DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Equatoria State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Equatoria State ! ! ! ! Central! Equatoria State Map ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 30°E ! 31°E ! ! 32°E ! ! !Ngwer ! Korikori Ngop Fagiel Wulu Paker ! Gumro ! Lual ! ! Unagok Alel ! ! ! Ashandit Kulu Chundit ! ! ! Makuac Bor ! Atiit Bunagok Yirol West ! ! Deng Shol Pengko Eassi Dekada Jerweng ! ! ! ! ! ! Br!ong Anyidi Wulu Pul Anyuol ! Anuol !! ! Macdit !Rokon ! Minikolome Kwal Tiu ! Malangya ! Khalil ! ! Wurrie!r ! Latolot Aw! erial ! Tukls Kondoagoi Lake Nyiropo " ! ! Wako ! Lakes Anyat Awan ! ! ! Nyiel ! ! ! Bahr El Girin Awerial ! Bor South ! Pwora Mvolo ! Dor Jonglei " ! Minkamman Jalango Aliab ! ! Guar ! Aliab Dogoba Kila ! ! ! ! ! Malek N Dorri N ° ! Wun Abiyei ° Ambo ! 6 ! Pariak 6 Bengeya ! Golo ! ! ! Dijeyr ! Pariak ! Wun Thou! Gira Melekwich ! ! Domeri ! Wun Chwei ! Panabang Mangi ! ! Jabor ! Koalikiri Tal!i ! Mvolo ! " Melwel Latuk Lesi ! ! Bari Dakada ! ! ! Awiri Verlingai ! Wasi ! ! Tellang Banwar Dari ! ! Jakari Tombi Ndia Azai ! Mirda ! ! Mulinda ! Duboro Yeri Delinoi ! Mandari ! ! ! ! ! Teri Tur ! Gwojo-Adung Azai Kasiko ! ! Kulundulu ! Gaya ! Tiarki ! ! ! !Bori Mejiki G!utetian ! ! Kulwo ! Jarrah ! Maralinn Bogora Gigging Bogori ! Vora ! ! ! ! Bita Muni Gemmaiza ! " ! !Lakamadi Tindalo Terekeka ! Gobo Poko Gabir ! Bokuna ! ! Duwwo Wani Mika! Gulu Rushi ! ! Pagar ! Tukara ! ! Bitti ! Abdulla Mbara ! ! ! Lamindo Pom ! Magiri ! Gali Kederu Lopore Wala ! Kpakpawiya ! Kediba ! Onayo ! Amad! i ! Bulu Koli ! Ire " ! ! ! Wandi Wito Riku Doso ! ! ! Rego Logono ! ! Terekeka ! Kemande Wit " ! Mariba ! ! ! Gabir Ma!gara ! Movo ! ! Minga ! ! Juban Rambo Gullu Western Equatoria Amardi ! ! ! ! ! " ! Gabat ! " ! Badigeru Swamp Mundri Lui ! Wiro River Meri ! Mundri East Kotobi ! Bala Pool Lafon ! Lanyi ! ! ! Yalo Mundri West Mangalla Buko " ! !Madi Buaji ! ! Naramoa ! Laporu Karika Land!igwa Rokon Tijor ! " ! ! Gunba Mulai Bunduqiyah ! Kalala ! Bahr Olo ! Wulikare ! ! Nidri ! Bundukki Jambo Jalang ! ! ! ! ! Luala ! Gariya ! ! Miden N ! ! El Iqlim Al Istiwa'i N ! ° ° ! 5 ! Kporolo 5 Gori ! River Nyigera ! ! Gamichi Zesi River Luri ! Maridi ! Gondokoro Lokoya ! Mogiri ! Gworolorongo ! Diko ! ! ! ! River Wanga Mambe ! ! Rigl Bibi Wuneba Bangolo ! ^! !! ! Kamarok Lologo ! Mandubulu ! ! Kima!ngoro Jeraputa ! ! ! Buripiong Tappi ! ! Mendopolo Central ! Equatoria ! ! Glaud Rapids ! Rija ! Lokotak Rejaf Marata ! Ngangala Omio ! Juba ! ! Lowoi Njada Papua ! Naam ! ! ! Lowoi Luli ! ! ! Toboya Bungu ! Dorolili Tore Wandi ! ! Lefureur ! Sheikh Bring!i ! ! ! Liria Ilyeito Wandi Rapids Mankole ! " ! ! Kolier Koturomi ! Kuju ! Nyake A! ngabi ! ! ! ! Mangara Irido ! ! Gopur Teteramon ! Itchire Rasolo Garmabe Qarambi J!igokwe ! ! Lagere ! ! ! ! Wawa ! ! ! Kungu Baranga ! ! ! Fidiya ! Lukala Fadl El Mula ! ! Digali ! ! Kalipapa Peki Fedde Baka Tukudungwen ! ! Kuba ! River Ongedon ! ! ! ! ! Lokiliri ! Rigl Aua ! ! Mukpara ! Marabi ! Koli Lagogolo Yaffa Rombari ! ! ! Garmabe Shitata ! Monji ! Ueli Kukudu ! ! ! ! Duduru Okaru ! Ganzi ! Maraw!a Tapuri ! ! ! ! Kuiaji ! Sindiru ! ! Mafi ! Komandani Bongwa Kamuri Duro Kundru ! ! Pego Lukupiri! ! ! Torit ! Bereka ! Yangwera Loragwe ! Adio ! ! ! !Loszek ! !! Lopi Egwi Lokorupo ! ! Girn ! ! Kinda Mari ! ! Lorumba ! ! Muturu !Lainya ! Maradu Odio ! ! ! " ! ! ! Makaia Soka ! ! ! Niarakuj Gado ! Lobonok Niaporo ! River Manya Goli Ro!ue ! ! ! Mongwa! ! Lagora ! L! a!yo ! Avokoia Marakan Lainya ! ! ! Kadili ! Kili ! ! Koropa !Yei Araka ! Luga ! ! Kit Omit ! ! L!oka West ! ! ! Biri ! ! ! Nyigo ! ! ! ! ! ! Lopangwe ! ! Goli Keki ! Kijo Lokobo Koya ! ! Mngali ! ! ! Ramili Ameda ! ! Dimu 2 ! ! Luri ! ! Tukala Wontambi ! Nyakol ! Buri Malewo ! Keni ! Samba Kainye Fagar ! ! Iindi !! ! ! ! Mapoko ! ! ! Rume Sajo ! ! Sadim ! ! Ameh Pisa Limbe ! ! ! ! ! Kembe ! ! Bari Gado ! ! ! Lim ! !Abara ! Wapu Minori ! Moga ! ! ! ! Logo ! Kaluli Labizuzo ! Penda ! ! ! !! ! Karpeto " !T!erubi ! ! Chilikwa Pakire ! ! ! ! Gimunu ! ! Korkimo ! ! Kopera ! ! Limuro Kogwo Ye!i M! arani ! Loga Fajelu ! " ! ! ! ! Afoyi !! ! Rony ! Ribi ! Ame ! ! ! ! ! Arado Kagelu! ! Mundu! Mundo ! ! Madi Pakula !! ! ! ! Kalo ! Wuji ! ! ! Tambura ! ! ! Ro! ny!i Jamara ! ! Gober Abegi Alero ! Dongoro ! ! !Goja ! Dukunya N ! ! !! N ° Piowa Ariga Eastern Equatoria ° ! ! ! 4 Rubeki Paer Walrakitter 4 ! Lu ! Kala ! ! ! ! Karokobe! River Liro Goya Iamba Larding ! ! Mede ! Lasu! Gwaja ! ! Gaderu Kuio ! !!! ! Morsak ! Kuriju ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Payawa ! ! ! Warcha Danga Libago Yaribe ! ! !New Lasu Kobwa Yaribe ! Lire ! ! Konugi ! ! Marjo Kemi Lakitala ! Opari ! ! ! ! Kansuk ! ! Adala Monga! Gaderu ! Shukoli Kerepi Gokiri ! Kwotio Ribuga ! Kakorodo ! ! ! ! ! Limb! i ! ! ! ! ! Tekakomi Ombasi ! Lilige ! Litoba Magwi ! Atepi ! Yari ! ! ! Kajo-Keji ! ! Kolowa Kajo-k! eji ! ! ! ! Mekr !" ! ! Laropi Goja Lui Lujula Mondi ! ! Bala ! ! Pageri Adusha Yari ! Kenyiba " ! ! ! Laiba! Nyigo! Ulako ! !! ! Ajio ! Mesika Kagwa Kejiko Loguduba ! ! Keriti ! ! ! ! ! Liggi ! Loa Odulubo Jumbo Manga!lotore Logu Loloreji ! ! ! !! Kuduri ! ! ! ! ! Bori Panyumae Liv!olo Buri Wudabi ! ! ! ! Lutyeol ! Pogu ! ! ! Gruguru Awe DEMOCRATIC ! ! Kanga Kinyiba ! ! ! Panyume East ! Mijare ! ! ! ! ! ! Godo Gu! lumbi ! ! Morobo Pomoju Aswa REPUBLIC " Jolimo ! ! Geili ! ! ! ! ! ! Langba ! ! River Karua Jalei ! ! Aribo Bu!ri Nyei Morobo ! ! ! ! Bamurye Liego ! ! ! ! OF CONGO ! Ripi Apalla ! ! ! ! Boara Nimule National Park Gelle Eseb!i ! ! Panyana ! Yondu !Rodoba ! Marobo Nimule " ! ! Kimba Dudulabe ! Olupi ! UGANDA Mugale Kaya ! Legends: ^!Country Capital UNDSS Access Constraint Sudan ! State Capitals <all other values> " Larger Towns Force Protection South " Ethiopia Towns MOSS Compliance Central Sudan African ! Big Villages International Boundaries Republic ! Small Villages ¯ N Democratic Uganda N ° ° 3 Lakes/Marshland 0 12.5 25 50 Republic of Congo 3 Kilometers Kenya 30°E 31°E 32°E Creation Date: 19 September 2016 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/south-sudan *Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined. **Final status of Abyei region is not yet determined. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Sudan Country Portfolio
    South Sudan Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 2013. USADF currently U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Foundation for manages a portfolio of 9 projects and one Cooperative Agreement. Tom Coogan, Regional Director Youth Initiative Total active commitment is $737,000. Regional Director Albino Gaw Dar, Director Country Strategy: The program focuses on food security and Email: [email protected] Tel: +211 955 413 090 export-oriented products. Email: [email protected] Grantee Duration Value Summary Kanybek General Trading and 2015-2018 $98,772 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize Milling) Investment Company Ltd. Location: Mugali, Eastern Equatoria State 4155-SSD Summary: The project funds will be used to build Kanybek’s capacity in business and financial management. The funds will also build technical capacity by providing training in sustainable agriculture and establishing a small milling facility to process raw maize into maize flour. Kajo Keji Lulu Works 2015-2018 $99,068 Sector: Manufacturing (Shea Butter) Multipurpose Cooperative Location: Kajo Keji County, Central Equatoria State Society (LWMCS) Summary: The project funds will be used to develop LWMCS’s capacity in financial and 4162-SSD business management, and to improve its production capacity by establishing a shea nut purchase fund and purchasing an oil expeller and related equipment to produce grade A shea butter for export. Amimbaru Paste Processing 2015-2018 $97,523 Sector: Agro-Processing (Peanut Paste) Cooperative Society (APP) Location: Loa in the Pageri Administrative Area, Eastern Equatoria State 4227-SSD Summary: The project funds will be used to improve the business and financial management of APP through a series of trainings and the hiring of a management team.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit to Terekeka [Oct 2020]
    Visit to Terekeka and St Stephen’s School, South Sudan – 17th – 18th March 2020 Report by Mike Quinlan Introduction Following my participation in a SOMA (Sharing of Ministries Abroad) Mission to the Internal Province of Jonglei from 7th to 16th March, I was able to make a short visit to Terekeka and to St Stephen’s School escorted by the Bishop of Terekeka, Rt Rev Paul Moji Fajala. Bp Paul met me at my hotel in Juba and drove me to Terekeka on the morning of Tuesday 17th March. We visited St Stephen’s School and I also saw some of the other sights of Terekeka (mainly boats on the bank of the Nile). Bp Paul also took me to see his house in Terekeka. After a night at a comfortable hotel, which had electricity and a fan in the evening, Bp Paul drove me back to Juba on the morning of Wednesday 18th March. I was privileged to be taken to meet the Primate of the Episcopal Church of South Sudan (ECSS), Most Rev Justin Badi Arama at his office. ABp Justin is also the chair of SOMA’s International Council. Bp Paul also took me to his house in Juba, where I met his wife, Edina, and had lunch before he took me to the airport to catch my flight back to UK. Terekeka is a small town about 75km north of Juba on the west bank of the White Nile. It takes about two and a half hours to drive there from Juba on a dirt road that becomes very difficult during the rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009
    IOM Tracking of Spontaneous Returns Project Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Background....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. En-route Tracking............................................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Area of Return Tracking................................................................................................................... 6 4. Capacity Building of SSRRC and VRRC......................................................................................... 6 5. Total Estimated Number of Returns ................................................................................................. 8 6. Analysis of Area of Return - Cumulative Data, February 2007 to June 2009................................ 10 6.1. Total
    [Show full text]
  • 1 AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P. O
    AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P. O. Box 3243 Telephone: +251 11 551 7700 / +251 11 518 25 58/ Ext 2558 Website: http://www.au.int/en/auciss Original: English FINAL REPORT OF THE AFRICAN UNION COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON SOUTH SUDAN ADDIS ABABA 15 OCTOBER 2014 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER I ..................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER II .................................................................................................................. 34 INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH SUDAN .............................................................................. 34 CHAPTER III ............................................................................................................... 110 EXAMINATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND OTHER ABUSES DURING THE CONFLICT: ACCOUNTABILITY ......................................................................... 111 CHAPTER IV ............................................................................................................... 233 ISSUES ON HEALING AND RECONCILIATION .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Needs and Agency Conflict: a Case Study of Kajo Keji County, Sudan
    African Studies Quarterly | Volume 11, Issue 1 | Fall 2009 Local Needs and Agency Conflict: A Case Study of Kajo Keji County, Sudan RANDALL FEGLEY Abstract: During Southern Sudan’s second period of civil war, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) provided almost all of the region’s public services and greatly influenced local administration. Refugee movements, inadequate infrastructures, food shortages, accountability issues, disputes and other difficulties overwhelmed both the agencies and newly developed civil authorities. Blurred distinctions between political and humanitarian activities resulted, as demonstrated in a controversy surrounding a 2004 distribution of relief food in Central Equatoria State. Based on analysis of documents, correspondence and interviews, this case study of Kajo Keji reveals many of the challenges posed by NGO activity in Southern Sudan and other countries emerging from long-term instability. Given recurrent criticisms of NGOs in war-torn areas of Africa, agency operations must be appropriately geared to affected populations and scrutinized by governments, donors, recipients and the media. A Critique of NGO Operations Once seen as unquestionably noble, humanitarian agencies have been subject to much criticism in the last 30 years.1 This has been particularly evident in the Horn of Africa. Drawing on experience in Ethiopia, Hancock depicted agencies as bureaucracies more intent on keeping themselves going than helping the poor.2 Noting that aid often allowed despots to maintain power, enrich themselves and escape responsibility, he criticized their tendency for big, wasteful projects using expensive experts who bypass local concerns and wisdom and do not speak local languages. He accused their personnel of being lazy, over-paid, under-educated and living in luxury amid their impoverished clients.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency Type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 06| Date: 16– 31 March 2021
    South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 06| Date: 16– 31 March 2021 KEY FIGURES COVID-19 IPC PHASE 5 10 281 113 135545 9 835 108 000 6 5 939 8.3 M 2.3 M confirmed deaths Tests recoveries People Counties consultations People in Need of South Sudanese cases performed targeted conducted Humanitarian Refugees in Assistance neighboring countries HIGHLIGHTS 1.6M 1.4M Internally Malnourished Children • A cumulative of 10 281 COVID-19 confirmed cases and 113 deaths (case fatality Displaced rate of 1.1%) have been reported in South Sudan since the onset of the outbreak. • 292 healthcare workers have been confirmed for COVID 19 since the start of the outbreak on 5 April 2020. 125K 483K • South Sudan’s COVID-19 vaccination drive kicked off on 6 April 2021 with health Persons living in Malnourished Women PoC1 workers receiving their first dose of the Astra Zeneca vaccine in Juba. • WHO has graded the humanitarian emergency occasioned by the severe food insecurity as a Grade 2 event that will require additional resources and support from the regional and headquarters for an adequate response. 77 5.82M • WHO delivered 164 interagency health kits (can support 227 000 people), 84 Stabilization Severely Food Insecure Centers pneumonia kits, 10 severe acute malnutrition with medical complication (SAM/MC) kits, and 21 cholera investigation kits have been delivered to the responding partners in the six priority IPC 5 counties. • Five confirmed and 27 suspected rubella cases have been line-listed in Tambura where rubella virus transmission is going on 121 Children under one year vaccinated 066 with oral polio vaccine (20%) Initial numbers of children vaccinated 962 158 against measles Counties with confirmed measles 00 outbreaks in 2021 PoC1 s sites with confirmed measles 00 outbreaks in 2021 Counties with malaria cases South Sudan rolled out the COVID-19 vaccine on 6 April 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’S Equatorias WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’s Equatorias WATCH “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’s Equatorias Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35065 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2017 ISBN: 978-1-6231-35065 “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’s Equatorias Map .................................................................................................................................... I Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Village Assessment Survey Morobo County
    Village Assessment Survey COUNTY ATLAS 2013 Morobo County Central Equatoria State Village Assessment Survey The Village Assessment Survey (VAS) has been used by IOM since 2007 and is a comprehensive data source for South Sudan that provides detailed information on access to basic services, infra- structure and other key indicators essential to informing the development of efficient reintegra- tion programmes. The most recent VAS represents IOM’s largest effort to date encompassing 30 priority counties comprising of 871 bomas, 197 payams, 468 health facilities, and 1,277 primary schools. There was a particular emphasis on assessing payams outside state capitals, where com- paratively fewer comprehensive assessments have been carried out. IOM conducted the assess- ment in priority counties where an estimated 72% of the returnee population (based on esti- mates as of 2012) has resettled. The county atlas provides spatial data at the boma level and should be used in conjunction with the VAS county profile. Four (4) Counties Assessed Planning Map and Dashboard..…………Page 1 WASH Section…………..………...Page 14 - 20 General Section…………...……...Page 2 - 5 Natural Source of Water……...……….…..Page 14 Main Ethnicities and Languages.………...Page 2 Water Point and Physical Accessibility….…Page 15 Infrastructure and Services……...............Page 3 Water Management & Conflict....….………Page 16 Land Ownership and Settlement Type ….Page 4 WASH Education...….……………….…….Page 17 Returnee Land Allocation Status..……...Page 5 Latrine Type and Use...………....………….Page 18 Livelihood
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)
    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) he first integrated water resource management (IWRM) project of its kind in South Sudan, Water Water for Eastern for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) was launched in Components 2013 as part of the broader bilateral water Tprogramme funded through the Dutch Multiannual Equatoria (W4EE) Strategic Plan for South Sudan (2012–2015). W4EE focuses on three interrelated From the very beginning, W4EE was planned as a pilot components: IWRM programme in the Torit and Kapoeta States of The role of integrated water resource manage- Eastern Equatoria focusing on holistic management of the ment in fostering resilience, delivering economic Kenneti catchment, conflict-sensitive oversight of water Component 1: Integrated water resource management of the development, improving health, and promoting for productive use such as livestock and farming, and Kenneti catchment and surrounds peace in a long-term process. improved access to safe drinking water as well as sanitati- on and hygiene. The goal has always been to replicate key Component 2: Conflict-sensitive management of water for learnings and best practice in other parts of South Sudan. productive use contributes to increased, sustained productivity, value addition in agriculture, horticulture, and livestock The Kenneti catchment is very important to the Eastern Equatoria region for economic, social, and biodiversity reasons. The river has hydropower potential, supports the Component 3: Safely managed and climate-resilient drinking livelihoods of thousands of households, and the surroun- water services and improved sanitation and hygiene are available, ding area hosts a national park with forests and wetlands operated and maintained in a sustainable manner. as well as wild animals and migratory birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Return and Reintegration of Sudanese Refugees to Southern Sudan
    Return and Reintegration of Sudanese Refugees to Southern Sudan REVISED SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL January 2004 – December 2005 Home beckons for these Sudanese refugees in Uganda. © UNHCR I. INTRODUCTION period up to 31 December 2004. The estimated funding requirements for planned activities during Decades of armed conflict in southern Sudan January – December 2005 are USD 60 million, have resulted in over 500,000 Sudanese fleeing thereby bringing the total two–year budget to USD into neighbouring countries of Uganda, Ethiopia, 89.9 million. UNHCR will reflect these revised Kenya, the Democratic Republic of the Congo project needs in the 2004 Inter-agency (DRC), Central African Republic (CAR) and Egypt. Consolidated Appeal for the Sudan Assistance The conflict also internally displaced about four Programme (ASAP). million persons. With the funds being requested, it will become In 2002, renewed peace talks launched in possible to strengthen UNHCR’s present capacity Machakos, Kenya, under the auspices of the to support the planned repatriation and Inter-Governmental Authority on Development reintegration activities in southern Sudan. In view (IGAD), resulted in the Machakos Protocol which of the total absence of basic infrastructure, such provided a framework for the cessation of as schools, hospitals and other public service hostilities between the Government of Sudan and facilities, UNHCR must work, more than ever, very the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army closely with all UN/other agencies with expertise (SPLM/A). This initiative created a momentum for in addressing the enormous needs of this complex both parties to engage in a sustainable peace and challenging operation. process. With the recent signing on 26 May 2004 between II.
    [Show full text]