DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) State Planning Organization The Republic of Turkey THE STUDY ON THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE EASTERN BLACK SEA REGION IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY (DOKAP) Final Report Volume V Environment August 2000 NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. RECS INTERNATIONAL INC. LIST OF REPORTS (This Volume is indicated by ) Volume I Executive Summary Volume II Master Plan Volume III Economic Sectors Volume IV Social Sectors Volume V Environment Volume VI Spatial Development and Infrastructure Volume VII Institutional Development Volume VIII Project Reports Currency Equivalents US$ 1 = 462,280 TL 1,000 TL = US$0.00216 (September, 1999) THE STUDY ON THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE EASTERN BLACK SEA REGION IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY Final Report Volume V Environment Table of Contents page CHAPTER 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS OF DOKAP REGION.............................. 1-1 1.1 Natural Conditions ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Geography....................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Mountains........................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.3 Black Sea......................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.4 Rivers and lakes............................................................................... 1-5 1.1.5 Climate ............................................................................................ 1-6 1.2 Flora and Fauna............................................................................................. 1-7 1.2.1 Significance of Turkish flora and fauna............................................. 1-7 1.2.2 Characteristics of DOKAP flora and fauna........................................ 1-9 1.3 Flora of the DOKAP Region.......................................................................... 1-9 1.3.1 Significance of DOKAP flora ........................................................... 1-9 1.3.2 Forest ecosystems............................................................................ 1-10 1.3.3 Important forest ecosystems............................................................. 1-11 1.3.4 Vegetation of the region................................................................... 1-11 1.4 Fauna of the DOKAP Region......................................................................... 1-14 1.4.1 Birds................................................................................................ 1-14 1.4.2 Mammals ......................................................................................... 1-16 1.5 Human Habitats and Environment.................................................................. 1-16 1.5.1 Air quality........................................................................................ 1-17 1.5.2 Water quality.................................................................................... 1-19 1.5.3 Organized Industrial Zones............................................................... 1-20 1.6 Marine and Coastal Environment ................................................................... 1-21 1.6.1 Marine environment ......................................................................... 1-21 1.6.2 Coastal environment......................................................................... 1-22 i CHAPTER 2 PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION....... 2-1 2.1 Institutional Arrangements for Protected Areas.............................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Ministry of Forestry ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Ministry of Environment .................................................................. 2-3 2.1.3 Ministry of Culture........................................................................... 2-4 2.1.4 Other institutions ............................................................................. 2-4 2.1.5 Role of NGOs and other institutions................................................. 2-5 2.2 Protected Areas in Turkey (National Parks System) ....................................... 2-5 2.3 Conservation Programs ................................................................................. 2-8 2.3.1 Important Bird Areas (IBA) ............................................................. 2-8 2.3.2 Other interventions by international organizations............................. 2-9 CHAPTER 3 DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SECTOR............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Issues Affecting Overall Environmental Sector of DOKAP Regional Development ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Constraints identified by National Environment Action Plan (NEAP) ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Constraints of DOKAP environmental sector.................................... 3-1 3.1.3 Goals and objectives of DOKAP environmental sector ..................... 3-5 3.1.4 Overall strategy of environmental sector........................................... 3-7 3.2 Strategy for Forest Ecosystem....................................................................... 3-10 3.2.1 Constraints....................................................................................... 3-10 3.2.2 Objectives........................................................................................ 3-15 3.2.3 Strategy ........................................................................................... 3-15 3.3 Marine Ecosystem......................................................................................... 3-23 3.3.1 Constraints....................................................................................... 3-23 3.3.2 Development objectives ................................................................... 3-24 3.3.3 Strategy ........................................................................................... 3-25 3.4 Urban Environment ....................................................................................... 3-27 3.4.1 Constraints....................................................................................... 3-27 3.4.2 Development objectives ................................................................... 3-28 3.4.3 Strategy ........................................................................................... 3-28 3.5 Rural Environment ........................................................................................ 3-31 3.5.1 Constraints....................................................................................... 3-31 3.5.2 Development objectives ................................................................... 3-32 3.5.3 Strategy ........................................................................................... 3-32 ii List of Tables Table 1.1 Principle Watersheds in the DOKAP Region.......................................... 1-6 Table 1.2 Climates of Selected Provinces.............................................................. 1-7 Table 1.3 Plant Diversity and Endemism in the Western Palaearctic....................... 1-8 Table 1.4 Examples of Domestic Plants Originated from Turkey........................... 1-9 Table 1.5 Examples of Threatened Bird Species in the DOKAP Region ................ 1-16 Table 1.6 Average Yearly SO2 Concentrations and Change at Observation Stations in the DOKAP Region ............................................................. 1-18 Table 1.7 Average Yearly Particular Concentrations and Change at Observation Stations in the DOKAP Region.......................................... 1-18 Table 1.8 Motor Vehicles in the DOKAP Region (1997) ....................................... 1-19 Table 2.1 National Park Systems in the DOKAP Region ....................................... 2-7 Table 3.1 Consequences of Managerial Constraints............................................... 3-2 Table 3.2 Characterizations on DOKAP Regional Development Scenario (Summary)............................................................................................ 3-6 Table 3.3 Comparisons of Protected Areas in the DOKAP Region ........................ 3-13 Table 3.4 Comparisons of Forest Activities and Market Value............................... 3-16 Table 3.5 Existing Gene Resources Conservation Programs in Turkey .................. 3-20 Table 3.6 Zoning in the Protected Areas ............................................................... 3-21 List of Figures Figure 1.1 Black Sea and Neighboring Countries ................................................... 1-4 Figure 1.2 Location of Old Growth Forests in Trabzon and Artvin ......................... 1-11 Figure 2.1 Organizational Arrangement of GDNPGW and Protected Lands............ 2-3 Figure 3.1 Common Goals of Environmental Sector (Image).................................. 3-7 Appendix 1 Examples of Endemic Species Found in the DOKAP Region Appendix 2 Important Forest Ecosystems in the DOKAP Region Appendix 3 Examples of Migrating Raptors Counts in the DOKAP Region Appendix 4 Sedentary and Migratory Birds Found in the DOKAP Region Appendix 5 Fauna Observed in the DOKAP Region Appendix 6 Applying Collaborative Approach to Forest Management in the DOKAP Region Appendix 7 List of Environmental Laws and Regulations iii ABBREVIATIONS AGM General Directorate of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contributions to the Moss Flora of the Caucasian Part (Artvin Province) of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2013) 37: 375-388 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1201-49 Contributions to the moss flora of the Caucasian part (Artvin Province) of Turkey 1 2, Nevzat BATAN , Turan ÖZDEMİR * 1 Maçka Vocational School, Karadeniz Technical University, 61750, Trabzon, Turkey 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey Received: 27.01.2012 Accepted: 02.10.2012 Published Online: 15.03.2013 Printed: 15.04.2013 Abstract: The moss flora of Artvin Province (Ardanuç, Şavşat, Borçka, Murgul, and Arhavi districts) in Turkey was studied between 2009 and 2011. A total of 167 moss taxa (belonging to 80 genera and 33 families) were recorded within the study area. Among these, 3 species [Dicranella schreberiana (Hedw.) Dixon, Dicranodontium asperulum (Mitt.) Broth., and Campylopus pyriformis (Schultz) Brid.] are new records from the investigated area for the moss flora of Turkey. The research area is located in the A4 and A5 squares in the grid system adopted by Henderson in 1961. In the A5 grid-square 127 taxa were recorded as new records, and 1 taxon [Anomodon longifolius (Schleich. ex Brid.) Hartm.] was recorded for the second time in Turkey. Key words: Moss, flora, Artvin Province, A4 and A5 squares, Turkey 1. Introduction 2008), Campylopus flexuosus (Hedw.) Brid. (Özdemir & The total Turkish bryoflora comprises 773 taxa (species, Uyar, 2008), Scapania paludosa (Müll. Frib.) Müll. Frib. subspecies, and varieties), including 187 genera of (Keçeli et al., 2008), Dicranum flexicaule Brid. (Uyar et Bryophyta and 175 taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties) al., 2008), Sphagnum centrale C.E.O.Jensen (Abay et al., of Marchantiophyta and Anthocerotophyta (Uyar & Çetin, 2009), Orthotrichum callistomum Fisch.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation of Piloting the Usda Guidelines in the Hazelnut Supply Chain in Turkey – Elimination of Child Labor and Application of Good Employment Practices
    EXTERNAL FINAL EVALUATION OF PILOTING THE USDA GUIDELINES IN THE HAZELNUT SUPPLY CHAIN IN TURKEY – ELIMINATION OF CHILD LABOR AND APPLICATION OF GOOD EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES FUNDED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. IL-28101-15-75-K-11 JULY 2, 2018 Final Evaluation of Piloting USDA Guidelines in the Hazelnut Industry in Turkey – Elimination of Child Labor and Application of Good Employment Practices– Final Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report describes in detail the final evaluation conducted in March 2018 of the Piloting USDA Guidelines in the Hazelnut Industry in Turkey – Elimination of Child Labor and Application of Good Employment Practices. Amy Jersild and Tuba Emiroglu, independent evaluators, conducted the evaluation in conjunction with the project team members and stakeholders. The evaluation team prepared the evaluation report according to the contract terms specified by O’Brien and Associates International, Inc. The evaluators would like to thank the companies, government officials, partner NGOs, farmers, and migrant workers and their families who offered their time and expertise throughout the evaluation. Funding for this evaluation was provided by the United States Department of Labor under Task Order number 1605DC-17-T-00100. Points of view or opinions in this evaluation report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. 1 Final Evaluation of Piloting USDA Guidelines in the Hazelnut Industry in Turkey – Elimination of Child Labor and Application of Good Employment Practices– Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Artvin/NE Turkey
    Gültekin et al. Geotherm Energy (2019) 7:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-019-0128-5 RESEARCH Open Access Conceptual model of the Şavşat (Artvin/ NE Turkey) Geothermal Field developed with hydrogeochemical, isotopic, and geophysical studies Fatma Gültekin1*, Esra Hatipoğlu Temizel1, Ali Erden Babacan2, M. Ziya Kırmacı1, Arzu Fırat Ersoy1 and B. Melih Subaşı1 *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract 1 Geological Engineering The Şavşat (Artvin, Turkey) Geothermal Field (ŞGF) is located on the northeastern Department, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, border of Turkey. This feld is characterized by thermal and mineralized springs and Turkey travertine. The temperature of the thermal water is 36 °C, whereas that of the mineral- Full list of author information ized spring in the area is approximately 11 °C. The Na–HCO –Cl-type thermal water has is available at the end of the 3 article a pH value of 6.83 and an EC value of 5731 µS/cm. The aim of this study is to character- ize the geothermal system by using geological, geophysical, and hydrogeochemical data and to determine its hydrochemical properties. A conceptual hydrogeological model is developed for the hydrogeological fow system in the ŞGF. According to the hydrogeological conceptual model created by geological, geophysical, and hydrogeo- chemical studies, the reservoir comprises volcanogenic sandstone and volcanic rocks. The cap rock for the geothermal system is composed of turbiditic deposits consisting of mudstone–siltstone–sandstone alternations. An increase in the geothermal gradient is mainly due to Pleistocene volcanic activity in the feld. The isotopic values of thermal water (δ18O, δ2H, δ3H) indicate a deeply circulating meteoric origin.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 86, 25 July 2016 2
    No. 86 25 July 2016 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html TURKISH SOCIETAL ACTORS IN THE CAUCASUS Special Editors: Andrea Weiss and Yana Zabanova ■■Introduction by the Special Editors 2 ■■Track Two Diplomacy between Armenia and Turkey: Achievements and Limitations 3 By Vahram Ter-Matevosyan, Yerevan ■■How Non-Governmental Are Civil Societal Relations Between Turkey and Azerbaijan? 6 By Hülya Demirdirek and Orhan Gafarlı, Ankara ■■Turkey’s Abkhaz Diaspora as an Intermediary Between Turkish and Abkhaz Societies 9 By Yana Zabanova, Berlin ■■Turkish Georgians: The Forgotten Diaspora, Religion and Social Ties 13 By Andrea Weiss, Berlin ■■CHRONICLE From 14 June to 19 July 2016 16 Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 86, 25 July 2016 2 Introduction by the Special Editors Turkey is an important actor in the South Caucasus in several respects: as a leading trade and investment partner, an energy hub, and a security actor. While the economic and security dimensions of Turkey’s role in the region have been amply addressed, its cross-border ties with societies in the Caucasus remain under-researched. This issue of the Cauca- sus Analytical Digest illustrates inter-societal relations between Turkey and the three South Caucasus states of Arme- nia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, as well as with the de-facto state of Abkhazia, through the prism of NGO and diaspora contacts. Although this approach is by necessity selective, each of the four articles describes an important segment of transboundary societal relations between Turkey and the Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's Black Sea Region Policy*
    * THE EUROPEAN UNION’S BLACK SEA REGION POLICY AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN KARADENİZ BÖLGESİ POLİTİKASI ПОЛИТИКА ЕВРОСОЮЗА К ЧЕРНОМОРСКОМУ РЕГИОНУ ** Assist. Prof. Dr. Haydar EFE ABSTRACT After Romania and Bulgaria entrance in to the EU, the Black Sea region has become very important for the European Union. First of all, stability and security in the Black Sea region is important for the EU. This region is also a main concern for the European Union regarding of preventing the spread of organized crime and terrorism. On the other hand, this region is an important hub for energy and transport flows for the EU. The EU is an important economic and trading partner for the Black Sea countries and makes many efforts to stimulate democratic and economic reforms and supports regional development of the whole region. In this context, “Black Sea Synergy” Programme as an EU initiative was launched in 2007, and finally in May 2009, the EU adopted the “Eastern Partnership” a plan to foster closer political and economic ties with these countries of the region. Key Words: European Union, Black Sea region, Black Sea Synergy, Eastern Partnership ÖZET Bulgaristan ve Romanya’nın AB’ye girmesinden sonra, Karadeniz bölgesi Avrupa Birliği için çok önemli hale geldi. İlk olarak, Karadeniz Bölgesinde istikrar ve güvenlik AB için önemlidir. Bu bölge organize suçlar ve terörizmin yayılmasını önlemede Avrupa Birliği için bir endişe kaynağıdır. Öte yandan, bu bölge AB için enerji ve ulaşım için önemli bir terminaldir. AB Karadeniz ülkelerinin önemli bir ekonomik ve ticari ortağıdır ve tüm bölgede bölgesel kalkınmayı desteklemekte ve demokratik ve ekonomik reformları teşvik etmek için çok çaba harcamaktadır.
    [Show full text]
  • Fieldwork on Threatened Vipers In
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSIRCF REPTILES • VOL15, NO & 4 AMPHIBIANS• DEC 2008 189 • 23(1):1–9 • APR 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES The. Chasing Valley Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer of sayi ) inFour Wisconsin: Viper Species and a On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: HighlandA Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................ of Dwarfs: FieldworkRobert W. Henderson on 198 ThreatenedRESEARCH ARTICLES Vipers in Northeastern Turkey . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis1 equestris) in Florida 2 2 ˙ 3 1 Konrad ............................................. Mebert , BayramBrian J. Camposano,Göçmen Kenneth, Mert L. Krysko, Karıs¸ Kevin, Nas¸it M. Enge, I g˘Ellenci ,M. and Donlan, Sylvain and Michael Ursenbacher Granatosky 212 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Section of Conservation Biology, University of Basel, CONSERVATION ALERT St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10, 4056 Basel, Switzerland ([email protected]) . 2World’sDepartment Mammals of Biology,in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A 2020 Vision for the Black Sea Region a Report by the Commission on the Black Sea
    A 2020 Vision for the Black Sea Region A Report by the Commission on the Black Sea www.blackseacom.eu An initiative of: The Black eaS Trust for Regional Cooperation A 2020 Vision for the Black Sea Region A Report by the Commission on the Black Sea Contents Why read this Report? 4 What is the Commission on the Black Sea? 7 Executive Summary 12 Резюме выводов 15 Yönetici Özeti 19 The Report Introduction: The State of Play 22 Peace and Security 28 Economic Development and Welfare 31 Democratic Institutions and Good Governance 34 Regional Cooperation 36 Conclusions 38 Policy Recommendations 40 The Black Sea in Figures 45 Abbreviations 65 Initiators 67 The Rapporteurs, Editor and Acknowledgements 69 Imprint 70 3 Why read this Report? Why read this Report? … because the Black Sea matters The Black Sea region is coming into its own - but it is a contested and sometimes dangerous neighbourhood. It has undergone countless political transformations over time. And now, once again, it is becoming the subject of an intense debate. This reflects the changing dynamics of the Black Sea countries and the complex realities of their politics and conflicts, economies and societies. Geography, the interests of others and the region’s relations with the rest of the world in large part explain its resurgence. Straddling Europe and Asia, the Black Sea links north to south and east to west. Oil, gas, transport and trade routes are all crucial in explaining its increasing relevance. In the last two decades the Black Sea has changed beyond recognition. We have witnessed the transformation of the former communist societies and the impact of globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ALPINE GARDEN SOCIETY's 60Th SEED LIST 2011-12 Please Read Through These Notes and Also the Notes on the Back O
    WELCOME TO THE ALPINE GARDEN SOCIETY’S 60th SEED LIST 2011-12 Please read through these notes and also the notes on the back of the order forms before completing the forms. The main distribution will begin in December and will continue into the new year. The seeds offered originate from various sources and cannot be guaranteed true to name. Neither The Alpine Garden Society nor any official of the Society can be held responsible for what is supplied. Members are reminded that named cultivars and hybrids cannot be relied upon to come true, and plants raised from seed from cultivars should not be labelled with the names of those cultivars. Seeds of many species are in short supply and we can never have enough to meet all requests. Members who request very rare or popular species must realise that they are likely to be disappointed and are advised to spread their requests throughout a variety of seeds on the list. Surplus seeds are those remaining after all applications for main distribution seeds have been met. Please see the notes on the back of the order form for futher information. On-line ordering will again be offered this year. You will be able to view the seed list, make your selections, order and pay for your seed order on line. We will take care to ensure parity between on line ordering and postal ordering so neither system will get priority. Please go to http://www.alpinegardensociety.net/seed/exchange/ and follow the instructions on the page. Overseas Members: Members outside the UK and the EU are reminded that most countries restrict the import of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Artvin İlindeki Köy Yerleşmelerinin Toponimik Özelliklerine Coğrafi Bir Bakış
    International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE) To Cite This Article: Orhan, F. (2021). A geographical overview of the toponymic features of village settlements in Artvin province. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 43, 278-297. Submitted: October 08, 2020 Revised: November 30, 2020 Accepted: December 11, 2020 A GEOGRAPHICAL OVERVIEW OF THE TOPONYMIC FEATURES OF VILLAGE SETTLEMENTS IN ARTVIN PROVINCE Artvin İlindeki Köy Yerleşmelerinin Toponimik Özelliklerine Coğrafi Bir Bakış Fatih ORHAN1 Öz Uygun iklim ve konum özelliklerine sahip olan Anadolu, geçmişten bu yana birçok medeniyete ev sahipliği yapmıştır. Her medeniyet yaşadığı topraklara gelecek nesillere aktarılmak üzere kendi özelliklerini yansıtacak çeşitli izler bırakmıştır. Bu izlerden biri de yer adlarıdır. Yer adları tarih, kültür ve coğrafyanın kesişim noktasında yer alır ve bunlardan izler barındırır. Bu kapsamda yer adlarının incelenmesi, o bölgenin birçok özelliği hakkında fikir verebilir. Çalışmada Artvin ilindeki köy adları bu bakımdan ele alınmış ve ortaya çıkmasına vesile olan unsurlar coğrafi bakış açısıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Böylece Anadolu kültür mozaiğini oluşturan bütündeki bir parçanın tamamlanması amaçlanmıştır. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı araştırmada, veri temininde tarihçiler tarafından yapılan çalışmalardan ve çeşitli sözlüklerden yararlanıldığı gibi, saha çalışmaları ile yöre sakinlerinden de bilgiler elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) ve İçişleri Bakanlığı’nın köy adlarının
    [Show full text]
  • Can Shelterwood Logging Maintain Herb Layer Diversity in a Beech Forest in Turkey?
    Yılmaz - Yılmaz: Herb layer diversity in a beech forest in Turkey - 487 - CAN SHELTERWOOD LOGGING MAINTAIN HERB LAYER DIVERSITY IN A BEECH FOREST IN TURKEY? YILMAZ, O. Y.1* – YILMAZ, H.2 1Department of Surveying and Cadastre, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul 34473, Turkey 2Ornamental Plant Cultivation Program, Vocational School of Forestry, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul 34473, Turkey (phone: +90-212-338-2400; fax: +90-212-338-2428) *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +90-212-338-2400; fax: +90-212-226-1113 (Received 9th Sep 2019; accepted 15th Nov 2019) Abstract. The abundance and diversity of forest understory vegetation can be significantly impacted by forest management. Besides having a wide geographical distribution in Turkey, the Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) is also one of the economically important timber species of the country. The aim of this study is to compare the understory herb layer communities of mature and young beech stands which regenerated as a result of the shelterwood method. We studied understory plant species diversity and composition in 16 plots in old and young beech stands in Belgrad Forest near İstanbul, Turkey. We found no significant differences between the two stand types in understory plant diversity but understory species compositions in two stand types were found to be different. Our finding can be useful for forest management planning; by focusing on stand scale to achieve forest management conserving understory plant diversity in a forest. Keywords: Belgrad Forest, understory composition, indicator species, pure beech stands, stand age Introduction Herb layer vegetation is an important component for biodiversity conservation efforts because it contains the majority of vascular plant species diversity and plays a significant role in forest ecosystem functioning (Augusto et al., 2003; Lorenz et al., 2006; Gilliam, 2007; Ellum, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • İmar Ve Şehircilik Daire Başkanlığı-Hafriyat Ve Denetim Şube Müdürlüğü İzinli Kamyon Listesi
    İmar ve Şehircilik Daire Başkanlığı-Hafriyat ve Denetim Şube Müdürlüğü İzinli Kamyon Listesi Paylaşım tarihi:03.02.2020 Araç Firma BELGE BİTİŞ Belge No Araç Markası Araç Cinsi Firma Tipi Firma Adı İlçe Adı Firma Adresi Plaka No Kapasitesi Telefon TARİHİ MEHMET HÜRRİYET MAH. SIDDIK İNÖNÜ CAD. MERCEDES- KAMYON 3 10m³ ŞAHIS GÜNDEM – 5426449078 İNCİRLİOVA NO:45 09 UM 182 9.2.2020 BENZ DAMPERLİ ÖZGÜNDEM İNCİRLİOVA TİCARET /AYDIN CUMHURİYET 0542 297 79 KAMYON LEVENT MAH. 1959 SOK 7 FORD CARGO 10m³ ŞAHIS 97 - 0 532 618 EFELER 09 KN 002 20.04.2020 DAMPERLİ TOKUŞ NO:7 / 9 EFELER / 20 86 AYDIN CUMHURİYET 0542 297 79 KAMYON LEVENT MAH. 1959 SOK 8 FORD CARCO 10m³ ŞAHIS 97 - 0 532 618 EFELER 09 HV 460 20.04.2020 DAMPERLİ TOKUŞ NO:7 / 9 EFELER / 20 86 AYDIN ZAFER MAH. KAMYON MAHMUT 0 542 676 26 ZÜBEYDE HANIM 9 BMC 10m³ ŞAHIS EFELER 09 SY 917 19.2.2020 DAMPERLİ ARSLAN 77 CAD. NO:21 / 1 EFELER / AYDIN AKARKUM ÇEKİCİ(YA MADENCİLİK TEPECİK MAH. 0 256 231 12 09 KZ 940 / RI HAFRİYAT ŞEHİT ER M. ALİ 13 DAF 16m³ TÜZEL 76 / 0 533 233 EFELER 09 HR 744 - 2.5.2020 RÖMORK NAK.HAY. TOSUN BLV. 32 67 DORSE ÇEKİCİ) TUR. İNŞ. NAK. NO:191 AYDIN HAY. TUR. İ. P. İmar ve Şehircilik Daire Başkanlığı-Hafriyat ve Denetim Şube Müdürlüğü İzinli Kamyon Listesi Paylaşım tarihi:03.02.2020 SAN. TİC. LİM. LTD.ŞTİ. AKARKUM MADENCİLİK HAFRİYAT TEPECİK MAH. 0 256 231 12 KAMYON NAK.HAY. ŞEHİT ER M. ALİ 14 RENAULT 10m³ TÜZEL 76 / 0 533 233 EFELER 67 TU 079 2.5.2020 DAMPERLİ TUR.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in Forest
    Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in the Forest Communities of Turkey Evidence and policy impact analysis POVERTY, FOREST DEPENDENCE AND MIGRATION IN THE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF TURKEY A B POVERTY, FOREST DEPENDENCE AND MIGRATION IN THE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF TURKEY Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in the Forest Communities of Turkey Evidence and policy impact analysis JUNE, 2017 Acknowledgements This paper was prepared by a combined team1 of World Bank staff and consultants, working with local Turkish consultants and stakeholders in close collaboration.2 The team would like to acknowledge the efforts of UDA Consulting in Turkey for the survey’s design and implementation. The team would like to acknowledge the support and design contributions of the Program for Forests (PROFOR), who also funded this study. Additionally, the team would like to acknowledge the cooperation of the General Directorate of Forestry (GDF), who provided guidance and the oversight of information that led to the construction of the survey and sample design. The findings from this paper form an integral part of a much broader engagement with the Turkish GDF through a jointly-produced Forest Policy Note. 1 The Team comprised: Craig M. Meisner (World Bank, Task Team Leader and Sr Environmental Economist), Limin Wang (World Bank, Consultant), Raisa Chandrashekhar Behal (World Bank, Consultant), and Priya Shyamsundar (World Bank, Consultant), Andrew Mitchell (World Bank, Sr Forestry Specialist), and Esra Arikan (World Bank, Sr Environmental Specialist). 2 Local Turkish collaborators included: UDA Consulting for survey implementation and the Central Union of Turkish Forestry Cooperatives (OR-KOOP). CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]