Learning About Plants
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials the CD Has Photographs of Almost 90% of the Memorials Plus Information on Their Current Location
PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials The CD has photographs of almost 90% of the memorials plus information on their current location. The Memorials - listed in their pre-1970 counties: Cambridgeshire: Benwick; Coates; Stanground –Church & Lampass Lodge of Oddfellows; Thorney, Turves; Whittlesey; 1st/2nd Battalions. Cambridgeshire Regiment Huntingdonshire: Elton; Farcet; Fletton-Church, Ex-Servicemen Club, Phorpres Club, (New F) Baptist Chapel, (Old F) United Methodist Chapel; Gt Stukeley; Huntingdon-All Saints & County Police Force, Kings Ripton, Lt Stukeley, Orton Longueville, Orton Waterville, Stilton, Upwood with Gt Ravely, Waternewton, Woodston, Yaxley Lincolnshire: Barholm; Baston; Braceborough; Crowland (x2); Deeping St James; Greatford; Langtoft; Market Deeping; Tallington; Uffington; West Deeping: Wilsthorpe; Northamptonshire: Barnwell; Collyweston; Easton on the Hill; Fotheringhay; Lutton; Tansor; Yarwell City of Peterborough: Albert Place Boys School; All Saints; Baker Perkins, Broadway Cemetery; Boer War; Book of Remembrance; Boy Scouts; Central Park (Our Jimmy); Co-op; Deacon School; Eastfield Cemetery; General Post Office; Hand & Heart Public House; Jedburghs; King’s School: Longthorpe; Memorial Hospital (Roll of Honour); Museum; Newark; Park Rd Chapel; Paston; St Barnabas; St John the Baptist (Church & Boys School); St Mark’s; St Mary’s; St Paul’s; St Peter’s College; Salvation Army; Special Constabulary; Wentworth St Chapel; Werrington; Westgate Chapel Soke of Peterborough: Bainton with Ashton; Barnack; Castor; Etton; Eye; Glinton; Helpston; Marholm; Maxey with Deeping Gate; Newborough with Borough Fen; Northborough; Peakirk; Thornhaugh; Ufford; Wittering. Pearl Assurance National Memorial (relocated from London to Lynch Wood, Peterborough) Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough (£10) This CD contains a record and index of all the readable gravestones in the Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough. -
Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 61
JOURNAL OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ ORTHAMPTONSHIRE CONTENTS Page NPAST AND PRESENT Notes and News . 5 Number 61 (2008) Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk Avril Lumley Prior . 7 The Peterborough Chronicles Nicholas Karn and Edmund King . 17 Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c. 1490-1500 Alan Rogers . 30 Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 Colin Davenport . 42 George London at Castle Ashby Peter McKay . 56 Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape Jenny Burt . 64 Politics in Late Victorian and Edwardian Northamptonshire John Adams . 78 The Wakerley Calciner Furnaces Jack Rodney Laundon . 86 Joan Wake and the Northamptonshire Record Society Sir Hereward Wake . 88 The Northamptonshire Reference Database Barry and Liz Taylor . 94 Book Reviews . 95 Obituary Notices . 102 Index . 103 Cover illustration: Courteenhall House built in 1791 by Sir William Wake, 9th Baronet. Samuel Saxon, architect, and Humphry Repton, landscape designer. Number 61 2008 £3.50 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT PAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Northamptonshire Record Society NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT 2008 Number 61 CONTENTS Page Notes and News . 5 Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk . 7 Avril Lumley Prior The Peterborough Chronicles . 17 Nicholas Karn and Edmund King Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c.1490-1500 . 30 Alan Rogers Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 . 42 Colin Davenport George London at Castle Ashby . 56 Peter McKay Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape . -
Executive Summary and Overview by the Chief Executive
Appendix 1: Proposed Vivacity Business Plan 24.2.1 Executive Summary and Overview By The Chief Executive The next five years is a story with two themes. The first is one of business as usual. Given the nature of our work this is not surprising. The day to day work of Vivacity remains unchanged- lending almost 1 million items through our libraries; teaching 1500 children a week to swim; providing 1million people the opportunity to take part in sport; approaching 100,000 people learning about their local heritage and 55,000 theatre tickets sold each year. The second theme is one of change brought about by opportunities. Most significantly: Development of Hampton Leisure Facilities - It is probable that the management of two new leisure facilities will be offered to Vivacity in the summer of 2013. This will generate fantastic new opportunities for people to take part and increase our turnover dramatically and hence make a significant contribution to our central support costs. This must be balanced by the knowledge that it will bring tangible risks- the business model is primarily based on the selling of gym memberships in other words a non- fixed income. It is crucial that we approach the opportunity presented by these facilities with business focus rather than being attracted by the opportunity of growth for its own sake. If these projects move forward they will become the main focus of effort in 2013 and 2014. Must Farm Finds - The long term future for the Must Farm find is far from clear. What is known is that Flag Fen offers up a medium and perhaps longer term opportunity for the preservation and presentation of these fantastic artefacts. -
Peterboroughcaav2 New2017.Indd
6.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES 6.01 The new public realm works to Cathedral Square, St John’s Square, Cowgate, Long Causeway and Bridge Street and architectural lighting for aesthetic effect have brought about significant enhancement, creating attractive places. Westgate Broadway and Midgate (adjacent to the Conservation Area) are programmed for improvement under the Public Realm Strategy in the next couple of years. 6.02 The pedestrianisation of the principal shopping streets within the city centre has had a major positive impact on the ability to enjoy the historic environment and spaces within these parts of the Conservation Area. Elsewhere, although it can create a lively bustle and give animation to the streets, traffic more often detracts from the character and setting of the Conservation Area. On-street car parking is visually intrusive along Cowgate and the busy bus and taxi route of Broadway and Westgate is distracting and gives rise to unattractive and cluttering guardrails and traffic signs. 6.03 Vacancy at ground floor level is not at present a concern throughout the Conservation Area, although there are a small number of vacant retail units. Vacancy appears to be a greater problem at upper floor level above ground floor retail units. This presents a threat to the long-term survival of such buildings through a lack of regular maintenance and investment. There are few long- term vacant historic buildings within the Conservation Area, with two notable exceptions being Nos. 51 and 55 Priestgate. 6.04 The impact of Bourges Boulevard is severe and has a profound detrimental impact across the periphery of the Conservation Area, with severe negative impacts on Cowgate, Priestgate and Bridge Street. -
The London Gazette, December 19, 1882
6452 THE LONDON GAZETTE, DECEMBER 19, 1882. the county of Northampton, as lies within the daries, that is to say, the drain known as Old following boundaries, that is. to say,. Harlestone Pepper Lake as far as the Boat on- the - north, Firs on the north, the Dallington and Harlestone the said drain to Powder Blue Bridge on the bridle-road on the east, Hensmans-lane, Porters- east, the said drain to Old House Bridge on the lane, and Sand-lane on the west, and Duston south, and Speechley's Drove and main-road as village on the south. far as Old House Bridge on the west. (11.) The whole of the parish of Hazclbeech, (4.) At Peakirk, in the Soke of Peter- in the county of Northampton. borough, comprised within the following boun- (12.).So much of the parish of Sulby, in the daries, that is to say, the Great Northern ioop- county of Northampton, as lies within the line from Fox Cover Crossing to Park House following boundaries, that is to say, the road Bridge on the east and south-east, the bridle- leading from the turnpike-road to Sibbertoft as road leading to Werrington as far as Fox Cover far as the coach-road leading to Sulby Hall on Crossing on the south-west, and Halfmoon bank the north, the reservoir at Sulby on the south, as far as the road leading from North Fen to the reservoir and the road leading from Welford Peakirk on the north. Bridge to the Sibbertoft turn on the west, and (5.) At Peterborough Common, in the Soke the coach-road to Sulby Hall on the east. -
Nassaburgh Militia Lists 1762
3 NASSABURGH MILITIA LISTS 1762 EDITED BY VICTOR A. HATLEY AND BRIAN G. STATHAM INTRODUCTION Series of militia lists for Northamptonshire exist for 1762, 1771, 1774, 1777, 1781 and 1786; there are also lists, some of them undated, for many parishes from the period of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars with France. The series for 1777 was reproduced by the Society in 1973, but unfortunately the lists from Nassaburgh Hundred (Soke of Peterborough) for that date are missing. The only surviving lists from Nassaburgh are those for 1762, and these are reproduced in this volume. 1 The English militia was a force raised for the defence of the realm against invasion or rebellion. It was not liable for service overseas. Under the Militia Act of 1662 all owners of property were charged with the provision of horses, arms and men, in accordance with the value of their property, but this liability was removed from the individual to the parish by the Militia Act of 1757, itself modified by a series of subsequent acts. Each county had now to contribute a quota of men for militia service, 640 in the case of Northamptonshire; elsewhere the quota ranged from 1,600 each for Devonshire and Middlesex, 1,240 for the West Riding of Yorkshire and 1,200 for Lincolnshire, down to 240 each for Monn1outh and West morland, and only 120 for tiny Rutland. Responsibility for raising the militia and providing it with officers lay with the lord lieutenant of each county and his deputies. Liability to serve in the militia rested on able-bodied men between the ages of 18 and 45 years. -
BAA Peterborough Conference Flyer
BRITISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION PPPETERBOROUGHPETERBOROUGH CATHEDRAL AND THE SOKE OF PETERBOROUGH ANNUAL CONFERENCE 10 ––– 14 July 2015 CALL FOR PAPERS he British Archaeological Association’s 2015 annual conference will be held at T Peterborough. The focus of the conference will be the architecture, art and archaeology throughout the Soke of Peterborough, especially that of Peterborough Cathedral and its precincts from the Anglo-Saxon period through the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century. Trips will include visits to the Bronze Age site Flag Fen, the Roman remains at Castor and the Anglo-Saxon tower at Barnack Church as well as many medieval buildings in the precincts and around the Soke. Other highlights include a visit to Thorpe Hall, built in the 1650s, and the remains of the early seventeenth-century Wothorpe Towers by Thomas Cecil. CALL FOR PAPERS Anyone wishing to contribute a 25 minute paper on a Roman, medieval or post-medieval topic related to Peterborough Cathedral or the architecture, art and archaeology of the Soke of Peterborough should send a 200-word abstract with title to the conference convenors Ron Baxter, Jackie Hall and Claudia Marx at [email protected]. The deadline for submissions is September 30, 20142014. ACCOMMODATION AND LECTURE THEATRE Rooms will be reserved at The Bull Hotel, Peterborough, which is located a 3-minute walk from the John Clare Theatre at which the conference lectures will be held. Both the hotel and lecture theatre are within a short walking distance of the Cathedral. RECEPTIONS AND CONFERENCE DINNER Receptions are planned at the medieval parish church of Peterborough, St John the Baptist, and the Cathedral Deanery where delegates will have opportunity to look at the eleventh-century motte in the Deanery Garden. -
The Origins of Leicestershire: Churches, Territories, and Landscape
The origins of Leicestershire: churches, territories, and landscape Graham Jones Introduction Neat parcelling-out of the landscape need In the decades since our introduction to not be Danish. Like the open fields, it may be Glanville Jones’s ‘multiple estate’ (Jones 1961) older.4 and John Blair’s minster parish (Blair 1988),1 Rather than ‘Where are the minsters?’ attempts to identify Leicestershire’s earliest better to ask ‘What territories were served by churches and pre-hundredal structures have minsters?’ Can they be identified and their mainly concentrated on area studies.2 Blair extents estimated?5 Can they be categorised? himself notes how some ‘relatively settled’ Sub-kingdoms, provinces, folk territories, and areas such as Leicestershire ‘still seem very regiones (Bassett 1993; Hooke 1998) are thin’ in their number of minsters, asking ‘whether not easily distinguished from each other and the contrast is simply in the surviving sources’ from hundreds and wapentakes. Moreover, (Blair 2005, 152, 315-6). While the national a network of minsters, monastic or secular, and regional pictures remain incomplete,3 with neatly dovetailing parochiæ, will not alone uncertainty clings to the shape of religious reveal the ancient devotional landscape. provision before and after the Augustinian Places of religious or ritual resort came in many mission, the process of Christianisation, the guises. What became Leicestershire had a extent of Danish colonisation, the impact of richly varied religious geography as this study reforms, and the emergence of the parochial shows, but we should expect it from continental network. This ramifies back and forth with evidence. In southern Germany, for example, secular matters: cultural identity, nucleation, churches were first built at fords or crossroads, manorialisation, and here the existence of hilltops, burial barrows, or springs for baptism, Leicestershire itself. -
Reflections on Some Major Lincolnshire Place-Names Part Two: Ness Wapentake to Yarborough
Reflections on some major Lincolnshire place-names Part Two: Ness wapentake to Yarborough Richard Coates This is the second half of a two-part survey, the first half of which appeared in JEPNS 40 (Coates 2008b). In contrast to the study of Lincolnshire minor names in JEPNS 39 (‘Azure Mouse, [etc.]’, Coates 2007), the focus here is on major names, defined as parish and manor names, district names in towns, and those of larger entities still. Some other names which are not conventional “minor names”, for example coastal and maritime features, are also included. The names treated appear in a single alphabetical list. The preamble to the earlier article applies to this one too, and parts of it are repeated here. Contents Introduction and apparatus 57 Typography and notation 58 A note on Scandinavian 59 Abbreviations 59 The names, treated in alphabetical order 60 Notes 95 Bibliography, references 96 Element-lists: newly-identified elements and personal names 101 Index 101 Introduction and apparatus This work is a collection of sometimes extended commentaries on names in Lincolnshire treated (i) in Kenneth Cameron’s A dictionary of Lincolnshire place-names (1998), to which, throughout, plain page-numbers in parentheses refer (e.g. 39), or (ii) in the six volumes published by November 2003 of his The place-names of Lincolnshire (PN L) which form part of the Survey of English Place-Names (1923–date), or (iii) in his article, ‘The Scandinavian 57 58 JOURNAL OF THE ENGLISH PLACE-NAME SOCIETY 41 (2009) element in minor names and field-names in north-east Lincolnshire’, published in Nomina 19 (1996). -
William Thomas Brownlow Cecil, 5Th
113 NOTES AND NEWS I T is with great sorrow that we have to record the death at Burghley House on August 6th last of the Marquess of Exeter, K.G., who, from its foundation thirty-six years ago, was the President and staunchest friend of this Society. Rarely; indeed, if ever, in the history of Northamptonshire, has there been one who g~ve himself and his great abilities so whole heartedly in the course of a long life, to the service of his neighbours, or who was so widely esteemed and beloved. A short account of his .life will be found on page 117. THE RECORD SOCIETY. The Society continues to grow and we offer a cordial welcome to the fifty new subscribers who have joined our ranks since January 1st. Our total membership is now well over six hundred. The Annual Meeting was held last June by kipd permission in that very pleasant room, the Council Chamber at the County Hall, Northampton, Mr. Ewart Marlow, M.C., Chairman of the County Council, presiding. The transaction of business was followed by a general discussion on Northamptonshire Place-Names and their pronunciation. Though some were for pronouncing all the names as now spelt, regret was expresssed at the loss of ~he traditional pronunciations (chiefly through imported railway-men and school-teachers who think they know better), and a hopeful tendency to retain and even to recapture the old ways was reported. Natives of Rothwell, we were told, now say "Rowell" ·as their grandparents did, but will not allow "foreigners" to do so until they have qualified by ten years' residence in that delectable, sturdy little town. -
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 30 NOVEMBER, 1937 MINISTRY of AGRICULTURE and Order No
7522 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 30 NOVEMBER, 1937 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND Order No. 5559. FISHERIES. (Dated 25th November, 1937.) DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACTS, 1894 TO 1937. FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE (INFECTED Notice is hereby given, in pursuance of AREAS) ORDER OF 1937 .(No. 54). Section 49 (3) of the Diseases of Animals Act, SUBJECT. 1894, that the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries has made the following Orders:— (i) Declares the Area described in the Schedule to be a Foot-and-Mouth Disease In- Order No. 5558. fected Area for the purposes of the Foot-and- (Dated 25th November, 1937.) Mouth Disease (Infected Areas Restrictions) Order of 1925, in place of the Areas described FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE (INFECTED in the First Schedule to Order No. 5553 and in AREAS) ORDER OF 1937 (No. 53). the Schedule to Order No. 5557, which shall SUBJECT. cease to be separate Foot-and-Mouth Disease Infected Areas. Contracts, as from 30th November, 1937, (ii) Revokes Orders Nos. 5553 and 5557. the Huntingdon Foot-and-Mouth Disease In- fected Area to the Area as described in the Schedule. FIRST SCHEDULE. An Area comprising: — SCHEDULE. In the county of Kent. Contracted Infected Area. The borough of Royal Tunbridge Wells. An Area comprising: — The parishes of Edenbridge, Hever, Cowden, In the county of Huntingdon. Chiddingstone, Penshurst, Leigh, Bidborough, The petty sessional division of Norman Cross. Southborough, Speldhurst, Sevenoaks Weald, The parishes of Upwood and The Raveleys Hawkhurst, so much of the parishes . of (except the former parish of Little Raveley), -
'Right Well Kept': Peterborough Abbey 1536
C) C I •- (IJ C � -�!.._ C �■- VI a.. s itJ 'Right Well Kept': - (11RISTOPI-II:'� MORRIS Peterborough Abbey 1536 - 1539 How typical was Although the reasons for and the process of dissolution in Peterborough Abbey the experience of compare closely to all other religious houses, the consequences were unique. Peterborough Peterborough received favourabletreatment and so emerged from the dissolution as Abbey in the one of six abbeys to be transformed into new cathedrals. The changes imposed on dissolution of the Peterborough were less disruptive in terms of architectural modifications, the monasteries? religious community, economic sanctions and material confiscations. In April 1536, there were more than eight hundred monasteries, abbeys, nunneries and friaries that were home to more than ten thousand religious but by April 1540 there were none left.The experience of Peterborough Abbey varies from most. Some of the smaller houses were re-established 'in perpetuity' under a new charter. However most properties were confiscated and the inhabitants swept away before being able to repay the sums borrowed in order to purchase this concession. A small group of monasteries, some sixteen in all, stood in a class by themselves by reason of their continued or revived existence in another form. They represented the only material benefitaccruing to the church fromthe great monastic confiscationand were effectively the 'sum total of the salvage effectedfrom the grea wreck' .1 Just six remained as religious establishments. One of these, Westminster, lasted only ten years as a bishopric; therefore the only genuinely 'salvaged' ones were Gloucester, Chester, Bristol, St Frideswides (later Oxford) and Peterborough.