DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology and Resources of Some World Oil-Shale Deposits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology and Resources of Some World Oil-Shale Deposits Geology and Resources of Some World Oil-Shale Deposits Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5294 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Left: New Paraho Co. experimental oil shale retort in the Piceance Creek Basin a few miles west of Rifle, Colorado. Top right: Photo of large specimen of Green River oil shale interbedded with gray layers of volcanic tuff from the Mahogany zone in the Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado. This specimen is on display at the museum of the Geological Survey of Japan. Bottom right: Block diagram of the oil shale resources in the Mahogany zone in about 1,100 square miles in the eastern part of the Uinta Basin, Utah. The vertical scale is in thousands of barrels of in-place shale oil per acre and the horizontal scales are in UTM coordinates. Illustration published as figure 17 in U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 91-0285. Geology and Resources of Some World Oil-Shale Deposits By John R. Dyni Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5294 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 Posted onlline June 2006 Version 1.0 This publication is only available online at: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5294 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Dyni, J.R., 2006, Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5294, 42 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Recoverable Resources................................................................................................................................2 Determining Grade of Oil Shale ...................................................................................................................2 Origin of Organic Matter ...............................................................................................................................3 Thermal Maturity of Organic Matter ..........................................................................................................3 Classification of Oil Shale .............................................................................................................................3 Evaluation of Oil-Shale Resources .............................................................................................................5 Australia ..........................................................................................................................................................5 Torbanite .................................................................................................................................................5 Tasmanite ...............................................................................................................................................5 Toolebuc Oil Shale ................................................................................................................................6 Eastern Queensland .............................................................................................................................6 Brazil ................................................................................................................................................................8 Paraíba Valley ........................................................................................................................................8 Iratí Formation .......................................................................................................................................8 Canada ...........................................................................................................................................................10 New Brunswick Oil Shale ..................................................................................................................10 China ..............................................................................................................................................................13 Fushun ..................................................................................................................................................13 Maoming...............................................................................................................................................15 Estonia ...........................................................................................................................................................15 Dictyonema Shale ...............................................................................................................................17 Israel ..............................................................................................................................................................17 Jordan ............................................................................................................................................................18 Syria ...............................................................................................................................................................21 Morocco ........................................................................................................................................................21 Russia.............................................................................................................................................................21 Sweden ..........................................................................................................................................................21 Thailand .........................................................................................................................................................25 Turkey .............................................................................................................................................................25 United States ................................................................................................................................................25 Green River Formation .......................................................................................................................25 Geology ........................................................................................................................................25 Historical Developments ..........................................................................................................27 Shale-Oil Resources ..................................................................................................................29 Other Mineral Resources .........................................................................................................29 Eastern Devonian–Mississippian Oil Shale ....................................................................................29 Depositional Environment ........................................................................................................29 Resources ...................................................................................................................................31 Summary of World Resources of Shale Oil .............................................................................................33 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................38 iv Figures 1. Classification of oil shales ...........................................................................................................4 2. Deposits of oil shale in Australia ................................................................................................7 3. Deposits of oil shale in Brazil ......................................................................................................8 4. Typical lithologic log and shale-oil yield of the Iratí oil shale, Brazil ...................................9 5. Oil-shale deposits in Canada ....................................................................................................11 6. Oil-shale deposits in the Maritime Provinces, Canada ........................................................13 7. Geologic cross section (A) and stratigraphic section (B) of the Fushun oil-shale deposit, Liaoning Province, China. ...........................................................................................14 8. Location and stratigraphic section of kukersite deposits, northern Estonia and Russia ....................................................................................................................................16
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petrographic and Vitrinite Reflectance Analyses of a Suite of High Volatile Bituminous Coal Samples from the United States and Venezuela
    Petrographic and vitrinite reflectance analyses of a suite of high volatile bituminous coal samples from the United States and Venezuela Open-File Report 2008-1230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk A. Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Hackley, P.C., Kolak, J.J., 2008, Petrographic and vitrinite reflectance analyses of a suite of high volatile bituminous coal samples from the United States and Venezuela: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1230, 36 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1230. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................1 Methods ..............................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Shale and Tar Sands
    Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability Editors David S. Ginley and David Cahen Oil shale and tar sands James W. Bunger 11 JWBA, Inc., Energy Technology and Engineering, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 11.1 Focus 11.2 Synopsis Tar sands and oil shale are “uncon- Oil shale and tar sands occur in dozens of countries around the world. With in-place ventional” oil resources. Unconven- resources totaling at least 4 trillion barrels (bbl), they exceed the world's remaining tional oil resources are characterized petroleum reserves, which are probably less than 2 trillion bbl. As petroleum becomes by their solid, or near-solid, state harder to produce, oil shale and tar sands are finding economic and thermodynamic under reservoir conditions, which parity with petroleum. Thermodynamic parity, e.g., similarity in the energy cost requires new, and sometimes of producing energy, is a key indicator of economic competitiveness. unproven, technology for their Oil is being produced on a large commercial scale by Canada from tar sands, recovery. For tar sands the hydrocar- and to a lesser extent by Venezuela. The USA now imports well over 2 million barrels bon is a highly viscous bitumen; for of oil per day from Canada, the majority of which is produced from tar sands. oil shale, it is a solid hydrocarbon Production of oil from oil shale is occurring in Estonia, China, and Brazil albeit on called “kerogen.” Unconventional smaller scales. Importantly, the USA is the largest holder of oil-shale resources. oil resources are found in greater For that reason alone, and because of the growing need for imports in the USA, quantities than conventional petrol- oil shale will receive greater development attention as petroleum supplies dwindle.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia's Forests
    West Virginia’s Forests Growing West Virginia’s Future Prepared By Randall A. Childs Bureau of Business and Economic Research College of Business and Economics West Virginia University June 2005 This report was funded by a grant from the West Virginia Division of Forestry using funds received from the USDA Forest Service Economic Action Program. Executive Summary West Virginia, dominated by hardwood forests, is the third most heavily forested state in the nation. West Virginia’s forests are increasing in volume and maturing, with 70 percent of timberland in the largest diameter size class. The wood products industry has been an engine of growth during the last 25 years when other major goods-producing industries were declining in the state. West Virginia’s has the resources and is poised for even more growth in the future. The economic impact of the wood products industry in West Virginia exceeds $4 billion dollars annually. While this impact is large, it is not the only impact on the state from West Virginia’s forests. Other forest-based activities generate billions of dollars of additional impacts. These activities include wildlife-associated recreation (hunting, fishing, wildlife watching), forest-related recreation (hiking, biking, sightseeing, etc.), and the gathering and selling of specialty forest products (ginseng, Christmas trees, nurseries, mushrooms, nuts, berries, etc.). West Virginia’s forests also provide millions of dollars of benefits in improved air and water quality along with improved quality of life for West Virginia residents. There is no doubt that West Virginia’s forests are a critical link to West Virginia’s future.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Technical Report
    Technology Technical Report HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ABOUT THIS REPORT This document is one of the seven technical reports com- pleted for the Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan Integrated Assessment conducted by the University of Michigan. During the initial phase of the project, seven faculty-led and student-staffed teams focused on the following topics: Technology, Geology/ Hydrogeology, Environment/Ecology, Human Health, Policy/ Law, Economics, and Public Perceptions. These reports were prepared to provide a solid foundation of information on the topic for decision makers and stakeholders and to help inform the Integrated Assessment, which will focus on the analysis of policy options. The reports were informed by comments from (but do not necessarily reflect the views of) the Integrated Assessment Steering Committee, expert peer reviewers, and numerous public comments. Upon completion of the peer review process, final decisions regarding the content of the reports were deter- mined by the faculty authors in consultation with the peer review editor. These reports should not be characterized or cited as final products of the Integrated Assessment. The reports cover a broad range of topics related to hydraulic fracturing in Michigan. In some cases, the authors determined that a general discussion of oil and gas development is important to provide a framing for a more specific discussion of hydraulic fracturing. The reports address common hydraulic fracturing (HF) as meaning use of hydraulic fracturing methods regardless of well depth, fluid volume, or orientation of the well (whether vertical, directional, or horizontal). HF has been used in thousands of wells throughout Michigan over the past several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump
    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INERTINITE-RICH LUMP COALS. Nandi Malumbazo A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philoso- phy in the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering at the University of the Witwatersrand. Johannesburg, 2011 DECLARATION I, Nandi Malumbazo, declare that the thesis entitled: “CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INER- TINITE-RICH LUMP COALS” is my own work and that all sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and ac- knowledged by means of references. Signature: ……………………………………………………………….. Date:………………………………………………………………………… Page i ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Two Highveld inertinite-rich lump coals were utilized as feed coal samples in order to study their physical, chemical structural and petrographic variations during heat treat- ment in a packed-bed reactor unit combustor. The two feed lump coals were selected as it is claimed that Coal B converts at a slower rate in a commercial coal conversion process when compared to Coal A. The reason for this requires detailed investigation. Chemical structural variations were determined by proximate and coal char CO2 reactiv- ity analysis. Physical structural variations were determined by FTIR, BET adsorption methods, XRD and 13C Solid state NMR analysis. Carbon particle type analysis was con- ducted to determine the petrographic constituents of the reactor generated samples, their maceral associations (microlithotype), and char morphology. This analysis was undertaken with the intention of tracking the carbon conversion and char formation and consumption behaviour of the two coal samples within the reactor. Proximate analysis revealed that Coal A released 10 % more of its volatile matter through the reactor compared to Coal B.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Education Roadmap for Mining Professionals
    Education Roadmap for Mining Professionals December 2002 Mining Industry of the Future Mining Industry of the Future Education Roadmap for Mining Professionals FOREWORD In June 1998, the Chairman of the National Mining Association and the Secretary of Energy entered into a compact to pursue a collaborative technology research partnership, the Mining Industry of the Future. Following the compact signing, the mining industry developed The Future Begins with Mining: A Vision of the Mining Industry of the Future. That document, completed in September 1998, describes a positive and productive vision of the U.S. mining industry in the year 2020. It also establishes long-term goals for the industry. One of those goals is: "Improved Communication and Education: Attract the best and the brightest by making careers in the mining industry attractive and promising. Educate the public about the successes in the mining industry of the 21st century and remind them that everything begins with mining." Using the Vision as guidance, the Mining Industry of the Future is developing roadmaps to guide it in achieving industry’s goals. This document represents the roadmap for education in the U.S. mining industry. It was developed based on the results of an Education Roadmap Workshop sponsored by the National Mining Association in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Industrial Technologies. The Workshop was held February 23, 2002 in Phoenix, Arizona. Participants at the workshop included individuals from universities, the mining industry, government agencies, and research laboratories. They are listed below: Workshop Participants: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Underlying the US Portions of The
    The eight continuous AUs (and associated basins) are as follows: Table 2. Summary of mean values of Great Lakes oil and National Assessment of Oil and Gas Fact Sheet 1. Pennsylvanian Saginaw Coal Bed Gas AU (Michigan Basin), gas resource allocations by lake. 2. [Devonian] Northwestern Ohio Shale AU (Appalachian Basin), [Compiled from table 1, which contains the full range of statistical 3. [Devonian] Marcellus Shale AU (Appalachian Basin), values] Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Underlying the 4. Devonian Antrim Continuous Gas AU (Michigan Basin), 5. Devonian Antrim Continuous Oil AU (Michigan Basin), Total undiscovered resources U.S. Portions of the Great Lakes, 2005 6. [Silurian] Clinton-Medina Transitional AU (Appalachian Basin), Oil Gas Natural gas 7. [Ordovician] Utica Shale Gas AU (Appalachian Basin), and (million (trillion liquids 8. Ordovician Collingwood Shale Gas AU (Michigan Basin). barrels), cubic feet), (million barrels), Of these eight continuous AUs, only the following four AUs were Lake mean mean mean Lake bathymetry (meters) 300 - 400 assessed quantitatively: [Silurian] Clinton-Medina Transitional AU, Devo- he U.S. Geological Survey recently completed Lake Erie 46.10 3.013 40.68 T 200 - 300 nian Antrim Continuous Gas AU, [Devonian] Marcellus Shale AU, and Lake Superior allocations of oil and gas resources underlying the U.S. por- 100 - 200 Allocation [Devonian] Northwestern Ohio Shale AU. The other four continuous AUs Lake Huron 141.02 0.797 42.49 area tions of the Great Lakes. These allocations were developed 0 - 100 lacked sufficient data to assess quantitatively. Lake Michigan 124.59 1.308 37.40 from the oil and gas assessments of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development
    5th Edition Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______________________________________________________________________________ Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development Prepared by INTEK, Inc. For the U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Petroleum Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Fifth Edition: September 2011 Note to Readers Regarding the Revised Edition (September 2011) This report was originally prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy in June 2007. The report and its contents have since been revised and updated to reflect changes and progress that have occurred in the domestic oil shale and tar sands industries since the first release and to include profiles of additional companies engaged in oil shale and tar sands resource and technology development. Each of the companies profiled in the original report has been extended the opportunity to update its profile to reflect progress, current activities and future plans. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by INTEK, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Petroleum Reserves, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (DOE/NPOSR) as a part of the AOC Petroleum Support Services, LLC (AOC- PSS) Contract Number DE-FE0000175 (Task 30). Mr. Khosrow Biglarbigi of INTEK, Inc. served as the Project Manager. AOC-PSS and INTEK, Inc. wish to acknowledge the efforts of representatives of the companies that provided information, drafted revised or reviewed company profiles, or addressed technical issues associated with their companies, technologies, and project efforts. Special recognition is also due to those who directly performed the work on this report. Mr. Peter M. Crawford, Director at INTEK, Inc., served as the principal author of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Minerals Soils to Engineering Technology to Cat Litter
    Clay Minerals Soils to Engineering Technology to Cat Litter USC Mineralogy Geol 215a (Anderson) Clay Minerals Clay minerals likely are the most utilized minerals … not just as the soils that grow plants for foods and garment, but a great range of applications, including oil absorbants, iron casting, animal feeds, pottery, china, pharmaceuticals, drilling fluids, waste water treatment, food preparation, paint, and … yes, cat litter! Bentonite workings, WY Clay Minerals There are three main groups of clay minerals: Kaolinite - also includes dickite and nacrite; formed by the decomposition of orthoclase feldspar (e.g. in granite); kaolin is the principal constituent in china clay. Illite - also includes glauconite (a green clay sand) and are the commonest clay minerals; formed by the decomposition of some micas and feldspars; predominant in marine clays and shales. Smectites or montmorillonites - also includes bentonite and vermiculite; formed by the alteration of mafic igneous rocks rich in Ca and Mg; weak linkage by cations (e.g. Na+, Ca++) results in high swelling/shrinking potential Clay Minerals are Phyllosilicates All have layers of Si tetrahedra SEM view of clay and layers of Al, Fe, Mg octahedra, similar to gibbsite or brucite Clay Minerals The kaolinite clays are 1:1 phyllosilicates The montmorillonite and illite clays are 2:1 phyllosilicates 1:1 and 2:1 Clay Minerals Marine Clays Clays mostly form on land but are often transported to the oceans, covering vast regions. Kaolinite Al2Si2O5(OH)2 Kaolinite clays have long been used in the ceramic industry, especially in fine porcelains, because they can be easily molded, have a fine texture, and are white when fired.
    [Show full text]
  • IM9S »Ocumfht
    IM9S »OCUMfHT Organized by: The Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure In cooperation with: Ben Gurian University or the Negev Geological Survey of Israel Israel National Committee — World Energy Conference Techmon — Israel Institute of Technology Tel Aviv University The Hebrew University of Jerusalem The Israel Electric Corporation Ltd. The Israel Institute of Petroleum and Energy The Ministry of Foreign Affairs The Weizmann Institute of Science Organizing Committee P. Glueckttern - Chairman Chief Scientist, Ministty of Energy and Infrastructure S. Agour Ministry of Foreign Affairs D.Arnon Chairman, Israel National Committee, World Energy Conference G. Esterson Casali Institute for Applied Chemistry, Hefcrow University of Jerusalem E. Greenberg Deputy Director-General, Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure R. Kapfansky Secretary, Israel National Committee, Wond Energy Conference M. Ndken Israel Electric Corporation Y.Porat Israel Electric Corporation A. Shavit Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion-lsrael Institute of Technology Geological Survey of Israel R.Tenne Department of Materials Research, The Weizmann Institute •»• Scenoe RVadai Managing Director, The Israel Institute of Potroieum and Energy D. Wolf Faculty of Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Y.Zahavi F acuity ot Management, Tel Aviv University "* Energy 88 Secretariat c/o International Ltd. PO. Box 29313 65121 Tel Aviv, Israel Tel: (03) 654541, Telex: 33554INTURIL Contents Monday, June 6,1988 Page Plenary Session 9 Overview on Technologies 16 International
    [Show full text]
  • Program and Abstracts
    The Atlantic Geoscience Society (AGS) La Société Géoscientifique de l’Atlantique 45th Colloquium and Annual Meeting Special Sessions: • Special Session: In Memory of Dr. Trevor MacHattie (1974 - 2018) • Paleontology and Sedimentology in Atlantic Canada: In Memory of Dr. Ron Pickerill (1947 – 2018) • Current Research in Carboniferous Geology in the Atlantic Provinces • Minerals, metals, melts, and fluids associated with granitoid rocks: new insights from fundamental studies into the genesis, melt fertility, and ore-forming processes • Earth Science Outreach in the Maritime Provinces • Geohazards: Recent and Historical General Sessions: Current Research in the Atlantic Provinces February 7-9, 2019 Fredericton Inn, Fredericton, New Brunswick PROGRAM WITH ABSTRACTS We gratefully acknowledge sponsorship from the following companies and organizations: Department of Energy and Resource Development Geological Surveys Branch Department of Energy and Mines Department of Energy and Mines Geological Surveys Division Petroleum Resources Division Welcome to the 45th Colloquium and Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Geoscience Society in Fredericton, New Brunswick. This is a familiar place for AGS, having been a host several times over the years. We hope you will find something to interest you and generate discussion with old friends and new. AGS members are clearly pushing the boundaries of geoscience in all its branches! Be sure to take in the science on the posters and the displays from sponsors, and don’t miss the after-banquet jam and open mike on Saturday night. For social media types, please consider sharing updates on Facebook and Twitter (details in the program). We hope you will be able to use the weekend to renew old acquaintances, make new ones, and further the aims of your Atlantic Geoscience Society.
    [Show full text]