The Critical Fish Habitat Project: Reintroductions of Threatened Fish Species in the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Critical Fish Habitat Project: Reintroductions of threatened fish species in the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth region 2011–13 C. Bice, N. Whiterod, P. Wilson, B. Zampatti and M. Hammer SARDI Publication No. F2012/000348-2 SARDI Research Report Series No. 697 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 July 2013 The Critical Fish Habitat Project: Reintroductions of threatened fish species in the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth region in 2011–13 C. Bice, N. Whiterod, P. Wilson, B. Zampatti and M. Hammer SARDI Publication No. F2012/000348-2 SARDI Research Report Series No. 697 July 2013 This publication may be cited as: Bice, C., Whiterod, N., Wilson, P., Zampatti, B. and Hammer, M. (2013). The Critical Fish Habitat Project: Reintroductions of threatened fish species in the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth region 2011–2013. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2012/000348-2. SARDI Research Report Series No 697. 67pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The SARDI Report Series is an Administrative Report Series which has not been reviewed outside the department and is not considered peer-reviewed literature. Material presented in these Administrative Reports may later be published in formal peer-reviewed scientific literature. © 2013 SARDI This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. Printed in Adelaide: July 2013 SARDI Publication No. F2012/000348-2 SARDI Research Report Series No. 697 Author(s): C. Bice, N. Whiterod, P. Wilson, B. Zampatti and M. Hammer Reviewer(s): J. Fredberg and G. Giatas Approved by: Q. Ye Science Leader – Inland Waters & Catchment Ecology Signed: Date: 12 July 2013 Distribution: SA Department of Environment Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), SAASC Library, University of Adelaide Library, Parliamentary Library, State Library and National Library Circulation: Public Domain ii Bice, Whiterod, Wilson, Zampatti and Hammer (2013) Critical Fish Habitat Project 2011–2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. vi Executive summary ................................................................................................................. vii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 9 2. Methods ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Selection of potential reintroduction sites ..................................................................... 12 2.2 Suitability of potential reintroduction sites ................................................................... 14 2.3 Specific site assessment ................................................................................................ 17 2.4 Reintroduction methodology ......................................................................................... 18 3. Results ................................................................................................................................. 24 3.1 Site assessment .............................................................................................................. 24 3.2 Reintroduction summary ............................................................................................... 32 3.3 Post-reintroduction monitoring/recaptures .................................................................... 34 4. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 43 4.1 Status of the threatened species in the region ............................................................... 43 4.2 Lessons learnt - refinement of the reintroduction framework ....................................... 45 4.3 The way forward - future conservation of threatened fish species ................................ 47 6. Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 56 iii Bice, Whiterod, Wilson, Zampatti and Hammer (2013) Critical Fish Habitat Project 2011–2013 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Summary of potential (black) and actual (green) reintroduction sites for southern purple-spotted gudgeon, Yarra pygmy perch and Murray hardyhead in the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth (CLLMM) region in 2012/13. Murray Barrages are indicated by bold lines. Site numbers are cross referenced in Table 2. Note: no southern pygmy perch were available for release in 2012/13. ...................................................... 14 Figure 2. Fish sampling in the Hunters Creek (upstream of Denver Rd causeway) site in spring 2012. .................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 3. Soft-release enclosure at the Mundoo Channel east site, a Murray hardyhead reintroduction site. .......................................................................................................... 21 Figure 4. a) Southern pygmy perch undergoing calcein marking. Fish are in the salt bath prior to immersion in the calcein solution (next tub up) and finally bathing in a recovery tub, and b) southern pygmy perch (top) and southern purple-spotted gudgeon (bottom) as viewed under ultraviolet light 1 day post-staining. ......................................................... 22 Figure 5. a) Emergent vegetation (Triglochin procerum) at the Finniss River southern purple- spotted gudgeon reintroduction site, b) Murray hardyhead release site at Mundoo Channel east, c) submerged aquatic vegetation (Myriophyllum sp.) at the Hunters Creek downstream Denver Rd site and d) Shadows Lagoon – Yarra pygmy perch reintroduction site. .......................................................................................................... 32 Figure 6. Yarra pygmy perch sampled from the Streamer Drain during spring 2012 – the first individual sampled from the CLLMM region (and MDB) since 2007. .......................... 35 Figure 7. Length-frequency distributions and corresponding mean fluorescence (± standard error) against length plots for all Yarra pygmy perch sampled in spring 2012 (a, b) and autumn 2013 (c, d). Dashed line represents the fluorescence reading deemed to indicate a calcein mark. Green ellipses indicate likely young-of-year individuals. ..................... 36 Figure 8. a) Likely YOY southern pygmy perch sampled from b) the ‘natural channel connected to Hunters Creek’ site in spring 2012. ........................................................... 37 Figure 9. Length-frequency distributions and corresponding mean fluorescence (± standard error) against length plots for all southern pygmy perch sampled in autumn 2012 (a, b), spring 2012 (c, d) and autumn 2013 (e, f). Dashed line represents the fluorescence reading deemed to indicate a calcein mark. Green ellipses indicate likely young-of-year individuals....................................................................................................................... 38 Figure 10. Remnant ‘wild’ Murray hardyhead (top) with congeneric unspecked hardyhead (Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum fulvus; bottom) sampled from the Finniss River Junction in autumn 2012. ................................................................................................ 39 Figure 11. Length-frequency distributions and corresponding mean fluorescence (± standard error) against length plots for Murray hardyhead sampled in autumn 2012 (a), spring 2012 (b, c) and autumn 2013 (d, e). Dashed line represents the fluorescence reading deemed to indicate a calcein mark. No fluorescence readings were taken in autumn 2012. Green ellipses indicate likely young-of-year individuals. .................................... 40 Figure 12. Length-frequency distributions and corresponding mean fluorescence (± standard error) against length plots for all southern purple-spotted gudgeon sampled in autumn 2012 (a, b), spring 2012 (c, d) and autumn 2013 (e, f). Dashed line represents the fluorescence reading deemed to indicate a calcein mark. Green ellipses indicate potential young-of-year