DOCSLIB.ORG

General Coordination Meeting (GCM) – Kyiv, Ukraine 14 December, Aleksanyan Room Draft Discussion Action Points/Decisions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Coordination Meeting (GCM) – Kyiv, Ukraine 14 December, Aleksanyan Room Draft Discussion Action Points/Decisions General Coordination Meeting (GCM) – Kyiv, Ukraine 14 December, Aleksanyan Room Draft Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Political situation update The Minsk process: During the 24th OSCE Ministerial Council 2017 in Vienna on 8 December, informal and bilateral discussion took place on the situation in Donbas and humanitarian aspects of the conflict. The American-Russian bilateral dialogue has entered a reassessment phase, estimated to last until the second part of January 2018. Lack of peace initiatives is likely to last until the Russian Presidential elections, taking place in March 2018. At the same time, the end of the year has brought spikes in violence and increased hostilities in conflict-affected areas. Exchange of detainees: The exchange of 304 individuals was temporarily put on hold due to reported technical issues. These issues should reportedly be addressed by 20 December during the last meeting of Trilateral Contact Group (TCG) in 2017. 2. Security situation update Eastern Conflict Area (ECA): Hostilities have increased since mid-October in the conflict-affected areas, as number of civilian casualties continued to rise. The situation deteriorated with 24 civilian casualties in October and 25 casualties in November. In the recent past, three settlements of Hladosove, Travneve and Verkhniotoretske (Donetska oblast) were taken under control by the Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) and are accessible through GCA. One humanitarian organization recently concluded a short assessment mission and noted that the needs in these settlements are significant, while active hostilities and presence of mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) continue posing serious risk to local residents. Overall, civilian infrastructure was shelled in both GCA and NGCA, in particular in the areas of Avdiivka, Dokuchaevsk, Horlivka, Krasnyi Partizan, Perovmaisk. INSO added that the intensity of the conflict is reaching levels to those of the start of the year. In November, the level of accidents was the highest and it is projected to raise even more resulting in critical civilian infrastructure damage, which have doubled in last two months. Of these, at least five incidents of shelling affected the Donetsk Filter Station (DFS) and Verkhionkalmiuska Filter Station (VFS), which are located in the proximity of the ‘contact line’. Some 12 settlements have experienced electricity disruption, lasting from a few minutes up to days due to continuous shelling. Usage of heavy weapons have increased by 64 per cent. UNDSS also added that since the ‘contact line’ slightly changed, there might be a risk for an increased shelling of villages, which were previously not directly affected. This will most likely mean increased humanitarian needs and requiring further assistance. UNDSS also noted that security risk assessments of these villages would have to be made on “case-by-case” basis for each mission. Field mission preparations: UNDSS stressed the importance for agencies to prepare their vehicles for winter conditions before travelling to any field location and having clear escape routes in case of evacuation identified. It is also advisable to ask the staff at the CPs for their analysis on the security situation, which might change drastically on a regular basis. Nine kilometres from the ‘contact line’ on both sides is the most dangerous area and it was recommended not to drive on unpaved roads due to the risk of mines and UXO. Multiple incidents involving UN: Over the period of November and early December, UNDSS reports that number of incidents when humanitarian convoys and/or vehicles were stopped at checkpoints by uniformed guards and civilians for inspection continue to increase. Humanitarian actors face increased difficulties in accessing remote villages, on both side of the ‘contact line’. Mainland Ukraine: Events around Saakashvili and his supporters causes increased risk for civil unrest. The number of public demonstrations in Kyiv has increased, and UNDSS stressed the importance of avoiding areas, where demonstrations are taking place. If it takes place nearby the office, alternative work modality should be put in place. It is also recommended to keep track of belongings, when being at the central train station, as an increased number of thefts have been reported. 3. Humanitarian situation update Humanitarian needs: Increased number of hostilities around the critical civilian infrastructure, such as the DFS and consequent disruption of water and heating supply systems, as well as potential environmental consequences may deteriorate the humanitarian situation during the winter months. On the DFS, OCHA briefed that according to the Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Territories and Internally Displaced Persons (MTOT) the liquid gas bottles have been removed and were replaced by powder required for water purification. OHCHR recently released a quarterly report, highlighting the correlation between causalities figures and ceasefire implementation. As per analysis, when the ceasefire holds, there are lower number of ceasefire casualties. A concern was raised on the access to the villages of Travene and Hladosove. UNDSS clarified that the villages are accessible, but recommends only critical missions for delivery of humanitarian assistance due to poor road conditions and insecurity. OCHA reminded about the recent mission to the settlement of Travneve in which an estimated 100 civilians reside and the mission report that was previously circulated to the humanitarian partners operating in that particular geographic area. OCHA highlighted the importance of ATO Civil-Military Co-Operation (CIMIC), as a source of information on humanitarian needs (e.g.: CMCoord of the ATO has repaired parts of the road leading to the villages). A few other UN agencies have already visited the settlements, but further needs assessment is needed. It was reported that the State Emergency Service (SES) has not provided any assistance to the civilians living in any of those three villages. Food Security and Livelihoods Cluster (FSLC) informed on recent delivery of food parcels to Travneve and Hladosove by ICRC and Caritas. The Cluster also briefed participants on updated information on the Food Security Cluster website. Freedom of movement: The number of individual crossings at all Entry-Exit Checkpoints (EECP) has decreased over the last week, with 10 per cent compared to similar trend in previous month, which might be due to the upcoming holidays. Communication: Participants noted the importance of not using the term “frozen”, as the conflict is active with daily shelling and increased insecurity. This will may potentially diminish the ongoing communication efforts, which aim to raise the humanitarian profile and human cost of the crisis to international spotlight. The meeting participants also highlighted the importance of constant media coverage with human stories, including photos to raise the awareness of the humanitarian profile of the crisis. Ukraine 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) Launch: The 2018 HRP was launched on 4 December in Kyiv, by the Humanitarian Coordinator (HC), together with the Minister of MTOT. On 7 December, the Humanitarian Coordinator (HC) launched the 2018 HRP and briefed some 50 Member States and international organizations on the ongoing humanitarian situation. The Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations in Geneva, the representative of Swiss Development and Cooperation Agency and Save the Children were also on the podium as keynote speakers. Both of the events were followed by press briefings, press releases and communication campaign through social media, which contributed to raising the awareness around the Ukraine 2018 HRP. The key figures stemming out of the 2018 HRP include: • 4.4 million people affected • 3.4 million people need humanitarian assistance and protection • Of these 1.8 million people live in NGCA • 0.6 million people live along “contact line” • And 1 million people live in GCA • The 2018 HRP asks for US$187 million to reach with assistance and protection some 2.3 million people, who are the most vulnerable Humanitarian Dashboard: On 13 December, the latest Humanitarian Dashboard covering the period of January – September 2017 was released. The dashboard contains updated information on the humanitarian response and provides an overview of people reached by different clusters, cluster partners and agencies outside of the HRP. • IOM to present the NMS 4. Update from partners Report at the next GCM to IOM recently released the National Monitoring System (NMS) Report. The main findings are that the IDPs lack access to shelter and employment take place on and often face discrimination. A presentation on the latest round of the NMS will be given at the next GCM in January. Friday, 12 January. 5. AOB The next General Coordination Meeting (GCM) is scheduled for Friday, 12 January. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 November 2017 to 15
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 November 2017 to 15 February 2018 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Executive summary ............................................................................................ 1–16 1 II. Rights to life, liberty, security and physical integrity ........................................... 17–41 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................... 17–24 3 B. Deprivation of liberty, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment, and conflict-related sexual violence ........................................................... 25–41 6 1. Access to places of detention ........................................................... 25–27 6 2. Deprivation of liberty, enforced dis-appearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment, and conflict related sexual violence ......................... 28–35 6 3. Situation of pre-conflict prisoners ................................................... 36–41 7 III. Accountability and administration of justice ........................................................ 42–55 9 A. Accountability for human rights violations and abuses committed in the east 42 9 B. Fair trial rights ............................................................................................ 43–48 9 C. High-profile cases of violence related to riots and public disturbances ......... 49–55 10 1. Accountability for the killings of protesters at Maidan ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Luhanska Oblast REFERENCE MAP for Humanitarian Purposes Only As of November 2017 Production Date: 20 November 2017
    UKRAINE - Luhanska oblast REFERENCE MAP For Humanitarian Purposes Only Production date: 20 November 2017 As of November 2017 Shevchenkove Hohyne Slyzneve Vilkhuvatka Petropavlivka Novooleksandrivka Prykolotne Kurhanne Dovhenke Hannopillia Malyi Kotivka Malakhove Harbuzivka Yurivka Burluk Milove Mykolaivka Fedorivka Khatnie Berezhne Pohorile Pidserednie Doroshenkove Shevchenkove Ambarne Novoselivka Vovchanskyi Mykhailivka Krasnoiarske Kyrylivka Horiane raion Siryi Buriakivka Velykoburlutskyi Zamist Sonino Seredivka Moskalivka Yar raion Odradne Velykyi Burluk Hryhorivka Bolohivka Didivka Hnylytsia Balka Syrotyne Yaiechne Obukhivka Stroivka Paskivka Hannivka Persha Ploske Zhukiv Demyno-Oleksandrivka Mykilske Novouzhvynivka Yar Dvorichanske Harashkivka Lebedivka Mantsivka Hnylytsia Holubivka Topoli Borshchova Katerynivka Kolodiazne Kupievakha Shatkivka Zelenyi Chervona Rodnychky Hai Khvylia Kamianka Pisky Bahachka Kanivtseve Rohozianka Arkushyne Vesele Novovasylivka Lyman Topoli Pishchanka Rozsypne Sadovod Druhyi Lantrativka Zelenyi Shypuvate Krasne Poltavske Artemivka Nova Andriivka Mytrofanivka Hai Nova Vodiane Pershe Dzherelne Maslivka Oleksandrivka Shypuvate Petrivka Pavlivka Babycheve Oleksandrivka Petro-Ivanivka Nezhdanivka Zaitseve Voievodske Pechenizkyi Ridkodub Mykolaivka Nesterivka Pryliutove Dvorichanskyi Troitske Maksymivka Zahiria raion Stetskivka Putnykove Shevchenkove Serednii Fyholivka raion Solontsi Berezivka Prosianka Krasne Burluk Mykolaivka Kasianivka Dovhenke Bohdanivske Maltsivka Polkovnyche Shyshkivka Novomlynsk Terny
    [Show full text]
  • “People's Republics” of Eastern Ukraine
    Nikolaus von Twickel Current events in the “People’s Republics” of eastern Ukraine Interim Report 2018 Civic monitoring of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Region Imprint DRA e.V. Badstraße 44 D-13357 Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30 446 680 12 Fax. +49 (0)30 446 680 10 [email protected] www.austausch.org www.civicmonitoring.org Project: Human Rights Monitoring in Eastern Ukraine Implemented with support from the Federal Foreign Office of Germany Author of the report: Nikolaus von Twickel Editor: Tim Bohse Photos: Title page: “Industrial city Donetsk” (2013) by Vladimir Yaitskiy, used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic licence, desaturated from original. All opinions included in this report do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. Copyright © DRA 2018 Reproduction of the content is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. Content Politics 4 Security 6 Economy 7 Human rights and civil society 8 Prospects 9 Short chronology 10 Endnotes 11 Preface Overall, the fundamentals governing the conflict remain unchanged. There are strong indications that Moscow’s goal is to maintain hotbeds of instability and deeply anti- 2018 saw major political tensions in separatist-controlled western Trojan Horses in Ukraine’s flank. Under these Donetsk, culminating in the assassination of local leader circumstances, the best Ukraine can do is project good Alexander Zakharchenko on August 31. Power in the governance and prosperity into the areas it does not Donetsk “People’s Republic” (“DNR”) subsequently shifted control and hope that the growing economic burden and/ to Denis Pushilin, the longtime Minsk negotiator, who has or ungovernability will make Russia rethink its support for a reputation of being highly manageable and of having the “People’s Republics”.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerabilities
    UKRAINE Capacity & Vulnerability Assessment Toretsk Municipality, Government Controlled Area November-December 2018 Introduction Methodology Armed conflict between the forces of the significantly. The assessment began with a secondary The populations of interest in this study are: Government of Ukraine (GoU) and opposition data review in order to identify the main internally displaced persons (IDPs), non- This Capacity and Vulnerability Assessment groups in the territory of Donbas will enter its service providers in the raion. REACH used displaced populations and service providers (CVA) monitors and analyses the challenges sixth year in 2019. The conflict is concentrated geospatial data from the main mapping in Toretsk Municipality. The research used identified during the Area-Based Assessment around the contact line separating the services in Ukraine to map the settlements of a stratified random sample with four strata (ABA) of July 20173. The key issues identified government controlled area (GCA) from the assessed area and identify the locations (Table 1). by the ABA of Toretsk were distance, cost of non-government controlled area (NGCA) of of service providers and catchement areas of transport and security risks while accessing The HH survey component of primary Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.1 these providers. services. Using a network approach, this study data collection included 769 in-person HH The Municipality of Toretsk, officially known as also maps the basic service delivery capacities Primary data collection was conducted from interviews across settlements of Toretsk the Toretsk City Council2, is located along the at the facility level and access to services at 30th Nov – 14th Dec 2018, and included key Municipality located in the GCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Access in Eastern Ukraine: an Overview
    HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN EASTERN UKRAINE: AN OVERVIEW Kyiv 2019 This monitoring was carried out by the Charitable Fund «Right to Protection» (R2P) under the project «Provision of Multi-Sectoral Humanitarian Assistance to Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine» which is implemented by R2P with the financial support of the European Commission, within the framework of civil protection and humanitarian assistance of the European Union within the ACCESS consortium. This document covers humanitarian aid activities implemented with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein should not be taken, in any way, to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN EASTERN UKRAINE: AN OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION 3 Imperative: Even without delving into the context of the Ukrainian armed conflict, it is evident that the situation with humanitarian access at the beginning of 2019 is fundamentally different from the one observed in 2014-2015. Of course, this is due to both the dynamics of the conflict and the intensity of confrontations, political and diplomatic achievements, the formation of a provisional line of contact and the establishment of control over certain areas by one of the parties to the conflict, as well as with the establishment of a humanitarian framework. That is, in the development of the conflict and by gaining experience in responding to the related extraordinary events, in the specific field conditions, all the response actors (including relevant government agencies, armed forces, law enforcement agencies, local self-government bodies, international humanitarian organizations, national NGOs, volunteer associations and civil society institutions) have developed, adapted and implemented a number of rules and mechanisms, which undoubtedly has had a positive impact on the speed and adequacy of responding to consequences of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT by MR. ALEXANDER LUKASHEVICH, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION, at the 1168Th MEETING of the OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL
    PC.DEL/1688/17 14 December 2017 ENGLISH Original: RUSSIAN Delegation of the Russian Federation STATEMENT BY MR. ALEXANDER LUKASHEVICH, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, AT THE 1168th MEETING OF THE OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL 14 December 2017 On the situation in Ukraine and the need to implement the Minsk agreements Mr. Chairperson, The negotiations on a draft OSCE Vienna Ministerial Council declaration on the Ukrainian crisis highlighted the continuing attempts to distort the meaning of the Minsk agreements and devalue their political part. A comprehensive political settlement, as set out in the Package of Measures, ought to bring stability to Ukraine. This settlement calls for constitutional reform, consolidating the special status of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, along with local elections, the enactment of the amnesty law and non-prosecution in connection with the events in Donbas. We were interested in adopting a document that would have underpinned the Package of Measures with the consensus support of the 57 participating States in addition to United Nations Security Council resolution 2202, and would have provided a proper assessment of the activities of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), the Trilateral Contact Group and its working groups. However, some participating States had no interest in this. The slogans about what the Ukrainians refer to as “Russian aggression” are a propaganda cover for the desire to maintain the conflict. We will know that there is a willingness to really achieve a peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis when we see steps to end the punitive operation against the inhabitants of Donbas, and efforts to curb rather than legitimize the nationalists provoking exchanges of fire at the line of contact and engaged in violence and looting.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna
    The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document FSC.DEL/229/20 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 7 October 2020 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH only Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 957th FSC Plenary Meeting on Russia’s ongoing aggression against Ukraine and illegal occupation of Crimea (7 October 2020, Vienna, Hofburg, also via video teleconferencing) (Agenda item 2, General Statements) Madame Chairperson, On behalf of the Delegation of Ukraine let me deliver a statement on the subject of Russia’s ongoing aggression against Ukraine and illegal occupation of Crimea. During the last two months, the overall security situation in the conflict area in Donbas remained relatively calm, marked by sporadic untargeted, however provocative, ceasefire violations by the armed formations of the Russian Federation, mainly from small arms. Heavy weapons, forbidden by the Minsk Agreements, were not used. These positive developments, as well as some other improvements on the ground, are promising in view of holding a possible meeting of the leaders of the Normandy 4 countries in order to further proceed with peaceful resolution of the conflict. Despite this glimpse of progress in adherence to ceasefire, during the week from 28 September through 4 October the armed formations of the Russian Federation resorted to armed provocations and committed other violations of the Agreement of the TCG on additional measures to strengthen ceasefire, reached on 22 July.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the Events in the »People's Republics« of Eastern
    Nikolaus von Twickel Annual Report on the Events in the »People’s Republics« of Eastern Ukraine 2017 Civic monitoring of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Region Imprint DRA e.V. Badstraße 44 D-13357 Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30 446 680 12 Fax. +49 (0)30 446 680 10 [email protected] www.austausch.org www.civicmonitoring.org Project: Human Rights Monitoring in Eastern Ukraine Implemented with support from the Federal Foreign Office of Germany Author of the report: Nikolaus von Twickel Editor: Tim Bohse Photos: Title page »Donetsk« by https://www.flickr.com/photos/purele used under creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/, desaturated from original. All opinions included in this report do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. Copyright © DRA 2018 Reproduction of the content is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. Foreword Summary Four years after the beginning of the war in eastern Those hoping that eastern Ukraine’s Russian-controlled Ukraine, the armed conflict remains in stalemate. The »people’s republics« may soon return to their homeland terrible conditions for Ukrainians living in the conflict suffered significant setbacks last year. The trade blockade zone have not improved in 2017 and the political tensions and the ensuing seizure of industrial assets hammered that prevent a lasting diplomatic solution remain. another wedge between them and the rest of Ukraine, Understanding the current situation requires an analysis while separatist hardliners triumphed in Luhansk, ousting of what is happening within the self-declared »people’s local separatist leader Igor Plotnitsky in November.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), Based on Information Received As of 19:30, 26 November 2017 | OSCE
    11/27/2017 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 26 November 2017 | OSCE Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 26 November 2017 KYIV 27 November 2017 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded more ceasere violations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions between the evenings of 24 and 25 November compared with the previous reporting period. In both regions the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations between the evenings of 25 and 26 November compared with the previous 24 hours. The SMM heard from soldiers and residents that Ukrainian Armed Forces had moved into the village of Travneve on 21-22 November. Some residents of Travneve told the SMM that they had been without electricity since 16 November. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasere violations inside the Petrivske disengagement area. It followed up on reports of a civilian casualty in Popasna and observed damage caused by shelling in Dokuchaievsk and Holmivskyi. Its access remained restricted in the disengagement areas and elsewhere, including at a Ukrainian Armed Forces weapons holding area.* The Mission saw weapons in violation of withdrawal lines near Volnovakha. The SMM visited seven border areas outside of government control. The SMM monitored a gathering in front of the regional prosecutor’s oce in Odessa. In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 24 and 25 November, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations[1], including about 400 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 60 explosions).
    [Show full text]
  • General Coordination Meeting – Mariupol, Ukraine 13 July 2018
    General Coordination Meeting – Mariupol, Ukraine 13 July 2018 Discussion Action points/Decisions OVERVIEW OF THE HUMANITARIAN SITUATION United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs provided the following update to the partners: - The security situation remains tense, despite the so-called “harvest ceasefire” introduced on 1 July. Hostilities resulted in five civilians being injured, while damages of civilian houses were reported in Chermalyk, Zaitseve and Chyhari; - Mines and other explosive remnants of war continue posing a threat to the civilian population. Three civilians were injured as a result of mine-related incidents, including two children; - Hostilities put water supply on both sides of the “contact line” at risk. On 6 June, Donetsk Filter Station (DFS) providing water to some 345,000 people suspended its operation after shelling incident. On 9 June, the operation of DFS was resumed after working brigades had obtained access to the damaged site; - Protection Cluster called partners to submit their comments to the Project Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On approving the procedure for entry of individuals and transfer of goods to the temporarily occupied territories in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and exit of individuals and transfer of goods from such territories” by 3 July. Comments that are not submitted by the deadline can be sent to the Ministry of Defense directly; - On 13 June during the session, Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine excluded Hladosove and Travneve in Donetsk oblast, and Novooleksandrivka in Luhansk oblast from the list of settlements where authorities temporarily do not execute their powers. It will significantly improve the access of residents to their social entitlements; - On 26 June, Inter-Agency Rapid Assessment training was held in Kramatorsk.
    [Show full text]
  • Sloviansk Donetsk GCA Subnational Cluster Meeting 26Th March 2018
    Sloviansk Donetsk GCA Subnational Cluster Meeting 26th March 2018 Agenda: 1. Roundtable introduction of Participants 2. Review of the previous meeting decisions 3. Shelter Cluster inputs 4. Information Management Updates: recent 5W, Winterization Matrix, Damage DB 5. Coordination issues and solutions 6. Review of current referrals for Shelter/ NFI assistance 7. Update from Partners on Winterization activities, on Damages and Repair plans 8. AOB and Wrap-up Present: Ministry of TOTs and IDPs Donetsk Sector, CF SSS/ Ministry of Social Policy, UNHCR, ADRA Ukraine, PIN, ICRC, REACH Initiative, Save the Children, NRC, DRC Reviewing Previous Action Points The Subnational Cluster Co-Chair opened the meeting with roundtable introduction. As usually, the action points from the previous Subnational meeting were the first clause of Agenda to discuss: Action point Who Status Share the link to the 2017 Shelter Cluster Annual Report Shelter Cluster Team Done Share the link to Winterization interactive map Shelter Cluster Team Done Shelter Cluster to hold joint meeting with partners (ADRA, PIN, Shelter Cluster Team Done DRC, NRC) on discussion of coordination issues Partners to share with the Cluster their the lists of addresses in ADRA, PIN, DRC, NRC Done prioritized locations Shelter Cluster to cross-check addresses provided by partners Shelter Cluster Team Done Partners to keep coordination contact with each other and share ADRA, PIN, DRC, NRC Done with the Cluster the ultimate result of interactions thereon To make practical use of Technical Note
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mines, Unexploded Ordnance and Other Explosive Objects on Civilians in the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions of Eastern Ukraine
    THE IMPACT OF MINES, UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE AND OTHER EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS ON CIVILIANS IN THE DONETSK AND LUHANSK REGIONS OF EASTERN UKRAINE January 2018 — October 2019 December 2019 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2019 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Framework of obligations and mechanisms for implementation 7 Presence of mines and UXO in eastern Ukraine 9 Civilian casualties due to mines and other explosive objects 11 Impact of mines and other explosive objects on civilian freedom of movement 14 Mines and unexploded ordnance near EECP’s and checkpoints 14 Agricultural lands 17 Contaminated rivers and riverbanks 18 Mines and other explosive objects in and near cemeteries 19 Presence of mines and UXO around critical civilian infrastructure 21 Mines and other explosive objects around education facilities 24 Mine risk education activities 26 Impact on SMM`s freedom of movement 28 Conclusion 29 3 Since 2014, the OSCE Special Monitoring Mine contamination around civilian Mission to Ukraine (SMM) has been infrastructure, such as water pipelines and monitoring and reporting on the impact of the gas distribution stations, many of which are conflict on civilians in Donetsk and Luhansk located along the contact line, pose risks to regions of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]