individuals were “evolved”. Indeed, it is another characteristic of falling world resulted Prentice Hall Focus on Life Science 2001, p. 141 from Adam’s sin. 85 NATURAL SELECTION LEADS TO EVOLUTION 86 NATURAL SELECTION LEADS TO EVOLUTION 87 MILLIONS OF YEARS WON’T HELP EITHER
• Dr. Richard Lenski Professor of Microbial Ecology Michigan State University has been growing E. coli continuously since 1988; over 46,000 generations equivalent to millions of years of evolution. • The E. coli stayed E. coli though it became more fit to live in the lab however it lost the genes of breaking down certain sugars they were not given to it, it lost mobility genes because food is abundant, it lost certain regulatory control. They got fat and lazy, they can’t survive in the nature like other E. coli • Evolutionists think erroneously this experiment proved their point of evolution because the bacteria gained new traits, which is wrong.
Origins: Mutations: Evolution’s Disappointment 9+ Debunking Evolution Clip: Mutations Are Bad 88
1:30 / 2:25
Debunking Evolution Clip: Mutations Are Bad
Please click on the picture to see the play button Debunking Evolution Clip: Mutations Are Bad 89
Mutation leads to evolution
TOMBSTONE #8 KEYSTONE #10 90 SURVIVAL FOR THE Factory to produce FITTEST cars with a quality control section.
Quality control will produce reliable cars, never airplanes. 91 SURVIVAL FOR THE
FITTEST CONTINUED
Survival of the fittest produce evolution. This is incorrect, It is a fact of life in a world that has been tainted with death and bloodshed, but only since Adam rebelled against his Maker. It does not produce any new genetic information; it just weeds out feeble individuals who don’t have what it takes to survive and reproduce due to bad mutations, sickness, improper genes and the like. 'Survival of the Fittest' is not Evolution 92 SURVIVAL FOR THE
FITTEST CONTINUED
Another circular reasoning used often by evolutionists: Q. Why did it survive? A. Because it is the fittest. Q. How do you know it is the fittest? A. Because it survived. 93
Natural Selection leads to evolution
TOMBSTONE #9 94 SURVIVAL FOR THE
FITTEST CONTINUED “Fruit flies refuse to become anything but fruit flies under any circumstances yet devised.”
Lane Lester, Ph.D. in genetics, The Natural Limits to Biological Change, 1989, p.89. 95 SURVIVAL FOR THE
FITTEST CONTINUED
Conclusions from Fruit Fly Experiment 1. All mutations observed produced flies that were inferior to the original fly. Good observation! 2. Fruit flies must have evolved as far as they can go. Bad Conclusion 96 SURVIVAL FOR THE
FITTEST CONTINUED
Just a thought: The DNA errors are corrected by enzymes; the success rate is 99%. For those evolutionists and theistic evolutionists: If mutations, which are the results of errors, are the mechanism for evolution, does the nature/God fight it-/Himself? DNA damage (= mutation) repair 97
M O V I E
T I M E
Credit: TED-Ed: Lessons Worth Sharing 98 DNA damage (= mutation) repair
M O V I E
T I M E
Click: What happens when your DNA is damaged? - Monica Menesini 99
Survival of the fittest produces evolution
TOMBSTONE #10 100 KEYSTONE #11 THE PEPPERED MOTH MYTH*
Survival for the fittest continued In the early 1950s, British physician and amateur moth- collector Bernard Kettlewell released light and dark peppered moths onto nearby tree trunks and watched as birds ate the less camouflaged ones. He then released moths that had been marked on the underside with a tiny spot of paint. When he later recaptured some, the proportion of moths matching the color of nearby tree trunks was significantly higher than in the batch he had released, consistent with the camouflage-predation theory. Kettlewell called this "Darwin's missing evidence," and it quickly became standard fare in biology textbooks. It is obvious the tally was on the original moth generation and not its offspring to claim any evolution. *Ref: http://www.discovery.org/a/1263 THE PEPPERED MOTH 101 MYTH
The peppered moth is a great proof of design! God wants to make sure the moth population survives no matter what happens to the environment. On dark tree park, dark moth will be better camouflaged and thus survive to reproduce and vice versa. God put both colors in the moth genes to help some will survive in all circumstances. That is planning by ingenious designer. Ford and GM put heaters and an air conditioners in most of their cars. The moth is not proof of evolution. “Melanism: Evolution in Action” by Michael E. Majerus, Oxford University Press, 1998 102 WRONG CONCLUSION
• The peppered moth experiment is a perfect example of good trial to test a theory. • It is unfortunately a perfect example of prejudiced conclusion. • In other words, good observation is useless if the conclusion was not made already before the est. 103 WRONG CONCLUSION 104
The Peppered Moth Myth
TOMBSTONE #11 105 KEYSTONE #12 HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES
• Evolutionists claim that: ➢Homologous structures, ➢Vestigial structures,
➢Molecules
handled handled in the next lies prove evolution. be Will • We will see that these are pointing to a supreme genius designer & creator. HOMOLOGOUS 106 STRUCTURES PROVES COMMON ANCESTOR
• Structures that appear homologous often develop under the control of genes that are not homologous. • Biologist Michael Land2 sounds like a creationist when he mentions in passing that the vertebrate eye “shares design features but not evolution” with the eye of the cephalopod mollusks such as the octopus. • Certain shrimp-like animals that live in deep ocean darkness, he says, have compound eyes with lenses all arranged to focus light at a common point (rather than forming multiple images, as most compound eyes do). But, he continues, some members of the group have “lens cylinders” that smoothly bend the incoming light (because of smoothly varied refractive indices), whereas others have square facets with a “mirror system”
Ref: AiG https://answersingenesis.org/biology/homology-comparative-similarities/ 107 HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES IS DESIGN
M According to this mosaic concept, also called modular or o matrix, God used a basic plan in making living creatures, v i somewhat similar to the plan He used in making different non-living substances. All the countless chemical e substances in the universe are made from different combinations and proportions of only about a hundred t i different elements, usually displayed in a “chemistry mosaic” called the periodic table. Each kind of chemical m compound can be represented by a formula expressing the e number, kind, and arrangement of elements within it.
Can you explain homology (repeated evolution)?
1.4 Comparative Similarities: Homology; by Dr. Gary Parker on February 13, 2016 Credit: Reasons to Believe 108 HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES IS DESIGN
Movie Perhaps God used genes as “elements” in making the various kinds of life, so that conceivably time each different kind of life could be represented by a “formula” representing the number, kind, and arrangement of different genes in its chromosomes. Such formulas would, of course, be much larger and much more complex than those for the most complicated chemical substances. Nevertheless, the mosaic concept does suggest that all the incredible variety and diversity of life forms we see about us may be constructed using only the information in a few thousand DNA segments, compared to about 100 chemical elements. Even more exciting, creationists might be able to use a mosaic pattern (or mathematical matrix) to predict the existence of unknown organisms and their features, like Mendeleev used his periodic table to predict the existence and 50 Years of Scientific Challenges to Evolution: properties of elements before their discovery. Remembering The Wistar Symposium
Credit: Discovery Science 1.4 Comparative Similarities: Homology; by Dr. Gary Parker on February 13, 2016 HOMOLOGOUS 109 STRUCTURES IS DESIGN
God uses the genes as building material to craft His living creatures as uses the Moreover, if the creatures with these homologous structures have the same ancestor they elements (of Mendeleev table) to build the different chemicals. And because all should formed of the same gene segment sequences in the different creatures. As it seen in the living creatures live and interact together in the same circumstance, they this example in the picture they are not. This is example of 6 different vertebrates allegedly have to be compatible with each other’s otherwise how can our enzymes digest have common ancestor. The front legs and the rear legs come from entirely different group vegetables or animal products. of segments from species to species still have similar features.
Ref: A Serious Problem for Homology 110 HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES IS DESIGN
• The eye of a human and the octopus's eye are remarkably similar, each containing a lens, iris, retina, an optic nerve, and muscles for rotating the eye and controlling the iris. • Yet these similarities cannot be explained by common descent. • Evolutionists explain these similarities as due to convergent evolution. • But that is an assumption, not an explanation.
ANALOGY AND HOMOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE ANATOMY Homological structures
111 Homological structures
112
Click:: Debunking Evolution - Homological Structures 113 HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES IS DESIGN
• The real focus of Land’s article, however, is “divergence,” the occurrence of quite distinct structures in plants and animals that otherwise are supposed to be close evolutionary relatives. • Comparing the mirrors with the lens cylinder system, Land says, “Both are successful and very sophisticated image-forming devices, but I cannot imagine an intermediate form [or common ancestral type] that would work at all.”
Ref: AiG : 1.4 Comparative Similarities: Homology 114 HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES IS DESIGN
• The kind of design in these eyes, he says, seems impossible to In plain English explain as a result of evolutionary relationship. • the shrimp-like animals with different systems should not be classified as evolutionary relatives, even though they are Homologous structures point to a common otherwise quite similar. ingenious designer/creator. • “trying not to come to the conclusion that these eyes had been A good designer changes his technique only put there by God to confuse scientists. when it is necessary to serve the purpose. • these eyes were put there by God to inform scientists. 1.4 Comparative Similarities: Homology Ref: AiG: HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES IS DESIGN 115 116
Homologous Structures Proves Common descendent
TOMBSTONE #12 KEYSTONE #13 117 VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES PROVES EVOLUTION • vestigial structures 118
Please use control + left-mouse click on the link below • vestigial structures 119
Click: Debunking Evolution - Vestigial Structures Please use control + left-mouse click on the link below 120 VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES CONTINUED 121 VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES CONTINUED
Appendix may have important function, new research suggests P.31 122
VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES CONTINUED Glenco Biology APPENDIX 1994 GLENCO BIOL Appendix may have important function, new research suggests p. 311 1994 P 311 123 VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES CONTINUED
Promiscuous Whales Make Good Use of Their Pelvises VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES 124
Holt Biology 1994 p. 182
Promiscuous Whales Make Good Use of Their Pelvises 125 VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES CONTINUED
Coccyx VESTIGIAL STRUCTURES 126
PREHENSILE TAIL (DRAWING) Coccyx 127
Vestigial structures proves evolution
TOMBSTONE #13 KEYSTONE #14
BIOGENETICS 128
“Embryologist Professor” BIOGENETIC CONTINUED Haeckel’s false claims
Facts
129 biogenetic
Haeckel’s fake drawings convinced the Germans the evolution is true therefore one of the races must have evolved more than the others resulting in two devastating world wars. More importantly in stead of being “.., in the image of God created He him; ..” Genesis 1:27 we became animal descendants opening flood gates of abortion, divorce, homosexuality, same sex marriage, euthanasia, ..etc. And the list goes on because it threw a cloud of doubt on the Genesis creation record which slowly creeped to the rest of the Bible.
130 131
BIOGENETIC CONTINUED 132
BIOGENETIC CONTINUED 133 BIOGENETIC
Asking About Life Tobin and Dusheck 1998 p. 381 134
BIOGENETIC CONTINUED 135
BIOGENETIC CONTINUED 136
BIOGENETIC CONTINUED
Embryonic fraud lives on BIOGENETIC DISCONTINUED 137
“Embryologist Professor”
INTENTIONALLY FALSIFIED THE DEAWINGS TO MAKE THEM SIMILAR 138
BIOGENETIC CONTINUED
“The evolutionary idea that [Sick-mind] Freud relied on most heavily in the manuscript is the maxim that ‘ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny,’ that is, that the development of the individual recapitulates the evolution of the entire species.” Lost Paper Shows Freud’s Effort to Link Analysis and Evolution, New York Times, Feb. 10, 1987, p. c4 139 BAD EDUCATION OUTCOME SAMPLES
(S)HE IS A HUMAN CONCEPTION TO DECEASE 140
Biogenetics proves evolution
TOMBSTONE #14 BAD EDUCATION OUTCOME SAMPLES 141
(S)HE IS A HUMAN CONCEPTION TO DECEASE 142 BAD EDUCATION OUTCOME SAMPLES
“ And the angel of As soon as the the LORD said unto sound of your her, Behold, thou art greeting reached my ears, the fetus with fetus child and baby in my womb shalt bear a son,” leaped for joy.
Genesis 16:11 Luke 1:41-44
(S)HE IS A HUMAN CONCEPTION TO DECEASE 143 BAD EDUCATION OUTCOME SAMPLES
Why is this lie kept in textbooks? It is the only way to “scientifically” justify abortion!
Nuremburg files web site has names of doctors who do abortions. Mr. Lokey of Opp, AL has an anti-abortion billboard. Judge Frank Bell sentenced Paul Hill to death. Regina Dinwidi?, KS, MO was a nurse who got converted and protests now.
(S)HE IS A HUMAN CONCEPTION TO DECEASE
A Gibo's Tale: A little "hand of hope"... an amazing story 144 BAD EDUCATION OUTCOME SAMPLES
Not a baby at 7 months?
(S)HE IS A HUMAN CONCEPTION Biology A Journey Into Life Arms and Camp 1991 p. TO DECEASE 557 CONTINUE 145 WHAT IS BEHIND BAD EDUCATION?
“I suppose the reason why we leapt at the Origin of Species was that the idea of God interfered with our sexual morés” Sir Julian Huxley - Head of UNESCO - One of the World’s leading evolutionists was asked in a Television Interview why did the scientific community jump at Darwin’s ideas? DISOBEYING THE CREATOR DOESN’T GO UNNOTICED!146
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Romans 1:28 DISOBEYING THE CREATOR DOESN’T GO UNNOTICED!147
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: II Thes. 2:11 148 PRE-CAMBRIAN HUMANS?
Pre-Cambrian human’s sandals print fossil stepping on a triplite 149
PRE-CAMBRIAN HUMANS? CONTINUED
Pre-Cambrian human’s cup 150
PRE-CAMBRIAN HUMANS? CONTINUED
Pre-Cambrian human’s hummer, very high metallurgical iron 151
evolution
Principal TOMBSTONE 152
Graveyard of the century Evolution “key-stones” tomb-stones 153 How KEY-STONES “evolved” to TOMB-STONES (summery): 1. Grand Canyon was formed slowly by Colorado River: This is incorrect, The canyon is a spillway of huge lake formed by Noah flood. 2. From sea to land IN MILLIONS OF YEARS: This is incorrect, the Coelacanth and many other creatures are indistinguishable from millions years old fossils. 3. Micro to Macro evolution IN MILLIONS OF YEARS: This is incorrect, Living fossils prove hundreds of million years changed no kinds. 4. The Millions of years verified by radiometric aging processes: This is incorrect, the radiometric dating is based on unverifiable assumptions and its parameters are provisioned to yield very large ages. Evolution “key-stones” tomb-stones 154
5. Geologic column shows earth’s history: This is incorrect, this column was fabricated based on observations in different geological layers primarily of the grand canyon. These are sedimentary layers and the fossils are hydraulically sorted all during and right after the worldwide Noah flood which too about one year. 6. Polystrate tree fossils are buried in millions of years layers: This is incorrect, no dead tree would stay upright for even hundreds of years without rotting and falling down. They were buried and fossilized with the surroundings by the sedimentation from worldwide Noah food which took about a year. Similar situation is in progress at St. Helen mountain. Evolution “key-stones” tomb-stones 155
7. Fossils take Millions of years to form: This is incorrect, all what is needed is mineral rich water and as little as few weeks' time. In the labs it can take few hours only. 8. Mutation leads to evolution: This is incorrect, mutation reduces information by introducing errors to the DNA. Evolution needs new information to improve on the species and change it to a better one. Bad mutations are 1077 times more than beneficiary ones, they render the DNA corrupt and extinct much faster than a good one comes. 9. Natural Selection leads to evolution: This is incorrect, it just weeds out bad individuals. Evolution “key-stones” tomb-stones 156 10. Survival of the fittest produce evolution: This is incorrect, just another weed killer. 11. Homologous structures proves common ancestor: This is incorrect, it points to common designer rather than common ancestor. 12. The Peppered Moth Myth: This is incorrect, it claims that the light- colored moth increased due to evolution which is forgery: (A) The light- colored became inconspicuous to the birds when the trees became light- colored too and thus survived better than the dark-colored. (B) The count was anyway on the first generation (with paint sign on them) and not descendants and thus the change cannot be credited to evolution. Evolution “key-stones” tomb-stones 13. Vestigial structures proves evolution: This is incorrect, there are no vestigial structures anyway. Evolutionists used to call any structures which we did not understand its function yet to be vestigial, i.e., useless and was inherited from previous ancestors. 180 human body parts were classified as such; e.g., appendix we know now it important part of immune system so are the tonsils, tail bone we know now it ackers 9 important mussels. Also in male whales certain bones crucial for mating were though disappearing hip bones inherited from land animals. 158 Evolution “key-stones” tombstones
14. Homologous structures proves common ancestor: This is incorrect, it proved common designer. They develop from different gene segment sequences in the diff species. Also, more than often the homologous structures are in species which are not related to each other like the human and the octopus' eyes. 15. Evolution is fact: This is definitely incorrect, all the major claimed evolution evidences are shown to be wrong and prejudice. 159 CONCLUSION
• If lies are not confronted right from the beginning they will flourish • Evolution (Darwin 1859) goes hand-in-hand with geological column (Charles Lyell 1830) which was made up by amateur who hated the Bible and before any dating process was invented • Uniformitarianism gave birth to old universe; e.g., Grand Canyon, evolution, ..etc. • The entrance of Colorado River today is more than 4,000 feet lower than the highest level of the canyon • Grand Canyon is a spillway of a breach in a levy of a huge lake covering several states lift by the flood, barbed canyons proves this too • The breech is caused by the Kaibab uplift • The Grand Canyon layers are hydraulic precipitation during the flood 160
CONCLUSION CONTINUED
• The Kaibab uplift caused bending of the layers • The layers are not broken at the bend meaning they were soft and therefore all of the layers are precipitated is short time and not separated by millions of years • The layers are stacked like pancake, no any marks of erosion or separation which must happen if they are separated by millions of years • In spite of all of these definite conditions the Grand Canyon is taught in the schools as made by little water during millions of years while it is clear made by lot od water in very short time could be weeks if not days • Example of this Grand Canyon happened in our life time on a smaller scale 1:40 when mount St. Hellen erupted in 1982 • Origin of Species came right after the geological/Uniformitarianism commotion in 1859 161
CONCLUSION CONTINUED
• This started the theory of evolution which received wide acceptance because it was the direct blow which replaced God by time and chance • Although it is difficult to imagine wide acceptance for lies but we have many examples in the recent past like Hitler, Mousseline, and Saline who themselves were strong believers and fans of evolution • Even in our life time we still remember Jim Jones, People’s Temple Guyana November 18, 1978 when 913 people drank willingly poisoned cool-aid • Uniformitarianism came at the Hight of “Age of Revolution and Anti-Monarchy) when Europe was looking to get rid of all monarch and government authorities including God’s authority • It started by James Hutton’s book “Theory of the Earth” in 1795 162
CONCLUSION CONTINUED
• Uniformitarianism established its routes and kingdom by “Principles of Geology” by Charles Lyell in 1830, a lawyer without formal geology education and way before any dating process was invented he assigned millions of year ages for different earth layers which stayed till today standards of Geology 163 QUIZ
1. What caused the Uniformitarianism and evolution flourished? 2. Why old universe and evolution go hand-in-hand with Uniformitarianism? 3. Give several proofs that the Grand Canyon is a spill way of a breach of the levy of huge lake caused by the flood. 4. Give example happened in our lifetime for the Grand Canyon. 5. Give examples in our lifetime for wide-spread acceptance for lies. 6. Give examples in recent history for wide-spread acceptance for lies.