DOCSLIB.ORG

TGI Strat Column 2009.Cdr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION CHART TGI II: Williston Basin Architecture and Hydrocarbon Potential in Eastern Saskatchewan and Western Manitoba EASTERN MANITOBA PERIOD MANITOBA SUBSURFACE SASKATCHEWAN OUTCROP ERA glacial drift glacial drift glacial drift Quaternary Wood Mountain Formation Peace Garden Peace Garden Member Tertiary Member Ravenscrag Formation CENOZOIC Formation Goodlands Member Formation Goodlands Member Turtle Mountain Turtle Mountain Turtle Frenchman Formation Whitemud Formation Boissevain Formation Boissevain Formation Eastend Formation Coulter Member Coulter Member Bearpaw Formation Odanah Member Belly River “marker” Odanah Member Belly River Formation “lower” Odanah Member Millwood Member Lea Park Formation Millwood Member MONTANA GROUP Pembina Member Pembina Member Pierre Shale Pierre Shale Milk River Formation Gammon Ferruginous Member Gammon Ferruginous Member Niobrara Formation Chalky Unit Boyne Member Boyne Member Boyne Calcareous Shale Unit Member Carlile Morden Member Carlile upper Formation Morden Member Formation Morden Member Carlile Formation Assiniboine Marco Calcarenite Assiniboine Member Member CRETACEOUS Second White Specks Laurier Limestone Beds Favel Favel Keld Keld Member Member Formation Formation Belle Fourche Formation Belle Fourche Member MESOZOIC COLORADO GROUP Belle Fourche Member upper Fish Scale Formation Fish Scale Zone upper Base of Fish Scale marker Base of Fish Scale marker Westgate Formation Westgate Member lower Westgate Member Newcastle Formation Newcastle Member lower Viking Sandstone lower Skull Creek Member Skull Creek Member Joli Fou Formation Ashville Formation Ashville Formation Pense Formation (P4) Pense “P4” marker P2+P3 (lithological tops of sand) Swan River Formation Swan River Formation GROUP Cantuar Formation MANNVILLE S2 Success Formation (S2 ) Success Formation (S2 )equivalent Fm Success S1 Waskada Formation Masefield Shale Rierdon Formation Upper Melita Member Shaun- Upper Member avon Fm Melita Lower Melita Member Lower Member Formation Gravel- Upper Member Reston JURASSIC bourg Formation Lower Gravelbourg “marker” Reston Formation Fm Lower Member Upper Member Upper (Evaporite) Member Upper Evaporite Watrous Amaranth Lower Red Beds Formation Lower (Red Beds) Member Formation Lower Member Amaranth Formation TRIASSIC St. Martin Igneous & Metamorphic Complex PERMIAN Pennsylvanian BIG SNOWY GROUP Greenpoint Anhydrite Poplar Beds Oungre Evaporite Oungre Zone Ratcliff Beds Ratcliff Charles Formation Midale Evaporite upper lower Midale Beds Frobisher Evaporite Hastings Evaporite Frobisher Beds Charles Formation Kisbey Kisbey Interval Interval MC-3b MISSISSIPPIAN Alida Beds Dando Evaporite MC-3 MC-3 marker Member MADISON GROUP MC-3a Mission Canyon Formation upper MC-2 marker MC-2 Tilston Beds Member lower MC-1 Member Mission Cannon Formation Flossie Lake Member Slope facies (Daly Field) Shelf facies (Virden Field) upper middle upper Daly Member lower Cruickshank lower MADISON GROUP Shale facies Whitewater Lake Mbr Souris Valley Beds Cruickshank upper Crinoidal facies Lodgepole Formation Cromer lower Shale facies Member Virden Basal Scallion Member Limestone facies Routledge Shale facies Upper Member Upper Member Middle Member Middle Member ? Bakken Fm Bakken Fm Lower Member Lower Member Big Valley Formation QU’APPELLE GROUP THREE FORKS GROUP Torquay Formation Three Forks Formation Upper Birdbear Upper (biohermal facies) Lower Birdbear Lower (platform facies) Birdbear Fm Birdbear Fm Seward Member Seward Member Duperow Formation Flat Lake Evaporite Flat Lake Evaporite Upper Upper SASKATCHEWAN GROUP SASKATCHEWAN SASKATCHEWAN GROUP SASKATCHEWAN Duperow Formation Middle Middle Wymark Member Duperow Formation Wymark Member Lower Lower Elstow Member Elstow Member Saskatoon Member Saskatoon Member GROUP SASKATCHEWAN Souris River marker Hatfield Member Hatfield Member Hatfield/Minitonas Member Upper Harris Evaporite Sagemace Member Harris Member Harris Member Lower Harris Evaporite Basal Shale Davidson Evaporite Dolomitic Limestone Beds PALEOZOIC Davidson Member Micritic Limestone Beds Davidson Member Argillaceous Limestone Beds Souris River Formation Souris River Formation Souris River Formation First Red Beds First Red Bed Member First Red Bed Member Point Wilkins Mbr DEVONIAN Hubbard Evaporite Hubbard Evaporite MANITOBA GROUP MANITOBA GROUP MANITOBA GROUP Neely Member Neely Member Upper Member (D) Middle Member (C) Burr Member Burr Member Lower Member (B) Second Red Bed Member Formation Second Red Bed Member (A) Dawson Bay Formation Dawson Bay Formation Second Red Bed Member Dawson Bay Patience Lake Member Belle Plaine Member White Bear Member White Bear Member Esterhazy Member Esterhazy Member Prairie Evaporite Prairie Evaporite GROUP GROUP Transitional Unit Transitional Beds Transitional Beds Upper Member GROUP Upper Member Upper Member Fm Fm ELK POINT ELK POINT Fm Lower Mb Winnipegosis Winnipegosis Lower Member Winnipegosis Lower Member Elm Point Formation Ashern Formation Ashern Formation Ashern Formation ELK POINT Cedar Lake Formation Upper Interlake upper Interlake equivalent East Arm Formation Atikameg Formation Lower Interlake lower Interlake equivalent INTERLAKE GROUP Moose Lake Formation INTERLAKE GROUP INTERLAKE GROUP Interlake Formation SILURIAN Lower Interlake Anhydrite Fisher Branch Formation Upper Stonewall Anhydrite upper Stonewall upper Stonewall ? t-marker t-marker t-marker Medial Stonewall Anhydrite lower Stonewall lower Stonewall Stonewall Formation Stonewall Formation Stonewall Formation Basal Stonewall Anhydrite Williams Member Basal Stonewall Anhydrite Williams Member Williams Member Gunton Anhydrite Gunton Anhydrite Gunton Member Gunton Member Gunton Member upper Penitentiary Member Gunn Member Gunn Member / Penitentiary Member Gunn Member Stony Mountain Fm Stony Mountain Fm Stony Mountain Fm Hartaven Member Hartaven Member lower Hartaven Member Redvers Unit Redvers Unit Coronach Anhydrite BIGHORN GROUP BIGHORN GROUP Coronach Unit Coronach Member Fort Garry Member Lake Alma Anhydrite upper Lake Alma Anhydrite Lake Alma Member Lake Alma Unit Herald Formation Unit C ? ORDOVICIAN Selkirk Member lower Red River Yeoman Formation (Yeoman equivalent) ? Cat Head Member Red River Sub-group Unit B Red River Formation Red River Formation Dog Head Member Hecla Beds Hecla Beds Hecla Beds (Unit A) upper unit Icebox Member Carman Sand Winnipeg Formation lower unit Black Island Member Winnipeg Fm Winnipeg Fm basal sandstone unit CAMBRIAN Deadwood Formation Deadwood Formation Deadwood Formation PRECAMBRIAN Precambrian Precambrian Precambrian January 2009.
Recommended publications
  • Ennis 30 X 60 Text–MBMG

    Ennis 30 X 60 Text–MBMG

    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE ENNIS 30' x 60' QUADRANGLE MADISON AND GALLATIN COUNTIES, MONTANA, AND PARK COUNTY, WYOMING by Karl S. Kellogg* and Van S. Williams* Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 529 2006 * U. S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO Revisions by MBMG This report has been reviewed for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines & Geology’s technical and editorial standards. Introductory Note This geologic quadrangle map is based almost entirely on the original map by Karl S. Kellogg and Van S. Williams (2000) published by the U.S. Geological Survey as Geologic Investigation Series I-2690, scale 1:100,000. Differences from the original map arise from MBMG’s effort to integrate the Ennis quadrangle data with adjacent MBMG quadrangle maps to establish a seamless geologic coverage in southwest Montana. To this end, some map unit letter symbols have been revised, twelve new units have been added, two units have been dropped, and a few unit text descriptions have been slightly modified. 1 Kalispell MONTANA 15 Great Falls 90 Missoula Helena 94 Butte Bozeman Billings 90 90 15 112°00' R3W R2W R1W R1E R2E R3E R4E R5E 111°00' 45°30' R n o s T4S 287 i d a 191 Mc Allister M Ennis TOBACCO ROOT Lake MOUNTAINS T5S r MADISON CO CO GALLATIN C Ja te ck ni C ra r G Ennis Virginia T6S City 287 A Big Sky CO PARK ld Big Sky e r Meadow Village C Mountain Village r GALLATIN CO GALLATIN G M r C a k a c l o d R T7S l i a s Cameron t o Bea i r C n n r GALLATIN RANGE GRAVELLY R 287 R i i v v RANGE e MADISON RANGE r e T8S Indian Cr r ylor Fo r Ta k R ub r y C T9S R by 191 Ru 45°00' 0246 mile 0 2 46 8 km Figure 1.
  • Helium in Southwestern Saskatchewan: Accumulation and Geological Setting

    Helium in Southwestern Saskatchewan: Accumulation and Geological Setting

    Open File Report 2016-1 Helium in Southwestern Saskatchewan: Accumulation and Geological Setting Melinda M. Yurkowski 2016 (Revised 14 December 2016) Saskatchewan Geological Survey ii Open File Report 2016-1 Open File Report 2016-1 Helium in Southwestern Saskatchewan: Accumulation and Geological Setting Melinda M. Yurkowski 2016 (Revised 14 December 2016) Printed under the authority of the Minister of the Economy © 2016, Government of Saskatchewan Although the Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy has exercised all reasonable care in the compilation, interpretation and production of this product, it is not possible to ensure total accuracy, and all persons who rely on the information contained herein do so at their own risk. The Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy and the Government of Saskatchewan do not accept liability for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies that may be included in, or derived from, this product. This product is available for viewing and download at: http://www.publications.gov.sk.ca/deplist.cfm?d=310&c=176 Information from this publication may be used if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this publication be made in the following form: Yurkowski, M.M. (2016): Helium in southwestern Saskatchewan: accumulation and geological setting; Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Open File Report 2016-1, 20p. and Microsoft® Excel® file. Saskatchewan Geological Survey ii Open File Report 2016-1 Contents Introduction and Study Area ..........................................................................................................................................
  • Mesocyparis Rosanovii</Emphasis> Sp. Nov

    Mesocyparis Rosanovii</Emphasis> Sp. Nov

    ISSN 0031-0301, Paleontological Journal, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 328–338. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2006. Original Russian Text © T.M. Kodrul, M.V. Tekleva, V.A. Krassilov, 2006, published in Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2006, No. 3, pp. 93–102. A New Conifer Species, Mesocyparis rosanovii sp. nov. (Cupressaceae, Coniferales), and Transberingian Floristic Connections T. M. Kodrula, M. V. Teklevab, and V. A. Krassilovc aGeological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 7, Moscow, 109017 Russia e-mail: [email protected] bPaleontological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow, 117997 Russia cInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel 31905, Haifa, Israel Received October 25, 2005 Abstract—A new species, Mesocyparis rosanovii sp. nov. from the Lower Paleocene of the Amur Region, Rus- sia, is characterized by a combination of advanced and primitive features: mixed opposite-alternate branching of vegetative shoots, leafy microsporophylls, as well as a relatively high number of sporangia per microsporo- phyll and seeds per cone scale. The Late Cretaceous–Early Paleogene genus Mesocyparis McIver et Basinger, which obviously embraces a natural group of closely related species, was a significant component of the vege- tation in the middle and high latitudes of eastern Asia and western North America. The range of the genus tes- tifies to terrestrial Transberingian connections between the continents during the Cretaceous warming phases. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030106030142 Key words: conifers, Cupressaceae, Paleocene, Amur Region, Beringia, phytogeography. INTRODUCTION from each other, which would have virtually excluded the possibility of migration. The problem of floristic exchanges between eastern In this context, phytogeographic relations between Asia and western regions of North America has long Asia and North America should be revised using mod- attracted the attention of phytogeographers.
  • Mannville Group of Saskatchewan

    Mannville Group of Saskatchewan

    Saskatchewan Report 223 Industry and Resources Saskatchewan Geological Survey Jura-Cretaceous Success Formation and Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Saskatchewan J.E. Christopher 2003 19 48 Printed under the authority of the Minister of Industry and Resources Although the Department of Industry and Resources has exercised all reasonable care in the compilation, interpretation, and production of this report, it is not possible to ensure total accuracy, and all persons who rely on the information contained herein do so at their own risk. The Department of Industry and Resources and the Government of Saskatchewan do not accept liability for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies that may be included in, or derived from, this report. Cover: Clearwater River Valley at Contact Rapids (1.5 km south of latitude 56º45'; latitude 109º30'), Saskatchewan. View towards the north. Scarp of Middle Devonian Methy dolomite at right. Dolomite underlies the Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation outcrops recessed in the valley walls. Photo by J.E. Christopher. Additional copies of this digital report may be obtained by contacting: Saskatchewan Industry and Resources Publications 2101 Scarth Street, 3rd floor Regina, SK S4P 3V7 (306) 787-2528 FAX: (306) 787-2527 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended Citation: Christopher, J.E. (2003): Jura-Cretaceous Success Formation and Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Saskatchewan; Sask. Industry and Resources, Report 223, CD-ROM. Editors: C.F. Gilboy C.T. Harper D.F. Paterson RnD Technical Production: E.H. Nickel M.E. Opseth Production Editor: C.L. Brown Saskatchewan Industry and Resources ii Report 223 Foreword This report, the first on CD to be released by the Petroleum Geology Branch, describes the geology of the Success Formation and the Mannville Group wherever these units are present in Saskatchewan.
  • A King-Size Theropod Coprolite

    A King-Size Theropod Coprolite

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232796267 A king-size theropod coprolite Article in Nature · June 1998 DOI: 10.1038/31461 CITATIONS READS 154 2,385 4 authors, including: Karen Chin Tim Tokaryk University of Colorado Boulder Royal Saskatchewan Museum 32 PUBLICATIONS 1,143 CITATIONS 39 PUBLICATIONS 488 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The Dinosaur Park Formation of Saskatchewan View project Paleobiodiverity and the K-Pg Boundary View project All content following this page was uploaded by Tim Tokaryk on 10 June 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. letters to nature compositions, though the ground mass contains more silicon and aluminium (Table 2). X-ray powder-diffraction analyses indicate A king-sized theropod that carbonate fluorapatite is the predominant phosphate mineral in both the bone and the ground mass. coprolite Several factors confirm that this specimen is a coprolite. The most diagnostic feature is a phosphatic composition, which is character- Karen Chin, Timothy T. Tokaryk*, Gregory M. Erickson†‡ istic of carnivore coprolites9. As phosphorus normally constitutes & Lewis C. Calk 10 only about 0.1% of the Earth’s crustal rocks , concentrated phos- United States Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 975, Menlo Park, phate deposits usually indicate biotic accumulations, and the overall 8 California 94025, USA configuration of the mass is consistent with the irregular faecal * Eastend Fossil Research Station, Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Box 460, deposits produced by very large animals. The matrix-supported Eastend, Saskatchewan S0N 0T0, Canada distribution of bone fragments argues against the possibility that the † Department of Integrative Biology & Museums of Vertebrate Zoology and mass represents regurgitated material or fluvially aggregated bone Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA debris.
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana

    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana

    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
  • FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics

    FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics

    FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION List of Topics BACKGROUND Reservation Overview Regional Geologic Overview GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW Geologic History Summary of Play Types CONVENTIONAL PLAY TYPES Play 1 - Shallow Cretaceous Biogenic Gas Play Play 2 - Northern Plains Biogenic Gas Play Plays 3,4,5 - Jurassic/Cretaceous and Mississippian Plays UNCONVENTIONAL / HYPOTHETICAL PLAY TYPES Plays 6,7 - Fractured Bakken and Cambrian Sandstone Plays REFERENCES Historical Background of the OVERVIEW (i.e. joint ventures) in contrast to procedures and regulatory minimums imposed Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes at Fort Belknap by the previous 1938 Minerals Leasing Act. The 1982 Act further provides that FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION The Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was created in 1887 as the home for the individual Indian allottees may join agreements negotiated for tribal lands. The Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Indian Tribes. The ancestors of these tribes have section entitled Operating Regulations discusses the procedures for obtaining lived on the northern plains for several centuries. The Assiniboine were allottee participance in the negotiated agreement. recognized by Europeans as part of the great Sioux Nation and speak a Siouan Principal components for the formal corporate proposal should include the TRIBAL HEADQUARTERS: Fort Belknap Agency, Montana language. However, their name is taken from a Chippewa word referring to area(s) of interest, type of contract, elaboration of proposed agreement terms, GEOLOGIC SETTING: Williston Basin "those who cook with stones." At some point in time the Assiniboine bands points of potential negotiation, diligence commitments (i.e. drilling), bonus broke with the traditional Sioux and allied themselves with the Cree.
  • Oil and Gas Potential of the Red River Formation, Southwestern North Dakota Timothy O

    Oil and Gas Potential of the Red River Formation, Southwestern North Dakota Timothy O

    Oil and Gas Potential of the Red River Formation, Southwestern North Dakota Timothy O. Nesheim Introduction North Dakota has experienced commercial oil and gas production third highest for the state, a bronze medal so to speak, and is from 19 different geologic formations over the past 65 years. only eclipsed by the “gold” medal Bakken-Three Forks Formations Most of these productive formations have experienced spotlight (>1.2 billion barrels of oil) and the “silver” medal Madison Group attention from the oil and gas industry at one time or another, (Mission Canyon & Charles Formations, ~1 billion barrels of oil). and, whether for a few months or years, were considered a “hot Red River production is also regionally extensive and stretches play” to explore and develop. The unconventional Bakken-Three into northwestern South Dakota, eastern Montana, and southern Forks development is a current example of a play that brought Saskatchewan (fig. 1). oil and gas activity in the state to record levels and has sustained drilling activity even in a depressed oil and gas market. As the Summary of Red River Oil and Gas Production oil and gas industry transitions beyond the Bakken over time and The upper Red River consists of four, vertically stacked, oil- begins to spend more time evaluating the other 17 productive productive sedimentary rock layers referred to informally as the non-Bakken/Three Forks Formations, additional oil and gas plays “A” through “D” zones (fig. 2). Just over half of the Red River’s will emerge across western North Dakota. One formation that oil production has come from horizontal wells drilled within the has previously experienced “hot play” status and may be poised “B” zone of southwestern Bowman County, a prolific oil play to one day re-emerge into the spotlight of the oil and gas industry that emerged during the late 1990s and was North Dakota’s “hot is the deeply buried Red River Formation.
  • The Dinosaur Park - Bearpaw Formation Transition in the Cypress Hills Region of Southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada Meagan M

    The Dinosaur Park - Bearpaw Formation Transition in the Cypress Hills Region of Southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada Meagan M

    The Dinosaur Park - Bearpaw Formation Transition in the Cypress Hills Region of Southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada Meagan M. Gilbert Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan; [email protected] Summary The Upper Cretaceous Dinosaur Park Formation (DPF) is a south- and eastward-thinning fluvial to marginal marine clastic-wedge in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The DPF is overlain by the Bearpaw Formation (BF), a fully marine clastic succession representing the final major transgression of the epicontinental Western Interior Seaway (WIS) across western North America. In southwestern Saskatchewan, the DPF is comprised of marginal marine coal, carbonaceous shale, and heterolithic siltstone and sandstone grading vertically into marine sandstone and shale of the Bearpaw Formation. Due to Saskatchewan’s proximity to the paleocoastline, 5th order transgressive cycles resulted in the deposition of multiple coal seams (Lethbridge Coal Zone; LCZ) in the upper two-thirds of the DPF in the study area. The estimated total volume of coal is 48109 m3, with a gas potential of 46109 m3 (Frank, 2005). The focus of this study is to characterize the facies and facies associations of the DPF, the newly erected Manâtakâw Member, and the lower BF in the Cypress Hills region of southwestern Saskatchewan utilizing core, outcrop, and geophysical well log data. This study provides a comprehensive sequence stratigraphic overview of the DPF-BF transition in Saskatchewan and the potential for coalbed methane exploration. Introduction The Dinosaur Park and Bearpaw Formations in Alberta, and its equivalents in Montana, have been the focus of several sedimentologic and stratigraphic studies due to exceptional outcrop exposure and extensive subsurface data (e.g., McLean, 1971; Wood, 1985, 1989; Eberth and Hamblin, 1993; Tsujita, 1995; Catuneanu et al., 1997; Hamblin, 1997; Rogers et al., 2016).
  • The Fauna from the Tyrannosaurus Rex Excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan

    The Fauna from the Tyrannosaurus Rex Excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan

    The Fauna from the Tyrannosaurus rex Excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan Tim T. Tokaryk 1 and Harold N. Bryant 2 Tokaryk, T.T. and Bryant, H.N. (2004): The fauna from the Tyrannosaurus rex excavation, Frenchman Formation (Late Maastrichtian), Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2004, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-18, 12p. Abstract The quarry that contained the partial skeleton of the Tyrannosaurus rex, familiarly known as “Scotty,” has yielded a diverse faunal and floral assemblage. The site is located in the Frenchman River valley in southwestern Saskatchewan and dates from approximately 65 million years, at the end of the Cretaceous Period. The faunal assemblage from the quarry is reviewed and the floral assemblage is summarized. Together, these assemblages provide some insight into the biological community that lived in southwestern Saskatchewan during the latest Cretaceous. Keywords: Frenchman Formation, Maastrichtian, Late Cretaceous, southwestern Saskatchewan, Tyrannosaurus rex. 1. Introduction a) Geological Setting The Frenchman Formation, of latest Maastrichtian age, is extensively exposed in southwestern Saskatchewan (Figure 1; Fraser et al., 1935; Furnival, 1950). The lithostratigraphic units in the formation consist largely of fluvial sandstones and greenish grey to green claystones. Outcrops of the Frenchman Formation are widely distributed in the Frenchman River valley, southeast of Eastend. Chambery Coulee, on the north side of the valley, includes Royal Saskatchewan Museum (RSM) locality 72F07-0022 (precise locality data on file with the RSM), the site that contained the disarticulated skeleton of a Tyrannosaurus rex. McIver (2002) subdivided the stratigraphic sequence at this locality into “lower” and “upper” beds.
  • Reservoir Characterization and Modelling of Potash Mine Injection Wells in Saskatchewan

    Reservoir Characterization and Modelling of Potash Mine Injection Wells in Saskatchewan

    RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELLING OF POTASH MINE INJECTION WELLS IN SASKATCHEWAN A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Civil, Geological and Environmental Engineering University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By DAVID PHILLIPS Copyright David Phillips, December, 2018. All rights reserved PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis/dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis/dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis/dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis/dissertation in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Civil, Geological and Environmental Engineering University of Saskatchewan 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9, Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5C9, Canada i ABSTRACT In the Saskatchewan potash mining industry vast quantities of brine wastewater are generated from potash processing and mine inflow water.
  • Petroleum System Modeling of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin – Isopach Grid Files

    Petroleum System Modeling of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin – Isopach Grid Files

    Petroleum System Modeling of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin – Isopach Grid Files By Debra K. Higley1, Mitchell E. Henry, and Laura N.R. Roberts Report Series 2005-1421 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 Inquiries about this publication should be addressed to: Debra K. Higley U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939, Box 25046 Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Tel: 303-236-5791 Email: [email protected] 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2005 For products and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS–the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Debra K. Higley, Mitchell Henry, and Laura N.R. Roberts, 2006, Petroleum System Modeling of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin – Isopach Grid Files: U.S. Geological Survey Report Series 2005-1421, web publication and associated data files. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. 2 Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 3 Data Processing Steps …………………………………………….……. 4 Acknowledgments ………………………………….………………..…. 5 Zmap-Format Grid Files ..………………………….………………..…. 5 References and Software Cited …………………….……………..…….