DOCSLIB.ORG

REACH Protection Assessment in Isolated Settlements In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REACH Protection Assessment in Isolated Settlements In UKRAINE Protection Assessment of Isolated Settlements in Government-Controlled Areas Along the Contact Line February, 2019 In Partnership with: With additional contributions from: REACH and the Protection Cluster would like to give special thanks to all of the organisations that contributed to this research. An extended list of partners that supported as key informants can be found in Annex 2 (p. 42). Cover photo © REACH/2019 About REACH REACH is a joint initiative of two international non-governmental organizations - ACTED and IMPACT Initiatives - and the UN Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH’s mission is to strengthen evidence- based decision making by aid actors through efficient data collection, management and analysis before, during and after an emergency. By doing so, REACH contributes to ensuring that communities affected by emergencies receive the support they need. All REACH activities are conducted in support to and within the framework of inter- agency aid coordination mechanisms. For more information please visit our website: www.reach-initiative.org. You can contact us directly at: [email protected] and follow us on Twitter @REACH_info. Protection Assessment of Isolated Settlements – February 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Context The protracted nature of the conflict in Ukraine has created a widespread humanitarian crisis, with 3.5 million people in need of humanitarian aid after more than five years of armed hostilities.1 Additionally, there has been large-scale displacement from government and non-government controlled areas (GCA and NGCA respectively) of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, with the Ministry of Social Policy reporting 1.4 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) registered as of February 2019.2 The contact line that divides these two areas continues to separate urban centres in the NGCA from their peripheral towns and villages in the GCA, transforming areas that were once the outskirts of large cities into isolated, hard-to-reach areas. Such isolated settlements are fully or partially cut off from surrounding areas due to the contact line, checkpoints, landmine/unexploded ordnance (UXO) contamination and poor road conditions. In 2018, 66% of armed clashes within the GCA occurred in the assessed isolated settlements.3 The concentrated nature of the conflict means that residents of these settlements are at particularly high physical risk. As a result, many of these settlements have experienced significant depopulation due to displacement of residents; REACH estimates that the overall population has declined by 38% from 97,600 prior to the conflict to approximately 69,000 at the time of assessment, including the departure of a significant proportion of younger people. Although the NGCA contains similarly isolated settlements, they were outside the scope of this assessment. Accessing these hard-to-reach settlements also presents higher security risk and logistical challenges for humanitarian actors. Insecurity prevented access to several settlements during the survey, and these conditions also constrict the flow of assistance to these locations. Assessment This assessment was commissioned by European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO) to investigate the specific protection concerns of residents of such isolated settlements, and to understand the drivers and consequences of these issues. To achieve this, REACH partnered with the Ukraine Protection Cluster and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in research design, analysis and reporting to maximise the operational utility of the findings for humanitarian organisations engaged in protection programming. The assessment utilised a mixed-methodology approach, including a quantitative survey of 1,474 households (HH) in 53 isolated settlements along the contact line including a total of 3,109 household members. The assessed area was stratified by oblast and by urban/rural characteristics of the settlements, with results generalisable in isolated settlements in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts (urban and rural settlements) with a 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error. Primary data collection also included 30 focus group discussions (FGDs) with vulnerable populations, 107 key informant interviews (KIIs) and 46 direct observation workshops conducted by REACH enumerators and partner members of the Protection Cluster including Istok, Proliska, Save the Children, HelpAge International and the International Medical Corps. The study explored the following research questions: 1. What are the demographic, geographic and socio-economic profiles of the population living in isolated settlements? 2. What are the displacement patterns of the populations living in isolated settlements? 3. What are the specific protection risks faced by conflict-affected populations living in isolated settlements? 4. How do protection concerns differ between vulnerable categories and settlement types? 5. What are the specific drivers of the protection concerns faced by different population groups/categories living in isolated settlements? 1 United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 2019. Humanitarian Needs Overview Ukraine. Available online. 2 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), 2019. Registration of Internal Displacement Dashboard. Available online. 3 Data extracted from INSO data. 1 Protection Assessment of Isolated Settlements – February 2019 6. What are the coping strategies being used by conflict-affected populations living in isolated settlements? 7. What are the specific protection needs of the conflict-affected population living in isolated settlements? 8. What are the main issues faced by people living in isolated settlements in relation to access to basic services? 9. Which basic services that are used as means of support are disrupted by the conflict? Key Findings Vulnerable demographic of residents The study found isolated settlements to have a high concentration of vulnerable persons: 41% of household members were over the age of 60, and 13% had a disability. Such proportions may relate to the fact that people of working age have been able to leave, while older, more vulnerable people are less likely to be able to afford relocation and cost of living in safer areas. Indeed, residents of the assessed settlements were more than twice as likely to be over the age of 60 than were IDPs as assessed by International Organization for Migration (IOM) across Ukraine,4 and just less than twice as likely to be over the age of 60 than the overall population of Ukraine.5 Correspondingly, households in isolated settlements were significantly smaller than the national average (average of 2.1 members in isolated settlements and average of 2.66 nationally). Isolated settlements also had a higher proportion of women, 61% of household members compared to 56% in the area within 20km of the contact line and a correspondingly lower proportion of children, with 14% of household members under the age of 18 in isolated settlements and 18% in the 20km area. Many household members also reported experiencing overlapping vulnerabilities, particularly relating to older people with chronic illness, but also older people with disabilities and to a certain extent overlapping vulnerability relating to unemployment and chronic illness (Figure 1). Such overlapping vulnerabilities compound risk factors as often persons with multiple vulnerabilities require additional social support. However, in isolated settlements, the provision of services is curtailed as a result of insecurity and inaccessibility; thus, those who need support the most are less likely to receive it. Figure 1. Overlapping vulnerabilities of household members in the assessed isolated settlements Sustained exposure to armed conflict The isolated settlements have experienced regular violent clashes for more than five years. According to data from International NGO Safety Organisation (INSO),7 in 2018 the assessed isolated settlements were twice as likely 4 IOM, 2019. National Monitoring System on the Situation of Internally Displaced Persons. Available online. 5 Data extracted from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine online portal. Available online. 6 Ibid. 7 Data extracted from INSO security incident datasets. More information on INSO activities in Ukraine is available online. 2 Protection Assessment of Isolated Settlements – February 2019 to have security incidents as compared to other settlements in the 5 km area. As a consequence, in addition to the risk of shooting and shelling, the area experiences some of the highest rates in the world of contamination by landmines and UXO,8 creating significant physical security risks for residents. Despite protracted conflict, however, residents of isolated settlements were generally not aware of the location of their nearest bomb shelter (71%). Residents additionally reported experiencing high levels of fear, with 74% of households reporting feeling a periodic or constant threat to their life during daytime hours, and a greater proportion (80%) during the night. KIs from health care facilities reported that long-term exposure to these risks had increased psychological stress, and that such stress was the driving factor in the use of negative coping strategies. Impact of isolation The contact line and insecurity have disrupted transportation links and the smaller secondary roads that exist are in poor condition. Public transportation was reportedly available rarely in some settlements,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Overview: Winter Assessment of Government-Controlled Areas Within 5Km of the Line of Contact Ukraine, February 2018
    Situation Overview: Winter Assessment of Government-Controlled Areas within 5km of the Line of Contact Ukraine, February 2018 Introduction & Key Findings Population & Displacement Map 1: Assessed Settlements Shchastia The area along the LoC has a significant Trokhizbenka Artema Eastern Ukraine experiences harsh winters population of vulnerable groups including Krymske Petropavlivka Nyzhnoteple Staryi Aidar lasting from November to March, with Oriikhove Nyzhnie Kriakivka Stanytsia pensioners, internally displaced persons (IDPs) ² Peredilske Luhanska temperatures reaching below -20 degrees Donetsk GCA Zolote Hirske Makarove and returnees. This is as a result of the out- Komyshuvakha Valluiiske Celsius. Such extreme conditions impact migration of less vulnerable people with the Kateryniivka the humanitarian needs of populations living Popasna means and ability to live and work elsewhere. Vilkhove Myronivskyi Novozvanivka in conflict-affected areas due to increased Half of the displaced persons in the area along Svitlodarsk difficulty accessing services, damage to Semyhiria Troiitske the line of contact arrived in 2014, and have no Novoluhanske Kodema critical infrastructure affecting water and Ozarianivka plans to return to their area of origin (AoO) in Druzhba heating systems, and decreased availability Toretsk the foreseeable future due to security concerns, Pivnichne of nutritious foods. These issues are more political differences, or lack of accommodation. Zalizne NovhorodskeNovhoro ske pronounced along the line of contact (LoC) The
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: 39111 Project Name Alchevsk Steel Mill Revamping and Modernization Region EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Public Disclosure Authorized Sector Other industry (100%) Project ID P101615 Borrower(s) OJSC ‘Alchevsk Iron and Steel Works’ Implementing Agency OJSC ‘Alchevsk Iron and Steel Works’ Shmidt str.4 Alchevsk Lugansk Region P.O.94202 Tel: +38-06442-9-33-01, +38-06442-9-32-10 Email: [email protected] Environment Category [ ] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) Date PID Prepared January 30, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Estimated Date of Review April 10, 2007 of CFEM Estimated Date of ERPA June 29, 2007 Signing 1. Key development issues and rationale for Bank involvement After a decade of economic decline following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine entered a period of strong growth and macroeconomic stability showing the highest GDP growth rates in Europe – average of 8.4% per annum between 2000 and 2004. With inflation under control, Ukraine achieved significant poverty reduction reporting some of the lowest poverty levels in the region. Democratic transformation of the country initiated in 2004 opened new opportunities for Public Disclosure Authorized economic growth and foreign investment as new government declared Euro-Atlantic integration the main policy priority. However, economic slowdown started beginning 2005, with GDP growth declining to 2.6% in 2005. Inflation increased to over 10% per annum due to an expansive monetary policy and increased social payments. Ukraine is an export-driven economy with an export reaching nearly 52% of GDP. The main exporters are traditional energy and resource intensive heavy industries – steel, chemical and machine building.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Peacekeepers in the Donbas JFQ 91, 4Th Quarter 2017 12 India to Lead the Mission
    Eastern Ukrainian woman, one of over 1 million internally displaced persons due to conflict, has just returned from her destroyed home holding all her possessions, on main street in Nikishino Village, March 1, 2015 (© UNHCR/Andrew McConnell) cal ploy; they have suggested calling Putin’s bluff. However, they also realize Peacekeepers the idea of a properly structured force with a clear mandate operating in support of an accepted peace agreement in the Donbas could offer a viable path to peace that is worth exploring.2 By Michael P. Wagner Putin envisions a limited deploy- ment of peacekeepers on the existing line of contact in Donbas to safeguard OSCE-SMM personnel.3 Such a plan ince the conflict in Ukraine September 5, 2017, when he proposed could be effective in ending the conflict began in 2014, over 10,000 introducing peacekeepers into Eastern and relieving immediate suffering, but it people have died in the fighting Ukraine to protect the Organiza- S could also lead to an open-ended United between Russian-backed separatists tion for Security and Co-operation in Nations (UN) commitment and make and Ukrainian forces in the Donbas Europe–Special Monitoring Mission long-term resolution more challenging. region of Eastern Ukraine. The Ukrai- to Ukraine (OSCE-SMM). Despite Most importantly, freezing the conflict nian government has repeatedly called halting progress since that time, restart- in its current state would solidify Russian for a peacekeeping mission to halt ing a peacekeeping mission remains an control of the separatist regions, enabling the bloodshed, so Russian President important opportunity.1 Many experts it to maintain pressure on Ukraine by Vladimir Putin surprised the world on remain wary and dismiss it as a politi- adjusting the intensity level as it de- sires.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Adcmemorial.Org with the Support of the Centre for Social and Gender
    adcmemorial.org With the support of the Centre for Social and Gender Research Alternative Report for the 66th Session of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women February 2017 Ukrainian Women: Caught Between New Challenges and Long-Standing Discrimination Overview The situation of women in Ukraine is connected with the overall situation in the country – the significant political changes of recent years, the economic crisis, and aggression from neighboring Russia (manifested in the annexation of Crimea and military actions in Eastern Ukraine) have impacted the quality of life for millions of women. War, poverty, unemployment, and instability have hit women hard and heightened the vulnerability of this group that is already discriminated against. The situation of vulnerable groups remains complicated, in spite of the steps Ukraine has taken to implement European requirements to improve the norms of anti-discrimination laws and to attain the required human rights standards. The law “On Principles of Prevention and Combatting Discrimination in Ukraine” (No. 5207-VI of 6 September 2012) contains a ban on discrimination on the basis of gender; however, women’s rights are restricted both in practice and in legal labor norms left over from Soviet times. The Ministry of Health orders “On the Approval of the List of Arduous, Dangerous, and Harmful Occupations Banned for Women” (of 29 December 1993)1 and “On the Approval of Limits for the Lifting and Moving of Heavy Objects by Women”2 (No. 194 of 22 December 1993; this ban on lifting heavy objects may serve as official grounds for denying a woman a position of interest to her; instead of a ban, there should be measures in place to protect women’s health and – if necessary – to warn about health risks).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972. Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the co- Валерьевич signatories of the ’treaty on Crimea´s accession to the Russian AKCëHOB), Federation’ of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014 he was appointed acting Serhiy Valeriyovych ‘Head’ of the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’ by President Putin. On 9 AKSYONOV (Сергiй October 2014, he was formally ‘elected’ 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic Валерiйович Аксьонов) of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of ‘Head’ and ‘Prime Minister’ be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. 1/83 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV in the decisions taken by the ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. (Рустам Ильмирович Buryat ASSR He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Темиргалиев) (Russian SFSR) Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Decision (Cfsp) 2015
    6.3.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 62/25 COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/364 of 5 March 2015 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof, Whereas: (1) On 5 March 2014, the Council adopted Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1). (2) On 29 January 2015, Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/143 (2) clarified the designation criteria for the freezing of funds targeting persons responsible for the misappropriation of Ukrainian State funds. (3) The restrictive measures set out in Decision 2014/119/CFSP apply until 6 March 2015. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the application of those restrictive measures should be extended until 6 March 2016 in respect of 14 persons, and until 6 June 2015 in respect of four persons. The entries for 18 persons should be amended. (4) Decision 2014/119/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 Decision 2014/119/CFSP is amended as follows: (1) Article 5 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 5 This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Decision shall apply until 6 March 2016. The measures in Article 1 shall apply with regard to entries No 4, 8, 10 and 13 in the Annex until 6 June 2015. This Decision shall be kept under constant review.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Ukraine
    UKRAINE - East Ukraine For Humanitarian Purposes Only Pre-Conflict and Current Network for Selling Produce Production date : 10 October 2017 Pre-Conflict LUHANSK GCA Current LUHANSK GCA ² SIEVIERODONETSK ! SIEVIERODONETSK ! ! NOVOAIDAR ! NOVOAIDAR LYSYCHANSK ! LYSYCHANSK! SLOVIANSK EAST LUHANSK SLOVIANSK ! EAST LUHANSK POPASNA ! POPASNA ! ! ! KRAMATORSK ! KRAMATORSK ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! STANYTSIA! STANYTSIA! BAKHMUT ! ! LUHANSKA DRUZHKIVKA ! LUHANSKA POPASNA ! BAKHMUT POPASNA PERVOMAISK DRUZHKIVKA ! PERVOMAISK ! ! ! LUHANSK ! LUHANSK ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! ! ! ALCHEVSK TORETSK ALCHEVSK TORETSK !! ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! ! ! ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK AVDIIVKA AVDIIVKA ! ! KHRUSTALNYI KHRUSTALNYI ! AVDIIVKA ! SELYDOVE ! SELYDOVE ANTRATSYT AVDIIVKA ANTRATSYT YASYNUVATA YASYNUVATA SHAKHTARSK SHAKHTARSK ! MAKIIVKA MAKIIVKA KRASNOHORIVKA ! SNIZHNE KURAKHOVE ! !DONETSK ! DONETSK SNIZHNE WEST WEST DONETSK DONETSK ! ! DONETSK NGCA ! DONETSK NGCA ! ! ! ! VOLNOVAKHA ! VOLNOVAKHA ! ! ! ! RUSSIAN RUSSIAN FEDERATION ! FEDERATION SOUTH ! SOUTH DONETSK DONETSK ! !! ! MARIUPOL ! MARIUPOL ! SUMSKA Kms SEA OF AZOV SEA OF AZOV 0 10 20 30 POLTAVSKA KHARKIVSKA Settlements Selling Produce (symbol size Data Sources: LUHANSKA based on number of settlements with citizens Water bodies: © Open Street Map contributors who sold within) Assessed Settlements Administrative boundaries, settlements: OCHA, 2017 ! 1 DNIPROPETROVSKA Selling own agricultural produce connection Service network data: REACH, June 2017 ! ≤ 5 DONETSKA Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 37 N ! ≤ 10 BSU Boundary Contact: [email protected] ZAPORIZKA ! ≤ 15 5km Buffer from INSO Grey Zone RUSSIAN Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free FEDERATION ≤ 30 and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associated, or donors mentioned on this SEA OF AZOV ! INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) map..
    [Show full text]