DOCSLIB.ORG

Under Her Wing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2014 • minding other people’s BUSINESS • the keys to success • creative license nonprofit org. NYU LAW us Postage PaiD office of Development and alumni relations st. louis, mo 110 west third street, second floor Permit # 495 new york, ny 10012–1074 the magazine of new york university school of law law of school university york new of magazine the THE NYU LAW FUND Going Places Under Help our outstanding students pursue Her Wing their bright ideas. Since founding her specialty Please give to the law firm three decades ago, NYU Law Fund. Karen Freedman ‘80 has helped 2014 2014 50,000 children in crisis and | volume XX volume transformed New York City’s foster care system. For more information, please contact Nick Vagelatos at (212) 998-6007 or [email protected]. iv CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASS OF 2010! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASS OF 2010! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! CLAS 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 2009! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OFIt’s 1995! going CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASS OF 2010! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CtoLASS be a OFBLAST! 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASSFRIDAY OF 2010! TO SUNDAY, CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OFMAY 1980! 1 CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS– 3,OF 2015 2005! CLASS OF 2010! CLASS OF Please visit 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OFwww.law.nyu.edu/reunion/2015 1975! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASSfor OF more 2000! information CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASS OF 2010! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASSRE OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASS OF 2009! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASSUNION! OF 1980! CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS OF 2000! CLASS OF 2005! CLASS OF 2009! CLASS OF 1960! CLASS OF 1965! CLASS OF 1970! CLASS OF 1975! CLASS OF 1980! CLASS OF CLASS OF 1985! CLASS OF 1990! CLASS OF 1995! CLASS A OF Legacy of Learning The future of the Law School is yours to define. Making the Law School a part of your planned giving is “NYU Law gave my husband, Chuck, who a first step in creating an academic legacy of which you was in the class of 1955, can be proud. You can plant the seed of education today a chance to study the so that the scholars of tomorrow may enjoy its bloom. law. What he learned gave him the tools to fight for change and NYU Law gift plans are flexible and tailored to fit for our civil rights. your unique circumstances. Please contact Betsy Brown We both wanted to give at (212) 998-6701 or [email protected] to discuss back to the community that had embraced us, how your gift can best fit your financial picture. in the hope that others would have similar transformational experiences.” ellen conley of new connections to legal and policy work in gov- The ernment. Last year, for example, we launched a new semester-long clinic in Washington, DC, that places students in a range of offices across the federal gov- Morrison ernment. And thanks to the generosity of Trustee Jay Furman ’71, we also instituted the Furman Pub- lic Policy Scholarship Program, which is designed to Memo train and support outstanding students interested in pursuing careers in public policy. ne of the many qualities that attracted me to At the same time, we are working to expand our NYU Law is the institution’s deep commit- connections at the state and local government levels. Oment to public interest, and the extraordinary One way we’re doing this is through the New York quality, character, and diversity of the students who State Excelsior Service Fellowship Program, which come here as a result. NYU Law takes a broad view places graduates of select New York law schools in of public interest that hinges on the belief that all of state agencies ranging from the Department of Envi- us in the legal profession are responsible for promot- ronmental Conservation to the Department of Labor. ing justice—whether that means building careers in Through these various programmatic initiatives, nonprofit organizations or the government, or doing we will help new generations of NYU Law gradu- pro bono work while in pri- ates follow in the long tradition of alumni working vate practice. In choosing at all levels of government, from Anthony Foxx ’96, to apply their considerable US secretary of transportation, to Lisa Landau ’87, skills toward promoting chief of the Health Care Bureau at the New York the public interest, our State Office of the Attorney General, to Kenneth students and graduates Thompson ’92, the newly elected Kings County dis- render vital service to our trict attorney. Government is a creature of law, but country while also main- its laws are only as good as the lawyers attending taining and extending to them. I’m tremendously proud to have our tal- an enduring value of our ented alumni helping to ensure that our government Law School. runs efficiently and fairly, safeguarding both our In the pages of this collective welfare and our individual rights. magazine, we celebrate This year marks the 60th anniversary of the the pioneering work of first graduating class of the Root-Tilden-Kern Karen Freedman ’80, Scholarship Program, the bedrock of our strong founder and executive public interest mission. The program covers director of Lawyers For Children, and Sherrilyn the full cost of tuition for outstanding students Ifill ’87, president and director-counsel of the NAACP who plan to dedicate their careers to public ser- Legal Defense and Educational Fund and this year’s vice. The RTK program also had an instrumental Convocation speaker. We also commend the accom- role in establishing the Public Interest Law Cen- plishments of Sheila Birnbaum ’65, a partner at ter, thereby inspiring the spirit of public inter- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and special est that permeates our larger community. This master of the September 11th Victim Compensation important anniversary allows us to reflect on how Fund; Marshall Camp ’02, a partner at Irell & Manella RTK’s aims are shared by NYU Law as a whole. and lead attorney in the first case to test changes Collectively, we are dedicated to shaping the next to California’s criminal sentencing policies regard- generation of leaders, to fostering a dynamic com- ing juveniles; and Scott Fein LLM ’81, a partner at munity of scholars, and to ensuring that a con- Whiteman Osterman & Hannah who was counsel cern for the public interest is an integral part of for one of the longest-litigated civil rights cases in our students’ conceptions of themselves and their US history. Plus, we take great pride in the public roles, no matter which career paths they pursue. interest work that our faculty and students do on The 2014 magazine was begun and finished dur- a range of issues, including protecting free speech ing my first term as dean. The magazine staff and I and challenging unlawful government surveillance are eager to learn what you think of our news and sto- through our new Technology Law and Policy Clinic, ries and how we deliver them. Please take a moment which is described in this issue’s to let us know by filling out the reader story on intellectual property law. survey on the last page or online at In keeping with our expansive bit.do/nyulaw2014survey. view of public interest, the Law School As always, I welcome your thoughts in recent years has forged a number trevor morrison at [email protected]. 2014 • volume xxiv managing editor Jeanhee Kim creative director David Niedenthal designers Michael Bierman, Cheryl Hark, Kara Van Woerden writers Rachel Burns, Atticus Gannaway, 4 57 81 Michael Orey, Michelle Tsai Dicta Arguments Relevant special acknowledgment Elyse Mall Klayman, former & Opinions Parties Assistant Dean for Communications contributing writers Thomas Adcock, Chelsea Allison, Christopher Borgen ’95, Peter Carbonara, Candy J. Cooper, Amy Feldman, Catherine Fredman, Lily Batchelder is appointed Jennifer Frey, Erin Geiger Smith, to the National Economic David Krajicek, Robert Levine, Council; NYU Law to launch Bryan Stevenson shares Sherrilyn Ifill ’87 delivers Duff McDonald, Christine Pakkala, intimate stories of mass a stirring convocation speech Larry Reibstein the Institute for Executive Advancement; Gabrielle incarceration and capital on democracy; Elena Kagan photographers Apollon ’15 testifies on human punishment; Richard and Martin Edelman receive Cover photograph by rights violations in Brazil; Epstein contemplates his honorary law degrees; Sam Hollenshead Scott Fein LLM ’81 closes a transformation to a classical graduates reflect on their Mathieu Asselin, Riccardo Cavallari, 14-year-long pro bono civil liberal; Amanda Levendowski accomplishments; Reunion Dan Creighton, Mark Finkenstaedt, rights case; and more.
Recommended publications
  • Keeping Faith with the Constitution in Changing Times

    Keeping Faith with the Constitution in Changing Times

    Vanderbilt Law School Program in Constitutional Law & Theory and The American Constitution Society Present KEEPING FAITH WITH THE CONSTITUTION IN CHANGING TIMES October 6-7, 2006 Flynn Auditorium Vanderbilt Law School What does it mean to be faithful to the meaning of the Constitution? Can progressive approaches to constitutional interpretation persuasively lay claim to principle, fidelity, adherence to the rule of law and democratic legitimacy? How can these approaches be effectively communicated and made part of the public debate about the Constitution? A diverse group of scholars, lawyers, journalists and judges will address different aspects of this inquiry over two days of panel discussions and roundtable conversations during “Keeping Faith with the Constitution in Changing Times,” a conference sponsored jointly by Vanderbilt Law School’s Program in Constitutional Law & Theory and the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy. CONFERENCE SCHEDULE Friday, October 6 8:45-9:15 Continental Breakfast in North Lobby 9:15-9:45 Opening Remarks Dean Ed Rubin, Vanderbilt Law School Lisa Brown, Executive Director, ACS 9:45-10:30 Origins of the Debate over Originalism and the Living Constitution (Christopher Yoo, Moderator) Barry Friedman Howard Gillman 10:30-10:45 Break 10:45-12:15 Constitutional Fidelity Over Time (Ed Rubin, Moderator) Erwin Chemerinsky Marty Lederman John McGinnis 12:15-1:30 Lunch North Lobby 1:30-3:00 The Varieties of Historical Argument (Deborah Hellman, Moderator) Peggy Cooper Davis Robert Gordon Richard Primus
  • Our Friends and Partners in Meeting Urgent And

    Our Friends and Partners in Meeting Urgent And

    The Jewish Agency is proud and privileged to represent the voices OUR FRIENDS of Jewish communities around the world. Our partners and friends ensure that we have the global reach and financial strength to AND PARTNERS address the needs of the Jewish people on a large scale, along with IN MEETING the infrastructure to quickly meet urgent needs as they arise. To all our many friends and supporters around the globe, we offer our profound thanks for your partnership in securing the URGENT AND Jewish future. IMPORTANT NEEDS 2015 The Jewish Agency is privileged to partner with the Jewish Federations of North America and Keren Hayesod/UIA, as well as foundations and other donors in Israel and around the world. Thank you for helping us secure the Jewish future. THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA To the Jewish Federations of North America and Keren Hayesod/UIA, your core support powers our global partnership. No single gift touches more lives. We also thank the many Federations who not only provide indispensable core funding, but also make designated grants to critical programs and emergency campaigns. Jewish Community Board of Akron Jewish Federation of Collier County Jewish Federation of Greater Houston Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley Jewish Colorado Jewish Federation of Greater Indianapolis Jewish Federation of Greater Ann Arbor Columbia Jewish Federation Jewish Federation of Jacksonville Jewish Federation of Arkansas Jewish Federation of Columbus Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Jewish Federation of Cumberland, Knoxville Jewish Alliance Gloucester & Salem Counties Jewish Federation of Atlantic Jewish Federation of Las Vegas & Cape May Counties Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas Jewish Federation of Lee Augusta Jewish Federation Jewish Federation of Greater Dayton, Inc.
  • From the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission to the Courthouse: Does Civil Rights Litigation Remediate Racial Inequality in the Workplace?

    From the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission to the Courthouse: Does Civil Rights Litigation Remediate Racial Inequality in the Workplace?

    From the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission to the Courthouse: Does Civil Rights Litigation Remediate Racial Inequality in the Workplace? By David Berney ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the ability of civil rights litigation to redress racial inequality in the workplace. It enters the larger historical debate regarding the effectiveness of civil rights litigation to serve as a force for progressive, socio- political change. To focus my inquiry, I studied the operations of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, an administrative agency charged with enforcing civil rights laws. I also interviewed major participants in the civil rights litigation system, including complainants, attorneys, and judges. I drew upon my own experiences as a practicing civil rights attorney. My investigation employed a range of different methods, including interviews, ethnographic observation, and archival research. This is, to my knowledge, the first full study of the actual operations of an important state civil rights agency in close to fifty years. My dissertation finds that litigation has historically promoted racial equality in employment. But two factors have contributed to limit what lawsuits can realistically accomplish today. First, starting in the 1970s, Republican presidential administrations appointed judges who proved less sympathetic to civil rights claims. The resulting case law made it much harder to bring successful lawsuits. Second, expressions of workplace bias became much more covert over time partly as a consequence of the successes that civil rights litigators achieved. The litigation paradigm is not well designed to tackle such subtleties. Beyond a lack of effectiveness, litigation can also have deleterious effects as it can cause employees to suffer psychic injury on top of whatever racial indignities they have endured.
  • Khanty Mansiysk Autonomous Region Yugra Russia Siberia Россия

    Khanty Mansiysk Autonomous Region Yugra Russia Siberia Россия

    Россия Сибирь ХантыМансийский автономный округ Югра KhantyMansiysk Autonomous Region Yugra Russia Siberia ДУХ ОГНЯ / НАЙ АНГКИ / SPIRIT OF FIRE / 2007 ОРГКОМИТЕТ ФЕСТИВАЛЯ / ORGANIZING COMMITTEE OF THE FESTIVAL Ìèõàèë Åôèìîâè÷ Øâûäêîé Nail Kashapov Alexey Ovsyannikov Ðóêîâîäèòåëü Ôåäåðàëüíîãî àãåíòñòâà ïî Chief medical officer of the territorial admin- Deputy Chairman of the Government of the êóëüòóðå è êèíåìàòîãðàôèè, ñîïðåäñåäàòåëü istration of Rospotrebnadzor in the Khanty- autonomous district for problems of small îðãêîìèòåòà Mansiysk autonomous district – Yugra nationalities of the North, Director of the Mikhail Shvydkoy Department of the autonomous district for Head of the Federal Agency for Culture and Âÿ÷åñëàâ Ìèõàéëîâè÷ Êîçëîâñêèé problems of small nationalities of the North Cinema, co-chairman of the organizing committee Çàìåñòèòåëü íà÷àëüíèêà Óïðàâëåíèÿ âíóòðåííèõ äåë àâòîíîìíîãî îêðóãà, Çèíàèäà Áîðèñîâíà Ñàõàóòäèíîâà Àëåêñàíäð Âàñèëüåâè÷ Ôèëèïåíêî íà÷àëüíèê ìèëèöèè îáùåñòâåííîé Ïðåäñåäàòåëü Êîìèòåòà ïî âíåøíèì Ãóáåðíàòîð, Ïðåäñåäàòåëü Ïðàâèòåëüñòâà áåçîïàñíîñòè ñâÿçÿì àâòîíîìíîãî îêðóãà àâòîíîìíîãî îêðóãà, ñîïðåäñåäàòåëü îðãêîìèòåòà Vyacheslav Kozlovsky Zinaida Sakhautdinova Alexander Filipenko Deputy Chief of the Department of internal Chairman of the Ñommittee for foreign Governor, Chairman of the Government of affairs of the autonomous district, chief of relations of the autonomous district the Autonomous District, co-chairman police of public safety of the organizing committee Àëåêñàíäð Ïàâëîâè÷ Ñåìåíîâ Àëåêñàíäð Âèòàëüåâè÷
  • Visiting Judges

    Visiting Judges

    Visiting Judges Marin K. Levy* Despite the fact that Article III judges hold particular seats on particular courts, the federal system rests on judicial interchangeability. Hundreds of judges “visit” other courts each year and collectively help decide thousands of appeals. Anyone from a retired Supreme Court Justice to a judge from the U.S. Court of International Trade to a district judge from out of circuit may come and hear cases on a given court of appeals. Although much has been written about the structure of the federal courts and the nature of Article III judgeships, little attention has been paid to the phenomenon of “sitting by designation”—how it came to be, how it functions today, and what it reveals about the judiciary more broadly. This Article offers an overdue account of visiting judges. It begins by providing an origin story, showing how the current practice stems from two radically different traditions. The first saw judges as fixed geographically, and allowed for visitors only as a stopgap measure when individual judges fell ill or courts fell into arrears with their cases. The second assumed greater fluidity within the courts, requiring Supreme Court Justices to ride circuit—to visit different regions and act as trial and appellate judges—for the first half of the Court’s history. These two traditions together provide the critical context for modern-day visiting. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZK55M67 Copyright © 2019 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications.
  • Omnipresent Student Speech and the Schoolhouse Gate: Interpreting Tinker in the Digital Age

    Omnipresent Student Speech and the Schoolhouse Gate: Interpreting Tinker in the Digital Age

    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 59 Number 2 Current Issues in Education Law Article 9 (Winter 2015) 2015 Omnipresent Student Speech and the Schoolhouse Gate: Interpreting Tinker in the Digital Age Watt Lesley Black Jr. Ph.D. [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Watt L. Black Jr. Ph.D., Omnipresent Student Speech and the Schoolhouse Gate: Interpreting Tinker in the Digital Age, 59 St. Louis U. L.J. (2015). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol59/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW OMNIPRESENT STUDENT SPEECH AND THE SCHOOLHOUSE GATE: INTERPRETING TINKER IN THE DIGITAL AGE WATT LESLEY BLACK, JR. PH.D.* INTRODUCTION Historically, school authorities rarely took note of student expression that occurred outside of the school setting, but the times have changed. Technological advances have broadened the scope and reach of student speech in ways that were difficult to imagine twenty years ago. Students are using technology to threaten, bully, and harass not only their classmates, but also school employees. School administrators face enormous pressure to effectively address these issues, but they must also consider the First Amendment rights of students when deciding how and when to discipline them for what they say online while off campus.
  • Third Judicial Circuit Courts and Community Committee 2019 Activity Report

    Third Judicial Circuit Courts and Community Committee 2019 Activity Report

    THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURTS AND COMMUNITY COMMITTEE 2019 ACTIVITY REPORT March 24, 2020 Third Judicial Circuit Courts and Community Committee 2019 Activity Report The governing body of the federal courts, the Judicial Conference of the United States, recently “affirmed that civics education is a core component of judicial service; endorsed regularly-held conferences to share and promote best practices of civics education; and encouraged circuits to coordinate and promote education programs.” The Courts and Community Committee for the Third Judicial Circuit is proud to be part of the judiciary’s national initiative to present and promote civics education programs. The Third Circuit Committee had another busy year in 2019. This Activity Report highlights some of the initiatives that our judges and court staff participated in throughout the year as part of the Committee’s ongoing effort to connect our courts to our communities and improve understanding of the role of the judicial system in our democracy. ADULT CIVICS EDUCATION PROGRAM At the behest of Third Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith, and after many months of planning, the Committee sponsored a ten-week adult civics education course that was launched in September 2019 at the Community College of Philadelphia. Courts and Community Committee Co-Chairs Midge Rendell and Cynthia Rufe created a ten-class curriculum and recruited federal and state judges, as well as attorneys, to lead and present topics of interest for each fifty-minute session on Monday nights during the fall. Dean Dave Thomas, along with strong administrative support, registered over sixty students for the minimal fee certificate course.
  • SCRSS Digest Spring 2013

    SCRSS Digest Spring 2013

    Information Digest Spring 2013 Price £1.00 Initially Putin was confronted with Contents challenges on all sides: by the expansion of NATO into Hungary, Poland and the Czech Vladimir Putin and His Policies 1 Republic; by NATO strikes against Serbia; SCRSS News 3 by a growing Islamist secessionist threat in Member Obituaries 6 Chechnya and Dagestan; by the withholding Soviet Memorial Trust Fund News 8 of taxes by major companies and regional The New Russian FBI 9 governments. Putin’s position as president Stalin’s Personal Library 11 was undermined by business interest A Soviet Design for Life 13 groups who influenced deputies to defeat Whither Lenfilm? 14 his tax proposals. Reports 16 Reviews 17 Listings 19 Feature Vladimir Putin and His Policies By David Lane Vladimir Putin, with the support of President Yeltsin and the Russian economic oligarchs, arrived on the Russian political scene as appointed prime minister in August 1999 and jumped immediately onto the international stage when appointed acting president on 31 December 1999. For the first two years or so, as far as the West was President Vladimir Putin (courtesy of RIA Novosti) concerned, his work was acceptable. Putin maintained and even developed the market The oligarchs, particularly Khodorkovsky, economy. At home the power of the believed that the private sector could utilise oligarchs, such as Berezovsky who had Russia’s massive energy resources, from backed him, went unchallenged and Yeltsin which they profited, better than the state. was given immunity from prosecution. By Putin and his government believed the advent of his third term of presidency in otherwise.
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission Public Hearing Transcript (February 16, 2012)

    U.S. Sentencing Commission Public Hearing Transcript (February 16, 2012)

    1 1 Before the 2 UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION 3 Public Hearing 4 Thursday, February 16, 2012 5 Federal Judicial Center, Classrooms A-C 6 Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building 7 One Columbus Circle 8 Washington, DC 20002-8002 9 The hearing was convened, pursuant to 10 notice, at 8:39 a.m., before: 11 JUDGE PATTI B. SARIS, Chairwoman 12 MR. WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., Vice Chairman 13 MS. KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, Vice Chairwoman 14 CHIEF JUDGE RICARDO H. HINOJOSA, 15 Commissioner 16 JUDGE BERYL A. HOWELL, Commissioner 17 MS. DABNEY FRIEDRICH, Commissioner 18 MR. JONATHAN J. WROBLEWSKI, Ex-Officio 19 Member of the Commissioner 20 21 22 COURT REPORTER: Jane W. Beach, Ace-Federal Reporters 2 1 PANEL I: Current State of Federal Sentencing 2 HONORABLE PAUL BARBADORO 3 United States District Judge 4 District of New Hampshire 5 MATTHEW AXELROD 6 Associate Deputy Attorney General 7 United States Department of Justice 8 CHARLES SAMUELS, Director 9 Federal Bureau of Prisons 10 RAYMOND MOORE 11 Federal Public Defender 12 Districts of Colorado and Wyoming 13 ROUNDTABLE I: Improving the Advisory Guideline 14 System 15 HONORABLE GERARD LYNCH 16 United States Circuit Judge 17 United States Court of Appeals for 18 the Second Circuit 19 HONORABLE ANDRE M. DAVIS 20 United States Circuit Judge 21 United States Court of Appeals for 22 the Fourth Circuit 3 1 ROUNDTABLE I (Continued): 2 HENRY BEMPORAD 3 Federal Public Defender 4 Western District of Texas 5 PROFESSOR SUSAN R. KLEIN 6 Alice McKean Young Regents Chair in Law 7 University of Texas School of Law 8 MATTHEW MINER 9 Attorney 10 Washington, DC 11 ROUNDTABLE II: Restoring Mandatory Guidelines 12 HONORABLE THEODORE McKEE 13 Chief United States Circuit Judge 14 Third Circuit Court of Appeals 15 HONORABLE WILLIAM K.
  • Delc Newsletter

    Delc Newsletter

    Division of European Languages & April 2013 Issue 2, 2012/13 Cultures, School of LLC DELC NEWSLETTER WELCOME IN THIS ISSUE: In the second issue of our 2012/13 Newsletter we bring you reports Staff, PhD & Graduate News p1 of our most recent staff news and the many events which have taken EUSA Teaching Award Nominations p3 place across DELC. We’re pleased to be able to provide details of our very successful language plays, which you’ll find on page 6. A Year Abroad Experience p4 current student offers some advice on studying in Russia and we have Language Plays p6 information on a UoE society founded by DELC students. This Events p9 issue also provides details of new publications by our staff. Societies p14 A big thank you to all contributors, please keep your input coming: Staff Publications p15 [email protected]. Aaron Tregellis Hodgson, Doctoral Candidate – AHRC Award STAFF, PHD Aaron Tregellis Hodgson, a doctoral candidate under the supervision of Dr Alexandra Smith, has recently been awarded & GRADUATE NEWS a grant to participate in the prestigious 'Russian Archive Training Scheme (RATS)' course, to be held in Moscow 9-14 April 2013. The scheme is being run by Dr Polly Jones (University of Oxford), and the grant was awarded on a competitive basis by CRCEES (sponsored by the AHRC). The Dr Leanne Dawson, scheme offers an intensive program of visits and tours of DELC Postdoctoral Fellow – KE Grant various major state archives and libraries in Russia, with the aim of familiarising students with the procedures for carrying out Dr.
  • Current Movies Listing Zoology

    Current Movies Listing Zoology

    Current Movies Listing Russian Movie Director: Ivan I. Tverdovsky Zoology (Apr17) Cast: Natalia Pavlenkova, Dmitry Groshev, Irina Chipizhenko Director: Dmitry Suvorov Cast: Svetlana Khodchenkova, Ekaterina The Classmates (Mar17) Vilkova, Valentina Mazunina, Olga Kuzmina, Roman Yunusov, Denis Kosjakov Director: Johnny O’Reilly Moscow Never Sleep (Jan17) Cast: Alexey Serebryakov, Evgenia Brik, Yuri Stoyanov Director: Mikhail Mestetskiy Rag Union (Oct16) Cast: Alexander Pal, Ivan Yankovskiy, Vassily Butkevich, Pavel Chinarev Director: Anna Melikyan Cast: Renata Litvinova, Vladimir Mashkov, About Love (Aug16) Yevgeny Tsyganov, Mikhail Efremov, Maria Shalayeva, Yulia Snigir Director: Jury Feting Cast: Mikhail Gasanov, Petr Novikov, Irina Celestial Camel (Ju116) Hurgunova, Danzan Badrashkiev, Batr Mandzhiev, Baira Mandzhieva Director: Zhora Kryzhovnikov Cast: Dmitry Nagiyev, Olga Seryabkina, Yulia The Very Best Day (Jun16) Aleksandrova, Elena Yakovleva, Sergey Lavygin, Valentina Mazunina Director: Dina Shturmanova Cast: Vitaly Gogunsky, Ivan Okhlobystin, Yulia Parshuta, Yuri Stoyanov, Zhanna Epple, The Bartender (Mar16) Konstantin Kryukov, Anton Bogdanov, Olga Buzova, Eugene Yarushnikova, Konstantin Fyodorov Encore Inflight Limited 16A, B2B Centre, 36 Connaught Road West, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel +852 2915 5551 Fax +852 2915 5525 www.encoreinflight.com Director: Tair Mamedov Cast: Alexander Golovin, Denis Kosjakov, Women Vs. Men (Jan16) Roman Yunusov, Maria Kravchenko, Nastasya Samburskaya, Natalia Rudova, Tair Mamedov, Oleg Vereshchagin Director:
  • R E P O R T on the ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE on the JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE 103D CONGRESS Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules UNIT

    R E P O R T on the ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE on the JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE 103D CONGRESS Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules UNIT

    1 104TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session SENATE 104±343 "! R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE DURING THE 103D CONGRESS PURSUANT TO Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE JULY 31, 1996.ÐOrdered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 25±786 WASHINGTON : 1996 SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HOWARD M. METZENBAUM, Ohio STROM THURMOND, South Carolina DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa HOWELL HEFLIN, Alabama ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PAUL SIMON, Illinois HANK BROWN, Colorado HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin WILLIAM S. COHEN, Maine DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LARRY PRESSLER, South Dakota CAROL MOSELEY-BRAUN, Illinois CYNTHIA C. HOGAN, Chief Counsel CATHERINE M. RUSSELL, Staff Director SALLY SHAFROTH, Chief Clerk MARK R. DISLER, Minority Staff Director SHARON PROST, Minority Chief Counsel (II) SUBCOMMITTEES IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE AFFAIRS EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts, Chairman PAUL SIMON, Illinois ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming ANTITRUST, MONOPOLIES AND BUSINESS RIGHTS HOWARD M. METZENBAUM, Ohio, Chairman DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona STROM THURMOND, South Carolina HOWELL HEFLIN, Alabama ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PAUL SIMON, Illinois ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS AND TRADEMARKS DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming HOWELL HEFLIN, Alabama CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California HANK BROWN, Colorado TECHNOLOGY AND THE LAW PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LARRY PRESSLER, South Dakota COURTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE HOWELL HEFLIN, Alabama, Chairman HOWARD M.