DOCSLIB.ORG

Equus Ferus Przewalskii) and Descendants of the Tarpan (Equus Ferus Ferus) (E.G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equus Ferus Przewalskii) and Descendants of the Tarpan (Equus Ferus Ferus) (E.G Chapter 7. Synthesis and Discussion 318 CHAPTER 7. SYNTHESIS AND DISCUSSION 7.1 Introduction In Eurasia, the tahki (Equus ferus przewalskii) and descendants of the tarpan (Equus ferus ferus) (e.g. Konik polski breed) are being bred and re-introduced as ‘umbrella’ conservation species to play the role of ‘ecosystem engineers’ under the World Wide Fund Large Herbivore Initiative (LHI) (van Dierendonck and de Vries 1996; Bokdam et al. 2002; Michel 2008). The term ecosystem engineer is used to describe organisms that modify, create or define habitats by altering the habitat’s physical properties (Jones et al. 1994; Berke 2010). In the context of wetlands, peatlands and abandoned agricultural lands in Europe, the potential for horses to create or engineer richly structured landscapes is an efficient means of conserving and restoring biodiversity in entire ecosystems and providing habitat for declining bird species (Bunzel-Drűke 2001; Vulink 2001; Loucougaray et al. 2004). On continents with a long but discontinuous evolutionary history of horses, such as North America, opinions as to the conservation role of horses and other ungulates is controversial. In an initiative similar to the LHI, a group of conservation biologists proposed to populate western North America with African and Asian megafauna (termed Pleistocene re-wilding), including horses, lions, elephants, cheetahs, and camels, to restore some of the species assemblage lost (including equids) from North America during the Pleistocene extinctions (Donlan 2005; Donlan et al. 2006; Rubenstein et al. 2006; Caro 2007; Donlan 2007). However, in North America feral horses have also been identified as ecosystem engineers (e.g. Ostermann-Kelm et al. 2009), but with adverse effects on the biotic integrity of habitats and posing a threat to endangered or native plant and animal communities (Rogers 1994; Beever and Brussard 2000a, 2004; Beever and Herrick 2006; Ostermann-Kelm et al. 2009). In GFRNP, feral horses are suspected of causing significant environmental damage, and several reports have provided some preliminary evidence to that effect. Reports were limited by the scope of ecological attributes monitored and the spatial and temporal scale at which studies were conducted (Taylor 1995; Andreoni 1998; Jarman et al. 2003; Schott 2003). The environmental impact of horses in temperate and subhumid grasslands, with the exception of studies from Argentina (Zalba and Cozzani 2004; Loydi and Zalba 2009; Alejandro et al. 2010), has not been well documented. Thus, the adverse effects of feral horses as ecosystem engineers reported in the literature was evaluated in this thesis in Chapter 7. Synthesis and Discussion 319 respect to temperate–subtropical grassy woodland–open forest communities in GFRNP, where horse removal in the past has proven highly controversial. The potential for horses to influence the spatial distribution of macropods and supplant eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) from their grazing niche is specific to Australia and had not been addressed prior to this study. The objectives of this chapter are to: 1) summarise the important results of each study chapter 2) provide a synthesis of all chapters in relation to the major questions posed by the literature 3) evaluate the outcomes of this research in the context of general theories pertaining to the effects of ungulate grazing 4) present the implications for management of feral horses in GFRNP arising from this research 5) provide recommendations for future research. 7.2 Summary of important results 7.2.1 Chapter 3: indirect effect of feral horses on small-scale habitat use of macropods This was the first study to monitor macropod dung in conjunction with the manipulated abundance of feral horses, thereby establishing a link between changes in macropod activity (effect) and horse removal (cause). Permanent dung transects were established in a 100 ha area around exclosure sites. At four of six sites, horse dung declined with progressive horse removals. A measure of horse abundance derived from the NPWS feral horse trap and removal program database confirmed resident horses, with stable home range and core use areas, were no longer present at the four sites. In the absence of feral horses, macropod dung increased after 4 months, possibly in less time at one site. The inverse relationship between horse and macropod dung was strongest in grazing habitat types preferred by both species according to the literature. Macropod dung was not present at the one site where feral horse dung and the number of horses trapped did not progressively decline, nor at the site directly adjacent where horse dung did not decline to nominal levels until the final sampling time. The majority (over 90%) of macropod dung was eastern grey kangaroo. Eastern grey kangaroos evidently altered their small-scale habitat use on Paddys Plateau in response to either the presence of feral horses or their dung or as a Chapter 7. Synthesis and Discussion 320 result of horse-induced changes to aspects of habitat quality, such as the removal of biomass. Feral horses may have also displaced macropods at a landscape scale from gorge country catchments. Macropods were absent from the catchment with the highest horse density, Bobs Creek, as essentially no dung was recorded on transects in a 4 × 1-km area centred on exclosures or at each of the ten exclosure sites along Bobs Creek and very little in the landscape-scale survey. Horse counts have historically been lower in Pargo Creek, where macropod dung was greater on spurs than hillslopes. The topography of spurs allows easier movement than hillslopes, and horses possibly deterred macropods from feeding in gorge catchments, restricting their use to travelling along spurs between non-horse catchments. Macropod dung was substantially greater and present on all gradsects in environmentally equivalent locations in catchments with no known population of feral horses since the 1920s. 7.2.2 Chapter 4: impact of feral horses on the groundstorey vegetation of a temperate grassy woodland–open forest plateau The exclosure design had the potential to compare plots grazed by horses (controls), plots grazed by macropods but not horses (horse exclosures), and ungrazed plots (complete exclusion). The removal of 241 horses prior to and over the course of the experiment weakened the ability of the study to detect the effect of horses on some plant variables. However, the removal of horses and results of the exclosure treatments further clarified the relationship between horses and eastern grey kangaroos. In the first year, horse dung in control plots and the number of horses trapped suggested that horses were relatively more abundant than at subsequent sampling times, whereas macropod dung was rare. Both the horse exclosure and complete exclusion treatments resulted in an increase in biomass and cover of sedges, and a reduction in the cover of bare ground. Horses were also associated with reductions in plant cover and concurrent increase in litter cover in addition to cover of bare ground. After the first year, horse dung decreased significantly and continued to decline at all but one site. Macropod dung progressively increased in controls and horse exclosures, coinciding with greater biomass under complete exclusion only. In the absence of horses, eastern grey kangaroos appeared to replace horses as the dominant consumer of herbaceous biomass. Reductions in kangaroo grass (Themeda australis) biomass and reproductive output also corresponded to greater counts of macropod dung in controls and horse exclosures, kangaroo grass being Chapter 7. Synthesis and Discussion 321 highly preferred by eastern grey kangaroos. Evidence was sufficient to conclude that after horses were removed, eastern grey kangaroos became the dominant grazer and interacted with site specific characteristics to regulate the accumulation of groundstorey vegetation biomass and the reproductive output of the competitive tall-tussock kangaroo grass. Exotic species richness declined under complete exclusion, but changes in all other richness measures were not related to grazing treatments. Richness measures, except shrub and tree richness, were greater than baseline through the course of the experiment, suggesting richness increased after horses were removed. The floristic composition of the groundstorey vegetation matched the putative pre-European conditions. Exotic species richness was notably low (<6.5% of total species richness) at the start of the experiment and declined thereafter, and exotic cover did not exceed 3.0% per exclosure quadrat at any sampling time. Most grazing lawns were dominated by kangaroo grass. Grassy woodland with kangaroo grass dominant in the groundstorey vegetation on Paddys Plateau in GFRNP has resisted more than a 100 years of livestock and horse grazing, suggesting that the intensity of livestock grazing over this period has been comparatively light. However, the general increase in plant cover and species richness measures, the progressive establishment of tussocky poa in sites in which it was absent at the start of the experiment due to historical higher cattle and horse grazing, and the lesser baseline cover of kangaroo grass in those same sites suggested horses contributed to minor retrogressive shifts in composition that were not detected in this experiment due to the reduction in horse grazing pressure. 7.2.3 Chapter 5: impact of feral horses on the groundstorey vegetation of grassy riparian flats in gorge country The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Factors Influencing Sub-Adult Mortality of Eastern Grey Kangaroos in the ACT
    FACTORS INFLUENCING SUB- ADULT MORTALITY EVENTS IN EASTERN GREY KANGAROOS (MACROPUS GIGANTEUS) IN THE ACT FEBRUARY 2018 Tim Portas and Melissa Snape Conservation Research Technical Report © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2018 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without the written permission from: Director-General, Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, GPO Box 158 Canberra ACT 2601. ISBN 978-1-921117-49-7 Published by the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government Visit the EPSDD Website Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views, opinions or policy of funding bodies or participating member agencies or organisations. This publication should be cited as: Portas TJ and Snape MA (2018). Factors influencing sub-adult mortality events in Eastern Grey Kangaroos (Macropus giganetus) in the ACT. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, Canberra. Accessibility The ACT Government is committed to making its information, services, events and venues as accessible as possible. If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, such as large print, please phone Access Canberra on 13 22 81 or email the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate at [email protected]. If English is not your first language and you require a translating and interpreting service, please phone 13 14 50. If you are deaf, or have a speech or hearing impairment, and need the teletypewriter service, please phone 13 36 77 and ask for Access Canberra on 13 22 81.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Values and to Identify New Values
    FLORISTIC VALUES OF THE TASMANIAN WILDERNESS WORLD HERITAGE AREA J. Balmer, J. Whinam, J. Kelman, J.B. Kirkpatrick & E. Lazarus Nature Conservation Branch Report October 2004 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (World Heritage Area Vegetation Program). Commonwealth Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment or those of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. ISSN 1441–0680 Copyright 2003 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Published by Nature Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph: Alpine bolster heath (1050 metres) at Mt Anne. Stunted Nothofagus cunninghamii is shrouded in mist with Richea pandanifolia scattered throughout and Astelia alpina in the foreground. Photograph taken by Grant Dixon Back Cover Photograph: Nothofagus gunnii leaf with fossil imprint in deposits dating from 35-40 million years ago: Photograph taken by Greg Jordan Cite as: Balmer J., Whinam J., Kelman J., Kirkpatrick J.B. & Lazarus E. (2004) A review of the floristic values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2004/3. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, Tasmania, Australia T ABLE OF C ONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation Communities Native Grassland
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Native grassland Themeda australis Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark (revised - October 2017) 1 Native grassland Community (Code) Page Coastal grass and herbfield (GHC) 5 Highland Poa grassland (GPH) 7 Lowland grassland complex (GCL) 9 Lowland grassy sedgeland (GSL) 11 Lowland Poa labillardierei grassland (GPL) 12 Lowland Themeda triandra grassland (GTL) 14 Rockplate grassland (GRP) 16 General description align the key and the description of Lowland grassland complex ( ) with respect to the Native grasslands are defined as areas of native GCL required cover of native grass species. In 2017 vegetation dominated by native grasses with few or further minor revisions were made to improve no emergent woody species. Different types of information for general management issues, and to native grassland can be found in a variety of habitats, improve the description of Coastal grass and including coastal fore-dunes, dry slopes and valley herbfield (GHC) and its differentiation from Lowland bottoms, rock plates and subalpine flats. The lowland Poa labillardierei grassland (GPL). This is reflected in temperate grassland types have been recognised as the key to this Section. some of the most threatened vegetation communities in Australia. General management issues Some areas of native grassland are human-induced Most lowland native grassland in Tasmania has been and exist as a result of heavy burning, tree clearing cleared for agriculture since European settlement or dieback of the tree layer in grassy woodlands. (Barker 1999, Gilfedder 1990, Kirkpatrick et al. 1988, There are seven grassland communities recognised Kirkpatrick 1991, Williams et al. 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts
    Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts A Report commissioned by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service June 2007 Department of Primary Industries and Water ARTHUR-PIEMAN CONSERVATION AREA Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts A Report commissioned by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service June 2007 Resource Management & Conservation Division Department of Primary Industries and Water Hobart, Tasmania APCA Vehicle Track Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts i __________________________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT NOTE This report was commissioned by the Parks and Wildlife Service to assist a process to determine appropriate management of vehicular tracks in Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area. The recommendations in the report are based on an assessment of natural values (geoconservation, flora and fauna) only. They do not take account of cultural values, which are the subject of a separate assessment, and other factors. Decisions concerning management of the vehicle tracks are the responsibility of the Parks and Wildlife Service. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Resource Management and Conservation Division of the Department of Primary Industries and Water prepared this report with input from Michael Comfort, Rolan Eberhard, Richard Schahinger, Chris Sharples and Shaun Thurstans. Comments were received from the following RMC staff: Michael Askey- Doran, Jason Bradbury, Sally Bryant, Stephen Harris, Ian Houshold, Michael Pemberton and Greg Pinkard. Staff from the Parks and Wildlife Service at Arthur River provided assistance in the field and generously shared their collective knowledge. Air photos used in this study were orthorectified by Matt Dell and John Corbett. The Arthur-Pieman Vehicle Tracks Assessment Project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust through Cradle Coast NRM.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardens and Stewardship
    GARDENS AND STEWARDSHIP Thaddeus Zagorski (Bachelor of Theology; Diploma of Education; Certificate 111 in Amenity Horticulture; Graduate Diploma in Environmental Studies with Honours) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2007 School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for any other degree or graduate diploma by the University of Tasmania or in any other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by other persons, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis or in footnotes. Thaddeus Zagorski University of Tasmania Date: This thesis may be made available for loan or limited copying in accordance with the Australian Copyright Act of 1968. Thaddeus Zagorski University of Tasmania Date: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is not merely the achievement of a personal goal, but a culmination of a journey that started many, many years ago. As culmination it is also an impetus to continue to that journey. In achieving this personal goal many people, supervisors, friends, family and University colleagues have been instrumental in contributing to the final product. The initial motivation and inspiration for me to start this study was given by Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick, Dr. Elaine Stratford, and my friend Alison Howman. For that challenge I thank you. I am deeply indebted to my three supervisors Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick, Dr. Elaine Stratford and Dr. Aidan Davison. Each in their individual, concerted and special way guided me to this omega point.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Values of the TWWH 2013 Extension
    Natural Values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area 2013 Extension - Central North Sector Nature Conservation Report 20/3 DeparNaturalt mentand Cultural of Heritage PrDepartmentimaryNatural Industr of Values Primaryies, PaSurveyrk Industries,s, W• 2013ater TWWHA Parks,and En Water vExtensionironmen And Area, tEnvironment Central North Sector 1 Natural Values of the TWWHA Extension - Central North Sector Edited by Elise Dewar Document design by Land Tasmania Design Unit © Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment This report was prepared under the direction of the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Program). Australian Government funds contributed to the project. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Governments. ISSN: 1838-7403 (electronic) Front cover photograph by Micah Visoiu; overlooking the headwaters of Brumby Creek in the TWWHA Cite as: DPIPWE (2020). Natural values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area 2013 Extension – Central North Sector. Nature Conservation Report 20/3, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart Natural Values Survey • 2013 TWWHA Extension Area, Central North Sector 2 KEY FINDINGS In 2013, an area of 172,276 ha was added to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA). A review of the known natural values for this extension and the threats to those values highlighted significant knowledge gaps (Balmeret al., 2017). To redress these knowedge gaps, at least partially, a multi-disciplinary survey was undertaken in November 2019 to document flora, fauna and geodiversity values in part of the extension area known as the Central North Sector (CNS).
    [Show full text]
  • ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGEMENT PLANMANAGEMENT PLAN ACT KANGAROO 2014 - Kangaroo MP COVER.Indd 1
    ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGEMENT KANGAROO ACT ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014 - Kangaroo MP COVER.indd 1 31/03/10 1:32 PM ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN Book 1.indb 1 31/03/10 1:31 PM ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN ISBN 978-0-642-60523-8 Conservation Series: ISSN 1036-0441: 25 © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without the written permission of Parks, Conservation and Lands, Department of Territory and Municipal Services, PO Box 158 Canberra ACT 2601. Published by Territory and Municipal Services (10/0022) Website: www.tams.gov.au Phone: Canberra Connect 13 22 81 Design: Big Island Graphics Page ii Book 1.indb 2 31/03/10 1:31 PM ACT KANGAROO MANAGEMENT PLAN Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. vii Ministerial Foreword ........................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... ix 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Kangaroos and wallabies in the ACT ..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics of Eastern Grey Kangaroos in Temperate Grasslands
    Population Dynamics of Eastern Grey Kangaroos in Temperate Grasslands Don Fletcher BA Institute of Applied Ecology University of Canberra A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Science at the University of Canberra 2006 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply appreciative of the support and guidance of my principal supervisor Prof. Jim Hone, throughout the project. His commitment to principles of scientific method in applied ecology, his knowledge of the literature, the breadth of his interests, and his patience, were inspiring. I also thank Stephen Sarre, my second supervisor, for his successful effort to complement what Jim provided, for constructive and friendly advice and criticism and for broadening my knowledge of the application of molecular biology to ecology. My employer, Environment ACT, supported the project in various ways throughout, especially in tolerating my absence from the office when I was undertaking fieldwork or working at the University of Canberra. I particularly thank the manager of the research group at Environment ACT, Dr David Shorthouse, for dedicated and patient support, and for ably defending the project at the necessary times, and my colleague Murray Evans who carried an extra workload in 2002–03 in my absence. I also thank the former manager of the ACT Parks and Conservation Service, Tony Corrigan, for enlisting support at a crucial time when the project was commencing. The former Marsupial CRC, particularly its leader, John Rodger, supported the project handsomely with a cash grant without which it would not have commenced. I want to thank the Applied Ecology Research Group (now the Institute of Applied Ecology) for friendly support.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan
    Daisy Dell Reserve 2018-2022 Management Plan www.tasland.org.au Tasmanian Land Conservancy (2018). Daisy Dell Reserve Management Plan 2018-2022. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, Tasmania, Australia. Copyright ©Tasmanian Land Conservancy The views expressed in this document are those of the Tasmanian Land Conservancy and not any other person or organisation. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgment of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Tasmanian Land Conservancy. Front Image: Spotted-tailed quoll in Daisy Dell rainforest © Heath Holden Contact Address Tasmanian Land Conservancy PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, 827 Sandy Bay Road, Sandy Bay TAS 7005 | p: 03 6225 1399 | www.tasland.org.au | Daisy Dell Reserve Management Plan 2018-2022 2 Contents Reserve Management Framework ......................................................................................................................... 4 Daisy Dell Reserve Management Overview ............................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Context and natural values. ............................................................................................................................... 7 Conservation Targets
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Climate Change Impacts on Geodiversity in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: a Management Response Position Paper
    Potential Climate Change Impacts Potential Potential Climate Change Impacts on Geodiversity in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: on Geodiversity Geodiversity A Management Response Position Paper in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: Area: Heritage World Wilderness Tasmanian A Management Response Position Paper Position A Management Response A Consultant Report to the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania By: Chris Sharples Consultant November 2011 Nature Conservation Report Series 11/04 10630BL NIO M O UN IM D R T IA A L • P • W L O A I R D L D N H O E M R I E Resource Management and Conservation T IN A G O E • IM 134 Macquarie Street Hobart PATR United Nations World GPO Box 44 Hobart TAS 7001 Department of Educational, Scientific and Heritage Cultural Organization www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Citation: Sharples, C. (2011) Potential climate change impacts on geodiversity in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: A management response position paper. Resource Management and Conservation Division, Department of Primary Industries Parks Water and Environment, Hobart, Nature Conservation Report Series 11/04. This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (World Heritage Area geodiversity program). Commonwealth Government funds were provided for this project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment or those of the Department of Sustainability Environment Water Population and Communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Daisy Dell Reserve Background Reportfile
    Daisy Dell Reserve Background Report www.tasland.org.au Tasmanian Land Conservancy (2018). Daisy Dell Reserve Background Report. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, Tasmania Australia. Copyright ©Tasmanian Land Conservancy The views expressed in this report are those of the Tasmanian Land Conservancy. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgment of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Tasmanian Land Conservancy. Front Image: Daisy Dell wetland © Chris Crerar Contact Address Tasmanian Land Conservancy PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, 827 Sandy Bay Road, Sandy Bay TAS 7005 | ph: 03 6225 1399 | www.tasland.org.au Table of Contents Background ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Fundraising Campaign ...................................................................................................................... 3 Location and Context ........................................................................................................................ 3 Access ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Legal Status ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of the Open Forest and Indigenous Grasslands
    Chapter 6: The Transformation of the Open Forest and Indigenous Grasslands Hunter’s River, without any flourish, is a fine settlement; the whole country appeared as if it wanted mowing – large flocks and herds are fast accumulating and many settlers are investing considerable property in building, fencing and clearing. All are rising into that desirable condition of having bread enough and to spare. In a few years they will constitute a powerful squirealty, truly enviable, if they preserve the free, guileless, open and generous character of an English country gentleman. (Monitor: 23/6/1826). Introduction The European settlers walked into manicured indigenous parkland with a rich diversity of grasses and forbs, see Box 6.1. The transformation of this grassland was to be rapid and irreversible. This chapter deals with that transformation and brings it to the context of the present day where a range of exotic grasses, eucalypts and cattle compete to dominate the landscape together with a changing series of influences from humans. The transformation of the landscape has been significant and the factors involved are complex. Chapter 3 on the Indigenous influences concluded with a description of the vegetation of Tocal as we believe it would have been prior to the arrival of Europeans. This analysis and map should be seen as the starting point for the contents of this chapter. Europeans inherited a rich and diverse grassland system, dotted with trees and a broad biodiversity of plant life. The River would have been fringed with a significant rainforest and wetland vegetation complex, which imparted stability to the ecosystem.
    [Show full text]