DOCSLIB.ORG

“America & Islam After Bush” Dr. Vali Nasr Council on Foreign Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“America & Islam After Bush” Dr. Vali Nasr Council on Foreign Relations ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “America & Islam After Bush” Dr. Vali Nasr Council on Foreign Relations Jeffrey Goldberg The Atlantic December 2008 MICHAEL CROMARTIE: Professor Nasr is one of the leading scholars on politics and religion in the Middle East, and his books are cited as the best on the topic, especially his recent book, The Shia Revival. We’re delighted, Professor Nasr, that you could be with us this morning. Thank you for coming. VALI NASR: Good morning, it’s great to be here. For our discussion today, I want raise a number of issues I think will be important in considering how a new administration may approach the thorny issues in the region and how religion fits into those. It goes without saying that two major challenges, or threat areas, face the new administration. One of them is encapsulated in the Iranian challenge, although beyond the nuclear issue we have very little grasp of what that actually means. I would like to delve much more into that. The second challenge revolves around the question of al- Qaeda, which we know a lot more about and maybe have a better grip on. A key issue that has bedeviled American foreign policy and is a challenge for the new administration is, first of all, to understand the nature of each of these threats, but more importantly to understand how they relate to one another. Are they the same, or are they different? And which is actually more of a threat, and in what regard? How do they impact one another? We have to think about these questions to avoid going around and around, and still find ourselves back to where we were at the beginning. Answering these questions are key, not just for American policymakers, but also for the American public, to bring us to a level of understanding beyond the one that we’re currently at. ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “America & Islam After Bush” Dr. Vali Nasr and Jeffrey Goldberg December 2008 The world has changed significantly since 2003, as we know. The Middle East has changed in a very significant way. Part of the problem is we have never really understood we are dealing, post-Iraq, with Middle East 2.0: that there are some fundamental, and in my opinion irreversible, shifts in the balance of power of the region. First, there is a palpable, significant, and, I think for the time being, irreversible shift of power and importance from the Levant — the area of Lebanon, Palestine, Israel, Egypt and Syria — to the Persian Gulf and the Afghanistan/Pakistan corridor. The region that for 50 years was the basis of our foreign policy — we thought its conflicts mattered most, our alliances there mattered most — does not matter as much to peace and security anymore. When the Lebanon war happened in 2006, the country that had most to do with it was not in the neighborhood. It was Iran. The countries in that neighborhood could do nothing to stop the war, and this was attested to by Israel, the United States and the regional powers themselves. Everybody today thinks the Palestinian issue has to be solved because it is a surrogate to solving a bigger problem, which is somewhere else in the region. Once upon a time we used to think — and some people still do — that the Arab-Israeli conflict is the key to solving all the problem of the regions: terrorism, al-Qaeda, Iran or Iraq. I don’t believe so. I think the Persian Gulf is the key to solving the Arab-Israeli issue. All the powers that matter — Iran, Saudi Arabia, and even the good news of the region: Dubai, Abu Dhabi, et cetera — are all in the Gulf. And all the conflicts that matter to us — Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran — are in the Gulf and then to the east. So the Arab-centeredness of the Muslim Middle East is gone. We haven’t caught up to that in our foreign policy. The Middle East now is far more Iranian and Pakistani and Afghani in terms of the strategic mental map we have to deal with. Trying to deal with the Middle East as if we’re in 2002, before the Iraq war, is one of the main reasons why we haven’t been able to bring the right force to bear on the problems in the region. The second shift, connected to this, is a palpable movement from the Arab world toward Iran. The Arab world has declined very clearly in its stature and power; Iran is a rising force. You don’t have to take my word; just listen to the Iranians and the Arab leaders. You don’t hear the Iranians worried about the Arab world; you don’t hear a single Iranian leader express any kind of anxiety; in fact, in a very patronizing way they constantly say 2 ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “America & Islam After Bush” Dr. Vali Nasr and Jeffrey Goldberg December 2008 to Arab countries, “don’t worry, we’ll take care of you. You don’t need to rely on the United States; we’ll protect you.” Then listen to Arab leaders. The first thing every American official hears when he or she arrives in an Arab capital is worry about Iran. It’s clear that the balance of power — and a lot of power is a matter of perception — has moved eastward. The center of gravity has moved eastward. It’s a problem for us because most of our alliance investments were to the west, in the Arab world. Now, those alliances have not done for us as much as we hoped they could, even in the Arab-Israeli issue, where they were supposed to be the ones providing all the help. The third and connected shift is that after Iraq there is a palpable shift in the religio- political sphere from the Sunnis to the Shias, a sect of Islam that has been completely invisible to us. We all of a sudden discovered them, but I don’t think we quite understand what we discovered and what it means for us going forward. A fourth, related shift is that many of the conflicts we are dealing with, in both Iraq and Afghanistan, involve insurgent Sunni forces. The losers in America’s battles in this region are not evenly distributed among the actors I’m mentioning. The Sunni powers, the Arab powers, have clearly lost as a consequence of our wars of choice and necessity in Afghanistan and Iraq. Iran and its allies and the Shia forces have clearly gained. So when we look at Iraq and Afghanistan, we’re essentially facing revanchist forces — forces who lost and refuse to accept what has happened and believe they can come back. All of these dynamics are now embedded in the power structure of the region, namely this Shia-Sunni issue. The Arab-Iranian issue is encapsulated in the Saudi-Iranian rivalry around the Gulf and in Iranian-Arab rivalry over the future of Lebanon and the Palestinian issue. These conflict-area issues are going to continuously reflect those dynamics. Lebanon, for instance, is going to reflect the power play in this region. The winners and losers in these wars are not only the local people. A larger force has been unleashed since the Iraq war. This Iranian-versus-Arab, Shia-versus-Sunni, Persian Gulf powers-versus-the Levant dynamic is going to play itself out. The insurgencies going against the United States are also connected to this, because, as I mentioned, they are intent on turning back the clock in the Middle East to before 2003. So these insurgencies will be ongoing until the 3 ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “America & Islam After Bush” Dr. Vali Nasr and Jeffrey Goldberg December 2008 final shape of this region is settled. It’s not just a matter of troop numbers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Again, we’re dealing with something larger going on in this region. Connecting these geo-strategic issues to what’s happened in this region religiously is very important. We talk about Iran and Saudi Arabia as countries in secular terms, but in the mental map of Muslims, they also represent two large civilizational blocks within Islam. Namely, Iran stands for Shia power, whether or not it wears it on its sleeve. Saudi Arabia and the Arab world essentially represent the Sunni face of Islam. In many ways we think there is a single Islamic threat out there, but that’s not the case. There is an intense rivalry between these two sects of Islam, between both the radical elements of each and the establishment elements of each. This civilizational or cultural or religious battle within Islam is now very clearly tied to everything that’s happened after Iraq. Therefore it is not going to stop, because it’s not a matter of getting a couple of clerics in a room to say nice things about one another; it’s not an ecumenical exercise. There is a huge power play associated with this. We all know how Iraq opened this fissure. It ended up being a turning point for a variety of reasons. First, it is of symbolic value: Post-Saddam Iraq is the first Shia Arab state in history. That represents a major turning of the tide. Now, 60 to 65 percent of Iraq is Shia, which means about 80 percent of its Arab population is Shia. In Lebanon, 30 to 40 percent of the population may be Shia, which makes it the single largest community in the country. Seventy-five percent of Bahrain is Shia, and 10 percent of Saudi Arabia is Shia, roughly speaking.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sunni – Shi`A Relations and the Implications for Belgium and Europe
    FEARING A ‘SHIITE OCTOPUS’ SUNNI – SHI`A RELATIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR BELGIUM AND EUROPE EGMONT PAPER 35 FEARING A ‘SHIITE OCTOPUS’ Sunni – Shi`a relations and the implications for Belgium and Europe JELLE PUELINGS January 2010 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont - The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1538 9 D/2010/4804/17 U 1384 NUR1 754 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Vali Nasr Webcast and Discussion Guide
    Webcast: Exploring 9/11 – The World Before and After Supplementary Materials Vali Nasr discusses the history, identity, and changing political role of Shi’ites in the Middle East. This and all of our webcasts can be found at www.national911memorial.org/new_history_exploring. The Speaker Vali Nasr is a professor of International Relations at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, and a Senior Adjunct Fellow in Middle East Affairs at the Council of Foreign Relations. Review Questions Key Figures and Vocabulary CHAPTER 1: Nasr discusses the effects of the 2003 war in Iraq on the distribution of power between Shi’a and Sunni Muslims in Abu Bakr that country. The Prophet Mohammad’s father- 1. Describe the distribution of power in Iraq before the war. in-law and close adviser; became 2. How is the Shi’a population distributed throughout the the first caliph in 632 C.E. after the Middle East? prophet’s death. CHAPTER 2: Nasr describes the differences between the Sunni Ali and Shi’a Muslims, both historically and today. Mohammad’s cousin and son-in- 1. Explain the crux of the Sunni/Shi’a schism. law; became the fourth caliph in 656 C.E. Shi’ites consider him to 2. How did this division eventually result in two different be the first Imam, and his cultures with distinct values and practices? descendants to be the rightful successors to the caliphate. CHAPTER 3: Nasr discusses the Shi’a beliefs and traditions that set them apart from other adherents of Islam. Ayatollah 1. Describe the Shi’a identity and worldview as Nasr Title signifying a high ranking describes it.
    [Show full text]
  • Shia and Iranian Ascendance
    AUGUST 2007 IPCS Research Papers SShhiiaa aanndd IIr raanniiaann AAsscceennddaannccee:: SSuunnnnii aanndd AAmm eerriiccaann PPeerrcceeppttiioonnss SSrriinnjjooyy BBoossee IInnssttiittuuttee ooff PPeeaaccee aanndd CCoonnfflliicctt SSttuuddiieess NNeeww DDee-l li hh- ii,, IINNDDIIAA © 2007, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies is not responsible for the facts, views or opinion expressed by the author. The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), established in August 1996, is an independent think tank devoted to research on peace and security from a South Asian perspective. Its aim is to develop a comprehensive and alternative framework for peace and security in the region catering to the changing demands of national, regional and global security. Address: B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi 110029 INDIA Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 4165 2560 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ipcs.org CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Sunni Fears....................................................................................................................... 2 American Suspicions and Manoeuvres ........................................................................ 5 Is there a Shia Crescent? The Iranian Perspective...................................................... 8 Prospects for Accommodation ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PREFACE 1 . Said Amir Arjomand, the Shadow of God and the Hidden
    N o t e s P REFACE 1 . S a i d A m i r A r jomand, The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam; Religion, Political Order, and Social Change in Shi’ite Iran from the Beginning to 1890 (Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1984), 270. 1 THE STORY OF THE SHI’A 1 . H a m i d Enayat, “Shi’ism and Sunnism,” in Shi’ism: Doctrines, Thoughts, and Spiritualityy, ed. Seyyed Hossein Nasr (New York: State University of New York Press, 1988), 79–80; Rudi Matthee, “The Egyptian Opposition to the Iranian Revolution,” in Shi’ism and Social Protestt , eds. Juan R. I. Cole and Nikki R. Keddie (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986), 248; Michael Axworthy, I ran, Empire of the Mind—A History from Zoroaster to the Present Day (London: Penguin Books, 2007), 201–203. 2 . A x w o r t hy, Iran, Empire of the Mindd, 178. 3 . Karen Barkey, “Islam and Toleration: Studying the Ottoman Imperial Model,” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Societyy, vol. 19, no. 1/2 (December 2005), 10; Bruce Masters, “The Treaties of Erzurum ( 1823 and 1848) and the Changing Status of Iranians in the Ottoman,” Iranian Studiess , vol. 24, no. 1/4 (1991), 7–8; R. I. Cole and Moojan Momen, “Mafia, Mob and Shiism in Iraq: The Rebellion of Ottoman Karbala 1824–1843,” Past & Present , no. 112 (August 1986), 116; Juan R. I. Cole, “‘Indian Money’ and the Shi’i Shrine Cities of Iraq, 1786–1850,” Middle Eastern Studiess, vol. 22, no. 4 (October 1986), 470.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximilian Terhalle
    TERHALLE: ARE THE SHIA RISING? ARE THE SHIA RISING? Maximilian Terhalle Dr. Terhalle serves as an expert on the Gulf region with the German Army. This essay reflects entirely his own opinions. The author would like to thank Professor Gregory Gause (University of Vermont) for reading the final draft and enriching the assessment. n an article published in The Persian Gulf6 — has become more promi- Washington Post on November 29, nent in the last six years due to three 2006, a security adviser to King interwoven developments. Abdullah of Saudi Arabia stressed the The first is the strengthening of Iran’s I geopolitical position after the fall of the inevitable necessity for a “massive Saudi intervention”1 to shield the kingdom’s Sunni Taliban and Saddam Hussein and its brethren against any Shia-supported attempt to diversify its bilateral relations in expulsion should Iraq split up. Even though the Gulf afterwards. The second is the Nawaf Obaid was dismissed shortly increase in Shia awareness, precipitated by afterwards, presumably for his boldness, the U.S. democratization plans, in countries his words reflected the king’s use of the where major parts of the populations are term “Shia crescent” renewed during the followers of Ali (Shiat Ali).7 The third is visit of Vice President Cheney last Novem- the decline of U.S. power in Iraq, linked to ber. Previously, Jordan’s King Abdullah and Iran’s successful defiance of international Egypt’s President Mubarak had pointed in pressure to halt its nuclear program, as the same direction. Moreover, “Iran’s well as its subsequent rhetorical hubris, nuclear ambitions”2 prompted the leaders which increasingly frightens its neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: the New Claimant to Regional Power?
    Iran: The New Claimant to Regional Power? AN INTERVIEW WITH VALI NASR Vali Nasr is Professorat the Naval PostgraduateSchool, Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, and Senior Fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and InternationalAffairs at the John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Beginning in the fall of 2007, he will be Professor of InternationalPolitics at The Fletcher School. Dr. Nasr is a specialist on political and social developments in the Muslim world and is the author offive books, including The Shia Revival: How Conflicts within Islam will Shape the Future (2006) and Democracy in Iran: History and the Quest for Liberty (2006), as well as numerous articles in academicjournals and encyclopedias. His works have been trans- lated into Arabic, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Indonesian, Italian, Turkish, Persian, Chinese, and Urdu. Dr. Nasr has also written for The New York Times, The New Republic, Time, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Affairs, Los Angeles Times, and The Washington Post, and has provided commentary to nationaland internationalmedia. He has been the recipient of grantsfrom the John D. and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation,The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, and the Social Science Research Council. He is a CarnegieScholar for 2006 Dr. Nasr received his B.A. from Tufts University in International Relations summa cum laude and was initiated into Phi Beta Kappa in 1983. He earned his master's degreefrom The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy in internationaleconomics and Middle East studies in 1984, and his Ph.D. from MIT in politicalscience in 1991. The Fletcher Forum spoke with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Political Theory of Sectarianism in the Middle East
    Toward a Political Theory of Sectarianism in the Middle East: The Salience of Authoritarianism over Theology Author(s): Nader Hashemi Source: Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (May 2016), pp. 65-76 Published by: Indiana University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jims.1.1.05 Accessed: 28-09-2016 21:08 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jims.1.1.05?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Indiana University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies This content downloaded from 73.95.133.62 on Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:08:53 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Toward a Political Theory of Sectarianism in the Middle East: The Salience of Authoritarianism over Theology Nader Hashemi Abstract: In his critically acclaimed book, Th e Shi’a Revival: How Confl icts within Islam Will Shape the Future, Vali Nasr has suggested that traditional concepts and cat- egories used to explicate the Middle East, such as modernity, democracy, fundamen- talism and nationalism, no longer adequately explain the politics of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Policy 14, No. 1 (2019)
    the national bureau of asian research 14 1 asia policy a u s volume 14 number 1 i january 2019 a special issue p o On the U.S.-India Partnership l India and the United States i Walter C. Ladwig III and Anit Mukherjee (guest editors) c South Asia y Constantino Xavier Southeast Asia january 2019 january Walter C. Ladwig III and Anit Mukherjee The Indo-Pacific Sinderpal Singh Iran Sumitha Narayanan Kutty Defense Cooperation Cara Abercrombie roundtable Japan’s Relations in Northeast Asia under Shinzo Abe James D.J. Brown, Shin Kawashima, June Teufel Dreyer, Yoshihide Soeya, Tomohiko Taniguchi the national bureau of asian research 1414 ne 42nd street, suite 300 book review roundtable seatthetl enational, washi nbureaugton 98105 http://asiapolicy.nbr.org asian research httofp://www.nbr.org Anthony Ware and Costas Laoutides’s http://asiapolicy.nbr.org Myanmar’s ‘Rohingya’ Conflict asia policy • http://asiapolicy.nbr.org • a peer-reviewed journal devoted to bridging the gap between academic research and policymaking on issues related to the Asia-Pacific editors C. Christine Fair and Mark W. Frazier editors Georgetown University The New School Jessica Keough managing editor Joshua Ziemkowski copy and style editor Sophia Ahn editorial assistant Dylan Plung publications intern editorial advisory committee Bhubhindar Singh Matthew Sussex Michael Wills S. Rajaratnam School of National Security College, The National Bureau of International Studies Australian National University Asian Research Mark Frazier C. Christine Fair The New School Georgetown
    [Show full text]
  • American Foreign Policy in Retreat Vali Nasr - Book Pdf Free
    PDF The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy In Retreat Vali Nasr - book pdf free Free Download The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Full Popular Vali Nasr, Pdf Books The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, Read The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Full Collection, Free Download The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Full Popular Vali Nasr, Download The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat PDF, Download The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat PDF, pdf Vali Nasr The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat PDF Download, The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat PDF, Vali Nasr epub The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, Download The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat E-Books, by Vali Nasr pdf The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, Read The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Online Free, Read Online The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat E-Books, pdf download The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Free Download, PDF The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Popular Download, Download Free The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Book, PDF The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat Full Collection, Download pdf The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, CLICK HERE - DOWNLOAD mobi, pdf, azw, kindle Description: From the work of Lon Estevez to a memoir by Jean-Pierre Dsanguancier that was written in France following her conversion from religious into socialistic Christianity for which he had dedicated his entire personal education and also contributed to this remarkable passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrine and Historical Places
    APPRAISAL OF MARYAM JAMEELAH’S THOUGHT BY CONTEMPORARY INTELLIGENTSIA Muhammad Ali Zafar* Mohy ud din Hashmi ** ABSTRACT: Maryam Jameelah was an American convert to Islam. She was a prolific writer, besides producing hundreds of the articles and book reviews; she authored about thirty eight books. She focused her writings on the cultural and civilizational issues of Islam and the West. She refuted the Western philosophies of modernism, atheism, secularism and humanism in her writings. Jameelah’s thought carries a significant impact on the shaping of contemporary Muslim thought. This research paper will present an appraisal of Maryam Jameelah’s thought by the contemporary intelligentsia. The introduction of Jameelah’s corpus and a detailed demonstration of her thought is out of the scope of this paper. Keywords: Islam, West, Movement, Philosphy, Thought Maryam Jameelah (formerly Margaret Marcus) born in 1934 in the suburb of New York. This epoch is marked by the Great Depression in the American history. She belonged to the fourth generation of German Jewish descent. She was brought up in the Westchester; an affluent suburb of New York. She was raised in a secular American environment and acquired usual education at the local public schools.1 Unlike the young girls of her age she rejected every sign of the vulgarity and maintained her chastity in a remarkable manner. Maryam Jameelah studied Islamic literature in depth at the age of nineteen years and started the correspondence with many Muslim scholars, * Ph.D.scholar, Department of Islamic Thought, History and Culture, AIOU, Islamabad, Pakistan ** Professor, Department of Islamic Thought, Department of Arabic and Islamic Studies, AIOU, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shia Revival. How Conflicts Within Islam Will Shape the Future by Vali Nasr, W
    The Shia Revival. How Conflicts Within Islam Will Shape the Future by Vali Nasr, W. W. Norton & Company, 2007, 287 pp. Zora Hesová Alongside the fierce resistance against the occupation, another surprise of the Iraq venture of great consequence that requires explanation and assessment is the political rise of the Shia’s and their clash with the Sunni establishment, in Iraq and beyond. Vali Nasr, a professor at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California and a 2006 fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations is convinced not only that the development of Shia-Sunni relations is of paramount consequence for the region, but also that the public is so unfamiliar with the Shia and the nature of their so-called sectarian conflict with the Sunni, that an introduction is needed. In this engaging book he gives just that: an admirably informed and succinct introduction to a little understood aspect of Middle East politics. The new Shia politics While the Pentagon felt confident that it would find a friendly Shia majority upon entering Iraq – and interpreted a purported fatwa from their leading cleric as an endorsement of the deposition of Saddam and the advent of freedom – sectarian lines were already forming in Iraq. One of the Pentagon’s mistakes was to believe Iraq would be like post-war Germany or Japan: a decimated population thirsting for justice and freedom. Instead, they faced communities preparing for a restitution of their influence on power. The democratisation that the US-led war was to bring to the Middle East through Iraq actually revitalised communitarian politics in Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Affairs , January/February 2008
    The Costs of Containing Iran Washington's Misguided New Middle East Policy By Vali Nasr and Ray Takeyh From Foreign Affairs , January/February 2008 Summary: The Bush administration wants to contain Iran by rallying the support of Sunni Arab states and now sees Iran's containment as the heart of its Middle East policy: a way to stabilize Iraq, declaw Hezbollah, and restart the Arab-Israeli peace process. But the strategy is unsound and impractical, and it will probably further destabilize an already volatile region. Vali Nasr, Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and Adjunct Senior Fellow for the Middle East at the Council on Foreign Relations, is the author of "The Shia Revival: How Conflicts Within Islam Will Shape the Future." Ray Takeyh is a Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and the author of "Hidden Iran: Paradox and Power in the Islamic Republic." Over the past year, Washington has come to see the containment of Iran as the primary objective of its Middle East policy. It holds Tehran responsible for rising violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, Lebanon's tribulations, and Hamas' intransigence and senses that the balance of power in the region is shifting toward Iran and its Islamist allies. Curbing Tehran's growing influence is thus necessary for regional security. Vice President Dick Cheney announced this new direction last May on the deck of the U.S.S. John C. Stennis in the Persian Gulf. "We'll stand with our friends in opposing extremism and strategic threats," Cheney said.
    [Show full text]