Vulnerabilities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vulnerabilities UKRAINE Capacity & Vulnerability Assessment Toretsk Municipality, Government Controlled Area November-December 2018 Introduction Methodology Armed conflict between the forces of the significantly. The assessment began with a secondary The populations of interest in this study are: Government of Ukraine (GoU) and opposition data review in order to identify the main internally displaced persons (IDPs), non- This Capacity and Vulnerability Assessment groups in the territory of Donbas will enter its service providers in the raion. REACH used displaced populations and service providers (CVA) monitors and analyses the challenges sixth year in 2019. The conflict is concentrated geospatial data from the main mapping in Toretsk Municipality. The research used identified during the Area-Based Assessment around the contact line separating the services in Ukraine to map the settlements of a stratified random sample with four strata (ABA) of July 20173. The key issues identified government controlled area (GCA) from the assessed area and identify the locations (Table 1). by the ABA of Toretsk were distance, cost of non-government controlled area (NGCA) of of service providers and catchement areas of transport and security risks while accessing The HH survey component of primary Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.1 these providers. services. Using a network approach, this study data collection included 769 in-person HH The Municipality of Toretsk, officially known as also maps the basic service delivery capacities Primary data collection was conducted from interviews across settlements of Toretsk the Toretsk City Council2, is located along the at the facility level and access to services at 30th Nov – 14th Dec 2018, and included key Municipality located in the GCA. The sample contact line in the GCA of the Donetsk oblast. the household (HH) level in order to identify informant interviews (KIIs), community key is statistically representative of HHs in each In 2014, the main city of the area, Toretsk, barriers to service delivery and vulnerabilities informant interviews (CKIIs), Focus Group of the assessed strata with a 95% confidence experienced significant armed conflict resulting relating to household access. Discussions (FGDs) with enumerators, interval, and a 7% margin of error. Note that in the destruction of the city council building as and HH surveys. KIIs were conducted with findings from smaller subsets may have a The basic services assessed in this CVA well as serious damage to infrastructure and representatives of service providers in Toretsk lower level of confidence and a wider margin are: education, healthcare, social, and civil housing. At the time of this assessment Municipality to assess the impact of the of error. administrative services, and food markets, (Nov-Dec 2018), some settlements continued conflict on service provision and identify any non-food item (NFI) markets, construction Limitations to be exposed to regular shelling, creating markets, banks, ATMs, post offices, and current challenges faced in providing services. ongoing security concerns for the local Some KIs interviewed were not working pharmacies. Data is disaggregated by rural REACH conducted HH surveys to assess population. for their facility in 2013 and hence were and urban areas as well as whether a facility perceptions of changes in the availability and unaware of the issues faced at that time. Before the conflict, in order to access basic or household is within 5km of the contact line quality of services since 2013. Following field Consequentially, in those cases, comparisons services, people often travelled using (5km) or beyond 5km of the contact line (>5km). visits, enumerators participated in workshops of the humanitarian situation in 2013 and 2018 convenient rail connections to large hubs The study further compares perceptions of in order to share their direct observations were a challenge. On questions related to the such as Horlivka and Donetsk, now both in the change in service provision and access of the conditions of each facility. The data provision of services, some responses may be the NGCA. By 2018, Toretsk had become from 2013 to 2018. The findings will be used collection for CKIIs used a purposive sampling slightly under-reported as respondents may one of the biggest cities located in proximity to inform humanitarian and development aid method. Pensioners, strategic professionals have believed it would increase their likelihood to the contact line, consequently the pressure providers in their support of basic service and service providers were interviewed: of receiving assistance, especially at a facility on service providers in this area increased delivery. three in rural and five in urban settlements. CKIs reported on the community’s access to level regarding the availability of equipment. Primary data collection methods Table 1. HH survey sample services and the occurrence of shelling in their To mitigate this potential bias, REACH Household (HHs) Surveys 769 Stratum 1 Stratum 2 Sample size community. Using a network approach, REACH enumerators briefed respondents prior to data Urban* 5km 206 also mapped perceptions of change of HHs’ collection that participating would not directly lead to humanitarian assistance. In addition, Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) 81* Urban >5km 200 access to services, comparing perceptions of access in 2013 to access in 2018, identifying responses regarding security incidents and Key Informant Interviews Rural 5km 190 extra burdens on service providers. Annex A shortages may potentially be under reported Community (CKIIs) 62 Rural >5km 173 contains a more detailed methodology note on due to the normalisation of security issues as Workshops with enumerators 20 *Note: settlements in Ukraine are officially classified as “village,” “urban- the network approach employed. a result of the protracted nature of the conflict. type village,” or “city.” This assessment classifies villages as rural and *Some key informants were interviewed regarding multiple facilities urban-type villages/cities as urban. 1 Map 1. Assessed Settlements in Toretsk Municipality Berestok Bila Hora Kodema Slovianskyi raion Luhanska oblast Ivanopillia Kurdiumivka Mykolaivka Bakhmutskyi raion Popasnianskyi Druha Stepanivka Donetska oblast raion Dyliivka Bakhmutskyi raion Pleshchiivka Kostiantynivskyi raion Dobropilskyi Nelipivka Ozarianivka raion Dacha Pokrovskyi raion Kostiantynivskyi Dyliivka NGCA raion Yablunivka Yasynuvatskyi raion Dachne Yablunivka Kleban-Byk Yablunivka Hladosove Travneve Katerynivka Oleksandro-Kalynove Krymske Druzhba Zaitseve Holmivskyi Pivnichne Shcherbynivka Toretsk Maiorske Kostiantynivskyi Petrivka raion Shumy 4+9+7+5+2+3 Leonidivka Pivdenne Romanivka Zalizne Zoria Settlements Nelipivka Assessed Not assessed Yasynuvatskyi raion No data Hnativka Horlivka Toretsk Urban Shumy Rural Stara Sukha Balka Novhorodske Horlivska Mykolaivka AssessmeHorlntivka failure reason: Security issues 2+11+6+5+4+3 Valentynivka Yurivka Checkpoint Contact Line (OCHA, as of August 2018) Kalynove 5km area Panteleimonivka Shyroka Balka NGCA Toretsk city council 0 12345 Km Oleksandropil 2 W Population The residents of Toretsk Municipality Figure 1. Population geographic distribution Map 2. Population (estimated population - 68,636 people) face consistent conflict-related challenges as the Kurdiumivka proportion of people living within 5 km of the contact line (90%), greatly outweighs the Ozarianivka Bakhmutskyi population living beyond 5 km (10%) (Figure raion Kostiantynivskyi 1). Moreover, as illustrated in Map 2, almost raion Dyliivka all of the area's largest cities (more than 5000 9+1873A Dachne residents), are located within the 5km zone. 75+ Urban >5km Krymske Consequentially, residents of more remote and 4% 2%9% Druzhba smaller settlements are likely to be exposed to Rural >5km 1% Toretsk Shcherbynivka Pivnichne various protection risks when visiting important 61-75 Urban 5km 14% 10%87% administrative and service provision centers in Maiorske Rural 5km 3% Petrivka the cities. Shumy 46-60 15% 9% Zalizne Pivdenne Overall, Toretsk Municipality is highly Figure 2. Population pyramid (>5km) Leonidivka urbanised (96% of the population concentrated 4+9+7+5+2+3 1+5+6+5+4+3 Nelipivka in the cities, Figure 1) due to the historic 31-456% 75+8% 7% 2% economic orientation towards mining rather Yasynuvatskyi 18% 61-75 9% raion than agriculture, with the coal industry leading 16-30 7% 7% Novhorodske 14% 46-60 12% Sukha Balka Reported population in assessed its economy. settlements (persons) 75+8% 31-45 9% n l 4% 2% ba ra With regard to reported age groups, the highest Valentynivka Yurivka ur ru proportion of residents are aged between 61 0-154% 16-308% 8% 7% less than 1000 1000 - 5000 and 75 years (Figure 2 and 3), followed by pre- 61-755% 0-1514% 10% 6% more than 5000 pensioners (46-60 years), both of which can be Female Male 0 24 considered to be among the most vulnerable Km groups owing to low pensions, lack of job 46-60 15% 9% Figure 3. Population pyramid (5km) opportunities and age-related common health Table 2. Estimated population of the largest Inaccessible settlements due to restrictions on 2+11+6+5+4+3 1+7+5+4+3+4 issues. These findings indicate that there is a 31-45 8% 7% assessed settlements movement 4% 75+ 2% trend towards working-age populations leaving Toretsk 32,873 61-75 14% - Zalizne this once economically productive region to 22% 16-30 46-607% 7% 8% - Pivdenne seek better jobs. 11% Novhorodske 10,373 9% 31-45 7% - Shumy 0-15 16-308%
Recommended publications
  • Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Between 2014–2018
    VIOLENT CRIMES Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 Kharkiv Human Rights Publisher 2018 УДК 355.012АТО(477)’’2014/2018’’(047)=111 Н31 THE List OF abbreviations This report was prepared with financial support of AI — Amnesty International; MTOT — Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Terri- tories and Internally Displaced Persons; ATO — Anti-Terrorist Operation; NGO — Non-Governmental Organization CC — Criminal Code of Ukraine; NPU — National Police of Ukraine; CMA — Civil-Military Administration; OTDLR — Occupied Territories of Donetsk and Lu- СMPO — Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office; hansk Regions; СP — Checkpoint; OSCE — Organization for Security and Coopera- CPC — Criminal Procedural Code; tion in Europe; EXCP — Entry-Exit Checkpoint; PLWHA — People Living with HIV/AIDS; DSA — District State Administration; RSA — Regional State Administration; RS — Rome Statute; ECHR — European Convention on Human Rights; Yuriy Aseev, Volodymyr Hlushchenko, Boris Knyrov, Natalia Okhotnikova, Anna Ovdiienko, LNR — the self-proclaimed “Luhansk People’s ECtHR — European Court of Human Rights; Olena Richko, Gennady Shcherbak, Pavlo Shvab, Yanina Smelyanska, Igor Sosonsky, Republic”; Gennadiy Tokarev, Martha Vovk, Anastasia Yegorova, Yevgeniy Zakharov GC — Geneva Convention(s) of 12 August 1949; DNR — the self-proclaimed “Donetsk People’s Н31 Violent Crimes Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 / HRMM — UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission Republic”; compiler Yevgeniy Zakharov; CO “Kharkiv
    [Show full text]
  • The MH17 Trial Part 2: the Bezler Tapes, a Case of Red Herrings? - Bellingcat
    03.11.2020 The MH17 Trial Part 2: The Bezler Tapes, a Case of Red Herrings? - bellingcat The MH17 Trial Part 2: The Bezler Tapes, a Case of Red Herrings? October 17, 2020 MH17 Russia Translations: Русский When Dutch prosecutors of the court in The Hague read out their case against four suspects charged with complicity in the downing of MH17, they also explained why individuals previously linked to this crime were not (yet) indicted. One of them is former Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) separatist leader Igor Bezler, a Russian citizen with ties to Russia’s military intelligence agency (known as the GRU) who currently lives in Russian-annexed Crimea. The main pieces of evidence that previously linked Bezler to this crime concern two of his phone calls that were originally intercepted by the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU). One of the recordings was part of a conversation with alleged GRU officer Vasily Geranin in which Bezler announces the downing of an aircraft just twenty minutes after MH17. The SBU had released this recording on the day of the downing along with the accusation that the Bezler Group was directly involved in the downing of MH17. The other intercepted conversation was released one week later and became known as the “birdie conversation”. In this call, which according to the SBU was recorded just two minutes before the downing of MH17, Bezler is informed by someone with the call sign “Naemnik” (“Mercenary”) that a “birdie” – i.e. an aircraft – flew towards him. Both calls have been the subject of much speculation in the media, and were also the subject of analysis in previous Bellingcat reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of the Cultural Landscape of Donbas During the Armed Conflict 2015–2017
    Studia z Geografii Politycznej i Historycznej tom 6 (2017), s. 305–326 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2300-0562.06.13 Roman Slyvka, Liubov Slyvka, Yaroslava Atamaniuk Transformations of the cultural landscape of Donbas during the armed conflict 2015–2017 The main objective of the article – to show the different trajectories of the cultural land- scape in controlled and uncontrolled parts of the war-torn Donbas. The cultural landscape of Ukraine significantly changed during the twentieth century. The main factors of these transformations were ideological, military and geopolitical. The sub-ordinate position of Ukraine within the USSR allowed communist leaders to enforce sovietisation of the cultural landscape. This policy was especially noticeable in the great industrial region of Donbas. Achievements of independence by Ukraine and democratization of country' public life have led to transformation/conservation of the cultural landscape, which corresponded with political culture of individual regions. The war in the Donbas has become a catalyst for the processes of creating different types of cultural landscape on the different sides of the contact line. The policy of creating a cultural landscape has become an instrument of political socialization and mobilization of the population. This process is not complete, and can contribute to the crystallization of new subregional identities on different parts of contemporary Donbas. Keywords: Donbas, cultural landscape, post-soviet city, military conflict, decomunisa- tion, renaming, monument, policy of memory. 1. Introduction The conflict in Donbas deepened those political divisions that began to be observed in Ukrainian society since the 1990s. There are a number of visible elements of Donbas' cultural landscape, which indicates the drastic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kramatorsk, Ukraine 28 August 2019
    General Coordination Meeting – Kramatorsk, Ukraine 28 August 2019 Discussion Action points/Decisions OVERVIEW OF HUMANITARIAN SITUATION United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs provided the following update: • OCHA CMCoord informed about latest updates regarding security situation in the area. • RC/HC Ms. Osnat Lubrani held a visit to Donetsk and Luhansk oblast. She met with UN agencies and NGOs to discuss recent developments in humanitarian and HDN. Ms Lubrani also visited the village of Opytne in order to assess the humanitarian situation there and see humanitarian activities implemented by partners. • In commemoration of the World Humanitarian Day (WHD), UNOCHA, together with international and national organizations based in Kramatorsk and in close collaboration with the local authorities of Donetska oblast and the city of Kramatorsk, organized an open space event. The main objective of the event was to raise awareness about the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine and the response efforts of the international organizations through displaying different activities and engaging with the public in an interactive way. Event started in time and gathered 20 partners. Some 1000-2000 guests attended the place. RC/HC and Governor delivered their speeches and had a tour around the side with all the partners presenting themselves to RC/HC and Governor. Governor was very active in getting acquainted with partners and asked many questions. Partner were able to address some concerns during the discussion. Later, after short informal discussion, RC/HC introduced to the Governor her special advisor on HDN. After the departure of the Governor, RC/HC had few short informal discussions with partners and OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.FR/876/20 29 December 2020 OSCE+ ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT CHECKPOINTS ALONG THE CONTACT LINE: CHALLENGES CIVILIANS FACE WHEN CROSSING 1 November 2019 - 15 November 2020 December 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Legislative and regulatory developments 9 Measures taken at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECP) and at the corresponding checkpoints of the 9 armed formations amid the COVID-19 outbreak (16 March to 10 June 2020) Regulatory developments following the partial reopening of the EECPs and of the corresponding check- 10 points (10 June to 15 November 2020) Other developments 12 Chapter 2: Impact on civilians of the freedom of movement restrictions and of the crossing requirements 14 after the partial reopening of the EECPs and the corresponding checkpoints Impact of freedom of movement restrictions on access to rights and services 14 Partial reopening of the EECPs and corresponding checkpoints, and burden of crossing requirements 18 on civilians Chapter 3: Opening of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge and construction works near Zolote and Shchas- 22 tia Opening of the renovated section of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge 22 Construction and works near Shchastia and Zolote 22 Conclusion 26 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crucial aspects of the lives of civilians in the conflict-affected areas of eastern Ukraine depend on their ability to cross the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Eastern Europe
    Land Reform in Eastern Europe Western CIS, Transcaucuses, Balkans, and EU Accession Countries Renee Giovarelli David Bledsoe Seattle, Washington October 2001 This paper was prepared under contract with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The positions and opinions presented are those of the author alone, and are not intended to represent the views of FAO. The Rural Development Institute (RDI), located in Seattle, Washington, USA, is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation. RDI is a unique organization of lawyers devoted to problems of land reform and related issues in less developed countries and transitional economies. RDI’s goal is to assist in alleviating world poverty and instability through land reform and rural development. RDI staff have conducted field research and advised on land reform issues in 35 countries in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. For more information about RDI, visit the RDI web site at <www.rdiland.org>. Renee Giovarelli is a staff attorney at RDI and the Director of RDI’s Kyrgyzstan and Women & Land Programs. David Bledsoe is a staff attorney and Deputy Director of Administration at RDI. This report was prepared for submission to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The authors express their appreciation for the valuable input provided by Roy Prosterman, Leonard Rolfes, and Robert Mitchell. The authors would also like to acknowledge the important contributions of the following RDI Research Assistants to the preparation of this report: Laura Gerber, Oesa Glick, Devon Shannon, Kallie Szczepanski, and Alethea Williams. i Executive Summary The former socialist countries of Eastern Europe (that is, Europe east of Germany and west of the Urals, but including all of Russia) began a transition to a market economy in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine
    ` A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine August, 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This assessment was commissioned by UNICEF, with data collected remotely by REACH in July 2015 from key informants at water, health, and education facilities as well as from affected communities. Thanks go to all those individuals and organisations who contributed towards this assessment, including the Global WASH Cluster who contributed to the final analysis and drafting. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT, its sister organisation ACTED, and the United Nations Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions. For more information, write to [email protected], visit www.reach-intiative.org and follow us @REACH_info. Cover photo: Delivery of drinking water to Debaltseve, Donetsk Oblast, March 2015, ©UNICEF i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conflict has been ongoing in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts since May 2014, with spikes of violence in June 2014 and again in January-February and in July 2015. Attempts to negotiate a political solution to the conflict led to the ‘Minsk’ ceasefire signed between the Governments of Ukraine, Russian Federation and the non-state actors in September 2014. However, the truce collapsed within days, similar to a new ceasefire agreement signed in February 2015. Relative calm around the Contact Line (CL) has ensued since September 2015, however, the situation remains fragile given lack of trust between the parties to the conflict. From the end of 2014, Ukrainian legislation has restricted freedom of moment of both people and goods, in addition to the cessation of salary and pension payments in the non-governmental controlled areas (NGCAs), increasing hardship for local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT Hardship for Conflict-Affected Civilians in Eastern
    THEMATIC REPORT Hardship for conflict-affected civilians in eastern Ukraine February 2017 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2017 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non- commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: Table of Contents A) Summary ..................................................................................................................................... - 1 - B) Introduction and methodology .................................................................................................... - 2 - C) General observations .................................................................................................................. - 3 - 1. Conduct of hostilities in populated areas......................................................................... - 3 - i) Presence and use of weapons in populated areas ............................................................... - 4 - ii) Presence of armed positions in populated areas ................................................................. - 5 - iii) Areas not fully controlled by any of the sides.................................................................... - 6 - 2. Imposed restrictions affecting civilians ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainians in Russia: a Bibliographic and Statistical Guide
    Research Report No. 55 Ukrainians in Russia: A Bibliographic and Statistical Guide Compiled by Serge Cipko Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press University of Alberta Edmonton 1994 Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press Occasional Research Reports The Institute publishes research reports periodically. Copies may be ordered from the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 352 Athabasca Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E8. The name of the publication series and the substantive material in each issue (unless otherwise noted) are copyrighted by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press. PRINTED IN CANADA Occasional Research Reports Ukrainians in Russia: A Bibliographic and Statistical Guide Compiled by Serge Cipko Research Report No. 55 Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press University of Alberta Edmonton 1994 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/ukrainiansinruss55cipk Table of Contents Introduction 1 A Select Bibliography 3 Newspaper Articles 9 Ukrainian Periodicals and Journals Published in Russia 15 Periodicals Published Abroad by Ukrainians from Russia 18 Biographies of Ukrainians in Russia 21 Biographies of Ukrainians from Russia Resettled Abroad 31 Statistical Compendium of Ukrainians in Russia 33 Addresses of Ukrainian Organizations in Russia 39 Periodicals and Journals Consulted 42 INTRODUCTION Ukrainians who live in countries bordering on Ukraine constitute perhaps the second largest ethnic minority in Europe after the Russians. Despite their significant numbers, however, these Ukrainians remain largely unknown to the international community, receiving none of the attention that has been accorded, for example, to Russian minorities in the successor states to the former Soviet Union. According to the last Soviet census of 1989, approximately 4.3 million Ukrainians live in the Russian Federation; unofficial estimates of the size of this group run considerably higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas Tailings Storage Facilities
    DONBAS TAILINGS STORAGE FACILITIES Ministry of Energy and Environmental Protection of Ukraine AUTHORS: Iryna Nikolaieva – PhD, Head of a Research Group for Current State of Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs), Environmental Safety Expert, Leading Environmental Auditor Hanna Lenko – Environmental Engineering Expert, Environmental Auditor Oleksandr Lobodzinskyi – Junior Researcher, Hydrologist, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine We would like to thank Dr. Serhii Chumachenko for the significant contribution at the first stage of the project The work was completed under the OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine project “Assistance in the Donbas Environmental Monitoring System Expansion”, hereinafter (“the Project”) in partnership with the Ministry of Energy and Environmental Protection of Ukraine and with assistance of Donetsk Regional State Administration, Siverskyi Donetsk Basin Water Administration, OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine, and the management of the “Metinvest” group of companies and Public Company “Dzerzhynska Processing Plant”. The Project expresses gratitude for the high level of communication, professional support and fruitful cooperation to the representatives of TSF operators: Metinvest Holding LLC: Vladyslav Varnavskyi, Head of the Environmental Protection Department PJSC “Avdiivka Coke Plant”: Denys Kaduk, Director on Labor Protection, Industrial Safety and Environment; Vasylii Kyrbaba, Head of the environmental Protection Department; Oksana Drobot, Lead Environmental Engineer; Yuliia Minenko, Press office Representative SMA “Inkor and Co” LLC: Volodymyr Hridiaiev, Head of the Department on Labor Protection, Industrial Safety and Environment; Olha Brizan, Chief Environmental Specialist – Head of the Environmental Protection Laboratory; Yuliia Besida, Engineer of the Environmental Protection Laboratory Public Company “Dzerzhynska Processing Plant”: Olena Semeniak, Deputy Director on Labor Protection.
    [Show full text]