DOCSLIB.ORG

Investitionen Der Energiekonzerne in Erneuerbare Energien

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investitionen Der Energiekonzerne in Erneuerbare Energien von E.ON,von RWE, Vattenfall und EnBW Kapazitäten, Stromerzeugung und Investitionen Stand 2009, Planungen und Ziele 2020 – Energien Erneuerbare in Energiekonzerne großen der vierInvestitionen www . greenpeace . de Autoren (alle IÖW): Dr. Bernd Hirschl (Projektleitung), Anna Neumann Thomas Vogelpohl Unter Mitwirkung von (alle IÖW): Fin Chirvi Lena Pieper Oliver Larsen Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW) Potsdamer Straße 105 D-10785 Berlin Tel. +49 – 30 – 884 594-0 Fax +49 – 30 – 882 54 39 E-mail: [email protected] www.ioew.de Im Auftrag von: Greenpeace e.V. Große Elbstraße 39 22767 Hamburg Ansprechpartner: Andree Böhling Impressum Herausgeber Greenpeace e.V. Große Elbstr. 39, 22767 Hamburg, Tel. 040/306 18-0, Fax 040/306 18-100, [email protected], www.greenpeace.de Politische Vertretung Berlin Marienstr. 19 – 20, 10117 Berlin, Tel. 030/30 88 99-0 V.i.S.d.P.: Andree Böhling Gestaltung Zimmermann und Spiegel Titelfoto Paul Langrock/Greenpeace Druck epd, Virchowstraße 12, 22767 Hamburg Auflage 30 Exemplare Zur Deckung unserer Herstellungskosten bitten wir um eine Spende : GLS Gemeinschaftsbank, BLZ 430 609 67, KTO 33400 Gedruckt auf 100 % Recyclingpapier Stand 3 / 2011 INVESTITIONEN DER VIER GROßEN ENERGIEKONZERNE IN ERNEUERBARE ENERGIEN | III Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Hintergrund und Motivation der Studie ...............................................................................................1 1.2 Zentrale Ziele und Fragen...................................................................................................................2 1.3 Methode, Datenqualität, Begriffe ........................................................................................................3 1.4 Ausbaugrad und politische Ausbauziele als Vergleichsmaßstab .......................................................6 2 Stand 2009, mittelfristige Planungen und Langfristziele der vier großen Energiekonzerne................................................................................................... 9 2.1 E.ON....................................................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Allgemeine Konzerndaten und -struktur ..............................................................................9 2.1.2 Datengrundlagen und -qualität ..........................................................................................11 2.1.3 Situation 2009....................................................................................................................12 2.1.3.1 Stromerzeugung auf der Basis nicht erneuerbarer Brennstoffe sowie Speicher ..............12 2.1.3.2 Stromerzeugung durch erneuerbare Energien..................................................................14 2.1.3.3 Übersicht Kraftwerkskapazitäten und Stromerzeugung konzernweit und in Deutschland 2007 und 2009..............................................................................................17 2.1.3.4 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten in 2010.................................................................................20 2.1.3.5 Investitionen und F&E-Aktivitäten......................................................................................20 2.1.4 Mittelfristige Investitionsplanungen für erneuerbare Energien ..........................................22 2.1.4.1 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten..............................................................................................22 2.1.4.2 Geplante Investitionen.......................................................................................................27 2.1.5 Langfristziele und Zeithorizont 2020..................................................................................28 2.1.5.1 Allgemeine und qualitative konzerneigene Ziele ...............................................................28 2.1.5.2 Quantitative Ziele und berechnete Stromerzeugungspotenziale ......................................31 2.2 RWE..................................................................................................................................................34 2.2.1 Allgemeine Konzerndaten und -struktur ............................................................................34 2.2.2 Datengrundlage und -qualität ............................................................................................38 2.2.3 Situation in 2009................................................................................................................40 2.2.3.1 Stromerzeugung auf der Basis nicht erneuerbarer Brennstoffe sowie Speicher ..............40 2.2.3.2 Stromerzeugung durch erneuerbare Energien..................................................................43 2.2.3.3 Übersicht Kraftwerkskapazitäten und Stromerzeugung konzernweit und in Deutschland 2007 und 2009..............................................................................................46 2.2.3.4 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten in 2010.................................................................................52 2.2.3.5 Investitionen und F&E-Aktivitäten......................................................................................52 2.2.4 Mittelfristige Investitionsplanungen für erneuerbare Energien ..........................................56 2.2.4.1 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten..............................................................................................56 2.2.4.2 Geplante Investitionen.......................................................................................................61 2.2.5 Langfristziele und Zeithorizont 2020..................................................................................63 2.2.5.1 Zielvorstellungen des Konzerns für 2025 ..........................................................................63 2.2.5.2 Konkretere längerfristige Planungen im Bereich erneuerbare Energien...........................65 2.2.5.3 Berechnung von Zielwerten für 2020.................................................................................67 IV | HIRSCHL, NEUMANN, VOGELPOHL 2.3 EnBW ............................................................................................................................................... 69 2.3.1 Allgemeine Konzerndaten und -struktur ........................................................................... 69 2.3.2 Datengrundlage und -qualität............................................................................................ 72 2.3.3 Situation in 2009 ...............................................................................................................73 2.3.3.1 Stromerzeugung auf der Basis nicht erneuerbarer Brennstoffe sowie Speicher.............. 73 2.3.3.2 Stromerzeugung durch erneuerbare Energien ................................................................. 76 2.3.3.3 Übersicht Kraftwerkskapazitäten und Stromerzeugung konzernweit und in Deutschland 2007 und 2009............................................................................................. 78 2.3.3.4 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten in 2010 ................................................................................ 79 2.3.3.5 Investitionen und F&E-Aktivitäten..................................................................................... 80 2.3.4 Mittelfristige Investitionsplanungen für erneuerbare Energien ......................................... 82 2.3.4.1 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten............................................................................................. 83 2.3.4.2 Geplante Investitionen ...................................................................................................... 84 2.3.5 Langfristziele und Zeithorizont 2020................................................................................. 87 2.3.5.1 Konkretere längerfristige Planungen im Bereich erneuerbare Energien .......................... 88 2.3.5.2 Zielsetzungen für 2020: Das „Szenario 20/20“ ................................................................. 89 2.4 Vattenfall........................................................................................................................................... 92 2.4.1 Allgemeine Konzerndaten und -struktur ........................................................................... 93 2.4.2 Datengrundlage und -qualität............................................................................................ 95 2.4.3 Situation in 2009 ...............................................................................................................96 2.4.3.1 Stromerzeugung auf der Basis nicht erneuerbarer Brennstoffe sowie Speicher.............. 96 2.4.3.2 Stromerzeugung durch erneuerbare Energien ................................................................. 99 2.4.3.3 Übersicht Kraftwerkskapazitäten und Stromerzeugung konzernweit und in Deutschland 2007 und 2009........................................................................................... 101 2.4.3.4 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten in 2010 .............................................................................. 103 2.4.3.5 Investitionen und F&E-Aktivitäten................................................................................... 104 2.4.4 Mittelfristige Investitionsplanungen für erneuerbare Energien ....................................... 107 2.4.4.1 Neue Kraftwerkskapazitäten..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IEA-RETD Rewind Offshore
    Comparative Analysis of International Offshore Wind Energy Development REWIND OFFSHORE March 2017 ABOUT THE IEA RETD TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION PROGRAMME The IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Technology Collaboration Programme (IEA RETD TCP) provides a platform for enhancing international cooperation on policies, measures and market instruments to accelerate the global deployment of renewable energy technologies. IEA RETD TCP aims to empower policy makers and energy market actors to make informed decisions by: (1) providing innovative policy options; (2) disseminating best practices related to policy measures and market instruments to increase deployment of renewable energy, and (3) increasing awareness of the short-, medium- and long-term impacts of renewable energy action and inaction. For further information please visit: http://iea-retd.org or contact [email protected]. Twitter: @IEA_RETD IEA RETD TCP is part of the IEA Energy Technology Network. DISCLAIMER The IEA RETD TCP, formally known as the Technology Collaboration Programme for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment and formerly known as the Implementing Agreement for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment (IEA-RETD), functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA RETD TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member Countries. COPYRIGHT This publication should be cited as: IEA RETD TCP (2017), Comparative Analysis of International Offshore Wind Energy Development (REWind Offshore), IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Technology Collaboration Programme (IEA RETD TCP), Utrecht, 2017. Copyright © IEA RETD TCP 2017 (Stichting Foundation Renewable Energy Technology Deployment) AUTHORS Lead Authors: The Carbon Trust is an independent, expert partner that works with public and private section organizations around the world, helping them to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFSHORE RENEWABLES - Wind, Wave and Tidal Energy Sustainable Decisions Selected DHI Project References - from Planning to Construction
    OFFSHORE RENEWABLES - wind, wave and tidal energy Sustainable decisions Selected DHI project references - from planning to construction SustainableDHI planning, is an international, design and independent construction consulting require informed and research organisation Environmental impact assessment – decisions.advancing DHI offers technological highly specialised development environmental and competence monitoring in the fieldshydrography, of biology, wildlife and modellingwater, technology.environment and health. We have contributed to the development Dredging scheme optimisation of offshore wind farms and marine renewable energy installations Onlineworldwide monitoring for more than 25 years. Operational forecasts – metocean, sediment plumes © Design conditions Photo: Bent Medvind OFFSHORE RENEWABLES WIND, WAVE AND TIDAL ENERGY Selected DHI Project References Project Client Year Q10 Offshore Wind Farm, the Netherlands. Monitoring of ENECO, the Netherlands 2013-2018 seabirds on the Dutch continental shelf. Amrumbank West Offshore Wind Farm, Germany. E.ON Kraftwerke GmbH, 2013-2016 Monitoring of waves and currents during installation of Germany foundations and turbines. Kriegers Flak Offshore Wind Farm, Denmark. Baseline Niras A/S, Denmark on 2013-2014 investigations and environmental impact assessments behalf of Energinet.dk, (EIA) of marine mammals and birds. Denmark Three coastal offshore wind farms in Danish waters, Rambøll, Denmark on behalf 2013-2014 Denmark. Baseline and impacts assessments on birds of Energinet.dk, Denmark and marine mammals involving aerial surveys, telemetry, radar and acoustic investigation. Coastal offshore wind farms in Danish waters, Denmark. Energinet.dk, Denmark 2013-2014 Online measurements of metocean paramaters at four different development sites. MISTRAL and Provence Grand Large Floating Offshore EDF energies nouvelles, 2013 Wind Farms (Mediterranean Sea), France. France Morphological study and definition of reference seabed level at both sites and along cable corridors including landfall.
    [Show full text]
  • RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2011.Pdf
    geschäFtsbericht 2011 finanzKalenDer 2012 /2013 2011 geschäftsbericht eCKDaten 2011 auf einen bliCK. RWE • Hohe Ergebnisbelastung durch beschleunigten Kernenergieausstieg in Deutschland 19. April 2012 Hauptversammlung • Betriebliches Ergebnis: 5,8 Mrd. € • Dividendenvorschlag: 2,00 € je Aktie 20. April 2012 Dividendenzahlung • Erste Maßnahmen zur Stärkung der Finanzkraft umgesetzt • Prognose 2012: Betriebliches Ergebnis trotz Desinvestitionen auf Vorjahreshöhe 10. Mai 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2012 RWE-Konzern 2011 2010 + /− in % 14. August 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2012 Außenabsatz Strom Mrd. kWh 294,6 311,2 − 5,3 Außenabsatz Gas Mrd. kWh 322,2 395,4 − 18,5 14. November 2012 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2012 Außenumsatz Mio. € 51.686 53.320 − 3,1 EBITDA Mio. € 8.460 10.256 − 17,5 5. März 2013 Bericht über das Geschäftsjahr 2012 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 5.814 7.681 − 24,3 Ergebnis vor Steuern Mio. € 3.024 4.978 − 39,3 18. April 2013 Hauptversammlung Nettoergebnis /Ergebnisanteile der Aktionäre der RWE AG Mio. € 1.806 3.308 − 45,4 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis Mio. € 2.479 3.752 − 33,9 19. April 2013 Dividendenzahlung Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 10,9 14,4 - Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 8,5 9,0 - 15. Mai 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2013 Wertbeitrag Mio. € 1.286 2.876 − 55,3 Betriebliches Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 53.279 53.386 − 0,2 14. August 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2013 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.510 5.500 0,2 Investitionen Mio. € 7.072 6.643 6,5 14. November 2013 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2013 In Sachanlagen und immaterielle Vermögenswerte Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements of RWE AG 2012
    2012Financial Statements of RWE AG FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RWE AG The financial statements and review of operations of RWE AG for the 2012 fiscal year are submitted to Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Cologne, Germany, the operator of the electronic Bundesanzeiger (Federal Gazette), and published in the electronic Bundesanzeiger. The review of operations of RWE AG has been combined with the review of operations of the RWE Group and is published in our annual report on pages 31 to 101 and pages 111 to 117. Balance Sheet 2 Income Statement 3 Notes 3 Dividend Proposal 20 Responsibility Statement 21 List of Shareholdings (Part of the Notes) 22 Boards (Part of the Notes) 47 Auditor’s Report 51 Financial Calendar 52 Imprint 53 2 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet at 31 December 2012 Assets (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Non-current assets (1) Financial assets 42,440 39,246 Current assets Accounts receivable and other assets (2) Accounts receivable from affiliated companies 9,039 7,719 Accounts receivable from investments 1 Other assets 121 141 Marketable securities (3) 351 2,357 Cash and cash equivalents (4) 1,404 697 10,916 10,914 Prepaid expenses (5) 465 73 Deferred tax assets (6) 2,221 2,761 56,042 52,994 Equity and liabilities (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Equity (7) Subscribed capital Common shares 1,474 1,474 Preferred shares 100 100 1,574 1,574 Less nominal value of treasury shares − 1 Capital issued 1,574 1,573 Capital reserve 2,385 2,385 Retained earnings Other retained earnings 4,870 4,737 Distributable profit
    [Show full text]
  • Final Statements 2012 RWE Innogy Gmbh
    Management Report of RWE Innogy GmbH for the Period Ended 31 December 2012 Review of Operations 1. Business and economic environment 1.1. Object of the company and positioning within the RWE Group's structure RWE Innogy GmbH ("RWE Innogy" or "Company") is a subsidiary wholly owned by RWE Aktiengesellschaft (RWE AG) which pools the expertise of the RWE Group's power plants in the field of renewables. To this end, the Company holds approximately 60 investments in Germany, the rest of Europe and the USA, in particular including RWE Innogy Windpower Hannover GmbH (Germany), RWE Innogy (UK) Ltd. (UK), RWE Renewables Polska Sp. z o.o. (Poland), RWE Innogy Italia S.p.A. (Italy), Georgia Biomass Holding LLC (USA) and RWE Innogy AERSA S.A.U. (Spain), which operate as management companies in their respective countries. In order to achieve the prescribed goal of increasing the share of the RWE Group's electricity generation capacity accounted for by renewables, RWE Innogy and its joint ventures plan, build and operate plants which produce electricity primarily from renewables in Germany and the rest of Europe. One of the focal points of these activities are onshore and offshore wind farm projects. However, the Company is also active in the fields of hydroelectric power and biomass. Furthermore, it provides assistance in developing forward-looking technologies. For instance, RWE Innogy plans and operates biogas facilities as well as solar power stations either directly or via its joint ventures while providing support to innovative enterprises in their startup and growth phases via a venture capital firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government
    Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government December 2018 Acknowledgments The Carbon Trust wrote this report based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone that has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of this report. Special thanks goes to: Black & Veatch Crown Estate Scotland Hartley Anderson Innogy Renewables MHI-Vestas Offshore Wind Milford Haven Port Authority National Grid Natural Resources Wales Ørsted Wind Power Port of Mostyn Prysmian PowerLink The Crown Estate Welsh Government Cover page image credits: Innogy Renewables (Gwynt-y-Môr Offshore Wind Farm). | 1 The Carbon Trust is an independent, expert partner that works with public and private section organizations around the world, helping them to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. We advise corporates and governments on carbon emissions reduction, improving resource efficiency, and technology innovation. We have world-leading experience in the development of low carbon energy markets, including offshore wind. The Carbon Trust has been at the forefront of the offshore wind industry globally for the past decade, working closely with governments, developers, suppliers, and innovators to reduce the cost of offshore wind energy through informing policy, supporting business decision-making, and commercialising innovative technology. Authors: Rhodri James Manager [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Swansea Bay City Region : a Renewable Energy Future Energy System Vision for 2035
    Pen-y-Cymoedd wind farm photo credit Vattenfall Swansea Bay City Region : A Renewable Energy Future Energy system vision for 2035 April 2018 Report and analysis produced by Regen for the Institute of Welsh Affairs The IWA Re-energising Wales project is kindly supported by the Hodge Foundation, the Friends Provident Charitable Foundation and the Polden- Puckham Charitable Foundation. About the Institute of Welsh Affairs (IWA) The IWA is Wales’ leading independent think tank, working to make Wales better. Our role is to act as a catalyst to generate intelligent debate about Wales’ future. We are an independent charity with a broad membership base across the country. We bring people together so that ideas can collide and solutions can be forged. The Re-energising Wales project, which is being led by the IWA, is a three year programme of work that will provide evidence to supporting the project’s goals of showing how Wales could meet its future energy demands from renewable sources by 2035. This evidence will be used to support policy makers in Wales to achieve an overall objective to reduce energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 80% by 2035 based on 1990 emission figures . About Regen Regen is an independent not-for-profit that uses our expertise to work with industry, communities and the public sector to revolutionise the way we generate, supply and use energy. Regen passionately believes that sustainable energy has a vital role at the heart of a successful economy and thriving local communities. We are ambitious on the scale of our impact and aim to be the leading national experts in how to enable radical change in the energy system at a regional and local level.
    [Show full text]
  • OSPAR Database on Offshore Wind-Farms, 2014 Update
    OSPAR database on offshore wind-farms 2014 UPDATE (revised in 2015) Biodiversity Series 2015 OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la opened for signature at the Ministerial signature à la réunion ministérielle des Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention The Convention entered into force on 25 est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. March 1998. The Contracting Parties are Les Parties contractantes sont l'Allemagne, Belgium, Denmark, the European Union, la Belgique, le Danemark, l’Espagne, la Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne Kingdom. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède, la Suisse et l’Union européenne. 2 of 17 OSPAR Commission, 2015 OSPAR Database on Offshore Wind-farms – 2014 Update (revised in 2015) The use of any renewable energy source makes a significant contribution towards climate protection and towards placing our energy supply on a sustainable ecological footing, thereby helping to conserve the natural balance. Nevertheless, the utilisation of renewable sources of energy can also have an adverse impact on the environment and our natural resources. Since 2001, OSPAR and its Biodiversity Committee (BDC) have been noting that the offshore wind energy sector has been rapidly expanding in the OSPAR maritime area.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Involvement in Electricity and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Tarification
    http://think.eui.eu Topic 6 EU Involvement in Electricity and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Tarification Final Report January 2012 Project Leader: Christian von Hirschhausen Research Team Leader: Sophia Ruester Research Team: Claudio Marcantonini Xian He Jonas Egerer Jean-Michel Glachant Project Advisers: Dörte Fouquet Nils-Henrik von der Fehr THINK is financially supported by the EU’s 7th framework programme This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Source should be acknowledged. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the authors, the title, the year and the publisher. ISBN: 978-92-9084-075-6 doi:10.2870/35561 © 2012, European University Institute © 2012, Sophia Ruester, Christian von Hirschhausen, Claudio Marcantonini, Xian He, Jonas Egerer and Jean-Michel Glachant EU Involvement in Electricity and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Tarification Contents Acknowledgements i Executive Summary iii 1. Introduction 1 2. Trans-regional coordination and the potential role of the EU: The case of transmission infrastructures 4 2.1 Economic rationale for EU involvement and harmonization 4 2.1.1 Is any trans-national involvement justified on the grounds of subsidiarity? 4 2.1.2 Is there any economic rationale for public involvement beyond the Member State level? 5 2.1.3 Decentral coordination and EU instruments 6 2.2 Choosing among different forms of EU involvement 7 3. Regulation of TSO revenues 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 Current regulatory practice 9 3.2.1 General price control mechanisms and their implementation 10 3.2.2 Instruments to promote investments 12 3.3 Current EU involvement and harmonization 13 3.4 Recommendations regarding the future role of the EU 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Name First Name Last Name Job Title Country
    Company Name First Name Last Name Job Title Country 1StopWind Ltd Arran Bell Operations Manager United Kingdom 1StopWind Ltd. Alan Mckerns United Kingdom 1StopWind Ltd. Bernadette McAulay Finance Manager United Kingdom 1StopWind Ltd. Joel Telling General Manager United Kingdom 23 Degrees Renewables Ltd Ed Woodrow Business Development United Kingdom 24SEA bvba Gert De Sitter Owner Belgium 3S Europe GmbH Matthias Lamp Vice President of Sales & Marketing Germany 3sun Denmark ApS Christian Christensen Operations Director Denmark 3sun Group Limited Jody Potter United Kingdom 3sun Group Limited Graham Hacon VP Business Development, Offshore Wind United Kingdom 3sun Group Limited Sherri Smith Company Secretary United Kingdom 3W Industri Service Simon Øland Project manager - sales Denmark 3W Industri Service Kenneth Pedersen IWI-S Denmark 4C Offshore Lauren Anderson United Kingdom 4C Offshore Richard Aukland Director United Kingdom 4C Offshore Rosie Haworth Market Researcher United Kingdom 4C Offshore Vincenzo Poidomani Principal Geotechnical Engineer United Kingdom 8.2 Bruno ALLAIN CEO France 8.2 Monitoring GmbH Bernd Höring Managing director Germany 920338402 Ellinor Meling Ceo Norway A&P Group Emma Harrick United Kingdom A.P. Møller Holding Simon Ibsen Investor Denmark A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd. Jens Kirk Denmark A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd. Michael Brunø-Sørensen Senior Bunker Trader Denmark A1wind Aps Martin Jensen Director / A1wind Aps Denmark AAF Ltd Steven Brett Europe MFAS Aftermarket Sales Manager United Kingdom AAG Allan Tarp Sales Manager Denmark
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of RWE AG 2014
    RWE ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUAL REPORTANNUAL 2014 2014 KEY FIGURES AT A GLANCE • Operating result: €4.0 billion • Net income: €1.7 billion • Recurrent net income: €1.3 billion • Dividend proposal: €1 per share • Cash flows from operating activities: €5.6 billion RWE Group1 2014 2013 + /− % Electricity production billion kWh 208.3 218.2 − 4.5 External electricity sales volume billion kWh 258.3 270.9 − 4.7 External gas sales volume billion kWh 281.3 320.7 − 12.3 External revenue € million 48,468 52,425 − 7.5 EBITDA € million 7,131 7,904 − 9.8 Operating result € million 4,017 5,369 − 25.2 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 2,246 − 2,016 – Net income/RWE AG shareholders' share in income € million 1,704 − 2,757 – Recurrent net income € million 1,282 2,314 − 44.6 Return on capital employed (ROCE) % 8.4 10.6 – Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) before tax % 9.0 9.0 – Value added € million − 277 811 – Capital employed € million 47,711 50,646 − 5.8 Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations € million 5,556 4,803 15.7 Capital expenditure € million 3,440 3,978 − 13.5 Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets € million 3,245 3,848 − 15.7 Financial assets € million 195 130 50.0 Free cash flow € million 2,311 960 140.7 Number of shares outstanding (average) thousands 614,745 614,745 – Earnings per share € 2.77 − 4.49 – Recurrent net income per share € 2.09 3.76 − 44.4 Dividend per share € 1.002 1.00 – 31 Dec 2014 31 Dec 2013 Net debt of the RWE Group € million 31,010 30,727 0.9 Workforce3 59,784 64,896 − 7.9 1 See notes on reporting on page 41.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the First Quarter of 2009
    REPORT ON THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2009 • Operating result 5 % up year on year • Earnings targets for the full 2009 fi scal year confi rmed • € 26 billion investment programme ending 2012 will be continued without restriction WorldReginfo - ae6faa3b-02b6-47d8-9833-a4708ff50b52 At a glance RWE Group — Key Figures Jan – Mar Jan – Mar + / - Jan – Dec 2009 2008 in % 2008 Electricity sales billion kWh 77.4 86.2 -10.2 317.1 Gas sales billion kWh 122.2 122.5 -0.2 327.8 External revenue € million 14,516 13,395 8.4 48,950 Germany € million 9,157 8,262 10.8 30,694 Outside Germany € million 5,359 5,133 4.4 18,256 EBITDA € million 3,090 2,951 1 4.7 8,773 1 Operating result € million 2,624 2,499 5.0 6,826 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 2,538 2,213 14.7 4,866 Net income € million 1,745 809 115.7 2,558 Recurrent net income € million 1,507 1,423 5.9 3,367 Earnings per share € 3.28 1.45 126.2 4.75 Recurrent net income per share € 2.83 2.55 11.0 6.25 Cash flows from operating activities € million 533 1,384 -61.5 8,853 Capital expenditure € million 2,054 672 205.7 5,693 Property, plant and equipment € million 853 657 29.8 4,454 Financial assets € million 1,201 15 – 1,239 Free cash flow € million -320 727 -144.0 4,399 Mar 31, 2009 Dec 31, 22222222008 + / - in % Net debt of the RWE Group € million 20,529 18,659 10.0 Workforce 2 66,786 65,908 1.3 1 Figure adjusted; see commentary on page 14.
    [Show full text]