DOCSLIB.ORG

Backcasting Energy Efficiency Futures of the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Backcasting Energy Efficiency Futures of the European Union BACKCASTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY FUTURES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Case studies of Finland and Germany Master’s thesis in Futures Studies Author: Ellinoora Leino-Richert Supervisors: Adjunct professor Jyrki Luukkanen Professor Petri Tapio Adjunct professor Jarmo Vehmas 23.5.2017 Turku Turun kauppakorkeakoulu • Turku School of Economics The originality of this thesis has been checked in accordance with the University of Turku quality assurance system using the Turnitin OriginalityCheck service. Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Importance of energy efficiency ............................................................................ 9 1.2 Objectives and research questions ...................................................................... 11 1.3 Thesis outline ...................................................................................................... 12 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ......................................................................................... 13 2.1 Definitions .......................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Energy policy in the European Union ................................................................... 15 2.3 Global energy visions and scenarios .................................................................... 18 2.4 National energy plans and visions for Finland and Germany ................................ 21 2.4.1 The official plans and scenarios for Finland .......................................................... 23 2.4.2 The official plans and scenarios of Germany ........................................................ 25 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................. 28 3.1 Scenarios ............................................................................................................ 30 3.2 Backcasting vs. forecasting .................................................................................. 32 3.3 Environmental Kuznets Curve ............................................................................. 35 3.4 De-linking / Decoupling ....................................................................................... 38 3.5 Decomposition analysis ...................................................................................... 44 4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 47 4.1 EuroLinda Model ................................................................................................. 47 4.2 Data gathering and scenario framing ................................................................... 51 5 ENERGY SCENARIOS FOR FINLAND ................................................................... 54 5.1 Finland BAU ........................................................................................................ 54 5.2 Structure of economic growth: industry vs. service ............................................. 60 5.3 Energy sources: non-renewable vs. renewable .................................................... 62 6 ENERGY SCENARIOS FOR GERMANY ................................................................. 65 6.1 Germany BAU ..................................................................................................... 65 6.2 Structure of economic growth: industry vs. service ............................................. 70 6.3 Energy sources: non-renewable vs. renewable .................................................... 73 7 RESULTS ........................................................................................................... 76 7.1 Finland ................................................................................................................ 76 7.1.1 Energy efficiency targets vs. Finland BAU ............................................................. 76 7.1.2 Energy efficiency targets vs. other scenarios ....................................................... 79 7.1.3 EKC and de-linking ................................................................................................ 81 7.2 Germany ............................................................................................................. 82 7.2.1 Energy efficiency targets vs. Germany BAU .......................................................... 82 7.2.2 Energy efficiency targets vs. other scenarios ....................................................... 85 7.2.3 EKC and de-linking ................................................................................................ 86 7.3 Intensity scenarios for Finland and Germany ....................................................... 88 8 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................... 90 8.1 Summary of the key results ................................................................................. 90 8.2 Methodological considerations ........................................................................... 96 8.3 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 97 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 99 APPENDIX .............................................................................................................. 115 List of figures Figure 1. Decoupling energy production from GDP in the EU reference scenario. Source: European Commission 2016f. ............................................................................. 18 Figure 2. Finland positioning with Germany in energy efficiency of four sectors. In the graph 1.0 corresponds to the three best countries and 0 to the three countries with the lowest performance in the Odyssee-Mure study. Source: Odyssee-Mure 2017a. .................................................................................................................. 22 Figure 3. The complementary relationship of the research approaches. ........................................ 29 Figure 4. Scenario typology. Source: van Notten et al. 2003, 426; modified by the author. ......... 31 Figure 5. The idea of backcasting. ................................................................................................. 33 Figure 6. An inverted U-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve. .................................................. 36 Figure 7. Degrees of de-linking and re-linking. Source: Vehmas et al. 2003b, 31. ....................... 40 Figure 8. De-linking (and re-linking) and EKC. Source: de Bruyn 2000, 64; modified by the author. ................................................................................................................. 42 Figure 9. Linkages of different calculation modules in the LINDA model. Source: Luukkanen et al. 2015, 871. ....................................................................................................... 49 Figure 10. Total and sectoral GDP growth in Finland BAU in 1990-2030. .................................. 55 Figure 11. Total and sectoral energy consumption in Finland BAU in 1990-2030. ...................... 59 Figure 12. Total power plant capacity in Finland BAU in 1990-2030. ......................................... 59 Figure 13. Total and sectoral GDP growth in Finland (industry vs. service scenario) in 1990- 2030. ................................................................................................................... 61 Figure 14. Total and sectoral energy consumption in Finland (industry vs. service scenario) in 1990-2030. .......................................................................................................... 62 Figure 15. Power plant capacity in Finland (non-renewable vs. renewable scenario) in 1990- 2030. ................................................................................................................... 64 Figure 16. Total and sectoral GDP growth in Germany BAU in 1990-2030. ............................... 66 Figure 17. Total and sectoral energy consumption in Germany BAU in 1990-2030. ................... 69 Figure 18. Total power plant capacity in Germany BAU in 1990-2030. ...................................... 70 Figure 19. Total and sectoral GDP growth in Germany (industry vs. service scenario) in 1990- 2030. ................................................................................................................... 72 Figure 20. Total and sectoral energy consumption in Germany (industry vs. service scenario) in 1990-2030. .......................................................................................................... 73 Figure 21. Power plant capacity in Germany (non-renewable vs. renewable scenario) in 1990- 2030. ................................................................................................................... 75 Figure 22. Development of energy intensity in Finland BAU. ...................................................... 77 Figure 23. Improvement of energy efficiency in Finland BAU. .................................................... 77 Figure 24. Energy consumption targets and Finland BAU scenario. ............................................ 78 Figure 25. Energy savings by 2020 in Finland BAU. .................................................................... 79 Figure 26. Development of energy intensities in all
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finland 242 Finland Finland
    FINLAND 242 FINLAND FINLAND 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Finland (in Finnish Suomi) is a republic in northern Europe, bounded on the north by Norway, on the east by Russia, on the south by the Gulf of Finland and Estonia, on the south-west by the Baltic Sea and on the west by the Gulf of Bothnia and Sweden. Nearly one third of the country lies north of 2 2 the Arctic Circle. The area of Finland, including 31 557 km of inland water, totals 338 000 km . The terrain is generally level, hilly areas are more prominent in the north and mountains are found only in the extreme north-west. The average July temperature in the capital Helsinki on the southern coast is 17 °C. The February average in Helsinki is about -5.7 °C. The corresponding figures at Sodankylä (Lapland) in the northern Finland are 14.1 °C and -13.6 °C. Precipitation (snow and rain) averages about 460 mm in the north and 710 mm in the south. Snow covers the ground for four to five months a year in the south, and about seven months in the north. Finland has a population of 5.16 million (1998) and average population density of 17 per km2 of land. Historical population data is shown in Table 1. The predicted annual population growth rate between the years 1998 and 2010 is 0.21 %. More than two thirds of the population reside in the southern third of the country. In Finland the total primary energy consumption1 per capita was about 60 % higher than the European Union average (according to 1996 statistics) and about 35 % higher than the OECD average.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Renewable Energy Guide 2014.Pdf
    2014 Editors Av. Mesut Çakmak Av. Dr. Çağdaş Evrim Ergün Publication Assistant Zeynep Babür Published by Çakmak Yayınevi ve Medya Limited Şirketi Piyade Sokak, No. 18 06650 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey Printed by Sözkesen Matbaacılık Tic. Ltd. Şti., Ankara, Turkey August 2014, Ankara ISBN: 978-9944-794-17-6 ISBN (e-book): 978-9944-794-16-9 © Çakmak Yayınevi ve Medya Limited Şirketi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Due to the general nature of its contents, this publication should not be regarded as legal advice. The publisher makes no representation or warranty as to, and assumes no responsibility for, the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. CONTENTS 1- AUSTRIA, Wolf Theiss Rechtsanwãlte GmbH ................................................................................................................................ 3 2- BELARUS, Vlasova Mikhel & Partners ........................................................................................................................................ 10 3- BELGIUM, White & Case ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 4- BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA, Huskić Law Office ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PESTLE ANALYSIS of Barriers to Community Energy Development
    PESTLE ANALYSIS of Barriers to Community Energy Development 1 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS AND INSTITUTIONS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER: Aisling Nic Aoidh Údarás na Gaeltachta Christina Hülsken Renewable Energies Agency Clara Good UiT, the Arctic University of Norway Eamonn Ó Neachtain Údarás na Gaeltachta Erik Elfgren Luleå University of Technology Fionnán Ó hOgáin Údarás na Gaeltachta Johanna Salmi Centria.fi Lasse Jansson Centria.fi Mikael Risberg Luleå University of Technology Orla Nic Suibhne Western Development Commission Pauline Leonard Western Development Commission Pentti Etelamaki Lohtaja Energy Cooperative Robert Fischer Luleå University of Technology Ryotaro Kajimura Renewable Energies Agency Silva Herrmann Jokkmokk municipality Ulrich Müller Renewable Energies Agency Wolfgang Mehl Jokkmokk municipality CONTENTS 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 4 2 What is a PESTLE analysis? ............................................................. 6 3 Finland .............................................................................................7 3.1 PESTLE Analysis ....................................................................... 8 3.2 Summary .................................................................................10 4 Ireland ............................................................................................12 4.1 PESTLE Analysis ......................................................................13 4.2 Summary .................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Metsä Group 2019 1
    We are METSÄ GROUP 2019 1 Year 2019 SALES Northern EUR million 5,473 79% 2018: 5,709 OF THE ENERGY USED IN bioproducts PRODUCTION IS RENEWABLE COMPARABLE OPERATING RESULT to the world EUR million 495 100% 2018: 849 TRACEABLE WOOD Metsä Group produces renewable products from northern forests that provide a substitute for the use of fossil based raw materials. We use the best raw COMPARABLE RETURN material in the world responsibly and wisely. ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED 9.6 85% 2018: 16.8 CERTIFIED WOOD Metsä Group focuses on wood supply and forest Metsä Group is planning a new bioproduct SALES* EUR 5.5 BILLION | PERSONNEL 9,300 services, wood products, pulp, fresh fibre paper- mill to be built in Kemi and a new pine saw- METSÄ GROUP RENEWABLE ENERGY 27.7 TWH board as well as tissue and greaseproof papers. mill in Rauma and, the first phase of modernis- OWNED BY 103,000 FINNISH FOREST-OWNERS All our business areas have good growth and ing the Husum pulp mill in Sweden. The value profitability outlooks. Metsä Group invested of these investments in 2020–2023 would be METSÄ FOREST METSÄ WOOD METSÄ FIBRE METSÄ BOARD** METSÄ TISSUE some EUR 2 billion in the increase and devel- around EUR 2 billion. WOOD SUPPLY WOOD PRODUCTS PULP AND PAPERBOARD TISSUE AND opment of its production in 2015–2018, the AND FOREST SAWN TIMBER GREASEPROOF majority of it in Finland. SERVICES PAPERS Sales Sales Sales Sales EUR 0.4 billion EUR 2.2 billion EUR 1.9 billion Sales EUR 2.0 billion Personnel 1,500 Personnel 1,300 Personnel 2,400 EUR 1.0 billion Personnel 840 Personnel
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Animal & Natural Resource
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL & NATURAL RESOURCE LAW Michigan State University College of Law MAY 2019 VOLUME XV The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law is published annually by law students at Michigan State University College of Law. The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law received generous support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law. Without their generous support, the Journal would not have been able to publish and host its annual symposium. The Journal also is funded by subscription revenues. Subscription requests and article submissions may be sent to: Professor David Favre, Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, Michigan State University College of Law, 368 Law College Building, East Lansing MI 48824, or by email to msujanrl@ gmail.com. Current yearly subscription rates are $27.00 in the U.S. and current yearly Internet subscription rates are $27.00. Subscriptions are renewed automatically unless a request for discontinuance is received. Back issues may be obtained from: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14209. The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law welcomes the submission of articles, book reviews, and notes & comments. Each manuscript must be double spaced, in 12 point, Times New Roman; footnotes must be single spaced, 10 point, Times New Roman. Submissions should be sent to [email protected] using Microsoft Word or PDF format. Submissions should conform closely to the 19th edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. All articles contain a 2019 author copyright unless otherwise noted at beginning of article. Copyright © 2019 by the Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, Michigan State University College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report: Finland
    These reports have been prepared by an external contractor and do not necessarily represent the Commission’s view. They are based on the contractor's own research on information publicly available as of November 2013. Assessment of climate change policies in the context of the European Semester Country Report: Finland Ecologic Institute Authors team: Lucy O Smith, Eike Karola Velten, Lena Donat, Matthias Duwe eclareon Authors team: Robert Brückmann, Roger Pilvik Client: DG Climate Action Service Contract: 071201/2012/635684/SER/CLIMA.A.3 Ecologic Institute eclareon Ecologic Institute, Berlin: eclareon GmbH Pfalzburger Strasse 43/44 Giesebrechtstraße 20 10717 Berlin 10629 Berlin Germany Germany www.ecologic.eu www.eclareon.eu Contact: Contact: Eike Karola Velten Robert Brückmann Fellow, Climate and Energy Head of the Policy Department Tel. +49 (30) 86880-165 Tel. +49 (30) 88 66 74 000 Fax +49 (30) 86880-100 Fax +49 (30) 88 66 74 010 eike.velten(at)ecologic.eu rb(at)eclareon.com This country report has been produced as a joint output by Ecologic Institute and eclareon to support the Directorate General for Climate Action (DG CLIMA) at the European Commission in its work on the European Semester (Service Contract: 071201/2012/635684/SER/CLIMA.A.3). The report provides an overview of current emission trends and progress towards targets as well as policy developments that took place over the period from February 2013 to November 2013. Please feel free to provide any comments or suggestions to the authors through the contacts listed above. © Ecologic Institute – eclareon –January 2014 Country Report: Finland Short summary Background: Finland’s cold climate, long distances, and energy intensive industries (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland's Integrated Energy and Climate Plan Contains Finland's National Targets and the Related Policy Measures to Achieve the EU's 2030 Energy and Climate Targets
    Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate Plan Finland’s Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate Plan Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate Plan contains Finland’s national targets and the related policy measures to achieve the EU’s 2030 energy and climate targets. The Energy and Climate Plan addresses all fi ve dimensions of the EU Energy Union: decarbonisation, energy e - ciency, energy security, internal energy markets and research, innovation and competitiveness. Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate Plan outlines the impact of existing policy measures on the projected evolution of greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy and energy e ciency up to 2040. In addition, the plan describes the e ects of the planned policy measures on the energy system, greenhouse gas emissions and sinks, economic development, the environment and public health. The plan also assesses the impact of planned and existing policy measures on investment. Publications of the Ministry of Economic Aairs and Employment Energy • 2019:66 Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate Plan Electronic publications Energy 2019:66 ISSN 1797-3562 WAN E S CO IC L D A PEFC-certified B ISBN 978-952-327-478-5 R E O L The wood used to make N this printing paper comes from sustainably managed, monitored Electronic version: julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi forests. Printed matter Printed matter PEFC/02-31-151 www.pefc.fi 1234 5678 Publication sales: vnjulkaisumyynti.fi 4041-0619 Publications of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment 2019:66 Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Efficiency in Finland
    Energy effi ciency in Finland – A COMPETITIVE APPROACH Contents 4 A pioneer in energy saving 6 Industry leads the way in energy effi ciency 8 Municipalities can set an example 9 Costs under control with the management of energy use in buildings 10 Everyone can make a difference 12 Cutting down energy consumption in transport is everyone’s business 13 Communication boosts energy saving 14 Internationally competitive innovations from Finland 2 TOTAL ENERGY Energy consumption in Finland End use of energy in Finland by CONSUMPTION by energy source in 2005 consumption sector in 2005 IN FINLAND Total energy consumption 1,358 peta- joule (PJ) or 377 terawatt hours (TWh) Electricity consumption 84.9 terawatt hours (TWh) Total energy consumption has doubled and electricity consump- tion has quadrupled since 1970. Coal 10% Industry 48% 1 TWh = 1,000,000,000 kWh Oil 27% Space heating 22% The energy consumption of a medium- Peat 5% Transport 17% sized single-family house is about 20,000 Wood fuels 20% Other*) 13% kilowatt hour (kWh) a year. One tera- Hydropower 4% watt hour is enough to provide energy for Nuclear power 18% *) Use of electricity and fuels by households, Natural gas 11% the public and private service sector, agricul- 50,000 single-family houses for one year. ture and forestry, and construction. Net import of electricity 5% Source: Statistics Finland, Other 2% Preliminary Energy Statistics 2005 In energy conservation, every kilowatt hour counts! Cold climate Long distances High standard of living Energy intensive industry 3 Finland is a cold and sparsely populated northern country, where energy is consumed in heating, transport, maintaining a high standard of living, and in the energy intensive industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Metsä Group's Investments
    Metsä Group’s investments Juha Mäntylä COO, Metsäliitto Cooperative Key figures 2018 * Internal sales eliminated **Listed on Nasdaq Helsinki METSÄ GROUP | Sales* EUR 5.7 billion | Personnel 9,300 | Renewable energy 28,4 TWh METSÄLIITTO COOPERATIVE | Group’s parent company | Owned by 103,000 Finnish forest owners METSÄ FOREST METSÄ WOOD METSÄ FIBRE METSÄ BOARD** METSÄ TISSUE Wood supply and Wood products Pulp and Paperboard Tissue and forest services Sawn Timber Greaseproof Papers Sales: Sales: Sales: Sales: Sales: EUR 2.0 billion EUR 0.4 billion EUR 2.5 billion EUR 1.9 billion EUR 1.0 billion Personnel: Personnel: Personnel: Personnel: Personnel: 840 1,500 1,200 2,400 2,800 METSÄ SPRING | Innovation Company 2 16.9.2019 Metsä Group Metsä Groups investments 2015-2019 EUR million • Tissue and cooking paper investments in 800 758 Germany and Slovakia 608 • Folding box board machine in Husum 600 492 • Bioproduct mill in Äänekoski • New LVL-line in Lohja 400 274 Full year • BCTMP-mill improvement in Kaskinen estimate 200 • Plywood production in Äänekoski-Pärnu • New LVL-line in Punkaharju 97 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 1–6/2019 3 1 August 2019 Metsä Group Metsä Group has started pre- engineering related to three investments worth EUR 2 billion in total • New bioproduct mill in Kemi • New pine sawmill in Rauma • First phase in renewing the Husum pulp mill in Sweden 4 New Kemi mill would be the biggest forest industry investment in Europe • EUR 1.5 billion investment • Pulp production capacity 1.5 million tonnes (currently 0.6) • Wood consumption 7.6 million m³/a (3.1) • Self-sufficiency in electricity 250 per cent • Sidestreams utilized 100%.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimisation Perspectives in the Åland Energy Market Due to the Increase of Renewable Energies
    Different Optimisation Perspectives in the Åland Energy Market due to the Increase of Renewable Energies Master Thesis | Julia Marie Leichthammer, B.Sc. | 1635597 | Business Engineering with the technical field of studies Electrical Engineering and Information Technology | Specifications in Finance & Project Management as well as Electrical Power Engineering | Submission date: 1. November 2016 TU Darmstadt | Department of Law and Economics | Institute of Corporate Finance | Prof. Dr. Dirk Schiereck TU Darmstadt | Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology | Institute of Electrical Power Supply with Integration of Renewable Energies | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jutta Hanson | Tim Plößer, M.Sc. ABB Oy | Strömbergintie 1B, 00381 Helsinki, Finland | Discrete Automation and Motion Division | Business Unit Motors and Generators | Teijo Kärnä List of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... III List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... IV Personal Declaration........................................................................................................................... VI List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... VII 1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vaasa, Finland
    20 - 24 VAASA, 2017 MARCH FINLAND PROGRAM VAASA - THE NORDIC ENERGY CAPITAL ENERGYWEEK AIMING FOR GIGAFACTORY CONTACTS & INFO 4 Once again Vaasa has the honour of hosting Finland’s number one event for the energy industry. Vaasa Energy Week brings together some 4,000 experts to exchange thoughts, ponder future trends and make the world a cleaner place to live. We need visions, they give us educational institutions and important player in the global the direction to go forward. other organizations towards energy and environmental SCHEDULE The vision of the City of Vaasa growth and development. issues. That is why we are aiming was to be the Energy Capital of Now Vaasa wants to become for Gigafactory. 6 the Nordic Countries and that a part of visions that are far I wish you a rewarding and Our new vision quickly became the reality. greater, visions that will change enjoyable week in Vaasa! Vaasa has an energy industry the world for the better. Our cluster that is also internationally new vision is called Gigavaasa vision distinguished. More than 140 and we are currently preparing TOMAS HÄYRY MAYOR, CITY OF VAASA companies within the energy a proposal for the next Tesla EVENTS sector represent a turnover of Gigafactory to be built in is called over 4 billion euros. All these Vaasa. Sustainable development companies work together with is our passion and Vaasa is an Energia- & ympäristöseminaari ..................8 Gigavaasa Vaasa Wind Exchange & Solar ......................10 3 ACTIONS ARE NEEDED FOR MEETING Energy Business Forum ..................................17 THE TARGETS OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT Last November, the historical agreement reached in Paris came Energy Regulation ............................................20 into effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland's Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade
    sustainability Article Finland’s Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade Relations or an Energy Security Threat? Jaakko J. Jääskeläinen 1, Sakari Höysniemi 2,* , Sanna Syri 1 and Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, P.O. Box 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland; jaakko.j.jaaskelainen@aalto.fi (J.J.J.); sanna.syri@aalto.fi (S.S.) 2 Aleksanteri Institute, Faculty of Arts, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 24, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; veli-pekka.tynkkynen@helsinki.fi * Correspondence: sakari.hoysniemi@helsinki.fi; Tel.: +358-50-3148944 Received: 31 August 2018; Accepted: 25 September 2018; Published: 27 September 2018 Abstract: Studies on energy security in the context of relations between European Union (EU) and Russia tend to focus on cases, with an open conflict related to supply, such as “hard” energy weapons, or on only one fuel, often natural gas. However, there is a need to understand the long-term impacts that energy relations have politically, economically and physically, and their linkages between resilience, sustainability and security. We analyse the Finnish-Russian energy relations as a case study, as they are characterised by a non-conflictual relationship. To assess this complex relationship, we apply the interdependence framework to analyse both the energy systems and energy strategies of Finland and Russia, and the energy security issues related to the notable import dependence on one supplier. Moreover, we analyse the plausible development of the energy trade between the countries in three different energy policy scenarios until 2040. The findings of the article shed light on how the trends in energy markets, climate change mitigation and broader societal and political trends could influence Russia’s energy trade relations with countries, such as Finland.
    [Show full text]