Southern Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca Australis)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) Prepared by: Amina Price, Rick Stoffels, Kyle Weatherman, Rebekah O’Keefe, Warren Müller Final Report May 2016 MDFRC Publication 102 MY00164 ‐ Final Report Edited.Docx 1 Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) Final Report prepared for Murray Local Land Services by The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre. Murray Local Land Services PO Box 797 Albury NSW 2640 Ph: (02) 6051 2200; Fax: (02) 6051 2222 This report was prepared by The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre (MDFRC). The aim of the MDFRC is to provide the scientific knowledge necessary for the management and sustained utilisation of the Murray–Darling Basin water resources. The MDFRC is a joint venture between La Trobe University and CSIRO. For further information contact: Amina Price The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre PO Box 821 Wodonga VIC 3689 Ph: (02) 6024 9650 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mdfrc.org.au Enquiries: [email protected] Report Citation: Price AE, Stoffels RJ, Weatherman KA, O’Keefe R, Müller W (2016) Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis). Final Report prepared for Murray Local Land Services by The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre, MDFRC Publication 102/2016, May, 26pp. Cover Image: Southern pygmy perch utilising artificial macrophyte habitat Photographer: Kyle Weatherman Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) i Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication represents the opinion of the author only. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this publication is accurate, the author and MDFRC do not accept any liability for any loss or damage howsoever arising whether in contract, tort or otherwise which may be incurred by any person as a result of any reliance or use of any statement in this publication. The author and MDFRC do not give any warranties in relation to the accuracy, completeness and up to date status of the information in this publication. Where legislation implies any condition or warranty which cannot be excluded restricted or modified such condition or warranty shall be deemed to be included provided that the author’s and MDFRC’s liability for a breach of such term condition or warranty is, at the option of MDFRC, limited to the supply of the services again or the cost of supplying the services again. Copyright in this publication remains with the Commonwealth and State. No part may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the Commonwealth and State. Document history and status Version Reviewed by Approved by Revision type Date Issued Draft May 2016 Tara Pitman, MLLS Amina Price External Trish Bowen, MLLS Luke Pearce, NSW DPI Draft Nathan Ning Amina Price Copy Edit Distribution of copies Version Quantity Issued to Draft 1 x Word Tara Pitman, MLLS Final 1 x PDF Tara Pitman, MLLS Filename and path: Projects/Murray CMA/644‐Southern Pygmy Perch/KE/Final Report/MY00164 Final Report Draft Authors: Amina Price, Rick Stoffels, Kyle Weatherman, Rebekah O’Keefe, Warren Müller Author affiliations: The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre, CSIRO and La Trobe University Project Manager: Amina Price Client: Murray Local Land Services Project Title: Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis). Document Version: Final Project Number: M/BUS/644 Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) ii Contract Number: MY00164 Acknowledgements: This work was funded by Murray Local Land Services (MLLS) with support from the Australian Government and its National Landcare Programme and in‐kind contributions from MDFRC. We thank Simon Mom for assisting in the completion of several habitat selection trials; Slade Allen‐Ankins for assisting in fish maintenance in the holding tanks; Lee Baumgartner for contributions to the development of the project and advice and assistance during initial phases of the project and Luke Pearce for his input throughout the project in his capacity as a steering committee member. The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre offices are located on the land of the Latje Latje and Wiradjuri peoples. We undertake work throughout the Murray–Darling Basin and acknowledge the traditional owners of this land and water. We pay respect to Elders past, present and future. Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) iii Contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Project objectives and outcomes .............................................................................................................. 4 2 Materials and methods .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Species description .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Southern pygmy perch ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Redfin perch ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Fish collection and accommodation .......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Habitat preference .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Metabolism experiment ............................................................................................................................ 8 2.5 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 10 2.5.1 Habitat preference .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.5.2 Metabolism ..................................................................................................................................... 11 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Habitat preference .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Metabolism .............................................................................................................................................. 12 4 Discussion...................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Macrophytes appear to be a key habitat component for Southern pygmy perch .................................. 13 4.2 Predator avoidance is strongly habitat related ....................................................................................... 14 References ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Appendix A: Literature review: the role of structural habitat for Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis).................................................................................................................................................... 18 Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) iv List of figures Figure 1. Maps showing the location of Southern pygmy perch (green circles) and Redfin perch (red circles) collection sites. (a) Victoria, (b) Castle Creek at Gooram Hall near Euroa, and (c) Lake Moodemere near Rutherglen. Map created using ESRI ArcMap 10.2. Spatial data sourced from Victorian Government Data Directory website (http://www.data.vic.gov.au). ................................................ 6 Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the aerial view of the habitat preference tank used for behavioural trials. The barrier between the inner and outer compartments was transparent. Dashed lines delineate four quadrants within which habitat types can be setup. Small circles within the outer compartment indicate positions of four heaters. (b) Photo of the habitat preference tank setup with three habitat types: macrophytes, woody debris and open. Maximum volume of tank filled to top: 760 L. Volume of the outer compartment with a water height of 40 cm: 435 L. Volume of the inner compartment with water height 40 cm: 80 L. ................................................................................... 7 Figure 3. Diagram of the computerised intermittent‐flow respirometry apparatus. The flush circuit provided respirometers with fresh water from the ambient tank, whereas the recirculation circuit recirculated water within the respirometers. The housing unit that held the fibre‐optic DO (dissolved oxygen) sensors against the glass chambers is not shown