emr_418.fm Page 196 Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:34 PM

RESEARCH

REPORT doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00418.x EffectsBlackwell Publishing Asia of flooding on recruitment and dispersal of the Southern Pygmy Perch ( australis) at a floodplain wetland

By Zeb Tonkin, Alison J. King and John Mahoney

ZebECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENTTonkin & RESTORATION and VOL 9 NO 3 DECEMBERDr 2008Alison King are freshwater Summary With limited evidence linking Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin fish species ecologists, and John Mahoney is a senior technical and flooding, this study assessed annual variation in abundance and recruitment levels of a officer with the Arthur Rylah Institute for Environ- small-bodied, threatened floodplain species, the Southern Pygmy Perch ( Nannoperca australis), mental Research, (Department of Sustainability in floodplain habitats (creeks, lakes and wetlands) in the Barmah-Millewa Forest, Murray and Environment, 123 Brown St., Heidelberg, River, Australia. Spring and summer sampling over a 5-year period encompassed large hydro- Vic. 3089, Australia; Tel.: +61 3 9450 8600; Fax: logical variation, including 1 year of extended floodplain inundation which was largely driven +61 3 9450 8799; Email: [email protected], by an environmental water release, and 2 years of severe regional drought. Recruitment and alison.king@dse. vic.gov.au, john.mahoney@dse. dispersal of Southern Pygmy Perch significantly increased during the floodplain inundation vic.gov.au). This work is part of a project funded event compared with the other examined years. This study provides valuable support for an by the Murray-Darling Basin Commission which environmental water allocation benefiting a native species, and explores the link between looks at assessing fish breeding and recruitment in flooding and its advantages to native fish. This suggests that the reduced flooding frequency response to environmental flow management. and magnitude as a result of river regulation may well be a major contributing factor in the species’ decline in the Murray-Darling Basin. Key words: environmental water allocation, floodplain inundation, freshwater fish, Murray- Darling Basin.

provision of environmental water to cur- an annual EWA which has been used three Introduction rently over-allocated or overused systems times since its inception in 1993 (King owland river fish communities are to environmentally sustainable levels et al. 2007). It was not until the latest of L thought to rely on regular floodplain and improve environmental management these events, the 2005 EWA, that an intense inundations which provide a range of practices is a key objective of the National fish monitoring programme was under- benefits such as spawning cues and an Water Initiative (NWI 2005). Although taken to assess the response of the forest’s abundance of food and habitat (Junk these EWAs are being increasingly targeted fish community to such an event. King et al. 1989; Bayley 1991). The flood pulse at improving native fish populations, there et al. (in press) documented increases in concept is often extrapolated to Australia’s are unfortunately only a few examples of a spawning and/or recruitment of larger, Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) fish com- positive response by fish to an environ- native riverine fish species Golden Perch munity (e.g. the ‘flood recruitment model’, mental flow (Poff et al. 2003; Arthington (Macquaria ambigua), Silver Perch Harris & Gehrke 1994) despite limited et al. 2006; King et al. in press). (Bidyanus bidyanus), Murray Cod evidence of any benefits floodplain The Barmah-Millewa Forest is a 70 000- (Maccullochella peelii peelii) and Trout inundation has had on any MDB species ha highly complex floodplain wetland Cod (Maccullochella macquariensis) (Humphries et al. 1999; King et al. 2003; system located on the Murray River in during this EWA-driven flood year. As part Mallen-Cooper & Stuart 2003; Graham & south-eastern Australia’s MDB. The forest is of this programme, this paper assesses Harris 2005). With most rivers in the MDB one of the six recognized icon sites under annual variation in abundance and recruit- now regulated, there has been a significant the Murray-Darling Basin Commission’s ment of a small bodied, cryptic floodplain loss of low to medium level floods, which is ‘Living Murray Initiative’ (COAG 2004), and species, the Southern Pygmy Perch believed to be a major contributing factor is internationally recognized as an import- (Nannoperca australis). to the decline in the abundance and ant wetland under the Ramsar Convention The Southern Pygmy Perch is the most distribution of the Basin’s native fish fauna (Ward 2005). The forest’s hydrology has widespread of the six nannopercid species, (MDBC 2004). As a consequence, much been severely altered as a result of the occurring from coastal south-west Western attention has been given to the recovery of regulation of the Murray River, and poses a Australia to southern Queensland (Hum- a more natural flow regime as a restoration major threat to the ecological values of the phries 1995). Although relatively common strategy, particularly through environ- forest (Ward 2005). In an attempt to return in coastal Victoria, the Southern Pygmy mental water allocations (EWA; Poff et al. a more natural hydrological regime to the Perch is patchily distributed in northern 1997; Arthington et al. 2006). Indeed, the forest, the Barmah-Millewa Forest receives Victoria and is now listed as Endangered in

196 ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION VOL 9 NO 3 DECMEBER 2008 © 2008 Ecological Society of Australia

emr_418.fm Page 197 Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:34 PM

RESEARCH REPORT

New South Wales (established under part conditions resulted in the complete drying possessed clear banding. Although daily 7a of the NSW Fisheries Management Act of many of the floodplain habitat sites increment deposition has not been vali- 1994 ) and South Australia (SA Fisheries Act towards the end of the study. dated for the species, daily deposition has 1982; Action Plan for South Australian Sampling was conducted using modified been confirmed for another member of the Freshwater Fishes 2007). The species quatrefoil light traps (Floyd et al. 1984; genus, Nannoperca oxleyana (J. Knight, reaches a maximum size of 85 mm Secor et al. 1992), which are a useful unpubl. data 2008). Furthermore, back (although rarely >65 mm) and prefers passive technique for collecting fish from a calculation of increment counts did corre- slow flowing or still waters containing range of meso-habitat types and depths. spond to the length frequency distributions dense habitat such as aquatic vegetation Light traps were set on dusk with a yellow and approximate birthdates of the species or complex woody debris and is therefore 12-h light stick, and were retrieved as early presented by other authors (e.g. Humphries commonly associated with floodplain as possible the next day. Active sampling 1995), suggesting that increments are environments such as wetlands and billa- was also conducted in all habitat types deposited on a daily basis for the species. bongs (see also Kuiter et al. 1996; Linter- using the Sweep Net Electrofishing (SNE) Sagittal otoliths were removed with the aid mans 2007). The species is able to tolerate method (King & Crook 2002). The SNE of a stereo microscope and mounted in a broad range of temperatures and method is a modified standard backpack thermoplastic cement (proximal face down). extremely low dissolved oxygen levels electrofishing unit (Smith-Root Model 12, Otoliths were then polished to the level of (McNeil & Closs 2007), which is typical NE Salmon Creek Ave., Vancouver, WA, USA), the primordium across the sagittal plain of such environments. Submerged and with a 15-cm diameter anode ring, and using 3 μm lapping film and 0.5 μm alumina aquatic vegetation are also the preferred fitted with a moulded plastic rectangular slurry. Using a compound microscope spawning site of the species where females frame (25 × 30 × 2 cm) with an attached (400–1000 × magnification) fitted with a randomly disperse their small demersal eggs 250 μm mesh sampling net. A replicate SNE digital camera and the image analysis (Llewellyn 1974). Unsurprisingly, habitat sample involved approaching the selected system IMAGEPRO EXPRESS (version 5.0.1.26, alteration such as loss of aquatic vegetation habitat, activating the anode and moving Media Cybernetics Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA) and seasonal flow changes/reductions are at a constant speed in a forward zigzag the number of increments from the first listed as possible reasons for the species’ motion for 20 s of electrofishing time (see major increment outside the primordium decline (Lintermans 2007). The aim of this King et al. 2007). Five replicate samples of to the edge of the otolith was counted three paper was to assess annual variation in both light trap and SNE were taken at each times, after which the mean ring count was abundance and recruitment levels of site (only three replicates were taken in determined (see Sweatman & Kohler 1991). this species in floodplain habitats of the smaller wetland habitats), throughout the The mean ring count for each fish was then Barmah-Millewa Forest over a 5-year period duration of the study. The 2006/2007 and used as the estimate for daily age; however, encompassing large variation in hydrological 2007/2008 seasons consisted of extremely given the timing of deposition for the first conditions including an environmental low water levels, resulting in a number of increment is unknown, ages have been watering event. the wetland sites drying. presented as ‘estimated age’ throughout. After collection, fish were preserved No attempt was made to assess the age in 95% ethanol and later measured for structure of older fish given the difficulties Methods standard length (Ls – nearest 0.1 mm) and of annuli interpretation reported by As part of a larger fish monitoring pro- weight (nearest 0.001 g). These measure- Humphries (1995). gramme (see King et al. 2007), sampling ments were performed after a minimum of Data analysis was conducted at 11 floodplain sites which 10 days to allow shrinkage associated with encompassed four forest creeks, two large preservation to have stabilized (Fey & Hare To assess annual variation in Southern lakes and five smaller wetlands. Sampling 2005). As no larvae were collected for the Pygmy Perch abundance, the total number was performed on a monthly basis from species over the entire 5-year period, of fish collected each month from all sites mid-September to the end of February over limited conclusions could be drawn on using both gear types was divided by the a 5-year period (2003/2004, 2004/2005, spawning of the species. However, by total number of replicates to give a standard 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008). using a combination of length frequency catch per-unit effort (CPUE). This was used The 5-year study period encompassed a distributions and otolith microstructure to correct for minor differences in sampl- range of hydrological conditions resulting analysis of the smaller size classes of ing effort over the 5-year period due to < in contrasting differences in floodplain fish 30 mm Ls (assumed to be juveniles factors such as gear malfunction or loss of inundation between years. This included according to Lintermans 2007), estimates sites due to drying. Monthly CPUE data brief minor floodplain inundation during of daily age (and therefore spawning time) were log-transformed to achieve normal early spring for the first two years, major and mean growth rates was available. distribution and tested for annual differences extended spring/summer floodplain Unlike difficulties of annuli interpreta- in abundance using a one-way analysis of inundation encompassing the EWA event tion reported for the species (Humphries variance (ANOVA). To assess annual variation during the middle year (2005/2006) and no 1995), the microstructure of sagittal otoliths in distribution, monthly presence/absence flooding in the final two years. The latter of early juvenile Southern Pygmy Perch data for each site were log-transformed to

© 2008 Ecological Society of Australia ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION VOL 9 NO 3 DECMEBER 2008 197

emr_418.fm Page 198 Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:34 PM

RESEARCH REPORT

Fig. 1b). No fish were collected in 2007/ 2008, primarily due to the majority of wetland sites being completely dry for the entire sample period after a prolonged period of no floodplain inundation (Fig. 1a). In three of the 5 years, there were two distinct size classes of Southern Pygmy Perch captured, adults and early juveniles (Fig. 2). Using a combination of daily age estimation and length frequency distri- butions, we were able to determine that the smaller size class of fish (<30 mm) captured from November until February were young-of-year. More of these juvenile fish were collected in 2005/2006 (n = 21) compared to the other years (Fig. 1b). Daily age estimation indicated that regardless of year, all fish were spawned in October. Length frequency distributions also suggest this spawning time (Fig. 2). Early juvenile fish collected in 2005/2006 were larger than similar-aged fish collected from 2004/2005 (Fig. 3). A comparison of mean growth rates indicated early juvenile fish collected in 2005/2006 had significantly higher mean growth rates (0.352 ± 0.010 mm/day, n = 21) than those collected in 2004/2005 (0.209 ± 0.029 mm/day, n = 9) (F = 2, 51.79, P < 0.001). The single early juvenile fish captured in 2006/2007 had a mean growth rate of 0.207 mm/day. Figure 1. Annual variation in (a) the number of days of floodplain inundation; (b) numbers of Southern Pygmy Perch adults (black) and juveniles (grey) with the associated number of sites (triangles) in which the species was present and; (c) mean monthly catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) of Discussion Southern Pygmy Perch during each year of the study. With limited evidence linking MDB fish achieve normal distribution and tested for species and floodplain inundation, the Results annual differences using a one-way ANOVA. broad applicability of the flood-pulse Although small sample sizes and restricted Over the 5-year period, 96 individual concept and subsequent models (e.g. size ranges did not permit the development Southern Pygmy Perch were collected from Harris & Gehrke 1994) has recently of a growth model for the population (see creeks and wetlands in the BMF. Over half come under question for many species Campana & Jones 1992), length at estimated of these fish (n = 50) were collected in (Humphries et al. 1999; King et al. 2003; age comparisons was used to estimate mean 2005/2006, when the maximum number of Graham & Harris 2005). The results of individual growth rates for early juvenile days of floodplain inundation occurred this study show the highest numbers of fish using the following formula: (Fig. 1a,b). There was a significant differ- Southern Pygmy Perch were collected ence in the monthly CPUE of fish between in 2005/2006 (the year of prolonged = ANOVA = Gc (Ls – 3.45)/Ac sampling years (one-way , F 3, 3.97, spring/summer floodplain inundation), P < 0.05; Fig. 1c), with a greater number of with a high proportion of fish being

where Gc is the mean daily growth rate Southern Pygmy Perch collected in 2005/ juveniles. Many fish were also collected in at capture (millimetres/day), Ls is the 2006 and 2006/2007 than 2003/2004, the following year (2006/2007), however, standard length at capture, 3.45 mm is the 2004/2005 and 2007/2008, respectively. catches were almost exclusively made up length at hatch as determined by Llewellyn Southern Pygmy Perch were also recorded of adult fish, most likely as a result of the

(1974) and Ac is the estimated age at at significantly more sites in 2005/2006 and increased recruitment from the 2005/2006 capture (days). Mean juvenile growth rates 2006/2007 (five sites), than the other 3 flood season. Additionally, the only other were log transformed and tested for annual years (one site in 2003/2004 and 2004/ year where a high number of juvenile fish differences using a one-way ANOVA. 2005) of the study (F = 3, 4.33, P < 0.05; were captured was 2004/2005, which

198 ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION VOL 9 NO 3 DECMEBER 2008 © 2008 Ecological Society of Australia

emr_418.fm Page 199 Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:34 PM

RESEARCH REPORT

Figure 2. Southern Pygmy Perch length frequency histograms for each month sampled in 2004/2005 (n = 17), 2005/06 (n = 50) and 2006/2007 (n = 28). Note: 2003/2004, 2007/2008 not included, as very few fish were collected.

encompassed the next longest period of fish were recruited within the floodplain eggs or larvae were captured, the increased floodplain inundation for the study. habitats of the BMF and not sourced from number of recruits during years of greater Taken together, these results show that upstream given King et al. (2007) reported floodplain inundation suggests the second recruitment of Southern Pygmy Perch was no captures of the species in the main river mechanism described by Harris and greatest during years where prolonged channel after 3 years of sampling. Gehrke (1994) and Junk et al. (1989), may spring/summer floodplain inundation Harris and Gehrke (1994) proposed that have occurred. Furthermore, estimated periods occur, as predicted by the flood- floods could enhance recruitment of mean growth rates of juvenile fish (derived pulse concept and flood-recruitment Australian native freshwater fish either by from length at age data) suggest the models. spawning in direct response to floods or by extended floodplain inundation during It must be noted that strong conclusions indirectly increasing the survival of young 2005/2006 provided better conditions are limited given the restricted number of by providing suitable food and habitat to facilitate early growth in this species. years for comparison and the lack of in- resources on the inundated floodplain. Although we have not been able to com- dependent control sites which make it Although we are unable to comment on ment on the amount of spawning of difficult to ascribe causation from correlative whether there was an increase in spawning Southern Pygmy Perch, it is possible that data. We can however, be confident that activity of Southern Pygmy Perch, as no the higher water levels which inundated

© 2008 Ecological Society of Australia ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION VOL 9 NO 3 DECMEBER 2008 199

emr_418.fm Page 200 Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:34 PM

RESEARCH REPORT

Rourke 2008). Indeed, emergency manage- ment measures including targeted watering and relocation from drying pools to more permanent refuge areas have already occurred during the 2007/2008 season. This is by no means a long-term solution since Humphries (1995) reported the age structure of a Tasmanian population of Southern Pygmy Perch to be dominated by 0+ fish, with very few individuals living more than 1 year. Given that after 3 years of sampling, King et al. (2007) reported no captures of the species in the main river channel, the local BMF population of Southern Pygmy Perch is under serious threat of extinction, unless appropriately Figure 3. Juvenile Southern Pygmy Perch estimated age (days) at length (Ls) data for 2004/2005 (crosses), 2005/2006 (black diamonds) and 2006/2007 (square). n = 21, 9 and 1, respectively. timed flooding can trigger successful recruitment and dispersal in the coming seasons. vast areas of vegetation during the 2005/ In addition to the increased recruitment Such a flood-reliant life-history strategy 2006 years, may have benefited the spawn- levels recorded during the 2005/2006 years, appears to be quite risky for a short-lived, ing mechanism of the species. Llewellyn Southern Pygmy Perch were recorded MDB species, particularly given the huge (1974) reported that while flooding was from the greatest number of sites during hydrological variations that characterize not necessary as a spawning stimulus, the high flow year and the following year, Australian floodplain rivers. Additionally, heavily weeded slow flowing areas are the which suggests that this flood event also river regulation in the MDB has resulted in preferred spawning areas of the species. facilitated the dispersal of Southern Pygmy a reduction in the frequency and magni- Another member of the genus, Nanno- Perch throughout the Forest. This result tude of flooding events (MDBC 2004), and perca oxleyana, has also been reported to highlights the importance of flooding as a hence, is likely to have contributed to the preferentially spawn on submerged vegeta- mechanism of dispersal and recolonization species’ decline and current conservation tion in aquaria (Leggett 1990; Knight et al. for this floodplain species, which is a com- status. Although the Barmah-Millewa Forest 2007). mon strategy employed by species inhabit- currently receives a substantially reduced Results of this study indicated that ing these floodplain environments (e.g. frequency and magnitude of flooding regardless of year, all of the juvenile fish col- Winemiller et al. 2000; Granado-Lorencio events than pre-river regulation, the forest lected in the BMF were spawned around et al. 2005). Of course, the increased still receives floods that cover 70% of its October. Humphries (1995) also reported number of sites fish were recorded from floodplain in 37% of years, and small October spawning for a Tasmanian popula- may also have been a result of increased localized flooding events occur more tion of Southern Pygmy Perch, document- recruitment by sparse local populations often (although they are mostly outside the ing female gonadosomatic indices peaking not detected by earlier sampling, rather natural seasonal inundation period for the in October and, like the present study, most than dispersal from other sites. Although period) (MDBC 2006). This fairly regular juveniles occurred in December. Llewellyn flooding may provide new potential habi- flooding frequency may help to explain (1974) also reported the species breeding tats, high productivity and an input of new why the Barmah-Millewa Forest has during September and October during a recruits, extreme dry periods can result in maintained a population of the species, pond study in southern New South Wales. catastrophic mortality (Winemiller et al. and further highlights the fragility and This suggests that spawning times are 2000). The last two years of this study were importance of this complex wetland similar between populations; despite hydro- some of the area’s driest periods in history, system as a key area for the conservation of logical, latitudinal and habitat differences. and resulted in two consecutive years of no Southern Pygmy Perch in the MDB. Interestingly, this consistently restricted floodplain inundation and a large propor- The extended floodplain inundation spawning period for Southern Pygmy Perch tion of aquatic floodplain habitats com- during 2005/2006 included the largest contrasts markedly with the known pro- pletely dried out. This ultimately led to the EWA used to date in Australia (513 GL). tracted spawning period of the northern absence of the species from samples in the Although the EWA resulted in other posi- coastal species N. oxleyana, which has final year of sampling at all of the previously tive ecological outcomes, this research recently been documented spawning from sampled sites. Additional surveys of the demonstrates that flooding, and the use September until April in Northern New area have recorded low numbers of large of the EWA, increased recruitment and South Wales and Queensland (Knight et al. adults (no juveniles) in some of the few dispersal of a species of conservation 2007). remnant pools in the forest (Tonkin & significance, the Southern Pygmy Perch.

200 ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION VOL 9 NO 3 DECMEBER 2008 © 2008 Ecological Society of Australia

emr_418.fm Page 201 Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:34 PM

RESEARCH REPORT

This response from a small-bodied flood- Stevenson and S. E. Campana), pp. 73–100. Kuiter R. H., Humphries P. and Arthington A. H. plain species adds further evidence to the Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and (1996) Family Nannoperca: Pygmy perches. In: Aquatic Sciences, Ottawa, Canada. Freshwater Fishes of South Eastern Australia response of fish to the Barmah-Millewa COAG (2004) Intergovernmental Agreement on (ed. R. M. McDowall), pp. 168–175. Reed EWA, as presented by King et al. (in press), Addressing Water Overallocation and Achieving Books, Sydney, NSW. which documented increases in spawning Environmental Objectives in the Murray- Leggett R. (1990) A fish in danger – Nannoperca Darling Basin. Council of Australian Governments. oxleyana. Fishes of Sahul 6, 247–249. and/or recruitment of four larger, native Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Lintermans M. (2007) Fishes of the Murray-Darling riverine species during this environmental Canberra, ACT. Available from URL: http:// Basin: An Introductory Guide. Murray-Darling watering event. With recent questioning of www.coag.gov.au/coag_meeting_outcomes/ Basin Commision, Canberra, ACT. 2004-06-25/index.cfm#nwi. [Accessed Octo- Llewellyn L. C. (1974) Spawning, development the relationship between flooding and ber 2008]. and distribution of the Southern Pygmy Perch Australian freshwater fish (e.g. Humphries Fey D. P. and Hare J. A. (2005) Length correction Nannoperca australis Günther from inland et al. 1999; King et al. 2003; Mallen- for larval and early-juvenile Atlantic menhaden waters in Eastern Australia. Australian Journal (Brevoortia tyrannus) after preservation in of Marine and Freshwater Research 25, 121– Cooper & Stuart 2003; Graham & Harris alcohol. Fishery Bulletin 103, 725–727. 149. 2005), the use of EWA’s as a means to Floyd K. B., Hoyt R. B. and Timbrook S. (1984) Mallen-Cooper M. and Stuart I. G. (2003) Age, restore and enhance its freshwater fisheries Chronology of appearance and habitat parti- growth and non-flood recruitment of two tioning by stream larval fishes. Transactions of potamodromous fishes in a large semi-arid/ has received much attention, particularly the American Fisheries Society 113, 217–223. temperate river system. River Research and when the MDB is experiencing one of Graham R. and Harris J. (2005) Floodplain Inunda- Applications 19, 697–719. its worst recorded droughts. Therefore, tion and Fish Dynamics in the Murray-Darling McNeil D. G. and Closs G. P. (2007) Behavioural Basin. CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Canberra, responses of a south-east Australian floodplain although strong conclusions are limited, ACT. fish community to gradual hypoxia. Freshwater this work has suggested a link between Granado-Lorencio C., Araujo Lima C. R. M. and Biology 52, 412–420. flooding and a Murray-Darling native flood- Lobón-Cerviá J. (2005) Abundance–distribution MDBC (2004) Native Fish Strategy for the Murray- relationships in fish assembly of the Amazonas Darling Basin 2003–2013. Murray-Darling Basin plain species, and has provided invaluable floodplain lakes. Ecography 28, 515–520. Commission Publication No. 25/04. MDBC, evidence of a native fish species benefiting Harris J. H. and Gehrke P. C. (1994) Modelling the Canberra, ACT. from the use of environmental water. This relationship between streamflow and popula- MDBC (2006) The Barmah-Millewa Forest Icon tion recruitment to manage freshwater fisheries. Site Environmental Management Plan 2006– research has provided much needed Agricultural Systems and Information Tech- 2007. Murray Darling Basin Commission, support for the use of managed flows for nology 6, 28–30. Canberra, ACT. the environment as a method of fish Humphries P. (1995) Life history, food and habitat NWI (2005) National Water Initiative. Australian of Southern Pygmy Perch, Nannoperca australis, Government National Water Commision, rehabilitation not only in Australia’s MDB, in the Macquarie River, . Marine and Canberra, ACT. Available from URL: http:// but in regulated floodplain rivers around Freshwater Research 46, 1159–1169. www.nwc.gov.au/www/html/117-national- the world. Humphries P., King A. J. and Koehn J. D. (1999) water-initiative.asp. [Accessed August 2008]. Fish, flows and flood plains: links between Poff N. L., Allan J. D., Bain M. B. et al. (1997) The freshwater fishes and their environment in the natural flow regime: a paradigm for river con- Murray-Darling River system, Australia. Environ- servation and restoration. Bioscience 47, Acknowledgements mental Biology of Fishes 56, 129–151. 769–784. Junk W. J., Bayley P. B. and Sparks R. E. (1989) Poff N. L., Allan J. D., Palmer M. A. et al. (2003) We thank the Murray-Darling Basin Com- The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain River flows and water wars: emerging science mission for funding and support for the systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries for environmental decision making. Frontiers in project. We would also like to thank the and Aquatic Sciences 106, 110–127. Ecology and Environment 1, 298–306. King A. J. and Crook D. A. (2002) Evaluation of a Secor D. H., Dean J. M. and Hansbarger J. (1992) Barmah-Millewa Forum for their inception sweep net electrofishing method for the Modification of the quadrefoil light trap for of the project and support, David Ramsay collection of small fish and shrimp in lotic use in hatchery ponds. The Progressive Fish for statistical advice, and Bill Dixon for his freshwater environments. Hydrobiologia 472, Culturist 54, 202–205. 223–233. Sweatman J. J. and Kohler C. C. (1991) Validation helpful comments on the draft manuscript. King A. J., Humphries P. and Lake P. S. (2003) Fish of daily otolith increments for young-of-the-year This study was carried out under the Arthur recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns white crappies. North American Journal of Rylah Institute Ethics Committee of flooding and life history characteristics. Fisheries Management 11, 499–503. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Tonkin Z. and Rourke M. (2008) Barmah-Millewa number AEC 07/08. Sciences 60, 773–786. Fish Condition Monitoring – 2008 Annual King A. J., Tonkin Z. and Mahoney J. (2007) Summary and Refuge Habitat Report. Arthur Assessing the Effectiveness of Environmental Rylah Institute for Environmental Research References Flows on Fish Recruitment in Barmah-Millewa (Department of Sustainability and Environment) Forest. Report prepared by Arthur Rylah Insti- and New South Wales Department of Primary Arthington A. H., Bunn S. E., Poff L. N. and Naiman tute for Environmental Research, DSE. MDBC Industries, Heidelberg, Vic. and Orange, NSW. R. J. (2006) The challenge of providing environ- Project No. BMF 2004.09. Ward K. A. (2005) Water management in the chang- mental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. King A. J., Tonkin Z. and Mahoney J. (in press) Environ- ing Barmah-Millewa wetlands. Proceedings of Ecological Applications 16, 1311–1318. mental flows enhance native fish spawning and the Royal Society of Victoria 117, 77–84. Bayley P. B. (1991) The flood pulse advantage recruitment in the Murray River, Australia. Rivers Winemiller K. O., Tarim S., Shoreman D. and and the restoration of river-floodplain systems. Research and Applications. Cotner J. B. (2000) Fish assemblage structure Regulated Rivers: Research and Management Knight J. T., Butler G. L., Smith P. S. and Wager R. in relation to environmental variation among 6, 75–86. N. E. (2007) Reproductive biology of the Brazos river oxbow lakes. Transactions of the Campana S. E. and Jones C. M. (1992) Analysis of endangered oxleyan pygmy perch Nannoperca American Fisheries Society 129, 451–468. otolith microstructure data. In: Otolith Micro- oxleyana Whitley. Journal of Fish Biology 71, structure Examination and Analysis (eds D. K. 1494–1511.

© 2008 Ecological Society of Australia ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION VOL 9 NO 3 DECMEBER 2008 201