DOCSLIB.ORG

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Case: 20-1402 Document: 1-1 Filed: 03/10/2020 Pages: 137 (1 of 141) No. 20-____ In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit IN RE KENNY K. WANG, KATHLEEN WANG, AND KENNY W. WANG, Petitioners. On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 19-CV-2394, Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr., District Judge PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Lewis S. Kahn Daniel L. Geyser KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC GEYSER P.C. 1100 Poydras St., Ste. 3200 One Energy Square New Orleans, LA 70163 4925 Greenville Ave., Ste. 200 Tel.: (504) 455-1400 Dallas, TX 75206 [email protected] Tel.: (214) 800-2660 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Appellate Counsel for Petitioners Marvin A. Miller Andrew Szot MILLER LAW LLC 115 S. LaSalle St., Ste. 2910 Chicago, IL 60603 Tel.: (312) 332-3400 [email protected] [email protected] Local Counsel for Petitioners [Oral Argument Requested] Case: 20-1402 Document: 1-1 Filed: 03/10/2020 Pages: 137 (2 of 141) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Relief sought ............................................................................................................. 4 Issue presented ........................................................................................................ 4 Statement .................................................................................................................. 4 Reasons why the writ should issue ........................................................................ 8 I. Mandamus is appropriate to correct the misreading and misapplication of the PSLRA’s scheme for appointing lead plaintiffs ................................................................................................ 8 II. The district court’s lead-plaintiff analysis violated the PSLRA’s statutory scheme .............................................................. 10 A. Per the PSLRA’s plain text and structure, a lead plaintiff cannot be disqualified based on “questions” or “concerns” alone—the PSLRA requires actual “proof” that a party “will not” adequately represent the class .................................................................................... 10 B. The court applied the wrong standard in assessing prima facie “adequacy” under the PSLRA and Rule 23 ...................................................................................... 15 1. The court wrongly required petitioners to “prove” they satisfied Rule 23, whereas stage one requires only a “prima facie” showing .............. 16 2. The court wrongly raised the adequacy threshold above and beyond Rule 23’s traditional requirements ............................................ 19 3. The court erred by refusing to provide any opportunity to satisfy its (improper) heightened standard .................................................... 22 i Case: 20-1402 Document: 1-1 Filed: 03/10/2020 Pages: 137 (3 of 141) TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page C. The court’s contrary rationale lacks merit .......................... 25 1. The court failed to identify any relevant authority to support its misreading and misapplication of the PSLRA .................................... 25 2. The court’s factual findings lacked merit—and were premised on baseless suppositions refuted by actual evidence ........................................... 27 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 37 ii Case: 20-1402 Document: 1-1 Filed: 03/10/2020 Pages: 137 (4 of 141) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases: Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) ...................................... 20 Beaton v. SpeedyPC Software, 907 F.3d 1018 (7th Cir. 2018) .......................... 33 Berger v. Compaq Computer Corp., 257 F.3d 475 (5th Cir. 2001) ................... 22 Berger v. Compaq Computer Corp., 279 F.3d 313 (5th Cir. 2002) ................... 26 Bhojwani v. Pistiolis, No. 06-13761, 2007 WL 9228588 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2007) ...................................................................................................... 34 Bieter Co., In re, 16 F.3d 929 (8th Cir. 1994) ........................................................ 9 Brady v. Top Ships Inc., 324 F. Supp. 3d 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) ........................ 16 Camp v. Qualcomm Inc., No. 18-1208, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130746 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2019) ......................................................................... 27 Cavanaugh, In re, 306 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 2002) ........................................ passim Cendant Corp. Litig., In re, 264 F.3d 201 (3d Cir. 2001) ......................... passim Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367 (2004) ................................... 8, 10 City of Sterling Heights Gen. Emps.’ Retirement Sys. v. Hospira, Inc., No. 11-8332, 2012 WL 1339678 (N.D. Ill. 2012) ..................................... 20 Cohen, In re, 586 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2009) ............................................................ 9 Conseco, Inc. Sec. Litig., In re, 120 F. Supp. 2d 729 (S.D. Ind. 2000) ............. 26 Dewey v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, 681 F.3d 170 (3d Cir. 2012) ........... 20 DVI Inc. Sec. Litig., In re, 249 F.R.D. 196 (E.D. Pa. 2008) .............................. 33 eSpeed, Inc. Sec. Litig., In re, 232 F.R.D. 95 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) ......................... 18 Ferrari v. Gisch, 225 F.R.D. 599 (C.D. Cal. 2004) ................................. 18, 26, 33 Fuwei Films Sec. Litig., In re, 247 F.R.D. 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ...................... 20 iii Case: 20-1402 Document: 1-1 Filed: 03/10/2020 Pages: 137 (5 of 141) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Garbowski v. Tokai Pharm., Inc., 302 F. Supp. 3d 441 (D. Mass. 2018) ................................................................................................... 34 Gemstar-TV Guide Int’l, Inc. Sec. Litig., In re, 209 F.R.D. 447 (C.D. Cal. 2002) ............................................................................................................. 26 Hedick v. Kraft Heinz Co., No. 19-1339, 2019 WL 4958238 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 8, 2019) ......................................................................................................... 20 Hudson, In re, 710 F.3d 716 (7th Cir. 2013) ....................................................... 10 Johnson v. Tellabs, 214 F.R.D. 225 (N.D. Ill. 2002) .......................................... 19 Karkus, In re, No. 09-1500, 2010 WL 358974 (10th Cir. Jan. 27, 2010) ....................................................................................................................... 8 Karp v. Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., No. 19-6180, 2019 WL 5587148 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2019) ............................................................................... 26, 27 Karp v. Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., No. 19-6180, 2019 WL 6619351 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2019) ...................................................................................... 15 Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., In re, 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. Cir. 2014) ..................... 9 Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996) ............................................................ 9 Lacy v. Cook County, 897 F.3d 847 (7th Cir. 2018) ............................................ 20 Li Hong Cheng v. Canada Goose Holdings Inc., No. 19-8204, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209946 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2019) ......................................... 34 Lifson v. Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., No. 12-884, 2012 WL 12929878 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 14, 2012) ................................................................. 20 Micholle v. Ophthotech Corp., No. 17-0210, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41120 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2018) ........................................................................ 34 Morris v. Wachovia Sec., Inc., 223 F.R.D. 284 (E.D. Va. 2004) ....................... 22 Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits Trust v. Labranche & Co., 229 F.R.D. 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ........................................ 22 iv Case: 20-1402 Document: 1-1 Filed: 03/10/2020 Pages: 137 (6 of 141) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Piven v. Sykes Enters., Inc., 137 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (M.D. Fla. 2000) ........ 22, 27 Plaut v. Goldman Sachs Grp., Inc., No. 18-12084, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160255 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2019) ......................................................... 34 Reitan v. China Mobile Games & Entm’t Group, Ltd., 68 F. Supp. 3d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) ................................................................................. 20, 34 Rolls Royce Corp., In re, 775 F.3d 671 (5th Cir. 2014) ........................................ 9 Shah v. Zimer Biomet Holdings, Inc., No. 16-815, 2017 WL 1207158 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 3, 2017) ..................................................................................... 20 Star Gas Sec. Litig., In re, No. 04-1766 , 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5827 (D. Conn. Apr. 8, 2005) ............................................................................. 34 Stein v. KPMG, LLP, 486 F.3d 753 (2d Cir. 2007) .............................................. 9 Varghese v. China Shenghuo Pharm. Holdings, Inc., 589 F. Supp. 2d 388 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ....................................................................................... 17 Wagner v. Spectrum Brands Legacy, Inc., No. 19-0178, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98251 (W.D. Wis. June 12, 2019) ............................................... 17 Wolfe v. AspenBio Pharma, Inc.,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Successor to Boeing 737 Likely to Be Built in State Page 1 of 3
    The Seattle Times: Successor to Boeing 737 likely to be built in state Page 1 of 3 Friday, December 30, 2005 - 12:00 AM Permission to reprint or copy this article or photo, other than personal use, must be obtained from The Seattle Times. Call 206-464-3113 or e-mail [email protected] with your request. Successor to Boeing 737 likely to be built in state By Dominic Gates Seattle Times aerospace reporter Good news from Boeing Commercial Airplanes Chief MIKE SIEGEL / THE SEATTLE TIMES Executive Alan Mulally: The company's next airplane after In 2004, Boeing Commercial the 787 is likely to be assembled in Washington state. And Airplanes CEO Alan Mulally an announcement on that program could come soon after the applauds Everett workers after 787 enters service in 2008. announcing the launch order for the 787 from All Nippon Airways. Mulally says he sees no reason why At least one Boeing critic thought the next plane up — the a replacement for the 737 won't be replacement for the narrow-body 737 — might be assembled built here, too. in Japan. But it appears the state's $3.2 billion tax-incentive package passed in 2004 has secured more than the 787. Asked in a year-end interview if the 737 replacement would be built here, Mulally responded: "I don't see any reason why not. "I couldn't be more pleased with the response we all have had [from Washington state]. We have so many people that understand the importance of improving our competitiveness," he added.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Vehicle Structural Layouts in Post-WWII Aircraft
    A Study of Vehicle Structural Layouts in Post-WWII Aircraft Mark D. Sensmeier* Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona, 86301 Jamshid A. Samareh† NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 23681 In this paper, results of a study of structural layouts of post-WWII aircraft are presented. This study was undertaken to provide the background information necessary to determine typical layouts, design practices, and industry trends in aircraft structural design. Design decisions are often predicated not on performance-related criteria, but rather on such factors as manufacturability, maintenance access, and of course cost. For this reason, a thorough understanding of current “best practices” in the industry is required as an input for the design optimization process. To determine these best practices and industry trends, a large number of aircraft structural “cutaway” illustrations were analyzed for five different aircraft categories (commercial transport jets, business jets, combat jet aircraft, single- engine propeller aircraft, and twin-engine propeller aircraft). Several aspects of wing design and fuselage design characteristics are presented here for the commercial transport and combat aircraft categories. A great deal of commonality was observed for transport structure designs over a range of eras and manufacturers. A much higher degree of variability in structural designs was observed for the combat aircraft, though some discernable trends were observed as well. Nomenclature Frames = Circumferential fuselage structures which help maintain fuselage shape and prevent skin buckling Longerons = Lengthwise fuselage structures which carry bending loads Ribs = Chordwise wing structures which maintain wing shape, carry shear, and prevent skin buckling Spars = Spanwise wing structures which provide primary wing resistance to aerodynamic bending loads I.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL PROGRAM #Aiaascitech
    4–8 JANUARY 2016 SAN DIEGO, CA The Largest Event for Aerospace Research, Development, and Technology FINAL PROGRAM www.aiaa-SciTech.org #aiaaSciTech 16-928 WHAT’S IMPOSSIBLE TODAY WON’T BE TOMORROW. AT LOCKHEED MARTIN, WE’RE ENGINEERING A BETTER TOMORROW. We are partnering with our customers to accelerate manufacturing innovation from the laboratory to production. We push the limits in additive manufacturing, advanced materials, digital manufacturing and next generation electronics. Whether it is solving a global crisis like the need for clean drinking water or travelling even deeper into space, advanced manufacturing is opening the doors to the next great human revolution. Learn more at lockheedmartin.com © 2014 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION VC377_164 Executive Steering Committee AIAA SciTech 2016 2O16 Welcome Welcome to the AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition 2016 (AIAA SciTech 2016) – the world’s largest event for aerospace research, development, and technology. We are confident that you will come away from San Diego inspired and with the tools necessary to continue shaping the future of aerospace in new and exciting ways. From hearing preeminent industry thought leaders, to attending sessions where cutting- edge research will be unveiled, to interacting with peers – this will be a most fulfilling week! Our organizing committee has worked hard over the past year to ensure that our plenary sessions examine the most critical issues facing aerospace today, such as aerospace science and Richard George Lesieutre technology policy, lessons learned from a half century of aerospace innovation, resilient design, Christiansen The Pennsylvania and unmanned aerial systems. We will also focus on how AIAA and other stakeholders in State University Sierra Lobo, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:19-Cv-02394 Document #: 109 Filed: 11/15/19 Page 1 of 24 Pageid #:2414
    Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 109 Filed: 11/15/19 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:2414 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE THE BOEING COMPANY ) No. 19 CV 2394 AIRCRAFT SECURITIES ) LITIGATION ) Judge John J. Tharp, Jr. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this putative class action, five plaintiffs are vying for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and to approve their selection of counsel to represent the class. For the reasons set forth below, the Court appoints the Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi as Lead Plaintiff and approves its selection of the law firm of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP as Lead Counsel. I. BACKGROUND This matter involves securities fraud claims predicated on statements issued by The Boeing Company regarding the safety of its 737 MAX aircraft. In a nutshell, the complaints filed to date allege that during the first part of 2019, Boeing misled investors about the financial prospects for its commercial airplanes business by misstating and concealing information about safety problems with the 737 MAX in the wake of investigations of the crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 in October 2018 and of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 in March 2019. Two class action complaints have been filed. The initial complaint (Case No. 19 CV 2394; the “Seeks” action) was filed on April 9, 2019, by plaintiff Richard Seeks on behalf of a class comprising purchasers of Boeing securities between January 8, 2019 and March 21, 2019. A subsequent complaint was filed by plaintiff Mercer Busch (Case No. 19 CV 3548; the “Busch” action) on May 28, 2019 on behalf of a class of persons who acquired Boeing securities between Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 109 Filed: 11/15/19 Page 2 of 24 PageID #:2414 January 8, 2019 and May 8, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    September 2006 Volume V, Issue V www.boeing.com/frontiers ROARING SUCCESS The EA-18G Growler makes its first public appearance and takes its initial flight. Here’s why this new aircraft is important to Boeing and its customer. HEAVY DUTY 18 ‘Fab’ has role on special 747 COME TOGETHER 22 Japan Apache: Tech + people STAR POWER 26 Satellite business aims high www.boeing.com K Y M C ` F C & B & C F 60116-01 BCDEFG A Job Job : : Cust This ad, the third in a new series from the company’s portfolio of community ads, reinforces Boeing’s support of the arts, which help enrich and enlighten the lives of people worldwide. These ads are published in support of arts-related events. § JOB NUMBER: BOEG-0000-M1834 Version: A Frontiers CLIENT: Boeing PRODUCT: Corporate Communications DIVISION: None Date: 11/4/05 9:42 AM Colors: Process Cyan, Process Magenta, PDM: Scott Simpson File Name: m1834vA_R2_Opera_Frntr.indd Process Yellow, Process Black Editor: Pat Owens Media: ADV Mag Fonts: Helvetica (Light Oblique; Type 1), Agenda QC: Yanez Color Sp: 4C FRONTIERS (Nwp; Type 1) Images: M1834CT03_OperaFR_HR_r2.eps (305 ppi), Print Producer: Kim Nosalik Scale: 1=1 Boeing-FNF_rev_ad-StPg.eps Traffi c Supervisor: Kelly Riordan Bleed: 8.875 in x 11.25 in Headline: In the arts, we fi nd our wings. Art Director: Greg Auer Trim: 8.375 in x 10.75 in Notes: Bill to: m2039 Copywriter: None Safety: 7.375 in x 9.875 in ECD/GCD: Guy Bommarito Gutter: None Folds: None, None Account Exec: Leanne Mayer Output%: 100% Client: Boeing Art Buyer: Cameo Amato Legal: None Designer: Anne Perry Design Director: Wayne Carey Retoucher: Patrick McCabe Vendor: Schawk SEPTEMBER 2006 Volume V, Issue V ON THE COVER: In the skies above the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Fiscal Committee Passes Job Killer Mandate
    VOLUME 37, NUMBER 26 ● AUGUST 26, 2011 ® Cost-Saving Workers’ Senate Fiscal Committee Comp Bills Await Passes Job Killer Mandate Senate Action The Senate cleaning-related or light building Two California Appropriations maintenance, window cleaning or food Chamber of Committee on cafeteria services, to retain employees Commerce- August 22 passed a of the former contractor for a minimum supported bills California of 60 days and thereafter offer continued that will help Chamber of employment unless the employees’ lower workers’ Commerce-opposed performance during that period was compensation costs bill that unfairly unsatisfactory. Support await action in the forces employers to hire Senate. a predecessor’s employees and ensures Forces Unionized Workforce ● AB 378 (Solorio; D-Anaheim) continued union representation, while CalChamber is opposed to this bill lowers pharmaceutical costs. undermining the at-will employment because it is designed to ensure that an ● AB 335 (Solorio; D-Anaheim) presumption in California, despite any incumbent union, elected as the bargain- lowers frictional costs in the workers’ change in employers. ing representative for the prior contractor, compensation system. AB 350 (Solorio; D-Anaheim), a will remain the bargaining representative “job killer” bill, inappropriately alters for the subsequent employer. Under the Pharmaceutical Costs the employment relationship by requiring “successor employer” doctrine, a subse- AB 378 lowers workers’ compensation any successor contractor for “property quent employer that: costs by removing incentives for services,” defined as licensed security, See Senate: Page 7 physicians to refer patients to pharmacies in which the physician or physician’s family has a financial interest, and establishes a temporary fee schedule to reimburse for compound drugs until the workers’ compensation administrative director can establish a formal one.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    July 2008 | Volume VII, Issue III www.boeing.com/frontiers July 2008 Volume VII, Issue III BOEING FRONTIERS ON THE COVER: The London landmark Big Ben. SHUTTERSTOCK.COM PHOTO; COVER DESIGN BY BRANDON LUONG COVER STORY SHUTTERSTOCK.COM PHOTO BRILLIANT! | 12 Boeing has a wide-ranging presence in the United Kingdom. The company operates The Portal, a decision-support center in Farnborough, with partner QinetiQ. Many British entities contribute to the 787 Dreamliner airplane. And Boeing’s partners are helping develop technologies that support Boeing products. Here’s a look at why the UK matters to Boeing—and vice versa. FEATURE STORY | 42 A clean shave Welcome to the Boeing Portland facility in Oregon, where huge hunks of metal are machined into airplane parts. The rate at which this site strips away metal to form a new part is the baseline on which Boeing measures its performance against the machining industry—and Port- land has one of the best metal-removal rates in the world. BOEING FRONTIERS JULY 2008 3 Contents BOEING FRONTIERS Proud bird | 25 With a flawless combat deployment in Iraq that included 1,500 successful sorties and 3,600 flight hours, the Bell Boeing V-22 tiltrotor is proving itself to be what the U.S. Marines have said all along it would be: an aircraft that will transform military operations. Looking 30 years ahead | 26 Maintaining its technological edge is a matter the Super Hornet program at Boeing takes seriously. The program is following a strategy—the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet “Fight Plan”—that charts the course for improving this aircraft’s combat capability over the next three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • How Airbus Surpassed Boeing: a Tale of Two Competitors
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2007 How Airbus Surpassed Boeing: A Tale of Two Competitors William Alexander Burns University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Burns, William Alexander, "How Airbus Surpassed Boeing: A Tale of Two Competitors. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/252 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William Alexander Burns entitled "How Airbus Surpassed Boeing: A Tale of Two Competitors." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Richard Ranaudo, U. Peter Solies Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William A. Burns entitled “How Airbus Surpassed Boeing: A Tale of Two Competitors” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    May 2006 Volume V, Issue I www.boeing.com/frontiers THANKS A MILLION A recent U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III mission put the fleet of airlifters at 1 million hours of flight. Here’s a look at this milestone mission—and at what this achievement means to the people on the C-17 program. QUIET COMMITMENT18 IN IT TOGETHER 26 IN OUR AREAS 30 Life in a classified program Building supplier relationships How ECF support helps Download music up high. K Y M C ` 106886_1 FCB Job Job : : Cust It’s easy with Connexion by Boeing. The world’s first in-flight, real-time, high-speed Internet service. You can access it from any seat on the plane. § Then, download your favorite tunes. Exchange e-mails. Or just sit back and surf the net. Sign up now at http://www.connexionbyboeing.com/signup JOB NUMBER: BOEG-CONX-M2174 CLIENT: Boeing PRODUCT: Connexion DIVISION: None Date: 4/13/06 2:23 PM Colors: Process Cyan, Process Magenta, PDM: Scott Simpson/V. Walsh File Name: m2174_R0_Tune_Frntr.indd Process Yellow, Process Black Editor: Pat Owens Media: ADV Mag Fonts: Myriad Pro (Semibold, Regular, Bold; Open- QC: Justin O’Brien Color Sp: 4C FRONTIERS Type) Images: cnx_music_822_r2.eps, cnx_music_822_r2b. Print Producer: Ami Walters Scale: 1=1 eps, CbB_mark_R_primary_rev.eps Traffi c Supervisor: Marie Reyes Bleed: 8.875 in x 11.25 in Headline: Arrow Art Director: Chris Tag Trim: 8.375 in x 10.75 in Notes: Bill to m2171 Copywriter: Guy Bommarito Safety: 7.375 in x 9.875 in ECD/GCD: Guy Bommarito Gutter: None Folds: None, None Account Exec: Daina Gjemre Output%: 100% Client: Boeing Art Buyer: Cameo Amato Legal: None Designer: Anne Perry Design Director: Wayne Carey Retoucher: Karyn Bieneman Vendor: Schawk MAY 2006 Volume V, Issue I ON THE COVER: C-17 Globemaster III Photo by Kevin Flynn O T GINA VANATTER PHO GINA VANATTER COVER STORY HOUR RECORD 12 The fleet of C-17 Globemaster III military airlifters recently reached 1 million hours of flight.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing's Behavior in a Liberalized Marketplace: the 787 Dreamliner
    Boeing’s Behavior in a Liberalized Marketplace: The 787 Dreamliner Project and Impact on Puget Sound Workers Jesse L. Mseitif A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Washington 2014 Committee: Michael Honey Jeffrey Begun William McGuire Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Tacoma 2 Copyright© 2014 Jesse Mseitif 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to give a huge thank you to all the people who made it possible for me to complete my thesis. To Dr. Honey, thank you for sacrificing your time and taking on the role of my committee chair. Your teaching at this institution, writing, and work with the community is a true inspiration. In the spring of 2013 you gave me positive feedback of my initial proposal, which gave me confidence to move forward with my research. Dr. Begun, thank you for being a committee reader and terrific professor. Comparative Economic Development was a joy. Your clear presentation of the materials solidified my understanding of fundamental economic principles. Dr. McGuire, although I was never your student, you were still willing to give me your time and attention. With a professor’s busy schedule, that means a lot. You’re one heck of an economist! I’m also grateful to all the professors and faculty in the MAIS program: Linda Kachinsky, thanks for helping me navigate the program, enjoy your retirement!; Dr. Parker, who opened my eyes to important concepts in 503 and 504; Dr. Williams, knower of all things politics and one cool dude; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Boeing's 737 MAX Crisis on Account of Leadership Failure
    International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management 116 Volume-3, Issue-9, September-2020 journals.resaim.com/ijresm | ISSN (Online): 2581-5792 | RESAIM Publishing A Case Study on Boeing's 737 MAX Crisis on Account of Leadership Failure Subhendu Bhattacharya1*, Y. Nisha2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Amity Global Business School, Mumbai, India 2Associate Professor, Department of Management, Amity Global Business School, Mumbai, India *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: American multinational corporation Boeing is one of recent past. Lion Air Flight 610 that took off from Jakarta, the reputed organizations in the field of aerospace manufacturing. Indonesia crashed into the Java Sea on October 29th, 2018 Since its inception by William Boeing in Seattle, Washington in killing all 189 passengers and crew. About five months hence, July 15th, 1916, it has surpassed several milestones and grown from strength to strength. It started its venture in areas such as Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 that took off from Addis Ababa, designing and crafting airplanes, rotorcraft, rockets, satellites and Ethiopia crashed near the town of Bishoftu ending lives of all also stepped into production of telecommunications equipment, 157 people aboard on March 10th, 2019. The two horrific missiles and made a mark in every field of operation. It has a incidents sent a shockwave across the aviation industry revered status in Dow Jones Industrial Average and made a worldwide, triggered innumerable investigations and grounded glaring presence in the Fortune Global 500 list. But the global numerous Boeing 737 Max jets globally. Both crashed jets were recognition got eclipsed after fatal crashes in October 2018 and March 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Life on Edgethe Boeing Portland Touts World-Class Fabrication and Metal-Removal Rates
    Feature Story BOEING FRONTIERS cuttingLife on edgethe Boeing Portland touts world-class fabrication and metal-removal rates Machinist Dennis Higgs operates a Cramic milling machine at Boeing Portland. The airplane part is a flap track for the new 747-8. ED TURNER PHOTO 42 JULY 2008 BOEING FRONTIERS BOEING FRONTIERS JULY 2008 Feature Story BOEING FRONTIERS BY BRENDA PITTSLEY nium 5553, Inconel (a nickel-based alloy) and Carpenter 465 (a type of stainless steel). ncut titanium may look like one of the large silvery pieces of drift- Boeing Portland’s unassuming character is even reflected in its main wood that regularly wash up on Oregon’s beaches. But on the lobby. There, a wall is covered with shelves full of plaques and framed UBoeing Portland factory floor, the metal is hardly a piece of floating documents. But the display has nothing to do with the site’s industry or debris in terms of value. A 5,400-pound (2,449-kilogram) hunk of tita- professional accomplishments. They are testimonials from school chil- nium is valued at six figures. dren, senior citizens and community organizations that have benefited From the lumpy form of the metal will emerge a side-of-body chord, a from employees’ volunteer efforts over the decades. part that attaches a wing to an airplane body. A finished part—destined Not on display is the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Aviation for Boeing’s airplane production facilities in Washington state—weighs Safety Inspectors Recognition Award. This was presented to the site in 250 pounds (113 kilograms) and looks nothing like weathered wood.
    [Show full text]