Fish Monitoring Across Regional Catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fish Monitoring Across Regional Catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region 2019 Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 David W. Schmarr and Leigh Thwaites SARDI Publication No. F2018/000217-2 SARDI Research Report Series No. 1055 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 March 2020 Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 Project David W. Schmarr and Leigh Thwaites SARDI Publication No. F2018/000217-2 SARDI Research Report Series No. 1055 March 2020 II Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 This publication may be cited as: Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020). Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2018/000217-2. SARDI Research Report Series No 1055. 31pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5415 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Director, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability and currency or otherwise. SARDI and its employees expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Use of the information and data contained in this report is at the user’s sole risk. If users rely on the information they are responsible for ensuring by independent verification its accuracy, currency or completeness. The SARDI Report Series is an Administrative Report Series which has not been reviewed outside the department and is not considered peer-reviewed literature. Material presented in these Administrative Reports may later be published in formal peer-reviewed scientific literature © 2020 SARDI This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. SARDI Publication No. F2018/000217-2 SARDI Research Report Series No. 1055 Author(s): David W. Schmarr and Leigh Thwaites Reviewer(s): Kate Frahn (SARDI) and Kristian Peters (DEW) Approved by: A/Prof. Qifeng Ye Science Leader – Inland Waters & Catchment Ecology Signed: Date: 30 March 2020 Distribution: AMLRNRMB, DEW, SAASC Library, Parliamentary Library, State Library and National Library Circulation: Public Domain III Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................... V LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................... VI ACRONYMS.................................................................................................................................. VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 5 2. METHODS ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Study site selection........................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Water quality measurements.......................................................................................... 10 2.3. Fish sampling methodology............................................................................................ 10 3. RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1. General results ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2. Site Health Assessment ................................................................................................. 14 4. DISCUSSION......................................................................................................................... 15 4.1. VWASP sites .................................................................................................................. 15 4.2. Southern pygmy perch sites ........................................................................................... 19 4.3. Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 21 5. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 22 6. APPENDIX A ......................................................................................................................... 24 7. APPENDIX B ......................................................................................................................... 30 IV Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of fish monitoring sites (in yellow) surveyed across the WMLR in autumn 2019. Sites marked blue are southern pygmy perch monitoring sites. ............................................................. 8 Figure 2. Location of fish monitoring sites in the Inman and Hindmarsh catchments surveyed in autumn 2019. Longterm monitoring sites marked yellow and southern pygmy perch exploratory sites marked blue. ................................................................................................................................................. 9 V Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Total catch of native (green) and invasive (red) fish species at sites in the WMLR fish condition study. ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Table 2. BCG scores for the sites in the WMLR fish condition study (I = Historically documented, sensitive, long-lived, or regionally endemic taxa, II = Sensitive-Rare Taxa, III = Sensitive Common Taxa, V = Tolerant taxa, VI = Non-native or intentionally introduced taxa, VII = Organism and population condition, IX = Spatial and temporal extent of detrimental effects, X = Ecosystem connectivity).14 Table 3. Comparison of BCG scores over time.*sites compared with similar site nearby in catchment. ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 VI Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 ACRONYMS AMLR Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges AMLRNRMB Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resource Management Board BCG Biological condition gradient CPUE Catch per unit of effort DEW Department for Environment and Water DEWNR Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources DO Dissolved oxygen FHI Fish health index GIS Geographic information system GWAP Goyder Water Allocation Planning MDBC Murray Darling Basin Commission MLR Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Natural Resource Management PIRSA Primary Industries and Regions South Australia PWRA Prescribed water resource area SARDI South Australian Research and Development Institute TL Total length VWASP Verification of Water Allocation Science Project WMLR Western Mount Lofty Ranges WAP Water Allocation Planning VII Schmarr, D.W. and Thwaites, L. (2020) Fish monitoring across regional catchments of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was funded by the Natural Resources Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges (Natural Resources AMLR) under the Western Mount Lofty Ranges Fish Community Monitoring Project. Site selection was assisted by Dr Kristian Peters and Dr Douglas Green (AMLRNRMB/DEW). Our thanks go to all the community members who allowed us access
Recommended publications
  • Action Statement No.134
    Action statement No.134 Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Yarra Pygmy Perch Nannoperca obscura © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover photo: Tarmo Raadik Compiled by: Daniel Stoessel ISBN: 978-1-74146-670-6 (pdf) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136 186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677, email www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Action Statement No. 134 Yarra Pygmy Perch Nannoperca obscura Description The Yarra Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca obscura) fragmented and characterised by moderate levels is a small perch-like member of the family of genetic differentiation between sites, implying Percichthyidae that attains a total length of 75 mm poor dispersal ability (Hammer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Condition Monitoring 2009-2010
    Assessing Obligate Habitat of Threatened Pygmy Perches in Lake Alexandrina Report to the Murray–Darling Basin Authority and the South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Scotte Wedderburn, Jason Nicol and Russell Shiel June 2017 © The University of Adelaide and the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the Murray–Darling Basin Authority logo, photographs and presented data, all material presented in this document is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/). For the avoidance of any doubt, this licence only applies to the material set out in this document. The details of the licence are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided) as is the full legal code for the CC BY 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode). MDBA’s preference is that this publication be attributed (and any material sourced from it) using the following: Publication title: Assessing Obligate Habitat of Threatened Pygmy Perches in Lake Alexandrina Source: Licensed from the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence The contents of this publication do not purport to represent the position of the Commonwealth of Australia or the MDBA in any way and are presented for the purpose of informing and stimulating discussion for improved management of Basin's natural resources. To the extent permitted by law, the copyright holders (including its employees and consultants) exclude all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this report (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Pygmy Perch Nannoperca Australis
    Southern Pygmy Perch Nannoperca australis November 2013 Primefact 190 Second Edition Fisheries Ecosystems Unit, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute Illustration by Jack Hannan Introduction Description The Southern Pygmy Perch was once widely The Southern Pygmy Perch is a small fish, distributed throughout the Lachlan, growing to 65 – 85 mm in length. It has a small Murrumbidgee and Murray River systems, as well mouth reaching to just below the eye, and a as coastal streams in South Australia, Victoria, rounded tail. north-eastern Tasmania and King and Flinders Individuals vary greatly in colour depending on Islands in Bass Strait. However, there have been local habitat and other environmental conditions. large-scale reductions in its range, particularly in Colouration has been observed to vary from pale inland regions. cream to green-brown, with paler colouration on The Southern Pygmy Perch is listed as an the belly. Individuals may also have irregular endangered species in NSW. There are heavy markings on their sides including dark spots or penalties for harming, possessing, buying or longitudinal bands. selling them or for harming their habitat (see Breeding males display brighter colours, with the ‘Legal implications’). dorsal, caudal and anal fins becoming bright red with black edges, and with the pelvic fins and region around the vent turning black. Southern Pygmy Perch - Nannoperca australis Figure 2: Historical and current known distribution of Southern Pygmy Perch in NSW. Habitat and ecology • The Southern Pygmy Perch is found in well- • Loss or modification of floodplain wetland vegetated, slow-flowing or still waters habitats by flood mitigation works, such as including streams, lakes, billabongs and other levees and wetland drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca Australis)
    Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) Prepared by: Amina Price, Rick Stoffels, Kyle Weatherman, Rebekah O’Keefe, Warren Müller Final Report May 2016 MDFRC Publication 102 MY00164 ‐ Final Report Edited.Docx 1 Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) Final Report prepared for Murray Local Land Services by The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre. Murray Local Land Services PO Box 797 Albury NSW 2640 Ph: (02) 6051 2200; Fax: (02) 6051 2222 This report was prepared by The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre (MDFRC). The aim of the MDFRC is to provide the scientific knowledge necessary for the management and sustained utilisation of the Murray–Darling Basin water resources. The MDFRC is a joint venture between La Trobe University and CSIRO. For further information contact: Amina Price The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre PO Box 821 Wodonga VIC 3689 Ph: (02) 6024 9650 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mdfrc.org.au Enquiries: [email protected] Report Citation: Price AE, Stoffels RJ, Weatherman KA, O’Keefe R, Müller W (2016) Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis). Final Report prepared for Murray Local Land Services by The Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre, MDFRC Publication 102/2016, May, 26pp. Cover Image: Southern pygmy perch utilising artificial macrophyte habitat Photographer: Kyle Weatherman Structural habitat selection by Southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) i Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication represents the opinion of the author only. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this publication is accurate, the author and MDFRC do not accept any liability for any loss or damage howsoever arising whether in contract, tort or otherwise which may be incurred by any person as a result of any reliance or use of any statement in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance and Resilience of Murray-Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance
    Resistance and Resilience of Murray- Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance Dale McNeil1, Susan Gehrig1 and Clayton Sharpe2 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000406-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 602 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 April 2013 Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority - Native Fish Strategy Project MD/1086 “Ecosystem Resilience and the Role of Refugia for Native Fish Communities & Populations” McNeil et. al. 2013 Drought and Native Fish Resilience Resistance and Resilience of Murray- Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority - Native Fish Strategy Project MD/1086 “Ecosystem Resilience and the Role of Refugia for Native Fish Communities & Populations” Dale McNeil1, Susan Gehrig1 and Clayton Sharpe2 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000406-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 602 April 2013 Page | ii McNeil et. al. 2013 Drought and Native Fish Resilience This Publication may be cited as: McNeil, D. G., Gehrig, S. L. and Sharpe, C. P. (2013). Resistance and Resilience of Murray-Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance. Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority - Native Fish Strategy Project MD/1086 ―Ecosystem Resilience and the Role of Refugia for Native Fish Communities & Populations‖. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000406-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 602. 143pp. Front Cover Images – Lake Brewster in the Lower Lachlan River catchment, Murray-Darling Basin during extended period of zero inflows, 2007. Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii), olive perchlet (Ambassis agassizii) and golden perch (Macquaria ambigua) from the, lower Lachlan River near Lake Brewster, 2007 (all images - Dale McNeil).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment
    DWLBC REPORT The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment 2003/19 The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment Kim Teoh Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation June 2006 Report DWLBC 2003/19 Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au Disclaimer Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. © Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2007 This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Chief Executive, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • Deficiencies in Our Understanding of the Hydro-Ecology of Several Native Australian Fish: a Rapid Evidence Synthesis
    Marine and Freshwater Research, 2018, 69, 1208–1221 © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Supplementary material Deficiencies in our understanding of the hydro-ecology of several native Australian fish: a rapid evidence synthesis Kimberly A. MillerA,D, Roser Casas-MuletB,A, Siobhan C. de LittleA, Michael J. StewardsonA, Wayne M. KosterC and J. Angus WebbA,E ADepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia. BWater Research Institute, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK. CArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. DPresent address: Healesville Sanctuary, Badger Creek Road, Healesville, Vic. 3777, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email address: [email protected] Page 1 of 30 Marine and Freshwater Research © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Table S1. All papers located by standardised searches and following citation trails for the two rapid evidence assessments All papers are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a reading of the title and abstract. Those deemed relevant on the first screen are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a full assessment of the reference.The table contains incomplete citation details for a number of irrelevant papers. The information provided is as returned from the different evidence databases. Given that these references were not relevant to our review, we have not sought out the full citation details. Source Reference Relevance Relevance (based on title (after reading and abstract) full text) Pygmy perch & carp gudgeons Search hit Anon (1998) Soy protein-based formulas: recommendations for use in infant feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Threatened Fish Populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert, South Australia
    An assessment of threatened fish populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert, South Australia Scotte Wedderburn Report to the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and the Murray–Darling Basin Authority June 2014 i ii This report may be cited as: Wedderburn, S. (2014). An assessment of threatened fish populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert, South Australia. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 30. © The University of Adelaide and The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR) With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the Murray–Darling Basin Authority logo, all photographs, graphics and trademarks, this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au It is preferred that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Title: An assessment of threatened fish populations in Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert, South Australia. Source: Licensed from The University of Adelaide under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. Authors: Scotte Wedderburn. This information is provided in good faith but to the extent permitted by law, the (Recipient) and the Commonwealth exclude all liability for adverse consequences arising directly or indirectly from using any information or material contained within this publication. Cover Image: Dunn Lagoon, southern pygmy perch, Murray hardyhead, Yarra pygmy perch. Photographers: Scotte Wedderburn and Michael Hammer. Australian Government Departments and Agencies are required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) to ensure that information and services can be accessed by people with disabilities. If you encounter accessibility difficulties or the information you require is in a format that you cannot access, please contact us.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Reports
    Water quality Information Sheet Aquatic ecosystem condition reports 2011 panel assessment of creeks and rivers in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM region Issued September 2012 EPA984/12: This information sheet describes the outcome of the panel assessment of creeks and rivers in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges, NRM region based on monitoring data collected in 2011. Introduction The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) coordinates a monitoring, evaluation and reporting (MER) program on the aquatic ecosystem condition of South Australian creeks and rivers. This MER program is designed to meet several objectives: • Providing a statewide monitoring framework for creeks and rivers that revolves through the NRM regions with sufficient frequency to allow for State of the Environment Reporting purposes. • Describing aquatic ecosystem condition for broad general public understanding. • Identifying the key pressures and management responses to those pressures. • Providing a useful reporting format that can support environmental decision making within government, community and industry. This information sheet provides a summary of the scientific work used in assessing monitoring data from creeks and rivers. Aquatic ecosystem science is not always rigid and precise; it is often open to different interpretations in several respects. Therefore, the EPA has decided that the best way to assess the condition of streams is through an expert panel deliberation that uses a consistent descriptive modelling approach. The panel members comprised an environmental consultant, a biologist from the biomonitoring team at the Australian Water Quality Centre (AWQC), and two biologists from the EPA (the authors of this assessment). All have at least 10 years experience in monitoring and assessing a range of streams across South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Hydraulic Head, Chloride and Electrical Conductivity Data to Distinguish Between Mountain-Front and Mountain-Block Recharge to Basin Aquifers
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1629–1648, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1629-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Using hydraulic head, chloride and electrical conductivity data to distinguish between mountain-front and mountain-block recharge to basin aquifers Etienne Bresciani1,2, Roger H. Cranswick1,3, Eddie W. Banks1, Jordi Batlle-Aguilar1,4, Peter G. Cook1, and Okke Batelaan1 1National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, School of the Environment, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia 2Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea 3Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 4Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA Correspondence: Etienne Bresciani (etienne.bresciani@flinders.edu.au) Received: 8 June 2017 – Discussion started: 31 July 2017 Revised: 10 January 2018 – Accepted: 29 January 2018 – Published: 2 March 2018 Abstract. Numerous basin aquifers in arid and semi-arid data indicate that not only the Quaternary aquifers but also regions of the world derive a significant portion of their the deeper Tertiary aquifers are recharged through MFR and recharge from adjacent mountains. Such recharge can ef- not MBR. It is expected that this finding will have a signif- fectively occur through either stream infiltration in the icant impact on the management of water resources in the mountain-front zone (mountain-front recharge, MFR) or sub- region. This study demonstrates the relevance of using hy- surface flow from the mountain (mountain-block recharge, draulic head, chloride and EC data to distinguish between MBR).
    [Show full text]
  • Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region
    Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region Dale McNeil, David Schmarr and Rupert Mathwin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 590 SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 December 2011 Survey Report for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region Dale McNeil, David Survey Report for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Schmarr and Rupert Mathwin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 590 December 2011 Board This Publication may be cited as: McNeil, D.G, Schmarr, D.W and Mathwin, R (2011). Condition of Freshwater Fish Communities in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Management Region. Report to the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2011/000502-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 590. 65pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area 2018-19 Water Resources Assessment
    Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area 2018-19 water resources assessment Department for Environment and Water November, 2020 DEW Technical report 2020/23 Department for Environment and Water Government of South Australia November 2020 81-95 Waymouth St, ADELAIDE SA 5000 Telephone +61 (8) 8463 6946 Facsimile +61 (8) 8463 6999 ABN 36702093234 www.environment.sa.gov.au Disclaimer The Department for Environment and Water and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department for Environment and Water and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, other material or devices protected by Aboriginal rights or a trademark, and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, the content of this document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence. All other rights are reserved. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, through the Department for Environment and Water 2020 ISBN 978-1-925964-74-5 Preferred way to cite this publication DEW (2020). Barossa Prescribed Water Resources Area 2018-19 water resources assessment, DEW Technical report 2020/23, Government of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water, Adelaide. Download
    [Show full text]