Geological Development, Origin, and Energy Mineral Resources of the Williston Basin, North Dakota

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geological Development, Origin, and Energy Mineral Resources of the Williston Basin, North Dakota GEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, ORIGIN, AND ENERGY MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE WILLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA by LEE C. GERHARD, SIDNEY B. ANDERSON, JULIE A. LEFEVER, and CLARENCE G. CARLSON MISCELLANEOUS SERIES 63 Reprinted from The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin No.8, v. 66 NORTH DAKOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (AugllSt. 1982), p. 989-1020. 36 Figs., 1 Table. Don L. Halvorson, State Geologist The American Asso~iation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin v. 66, No.8 (Auguu 1982), P. 989-1020, 36 Figs., I Table Geological Development, Origin, and Energy Mineral Resources of Williston Basin, North Dakota} LEE C. GERHARD,' SIDNEY B. ANDERSON,' JULIE A. LEFEVER,> and CLARENCE G. CARLSON' ABSTRACT part of the basin during Absaroka sequence deposition, a product oferosion ofAncestral Rocky Mountain orogenic The Williston basin of North Dakota, Montana, South structures. Continental and shallow marine clastic sedi­ Dakota, aud south-ceutral Canada (Manitoba and Sas­ ments were deposited during Zuni sedimentation until katchewan) is a major producer of oil and gas, lignite, Cretaceous deeper marine environments were estab­ and potash. Located on the western periphery of the lished. Laramide orogenesis to the west provided detritus Phauerozoic North American craton, the Williston basin that was deposited in Ouvial, deltaic, and marginal has undergone only relatively mild tectonic distortion marine environments, regressing to the east. Major lig­ during Phanerozoic time. This distortion is largely re­ nite deposits are part of this postorogenic regressive rock lated to movement of Preca mbrian basement blocks. body. Sedimentary rocks ofcratonic sequences Sauk through Major structures in the basin, and the basin itself, may Tejas are present in the basin. Sauk (Cambrian-Lower result from left-lateral shear along the Colorado­ Ordovician), Tippecanoe (Ordovician-Silurian), and Wyoming and Fromberg zones during pre-Phanerozoic Kaskaskia (Devonian-Mississippian) sequence rocks are time. Deeper drilling in the basin has revealed several largely carhonate, as are the major oil- and gas­ major structures and given indications of others. Most producing formations. Absaroka (Pennsylvanian­ structures probably resulted from renewed movement or Triassic) and Zuni (Jurassic-Tertiary) rocks have more "tensing" of pre-Phaneroroic faults. Meteorite impact clastic content, but carbonates are locally important. events have been suggested as the origin for one or more Clastics of the Zuni sequence (Fort Vnion Group) contain structures. abundant lignite. Tejas (Tertiary-Quaternary) sequence rocks are not significant in the production of minerals or INTRODUCTION energy, although glacial sediments cover much of the region. Recent successful oil exploration and development in the Oil exploration and development in the Vnited States Williston basin have clearly demonstrated the inadequacy of portion of the Williston basin since 1972 have given im­ previous tectonic and sedimentologic models of the basin to petus to restudy basin evolution and geologic controls for predict occurrences of mineral and fuel resources. The energy-resource locations. Consequently, oil production in North Dakota, for instance, has jumped from a nadir United States portion of the basin has sustained oil develop­ ofl9 million bbl in 1974 (compared to a previous zenith of ment during the last half of the 1970s that is remarkable in its 27 million in 1966) to 32 million hbl in 1979 and 40 million definition of previously unrecognized structures, discovery bbl in 1980. Geologic knowledge of carbonate reservoirs of new producing zones, and high success rates. The largest has expanded accordingly. single segment of the basin is the North Dakota portion (Fig. Depositional environments throughout Sauk, Tip­ I), which includes the deepest part of the basin and the pecanoe, and Kaskaskia deposition were largely shallow thickest Phanerozoic section. The wildcat success rate in marine. Subtidal and even basinal environments were North Dakota has steadily increased from 250/, in 1977; 28% developed in the basin center, but sabkha deposits were in 1978; 33% in 1979; to 36% through the first 6 months of abundant near the basin periphery. Evidence ofsubaerial 1980, whereas the recent national average was 15 to 18% for a weathering was commonly preserved in structurally high areas and on the basin periphery, especially in upper similar period (Johnston, 1980; Fig. 2). Although South Kaskaskia rocks. Some pinnacle reefs were developed in Dakota and Montana also sustain active programs, their Kaskaskia deposition. morphologically similar to the success rates are lower; Montana has the second most suc­ Silurian pinnacle reefs of the Michigan basin. cessful active drilling program in the basin. Clastic sediments were transported into the southern Oil and gas are not the only mineral and energy resources @1982. The Amencan ASSOCiation of Petroleum Geologists All nghts Ing our efforts. In particular. James H. Clement of Shell Oil Co.; Cooper reserved. Land, consultant; and Walter Moore of the University of North Dakota have 'Manuscnpt received, July 10, 1981, revised and accepted, Apn114, 1982. been Instrumental in construction of our ideas and approach. Other col­ 2North Dakota Geological Survey. Present address Union Texas Petro­ leagues and students who have contributed to this summary are Randolph leum Company, Denver, Colorado Burke. Diane Catt, Tom Heck, John Himebaugh. Peter Loeffler, Tom 3North Dakota Geological Survey, University Station, Grand Forks, North Obelenus, and Nancy Perrin. Support for some of the original studies of Dakota 58202. depositional systems and reservOIr geology came from the North Dakota 4North Dakota Geological Survey. Present address: OIl and Gas DiVISion, Geological Survey, the Carbonate Studies Laboratory of the University of North Dakota Industrial Commission, Bismarck. North DaKota. North Dakota, and from a grant by the U.S. Geological Survey (14-08· Many of our colleagues, students, and cooperating SCIentists have spent 0001-G-591). All of the support is gratefully acknowledged. extensive amounts of time discussing ideas. providing data. and redirect- 989 990 Williston Basin, North Dakota of the basin. Lignite reserves are huge and are actively being basin penetrated Precambrian rock at l5,340 ft (4,676 m); the explored and utilized. Rich potash resources are being mined deepest oil production is from 14,343 ft (4,372 m) in the in Saskatchewan and a mine has been announced for western Ordovician Red River Formation (Mesa 1-13 Brandvik, Dunn Manitoba. In North Dakota and Montana, potash resources County, Nonh Dakota). are potentially far more valuable than the lignite, but are not Rocks deposited during all periods of Phanerozoic time are yet being mined. Halite is being mined near Williston, North present in the basin (Fig. 3). Paleozoic rocks are mainly Dakota, from depths of 8,000 ft (2.438 m) making it proba­ carbonates, followed by the dominantly clastic Mesozoic and bly the world's deepest salt production. The halite deposits Cenozoic rock sequence. Sloss's (1963) sequence concept is are vast, being approximately 1,700 mi' (7,086 km'). particularly useful in the study of these rocks. serving to Coincident with energy development, interest in water "package" major transgressive cycles of continental scale resources (for energy transportation) and the overall regional with accompanying sediment deposition. For this reason, economic significance of the basin has led to an extensive discussions of stratigraphic units and their significance to study of basin geology, with numerous programs of investi­ deciphering the structural evolution of the Williston basin are gation under way. Programs of the Nonh Dakota Geological organized by sequences. Survey, the U.S. Geological Survey, Depanment of Energy, Few regional studies of Williston basin rocks have been and several oil companies deserve particular note; much of published. Several important contributions used extensively the information in this summary is derived from these in this paper are the papers of Poner and Fuller (1959), sources. Carlson and Anderson (1966), the various papers presented in The Williston basin is a slightly irregular, round depression the Geologic Atlas of the Rocky Mountains (Mallory, 1972 a, in the western distal Canadian shield. Structural trends within b), and Macauley et al (1964). Several unpuhlished works of the basin reflect major directional changes in the structure of oil company geologists are also used in this paper, especially the Rocky Mountain belt (Fig. 2). Several writers have those of lames Clement (personal commun., oral dis­ hypothesized a wrench-fault system for control of basin cussions, 1975-80). geometry and structure (Thomas, 1974: Brown, 1978), al­ Several cycles of interpretive writing are evident in the though those studies did not integrate sedimentary depo· literature about the Williston basin. Each proceeds from an sitional facies and porosity development infonnation. equivalent cycle ofmineral or fuel development activity. This Approximately 16,000 ft (4,875 m) of sedimentary rocks cycling of activities is common to most petroleum provinces. are present in the deepest part of the Williston basin, south­ The Williston basin is in its third cycle of oil development east of Watford City, Nonh Dakota. The deepest well in the now and is rapidly increasing oil production. Most of the United States pan of the Williston basin is contained in Nonh Dakota; its statistics
Recommended publications
  • L'.3350 Deposmon and DISSOLUTION of the MIDDLE DEVONIAN PRAIRIE FORMATION, Williston BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA and MONTANA By
    l'.3350 DEPOsmON AND DISSOLUTION OF THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN PRAIRIE FORMATION, WilLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA AND MONTANA by: Chris A. Oglesby T-3350 A thesis submined to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date f:" /2 7 /C''i::-- i ; Signed: Approved: Lee C. Gerhard Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado - 7 Date' .' Samuel S. Adams, Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering II T-3350 ABSTRACf Within the Williston basin, thickness variations of the Prairie Formation are common and are interpreted to originate by two processes, differential accumulation of salt during deposition, and differential removal of salt by dissolution. Unambiguous evidence for each process is rare because the Prairie/Winnipegosis interval is seldom cored within the U.S. portion of the basin. Therefore indirect methods, utilizing well logs, provide the principal method for identifying characteristics of the two processes. The results of this study indicate that the two processes can be distinguished using correlations within the Prairie Formation. Several regionally correlative upward-brining, and probably shoaling-upward sequences occur within the Prairie Formation .. Near the basin center, the lowermost sequence is transitional with the underlying Winnipegosis Formation. This transition is characterized by thinly laminated carbonates that become increasingly interbedded with anhydrites of the basin-centered Ratner Member, the remainder of the sequence progresses up through halite and culminates in the halite-dominated Esterhazy potash beds. Two overlying sequences also brine upwards, however, these sequences lack the basal anhydrite and instead begin with halite and culminate in the Belle Plaine and Mountrail potash Members, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences Charles A
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Geology Faculty Publications Geology 1987 Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences Charles A. Ross Western Washington University, [email protected] June R. P. Ross Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Charles A. and Ross, June R. P., "Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences" (1987). Geology Faculty Publications. 61. https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 24, 1987. LATE PALEOZOIC SEA LEVELS AND DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCES CHARLES A. ROSSI AND JUNE R. P. ROSS2 1 Chevron U.S.A., Inc.,P. O. BOX 1635, Houston, TX 77251 2 Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225 ABSTRACT studies on these changes in sea level and their paleogeographic distribution (Ross, 1979; Ross Cyclic sea level charts for the Lower and Ross, 1979, 1981a, 1981b, 1985a, 1985b) are Carboniferous (Mississippian), Middle and Upper elaborated on in this paper with charts in a Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), and Permian show similar format to that used for Mesozoic and considerable variability in the duration and Cenozoic sea-level cyclic fluctuations by Haq, magnitude of third-order depositional sequences, Hardenbol, and Vail (1987 and this volume). and also in the position of general sea level as represented by second-order sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Potential of the Red River Formation, Southwestern North Dakota Timothy O
    Oil and Gas Potential of the Red River Formation, Southwestern North Dakota Timothy O. Nesheim Introduction North Dakota has experienced commercial oil and gas production third highest for the state, a bronze medal so to speak, and is from 19 different geologic formations over the past 65 years. only eclipsed by the “gold” medal Bakken-Three Forks Formations Most of these productive formations have experienced spotlight (>1.2 billion barrels of oil) and the “silver” medal Madison Group attention from the oil and gas industry at one time or another, (Mission Canyon & Charles Formations, ~1 billion barrels of oil). and, whether for a few months or years, were considered a “hot Red River production is also regionally extensive and stretches play” to explore and develop. The unconventional Bakken-Three into northwestern South Dakota, eastern Montana, and southern Forks development is a current example of a play that brought Saskatchewan (fig. 1). oil and gas activity in the state to record levels and has sustained drilling activity even in a depressed oil and gas market. As the Summary of Red River Oil and Gas Production oil and gas industry transitions beyond the Bakken over time and The upper Red River consists of four, vertically stacked, oil- begins to spend more time evaluating the other 17 productive productive sedimentary rock layers referred to informally as the non-Bakken/Three Forks Formations, additional oil and gas plays “A” through “D” zones (fig. 2). Just over half of the Red River’s will emerge across western North Dakota. One formation that oil production has come from horizontal wells drilled within the has previously experienced “hot play” status and may be poised “B” zone of southwestern Bowman County, a prolific oil play to one day re-emerge into the spotlight of the oil and gas industry that emerged during the late 1990s and was North Dakota’s “hot is the deeply buried Red River Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • TGI Strat Column 2009.Cdr
    STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION CHART TGI II: Williston Basin Architecture and Hydrocarbon Potential in Eastern Saskatchewan and Western Manitoba EASTERN MANITOBA PERIOD MANITOBA SUBSURFACE SASKATCHEWAN OUTCROP ERA glacial drift glacial drift glacial drift Quaternary Wood Mountain Formation Peace Garden Peace Garden Member Tertiary Member Ravenscrag Formation CENOZOIC Formation Goodlands Member Formation Goodlands Member Turtle Mountain Turtle Mountain Turtle Frenchman Formation Whitemud Formation Boissevain Formation Boissevain Formation Eastend Formation Coulter Member Coulter Member Bearpaw Formation Odanah Member Belly River “marker” Odanah Member Belly River Formation “lower” Odanah Member Millwood Member Lea Park Formation Millwood Member MONTANA GROUP Pembina Member Pembina Member Pierre Shale Pierre Shale Milk River Formation Gammon Ferruginous Member Gammon Ferruginous Member Niobrara Formation Chalky Unit Boyne Member Boyne Member Boyne Calcareous Shale Unit Member Carlile Morden Member Carlile upper Formation Morden Member Formation Morden Member Carlile Formation Assiniboine Marco Calcarenite Assiniboine Member Member CRETACEOUS Second White Specks Laurier Limestone Beds Favel Favel Keld Keld Member Member Formation Formation Belle Fourche Formation Belle Fourche Member MESOZOIC COLORADO GROUP Belle Fourche Member upper Fish Scale Formation Fish Scale Zone upper Base of Fish Scale marker Base of Fish Scale marker Westgate Formation Westgate Member lower Westgate Member Newcastle Formation Newcastle Member lower Viking Sandstone
    [Show full text]
  • Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary Report on Paleozoic Stratigraphy, Mapping and Hydrocarbon A
    Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and GP2008-2 hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba By M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn GEOSCIENTIFIC PAPER Geoscientific Paper GP2008-2 Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba by M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn Winnipeg, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions January, 2009 Science, Technology, Energy and Mines Mineral Resources Division Hon. Jim Rondeau John Fox Minister Assistant Deputy Minister John Clarkson Manitoba Geological Survey Deputy Minister E.C. Syme Director ©Queen’s Printer for Manitoba, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions, January 2009 Every possible effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, but Manitoba Science, Technol- ogy, Energy and Mines does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users should verify critical information. Any digital data and software accompanying this publication are supplied on the understanding that they are for the sole use of the licensee, and will not be redistributed in any form, in whole or in part, to third parties. Any references to proprietary software in the documentation and/or any use of proprietary data formats in this release do not constitute endorsement by Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines of any manufacturer’s product. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledgment should be given to the Manitoba Geological Survey. The following reference format is recommended: Nicolas, M.P.B, and Barchyn, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stonewall Formation Timothy O
    The Stonewall Formation Timothy O. Nesheim Introduction Geology The Stonewall Formation is one of numerous sedimentary strata The Stonewall Formation consists of three carbonate-evaporitic that have commercially produced oil and gas from North Dakota’s cycles deposited during Late Ordovician through Early Silurian subsurface. The Stonewall Formation is also one of many time (fig. 2). The Stonewall Formation is conformably under- geological formations being overshadowed by the prolific Bakken- lain by the Stony Mountain Formation and overlain by the In- Three Forks play. Interestingly, the first successful production terlake Formation. Each Stonewall cycle consists of three gen- test that recovered hydrocarbons (oil and gas) from the eral lithofacies: 1) bioturbated to laminated carbonate mudstone Stonewall Formation took place in 1952, less than a year after the 2) thin greyish green dolomitic and/or shaley, silty to sandy discovery of oil in North Dakota. However, sustained commercial mudstone, and 3) nodular to laminated anhydrite that is some- production from the Stonewall Formation did not take place for times interlaminated to interbedded with dolomite (fig. 3). another 27 years until 1979. Since then, the Stonewall Formation Deposition is interpreted to have taken place within a shallow has produced approximately 10 million barrels of oil equivalent marine (carbonate facies) to hypersaline (anhydrite facies) set- (MBOE) from 65 vertical wells (fig. 1). ting. The shaly sandy mudstone intervals have previously been Figure 1. Map depicting the extent of the Stonewall Formation and Stonewall productive wells in North Dakota (Carlson and Eastwood, 1962). For regulatory reasons the Stonewall Formation has been pooled together with the lower Interlake Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Control and Distribution of Porosity in the Red River C Laminated Member
    Control and distribution of porosity in the Red River C laminated member at the Brush Lake Field by James Roy Stimson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences Montana State University © Copyright by James Roy Stimson (1985) Abstract: The Red River "C" cycle at the Brush Lake field consists of three distinct informal members; 1) the anhydrite member, 2) the laminated member, and 3) the burrowed member, in descending order. This cycle can be interpreted as a tidal flat deposit with the above members representing the supratidal, intertidal, and subtidal environments, respectively. The laminated member has been thoroughly dolomitized at Brush Lake and porosity values within the dolomites change rapidly. Evidence from Brush Lake reveals that the porosity distribution is primarily the result of diagenetic controls rather than structural or depositional controls. Textural evidence from the laminated member indicates that porosity has been reduced in some parts of the laminated member by 1) early precipitation of calcite cements, 2) overdolomitization, 3) early precipitation of gypsum, 4) late precipitation of replacive anhydrite, and 5) pressure solution along low amplitude stylolites. CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION OF POROSITY IN THE RED RIVER "C" LAMINATED MEMBER AT THE BRUSH LAKE FIELD by James Roy Stimson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May, 1985 St 55 Ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by James Roy Stimson This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the College of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Bakken and Lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1986 Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P. Huber University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Huber, Timothy P., "Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota" (1986). Theses and Dissertations. 145. https://commons.und.edu/theses/145 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE BAKKEN AND LOWER LODGEPOLE FORMATIONS (DEVONIAN AND MISSISSIPPIAN), WILLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA by Timothy P, Huber Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota - Morris, 1983 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 1986 This thesis submitted by Timothy P. Huber in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science from the University of North Dakota has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done, and is hereby approved. This thesis meets the standards for appearance and conforms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Section of Paleozoic Rocks of Western North Dakota
    JolfN P. BLOEMLE N. D. Geological Survey NORTH DAKOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILSON M. LAIRD, State Geologist Miscel1aneous Series No. 34 CROSS-SECTION OF PALEOZOIC ROCKS OF WESTERN NORTH DAKOTA BY CLARENCE G. CARLSON Reprinted from Stratigraphic Cross Section of Paleozoic Rocks-Oklahoma to Saskatchewan, 1967: The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Cross Section Publication 5, p. 13-15, 1 Plate Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1967 NORTH DAKOTAI (Section E-F. Plate 5) C. G. CARLSON' Grand Forks, North Dakota INTRODUCTION which, in ascending order, are the Black Island, Icebox, The North Dakota segment of the cross section was and Roughlock. The Black Island generally consists of constructed with the base of the Spearfish Formation as clean quartzose sandstone, the Icebox of greenish-gray, noncalcareous shale, and the Roughlock of greenish-gray the datum. However, the Permian-Triassic boundary to brownish-gray, calcareous shale or siltstone. now is thought to be within redbeds of the Spearfish The Black Island and Icebox Formations can be Formation (Dow, 1964). If this interpretation is cor­ traced northward to Saskatchewan, but they have not rect, perhaps as much as 300 ft of Paleozoic rocks in been recognized as formations there and are included in well 3 and smaller thicknesses in wells I, 2, and 4-12 an undivided Winnipeg Formation. The Black Island are excluded from Plate 5. pinches out southwestward because of nondeposition Wells were selected which best illustrate the Paleozo­ along the Cedar Creek anticline, but the Icebox and ic section and its facies changes in the deeper part of Roughlock Formations, although not present on the the Williston basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Evolution of the Appalachians
    Paleozoic Evolution of the Appalachians: Tectonic Overview Three major tectonic episodes, all involving lateral accretion of terranes: deformation, terrane migration, accretion, and continental convergence 1. Ordovician Taconic Orogeny (~470-440 Ma) • collision of Laurentian margin with one or more magmatic arcs Shelburne Falls arc (475-470 Ma) and Bronson Hill arc (454-442 Ma) • or, continent-continent collision between Laurentia and proto-Andean region of Gondwana • slope & rise sediments thrust westward over shelf deposits 2. Devonian Acadian Orogeny (~420-360 Ma) • accretion of Avalon terrane southward continuation of Silurian Caledonian Orogeny (NW Europe) collision of Baltica with Laurentia to form Laurussia • deformation of Bronson Hill arc and sedimentary basins seaward of BH arc at least 3 pulses of deformation • oblique accretion of Avalon and other terranes(?) much strike-slip displacement but also subduction (coastal volcanics) • large mountains erosion creates thick clastic wedge (Catskills and Poccono Mtns.); thinned westward toward cratonic interior 3. Pennsylvansylvanian-Permian Alleghenian Orogeny (~325- 275 Ma) • collision with Gondwanaland consolidation of supercontinent Pangea • extensive zone of deformation New England - Georgia & Alabama (Appalachian Mtns.) - Oklahoma, Arkansas (Ouachita Mtns.) - Texas (Marathon Mtns.) • side-effects: deep crustal shear in Mass., formation of Narragansett rift basin basement block faulting in western interior, uplift of ancestral Rockies "TECTONIC CYCLES" • recorded by the creation of foreland basins sedimentation in eastern New York • associated with tectonic uplift and deformation due to the accretion of island arcs to the east in Massachusetts (first the Ordovician Taconic Orogeny followed by the Devonian Acadian Orogeny: Ordovician Taconic Orogeny (generalized succession in eastern NY) Age Environment Lithology Formation late Ordovician deltaic and molasse Queenston Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Depositional Environment of the Upper Mississippian Big Snowy Group in the Bridger Range, Southwest Montana By
    Stratigraphy and depositional environment of the Upper Mississippian Big Snowy Group in the Bridger Range, southwest Montana by Gary Eich Guthrie A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Science Montana State University © Copyright by Gary Eich Guthrie (1984) Abstract: The Big Snowy Group is restricted to a trough which extends from southwest Montana into the Williston basin. Thickness variation of the group on the southern margin of the trough reflects movement of structural elements along an ancient structural weakness located in the central Bridget Range. Field and petrographic data are integrated to determine the depositional environment and stratigraphy of the group and to document the tectonic influence on sedimentation along this zone. The group is divided into the Kibbey Formation, with two informal members, and the Lombard facies of the Heath Formation. The lower Kibbey is supratidal algal laminated dolostone with dessication features and evaporite solution breccias were deposited at the leading edge of the transgressing Big Snowy sea. Siliciclastic intertidal channels on the sabkha are restricted to the central range where subsidence was greatest. The upper Kibbey and Lombard facies provide further evidence of a trough in the central Bridgers. The upper Kibbey is a regressive shoreface deposit composed of fine grained sandstone at the northern and southern ends of the range. Mudstone and siltstone dominate in the center of the range where deeper water and lower energy conditions prevailed. Ultimately, the Kibbey shoreface transgressed out of the area and the Lombard facies was deposited in a partially restricted shelf lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Fox Hills Formation (Late Cretaceous
    GEOLOGY OF THE FOX HILLS FORMATION (LATE CRETACEOUS) IN THE WILLISTON BASIN OF NORTH DAKOTA, WITH REFERENCE TO URANIUM POTENTIAL by A. M. CVANCARA UNNERSITY OF NORTIl DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY GRAND FORKS, NORTII DAKOTA 58202 REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 5S NORTH DAKOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. A. Noble, State Geologist 1976 PREPARED FOR mE U.S. ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION GRAND JUNCTION OFFICE UNDER CONTRACT NO. AT(05-1)-1633 G1O-1633-1 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ~ag~ INTRODUCTION . 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .... 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2 STRATIGRAPHY ......................... .. .. 2 Definition and relationship to other rock units .. 2 Distribution . .. 3 Lithology and sedimentary structures .. 3 Persistence of lithologic units ... .. 7 Contacts .. ... .. .. ., 7 Thickness . .. ... .. 8 STRUcrURE ... 8 PALEONTOLOGY . 9 Fossil groups . 9 Occurrence of fossils · ..... , 9 AGE AND CORRELATION 10 DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS .............................. 10 URANIUM POTENTIAL . · 12 General . .. ., 12 Fox Hills Formation . 13 REFERENCES . · 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Fox Hills and adjacent Formations in North Dakota (modified from Carlson, 1973) . 4 2. Schematic stratigraphic column of Fox Hills Formation in North Dakota (modified slightly from Erickson, 1974, p. 144). The Linton Member was named by Klett and Erickson (1976). 5 Plate 1. Northwest-southeast cross section (Dunn to Sioux Counties) of Fox Hills Formation in southwestern North Dakota . (in pocket) 2. Southwest-northeast cross section (Bowman to Pierce Counties) of Fox Hills Formation in western North Dakota (in pocket) 3. Southwest-northeast cross section (Adams to Burleigh Counties) of Fox Hills Formation in southwestern North Dakota (in pocket) 4. Isopach map of Fox Hills Formation in North Dakota (in pocket) ABSTRACT model is followed for the deposition of Fox Hills sediments.
    [Show full text]