Role of PUM RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of PUM RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer cancers Review Role of PUM RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer Maciej J. Smialek * , Erkut Ilaslan , Marcin P. Sajek and Jadwiga Jaruzelska * Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 32, 60-479 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] (E.I.); [email protected] (M.P.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.J.S.); [email protected] (J.J.) Simple Summary: PUM1 and PUM2 are RNA-binding Pumilio proteins controlling the accessibility of hundreds of mRNAs for translation in a variety of human tissues. As a result, PUMs exemplify one of the mechanisms safeguarding the cellular proteome. PUM expression is disturbed in can- cer, resulting in dysregulation of their target mRNAs. These targets encode factors responsible for processes usually affected in cancer, such as proliferation, apoptosis, and the cell cycle. This review describes PUM1 and PUM2 ribonucleoprotein networks and highlights the mechanisms underlying the regulatory role of PUM proteins and, most importantly, the emerging impact of PUM dysregulation in cancer. It also emphasizes the importance of upcoming studies on PUM proteins in the context of cancer, as they may provide new therapeutic targets in the future. Abstract: Until recently, post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR), in contrast to transcriptional regulation, was not extensively explored in cancer, even though it seems to be highly important. PUM proteins are well described in the PTGR of several organisms and contain the PUF RNA-binding domain that recognizes the UGUANAUA motif, located mostly in the 30 untranslated region (30UTR) of target mRNAs. Depending on the protein cofactors recruited by PUM proteins, target mRNAs are directed towards translation, repression, activation, degradation, or specific localization. Abnormal profiles of PUM expression have been shown in several types of cancer, in some of them being different for PUM1 and PUM2. This review summarizes the dysregulation of PUM1 and PUM2 expression in several cancer tissues. It also describes the regulatory mechanisms behind the activity Citation: Smialek, M.J.; Ilaslan, E.; of PUMs, including cooperation with microRNA and non-coding RNA machineries, as well as the Sajek, M.P.; Jaruzelska, J. Role of PUM alternative polyadenylation pathway. It also emphasizes the importance of future studies to gain RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer. a more complete picture of the role of PUM proteins in different types of cancer. Such studies may Cancers 2021 13 , , 129. result in identification of novel targets for future cancer therapies. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13 010129 Keywords: cancer; mRNA; PUM proteins; post-transcriptional gene regulation; PTGR; 30 untrans- lated regions; 30UTR Received: 5 November 2020 Accepted: 31 December 2020 Published: 3 January 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- 1. Introduction tral with regard to jurisdictional clai- A large body of knowledge regarding genetic mutations and associated transcriptional ms in published maps and institutio- dysregulation, which is critical for carcinogenesis, has been accumulated in recent decades. nal affiliations. Although growing evidence indicates that dysregulation of post-transcriptional gene ex- pression plays a highly important role in cancer as well, with the exception of microRNAs this role has been neglected. Post-transcriptional gene expression regulation (PTGR) mainly encompasses RNA processing, which takes place beyond transcription, starting in the nu- Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li- cleus and continuing in the cytoplasm [1]. The main nuclear RNA processing steps consist censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 0 0 This article is an open access article of 7-methylguanosine cap synthesis on the 5 -end of pre-mRNA, generation of the 3 -end distributed under the terms and con- by cleavage and polyadenylation, including alternative polyadenylation (APA), and a mul- ditions of the Creative Commons At- tistep splicing reaction that removes introns and produces mature mRNA molecules. These tribution (CC BY) license (https:// nuclear RNA processing events are mediated by a multitude of RNA-binding proteins 0 creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ (RBPs) that associate with the nascent mRNA as soon as the 5 -end is transcribed via RNA 4.0/). polymerase II catalysis [2]. As is now well-known, a variety of RBPs are dysregulated in Cancers 2021, 13, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010129 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Cancers 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 13 Cancers 2021, 13, 129 2 of 13 is transcribed via RNA polymerase II catalysis [2]. As is now well-known, a variety of differentRBPs are cancerdysregulated types (for in adifferent review, seecancer [3]). types This review(for a review, focuses see on [3] Pumilio). This proteins, review foc PUM1uses andon Pumilio PUM2, proteins, which represent PUM1 and well-described PUM2, which examples represent of well RBPs-described playing examples a role in PTGR of RBPs in metazoans,playing a role including in PTGR humans in metazoans, (for a review, including see [humans4]), as well (for as a inreview, plants see [5]. [4] There), as iswell accu- as mulatingin plants evidence[5]. There now is accumulating that expression evidence of PUM proteinsnow that is expression dysregulated of inPUM several prot cancerseins is (fordysregulated a review, seein several [4]). PUM cancers proteins (for a contain review, a see C-terminal [4]). PUM highly proteins conserved contain PUFa C-terminal domain thathighly binds conserved to mRNA PUF molecules. domain that This binds domain to mRNA consists molecules. of eight imperfect This domain tandem consists repeats of ofeight 36 aminoimperfect acids tandem (aa) (Figure repeats1). of These 36 amino repeats acids form (aa a) curved(Figure structure,1). These eachrepeats of whichform a iscurved in contact structure, with each one of base which within is in a contact PUM-binding with one element base within (PBE)—an a PUM- eight-nucleotidebinding element conserved(PBE)—an motifeight-nucleotide UGUAHAUW, conserved located motif mostly UGUAHAUW, in the 30 untranslated located mostly region in (3 the0UTR) 3′ un- of targettranslated mRNAs region (Figure (3′UTR1)[)6 of–9 target]. mRNAs (Figure 1) [6–9]. Figure 1. Models of human PUF1 and PUF2 RNA RNA-binding-binding domain crystal structure in complex with PUM PUM-binding-binding element (PBE)(PBE) ofof p38p38αα mRNAmRNA target.target. Left panel—cartoonpanel—cartoon model of PUF1 structure in a complexcomplex with PBEPBE ofof p38p38αα mRNAmRNA (PDB(PDB id:3Q0M);id:3Q0M); middlemiddle panel—cartoonpanel—cartoon model of PUF2PUF2 structure in a complexcomplex withwith PBEPBE ofof p38p38αα mRNAmRNA (PDB(PDB id:3Q0R);id:3Q0R); rightright panel—overlaypanel—overlay of tube models of PUF1 (blue)(blue) andand PUF2PUF2 (yellow)(yellow) structuresstructures in complexcomplex withwith PBEPBE ofof p38p38αα mRNA.mRNA. TheThe overlay panelpanel shows a more open PUF1 compared to the PUF2-domain,PUF2-domain, bindingbinding thethe same PBE of p38p38αα mRNA. Visualized models werewere obtainedobtained using using BioRender.com BioRender.com from from 3Q0M 3Q0M and and 3Q0R 3Q0R PDB PDB structures structures [10]. [10]. PUF—PUM PUF—PUM RNA-binding RNA-binding domain; do- main; PBE—PUM binding element UGUAHAUW; PDB—Protein Database Bank. PBE—PUM binding element UGUAHAUW; PDB—Protein Database Bank. While the original Drosophila melanogaster PUM proteinprotein is unique, there areare severalseveral Pum proteins that exist in yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans,, andand otherother modelmodel organisms.organisms. ThereThere are two PUM genes in humans on chromosomes 1 and 2 called PUM1 and PUM2,, respec- tively, and they they encode encode PUM1 PUM1 and and PUM2 PUM2 proteins, proteins, respe respectivelyctively (for (for a review, a review, see [4] see). [The4]). Therate rateof the of overall the overall aa similarity aa similarity between between PUM1 PUM1 and PUM2 and PUM2 protein protein is 83%, is 83%,with the with PUF the- PUF-domaindomain being being 91% 91%identical identical [10]. [10 PUMs]. PUMs bind bind to todifferent different protein protein cofactors, cofactors, such such asas NANOS [[11],11], DAZ-likeDAZ-like(DAZL) (DAZL) [ 12[12],], and and DEAD-Box DEAD-Box Helicase Helicase 20 20 (DDX20) (DDX20 [13) [13].]. Binding Binding of PUMof PUM proteins proteins with with their their co-factors co-factors in in most most cases cases directs directsa a givengiven mRNAmRNA towards repres- sion, leading mostly to degradation.degradation. This binding, however, may also stabilize mRNA, activate translation, and/or and/or storage storage in in specific specific subcellular subcellular compartments compartments (F (Figureigure 22) )(for (for a areview, review, see see [4] [)4. ]).It has It has been been demonstrated demonstrated that that mRNA mRNA repression repression by PUM by PUM proteins proteins con- consistssists of the of thepromotion promotion of ofdeadenylation deadenylation [14 [14–16–16], ],and and in in some some cases cases,, also also decapping decapping [17]. [17]. Deadenylation is followed mostlymostly byby degradationdegradation [[18,19],18,19], whichwhich isis inin lineline withwith thethe findingfinding that the presence of PBEs is closely associated with lower mRNA stability [20–22]. This phenomenon was confirmed by studies in several human cell lines, such as U2OS, HEK293, Cancers 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 13 Cancers 2021, 13, 129 3 of 13 that the presence of PBEs is closely associated
Recommended publications
  • Alternative Polyadenylation in Triple-Negative Breast Tumors Allows NRAS and C-JUN to Bypass PUMILIO Post-Transcriptional Regulation
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 10, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0844 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Title: Alternative polyadenylation in triple-negative breast tumors allows NRAS and c-JUN to bypass PUMILIO post-transcriptional regulation Running Title: Alternative polyadenylation in triple-negative breast cancer Authors: Wayne O. Miles 1, 2, 7, Antonio Lembo 3, 4, Angela Volorio 5, Elena Brachtel 5, Bin Tian 6, Dennis Sgroi 5, Paolo Provero 3, 4 and Nicholas J. Dyson 1, 7 1 Department of Molecular Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. 2 Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 3 Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Italy. 4 Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 5 Pathology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. 6 Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA 7 Corresponding authors: [email protected] (N.D.) and [email protected] (W.O.M.) Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest. Financial Support 1 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 10, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0844 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Analysis of Genome and Transcriptome Alterations in Multiple Tumors Unveils Novel Cancer-Relevant Splicing Networks
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Large-scale analysis of genome and transcriptome alterations in multiple tumors unveils novel cancer-relevant splicing networks Endre Sebestyén,1,5 Babita Singh,1,5 Belén Miñana,1,2 Amadís Pagès,1 Francesca Mateo,3 Miguel Angel Pujana,3 Juan Valcárcel,1,2,4 and Eduardo Eyras1,4 1Universitat Pompeu Fabra, E08003 Barcelona, Spain; 2Centre for Genomic Regulation, E08003 Barcelona, Spain; 3Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), E08908 L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain; 4Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, E08010 Barcelona, Spain Alternative splicing is regulated by multiple RNA-binding proteins and influences the expression of most eukaryotic genes. However, the role of this process in human disease, and particularly in cancer, is only starting to be unveiled. We system- atically analyzed mutation, copy number, and gene expression patterns of 1348 RNA-binding protein (RBP) genes in 11 solid tumor types, together with alternative splicing changes in these tumors and the enrichment of binding motifs in the alter- natively spliced sequences. Our comprehensive study reveals widespread alterations in the expression of RBP genes, as well as novel mutations and copy number variations in association with multiple alternative splicing changes in cancer drivers and oncogenic pathways. Remarkably, the altered splicing patterns in several tumor types recapitulate those of undifferen- tiated cells. These patterns are predicted to be mainly controlled by MBNL1 and involve multiple cancer drivers, including the mitotic gene NUMA1. We show that NUMA1 alternative splicing induces enhanced cell proliferation and centrosome am- plification in nontumorigenic mammary epithelial cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanjay Kumar Gupta
    The human CCHC-type Zinc Finger Nucleic Acid Binding Protein (CNBP) binds to the G-rich elements in target mRNA coding sequences and promotes translation Das humane CCHC-Typ-Zinkfinger-Nukleinsäure-Binde-Protein (CNBP) bindet an G-reiche Elemente in der kodierenden Sequenz seiner Ziel-mRNAs und fördert deren Translation Doctoral thesis for a doctoral degree at the Graduate School of Life Sciences, Julius-Maximilians-Universität WürzBurg, Section: Biomedicine suBmitted By Sanjay Kumar Gupta from Varanasi, India WürzBurg, 2016 1 Submitted on: …………………………………………………………..…….. Office stamp Members of the Promotionskomitee: Chairperson: Prof. Dr. Alexander Buchberger Primary Supervisor: Dr. Stefan Juranek Supervisor (Second): Prof. Dr. Utz Fischer Supervisor (Third): Dr. Markus Landthaler Date of Public Defence: …………………………………………….………… Date of Receipt of Certificates: ………………………………………………. 2 Summary The genetic information encoded with in the genes are transcribed and translated to give rise to the functional proteins, which are building block of a cell. At first, it was thought that the regulation of gene expression particularly occurs at the level of transcription By various transcription factors. Recent discoveries have shown the vital role of gene regulation at the level of RNA also known as post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR). Apart from non-coding RNAs e.g. micro RNAs, various RNA Binding proteins (RBPs) play essential role in PTGR. RBPs have been implicated in different stages of mRNA life cycle ranging from splicing, processing, transport, localization and decay. In last 20 years studies have shown the presence of hundreds of RBPs across eukaryotic systems many of which are widely conserved. Given the rising numBer of RBPs and their link to human diseases it is quite evident that RBPs have major role in cellular processes and their regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Genome Microarray Detects Deletions and Loss of Heterozygosity of Chromosome 3 Occurring Exclusively in Metastasizing Uveal Melanoma
    Anatomy and Pathology Whole-Genome Microarray Detects Deletions and Loss of Heterozygosity of Chromosome 3 Occurring Exclusively in Metastasizing Uveal Melanoma Sarah L. Lake,1 Sarah E. Coupland,1 Azzam F. G. Taktak,2 and Bertil E. Damato3 PURPOSE. To detect deletions and loss of heterozygosity of disease is fatal in 92% of patients within 2 years of diagnosis. chromosome 3 in a rare subset of fatal, disomy 3 uveal mela- Clinical and histopathologic risk factors for UM metastasis noma (UM), undetectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization include large basal tumor diameter (LBD), ciliary body involve- (FISH). ment, epithelioid cytomorphology, extracellular matrix peri- ϩ ETHODS odic acid-Schiff-positive (PAS ) loops, and high mitotic M . Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification 3,4 5 (MLPA) with the P027 UM assay was performed on formalin- count. Prescher et al. showed that a nonrandom genetic fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) whole tumor sections from 19 change, monosomy 3, correlates strongly with metastatic death, and the correlation has since been confirmed by several disomy 3 metastasizing UMs. Whole-genome microarray analy- 3,6–10 ses using a single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray (aSNP) groups. Consequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed on frozen tissue samples from four fatal dis- (FISH) detection of chromosome 3 using a centromeric probe omy 3 metastasizing UMs and three disomy 3 tumors with Ͼ5 became routine practice for UM prognostication; however, 5% years’ metastasis-free survival. to 20% of disomy 3 UM patients unexpectedly develop metas- tases.11 Attempts have therefore been made to identify the RESULTS. Two metastasizing UMs that had been classified as minimal region(s) of deletion on chromosome 3.12–15 Despite disomy 3 by FISH analysis of a small tumor sample were found these studies, little progress has been made in defining the key on MLPA analysis to show monosomy 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Pluripotency by RNA Binding Proteins
    Cell Stem Cell Review Regulation of Pluripotency by RNA Binding Proteins Julia Ye1,2 and Robert Blelloch1,2,* 1The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA 2Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.08.010 Establishment, maintenance, and exit from pluripotency require precise coordination of a cell’s molecular machinery. Substantial headway has been made in deciphering many aspects of this elaborate system, particularly with respect to epigenetics, transcription, and noncoding RNAs. Less attention has been paid to posttranscriptional regulatory processes such as alternative splicing, RNA processing and modification, nuclear export, regulation of transcript stability, and translation. Here, we introduce the RNA binding proteins that enable the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression, summarizing current and ongoing research on their roles at different regulatory points and discussing how they help script the fate of pluripotent stem cells. Introduction RBPs are responsible for every event in the life of an RNA Embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which are derived from the inner molecule, including its capping, splicing, cleavage, nontem- cell mass of the mammalian blastocyst, are remarkable because plated nucleotide addition, nucleotide editing, nuclear export, they can propagate in vitro indefinitely while retaining both the cellular localization, stability, and translation (Keene, 2007). molecular identity and the pluripotent properties of the peri-im- Overall, little is known about RBPs: most are classified based plantation epiblast.
    [Show full text]
  • Galnt1 Is Required for Normal Heart Valve Development and Cardiac Function
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Galnt1 Is Required for Normal Heart Valve Development and Cardiac Function E Tian1‡, Sharon R. Stevens2‡, Yu Guan2, Danielle A. Springer3, Stasia A. Anderson3, Matthew F. Starost4, Vyomesh Patel5¤, Kelly G. Ten Hagen1, Lawrence A. Tabak2* 1 Developmental Glycobiology Section, Laboratory of Cell and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States of America, 2 Section on Biological Chemistry, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States of America, 3 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States of America, 4 Division of Veterinary Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States of America, 5 Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States of America ¤ Current address: Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia ‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract Congenital heart valve defects in humans occur in approximately 2% of live births and are a major source of compromised cardiac function. In this study we demonstrate that normal OPEN ACCESS heart valve development and cardiac function are dependent upon Galnt1, the gene that en- Citation: Tian E, Stevens SR, Guan Y, Springer DA, codes a member of the family of glycosyltransferases (GalNAc-Ts) responsible for the initia- Anderson SA, Starost MF, et al. (2015) Galnt1 Is tion of mucin-type O-glycosylation. In the adult mouse, compromised cardiac function that Required for Normal Heart Valve Development and Cardiac Function.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Nr: 1 from the 2004 ASHG Annual Meeting Mutations in A
    Program Nr: 1 from the 2004 ASHG Annual Meeting Mutations in a novel member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. L.E.L.M. Vissers1, C.M.A. van Ravenswaaij1, R. Admiraal2, J.A. Hurst3, B.B.A. de Vries1, I.M. Janssen1, W.A. van der Vliet1, E.H.L.P.G. Huys1, P.J. de Jong4, B.C.J. Hamel1, E.F.P.M. Schoenmakers1, H.G. Brunner1, A. Geurts van Kessel1, J.A. Veltman1. 1) Dept Human Genetics, UMC Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 2) Dept Otorhinolaryngology, UMC Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 3) Dept Clinical Genetics, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; 4) Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, BACPAC Resources, Oakland, CA. CHARGE association denotes the non-random occurrence of ocular coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retarded growth and development, genital hypoplasia, ear anomalies and deafness (OMIM #214800). Almost all patients with CHARGE association are sporadic and its cause was unknown. We and others hypothesized that CHARGE association is due to a genomic microdeletion or to a mutation in a gene affecting early embryonic development. In this study array- based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) was used to screen patients with CHARGE association for submicroscopic DNA copy number alterations. De novo overlapping microdeletions in 8q12 were identified in two patients on a genome-wide 1 Mb resolution BAC array. A 2.3 Mb region of deletion overlap was defined using a tiling resolution chromosome 8 microarray. Sequence analysis of genes residing within this critical region revealed mutations in the CHD7 gene in 10 of the 17 CHARGE patients without microdeletions, including 7 heterozygous stop-codon mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Differential Alternative Splicing in Blood of Young Boys With
    Stamova et al. Molecular Autism 2013, 4:30 http://www.molecularautism.com/content/4/1/30 RESEARCH Open Access Evidence for differential alternative splicing in blood of young boys with autism spectrum disorders Boryana S Stamova1,2,5*, Yingfang Tian1,2,4, Christine W Nordahl1,3, Mark D Shen1,3, Sally Rogers1,3, David G Amaral1,3 and Frank R Sharp1,2 Abstract Background: Since RNA expression differences have been reported in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) for blood and brain, and differential alternative splicing (DAS) has been reported in ASD brains, we determined if there was DAS in blood mRNA of ASD subjects compared to typically developing (TD) controls, as well as in ASD subgroups related to cerebral volume. Methods: RNA from blood was processed on whole genome exon arrays for 2-4–year-old ASD and TD boys. An ANCOVA with age and batch as covariates was used to predict DAS for ALL ASD (n=30), ASD with normal total cerebral volumes (NTCV), and ASD with large total cerebral volumes (LTCV) compared to TD controls (n=20). Results: A total of 53 genes were predicted to have DAS for ALL ASD versus TD, 169 genes for ASD_NTCV versus TD, 1 gene for ASD_LTCV versus TD, and 27 genes for ASD_LTCV versus ASD_NTCV. These differences were significant at P <0.05 after false discovery rate corrections for multiple comparisons (FDR <5% false positives). A number of the genes predicted to have DAS in ASD are known to regulate DAS (SFPQ, SRPK1, SRSF11, SRSF2IP, FUS, LSM14A). In addition, a number of genes with predicted DAS are involved in pathways implicated in previous ASD studies, such as ROS monocyte/macrophage, Natural Killer Cell, mTOR, and NGF signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-CSTF1 (C-Terminal) (C2372)
    Anti-CSTF1 (C-terminal) produced in rabbit, affinity isolated antibody Product Number C2372 Product Description Reagent Anti-CSTF1 (C-terminal) is produced in rabbit using as Supplied as a solution in 0.01 M phosphate buffered the immunogen a synthetic peptide corresponding to a saline, pH 7.4, containing 15 mM sodium azide as a sequence at the C-terminal of human CSTF1 (GeneID: preservative. 1477) conjugated to KLH. The corresponding sequence is identical in mouse and rat. The antibody is affinity- Antibody concentration: 1.0 mg/mL purified using the immunizing peptide immobilized on agarose. Precautions and Disclaimer For R&D use only. Not for drug, household, or other Anti-CSTF1 (C-terminal) specifically recognizes human uses. Please consult the Safety Data Sheet for CSTF1 (also known as Cleavage stimulation factor, information regarding hazards and safe handling 3 pre-RNA, subunit 1, 50 kDa, CSF-50 subunit). The practices. antibody may be used in several immunochemical techniques including immunoblotting (48 kDa) and Storage/Stability immunoprecipitation. Detection of the CSTF1 band by Store at –20 C. For continuous use, the product may immunoblotting is specifically inhibited with the be stored at 2–8 C for up to one month. For extended immunizing peptide. storage, freeze in working aliquots at –20 C. Repeated freezing and thawing, or storage in “frost-free” freezers, mRNA precursors are processed 3-ends in a two-step is not recommended. If slight turbidity occurs upon reaction; endonucleolytic cleavage at the poly(A) site prolonged storage, clarify the solution by centrifugation followed by the addition of adenylate residues to form a before use.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA-Binding Proteins in Human Oogenesis: Balancing Differentiation and Self-Renewal in the Female Fetal Germline
    Stem Cell Research 21 (2017) 193–201 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Stem Cell Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scr RNA-binding proteins in human oogenesis: Balancing differentiation and self-renewal in the female fetal germline Roseanne Rosario a, Andrew J. Childs b, Richard A. Anderson a,⁎ a MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK b Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, UK article info abstract Article history: Primordial germ cells undergo three significant processes on their path to becoming primary oocytes: the initia- Received 7 October 2016 tion of meiosis, the formation and breakdown of germ cell nests, and the assembly of single oocytes into primor- Received in revised form 29 March 2017 dial follicles. However at the onset of meiosis, the germ cell becomes transcriptionally silenced. Consequently Accepted 13 April 2017 translational control of pre-stored mRNAs plays a central role in coordinating gene expression throughout the re- Available online 18 April 2017 mainder of oogenesis; RNA binding proteins are key to this regulation. In this review we examine the role of ex- Keywords: emplars of such proteins, namely LIN28, DAZL, BOLL and FMRP, and highlight how their roles during germ cell Germ cell differentiation development are critical to oogenesis and the establishment of the primordial follicle pool. RNA binding proteins © 2017 The Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Genes and Their Role in Autism Spectrum Disorder
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Essential Genes And Their Role In Autism Spectrum Disorder Xiao Ji University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Ji, Xiao, "Essential Genes And Their Role In Autism Spectrum Disorder" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2369. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2369 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2369 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Essential Genes And Their Role In Autism Spectrum Disorder Abstract Essential genes (EGs) play central roles in fundamental cellular processes and are required for the survival of an organism. EGs are enriched for human disease genes and are under strong purifying selection. This intolerance to deleterious mutations, commonly observed haploinsufficiency and the importance of EGs in pre- and postnatal development suggests a possible cumulative effect of deleterious variants in EGs on complex neurodevelopmental disorders. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous, highly heritable neurodevelopmental syndrome characterized by impaired social interaction, communication and repetitive behavior. More and more genetic evidence points to a polygenic model of ASD and it is estimated that hundreds of genes contribute to ASD. The central question addressed in this dissertation is whether genes with a strong effect on survival and fitness (i.e. EGs) play a specific oler in ASD risk. I compiled a comprehensive catalog of 3,915 mammalian EGs by combining human orthologs of lethal genes in knockout mice and genes responsible for cell-based essentiality.
    [Show full text]
  • A Role for Dazl in Commitment to Gametogenic Fate in Embryonic Germ Cells of C57BL/6 Mice
    A Role for Dazl in Commitment to Gametogenic Fate in Embryonic Germ Cells of C57BL/6 Mice by Yanfeng Lin (Yen-Hong Lim) B.S. Biochemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1998 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPT 2005 C 2005 Yanfeng Lin. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author __ _ __ Department of Biology August, 2005 V /-' ~J-2 Certified by David C. Page Professor of Biology Howard Hughes Medical Institute Thesis Supervisor Accepted b) Stephen P. Bell Co-chair, Biology Graduate Student Committee 'MACHUS ETT S NS1 I OF TECHNOLOGY ARCHIVES' OCT 0 2005 . ,. -~ I LIBRARIES .i. __ A Role for Dazl in Commitment to Gametogenic Fate in Embryonic Germ Cells of C57BL/6 Mice by Yanfeng Lin (Yen-Hong Lim) Submitted to the Department of Biology on June, 2005 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Abstract Germ cells can be defined as the cells that undergo the terminal differentiating process of meiosis. In mice, as XX germ cells enter meiosis around Embryonic days 13.5-14.5 (E13.5-E14.5), they form meiotic figures and down-regulate pluripotency markers. XY germ cells enter proliferation arrest between E13.5 and E16.5, which is accompanied by a distinct morphological change as well.
    [Show full text]